ML070590453

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Email from Epstein to Franovich Regarding Snow Storm and Nuclear Emergency Plan Article
ML070590453
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/25/2007
From: Epstein E
Three Mile Island Alert
To: Rani Franovich
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/REBB
References
TAC MD3021, TAC MD3022
Download: ML070590453 (3)


Text

~ani Fran~ovich~-Fwd-: Op-ed: Snow storm and nuclear emergency plan P

_-1 P 11 a -g I e From:

Eric Epstein <ericepstein@comcast.net>

To:

Rani Franovich <rlf2@nrc.gov>

Date:

02/25/2007 11:20:50 AM

Subject:

Fwd: Op-ed: Snow storm and nuclear emergency plan ow storm and nuclear emergency plan

Subject:

Op-ed: Snow storm and nuclear emergency plan February 24, 2007

Dear Editor:

As we thaw out from winter's icy grip, it has became apparent how

>> much

>> work needs to be done to prepare for sudden disasters. What happened

>> last week on 1-78 was the latest example of how ill prepared

>> Pennsylvania is

>> to handle an unannounced emergency. People were stranded for more

>> than

>> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in sub-freezing temperatures. How could Pennsylvania

>> have been

>> caught so off guard? Where was the Governor? Where was PEMA? Where

>> was the Lt. Governor who chairs the Pennsylvania Emergency

>> Management

>> Council?

The state has had 28 years to prepare for emergencies since pre-

>> school

>> children and pregnant women were evacuated from the Three Mile

>> Island-area

>> on March 30, 1979. While improvements have been made, these kids

>> remain unaccounted for in the event of another meltdown.

Katrina, this summer's flooding, and the most recent sn6w emergency

>> demonstrate that we are ill equipped to evacuate large populations

>> in the

>> event of a radiological emergency. If we can't get people off a

>> highway for

>> more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> due to snow and ice, how are we going to

>> evacuate an

>> entire population living in the 10 mile Emergency Planning Zone

>> around

>> a nuclear power plant?

After 9/11, TMI-Alert reviewed Pennsylvania's emergency plan and

>> found day care centers and nursery schools had been left out even

>> though

>> a 1984 federal law required their inclusion. TMIA filed suit at

>> the NRC. The

>> author of the 1984 NRC law, agreed with TMIA, and filed a formal

>> complaint.

>> This 40 year nuclear veteran recommended that the NRC compel the

>> Commonwealth to include preschool children and nursery schoolers in

1:Ranii-f rano-v-ich--- Fwd-: O0p-ed-: Snow storm and nucIe a r e-me rgendy-pl~an P

e 2ýj

>> the nuclear emergency plan, or risk losing their license.

The NRC denied TMIA's request that the NRC enforce its own law.

>> Governor Rendell, PEMA, and the nuclear industry continue to

>> argue that it

>> is not their responsibility to help these kids get out of harm's way.

Playing a nuclear shell game with children is not emergency

>> planning.

>> Sincerely,

>> Eric Epstein,

>> Chairman, TMI-Alert

>> 4100 Hillsdale Road

>> Harrisburg, PA 17112

>> (717)-541 -1101 or ericepstein@comcast.net Three Mile Island Alert, Inc., is a safe-energy organization

>> based in Harrisburg,

>> Pennsylvania and founded in 1977. TMIA monitors Peach Bottom,

>> Susquehanna,

>> and Three Mile Island nuclear generating stations.

)ONYiI, T MP Pa e 1'ý c:\\temp\\GW}OOOO1.TMP Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (45E1B75F.B29: 0 : 43817)

Subject:

Creation Date From:

Created By:

Fwd: Op-ed: Snow storm and nuclear emergency plan 02/25/2007 11:20:33 AM Eric Epstein <ericepstein@comcast.net>

ericepstein @comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOOI RLF2 (Rani Franovich)

Post Office OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:

Priority:

ReplyRequested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security:

Size 2815 15083 20804 Date & Time 02/25/2007 11:20:33 AM None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled