IR 05000335/2002301

April 2002 Exam 50-335/2002-301 & 50-389/2002-301 Administrative Documents

ML021610226
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	04/22/2002
From:	Division of Reactor Safety II
To:	Florida Power & Light Co
References
50-335/02301, 50-389/02301
Download: ML021610226 (25)

Text

ST. LUCIE EXAM 2002-301 50-335 AND 50-0389/2002-301 APRIL 22, 2002 Administrative Documents 1. Exam Preparation Checklist ...... S............... ES-201-1 2. Exam Outline Quality Checklist ... ................ ES-201-2 3. Exam Security Agreement ....... ................ ES-201-3 4. Written Exam Quality Check Sheet ................ ES-401-7 5. Written Exam Review Worksheet .. ................ ES-401-9 6. Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist .... .... ES-403-1 7. Post-Exam Check Sheet ................ ........ ES-501-1 8. Record of Rejected K/As ................ . ES-401-10

C,,r-namin*;n Drarnartitnn flhsrklikt Form ES-201-1 (R8.S1)

ES-201 Mxam ;na+;on D mg aration Checklist Form ES-201-1 (R8 Sl)

Facility: '57-r *Zyri Date of Examination: V/a Z/A, Examinations Developed by: *Facility NRC (circleone)

Target Chief Date* Task Description / Reference Examiner's Initials-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)]

-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)

-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d) _ _

-30 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) Alp-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g) (

-7 13. Written examinations and o approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification lette They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility license Applies only to examinations prepared by the NR ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description a b" c

/ I a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-40 wR b. Assess whether the outline was systematically prepared and whether all knowledge and ability sample categories are appropriately T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics T

E N d. Assess whether the repetition from previous examination outlines is excessiv / ,jb.) a. Using Form ES-301-5, verily that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transient ý11A '4,'

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or /

significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)', 4A//A 10,,

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive day c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix '-14 AIfA a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, from the applicants' audit test(s), and 4 tasks are duplicated (3)* no more T (4) no than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam bank b. Verily that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, /

(3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and W (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RC c. Verily that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based , ,, I activities, ,

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of AIA N/#

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive day . a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sectio G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriat N Ym, 4 (

RI A

E Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least Check for duplication and overlap among exam section L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverag f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). b-Printed /.-ature De b. Facility Reviewer(*)NRC-developedexAminatin s d-r-J . * _

c . C hie f Exa m in er * . / l l * *f-/

d. NRC supervisor ",',,-, Im/ 7

• )Notapplicable for NRC-developed examination of 24 NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of . 22- 4s of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of V-x.g.Z- From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NR PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE 2...A L7 OA C-TY r O e_,p_-22 /0f - o2

-. e.4 4.

5. _,JLu*...t i__ 3. G )

• _ - aS

,--- ----

->C~Y.I~~-----------.-- - ,,.41AO

-.------ --.. ,-2f,_l1Z

CC ,,--,-----_-._

,.C,M.-..,.-C , oil "A* -----

' .--

_L"_,-- Ot.

6. _SCoTr 0EW9Pa-a AMPS ,/gte~iEfW - - 2354 cik 4 7. _ L je_& v*t_*_ ---- _--. .. . . - -- -- -- --

1 (

1 c C k NOTES: A *. EY7YJ45 4% -e r$4V 11ýe 2'

2- 2-44d 0Ž r< % 4~ YP /./

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination I acknovwedge that I have acquired speciaUzed knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of //'2204sof 1he date of my signatLre. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been nuth ed by the NRC chief examiner. I undlerstand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be admnislered these tensing examinatlons from tlis date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted, below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, Iam aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as docunented in the faciity licensee's procedures) and understand that violafion of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancelation of the examinations anddor an enforcement aclion agairst me or the facility licensee. I will Immediately report to faclity management or lhe NRC chief examiner any indications of suggestions that examination security may have been compromise . Post-Examination To the best of my knov*eae. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC icensing examinations administered during the wee(s) of TS-0L,- From the date that I eralred into this security agreernant Lutil the completion of examination admnistrationi, I did nolt instuct, evaluate, or provide performance Feedback to those apicants who were administered these lcensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NR PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SJGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE llJ44Y XIYIV 14~l IV yJ___

a. Sc.o1Tr oF-gA.la Anrsk 02e-i T & ~. . ...

