Text

Initial Exam 2009302 Final Admin Documents
	ML15142A400
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	05/21/2015
From:	; NRC/RGN-II
To:	; Florida Power & Light Co
References
	Download: ML15142A400 (78)
	v • d • e

FACILITY NAME: Lucie Section 7 REPORT NUMBER: 2009 -302 FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS CONTENTS:

Li Exam Preparation Checklist (ES-201-1)

LI Final Exam Outline Quality Checklist (ES-201 -2)

LI Exam Security Agreements (ES-201 -3)

LI Final Administrative Topics Outline (ES-301 -1)

L1 Final Control Room & Walk-Through Test Outline (ES-301 -2)

LI Final Operating Test Quality Check Sheet (ES-301 -3)

Li Final Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet (ES-301 -4)

LI Final Transient and Event Check Sheet (ES-301 -5)

LI Final Competencies Check Sheet (ES-301 -6)

Final Written Exam Sample Plan (ES-401 -11213)

RFinal Record of Rejected KAs (ES-401 -4)

Li Final Written Exam Quality Check Sheet (ES-401 -6)

LYFinal Written Exam Review Work Sheet (ES-401 -9)

LI Written Exam Grading Quality Check Sheet (ES-403-1)

Location of Electronic Files:

Submitted By: _RlBaldwin Verified By:

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-l Facility: 2009-302 St. Lucie Date of Examination: 01/11/2010 acilitlit NRC Examinations Developed by:

Writte I Operating Test Wntten / Operating Test Chief T arget Task Description (Reference) Examiners ae Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) RSB

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C. 1 .d; C.2.e) RSB

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) RSB

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) RSB

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] RSB

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES 301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as RSB applicable (C.1.e andf; C.3.d)

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility RSB licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-45 } 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, RSB ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C. 1 .1; C.2.g; ES-202) RSB

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202) RSB

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review RSB (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) RSB

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor RSB (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent RSB (C.2.i;_Attachment 4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee RSB (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to RSB NRC examiners (C.3 .i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

FINAL ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: St. Lucie Date of Examination: Oct. 19, 2009 Initials Item Task Description 1 a. Veri that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

R b Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section Dl of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. ,,4F/ 1h T

7-T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. .4 1..

d Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate b

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients. / 4 M b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative

/

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. v1 ).

3 a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form 1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form f, -L (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified f (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

/ AL-

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered -

in the appropriate exam sections.

E b Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. p R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ,4/ A.

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RD or SRO). .Ai,t

,p,,,,Printe Name nature ,ate a Author b Facility Reviewer(*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#) c1A) ,4. 1,1,7/47 d NRC Supervisor 44 f. 1f,/fS/

Note. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

/

F I NA L

F*

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: St. Lucie Date of Examination: Oct. 19, 2009 1*

Initials Item Task Description 1 a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

R b Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D 1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. ,4,/ ,/,)

T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 4 12-d Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KJA statements are appropriate.

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients.

/

M b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative

/

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 4) 3 a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form 1 (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the torn, T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form / IL (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified F n.L.

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

/ AL.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered -

in the appropriate exam sections. -

E b Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55,45 sampling is appropriate. , %4f

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. y44 pI R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ,4/ IC.. ,i4 A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. 7

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

4 Printe Nam nature 1 a te a Author ,

b Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRCChiefExaminer(#) RIL41.4D S //

3 1 /c) d NRC Supervisor r Ai, rik ,_1J F Note. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines LQTTJ 44 - iL IL) i1? - JL4fy.J rz Jia, / ( 2.

FINS ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES.201-2 Facility: Sf L(.e Date of Examination:

Iu Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1 4; o,.j

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

6- 2-I-T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

E .

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. , 2

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using L

A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated fl.

T from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative -

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form

/ (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form :

T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form -?

(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix L2 of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered t.

in the appropriate exam sections.

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. j R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 1 A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RD or SRO) .i-jeSignature p,pte, a Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*) .:J j lj?t Sc I r

c. NRC Chief Examiner

d. NRC Supervisor

/

LWLw.

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination i 1 7/b I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of i/H . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. 4Fed n J L-c!cj M2 I %/.

2. sJZ. -

t cr7 -cr Ew\ i/9/io

3. 4, j.eo v,47I 1 Jf2S)j

4. flu jtJ9

5. C2A2

//g

6. /. (,)ijZ_ RW ---

i.-, r ,//(/oi

7. L) i ci- /

/ ( I)- 7

-?

t K

9. ;j/, Ii /rO

10. Ill TtI 0 11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination

..J. ci/i4a acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of / . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. /i1#w,, &si c-

2. --- i \-

IsO SiO tbv ff09 / //

4. ) / e uJ ----4--. -,

r r//

5. fce\ V\c \JcLc\tiA-cC FL& i4 kI?L i)2(#jt °

6. 1 4 1ik bech p 2

L

7. issa- (uni ,4d,k..iJt 9//1 v - / 1i0 P

4 ItP. 924JL . ) Ib/4I 10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

S ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination 1

i/

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of /,O as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee, will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowlejig9, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of //,O . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. .

2. L k /e/i/flI 2 WCk J/Li /41i&T

3. -r: (4ve5n ru-- /-rech(

4. Pht, Zvc,x!

5(4L44.X GA4c4at :Z47. .

6. ke \_\ - -

I

7. VALT \V\ ji 1/131 1/is/to

8. ,A//cFr/34),9k SI-h7) fi /1 44 -- /k-Thzi-z; J 1 772,q iJ

,-J C M/ - -,. -,.

/113)10

9. - -

4/ /

22? 7/ - -

L/c / /4./

12. zck i,t t( /-2/

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowlede, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of /i io From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNA]JJR (2) DATE NOTE 11 X r/// J/

2. flczetJ ,?J/(

3. P44.-L ,LAC J4 Jc9 2hz?

4. /)7A.JSQ6c1P iir -O- -ig,..

- ,eI

.r?J I/c

6. 26 P-4 g / ./ S7L V

/ / 2C ,

7. T - Lc.o ___________

8. LYOé fMci flca ilIYlec . j) .1

- L.c7r 7 7JfL/ cZj (3(1,1 tLALA- L n

1 Q 23 q/i3

11. j -c-57 iZO/ UA1i 74T _->-2 i7zi J2z1,D

12. VA.J 1 h.A Sic / A-4 -

?/7o7 2.Az2 Jio

13. 3o

14. AIC yIZcj /fr;l( - /?T fr*XO I &1Th.-

.T / fA-c-( A-Df 7/3o/ __j?

NOTES:

L-r b . /

-v L-- ii- *4 FQ ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-2014

1. Pre-Examination 9 . o /n/ki I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to tnstn.ict, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable it the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, 1 am aware of the physical security measures arid requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facirity licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did riot divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of )i From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 12 ,#/V /(/// ,i44- ex/i 4t&;

2.ChpWe flcqrS jk

3. CAy OP41.4Y AC AE

*FF

6. < , -

A-o W - /

7, Ldi

8. CLt Fir,-F Co --

tr !L?!

9. S--* 7/f 5/1_ -

M-- L,1Q ii..Th L,)ET - 5IZf)/ VAL4 &A13

_4, 1-4 J1o

12. u.

4 (C.J 1 - .s.)zo / y4c.f44iOC

13. / k4Ls4.r ----

14. 5/ed 15.93GL clL.)oo!? se I fAL-1 d4dr-tt. 7130/n?

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-2014

1. Pre-Examination +

I acknowledge that [have acquired specalized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date t

of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. [understand that 1 am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensIng examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the indMduat does not select the training content or provide d&ect or indirect feedback). Furthermore I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in canoellationof the examinatior.s andfor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC thief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my kriowledg, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1 ito From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SlGNAJR (2) DATE NOTE i A/f -t/4 vi 44 2.ja,1es flci6 j,tC r w/

3. fk OrWiM4Wc. .L st

4. L.4c ? IJA IZr 1 -7 5 /J 4kck,

6. J$7 1/2 /c

. i 7-(-c i

8. CLD4es fcd -

scr .

i.-L_.

i?

II. S/ VAA

12. rV5M rR.o 1 yx4ro -

,.p rg.o /

Ld iz 4i;f_

J7

15.OGrL £oo / I4L..I 2ADtJ- 13Ofo NOTES:

c s-,,- FP.

tL e ES.2O1, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-2013

1. Pro-ExaminatIon

+e .t/!7/i()

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of_________ as of the

_ date of my signature. I agree that I wIl not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons wio have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instnjct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback) Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in canceflation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I wit immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.. Post-Examination To the best of my knowtede, did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of !/t 1It) From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations

, except as spectfically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY

SlGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNA,3JRF (2) DATE NOTE 11 AL/f /f// 7 y1 eZ1, VIo/ A/4

2. cJWt flt-xfrJ itA4( ,/

3. ç f/AVID,

4. )1AJ Dp1 -:d1I.M/

5. DII

6. 1fé-PA A-- C 0

7. 1 -

8. çL,pe fArce ,-o flc. ,IIvI.

9. ,1e.-4.-

1o.rLl.( &cA ALA--

11.r4z4J 4)E LoCr s.a

-

if, il /j3 RD/-4cr3c

12. AvJu so / VAK4ro6

13. thi sZ Lf4L2.L, -

/ We 14.

NOTES:

j_ I A.L.I .41 wiiioh,

- 1 A 14k r i 4 L- jq -\-) Fc.

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-2013

1. Pre-Examination oi/JJo acknowledge that have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC ilcensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of__________ of the date of my signature. I agree that I Will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been .authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the indMdual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, 1 am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowleFfg, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of / I From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. Fx --q 7 4-c

2. ..O X-tS s .CA.k .

\_s(Dj

3. fl,.s 0 1

41

g. sRo/ Yo --2 ,

4. / )Ot 1J.

5. f:_ Jd,c \JcJC4zC

6. la

7. AIra- Citfl3& </

OtJ1.1

8. b1p -rL friS/i 9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 27 of 28 á

ES-301 I Lministrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: St. Lucie Plant Date of Examination: 01/05 /10 Examination Level: RO SRO Operating Test Number: HLC-19A NRC Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code*

M, R Conduct of Operations Determine Shutdown Margin Unit 2 Determine Time to Boil on Loss of Shutdown Cooling Conduct of Operations N, R (RO Part I only) Part 1: Obtain a Flux Log from the N DCS and delete Incore(s) Detector(s) from the DCS.

Equipment Control (SRO Part 1 and part 2) Part 2: Determine from deleted Incores, applicable FSAR operability M, R Evaluate Survey Map Data Radiation Control Respond to Security Event Emergency Procedures/Plan N, R (SRO)

NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odifled from bank ( 1)

(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)

FINAL

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 ADMINISTRATIVE JPM

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION CONDUCT OF OPERATION Al - (RO!SRO) Determine Shutdown Margin, Unit 2 F I NAL Unit 2 was at 100% power for 120 days, 3143 EFPH. An automatic reactor! turbine trip just occurred. CEA 8 did not drop and is at 132 withdrawn. Current RCS temperature is 532°F, RCS Cb is 962 ppm, and current time is 0500. You are directed to verify shutdown margin for the current plant conditions.

CONDUCT OF OPERATION A2 - (RO/SRO) Determine time to boil on loss of Shutdown cooling Unit 1 is in a Refueling outage preparing to lift the Reactor Vessel head. RCS level is 35 feet. A loss of Shutdown Cooling occurs. Determine the time to boil and the flow to makeup for Boil-Off.

Given:

RCS temperature is 95°F

The Unit was tripped on Oct. 18, at 0000

Loss of Shutdown Cooling occurred at: Oct 23, 0100 The Applicant will be using 1-0440030, Shutdown Cooling Off-Normal Tables 2, 3, 4, Figure 1 and Data Sheet 1 to determine the above.

EQUIPMENT CONTROL A3-(RO!SRO)

(RO) Part 1 only: Obtain a Flux Log from the DCS and delete an Incore Detector form the DCS.

(SRO) Part 1 and Part 2: Determine from deleted Incores, applicable FSAR operability.

RADIATION CONTROL A4 (RO/SRO)

Using the Survey map, determine the radiological postings in each Unit 1 Charging pump room.

2

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES IPLAN A5 (SRO) Response to Security Event F I NAL Both Units are at 100% power. Unit 1, 1A Diesel Generator is running loaded for the 180 day surveillance test. Unit 2, 2C AFW pump is running for a surveillance test to satisfy post maintenance testing requirements.

At 0815, the Shift Manager receives a report from the NRC of an Airborne Threat. The estimated time to site arrival is 0855. A track of interest is verified by the NRC due to anomalous flight activity. The Shift Manager is to:

Determine appropriate plant actions to take lAW Appendix D, RESPONSE TO INFORMATIONAL AIRBORNE THREAT of ONP-72.01, Response to Security Events

Determine if the E-plan is to be implemented and if so, classify the event. (time critical action of 15 minutes from 0815)

If classified, fill out the State of Florida notification form.

NOTE: the applicant will be given the entire procedure, ONP-72.01, Response to Security Events and Classification of Emergency procedures. They will be required to determine what appendix to implement, what actions to take and what classification to declare. They will also be required to fill out the State of Florida Notification form. The time critical portion of this JPM is to classify within 15 minutes of the 0815 time.

3

ANAL ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: St. Lucie Plant Date of Examination: 01/11/2010 Exam Level: RD SRO-l SRO-U Operating Test No.: HLC-19A NRC Control Room Systems (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function SI Alternate Charging flowpath to RCS through A HPSI header, Unit 2 (0821115) S A M L 2 S2 Manually actuate AFAS, Unit 2 (modified from 0821077) 5, A, M, L 4s S3 Emergency Borate Unit 2 5, A, N, L 1 S4 Cool the Quench Tank, Unit 2 5, N 5 S5 Place the Pressurizer on Recirc. Unit 2 5, A, N 3 S6 Respond to Control Room OAI radiation alarms, Unit 2 S, A, N 7 S7 Energize 2A3 4.16KV bus from Unit 1 SBO cross tie breaker S, D, L 6 (08211 29T)

C8 (RD Only) Respond to CCW Excessive Activity - Unit 1 (0821030) C, D 8 C9 (RD Only) Vent Reactor Vessel Head Using RCGVS - UNIT 1 C, D 4 (0821213)

In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRD-U)

P1 Align 1 C Intake Cooling Water Pump to the A header (0821 093) D 4s P2 Align emergency cooling water to the 1A Instrument air compressor D, E 8 (0821 068)

P3 Blend to the VCT using local control Unit 1 R, M 2

@ All RD and SRD-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RD I SRO-l / SRD-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 9I 8/ 4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 / 1 I 1 (EN)gineered safety feature - / - / 1 (control room system)

(L)ow-Power I Shutdown 1 / 1 / 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 2/ 2/ 1 (P)revious 2 exams 3/ 3 / 2 (randomly selected)

(R)CA (S)imulator

IA ES3Q1 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 JPM

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION Si: Alternate Charging flowpath to RCS through A HPSI header F I NAL Unit 2 is in 2-EOP-i5, Functional Recovery. Normal Charging flowpath is NOT available due to a Charging header break between V2429 and V2523. Appendix T, Alternate Charging Flow Path to the RCS Through the A HPSI Header is required to be implemented in attempt to maintain Pressurizer Level 30 to 68% while the HPSI Pumps are throttled. The 2B Charging pump is out of service at turnover. When the applicant starts the 2A Charging pump, it trips 5 seconds later. The only available Charging pump is the 2C. The applicant should refer back to the procedure and use the 2C Charging pump to complete the lineup.

S2: Manually actuate AFAS, Unit 2 Unit 2 has experienced a SGTR on the 2B SG. The 2B SC has been isolated and AFW flow to the 2A SG has isolated on an AFAS lockout due to zP between the 2A and 2B SG. AFAS-1 will be manually initiated. Upon manual initiation, MV-09-i 1 and MV-09-9 fail to open. When the applicant opens either valve it will trip 1 second later. (NOTE: both valves have this failure in but when either valve is placed to open it will clear the fault on the other valve, allowing the 2A OR the 2C AFW pump to feed the 2A SG).

S3: Emergency Borate Unit 2 Post trip actions are being performed with excessive cool down occurring. When Emergency boration is initiated. V2514 will not open. When the gravity feed valves are attempted to be open they also will not open. V2504, Refueling Water to the Charging pumps, among other manipulations will be required to successfully Emergency Borate.

S4: Cool the Quench Tank, Unit 2 Due to a weeping PORV V1474, the Quench tank is to be cooled lAW 2-NOP-Ol .07 Section 4.4 Lowering QT temperature by Feed and Bleed.

S5: Place the Pressurizer on Recirc. Unit 2 With the Unit at 100% power, direction is given to place the Pressurizer on recirc. As the heaters are energized and pressure setpoint lowered, the sprays valves will start to open. A malfunction in the controller will result in the PCV1100E going full open. Taking the controller to manual and lowering the output will not close the open valve, eventually requiring a manual trip prior to the TMLP trip setpoint. The reactor will fail to automatically trip if no action is taken. The 2B2 Reactor coolant pump must be stopped or the Unit will depressurize to SlAS setpoint.

S6: Respond to Control Room OAI radiation alarms, Unit 2 Unit 1 is experiencing a LBLOCA with a breach in Containment integrity. As a result of this release, Unit 2 Control Room has gone on ventilation recirc due to high radiation in the outside air intakes. Compliance with the procedure requires verification of ventilation lineup lAW 2-ONP-25.02, Ventilation Systems, Appendix B. As Appendix B is being followed, numerous damper failures should be noted and corrective actions should be taken.

2

ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 JPM

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION S7: Energize A3 4.16KV bus from Unit 1 SBO cross tie breaker F I N AL Unit 2 is in a station blackout and Unit 1 has both emergency buses being supplied by their Diesel Generators. Direction is given to cross tie the lAB and 2AB 4.16KV Bus lAW 1-EOP-99, Appendix V, Receiving AC Power from Unit 1 using the SBO Crosstie This JPM is time critical.

C8: (RO Only) Respond to CCW Excessive Activity Unit 1-CCW surge tank level is increasing causing Annunciator S-6 to alarm. Local indication reveals high level in the surge tank. The Unit supervisor had directed the actions of ONOP 1-0310030, COW Off Normal Operation to determined the cause of the high surge tank level. The Pressurizer steam space sample heat exchanger (10) will be leaking. Isolation of the heat exchanger will stop the leak.

C9: (RO Only) Vent Reactor Vessel Head Using RCGVS - UNIT 1 A LOCA has occurred on Unit 1, forming a non-condensable bubble in the reactor vessel head.

Direction has been given to vent the reactor vessel head to the Quench Tank lAW ONP 1-0120037, beginning with step 7.3.14.

P1: Align 10 Intake Cooling Water Pump to the A header The 1A Intake Cooling Water pump is to taken out of service for maintenance. The 10 Intake Cooling Water pump is to be aligned to take it place lAW 1-NOP-21.03C, section 4.1. The electrical lineup required to support taking the 1A out of service has already been performed.

P2: Align emergency cooling water to the IA Instrument air compressor A LOOP has occurred on Unit 1. Direction is given to align the Emergency Cooling System to the 1A Instrument Air Compressor and start the Compressor lAW 1-EOP-99, Appendix H Operation of the lAand lB Instrument Air Compressors.

P3: Blend to the VCT using local control Unit 1 A blend to the VCT is required on Unit 1. FCV-2161 is unable to be opened. As a result, Appendix A of 1-ONP-02.01, Boron Concentration Control is to be implemented to locally control addition of Boric acid and Primary water to blend to the VCT.

NOTE: A similar JPM to the above was performed during the 2008 NRC exam, but it was performed on the other unit, some different valve numbers, and entirely different valve locations.

As a result this JPM is considered Modified.

3

ANAL ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: 4 awt+ Date of Examination: (u l2id Operating Test Number: I Initials

1. General Criteria a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). 4_z_

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered L .

during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1 .a.) t-fr

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. -..

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent -p applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions

initiating cues

references and tools, including associated procedures

reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance j) criteria (e.g. item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria -- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. .)

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ANAL ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam:1/1 1/2010 Scenario Numbers: 2/5/8/1 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out *., ç4 of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 2 AJ\

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. _

AJ(

3. Each event description consists of

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 1 j (

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario /j jS-without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. 2

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. 12,,

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain 4 complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. V

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

/j?

r

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. 1, S(

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated ) /7 to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. 4, 1 All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301,

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 j3, j (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events 7/7 specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. 7 ./ M) i Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Total malfunctions (58) 6/ 8 / 7 / 8 s /7

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 2/4 / 2 / 3 1) /1/7

3. Abnormal events (24) 3/ 4 / 5 / 4 7, )3z

4. Major transients (12) 1/2 / 2 / 1 , /77

5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 1/2 / 1 / 1 I/C

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (02) 0/ 0 / 1 I 0 3, /77

7. Critical tasks (23) 3/ 2 / 2 / 2 j, ó/

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) T M 8 (2-3%)

P E o I L N CREW CREW CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION POTION A I

C S A B S A B S A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)

N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R lU T

E RX 1 1 1 3 110 SRO1 NOR 1 1111 I/C 2,4 2,3 3,6 6 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 3,5 2,4 4 022 RX 1 1 2 110 SRO2 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 2,7 2,3,5 4,5,9,10 6 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 2,4,5 3 0 2 2 RX 1 1 110 RO1 NOR 1,51 3111 I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 022 Instructions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

FINAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) 8 (2-3%) T M P E I L N CREW CREW CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION POTION A I

C SAB S A B S A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)

M v 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R IU T P E

RX 1 1 1 3 110 SRO3 N OR 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 2,4 2,3 3,6 6 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 2 21 TS 3,5 2,4 4 0 2 2 RX 1 1 2 110 SRO4 NOR 1 1 2 1 11 I/C 2,7 2,3,5 4,5,9,10 6 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 2 21 TS 2,4,5 3 0 22 RX 1 1 110 R02 NOR 1,51 3111 I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 022 Instructions:

i Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2,a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

FINAL

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS SRO1 X SRO2 X ROl X Competencies SCENARIO SCENAR!P_

