ML061530393

In-Process Inspection Survey Results for the Turbine Building Slab Area at the Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Rowe, Massachusetts (Docket No. 50-29; Rfta No.05-008)

ML061530393
Person / Time
Site:	Yankee Rowe
Issue date:	12/02/2005
From:	Adams W Oak Ridge Institute for Science & Education
To:	John Hickman NRC/NMSS/DWMEP
References
RFTA 05-008
Download: ML061530393 (8)

Text

December 2,2005 O R k E OAK RIDGE INSTITUTE F O R S C I E N C E AND E D U C A T I O N Quality Manager Tu k, Mr. John Hickman Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Two White Flint North Mail Stop: 7F27 1 1545 Roclcville Pike Rochlle, MD 20852-2738

-4%-

ATP

SUBJECT:

IN-PROCESS INSPECTION SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE TURBINE BUILDING SLAB AREA AT THE YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, R O W, MASSACHUSETTS [DOCKET NO. 50-29; RFTA NO. 05-0081

Dear Mr. Hickman:

The Environmental Survey and Site Assessment Program (ESSAP) of the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) performed in-process inspection survey activities on the Turbine Building (TB) concrete slab and excavation survey units at the Yankee Nuclear Power Station in Rowe, Massachusetts during the period of November 7 and 8,2005. These survey activities were requested and approved by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The survey activities included beta and gamma surface scans, direct measurements for beta activity, and soil sampling. Enclosed are the in-process survey results documenting these survey activities.

If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to me at (865) 576-0065 or Scott Kirk at (865) 574-0685.

Wade C. Adams Health Physicist/Proj ect Leader Environmental Survey and Site Assessment Program WCA:ar Enclosure cc:

T. McLaughlin, NRC/NMSS/TWFN T-7E18 E. Abelquist, ONSEESSAP E. box-Davin, NRC/NMSS/TwFN 8A23 J. Kottan, NRCRegion I S. Kirk, ORISE/ESSAP File/ 1672 Distribution approval and concurrence:

Technical Management Team Member I Initials-c

! &K. 3-u-3k P. 0. BOX I 17, OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE 3783 1-01 17 Managed and operated by Oak Ridge Associated Universities for the US. Department of Energy

IN-PROCESS INSPECTION SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE TURBINE BUILDING SLAB AREA AT THE YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ROWE, MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCTION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requested that the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Educations (ORISE) Environmental Survey and Site Assessment Program (ESSAP) perform an in-process inspection survey of the Turbine Building (TB) concrete slab and excavation area survey units (SU) at the Yankee Nuclear Power Station (YNPS). The in-process inspection surveys were performed during the period of November 7 and 8,2005. Figure 1 indicates the survey units that were part of these survey activities.

PROCEDURES The in-process inspection surveys were performed in accordance with a site-specific survey plan that was submitted to and approved by the NRC (ORISE 2005a). The ORISE/ESSAP Survey Procedures and Quality Assurance Manuals were also followed (ORISE 2004 and 2005b).

Turbine Building Concrete Slab Beta surface scans were performed using gas proportional detectors coupled to ratemeter-scalers with audible indicators. Surface scans were performed on up to 70% of the TB structural concrete surfaces. Particular attention was given to cracks, joints, and scabbled areas in the evaluated structural surfaces where material may have accumulated. Direct measurements for beta activity were performed at 30 random locations within the 10 TB SUs which were available for confirmatory survey activities. At the discretion of the NRC site representative, smear samples were deemed as not necessary. Locations where direct measurements were taken are indicated on Figure 1.

Turbine BuiIding Soil Excavations Gamma surface scans were performed on up to 90% of accessible portions of the TB soil excavations using sodium iodide (Nan scintillation detectors coupled to ratemeters with audible indicators. Soil samples were collected from five locations within the exposed soil excavations.

Locations where soil samples were taken are also indicated on Figure 1.

