ML102710031
| ML102710031 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/2010 |
| From: | Caruso J Operations Branch I |
| To: | FitzPatrick |
| Hansell S | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML092470037 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01786 | |
| Download: ML102710031 (18) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:ES*201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: -h n f1lretc-K' Date of Exa~~1i6 S/'5-. p Developed by: Written - Facility Xi NRC 0 /I Operating - Facility
.~ NRC 0 .W~ 5/illlt Target Chief Date" Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 1t 1
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) rA II:,
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
~
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) ~1Ji
[-90] [S. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] Of\ V {-7S} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3,
~
ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1f2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} '~r {-4S} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenariOS, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms
~
ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) v
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) ~
-14
-14
- 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1: C.2.i; ES-202)
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review i ¥ (C.2.h; C.3.f} ~t
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) \.
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
~
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent f'
(C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) Yl
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) Q.
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) ~.
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination: Initials Ite Task Description m a b c
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance W with ES-401. {j2 ~ )A r R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly I
T T prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. gJ &I~
~~
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, E
evolutions, or generic topics. .e~ N
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. g1 ~ 1M
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover v the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and S component failures. technical specifications. and major transients.
11'!. ~~ I , , M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test U the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the L expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity. and ensure that each applicant can be A T 0 R tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. dZ
<Sf\t
- c. To the extent possible. assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) 1~
with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES 301-4 and described in Appendix D. tt
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: &1 W (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and I in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified T on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the ~ '({\
limits speCified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on 13 1 Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form if'
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected ~ ~A-
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insi hts are covered in the a ro riate exam sections.
G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is E a ro riate. N
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific E
riorities are at least 2.5. R A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
Q;.1U~~~ d Name/Signature I ()qDate
/0,
- a. Author
~~-
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) (0
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor 5g~4 Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence re uired.
Q) WdtcrJ O"H,,,l ()i-Il~ I&'t (j) ~il4v\/.\J.r II/Jo/ott IJ.t aJ ~ C(' Il.iC:J I () I/IS/II) it o AdMl1V ()~+/I/V( .fl,llv 1#
If¥1es f\. 'Fi tc~t(ic~ ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination sl'/7. 01O 5'/~s,,1to .;(Jt I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ;i:~iz~~Q as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of ~MI( . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE
- 1. J~&<fA.V P. E.'III\...;c,k ___Of>~J!'1-\YrV~_______~~~
- 2. t!l.jJc1'!:!l..E..L- Veedl'L_ (jf~Jd.::'TII.;.J.:!!.!!d)lIU. ~~¥~~d
- 3. ~.lJJ!:l:__ SlID' "'fiWNIJJ4 (.QuS'uL"G ...
F~yctf..S (3) S'jud ~ se~~ o.~(~t ~ T~\-e~. ES-201, Page 26 of 27 ~~ Wv-:..},k11 ~.v.t..." "'c..*"~d"le.l...ro 5:/'J~-//d ORl6 I Nt\L ~. \
~ J~t.\e:s A. htz:po..trtc.k. ES~201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination s;/;sJ;" * ~
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of $'111'~10 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not een authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered the week(s) of st&. ';we . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE tJercs"-.. SI\JO
~~~----------------
~~~~-,.-_L ~"6 7 . ...::rJtt6DAJ S.:.....;)4./V j!h.",< ~"f~'
~ a~
== ,=)~r
_~
~~1 ~s
<f:::./2.-/~_ ~_
- 8. SHAWN tJICHO(...S cl2S /~ljJJKO ,/'\ "I~d ..~ ~
- 9. R{(~ ~....\.... ,~ .A1>,..t\ -'in p.,
1o.l1lvh4d ~(1c.Z rtnQVI S ,'" 7("cIt~(qq", 11.~/W ,PIAc...sy( ..9.ltfuJ,.A-7Z>R W::+/J
- 12. 7<. t/v;l24X S:;Z~ J<.;'-' &/.y<--- .,t./l.'('/lu~}It:::: - z - - ~J.IIt!--
-13. b,3~~~11 (,) La! T~o;.,.;.... $... -\;:~C\~f ,""=,,, 117~ .. h h . ........t~_A
- 14. roB £>~M40 .$NZI r AA41~4 rtL..
- 15. :J~ ~~ llAitJ[j'l.