10.-12Isb 8,-Supplement 1 24f-fC24 11 ______ ct 5_ *yflcdHA ide 12ý r____0r~WAb NOTES: A le6a. WET?'t S -'P~V Aan NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24of(24

ES-201natio Examrnation Sac rement-Security Agreerent Form ES-20 -3 -3 Pr-Examination I acknowledge that I have aquired specialized knowledge aboul the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 2-asof the -

date of my signature. I agree thait Iwill not knowingly divuge anyinformalionwabout these ex-minatIls to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that Iam not to Instruct evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until conmpletlon of examination administration. except as specifically noted, below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of theconditions of this agreement mayyresult in cancellation of the examInalions and/or An enforcement action against me or the facilitylicensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examineranyindlcations or suggestions that m-4 examination secunWty may have been compromise W PosI-Exeninnlion To the best of my knowiedge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during file wek(,s)o % . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination Administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to ihose applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NR PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE e.(. 0

"<--F__ -__' * ' --** - _-_- __T____ L__ ___ .Z *"

COT& AIP _ _ _ _

Xcsa_

4-.  %.

8. _--,,__l___^,_, __ .--_ ,,,:.,-*'" 'L ","*-"'I*._,* 0-4c, l a ý _

9, ._' Par ___

C 1O. hAftE L. IF S MP!EVIJ 04"t *. , _ , "-- 61.*ICC

• iW6_

W / ICtA -P __ A- ~ 477WCH46 Slcfcr Xfl Ws2__

1 SfVt U& rL I 15 6A

'00'e (~yM L~AC)tA,., tui Spqn~t~

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 cif 24

( {

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of _-22 ,-as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of ."- 22 0 4,-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NR PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNA RE (2) D NOTE 1. Vo (L_* L "3 A/..Q,O'.. SIE ()

2. Bo * Lokvev,r Ons Tri,.4r J-wst-.ctor S"1 As/e sO/s r-jvwucT 3. ..lCNCL2.. PeTnTrsctJ 4.~ eieo, TOES N-til-2 5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

1 .

1 .

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO/SRO Initial Item Description a b- ct Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility ,cc O a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available _' RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

- the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or 7 the examinations were developed independently; or

- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

- other (explain) Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right y310A* 141! References/handouts provided do not give away answers ,W-/ Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified 1 Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines ,_ &

1 The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet 4?

Printed Name/Iignaur Date a. Author 2/vt,'t 1' ,C-,r 3°/.- b. Facility Reviewer () . A ,'P S-c, c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)..., 4,y .

d. NRC Regional Supervisor( & aa .&/r- %6!ZL012 Note: * The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examination # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-9 (R8, Si)

Review Worksheet . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD I Prl (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- 0= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis Link units I ward K/A Only Instructions

[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive leve . Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable), Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

' The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

• The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statement More than one distractor is not credibl One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The uestion is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).

• The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirement . Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-onlv (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable). Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory? At a minimum, explain any "U"ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

0# LOK LODI[ I (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia units #1 Back-ward K/AQ= SROOnly U/EIS Explanation Focus Dis Link I

.ROISRO COMBINED QUESTIONS 1 F 2 S 051AA2.02 NEW 2 F 2 X U 057AA1.05 NEW; How does this question relate to loss of vital AC instrument bus? Facility will replace the question. Facility rewrote the question to reflect the loss of vital AC instrument bu Question is now SATISFACTORY . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

O# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- 0= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis Link units ward K/A Onl _

3 H 3 X E 06BAK3.13 NEW; State in stem that reference provided. Stem clarification needed to ensure that applicants know that plant has been shutdown and cooldown is in progress. Stem will state reference is provided and a cooldown is in progress. Facilitystates applicants will know the plant is shutdown since the control room is being evacuate Facility has modified the stem to reflect that a cooldown is in progress from the shutdown panel and that references are provide Question is now SATISFACTORY 4 H 2 S 026AK3.02 NEW 5 F 2 X E 076AA2.02 NEW; Distractors do not seem credible. References not sufficient to determine if distractors are credible. Could Distractor 'B'