SAMPLE ANALYSIS ANI) DATA INTERPRETATION Radiological data and sample media were returned to ESSAPs laboratory in Oak Ridge, TN for analysis and interpretation. Radioassays were performed in accordance with the ESSAP Laboratory Procedures Manual (ORISE 200%). Soil samples were analyzed by gamma spectroscopy for the primary radionuclides of interest (i.e., CO-60 and Cs-137). However, spectra were also reviewed for other gamma-emitting fission and activation products associated with the YNPS and other identifiable total absorption peaks. Soil sample results were reported in units of Yankee Nuclear Power Station 1672Weports\\2005-12-02 In-Process Inspection Survey Results

picocuries per gram (pCi/g). Direct measurement data were converted to units of disintegrations per minute per 100 square centimeters (dpd100 cm2).

FINDINGS AND REXWLTS TBN-0 1 - 10 TBN-01-11 Turbine Building Concrete Slab

-77 to 710 490 to 620 Beta surface scans did not identify any areas of elevated activity on the TB concrete base structure. The ranges of direct measurement total net beta activity for each of these SUs are as follows:

TBN-0 1 - 12 TBN-01-13 TBN 14 420 to 850

-530

-1,060 to 680 b,

TBN 15 I

170 to 210 I

TBN-0 1 - 16

-54 to 550 II

~

TBN-0 1 - 17 I

0 to 610

~

"TBN = TurBiNe, the YNPS nomenclature for the Turbine Building Slab Area.

A complete listing of the direct measurement surface activity results is presented in Table 1.

Turbine BuildinE Soil Excavations Gamma surface scans identified one location of elevated direct gamma radiation on the soil surfaces. ESSAP collected five soil samples from the TB soil excavation areas, including one sample (sample 21) from the location identified by the surface scans to have elevated gamma activity. ESSAP requested that sample 21 be analyzed by the on-site Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) radioanalytical laboratory and the result was 210 pCi/g of CO-60. Further investigations by the licensee, and by the ESSAP laboratory, indicated that the elevated gamma activity was attributable to a discrete particle within the soil matrix. The range of radionuclide concentrations for the five soil samples collected by ESSAP (minus the discrete particle in sample 21) were 0.00 to 0.03 pCi/g for CO-60 and -0.01 to 0.12 pCi/g for Cs-137. A complete listing of the soil sample results is presented in Table 2.

Yankee Nuclear Power Station 1672\\Reports\\2005-12-02 In-Process Inspection Survey Results 2

SUMMARY

Since this was an in-process Confirmatory survey, the licensee did not have final status survey (FSS) data available for review. YNPS personnel provided preliminary direct measurement and soil sample results to ESSAP while on site.

Beta surface scans did not identify any areas of elevated beta activity on the TB concrete base structural surfaces. Direct measurements were performed at 30 locations and all results were well within the derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs) for CO-60 and Cs-137 as provided in the License Termination Plan [LTP (YAEC 2004)]. The direct measurement results were also within the gross beta activity DCGL as determined by YAEC personnel. Therefore, the results of the ESSAP survey activities for the remaining TB concrete slab confirmed that the radiological conditions were suitable for unrestricted use, based on a comparison to the cleanup criteria cited in the licensees LTP.

Gamma surface scans identified one location of elevated direct gamma radiation within the TB slab soil excavation. ESSAP personnel collected a soil sample (sample 21) from this location and had the sample analyzed by the YAEC on-site laboratory in the presence of ESSAP personnel.

The analytical result was 210 pCi/g for Co-60, which exceeds the site DCGL.

After ESSAF personnel left the site, YAEC personnel requested approval from the ESSAP site representative to open the sealed sample container for further analysis on sample 21. Permission was granted, however, the chain-of-custody (COC) for all of the samples was then considered to be breached. YAEC personnel segregated the clean soil from the discrete particle that was within the sample 21 matrix. The discrete particle was shipped in a separate container to ESSAF but was not analyzed by the ESSAP laboratory.

ESSAPs analytical results are considered qualified due to the COC breach; however, these results substantiated the findings from uncompromised ESSAP confirmatory scan data.

Furthermore, the TB slab soil excavation determinations remain unchanged. Based on the negligible amount of CO-60 and Cs-137 in sample 21 (minus the discrete particle), the elevated activity can be attributed to the discrete particle that had been removed from the sample matrix by YAEC personnel.