NOTES: V ¥ I * , t,> ?.e.'I. NCtc..cot'\el.U"(~, b;r. !avsse.(l's 011\ ~lt-'S~w...;~ Aj(~~Tt,y" ~f~ ~ /!)f\l'f. (1JJ.u\L'.~ 513/2.010). i~. c:..*"o,,,U~ . cP; f'{/,(t. ~ fJ1.a..J!"..,... ~ .. $'-/0 /(3/>>,;: s,--q-1o
~) S,Ae6 oft ~ St,.(.A.W~ ~<<",UJ- peA. ES-201, Page 26 of 27 / \"
Te[eco,"" *
.~ W.r,).-w 't.x,-?,.., .reJ,~d., I(J -/-. s*),;/
ORt61NI\L P9' 2..
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination s13/ 10 51... //<'
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~~"li:Q?! as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of su A.'oQ\lt . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY ,SI~AT~ D,A~E ~1~N')j~ DATE, NOTE
~:ih+/-~~~r~~~=~~~=--~=$~: ~~~~~
~:r\l~~~~~~~U;:JS--
____________CU.______ _-.S -~=~~l~N------- ___________________Q ________- .' , , _ - -:------------!fk4.Z'~~- ___________ .01JL ---- -- -- --~ _ -~b~~~---s-- __ _ ___~~'t
- 6. _~...f1l__ ~i~A...________~~~l~@:_Pl~_~.n.JL~"(e~_____ __ ______________ $J.~jJlII-- ~ ______
- 7. JM.~_S)f~~~'Y_______~~~R.__t!.~~_lli.S.'I~~!c1~_____
- 8. _~!..1._ilI..uejLb)..---- _SY¥.. +.](.-i~~..l..'"n..L--- __
----- ------- r't,..lHL~.~
~~.
_ ..l.1:' £I-.A; 1.
~9I-st-ll
____ _ _ _ ~ f 10
- 9. _________'-__________ ____________________________ _________ _ _____________ .________________________________________
-----------~~-------- ---~--------------------~--------------------------------------------------~------
~.-.------ .. --.... --.---.--.. --- --------------------------- ------ -------------------
1 _____________________________ NOTES: (2) M- C¥\ ~t~ o~ ~ ~ \,4J,,;~ ~XA"". ('3) 5i"MA bff J. t.YDMII. Sf.(.A.AM"t ,,(UWltM.t ptA Te[~CD"'. '" "'-t \U.. ;~ tYJi.W\ ft.5c.,\-td,I.l\-ed l> sl~sr'D ES-201, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Operating Test Quali!y Checklist Form ES-301*3 Facilitv: '~tAM.H. A. ~dl.i)(J.t{ll~ Date of Examination: 5/3 i10 0 II Initials
- 1. General Criteria a b* C#
- a. The operating test confonns with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). ~1 ~/t.. 'f.L
~
- b. There is no day-ta-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durina this examination. . ~ IIy ~/~
- c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit testIs). (see Section D.1.a.) &1 ~j" if\
v
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. I\~ IIJ/~ ~
~
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. ~'y J}//\
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria - - -
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: initial conditions initiating cues
., references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
, operationally important specific perfonnance critelia that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
~t pi/\. }\
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
~
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified Blr j.} 1,\
on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria - - -
~
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with
~'i. jj/~
Fonn ES-301-4 and a COpy is attached. V Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author UN nard, /, litil f /&MI/L~td... i:C/dI wt!L/L
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
;J/If /1 ~
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ~16v (~-f. ~ t> ('J/!--{f'?1. ~. 0
- d. NRC Supervisor ~-OtV1-t *.<-\) (1/(//3c. ~~:/ rLZ:flto NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301. Page 24 of 27
ES*301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES*301*4 mes AFitzpatrick Date of Exam: 5/3110 Scenario Numbers 1 12 14 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b" c# The Initial conditions are realistic. In that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
- 3. Each event description consists of
- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
- the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator acltons (by s~lift position)
- the event termination pOint (if applicable)
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident suctl as a seismiC evem.
- 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynarrics
- 6. Sequencing and tlm;ng of events is reasonable. and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate With the scenario objectives.
- 7. If time compression techniques are used. the scenario summary clearly SO indicates.
Operators have suffiCient tllne to carry oul expected activities Without undue time constraints. Cues are given.
- 8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
- 9. The scenarios have been validated Pursuant to 10 CFR 55,46(d). any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or si!jnificantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301
- 11. All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly Involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301*5 (submit the form With the simulator scenarios).