also be considered correct? Facility stated that all distractorsare credible since they deal with gas management Distractor'B' is not also correctsince there is no proceduralinterrelationshipbetween waste gas and the flashtank. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 6 F 3 S 059G2.3.10 BANK (R); Could not find on the 2000 NRC exam. May have been a question that was replacedas a result of exam security issues on the 2000 NRC exam. No question modification was necessa Question is now SATISFACTORY 7 H 3 X E 015AA2.10 NEW; Does the IA containment isolation valve shutting cause a loss of IA to the CCW valves, even ifthe rest of the IAheader is still pressurized? If valve shuts all IA to containment is lost. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 8 H 3 S 063K3.02 BANK 9 F 2 S 015K4.07 NEW 10 F 2 S 072A3.01 BANK 11 F 2 X U 003AK3.06 NEW; K/A is knowledge of the reason for reseting the demand position counter. This question does not capture the K/ Facility explained that the K/A was tested in showing the demand position counters have to be reset otherwise the indicate improper position. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 12 H 3 S 013K1.15 NEW; When does AFW start feeding the SIG? Time delay of 4 minutes after S/G's get to 19%. No question modification necessar F 1 X X E 103K3.03 NEW; Enhancement needed on the distractors. The correct (2) answer is very obvious. Facilitywill rewrite the question. The question was rewritten. Difficulty level of the question has been raise to (2).

Question is now SATISFACTORY . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.7.

Q# LOK LODII (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis Link unts ward KJA Only 14 F 2 S 008K4.02 NEW 15 H 3 X U 01 IK6.03 BANK (R); How does this question relate to the loss or malfunction of the PZR level system required by the K6 topic? Question will be changed to address the K/A. Question was modified to approach the same subiect/content as before with an emphasis on PZR level system malfunctio Question is now SATISFACTORY 16 H 2 X U 010A3.02 NEW; The stem states that the Pressurizer spray controller fails to 100% output therefore, the spray valves would obviously be open reducing this question to only having one credible distractor. Question determined to be satisfactory since facility has some reverse acting controllers and this questions tests the applicant'sknowledge that the spray valve controlleris not reverse acting although the heatercontroller is. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 17 H 3 X X E 012A1.01 NEW; Distractor symmetry, 1isdistactor has four the rest have three, LPD appears in all distractors making it a given. Facility will fix the distractors. Distractor 'B' modifie Question is now SATISFACTORY 18 F 2 S 059K6.12 NEW 19 F 2 S 006K1.04 BANK 20 H 2 S 079A2.01 BANK (R)

21 F 3 X E 033K4.01 BANK; Add word to the stem to ensure that the applicants know that the answer must be what is required lAW procedure ONP 1 0350030. Facilitywill make the suggested changes. Facility corrected the ste Question is now SATISFACTORY 22 F 2 S 078K1.05 NEW 23 F 2 X E 086A3.01 NEW; State in the stem that pressure is stable, if it is assumed that pressure will continue to decrease due to the spray valve still being stuck open then answer 'D' can be considered to be correct eventuall Facilitywill correct the stem to state that the spray valve is stuck partially open and pressure has stabilized. Facility corrected the ste Question is now SATISFACTORY 24 H 2 S 005A2.02 NEW 25 H 2 S 041K6.03 MOD

1 . Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred,. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- i= SRO U/EIS Explanation 26 H 3 X E 028AK2.02 MOD; Distractor 'D' is not credible. Facilitywill modify distractor'0' to be credible. Facility modified distractor 'D' to show a equipment status to be consistent with each othe Question is now SATISFACTORY 27 H 4 S 061K2.01 MOD 28 F 3 X E 061G2.4.11 NEW; Statement in the stem that the 'C' AFW pump has experienced an overspeed trip. The procedure calls the 'AS' switch the

'AFAS AB' and states the position is 'BYPAS' vice 'Bypass'. Suggest changing distractor '0' to mechanical overspeed only and steam supply valves. Stem modification is not necessary due to nature of when the AS Bypass is used. Facilitywill make suggested change to distractor

'D'. Facility made the modification to distractor 'D'.

Question is now SATISFACTORY 29 H 1 E 039K3.05 NEW; This question lacks discriminating value. Facilitystated (2) this question tests the applicant'sunderstandingof the secondary plants affect on the primary plantpost trip. No question modification was necessary, level of difficulty raised to a (2).

Question is now SATISFACTORY 30 H 3 S 004K2.05 MOD 31 H 2 X S 003A2.01 BANK 32 H 3 S 001K1.05 MOD; Question stem and distractors are not changed significantly from existing question therefore, should not be categorized as modified. Question source changed from mod to bank.