(us) 2 (RO) 5 S(US) (RO) 2 (US) 5 (BOP) 8 (BOP) 2 (BOP) 5 S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 3,4, 2,3, 2,3, 4,5,6, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4, Events 6,7, 4 5,6, 6,7 4,5, 7,9,10 8 6,7, and Conditions 8 8 6 8 Comply With and 1,2, 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3, Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 6,10 6 3,5, 10 6,7 6,9 6,9 Operate Control 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, Boards (2) 3,6 3,7 6,7,9, 8,9 8,9 4,6, 10 7,8 Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, and Interact 3,6 4,5, 3,6, 5,6,7, 8 8,9 4,7, 6,7 7 9,10 8 Demonstrate 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 4,5, 3,6, 8,9 6,7 7,9 Comply With and 3,5 2,4 2,4, Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5 Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ANAL

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS SRO3 X SRO4 X R02 X Competencies SCENARIO SNARIO SCENARIO (us) 2 S(RO) (US) 8 (RO) 2 (US) 5 S(BOP) (BOP) 2 (BOP) 5 S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 3,4, 2,3, 2,3, 4,5,6, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4, Events 6,7, 4 5,6, 6,7 4,5, 7,9,10 8 6,7, and Conditions 8 8 6 8 Comply With and 1,2, 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3, Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 6,10 6 3,5, 10 6,7 6,9 6,9 Operate Control 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, Boards (2) 3,6 3,7 6,7,9, 8,9 8,9 4,6, 10 7,8 Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, and Interact 3,6 4,5, 3,6, 5,6,7, 8 8,9 4,7, 6,7 7 9,10 8 Demonstrate 1,2, 1,3, 1,2, Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 4,5, 3,6, 8,9 6,7 7,9 Comply With and 3,5 2,4 2,4, Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5 Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U, (3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ANAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios P V BU(1) T M P E o I L N CREW POSITION N T

I T S A B A C R T 0 L u A T 0 C P M(*)

Ro-I NOR MAJ 6 1 221 TS 3,4 2 022 RX 1 1 110 SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 X I/C 3,5 2 442 MAJ 6 1 2 21 TS 022 NOR 1 I/C 2,4,7,8,9 5 4 4 2 MAJ 6 1 221 TS 022 Instructions:

j Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS SRO-I X SRO-I X RO X Competencies SCENARIO SCENAR!2 SCENARIP BU BU BU Interpret/Diagnose 3,5,6,7,8,9 3,5,6,7 2,4,7,8 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1,3,6,8,9 1,3,5,6 1,2,6 Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control N/A 1,3,5,6 1,2,4,8 Boards (2)

Communicate 1,6,8,9 1,3,5,6 1,2,4,6, and Interact 8 Demonstrate 1,3,6,8,9 N/A N/A Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and 3,4 N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

FiNAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 with Alternate Lineup A E Scenarios P V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) 8 (2-3%) T M P E I L N CREW CREW CREW POSITION N T

I T POSITION POSITION A I

C SABSA B S A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)

N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R lU T

E SRO1 RX 1 1 2 110 X NOR 1 1 2111 I/C 2,4 2,3 4,5,9,10 5 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 3,5 2 022 RX 1 1 1 3 110 SRO2 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 X I/C 2,7 2,3,5 3,6 7 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 2,4,5 2,4 5 0 2 2 1___

NOR 1__

I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

7 1 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; fri TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

FINAL

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

[facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 with Alternate Lineup A E Scenarios P V 2 (100%) 5 (30%) 8 (2-3%) T M P E I L N CREW CREW CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION POTION A C S A B S A B S A B L u A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)

M v 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R lU T P E

SRO3 NOR 1 1 I/C 2,4 2,3 4,5,9,10 5 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 2 2 1 TS 3,5 2 022 RX 1 1 1 3 110 SRO4 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 X I/C 2,7 2,3,5 3,6 7 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 2,4,5 2,4 5 0 2 2 R02 NOR 1__

I/C 4,8 5,7,8,9 3,4,6,8 10 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 221 TS 022 Instructions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC

, position.

.Z6 Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Corn petencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 w/AIt. Lineup APPLICANTS SRO1 X 5R02 X RO X Competencies S9NARIO (us) 2 (RO) 5 (US) 8 (RO) 2 (US) 5 S(80P) (BOP) 2 (BOP) 5 S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 4,5,6, 2,3, 2,3, 3,4,5, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4, Events 6,7, 4 7,9,10 6,7 4,5, 6,8 8 6,7, and Conditions 8 6 8 Comply Withand 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3, Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 10 6 3,5, 10 6,7 6,9 6,9 Operate Control 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, Boards (2) 3,6 6,7,9, 3,7 8,9 8,9 4,6, 10 7,8 Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3,4, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, and Interact 3,6 5,6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7 8 8,9 4,7, 9,10 7 8 Demonstrate 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,4, Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7 8,9 7,9 Comply With and 3,5 2,4, 2,4 Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5 Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

F i N AL

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Date of Examination: 1/11/2010 Operating Test No.: 1 w!Alt. Lineup APPLICANTS SRO3 X 5R04 X R02 X Competencies SCENARIO us) 2 (RO) 5 S(US) (RO) 2 (US) 5 S(BOP) (BOP) 2 (BOP) 5 S(RO)

Interpret/Diagnose 2,5, 2,3, 4,5,6, 2,3, 2,3, 3,4,5, 4,6,8 5,6,7, 3,4, Events 6,7, 4 7,9,10 6,7 4,5, 6,8 8 6,7, and Conditions 8 6 8 Comply With and 1,2, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,6, 1,5,9 1,6,9 1,3, Use Procedures (1) 3,5, 3,6 10 6 3,5, 10 6,7 6,9 6,9 Operate Control 1,2, 1,4,5, 1,2, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, Boards (2) 3,6 6,7,9, 3,7 8,9 8,9 4,6, 10 7,8 Communicate 1-8 1,2, 1,3,4, 1,2, 1-6 1,3,4, 1,4,6, 1,5,7, 1,3, and Interact 3,6 5,6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7 8 8,9 4,7, 9,10 7 8 Demonstrate 1,2, 1,2, 1,3,4, Supervisory Ability (3) 6,7, 3,6, 5,6,7 8,9 7,9 Comply With and 3,5 2,4, 2,4 Use Tech. Specs. (3) 5 Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RD.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

F9NAL

AFT, ES-401, Rev. 9 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Facility:

--CIQ Date of Exam: 2ó?, .2o7 )

RO K/A Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K KKI< KKAAIAAG A2 G* Total 1

2 3

=

4 5

=

6 1

=

213

= =T 4

Total i 3 18 3 3 6 Emergency &

Abnormal Plant Evolutions 2

TierTotals T

NIA 11 4j N/A 5

2 9 27 2

5 2

5 4

10 1 3 2 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 28 3 2 5 2.

Plant Systems 2

Tier Totals 4 1

3 1 1 4

11 4 2 1

2 0

2 4

11 4

1 4

5 1 10 38 1)1 4

/

3 3

8

= = = = = C = C

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Categories 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-oniy outlines (i.e., except for one category in TIer 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each KIA category shalt not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier In the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.

The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added, Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution,

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an Importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.

7 generic (G) K/As in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (iRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category.

Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G on the SRO-only exam, enter It on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note

1 does not apply). Use dupiicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals(S) on Form ES-401 -3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55,43.

ES-401, Rev. 9 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 FaciIity:. Date of Exam: 2có .2cc 7 )

RO K/A Category Points SRO-OnIy Points Tier Group 1

[

KKKKKKAAAAG 1234561 234

Total A2 I G* Total

= = = = = = = =

3 3 3 3 3 3 18 3 3 6 Emergency &

Abnormal Plant 2

T 2

N/A 1 1 N/A 2 9 2 2 4 Evolutions Tier Totals 5 27 5 5 10

= = = = = = = = =

1 323 311 23334 28 3 2 5 pi2a,it *2 11111101111 10 hi 1 3 Systems Tier Totals 4 3 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 38 4 3 8

- = = = = = = = = =

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Categories -

3 2 2 3 2 2 1 2

1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-oniy outlines (i.e., except for one category In Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each KIA category shall not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.

The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KIA statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6. Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.

7. *The generic (G) KIAs in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note

1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

9. For Tier 3, select topics from SectIon 2 of the KIA catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.

ES-401, REV 9 T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO Sf0 007EG2.1,19 Reactor Trip Stabilization Recovery 39 3.8

/ 1

- 11 H

- 1 L H J Ability to use plant computer to evaluate system or component status.

OO8AA1 08 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident 13 38 38 .i r L L _ 1 1 C U PRT level pressure and temperature O11EK3.14 LargeBreakLoCA/3 4.1 4.2 H [l H Li Li U H L1 H RCPfrippingrequirement 015AK2.08 RCP Malfunctions /4 2.6 2.6 H i H H Li H H LI Li Li LI CCWS 022AA1.08 Loss of Rx Coolant Makeup /2 3.4 3.3 I [ ci Li ii Li Li El VCT level 025AK1 01 Loss 01 RHR System / 4 39 4 3 r L H LI Li [_l E Loss of RHRS during alt modes of operation 026AK3.02 Loss of Component Cooling Water /8 3.6 3.9 [] 1 Li H H ci El LI El H EL The automatic actions (alignments) within the CCWS

-- resulting from the actuation of the ESFAS 027AK1 .01 Pressurizer Pressure Control System 3.1 3.4 Malfunction / 3 H 1 ci Li H H 1 LI Definition of saturation temperature 038EG2 4.18 Steam Gen. Tube Rupture / 3 3.3 4.0 j - H Li El [I H HZ Knowledge of the specific bases for EOPs 055EA1 .06 Station flackout / 6 4.1 45 [ Li Li LI El Li LI Restoration of power with one ED/G 056AK lOt Loss of 0ff-site Power / 6 3.7 4.2 H Li Li Li Li Li H H I Principle of cooling by natural convection Page 1 of 2 3/25/2009 11.17 AM

ES-401, REV 9 T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 KS K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPiC:

RO Sf0 057AA2.Ol Loss of Vital AC Inst. 8us)6 3.7 3.8 Li Li LI Li H H El i Li Li H Safety injection tank pressure and level indicators 058AK3.Ol LossofoCPower/6 3.4 3.7 H LI i Li H LI Li Li H H LI Use of dc control power by DIGs 062AG2.l.7 Loss of Nuclear Svc Water/4 4.4 4.7 1 LI LI Li LI Li H LI Li Li Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior and instrument interpretation.

065AA2.08 Loss of Instrument Air/S 2.9 3.3 LI H El LI C H Li lI H Li [1 Failure modes of air-operated equtpment 077AA2.lO Generator Voltage and Electric Grid 3.6 Disturbances I 6 3.8 II H Li H H H F J LI IJ Generator overheating and required actions CEO5EK2.1 Steam Line Rupture Excessive Heat Transfer / 4

- 3.3 3.6 r ii H LI H H H LI ri LI JJ Components, and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and aulomatic and manual features.

CE06EK2. 1 Loss of Main Feedwater / 4 3,3 3.7 H Li Li LI El H Li I [ Components, and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features.

Page 2 of 2 312512009 11:17AM

ES-401, REV 9 T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR 1(1 K2 K3 1(4 1(5 1(6 Al A2 A3 A4 (3 TOPIC:

flO SRO 003AG2.1.28 Dropped Control Rod / 1 4,1 4.1 Li LI Li [I Ji LI H Li Li H; Knowledge of the purpose and function of major system components and controls.