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing deCISions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes Total malfunctions (.5--8) 7/ 6 18
- 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 21 1 11 31 4 14 21 1 12 substantive actions 2/ 13
- 6. EOP cont.ngencles requiring suostantlve actions 11 3 10
- 7. Cntlcal tasks (2-3) 21 3 12
Scenano #1 Scenano#2 scenano#4
- 1. Total malfunctions (5-8)
- 1. )Recirc flow 1.~ Inadventent 1.) Uncoupled unit failure. H CI initiation control rod 2' 33E-6A FWH 2.) 'B' CRDfiow 2.) 06L1'-52B FWLC failure b tu e leak. control valve failure 3.) Inverter 3.~ Trip of 'B' failure 71-INV-3A 3.) 02-3LT-101A R PT failure 4.) Loss of 4.) LOCA condenser 4.) UPS Bus vacuum failure
- 5. Loss of offsite 5.) ATWAS 5.) Fuel failure AC power 6.) Failure of 'A' 6.) No SLC 6.} MSL break and 'C' EDG injection.
7.) Manual MSL output breakers isolation. 1 MSL to close. ~Solate. 7.) 'A' ADS fails to open
- 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1.) Failure of 'A' 1.) No SLC 1.) Manual MSL and 'e' EDG injection isolation output breakers to close.
2.) "A' ADS fails to open
- 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 1.)Recirc flow 1.~ Inadventent 1.) Uncoupled unit failure. H CI initiation control rod 2' 33E-6A FWH 2.) 'B' CRD flow 2.) 06L1'-52B FWLC failure b tu e leak. control valve failure 3.) Inverter 3.~ Trip of 'B' failure 71-INV-3A 3.) 02-3LT-101A R PT failure 4.) Loss of condenser 4.) UPS Bus vacuum failure
- 4. Major transients (1-2)
LOCA, Loss of ATWAS Fuel failure, MSL offsite AC power break, and ED
- 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 2)
Eon '" I EOP- 3 EOP-3, 5 and 6
- 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
EP-5 EP-5, EP-2, EP 10 4
~
- 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 3
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ~ames A. Fitzpatrick Date of Exam: 5/3/10 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I A M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E RO RX 2 1 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 1 1 D SRO-U IIC 4,5,8 3,4 5,8 7 4 4 X#1 MAJ 6,7 6,7 4 2 2 1 TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 E RX 2 2 2 1 1 RO X#2 NOR 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4,5, 2,3,5 6 4 4 2 D SRO-U 8 MAJ 6,7 6,7 4 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 1211 RO TRX 5 2 2 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 1 i 1 1 1 X#3 IIC 3 1,2,3 6 4 4 SRO-U 5,8 D MAJ 6,7 6,7 4 2 2 TS 1,4 2 0 2 RO RX 2 1 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 11 2 1 1 1
~I D
SRO-U IIC 4,5,6 2,3,4 6 4 MAJ 6,7 6 3 2 X#4 TS 3,4 2 0 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to thE! applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: James A. Fitzpatrick Date of Exam: 5/3/10 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E
~
2 3 2 1 1 0 RO 1 1 1 1 1 X#S SRO-I IIC 4.5, 5,7 5 4 4 2 D SRO-U 8 MAJ 6.7 6 3 2 2 D TS 0 0 2
==F6 RO RX 5 3 3 1 1 0 D
- ~
NOR 1 1 1 1 SRO-I X#6 II£"'. 3 9 4 4 2
~
5, SRO-U 6,7 6,7 5 2 2 1 D TS 2 0 2 2 RO RX 2 1 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 D I/C 4,5.8 .2,3,4 6 4 4
+/-+/-+/-
SRO-U MAJ 6,7 3 2 2 X#7 TS 3,4 2 0 2 RO D SRO-I X#8 SRO-U D m3 RX MAJ 5 6,7 3 1 2,3,4, 5,7 6 1 2 2 3,4,5, 9 8 6,7,9 6 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 2 0 1 2 1 TS 2,4 2 0 2 2 II Instructions:
- 3. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (1/C) malfunctions and one major tranSient, in the ATC pOSition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 4. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 James A. Fitzpatrick Date of Exam: 5/3/10 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I M C S A B S A B S A B S A B L U A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*) N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R I U T P E RO RX 2 3 2 3 1 1 0 0SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 1 1 X#9 IIC 4,5, 5,7 1,2,3 10 4 4 2 SRO-U 8 5,8 D MAJ 6,7 6 6 2 2 1 TS 1,4 2 0 2 2 0 RO SRO-I 0SRO-U RX NOR I/C MAJ BEE4 2 4 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 10 RO RX 1 1 0 0SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 0 0 SRO-U I/C MAJ TS
+/-0 4
2 2 12 2 1 RO RX 1 1 1 0 D SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 D I/C 4 I4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 0 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 5. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two lIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 6. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: James A. Fitzpatrick Date of Examination: 5/3/10 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS
#1 #2 #3 #4 RO 0 RO X RO 0 RO 0 0 SRO-I 0 SRO-I SRO-U X SRO-I SRO-U B SRO-I SRO-U X
0 SRO-U X Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 3-8 2 3 4 1-8 1 3-2 I3 4 2-8 1 3-2 3 1*8 4 IGJ 3* 2 2*7 3 4 InterpretlDiag nose