33 F 2 X E 071 K5.04 BANK; NOP 2-0530020 states that prompt action LAW ONOP 2-0530030 is required at 2%. The actions for >2% are subsequen actions and not immediate actions as asked for in the stem. Some stem modification may be needed to ensure the correct answer is solicite Facilityfeels the stem does not need to be modified and the applicants are trainedto know that prompt action and immediate action are completely different. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 34 F 2 X S G2.2.27 NEW 35 H 3 X X X U G2.1.11 NEW; Question does not meet the KA for knowledge on one (F) (2) hour TIS. Question distractors do not seem credible that allowing both airlock doors to be open at the same time is acceptable. Faclity will rewrite the question. Question was rewritten, level of knowledge is now fundamental (F) and level of difficulty is now a (2).

Question is now SATISFACTORY

, . Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

O# LOK [0LOfDE '

(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Ds Lnk units ward K-A Only 36 F 2 X E 026K4.07 BANK; Distractors 'A' and 'B' lack credibility. Facility explained how distractors WA' and B' could be consideredas having an affect on NPSH to the containment spray pumps, Noquestio modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 37 F 1 X X E 056A1.08 NEW; Wording of distractors 'B' and 'C' need to be modified to (2) ensure credibility. Change the word 'low' in distractor 'D' to 'lube'. The correct answer seems obvious in light of the wording of the distractor More information on existing plant conditions added to the stem could increase the credibility of the distractors and raise the difficulty level to an acceptable value. Facility will correct distractor'D'. Facility determinedthat no stem modification was necessary since the specific plant conditions were supplied within the distractorstherefore, distractors

'B' and 'C' were viable distractors. Wording in distractor 'D' was corrected. Discussions with the facility concerning main feedwater pump trips resulted in determining this questions level of difficulty being increased to (2). It was also determined that the wording of the distractors did not give unnecessary cues to the correct answe Question is now SATISFACTORY 38 F 2 X X E G2.1.29 BANK (R): For answer 'A' to be correct it must be assumed that the valve is taken back to full open prior to the 1/4 tum closed agai Distractor 'B' what is meant by 'one tum fully close', should this be 'one full turn in the closed direction'? Stem clarification may be needed in order to specify if the area is accessible. Correctionswill be made to the distractors. No stem modification is necessary, applicantswould be incorrect to assume the area inaccessible without that type of information being given in the stem. Wording in distracts 'A' and 'B'

correcte Question is now SATISFACTORY 39 F 3 S 065AA2.06 NEW 40 H 4 X X E 037AA2.16 NEW; Does this question require Steam Tables to be provided as a reference? Steam tables will be provided as a referenc No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 41 F 2 S 029K4.03 BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q0 LOK LOD -

(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- 0= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus D Likunits ward K/ nly 42 F X CE/A13AK2.2 BANK; Reference material does not support the correct answer, the reference material seems to elude to the premise that the other distractors are incorrect therefore there can be only one correct answer. Is the question asking for 'greater control' or 'quicker control'

since the Unit 2 MOVs are immediately available. Facilitywill review this question and look for supportingdocumentation. Facility will address the issue of quicker control vice greatercontroL Facility modified the stem to say 'control' vice 'quicker control', this modification made distractor 'A'

also correct. Facility further modified the stem after NRC commen Question is now SATISFACTORY 43 F 2 X U 054AA1 .02 NEW; Question focus is on the automatic start of the AFW (H) system vice manual start as specified inthe K/A. Correct answer is the only answer that delineates an automatic feature. Facility will rewrite this question. Question was rewritten to address the K/A. Questions level of knowledge is now higher order (H).

Question is now SATISFACTORY 44 H 2 S 009AK3.10 NEW 45 H 3 S 027AA2.10 NEW 46 F 2 X E 008AK1.01 BANK; Does this question require Steam Tables to be provided as a reference? No answer documentation provided. Steam tables will be provided and is the only reference document needed to support the correct answer. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 47 H 3 X E G2.2.3 NEW; Distractor 'B' wording should be changed from 'kept below 50%' to 'less than 50%' or 'maintained less than 50%'. Correction will be made. Correction made to distractor 'B'.

Question is now SATISFACTORY 48 F 1 X X U CE/A16AKG2.4.4 BANK; SRO level knowledge? This question is (2) unacceptable due to low level of difficulty. Question stem also needs to provide RCP controlled bleedoff flow mismatch in order to meet all entry conditions for ONP-0120031. Must be assumed that all instrumentation is functioning properly, since the stem does not address this distractor B' may be considered correct. Facilitystated that this is SRO only knowledge. All entry conditions are met for entering the ON Applicants would be incorrectto assume instrumentationis malfunctioning without that specific information being provide Question modification was not necessary. Question test knowledge level of the SRO 10CFR55.43.(b)(5). From discussions with the facilit questions level of difficulty determined to be level (2).