028AK1 .01 Pressurizer Level Malfunction /2 2.8 3.1 ii.. Li [1 Li El H Li H [1 LI U PZR reference leak abnormalities 032AK1 .01 Loss of Source Range NI / 7 2.5 3.1 j LI Li 1 H I U LI [J U Etlecls of voltage changes on performance 036AA1.02 Fuel Handling Accident/8 3.1 Li H H [ I .i Li Li Li ARM system 037AK3.07 Steam Generator Tube Leak /3 4.2 4.4 H H i H I U LI LI El Li Li Actions contained in EOP for S/G tube leak 051 AG2 4 3 Loss of Condenser Vacuum I 4 37 39 Li H I I U Ii Li LI Li ] Abilily to identity post accident instwmentation 060AA2.02 Accidental Gaseous Radwaste Ret. / 9 3.1 4 ii Li _J LI -.

Li El LI The possible location of a radioactive-gas leak with the assistance of PEO. health physics and chemistry personnel 061AK201 ARM System Alarms /7 2.5 2.6 1 I Li H El Li Li Li Li Detectors at each ARM system location CEO9EK3.3 Functional Recovery / None 3.7 3.9 i I Li :

H ) LI LI LI LI [L Manipulation of controls required to obtain desired operating results during abnormal, and emergency situations.

Page 1 of 1 3/25/2009 11:17AM

ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-40I-2 KA NAME! SAFETY FUNCTION: IR 1(1 K2 1(3 K4 K5 1(6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO 003K1.02 Reactor Coolant Pump 2.6 2.8 1 Li Li Li Li Li Li Li LI Li Li RCP motor cooling and ventilation 003K6.02 Reactor Coolant Pump 2.7 3.1 Li ii Li Li Li II Li Li Li LI L] RCP seals and seal water supply -

004A4.05 Chemical and Volume Control 3.6 3.1 Li Li FL Li H Li Li LI Letdown pressure and temperature control valves.

004G2.4.30 Chemical and Volume Control 2.7 4.1 LI Li Li LI Li Li LI fl L] LI [,

1 Knowledge of events related to system operations/status that must be reported to internal orginizations or outside agencies.

005A 1.07 Residual Heal Removal 2.5 3.1 LI LI Li El LI Li I Li L Li LI Determination of test acceptability by comparison ot recorded valve response times with Tech-Spec requirements 0061(2.04 Emergency Core Cooling 3.6 3.8 LI Fi Li [I El El Li H ii Li Li ESFAS-operated valves 007A4.09 Pressurizer Rehef/Quench Tank 25 2.7 LI LI LI Li Li -_ LI LI I1 LI Relationships between PZR level and changing levels of

. the PRT and bleed holdup lank 008A4. 10 Component Cooling Water 3 1 3.1 El LI El LI Li Li LI F 1 Li l1 I I Conditions that require the operation ot two CCW coolers 008K4.01 Component Cooling Water 3.1 3.3 LI Li Li 1 Li Li Li Li LI El [ I Automatic start of standby pump O1OK1 08 Pressurizer Pressure Control 32 35 / El Li H El F I I I J PZR LCS 010K3 02 Pressurizer Pressure Control 40 4 1 Li LI I

[] [1 I Li RPS Page lot 3 3/25/2009 11:17AM

ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO 012A3.03 Reactor Protection 3.4 [1 Li Li LI Li Li Li Li F 1 fl Power supply 013A2 03 Engineered Safety Features Actuation 44 LI Li C I I1 L F I Rapid depressurization 0130?.2.42 Engineered Safety Features Actuation 3.9 4.6 [1 Li Li Li H LI ii [1 [1 Li Ability to recognize system parameters that are entry-level conditions for Technical Specifications 022A2 05 Containment Cooling 3 1 i C L .i i r 1 Li [ ] Mator teak in CCS 026A1 01 Containment Spray 39 I 4 2 H Li I i Containment pressure 039G2.4.2 Main and Reheat Steam 4.5 4.6 Li Li Li Li Li Li ri C Li J Knowledge of system set points, interlocks and automatic actions associated with EOP entry conditions.

059A2.04 Main Feedwater 2.9 3.4 1 Li Li LI Li L. I I bil Li 1 1 J Feeding a dry S/G 059A3.03 Main Feedwater 2.5 26 7 Li Li Li C C Li Li Li Feedwater pump suction flow pressure 061K5 01 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 36 39 Li C Li 1 L 1 Li [1 1 Relationship between AFW flow and RCS heat transfer 062G2.4.4 AC Electrical Distribution 4.5 4.7 Li - H Li [I Li F 1 l Ability to recognize abnormal indications for system

- operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for emergency and abnormal operating procedures.

063K2 01 DC Electrical Distribution 29 3 1 I r 1 1 .j L Malor DC loads Page 2 ot 3 3/25/2009 1117 AM

ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTUNE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 1(6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO 0641(1.02 Emergency Diesel Generator 3.1 36 E] E Li Li LI Li Li LI LI Li Li DIG cooling water system 0731(301 Process Radiation Monitoring 36 42 Li Z Li L LI [I C IC fl Radioactive effluent releases 0761(4 06 Service Water 28 32 ] Li i i LI [ I 1 Ci Li I 1 Service water train separation 078A3 01 Instrument Air 3 1 32 r L I [ J I1 Air pressure 0781(4 02 Instrument Air 32 3 LI I I LI Li Cross over to other air systems 1 03K3 02 Containment 38 42 i Li LI LI Li C [1 Li Loss of containment integrity under normal operations Page3of3 3125/2009 1117AM

ES-401, REV 9 T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR 1(1 K2 K3 K4 1(5 1(6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO 0011(3.02 Control Rod Drive 3.4 3.5 Li H LI Li H ii Ii H LI Li F1CS 0021(4 09 Reactor Coolant 32 32 Li LI Li L LI L H H Li Operation ot loop isolation valves 0161(1 06 Non-nuclear Instrumentation 3.6 Li Li Li H L H LI Li ri LI AFW system 0171(601 In core Temperature Monitor 27 30 i 1 II Li I Li LI H F1 Sensors and detectors 0271(501 Conlainment Iodine Removal 31 L LI Li H 1 I I LI Li Li Purpose of charcoal tillers 028K2 01 Hydrogen Recombiner and Purge 25 28 Control Li i Li Li i I I F Hydrogen recombiners 029A3 01 Containment Purge 38 40 fl Li H Li H Li LI Li Li IL CPS isolation 041 A2.02 Steam Dump/Turbine Bypass Control 3.6 39 Li H Li H I1 . LI Steam valve stuck open 075A4.0l Circulating Water 3.2 3.2 Li H LI IL Li I ii H II H: Emergency/essential SWS pumps 086G2.4.18 Fire Protection 33 4.0 Li L Li ri r 1 1 Li Li H Knowledge of the specific bases for EOPs.

Page loll 3/25/2009 11.17 AM

ES-401, REV 9 T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401.2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR 1(1 K2 K3 K4 KS K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO G2.l.19 Conduct of operations 3.9 3.8 11 r Li Hi I I Li Li Li Li Ability to use plant computer to evaluate system or component status.

G2,1 3-4 Conduct of operations 2.7 3.5 ri L I Li Li LI [Ii LI Knowledge of primary and secondary chemistry limits (32.1.4 Conduct of operations 3.3 3.8 I I I I I I I I Li Li LI Li Li Knowledge of individual licensed operator responsibilities related to shill staffing, such as medical requirements.

Tho-solo operation, maintenance of active license statur, IOCFR55 etc.

(32.2.35 Equipment Control 3.6 4.5 [1 Li H Li LI i IL H LI fl Ability to determine Technical Specification Mode of Operation (32.2.43 Equipment Control 30 3-3 Li LI H Li H LI Li H Li Knowledge of the process used to track inoperable alarms (32.3.13 Radiation Control 3.4 3.8 LII [1 Li H Li L El Li Li i Knowledge of radiological safety procedures pertaining to licensed operator duties (32 3 6 Rdiat,on Control 20 38 J .Z LI L Li LI H 1 1 H Li [i Ability to aprove release permits G2 4 18 Emergency Procedures/Plans 33 4 0 1 H [1 H Li LI . Li lv Knowledge of the specific bases for EOPs 02 4 3 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3 [i H I LI j II LI El [] {] Ability to identity post accident instrumentation G2 46 Emergency Procedures/Plans 37 47 Li I i Li LI [1 LI ] Knowledge symptom based EOP mitigation strategies Page loll 3/25/2009 1117AM

ES-401, REV 9 SRO T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTiON: IA Ki K2 1(3 1(4 K5 1(6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

HO SRO 007EG2.4.20 Reactor Trip Stabilization- Recovery 3.8 43

/ 1 Li Li Li El 1 El l [1 [j Knowledge of operational implications of EOP warnings, cautions and notes.

009EA2.14 Small Break LOCAI3 3.8 Li LI Li ri El Li Li [l H Li 1 Actions to be taken if PTS limits are violated 022AA2.04 Loss of R Coolant Makeup /2 2.9 3.8 [] LI Li LI LI Ll L Li LI How long PZR level can be maintained within limits 058AG2.2.4 Loss of DC Power! 6 3.6 3.6 El LI Li El Li J I j i (multi-unit) Ability to explain the variations in control board layouts, systems, instrumentation and procedural actions between units at a facility.

062AA2.05 Loss of Nuclear Svc Water! 4 2.4 2.5 LI Li ELi El I H Li Li The normal values for SWS-header flow rate and the flow rates to the components cooled by the SWS 065AG2.4.50 Loss of Instrument Air/S 4.2 4.0 Li Li [i 1 LI r I ii I I Ability to verify system alarm setpoints and operate controls identilied in the alarm response manual.

Page 1 of 1 3/25/2009 11:17 AM

ES-401, REV 9 SF10 T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES.401-2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO 033AA2.09 Loss 01 Intermediate Range NI/ 7 3.4 3.7 H [1 fl H H Li Li. I LI Conditions which allow bypass of an intermediate-range level trip swftch 067AG2 4.21 Plant Fire On-site) 98 40 4.6 1 11 H H I H Li Li H H Knowledge of the parameters and logic used to assess the status of safety functions 074EG2.2.40 mad. Core Cooling / 4 3.4 H H .i H LI Li Li LI :1 Ability to apply technical specifications for a system.

076AA2.04 High Reactor Coolant Activity / 9 2.6 3 1 H H LI LI Li LI il Li C. ij Process effluent radiation chart recorder Page 1 of 1 3/25/2009 11:17 At1

ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR 1(1 1(2 K3 1(4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO 003G2 132 Reactor Coolant Pump 3.8 4.0 Li ii I Li Li Li [ Li Li 1I Ability to explain and apply all system limits and precautions.

010A2 01 Pressurizer Pressure Control 33 36 Li Li L Li Li [j Heater failures 012G2.4.31 Reactor Protection 4.2 4.1 H Li Li H [1 Knowledge of annunciators alarms, indications or response procedures 063A2.01 DC Electrical Distribution 25 3.2 LI ii Li H [. H El [1 Grounds 076A2.01 Service Water 3.5 3.7 [1

[1 Li Li H H [1 Loss of SWS Page 1 cit 3/25/2009 1117 AM

ES-401, REV 9 SHO T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 1<4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO 027A2.01 Containment Iodine Removal 3.0 3.3 1 Li Li LI Li Li Eu i [1 Li Li High temperature in the tiller system 029G2 4 18 Containment Purge 33 40 Li E I) E u_ LI Li L LI Knowledge of the specific bases br EOPs 034K4 03 Fuel Handling Equipment 26 33 fl Li LI Cl LI i Li Overload protection Page lofi 3/25/2009 11:17AM

ES-401, REV 9 SRO T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR KI 1(2 K3 K4 1(5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:

RO SRO G2 11 Conduct of operations 3.8 4.2 Li LI Li Li LI El El Ti [1 L] Knowledge of conduct ot operations requirements.