- 3 8 8 Events and Conditions Comply With and -8 1, 1- 2,5, 1- 1*8 2- 1*7
- 3 6,7, 8 8 Use Proced ures (1) 3-8 8 Operate Control 1,3-8
~a 2,5, 6,7, 2-8 1*7 Boards (2) 8 Communicate 1-8 1-8 1,- 1-8 1- 1-8 1- 1-8 i3 8 8 and Interact Demonstrate 1-8 1-8 1 8
Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and 3,4 1,4 3, 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants'license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES*301 Competencies Checklist Form ES*301*6 Facility: James A. Fitzpatrick Date of Examination: 5/3/10 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS
#5 #6 #7 #8 RO X RO RO RO SRO*I 0 SRO-I X SRO-I SRO-I X SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U X SRO-U 0 Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 ~ 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 3-8 2-7 3 2-7 2-8 3 2 3 2-7 1-8 8 8 7 8 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1-8 3,5, 1 1-7 2,5, 2 1 1 1-7 1, Use Procedures (1) 6,7 a 6,7, a 7 8 8 3-8 Operate Control 2-8 2,5, 2 2,5, 1 2 1.3 Boards (2) 6,7 a 6,7, 7 8 8 8
Communicate 1-8 1-8 1 1-7 1-8 1 1 1 1-7 1-8
~
8 8 8 and Interact Demonstrate 1-7 1 1-7 8
- Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and 2-4 3, 2-4 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter OnE~ or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: James A. Fitzpatrick Date of Examination: 5/3/10 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS
#9 RO D RO D RO D RO D SRO-I X SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U D SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 'I 2 3 4 1 -; 3 4 1 2 3 4 InterpretiDiagnose 3-8 2-7 1-8 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1-8 3,5, 1-8 6,7 Use Procedures (1 )
Operate Control 2-8 2,5, 6,7 Boards (2) Communicate 1-8 1-8 and Interact Demonstrate 1-8 Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: flr (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES*401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES*401*6 Facility: James A. Fitzpatrick Date of Exam: 5/25/2010 Exam Level: RO ~ SRolZI Initial Item Description a b* c#
- 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. 131 N/A ~
- 2. a.
b. NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. Bt N/A i
- 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with SE,ction D.2.d of ES-401 Af N/A
.~
4. 5. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled N/A N/A ' N/A rL as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
~he audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or x..
he audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the exam inations were developed independently; or
~he licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
")L ' ..
_ other (explain) ~J
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New N/A from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest <:.:::
new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. 19% / 28% 37% /36% ~4% / 36% ni ~\
- 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the HO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right.
Memory 43% / 36% CIA 57% / 64% &t N/A
-~,
- 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. Bi N/A ')\
- 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved N/A examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. At 'U
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. Ilt N/A ~A
- 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. Al N/A
~
Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Author ~H IlIA \~t k I +/-~l it Ld" 1tX!I1J."~ iJ.iidl s..U7//{)
~r--::e t:?&
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) _I'J/A c.
d. NRC Chief Examiner (#) NRC Regional Supervisor - ' I .f2.
!i!!;;;0 4'1.110 Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403*1 Quality Checklist Facility: .\tL'M.f.' A. Rt.l~-\r;,k Date of Exam: sl2s Ito Exam Level: RO: i SROX; Initials Item Descr!ption a b c
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading ~ 1:'/ f.., ~
V
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified M£ and documented NtA Pip.. M
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors
}J' Me (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) u/I>. ~
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, ~
as ajJplicable. +/-4% on the SRO-onlv) reviewed in detail ~/" A ., 111
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified MIA ~/k 'iJ.~ ~
V"r
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants ME:
tJ/t>. qv ~ Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader ~~ Ew.,ick l~~ ~ S(ZItl/IO
~~~~ t;t
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*) Sed ~ ~vt-r~f( 1/::;d-et; (p /t.o/lo n The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403*1 Quality Checklist Item Descri tion 1.
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s at check> 25% of examinations
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page~ 5 of 5}}