Question is now SATISFACTORY . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO UIE/S Explanation Focus Dis Link units ward K/A On ly 49 F 3 X U G2.3.10 NEW; This question does not deal with the ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure. This question addressesthe second part of the K/A in guarding againstpersonnel exposure. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 50 F 1 X E G2.1.22 BANK; This questions difficulty level needs to be increase (2) Facility wi/ replace this question. Question was rewritten to make the question more operationally oriented and increased the difficulty level to iL Question is now SATISFACTORY 51 F 3 X S G2.2.22 NEW 52 H 3 X E 024AK1.02 NEW; Without a time frame specified, answer 'D' can be argued as correct since reactor power is ultimately set by steam demand, given enough time then reactor will return to 10% power at a lower Tavg. Must state assuming no rod motion and boron concentration same at BOL and EOL. The boron addition will show more as a temperature change and less as a power change. Facility will make changes to ensure distractor'D' is not also correct and make necessary changes to the stem. Question stem modified, the question states the SBCS is in auto and no other reactivity changes are in affec Question is now SATISFACTORY 53 H 3 X X X E CEIA1 1AK1.2 NEW; Answer 'D' is also correct. Step 12 of EOP-05 requires that the affected SIG be isolated per Appendix R, which manually isolates all feedwater flow to that SIG. Without specifying where the SIG levels are at answer 'C' could also be argued as correct if it is assumed that 'B' level is between 60% &70%. Will add words to th stem to have the applicantsknow that answer must addressthe 'major mitigatingstrategy'. Question stem modified to include SIG levels and ensure that the applicants answer must address the "maior mitigating strategy."

Question Is now SATISFACTORY 54 H 2 X E 002A4.03 NEW; Steam tables should be provide as a reference and state in the stem that references are provided. Distractors 'B' and 'D' are not credible since there is no combination of number manipulation between temperatures and pressures to obtain 40F as a result, instantly eliminating them as possible answers. Correctionsmade to distractors

'B' and '0' changes 40 to 35. Steam tables provided. Corrections made to distractors 'B' and 'D'.

Question is now SATISFACTORY

1 . Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5.Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0 SRO UIE/S Explanation JFocus I Ds Link I unitsj ward I/A Only 55 F 1 X E 011 EK2.02 NEW; Correct answer is the only one with LPSI flow making (2) the question extremely easy, too many non-credible distractor Recommend putting LPSi flow in one of the incorrect distractor Changes to the distractorswill be made. Added LPS1/to distractor'B' in place of HPSI and added HPSI to distractor'C' in place of break flo Corrections made to distractors 'B' and 'C'. Question level of difficulty is now (2).

Question is now SATISFACTORY 56 H 1 X U 055EK1 .02 NEW; Distractors are not credible. All distractors are definite (2) indications that natural circulation is in progress. Question does not provide discriminatory value. Facilitysignificantly modified this question. Question modification has increased the level of difficulty to Question Is now SATISFACTORY 57 H 4 X E 040EA2.1 NEW; K/A is not 040EA2.1, it is CE/E05EA2.1. Stem should (X) specify if SIAS has been actuated. This question should be designated as SRO only. Facilitywill modify the stem to state an S/AS has occurred and will designate the question as SRO only. Facility has modified the questio Question is now SATISFACTORY 58 H 4 S 055EA1.06 NEW 59 H 2 X S 040EA1.3 NEW; K/A is not O40EA1 .3, it is CEIE05EA1.3. Reference material provided does not show the correct flow path through the Standard Post Trip Actions Diagnostic Flow Chart. Reference material was in error Facility agreed the reference material was in error and verified the correct flow path through SPTA supports the correct answer no question modification was necessary.