G2. 1.9 Conduct of operations 2.9 4.5 1 LI LI LI El LI El Li LI fl [j Ability to direct personnel activities inside the Control room.

G2.2.17 Equipment Control 2.6 3.8 [ i Li El LI Li LI LI Li El LI i Knowledge of the process br managing maintenance activities during powe operations.

G2.2.43 Equipment Control 3.0 3.3 LL LI LI Li Li Li Li 12 LI Li [l Know1ed of the process used to track inoperable alarms G2 3 11 Radiation Control 38 43 L LI Li Li Li - LI LI LI j Abitity to control radiation releases G2.4.19 Emergency Procedures/Plans 34 4.1 H Li [LI Ii LI El LI [1 Li Li F Knowledge of EOP layout, symbols and icons.

G2 4.39 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.9 3.8 F]

Li LI LI Li Li Li [ H Li . Knowledge of the FlOs responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.

Page 1 of 1 3/25/2009 11:17AM

ANAL ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Randomly Selected Reason for Rejection Group K/A T2G2 002K4.09 St. Lucie doe not have loop isolation valves (Ques. 57) Replaced with 002K4,10 T1G2 033AA2.09 St. Lucie does not have intermediate range NIs (SRO)

(Ques. SRO 82) Replaced with 033AA2.07 Replace second time with 0037AA2.10 Ti G2 O32AK1 .01 Source range Nis not voltage variable (Dues. 21) Replaced with 032AA2.09 T3 G2.3.6 K/A less than 2.5 (2.0) for RD exam (Ques. 72) Replaced with G2.3.4 T2G1 007A4.09 PSL has no bleed holdup tank (Ques. 34) Replaced with 007A4.i0 T2G2 075A4.01 No relationship between Circ water and SWS pumps (Ques. 64) Replaced with 075A2.01 T1G1 057AA2.0i SI tank instrumentation is not off Instrument bus at PSL. Power is supplied from Power Panel from Motor Control Center (Ques. 12) Replaced with 057AA2.04 T2G2 029G2.4.18 Containment Purge: Knowledge of specific bases for EOPs. This K/A is very similar to 027A2.0l from T2G2 Containment Iodine Removal: High temperature in the filter system. Recommend changing 029G2.4.18 due to containment purge is used for H2 removal in the EOPs and same containment purge has iodine removal charcoal filters which would be used in EOPs. To meet both K/As, question would have to be similar.

(Ques. SRO 92) Replaced with 029G2.4.50 T3 G2.4.39 Emergency Procedures/Plans: Knowledge of the RDs responsibilities in emergency plan implementation. Cannot write question and meet Guidelines for SRD only Questions Rev. 0 (Ques. SRQ 100) Replaced with G2.4.30 T3 G2.2.43 Same KA for RD and SRO exam. Recommend change RD exam KA (Ques. 70) Replaced with G2.2.39 7/13/2009

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Randomly Selected Reason for Rejection Group KJA T1G2 051AG2.4.3 No relationship to loss of Condenser Vacuum and post-accident instrumentation.

(Ques. 24) Replaced with 051AG2.4.35 Replaced due to conflict with 007A4.1 0 Recognition of leaking TIGI OO8AAI.08 PORV/code safety (Ques. 34)

(Ques. 2) Replaced with OO8AA1 .06 T2GI 004G2.4.30 Unable to write a discriminatory question. Replaced with 004G2.4.31 (Ques. 31) 7/13/2009

FINAL ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: St. Lucie Date of Exam: 12/09 Exam Level: RD SRO Initial Item Description a b* c

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 24 f4_

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RD or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR CL program office).

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or X the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest I I new or modified); enter the actual RD / SRD-only 19 / 2 I 4/2 I 52 / 21 question distribution(s) at right. I I 25% / 8% I 5% / 8% 69% / 84%

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RD Memory C/A exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; I the SRD exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels, enter 36 / 11 II 39 / 14 the actual RD / SRO question distribution(s) at right. 48% / 44% 52% / 56%

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. A)

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

ure Date c

a. Author Larry Rich Ii

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note: The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

FINAL

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9 ST. LUCIE INITIAL DRAFT REVIEW nstructions

[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.1

1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).

Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.

One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only(KJA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

1. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1 -5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- 0= SRO U/EJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only eneric Comments:

1. The alignment of each question appears differently. What I am saying is that the distractors should be aligned to the left and below the stem of the question.

2. Make sure all stem bullets are the same, have periods at the end.

3. Change the word states to identifies in question stem.

4. Add parenthesis for all noun names of procedures as well as valve and equipment names.

5. Make a table of contents for each exams references that will be handed to the applicants, RO and SRO so this can be used for the ADAMS submittal in stead of the actual handout.

>07EG2.1.19, New, Memoryl2 F 2-3 5

)uestion appears to be Ok

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only O8AA1.06, New, CA, Unit 1 Be consistent with the use of periods in each of the items in the initial

onditions.

sk licensee if, this is an RO knowledge level question. It appears to be a 2 H 3 x asis of the procedure. If they state it is Ok, leave it, if not then needs to e changed.

)therwise it appears to be ok.

S *hursday, September 10, 2009 Licensee/Operations state Ok for RO 11EK3.14, BANK, NRC 2001 PSL Exam, CA, Unit 1 Distractors D the second part does not seem plausible, neither does Jistractor A How about changing A to read as the last part of C and 0 to read omething like answer in B. This way we will only have two thought in ach item to concentrate on and not all 4 as it is now.

A. ALL RCPs to enhance RCS heat removal.

B. All RCPs due to loss of RCP NPSH.

3 H 2-3 X C. ONE RCP in each loop to enhance RCS heat removal.

D. ONE RCP due to reduced RCP NPSH.

What do you think of this?

Fhursday, September 10, 2009 5 3eneric Reference s to be provided 1 A and 1 B. OK for the reference.

Was not originally on the question.

Discussion of the distractors from above. Accepted the recommended.

)K with changes.

)15AK2.08, NEW, C/A Vhile the stem asks in 1) what has closed the HCV-1 4-1 1 Bi. the second loes not illicit the answer in the second part of each answer that states Override and ... (distractors B and D) This needs to be clearer on what is being overridden.

he distractor speaking about High radiation Is not as valid as it could be.

4 H 2-3 x Jo reference was provided conceming the High Rad signal and how many ugh rad signals needed to cause an isolation.

Fix is to add a value that represents high rad but not high enough to rigger the isolation of HCV-14-11B1. W NOT c Ibis. SB reviewed PSL OPS 0702209R08.doc, and it does not identify what it akes to cause the isolation. Discuss with licensee.

hursday, September 10, 2009

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

2. 3._Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1 -5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only dded the valve number as above, HCV 14 11 Bi to B and D.

(alve ONLY closes on high temp NOT radiation.

22AA1 .08, Modified Bank, Unit 1 Please change in the stem the symbol, that looks like it means it is steady, unless this is a normal symbol used in all previous examinations. The ame goes for the down signal. It would be better to use words. le.,

teady, down, etc.

5 H 3 E

)therwise it appears to be Ok.

hursday, September 10, 2009 Dhanged the arrows.

)K as changed.

)25Ak1.01, Bank 2149, Unit 2?

Need some clarification with a drawing to see what is being done.

Distractors A and B are opposites of each other.

Dan distractors C and D be done to do the same? Dont believe that listractor D is plausible. Pressurizer and Hot leg? Interaction does not nake sense, no distractor analysis done, only states its incorrect. Discuss vhy D is plausible?

If C is reversed, is this also an answer? Seems so.

flhy is the procedure not identified in the stem? In accordance with (lAW)

-NOP-01 .04 Is the information in the stem ALL necessary??

6 F 2-3 Thursday, September 10, 2009

,dded procedure to the stem.

Rewrote the questions as follows:

Jhat shutdown cooling loop is in operation? Requires A train operating ind B in standby.

If loss of SDC would occur WOOTF conditions could result in RCS iressurization and loss of inventory.

Reworded EACH distractor.

ppears to be Ok as discussed.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only

)26AK3.02, New, Memory, Both Units fJhile the information provided identifies that a DBA LOCA is the basis for he CCW flow, this is really not identified in the two distractors. Is it iecessary to add that to A and C? It would seem appropriate. Ask 7 F 2-3 licensee.

rhursday, September 10, 2009 Replaced LOCA with DBA for A and C.

)K

)27AK1.01, New, CA, Unit 1

)27AK1 .01, New, CA, Unit 1, (cent.)

Fhe stem uses initially, does this have to be defined? It might help to woid comments in the end.

8 H Use the words rather than the arrows.

8 2-3 Separate the distractors A B C and D from the arrows.

Cont. H )therwise appears to be Ok.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 s Thanged What will be the FIRST effect will this failure....

ot rid of the arrows. Replaced with Rising and Lowering.

)K as changed.

)38EG2.4.18, New, Memory, Unit 2 In the stem, put the words close fuses in quotes, close fuses.

ppears to be Ok.

9 F 2 Thursday, September 10, 2009 Decided to put quotes around close instead of what was suggested above.

It will now read close fuses....

)55EA1.06, Bank 107&759, CA, Unit 1 The information for the UNIT 1 Permissive light, is immaterial for this luestion, since the Unit 1 light for each distractor is ON. This information an be removed from the stem. OR Thange distractors C and D to have Unit 1 to be OFF. That way the ipplicant has to figure out which was the permissive light has to be.

10 H 3 X

his would be a better way to do it,

) and D should read Unit 1 OFF, Unit 2 ON, - - this way it is opposite of he answer.

hursday, September 10, 2009 Thanged as requested. OK with change.

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK L0D (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only

)56AK1.01, New, CA, Unit 2 KA statement on the question states natural circulation, however, the KA atalog states natural convection.

Is this question within the knowledge requirement of an RO, in that, the u requirement to know that the safety function for both EDG5 not running is NOT being met? ASK Licensee if they believe this is Ok. If not, change.

rhe licensee identifies that opening the PORV (ADV) will enhance the iatural circulations the GREATEST, while this is stated in the answer, it is iot identified in the reference material. Licensee states this is GFES H\

2-3 X INFO

\lso, There is no justification for single or two phase flow. What indications provided in the stem would indicate that two phase flow was 11 )resent? This does not seem plausible. Need to use temp and pressure o determine subcooling, this will then determine single or two phase flow.

H If there is subcooling there is single phase flow. Applicants will have steam 2-3 X ables and figure 1A.

Fhe procedures name in distractors C and D is different than the actual rocedure. Capitalize the word EFFECT in these distractors because it is art of the procedures name. Made the procedure name in caps.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 They do expect RO to knowledge. IF you dont have DGs running, then ou dont have maintenance of vital aux..

See above in blue.

Thanges OK.

)57AA2.04, New, Memory, Unit 1

. NOT question, should be used sparingly. OK for this one.

