ML021280630
| ML021280630 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar |
| Issue date: | 05/08/2002 |
| From: | Padovan L NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2 |
| To: | Scalice J Tennessee Valley Authority |
| Padovan L, NRR/DLPM, 415-1423 | |
| References | |
| TAC MB1884 | |
| Download: ML021280630 (7) | |
Text
May 8, 2002 Mr. J. A. Scalice Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: TRITIUM PRODUCTION PROGRAM INTERFACE ISSUE 5 (TAC NO. MB1884)
Dear Mr. Scalice:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has reviewed your letter of August 20, 2001, requesting an amendment to the operating license for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
Tennessee Valley Authoritys (TVAs) proposed amendment would modify the Technical Specifications related to irradiation of tritium producing burnable absorber rods in the reactor core.
We need additional information to complete our review and have prepared the attached request for additional information (RAI). Please refer to Interface Issue 5 in your reply. I discussed the enclosed RAI with Mr. Chardos, TVAs Tritium Program Manger, and he agreed to respond to this request by May 17, 2002. Please contact me on 301-415-1423 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
/RA/
L. Mark Padovan, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-390
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/ enclosure: See next page
May 8, 2002 Mr. J. A. Scalice Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: TRITIUM PRODUCTION PROGRAM INTERFACE ISSUE 5 (TAC NO. MB1884)
Dear Mr. Scalice:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has reviewed your letter of August 20, 2001, requesting an amendment to the operating license for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
Tennessee Valley Authoritys (TVAs) proposed amendment would modify the Technical Specifications related to irradiation of tritium producing burnable absorber rods in the reactor core.
We need additional information to complete our review and have prepared the attached request for additional information (RAI). Please refer to Interface Issue 5 in your reply. I discussed the enclosed RAI with Mr. Chardos, TVAs Tritium Program Manger, and he agreed to respond to this request by May 17, 2002. Please contact me on 301-415-1423 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
/RA/
L. Mark Padovan, Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-390
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/ enclosure: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC PDII-2 R/F TKoshy BClayton (Hard Copy)
MPadovan MReinhart OGC PFredrickson SLaVie ACRS ADAMS ACCESSION NO:ML021280630 OFFICE PDII-2/PM PDII-2/LA PDII-2/ASC NAME MPadovan BClayton TKoshy DATE 5/02/02 5/02/02 5/03/02 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Enclosure Request for Additional Information Tritium Production Program Interface Issue 5 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 Docket No. 50-390 1.
Section 2.15.6 of Enclosure 4, Westinghouse Report NDP-00-0344," of Tennessee Valley Authoritys (TVAs) August 20, 2001, amendment request addresses radiological consequences of various design basis accidents affected by the addition of tritium-producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs) to the Watts Bar reactor. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff needs additional information to make the requisite finding that the consequences of the accidents are consistent with regulatory criteria. Please refer to Regulatory Information Summary 2001-019, Deficiencies in the Documentation of Design Basis Radiological Analyses Submitted in Conjunction with License Amendment Requests, for a more complete discussion of the staffs expectations in regard to analysis descriptions. Please provide the information requested below or give us a specific reference if you have already docketed some of this information. For each accident analyzed:
Provide a tabulation of all analysis inputs and assumptions used in offsite and control room habitability analyses in sufficient detail to enable the staff to evaluate the appropriateness of these data and, if deemed necessary, to perform confirmatory calculations.
Describe any analysis methodology or modeling that is different from that previously approved by the NRC in a licensing action for Watts Bar. Please justify each change. This includes any changes in the determination of atmospheric dispersion values (X/Q) for offsite or control room intake.
Please provide a substantiated basis for assuming 51 cfm control room unfiltered in leakage. Justify your "positive pressure means no in-leakage" assumption in light of industry experience on this subject.
The NRCs letter of April 25, 2002, contained a second RAI on Interface Issue 7, questioning the ability of the TPBAR consolidation canister load-handling equipment to meet single failure criteria. If TVA does not address this under Interface Issue 7, please provide an analysis of the offsite and control room doses resulting from a dropped consolidation canister containing 300 TPBARs to demonstrate that the event is, in fact, bounded by the drop of a single assembly containing 24 TPBARs.
2.
Section 1.5.5 of Enclosure 4 to TVAs letter of August 20, 2001, discusses control room habitability. The discussion appears to be limited to the emergency core cooling system leakage component of the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA). You refer to Table 2.15.6-2 as the basis for TVAs conclusion that General Design Criterion 19 (GDC -19) will continue to be met.
We note that the language of GDC-19 is not restricted to LOCAs, but applies to all accidents.
Please explain how TVAs conclusion that meeting GDC-19 addresses all of the design-basis radiological accidents considered in the Watts Bar Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. If TVA based this conclusion on the LOCA being the limiting accident, please justify this conclusion addressing the following:
the impact of accident-specific differences in release point configuration (e.g., upwind direction and distance, release point height, diffuse or point source, etc.)
the impact of accident-specific differences in the activation of control room protective features inherent delays associated with these differences (e.g., instantaneous safety injection signal versus radiation monitor alarm) the impact of accident-specific differences in source terms on monitor response and isolation delay in reaching set point if actuation is based on radiation monitor response mode-dependent engineered safety feature operability for the fuel-handling accident versus at-power accidents, including the impact this may have on control room unfiltered in-leakage 3.
TVA analyzed the total effective dose equivalent as well as whole body and thyroid doses to determined radiological consequence from TPBARs being in the reactor. TVAs submittal of August 20, 2002, does not appear to request that the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) dose quantity and its associated dose criteria will replace the whole body and thyroid dose guidelines currently in the Watts Bar licensing basis. Please confirm our understanding that future design basis accident radiological analyses, intended to demonstrate compliance with regulatory criteria, will continue to assess whole body and thyroid doses, as well as TEDE, for tritium.
Mr. J. A. Scalice Tennessee Valley Authority WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT cc:
Mr. Karl W. Singer, Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. Jon R. Rupert, Vice President (Acting)
Engineering & Technical Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. William R. Lagergren, Site Vice President Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, TN 37381 General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, TN 37902 Mr. Robert J. Adney, General Manager Nuclear Assurance Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. Mark J. Burzynski, Manager Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. Paul L. Pace, Manager Licensing and Industry Affairs Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, TN 37381 Mr. Larry S. Bryant Manager Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Spring City, TN 37381 Senior Resident Inspector Watts Bar Nuclear Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, TN 37381 Rhea County Executive 375 Church Street Suite 215 Dayton, TN 37321 County Executive Meigs County Courthouse Decatur, TN 37322 Mr. Lawrence E. Nanney, Director Division of Radiological Health Dept. of Environment & Conservation Third Floor, L and C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1532 Ms. Ann Harris 341 Swing Loop Road Rockwood, Tennessee 37854 Dr. Gary Drinkard 340 Drinkard Dr.
Spring City, TN 37381 Ms. Vickie G. Davis TDEC-DOE Oversight Division 761 Emory Valley Road Oak Ridge, TN 37830-7072