60 H 3 X X X E CE/EO9EA1.3 BANK; Question stem provides information that emergency boration was not successful indicating that Standard Post Trip actions have already been implemented therefore, the correct path would be to EOP-15. May be better to specify plant conditions that the applicant must determine that emergency boration will not be possibl Facility stated that immediate action is to attempt emergency boration prior to officially entering the SPTA and must officially perform the SPTA prior to a transition to any other EOP. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 61 F 2 X E 038EK2.02 NEW; Stem should ask what is an automatic action of a SGTR that has caused the RM-26-5 and 26-6 monitors to alarm. Stem modification is not necessary since this is the only automaticaction that occurs all other distractorsare manual actions. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job ContentFlaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist Link units ward j/AOny 62 H 3 S OO7EK1.2 NEW; K/A is not 007EK1.2, it is CE/E02EK1.2. Fix typo, the word "attempt" in the stem should be "attempts." Facilitywill correct the typo. Typo in question stem corrected 63 F 2 S 056AK3.02 NEW 64 H 3 X X E G2.1.32 NEW: Question stem is unclear and poorly worded. More information needs to be added to the stem in order to create a more realistic operational setting (situational) in order to solicit the correct answer. Stem willbe modified. Question stem modified by supplying more relevant plant condition Question is now SATISFACTORY 65 H 2 X X S G2.4.41 NEW; Fix typo, the word "buss" in the stem should be "bus."

Facility will correctthe typo. Typo in question stem corrected 66 F 2 S G2.4.40 NEW 67 H 2 X X X E G2.3.11 BANK; More plant conditions are needed to prevent having to make assumptions about number of RCPs running, condition of S/Gs, etc. Step 11 of EOP-04 supports answer 'D' as also being correc Facilitystates that the number of RCP's running is not relevant until pressure is at SIAS actuation, condition of S/G can be determined from the Th temperature, and distractor'0' is not correctat this pressure (need block permissives). No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 68 F 3 S G2.2.12 NEW 69 F 3 X X E G2.3.9 NEW; Distractors 'A' and 'C' are not credible. The Containment Purge Fans are never used at power and have the associated breakers in OFF in Modes 1-4. It is not acceptable to have more than one distractor as not credible. Unit I uses the containmentpurge fans under this type of situation making distractors credible. No questio modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 70 F 3 X S G2.3.6 NEW 71 F 3 X U G2.4.49 NEW; This does not address the knowledge required by the K/A. This question is not written at the correct knowledge level. This is not an SRO only question and therefore, should be written on the RO/SRO level. The question stem phrases the question as if the applicant is the SRO. The K/A require the applicant demonstrate the ability to perform without reference immediate operation of system components and controls vice why some other operator has performed an action. Question to be rewritten. Question was rewritten to test the knowledge required by the K/A and at the appropriate license leve Question is now SATISFACTORY

Q#

I4 LOK~ LOD . Psychometric Flaws II 4. Job Content Flaws fI 5. Other 6 (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ 1Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis Link units ward K/A On '