12 F 3 5 .ppears to be Ok.

Thursday, September 10. 2009 ik jj )58AK3.01, New, Memory, Unit 1 Distractors C and D are missing the periods.

13 F 2-3 X . . .

Vhy is it expected that distractors A and B are plausible? What nformation is provided in the stem that would indicate that a SIAS or Loop ccurred? This makes these 2 distractors implausible.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only Thursday, September 10, 2009

)hanged the entire question.

uesday, July 13, 2010. 11:13 AM Replacement question.

S Replacement question appears to be Ok.

62AG2.1.7, Bank 3284, Memory Unit 2 Re write the stem to state:

Prior to reducing turbine load, WOOTF (which one of the following) will ave the GREATEST impact in maintaining available heat removal 14 F 2-3 apacity?

)therwise appears to be Ok.

S Thursday, September 10, 2009 Used recommendation.

65AA2.08, New, CA, Unit 2 dd the percent symbol (%) behind the 70 in the stem, should be 70%.

hange the question to read, If Instrument Air continues to lower, WOOTF lant responses is expected? (Assume NO Operator actions are taken) 15 H 3 his is the same as a previous question.

hursday, September 10, 2009 ccepted suggestion.

)K, change is to are.

)77AA2.10, Modified NRC Exam PSL 2008 Question 18, CA, Unit 1 In stem is 60 MVARS lag out redundant for lag only? Is this teaching?

Dan it be said that the unit can only maintain pressure at 45 psia vice aving problems?

S? rhe curve provided does not identify stator winding or rotor winding over eating, it just identifies rotor or stator heating. Is this the same? Ask Licensee?

Meets requirements for modification.

16 H 3

)therwise appears to be Ok Fhursday, September 10, 2009 Removed the word out.

S

)nly able to maintain 45 psis Hydrogen pressure.

Removed winding from each of the first parts of each distractor.

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q SRO U1E1S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only E05EK2.1, New, CA, Unit 2 dd the word the prior to 2A SIG. Add to the IC prior to the bullets, The ollowing conditions now exist. In the stem, change states to identities o make clearer.

In each distractor, separate each line out so that the two thoughts will be

,asier read. Currently the distractors are very hard to read.

\ll BUT distractor C identifies MSIS Channel A as being activated. In

) this should be the same. Change the format of the question to pull out he common part, ie MSIS Channel A has actuated and put it in the front 17 H 3 )f the question. This way you dont have to continually read this tatement.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

.dded to stem The following conditions now exist.

In distractor C it is missing Channel A. Will SEND to be reviewed.

uesday, July 13, 2010. 1113 AM s

)hanges are ok.

E05EK2.1, New, Memory, Unit 1 18 F 3 S ppears to be Ok.

19 F 3 5 Use commas and quotes as appropriate.

ppears to be Ok 20 H 3 S ppears to be Ok 21 F 2-3 ..,

ppears to be ok Do you need to add the RC-XX-XX number also, or is it enough to just 22 H 3 iave the GAG-XXX number?

dd the word IF prior to at the same time..

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U1EJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only

)therwise appears to be tine.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

)K as is. And accepted the IF above.

)37AK3.07, Bank 2259, CA, Unit 1 Distractors C and D can be disqualified immediately because they are

,t NOT less than the 930 psia maximum value listed in step 11 of EOP-04.

Thanged C and D to 840 to 890 which is 50 psig above with no below.

The stem is NOT clear, in that, the stem is not clear where in the rocedure you are trying to control RCS pressure. Information should be rovided that indicates that the plant is about to Depressurize the RCS

,nd.

23 H 3 This band should be changed so that the highest number for RCS ressure is a maximum of 930 psia. Discuss with licensee to make learer what is being asked.

Thursday, September 10. 2009 In stem RCS depressurization

)K as changed 151AG2.4.35, New, Memory, Unit 1 In each distractor, use separate lines for each answer. Separated them mange the terminology used in C and D from The Hogging ejector is xperiencing Ejector Stalling. To, The Hogging ejector exhaust exhibits ndication of ejector stalling. Accepted.

24 F 2-3 enerically, in the stem, identify the noun names for all the valves used here, so when they are used in each distractor then the valve number can e used. V 16203 has no noun name. Included.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 ccepted as stated above. OK as changed.

J 60AA2.02, Bank 3314, CA, Unit 1 Handout needed for exam. OK I do not believe that the second parts of distractors A and D are plausible ecause they do not isolate V 6565 which is stated in the IC that the IC VGDT is used to do the release. Because of this I eliminated these as 25 H 3 X lausible. Why would anyone pick this if it didnt isolate the release? Ask icensee.

The explanation for A does not make sense to me! IF the line up is just to he A and C tank, how does the B tank get the discharge to from the taste gas compressor? Ask licensee, how am I seeing this incorrectly?

Replace distractors A and D.

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q SRO U/EJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only uesday, July 13, 2010, 11:13AM S New question replaced old one.

t looks like there is a period in the third bullet (solid) after .Stop valve dditionally, a comma is needed after the V6565 in the same bullet.

Distractors are OK.

Distractor B and D need periods at the end of each and Distractor C only eeds one, there are 2.

be changes make this question Ok 61 AK2.01, Modified Bank 652, Memory, Unit 1 s the answer D supposed to be Channel D or channel B? Ask licensee.

seems like it should be B.

26 F 2-3 5 )therwise appears to be ok.

hursday, September 10, 2009 ccepted and changed distractor D and made it B.

)k E09EK3.3, Bank 1951), Memory, Unit 1 Dommas and quotes where appropriate.

Dhange answer to read Either 1 A or 1 B LPSI pump through Hot Leg injection. As it states in the procedure.

27 F 3

)therwise appears to be Ok.

Ihursday, September 10, 2009 ccepted as written above

)K changed.

28 F 2-3 5

\ppears to be Ok

)03K6,02, New, Memory, Unit 1 29 F 2-3 5 Dommas and quotes as appropriate

\ppears to be Ok.

30 H 2-3 J )04A4.05, New, CA, Unit 1

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1 -5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only n sold pressure control, what is the position of PCV-2201? Is this actually n auto? It is actually in AUTO. Do not believe this is plausible, discuss with licensee why this is, not sure if it is in manual or auto or what the etpoint is.

hursday, September 10, 2009 dded the procedure to the stem.

his is Ok as changed. Was NOT originally a U. Changed to an S.

04G2.4.31, New, CA, Unit 1 31 H 3 5 ppears to be ok C14nit2 32 H 3 S Dommas and quotes as appropriate.

ppears to be Ok Q6ø4ewMe!nor UR Explain why distractor D is plausible.

Suggest that the answers be All B1 2 C 2 1 new answer 33 F 2-3 D2 2 sk licensee what was the basis for the original distractor D.

Fhursday, September 10. 2009 S was the total number of valves on each header.

ccepted as changed by NRC.

)k as changed.

)07A4.lO, New, Memory, Unit 1 34 F 3 ppears to be Ok 35 H 3 5 Use commas and quotes as appropriate ppears to be ok

,,84.PiNewjQUrIt2 Ensure that buses is spelled the same, can use busses or buses but they ieed to be used consistently.

36 H 3 Replace states with identifies

)therwise, appears to be ok

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1 -5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= SRO U/EJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only hursday, September 10. 2009 ccepted as recommended.

1OK1 Q af1k4Q7 CA, Unit 2 onvention for using assuming no operator action. In other questions this as put in parenthesis, so the question would read:

VOOTF would cause the observed conditions? (Assume NO Operator

ctions) 37 H 3 S

)therwise, appears to be Ok bursday, September 10, 2009 ccepted as recommended.

)k as changed.

)1 0K3.02, New, CA, Unit 1 38 H 3 S \ppears to be Ok.

)12A2.03, Modified Bank 2773, Memory, Unit 1 Dhange states to identifies

)uestion was changed and made easier, however, the answer did not hange, Nor did the stem itself, the only thing that changed was to remove 39 F 2 S he procedure that was expected to be identified to take care of the loss.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

rhursday, September 10, 2009 Thanged to bank question.

dd commas and quotes as necessary.

IS this something an P0 is expected to know, the mitigation and use of a OP where ESFAS has or has not been blocked? Ask the licensee to 40 H 3 nsure that Operations agrees with this.

)therwise, appears to be Ok.

Thursday. September 10, 2009

)perations states that the P0 should know. NOT blocked EOP, blocked

)NP.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD Stem Cues r I Cred. JPartial Job- Minutia #1 Back-Q=

SRO U/EJS (F/H) (1-5) TIF Explanation Focus j Dist. j Link units ward K/A Only Un In the stem, is it possible to change EARLIEST to FIRST? DID this?

If distractor B was changed to use the A HPSI header vice the B header, his is still incorrect right? This makes it more plausible.

41 F 3 Is there something that could make distractor C more plausible?

sk licensee to review this OLD NRC question. Plausibility of distractors.

S Thursday, September 10, 2009 Vill change B to the A HPSI header vice B. OK as changed. NOT A U as

)riginally thought. Change to an E.

122A2.05, New, CA, Unit 1 dd commas and quotes where appropriate.

Separate the answers for each question in the distractors, this is to hard to ead with both in one paragraph.

since LCO action statements for ROs are limited to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months or less, istractors B and D could be discounted. This is not allowed for RO xaminations. Discuss with licensee actions to add here that RO

.pplicants would be required to know.

his is considered non plausible hursday, September 10, 2009 42 H 3 X u Rewrote answers, will send uesday July 13, 2010, 11:13AM

)uestion was rewritten.

ommas and quotes as needed.

Ihis is the question that you decided to skip one line between each part of he answer this is ok, however, if you do this, it will be necessary to do it or all the questions that appear like this.

Same comment as above (in green), ask licensee how this is plausible. I

ee where the time went from 6 to 5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months but not sure that this helps any.

Since the answer does not have to deal with a TS, then is this considered rs required knowledge that it has nothing to do with a TS? Discuss with licensee. Still UNSAT! 11:13AM

)26A1.01, New, Memory, Unit 1 kdd commas where necessary bbreviations used in this question are not defined, for example CS, Cont.

43 F 3 . Is this something the applicants will know and not have an issue with hem?

Fhe revision provided with the question of EOP-15 for CTPC is rev 27A ind the rev provided on the reference disc is 30. The reference is Jifferent. (Rev 30 is unit 2)

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only Dhange the containment cooling equipment for distractor C to 1A CS pp with 2800 gpm flow and ONE Cont. Cooling Fan S Discuss with licensee.

rhursday. September 10, 2009 rhey know what CS is. No need to change.

ccepted the change for C.

3Q4 Memory Unit 1 a Urt 2 diffetences 44 F 2-3 S dd commas and quotes where necessary ppears to be Ok

)59A2.04, New, Memory, Unit 1 45 F 2-3 S Thange states to indicates Changed as requested.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

Thange distractor B, 2 A condensate pump trips to MSIS occurs. This will ring in unit differences.

46 F 2-3 )therwise appears to be Ok.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 S

Aakes more challenging question.

dd commas as necessary Separate the first sentence from the second one with a line.

Figures are Ok to be used.

47 H 3 S mange the answer to read 104 gpm gree with handouts for this question.

)therwise appears to be Ok hursday, September 10, 2009 ccepted recommendations.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q SRO UIEJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only

)62G2.4.4, New, CA, Unit 1

\dd commas where necessary.

dd quotes around the procedures names.

dd line space between the WOOTF and the questions.