In conclusion, the in-process Confirmatory surveys determined that detectable activity, in excess of the soil DCGLs, was present in one soil sample within the TB slab soil excavation. Therefore, the results of the survey activities for the TB slab soil excavation failed to confirm that the radiological conditions were suitable for unrestricted use in accordance with cleanup criteria cited in the licensees LTP.

Yankee Nuclear Power Station 3

1672Weports\\2005-12-02 In-Process Inspection Survey Results

. 1672-006 (2)

I R

SO24 so25 TBN-OI -1 7 MEASUREMENT/SAMPLING LOCATIONS

1. SINGLE-POINT CONCRETE 1

1. SURFACESOIL CONCRETE N i)\\

24 FEET 0

1 8

METERS FIGURE 1 : Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Turbine Building Slab and Excavation -

Measurement and Sampling Locations Yankee Nuclear Power Station 4

1672\\Reports\\2005-12-02 In-Process Inspection Survey Results

TABLE 1 SURFACE ACTIVITY LEVELS TURBINE BUILDING CONCRETE SLAB Y A m E NUCLEAR POWER STATION ROWE, MASSACHUSETTS 5

-790 & 270' 6

800 & 350 7

710 & 350 TBN-01-09 3

370 & 330 4

-23 t 310 8

790 f 350 9

800 f 350 TBN-0 1 - 10 2

-77 2 310 10 710 t 350 11 I

140 f 320 TBN-01-11 16 620 +. 340 17 490 340 TBN-01-12 14 850 2 350 15 420 2 330 TBN-0 1-13 13

-530 & 280 Total Net Beta Activity (dpd1OO cm')

Survey Unit/

Locationa TBN-01-14 18 330 2 330 19 680 2 340 20 520 rtr: 340 25

- 1,060 2 250 26 280 2 330 TBN-01-15 21 190 & 320 23 210 f: 320 24 170 2 320 TBN-01-16 27 220 & 320 28 I

-542310 29 550 t 340 TBN-01-17 1

8 t310 12 260 & 320 22 O ? 310 30 610 & 340 I

d "Refer to Figure 1.

?BN= TurBiNe; the YNPS nomenclature for the Turbine Building Slab Area. The LTP DCGL values are 22,000 dpd100 cm2 for Cs-137 and 6,300 dpd100 cm2 for Co-60 and the Gross Beta DCGL is 9,800 dpd100 cm2.

'Uncertainties represent the 95% confidence level, based on counting statistics only.

dNot Applicable.

1672\\Reports\\2005-12-02 In-Process Inspection Survey Results 5

Yankee Nuclear Power Station

TABLE 2 RADIONUCLIDE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL SAMPLES TURBINE BUILDING SLAB EXCAVATION YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION R O W, MASSACHUSETTS aRefer to Figure 1.

b e

LTP DCGL values are 2.8 pCi/g for Cs-137 and 1.3 pWg for Co-60. The sample chain-of-custody was breached for these soil samples.

"This sample was analyzed on site by the YAEC laboratory and was determined to contain 210 pCi/g of Co-60. A discrete CO-60 particle was removed by YAEC personnel from the sample matrix. The discrete particle was not analyzed with the sample by the ESSAP laboratory.

duncertainties represent the 95% confidence level, based on total propagated uncertainties.

"zero values are due to rounding.

Yankee Nuclear Power Station 6

1672\\Reports\\2005-12-02 In-Process Inspection Survey Results

REFERENCES Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE). Survey Procedures Manual for the Environmental Survey and Site Assessment Program. Oak Ridge, Tennessee; September 2, 2004.

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Confirmatory Survey Plan for the Turbine Building Slab Area, Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Rowe, Massachusetts pocket No. 50-29; RFTA No. 05-0081. Oak Ridge, Tennessee; November 4,2005a.

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Quality Assurance Manual for the Environmental Survey and Site Assessment Program. Oak Ridge, Tennessee; July 28,2005b.

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Laboratory Procedures Manual for the Environmental Survey and Site Assessment Program. Oak Ridge, Tennessee; June 20,2005~.

Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC). Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) License Termination Plan (LTP) for the Yankee Nuclear Power Station (YNPS). Revision 1. Rowe, Massachusetts; November 2004.

Yankee Nuclear Power Station 1672\\Reports\\2005-12-02 In-Process Inspection Survey Results 7