72 H 2 X X X E G2.4.11 NEW; Distractor 'D' does not specify a procedure to implement as specified in the stem. Only one procedure is given as a choice for implementation in the other distractors. The initial conditions in the stem along with the note prior to step 7.2.1 of 2-0440030 indicates that the LMONP would not need to be implemented. Distractor'0' will be corrected. Note at step 7.2.1 means that the LMONP will not be fully implemented step 7.2. 1 states that the LMONP safety function status will have to be checked. Distractor 'D' was modifie Question is now SATISFACTORY 73 F 2 X X X E G2.4.7 NEW; Step 4 of EOP-06 which stops all RCPs also reduces RCS pressure to 1800-1850 psia which reduces subcooling margin therefore, making answer 'B' partially correct. Without specific conditions being given in the stem it can be assumed that there is no Main Feedwater Pumps running in step 8.B.3 of EOP-06. Ifthis is assumed then in accordance with step 8.3.3 Contingency Actions, answer 'A' is also correct. Without specific conditions being given in the stem it can be assumed that S/G levels are < 15% WR and Tc is rising and implementation of EOP-06 step 10 contingency action is appropriate and therefore, answer 'D' would not be correct. S/G levels will be specified to ensure that distractors 'A' and 'D'arenot correct. Distractor'B' is not an action that mitigatesthe event. Question stem modified to include S/G level Question is now SATISFACTORY 74 H 4 X X E 025G2.2.3 NEW; K/A is not 025G2.2.3, it is 025AG2.2.3. Question stem is vague, more information needs to be added to solicit the correct answer. Can not determine what is being asked without looking at the answer selection. Stem should state that the conditions exist on both units, using the chart below, state a specific failure, etc. this would avoid having to make assumptions. Facilitystated that the applicants should not have a problem determining what the question is asking. No question modification was necessar Suestion is now SATISFACTORY 75 F 2 X E 028K5.03 BANK; Zirctwater reaction is the only one that appears twice in the answer choices indicating that this is most likely the correct answer reducing the question to 50/50. Reference material supplied does not support Zirc/water as being the largest contributor of hydrogen concentration. Facility will provide reference materialto support the correctanswer. Distractorsdetermined to be OK. No questio modification was necessary, appropriate reference material was provide Question is now SATISFACTORY . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis Link units ward KA Only 76 F 3 X E 058AA1.01 NEW; Wording of distractors 'A'and 'B' not consistent with the other two distractors. Distractor 'A' seems to be partially correct in that it is capable to power the 1A DC bus from the lAB DC bus since the 1B DC bus is powering the lAB DC bus via normally closed breaker Interlock prevents distractor'A' from being correct. Distractorwording determined to be acceptable. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 77 F 2 S 064K1.03 NEW 78 H 3 X X E G2.1.33 NEW; K/A is not G2.1.33, it is 026EG2.1,33. Question does not test the knowledge required by the K/A. The K/A requires the applicant to recognize indications which require entry level into Tech Specs, the question stem tells the applicant that a Tech Spec condition exists. Question will be rewritten. Question was rewritten to test the knowledge required by the K/ Question is now SATISFACTORY 79 H 2 X X E 069AA2.01 NEW; Indicate in the stem that references are provide Refueling canal status should be given otherwise an adjustment is needed per figure 1C of the reference material. Are the curves associated with the time to boil applicable after core refueling? Canal status is not applicable since head will be on at thisjuncture. The curves are always applicableand are subsequently very conservative after refueling. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 80 F 3 S 074EA1.05 NEW 81 F 2 X E 062AK3.02 NEW; Second part of the distractors focus on the S/G blowdown heat exchanger and nothing is mentioned about the turbine cooling water. Distractor 'B', blowdown is not used during the SGTR mitigation. Distractor 'A', S/G sampling is not cooled by the ICW. S/G blowdown provides for better distractorsthan turbine cooling wate Distractors'A' and 'B' would indicate multiple concept error. Noquestion modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 82 H 3 S 062K3.02 NEW 83 F 3 S 022A3.01 BANK 84 F 3 S 032G2.1.27 BANK; K/A is not 032G2.1.27, it is 032AG2.1.27. Corrected 85 H 3 S 067G2.4.26 BANK; K/A is not 067G2.4.26, it is 067AG2.4.2 Corrected 86 H 3 S 022AA1.01 NEW . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 67.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- MinutiaI #/ IBack- 0 SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis Link units ward K/A Only0 87 F 2 X X U O60AA2.05 NEW; Question stem is worded such that an action answer is expected when the correct answer is no action occurs, this is negative training. The K/A should be re-sampled since the ARMs do not have any associated automatic actions. Question rewritten. Question was rewritten, the K/A did not need to be change Question is now SATISFACTORY 88 H 3 X E 025AK2.03 NEW; Stem enhancement to ensure that the applicants know the RCS is vented. Applicant will know from plant conditions provide No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 89 H 2 X E 061AK3.02 NEW; The question stem asks for consequences of the alarm the distractors state the cause. Consequence is that the alarm is inoperable. Question acceptable. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 90 H 1 X X X U 017A2.02 NEW; Question does not test at the level required for an SRO (2) license. Distractors 'B' and 'D' are not credible in that Feeding and Steaming S/G's during a LOCA would be better than increasing ECCS flow. Reference material does not support that CET of 22F superheat confirms the fact that core damage has occurred therefore, replace the word 'confirm' with 'suspected' in the stem. Stem fixed to reflect suspected core damage. Distractor'B' and 'D' determined to be credible. Question stem was modified. The question level of difficulty determined to be (2).

Question is now SATISFACTORY 91 H 3 S 068K1.01 NEW 92 H 3 S 029EK2.06 NEW 93 H 2 X E 073K5.01 NEW; Distractors have two parts, the second part is being used to convince the applicant into selecting this answer and is not asked for in the stem. Stem corrected. Question stem was modifie Question is now SATISFACTORY 94 H 2 X U 015A4.03 NEW; Question does not address the K/A required knowledge in showing the applicant's ability to manually operate or monitor trip bypasses. (No indication or manual manipulation asked for.) Facility explained that the question matches the K/A. No question modification was necessar Question is now SATISFACTORY 95 H 3 X U 001AK1.17 NEW; Question is not operationally based and test at the GFE level. Stem will be corrected to provide an operationalbasis. The question stem was modified to address the K/A while providing the applicant with an operational basi Question is now SATISFACTORY . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6 7.