48 H 3 In each distractor un-capitalize the first Bus

)therwise it appears to be Ok S Thursday, September 10, 2009 ccepted comments above.

k The second part of each answer is NOT elicited. Need to change the iuestion to allow for the second answer. Can change this to a fill in the lank or just add the second question.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

49 H 3 Thursday, September 10, 2009

)hanged this to 2 part question, part 1 and part 2.

Vill fax to see what was done.

uesday, July 13, 2010, 11:13 AM Reformatted Ok with format.

64K1 .02, New, CA, Unit 1 Thange question to read: WOOTF identifies the 1A EDG responds to the ockout relay being reset? Changed as requested.

dd the 1A to EDO in the The 1A EDO will:

50 H 2-3 he second part of each stem, is not asked for in the question stem.

Modify the question to elicit this information.

Ihursday, September 10, 2009

\nd what other conditions running/starting are applicable.

)k as changed.

)73K3,01, New, Memory, Unit 1 rhere is ONLY one monitor, the answer, that has a control function. This flakes the other monitors implausible.

dd another monitor that has a control function but does not result in an 51 F 2-3 unmonitored release, if possible. Ask licensee if there is such a monitor?

Fhursday, September 10, 2009 was replaced with S/G blowdown, will close but if not closed will be nonitored.

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only lso capitalized in stem the word UNMONITORED.

)76k406, New, CA, Unit 1 States to identifies Period at the end of distractor B.

The way that distractors A and B are written, they do not have the word

)perable in them. If an applicant chose an answer because of where the word is he/she would have a 50% chance to get it correct (in this case).

)ut of service does not mean operable or inoperable. Change the wording to reflect what is being asked.

Distractors C and D have reasons why they are or are not operable.

Distractors A and B do not. Add reasons for A and B Reword the question to ask: (the valve was already defined so use the 52 H 2-3 alve number, vice noun name.)

Vith 5B21215 open, which one of the following....

dd to the stem, and why!

hursday, September 10, 2009 Vill send the changes to this question.

uesday, July 13, 2010, 11:13 AM Reformatted.

Need commas in the stem between the valve number and name.

f we are going to use caps for the second part of a question ie. WHY, we hould do this for all the questions.

DK as changed.

)78A3.01, New, Memory, Unit 1 In the stem, 1 00 has a space between the 1 and the first 0. Bridge the jap.

\dd a period at the end of distractor D. Delete the character space in 53 F 2-3 S listractor D which is in front of RESET.

)therwise appears to be Ok Thursday, September 10, 2009 Dhanges were made as requested.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only

)78K402, Bank 1894, CA, Unit 0 In the stem, change the word states to identifies Jery low level CA 54 H 2-3 S

)therwise appears to be Ok.

Ihursday, September 10, 2009 Dhanges made as requested. Ok as changed.

1 o3K3:o2, New, Memory, Unit 0 In the stem, capitalize the word VIOLATION. This will help the applicant e clear on what is being asked.

55 F 2-3 S

)therwse appears to be Ok.

Fhursday, September 10, 2009

)K, changed as requested.

)01K3.02, Bank 2222, CA, Unit 1

\dd in the stem that the rod control switch can not be taken out of the IITHDRAW position.

It is not clear if the rod that is below the group is in group 7. If this is true 56 H 3 han say so.

)therwise appears to be ok.

S Thursday, September 10, 2009 Thanged as requested. Ok

)02K4.10, New, CA, Unit 1 Vhen RCS temperature is listed as that, what is it actually? Th Tc what ave, have licensee explain.

57 H 3 S ppears to be Ok.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 dded as requested, RCS temperature is the cold leg, changed as requested.

1 6K1 .06, New, CA, Unit 1

)n the S/G pressure line, SIG 1 B indicates 88opsia for channel A and B.

Need to put a character space between, 880 and psia. Done How about bolding and capitalizing FAILED LOW where it appears on the 58 H 3 able. So the applicants do not miss one of them. Done The way this question is written, it is hard to read for some reason. There iay not be a way to help that.

)n the stem of the question, capitalize and bold LOCKOUT Done s )therwise appears to be ok

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only Thursday, September 10. 2009 ll accepted.

Ii 7K6.01, Bank 2007, CA, Unit 1 In the stem, operability is used and does not seem appropriate. Use condition. Not sure this is better. Ask licensee to find better word. Used status he second part of the answer, Distractor A and distractor C are the 59 H 2-3 ;ame, however, they are written differently. Change A second part to look ike C second part, which is:

Both channels are NOT used for further calculations. Accepted.

S hursday. September 10. 2009 Thanged from Operability to status.

27K501, New, Memory, Unit 1 n the stem, is it necessary to highlight limit the release to ensue it is read by the applicants? Added this.

For each distractor, put each item on a separate line. It is hard to etermine where the second questions answer starts. As follows for 60 F 3 istractor A:

shield building fans HVE-6A and HVE-6B with charcoal filter trains Demisters to remove water particles and heaters to reduce humidity.

s rhursday, September 10. 2009 ccepted second comment.

)28K201, New, Memory, Unit 1 In the stem the DGs loaded on each respective bus, right? Change this to nake it clearer. Did this Reword the last to:

61 F 3 However, the feeder breaker to MCC 1 A 5 tripped open. This seems learer.

)therwise appears ok.

Fhursday. September 10, 2009 3k as changed.

62 H 2-3 S )29A3.01, Bank 2126, CA, Unit 1

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK L0D (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only ontainment purge, this question may provide information for one of the SRO questions, need to determine which one it is.

SRO question 92 needs to be reviewed to ensure this question does not

)rovide any guidance answering this one and vise virsa.

)therwise it appears to be Ok.

Ihursday, September 10, 2009 Did not provide any information that could be used. Ok as is.

)41A2,02, NEW, CA, Unit 1 63 H 3 S

\ppears to be Ok.

)75A201, New, CA, both units dd commas, Skip a line between the Perform a Unit down... and the distractors.

rhe stem seems to indicate the distractors are the next steps to get done.

This is not what is indicated in the stem. Ask that!

64 H 3 5 Fhe SRO has decided to perform a Unit Shutdown and what are the order rf expected actions he is going to direct his operator to perform.

)therwise appears to be ok.

Thursday. September 10, 2009 hanged as requested above.

)86G2.4.18, New, CA, Units 1 & 2.

dd appropriate commas, dd to the first question, lAW ONP-1 00.2 to ensure the link with this

,rocedure when asking for the Appendix R connection. Did this.

(Ihy would anyone believe that the protective trips are disabled when 65 H 2-3 Joing to ISOLATE? Is this a generic weakness or something? This does iot seem very plausible. Most isolate switch s are a lot of other switches hat have a lot of other idiosyncrasies, ok as it is. OK as is, deed to come up with another reason that is more plausible than this one.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 S )k as is, with change(s) suggested.

2.1.19, New, CA, Unit 1 For distractors C and D, add a comma after however, V is not defined in this question. This needs to be done to insure no 66 H 2-3 S onfusion. Some place.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

hursday, September 10, 2009

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1 -5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= SPO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only Defined GV earlier in the distractor.

32.1,34, New, Memory, Unit 1 Separate each distractor so each thought in on a separate line. This will nake it easier to read. Did this.

Is this operationally valid for the P0 applicants? Ask licensee and 67 F 3 S )perations. YES they are expected.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

rhursday, September 10, 2009 JK as changed as well as RO level. They are expected to know this information.

32.1.4, New, Memory, Unit 0 68 F 2-3 S ppears to be Ok.

5.2.35, New, Memory, Unit 1 Is this something you expect that an P0 is expected to know? Ask Licensee to make sure this is an P0 knowledge. Make sure Operations igrees with this.

69 F 2-3

.ppears to be Ok Thursday, September 10, 2009

)perations state should know this. And they will know this.

5.2.2.39, New, Memory, Unit 1 70 F 2-3 S

.ppears to match KA 32.3.13, New, Memory, Unit 1 In the first sentence, the first letter of the word Unit should be a small letter.

ommas where necessary.

71 F 3 S The KA is sort of matched in that the KA states that Knowledge of radiological safety procedures pertaining to licensed operators luties/radiological control. Well the procedure hits the KA, in that, it asks bout contacting HP to notify the start of the Charging pump.

gree, meets the KA.

72 CA 3 S 32.3.4, Bank, 2034, CA

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIE Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO IJ/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only

\ppears to be ok.

32.4.18, New, Memory, Unit I Dommas where necessary.

\dd to the stem the procedure that directs these actions. We need to insure that there are no other procedures that could be called upon to answer the question. What procedure is it? Are there 2 procedures or ust one? This will tighten up the question.

rhis questions KA is the specific knowledge of EOPs/Emergency Procedures. The question lends itself to identify what actions are 73 F ecessary in the area of interest. This question, however, does NOT natch the KA. Needs to be replaced.

rhursday, September 10, 2009

)uestion was rewritten. Will review after it is sent.

Fuesday, July 13, 2010, 11:13 AM

)uestion completely changed.

s changed Ok.

2.4.2, New, Memory, Unit 1 In the stem, change the word states to the word identifies 74 F 2-3 S ppears to be Ok.

Thursday, September 10, 2009 Thanged as requested.

52.4.6, New, Memory, Unit 1 75 F 3 5 ommas as necessary

.ppears to be Ok.

1 07EG2.4.2O. New, CA, Unit 2 In the stem, after 2-EOP-1 SPTAs add a comma after 2-EOP-1 but before PTAs

)iscussion for distractor C states that it is a recent change (1 1/06/07), this s considered recent? Ask licensee. YES 76 H 2-3 Senerically, place each thought on a separate line, it is hard to read both hen they are on the same line. Separate them out. Done dd to the stem the required procedure, ie OP-521, Emergency Operating Procedure Implementation. Think about re-writing to something like

.. .WOOTF directions CAN be given lAW OP-521 to the crew Done his way there is no reason why the applicants would not know where the requirement comes from.

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO UIEIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only tihat is the required minimum subcooled margin? Ask licensee. Use igure 1 A and/or 1 B. Usually approx. 20 deg F.

)therwise appears to be ok.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

)k as changed.

)09EA2.14, New CA UNIT I dd a comma after the EOP between LOCA. Done Ihat RCS temperature is this representing? Tcold? Ask licensee. ThOt The NOTE prior to step 67 states Cooldown rates up to 100F in any 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months period are permitted to regain o maintain minimum subcooling.

77 H 3 X This seems to be a better second answer then what is presently there.

mange distractors A and B second part to read, Should have been B and C not A.

ool down rates up to 100 F in any one hour are permitted.

S Thursday, September 10, 2009

)hanged B and C to read as recommended.

22AA2O4, New, CA, Unit 2 dd a comma between procedure number and procedure name. Done mange the value of time in B and D to be 0358, this is closer to the limit hen the PZR becomes INOPERABLE. Done s this an SRO only question as well as is this a number expected to be 78 H 3 remembered by SROs ie. The 6 hour6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months time requirement. Ask the licensee f licensee agrees it appears to be ok.

hursday, September 10, 2009, S

)perations expects that the SROs are responsible to know this nformation.

)58AG2.2A, NEW, CA, Unit 1 Do you have to use the full name as Trip Channel Bypass vice channel 79 H 3

)ypass? Would this be more correct or is it Ok the way it is? Ask licensee.

No do not need to use the formal name, as is, is Ok.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO UIE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only dd to the stem, Which one of the following; Between the first sentence ind then the questions. Done

)therwise appears to be ok uesday, July 13, 2010

)Kaschanged.

62AA2 05 New CA Unit 2 Use a comma after the procedure number and noun name.

Put quotes around the noun name for the valve, as was done for the rocedures.

l he level of this question is not considered as CA. This question results rom a direct quote/memory item from the procedure. The level of the luestion needs to be changed. Discuss with licensee.

SRO level, discuss with licensee why it is not!

Replaced Ihis KA with 0038EA1 .41

was unable to write a SRO 80 H 2-3 X luestion, spent many hours trying.

uesday, July 13, 2010 Replaced this question will send for review.

uesday July13 2010 11 13AM

)uestion completely re written S

, New CA NO reference material Is this something an SRO would know from Memory ask licensee 7

f licensee says yes appears to be Ok U )65AG2.4.50, NEW, Memory, Unit 1 Since there is a leak in the containment instrument air system, would this

)ressure be lower than 80 (the setpoint) or lowering. This should be thanged to 79 and lower, to get off the setpoint and then slowly?? Ask licensee. Done, to 79 and slowly lowering.

lVhy is distractor A and B different where the valve MV-i 8-i is listed? Is it listed in B second because of the implication that the EOP would be ntered first? IF so then this seems implausible. Changed B to have the 81 M 2 )rocedure, valve (18-1) then the tripping of the RCPs. Also need to

apitalize CLOSE in distractcr A. (The Answer.)

Separate question 2 into 2 parts, where, the part A few minutes later it vas determined an instrument air leak is occurring, in a sentence prior to he second question. Done Fhis would look like:

1) Which one of the following is performed lAW the ARP?

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9

2. 3._Psychometric_Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q SAC UIEJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only few minutes later it was determined an instrument air leak is occurring.

dded this as recommended.

) If containment air press IS this SRO, and why. Seem that this question can be answered with UST AC knowledge. Selection of appropriate procedures. Strategy or Lction of procedure. Accept as SAC ONLY.

he question is NOT clear if the leak is inside containment, can this be ightened up? Containment instrument is 79 psig and slowly lowering and utside instrument air pressure 105 psig and stable. OK with change.

RE THE ACTIONS ON UNIT 2 DIFFERENT?

5 uesday, July 13, 2010

)K with changes.

37AAiO, New, CA, Unit 1 Thange distractor A to be the total of the 1A and lB SGs together xceeds. .This way there is no dispute that it is a correct answer. Discuss

,ith licensee. Change as requested, this could have been considered JJ orrect.

Vhy would it be expected to select answer C. There seems to be nformation missing concerning the change in leakage from the last reading. If this information is not provided then the applicant can discount his answer on first go around. More information is necessary to make thifl

)Iausible. Ok as is nothing has to change with this one.

Nhy is this entire question considered SAC only? This question is asking 82 H 2-3 he applicant to recall information from the LCO (top) of the TS 3.4.6.2, his is AC knowledge based on the SAC only guidance. Discuss with licensee. Page 4 of SAC only, second part is below the line, states the licensee.

luesday, July 13, 2010 Nill send a re write to use SGs only?

S ruesday. July 13, 2010, 11:13AM uestion re-written. Recommended comments accepted.

)k as changed.

83 H 2-3 )67AG2A.21, New, CA, Unit 1

2. 3._Psychometric_Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U1E1S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only I believe that distractors B and C have a time frame of 15 minutes after th liscovery of the file. Is this true? NO is it 10 mm. How about changing listractors A and B time from 0940 to 0950. This would make the 10 mm s iark from 0940. Discuss with licensee.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

uesday, July 13, 2010 dded uncontrolled in the stem to ensure

)K as is, no changes necessary based on validation.

74EG22A0, New, Unit 1 s this something that an SRO is expected to know from memory? Ask icensee.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

84 H uesday, July 13, 2010 here is a specific objective in the classroom.

)ps states tough but fail question.

Jkas is.

76AA2.04, New, Memory, Unit I dd the word the prior to selected in the stem. Done.

In the stem, change question 1) from what is occurring to what has

)ccurred. Done, Nhy would a crud burst happen if power was constant and nothing

)ccurred to provoke it? Ask licensee if this is plausible. A change in pH vould do this. Not stated in the stem.

85 F 2-3 Nhile the note in the provided procedure indicates that the information

)rovided, only iodine increasing, would be the cause of fuel element allure, how else would the applicant know this? Do we need to add the

)rocedure to lock in this answer, or is this Ok the way it is?

luesday, July 13, 2010 In the stem, remove the word FUEL,

\dd comma between 2202 and Process.

)03G2.1.32, New, CA, Unit 1, dd comma between procedure number and name.

Spell out SNO, what is this? Short Notice Outage 86 H 3 hange distractors A and B first part to look like C and D first part. The RCP may NOT be started with the current RCS/Steam Generator delta T.

Fhis way, it is not highlighted that the temp of the SG is higher, this way he applicant has to determine if it is within the range. IT does not provide rny help. Followed recommendation.

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U1EJS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only lased on the initial conditions, it appears that LTOP would be in service nd does not have to be identified in the stem. Is this correct? No it does S ot have to be identified.

)therwise appears to be ok.

uesday, July 13, 2010

)K with changes made.

)1 0A2.01, Bank (NRC 2004 Exam), CA, Unit 2, Nhat is the purpose of the second Given bullet? Explain Also, in this rtatement, the word method missing from the statement as it is written in he reference. Makes the distractors more credible.

87 H 3 S Is it expected for the SROs to know the expected surveillance number for he heater KW of 155? Ask licensee.

)therwise question appears to be ok.

Fuesday, July 13, 2010

)K as is.

)12G2.4.31, New, Memory, Unit 2 hange the word would to could in the first question. Done In each distractor, where the word however is used, it should be receded and followed by a comma. For example, 88 F 2-3 S .

le did not kill her, however, he wished he had. Done

)therwise appears to be Ok uesday, July 13, 2010

)k as changed.

163A2.01, New, Memory, Unit 1 In the stem there is a statement about the cross tie of the 1 AB and the 1 B DC buses. Is this necessary to describe system lineup, or it is teaching?

B can be aligned to A or B.

89 F 3 S ommas after procedure number and noun name. Done Procedure 1- ONP-50.01, page 14 of 14, flow chart identifies all Ground Isolation procedures as Ground Detection procedures. This is misleading nd should be changed. Will capture in condition report system to fix.

)n the edge of being an SRO knowledge.

2. 3._Psychometric_Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD I (F/H) (1-5) Stem ICues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focusi Dist. Link units ward K/A Only

)therwise appears to be ok.

uesday, July 13, 2010

)K as changed.

76A2.01, Modified Bank (2008 NRC Exam), Unit 2 n the first question, 1), highlight the words immediate attempt by putting uotes around them, as seen above. Done n question 2), start the question by stating WOOTF would be the required ctions if the pump started with the 2C ICW pump valve alignment was onfigured to the B side but the electrical alignment remained on the A side? Done 90 F 3 S . . .

In question 2, which pump is postulated in starting? Is it the 2C or the 2B ump from above? This is the 2C pump.

Meets the requirements for modification.

)therwise appears to be Ok.

ruesday, July 13, 2010

)K the way it was changed.

)27A2.01, New, CA, Unit 2 i In question 1), add comma after .. -03, and put name in quotes.

rhe way the distractors are written is confusing. Done For distractors A and B, add After before consultation. Done For distractors C and D, add, After consultation with the TSC with any H2 oncentration when H 2 Recombiners are NOT available. Done.

91 H 3 Distractors that have High Containment temperature, are NOT plausible.

Fhis does not make sense that a high containment temp would cause the tdsorber bed temp hi alarm. Come up with another reason. This is not a jood one. Seems like this is a valid distractor based on validation.

)hange this from a U to an E, initial review.

S uesday, July 13, 2010 manges made are Ok.

129G2.4.50, New, CA, Unit 1 he reference material provided does not show the TS internal pressure o 0.7 psig, not sure where this came from, ask licensee to show. Correct

)omment 92 H 2-3 Found TS 3.6.1.4, which identifies the -0.7 psig value.

Based on the TS 3.6.1.4 Primaiy containment internal pressure shall be maintained between 0.7 and 2.4 PSIG. It appears that this knowledge is RO knowledge and is a 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months or less TS. The way this luestion is written is RO and NOT SRO ONLY knowledge. This needs to e changed.

ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/F/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only uesday, July 13, 2010 Vill receive a NEW copy that made the second part SRO only.

uesday, July 13. 2010 11:13 AM S Replacement question ppears to be Ok.

)34K4.03, New, Memory, Unit 2 dd a comma after procedure number and put procedures in quotes, also

-idd a space between the first 2 sentences. (one more space prior to ppendix F).

hange the stem to read; s the Refueling SRO, WOOTF identifies the direction you would provide o the Refueling Machine operator and why? Done 93 F 3 Distractor D, does not make sense to me and therefore not plausible.

Vhen it is read it talks about the Bridge and Trolley manual positioning...

his information is NOT presented in the question and therefore could be ruled out.

Replace distractor D!

uesday, July 13, 2010 S Viii leave distractor D as is, there were no validators that selected this

-tnswer. It is identified in the procedure which I did not see before.

2.1.1, New, Memory, Unit 2 94 F 3 S .dd commas where needed.

ppears to be Ok.

2i 9, New, CA, Unit 2 95 H 3 S ppears to be Ok 2.2i7, New, Memory, Unit 0 96 F 2-3 S uestion appears to be ok, not very challenging 2.2.43, New, Memory, Unit 1 Did not receive ADM 17.18.

97 F 3 5 Skip a line space after the first sentence, as done in question 98.

ppears to be Ok.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U1E1S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 22,11, Bank (NRC 2004), Memory, Unit I (is this KA correct, have te 98 F 3 S heck it out, seems like it is out of place),

ppears to be Ok.

3.2.4.19, LAST NRC EXAM, CA, Unit 1 99 CA 3 S ppears to be Ok.

32.4,30, New, Memory, Unit 0 Vhat ever convention has been used, highlight the word REQUIRED in 100 F 2-3 S he stem to ensure the applicants read it.

ppears to be Ok.

3RO ONLY 5 Unsats I enhancements.

12 sats RO 11 Unsats 4 enhancements (0 sats ES-401, Rev. 9 2 Form ES-401 -9

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ST. LUCIE Date of Exam: December 15, 2009 Exam Lev1 Initials a b c Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading RSB NA

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and RSB documented

3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors RSB (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, RSB as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades RSB are justified

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of RSB questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed_Name/SJgature Date

a. Grader Richard S. 01/21/2010

b. Facility Reviewer(*) NA

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Mark A. Bates! /2Z1 ]ETh 01/25/2010

d. NRC Supervisor (*) Malcolm T. Widmann/ .

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

O:\St. Lucie Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\QA documents\St Lucie 2009 301 and 302 Written Exa Grading Qal Check list (rsb)ES-403-1 .doc

ML15142A400

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

= = = = = = = =

= = = = = = = = =

Navigation menu

ML15142A400

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

= = = = = = = =

= = = = = = = = =

Navigation menu

Search