O# LOK LOD (F/H) I(1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO UIEIS Explanation Focus Dis I Link I Iunits ward KIA Onl 96 H 2 S 014A1.03 NEW 97 H 4 X S 005G2.2.22 NEW; KJA is not 005G2.2.22, it is 005AG2.2.22. Corrected.

98 H 2 S 035A4.05 BANK: Reference material provided does not support the correct answer. Properreference materialwill be provided.

99 H 3 X E 022K3.02 BANK; Distractors have two parts, the second part is being used to convince the applicant into selecting this answer and is not asked for in the stem. Stem will be corrected to also ask why, Question stem was modifie Question is now SATISFACTORY 100 F 1 X E 027G2.4.21 NEW; Question does not test at the level required for an (3) SRO license. Distractors 'C' and 'D' are not credible inthat containment spray flow would be termination criteria for containment spra Distractors 'C' and 'D' will be modified to be more credible. Distractors were modified to provide better discriminating value, as a result question level of difficulty was increased to (3).

Question is now SATISFACTORY

Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 ES-403 Quality Checklist

, Lc C Date of Exam: V-,?22" 02- Exam Level: RO HO Facility:

Initials a b c Item Description before gradingA I Clean answer sheets copled Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors j{. 5, (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail

/ d All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades /

are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of tL !

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date a. Grader ,2 . , ,231J, b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ,7t't d. NRC Supervisor (* M)CHAEýL &Z M7tFJ/4d/tC____

AV by the (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded NRC; two independent NRC reviews are reguire of 5 NUREG-1 021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-501 Post-Examination Check Sheet Form ES-501-1 (R8, S1)

Task Description Date Complete Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and verified complete 1(,02 Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed, if necessary / z Operating tests graded by NRC examiners dA NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test grading completed _ _ _ _ Responsible supervisor review completed L/ a Management (licensing official) review completed / /o 7/ License and denial letters mailed " " Facility notified of results / aG./at Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 0610) "- /o 2 1 Reference material returned after final resolution of any appeals Y/l* (/J/ I.-

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/A's Form ES-401-10 Tier/Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejected K/A's 1/1 G2.2.26 Refueling Adm. Requirements not applicable to inoperable/stuck CEA 1/1 011.EK2.01 K/A < /1 015.AA2.05 K/A < /1 015.AA2.04 K/A < /1 G2.4.29 Not applicable to loss of CCWS 1/1 057.AK2 Changed from AK2 to AK3 due to AK2 K/A's < /1 057.AA1.03 No steam driven Main Feedwater pumps at PSL 1/2 025.AK2.10 K/A < /2 025.AK2.08 K/A < /2 025.AK2.07 K/A < /2 025.AK2.12 K/A < /2 G2.2.29 Not applicable to loss of RHR 1/2 G2.1.34 Not applicable to loss of RHR 1/2 038.EK2.01 K/A < /2 038.EK2.03 K/A < /2 038.EK2.04 K/A < /2 038.EK2.05 K/A < /2 038.EK2.06 K/A < /2 038.EK2.07 K/A < /2 065.AA2.07 PSL has no back-up N2 supply on loss of instrument air 1/2 028.AK2.06 K/A < /2 028.AK2.01 K/A < /1 001 .K1.07 K/A < /1 004.K2.04 PSL has no BWST heaters 2/1 022.K3.03 K/A < /1 026.K6 Changed from K6 to K4 due to all K6 K/A's < NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/A's Form ES-401-10 Tier/Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejected K/A's 2/1 056.A1.08 Manually picked A1.08 due to all other K/A's < /1 059.K6.12 Manually picked K6.12 due to all other K/A's <2.5 or N/A for PSL 2/1 063.K6 Changed from K6 to K3 due to all K6 K/A's < /1 068.A2.03 Boric acid evaporators not used 2/2 006.K1.10 No Safety Injection tank heating system at PSL 2/2 011.K6.11 K/A < /2 028.K4 Changed from K4 to K5 due to no K4 K/A's 2/2 086. K2 Changed from K2 to A3 due to no K2 K/A's 2/2 103.K2 Changed from K2 to K3 due to no K2 K/A's NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1