Information Notice 1995-03, Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory and Potential Loss of Emergency Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML003727420)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory and Potential Loss of Emergency Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition
ML003727420
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/03/2000
From: Marsh L
Operational Experience and Non-Power Reactors Branch
To:
Benner, Eric
References
IN-95-003, Suppl 2
Download: ML003727420 (5)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

July 3, 2000

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 95-03, SUPPLEMENT 2: LOSS OF REACTOR COOLANT

INVENTORY AND POTENTIAL LOSS

OF EMERGENCY MITIGATION

FUNCTIONS WHILE IN A

SHUTDOWN CONDITION

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have ceased

operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice supplement

to alert addressees to insights from inspections related to losses of reactor coolant while the

reactor is in a hot, pressurized, shutdown condition with the potential for adversely affecting

accident mitigation capability. It is expected that recipients will review the information in this

supplement for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid

similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice supplement are

not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

Background

Information Notice 95-03, "Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory and Potential Loss of Emergency

Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition," issued on January 18, 1995, discusses an

incident at Wolf Creek involving the loss of reactor coolant while the reactor was in a hot, pressurized, shutdown condition. At Wolf Creek, all residual heat removal (RHR) and

emergency core cooling system (ECCS) pump suction lines are supplied by a common suction

header. When the loss of reactor coolant occurred, hot reactor coolant system (RCS) water

was introduced into this common suction header between the refueling water storage tank

(RWST) and the RHR and ECCS pumps. This hot water flashed to steam, resulting in a

steam/water mixture in the header. Had an ECCS actuation occurred, this mixture could have

been introduced into the suction of the ECCS pumps. If operators had not been able to

terminate the event, the hot water in the suction piping may have led to steam binding, which

could have adversely affected the pumps in both ECCS trains. In addition, water flashing to

steam in the header and the RWST could have caused serious mechanical damage to the RHR

piping and the RWST as a result of water hammer. Finally, the flow path from the RCS through

the RWST establishes a containment bypass path.

ML003727420

IN 95-03, Supp. 2 The NRC issued Generic Letter (GL) 98-02, "Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory and Associated

Potential for Loss of Emergency Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition," on

May 28, 1998, to request that addressees (1) perform an assessment to determine if their

ECCSs include certain design features, such as a common pump suction header, which can

render the systems susceptible to common-cause failure and if this susceptibility is found, (2)

prepare, with consideration of plant-specific design attributes, a description of the features of

their Appendix B quality assurance program (for example, the methods used to verify valve

position; the controls in place to ensure compliance with plant surveillance, maintenance, modification, and operating procedures; and the adequacy of operator training for such

activities) that provide assurance that the safety-related functions of the RHR system and the

ECCS will not be adversely affected by activities conducted at hot shutdown.

This information notice supplement discusses additional insights that have been gained from

NRC inspections performed in response to GL 98-02.

Discussion

Licensee and staff analyses of the Wolf Creek event assumed failure to isolate the RCS

draindown path. If this were to occur, within 5 minutes, the reactor vessel water level could

drain to the bottom of the hot leg, and, as a consequence, the operating RHR pump would lose

suction, cavitate, and fail. Continued boiloff would result in uncovering of the core in less than 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. Failure to quickly isolate the flow path could also result in the RWST suction header filling

with steam, which would continually discharge into the RWST. This steam could lead to water

hammer events with the potential for mechanical damage to pump components, piping, and

tank structural components.

A special NRC report dated March 1995 and titled "Reactor Coolant System Blowdown at Wolf

Creek on September 17, 1994" (AEOD/S95-01), identified 19 loss-of-coolant events that have

occurred at reactors during shutdown. Of these 19 events, only 2 have taken place at

temperatures and pressures sufficient to result in voiding RWST piping. Considering

pressurized-water reactor operating experience, the staff estimated the initiating event

frequency may be equal to or greater than 1E-3 per reactor year. The initiating event frequency

and the heavy dependence upon short-term operator action highlight the importance of careful

planning, the accuracy of administrative procedures, and disciplined adherence to those

procedures.

GL 98-02 focused on requesting that affected licensees take adequate protective measures to

minimize the likelihood of a Wolf Creek type event. The generic letter was not intended to

address all aspects related to recovery from a shutdown loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA).

However, during NRC inspections performed in response to GL 98-02, the staff identified a

potentially generic weakness regarding the procedures used to mitigate a Wolf Creek type

event that licensees may wish to review.

At one facility, the procedure used to recover from a hot, pressurized shutdown LOCA directs

operator actions that could increase the probability that ECCS equipment would be disabled

and could delay recovery from the LOCA. Specifically, for entry conditions in which the

pressurizer level is less than 10 percent or RCS subcooling is less than 32 degrees C (58 degrees F), and the RWST level is greater than 27 percent, that is, a Wolf Creek type scenario,

IN 95-03, Supp. 2 closure of the RHR hot-leg isolation valves are not explicitly directed early in the procedure, and, as such, the LOCA is not terminated. The procedure subsequently directs alignment of

the suction of the operating centrifugal charging pump to the common suction header, potentially exposing it to hot reactor coolant and rendering it inoperable. If that centrifugal

charging pump is rendered inoperable, the operator is expected to evaluate aligning the suction

of the second centrifugal charging pump to the common suction header, exposing it to the

same conditions which rendered the first centrifugal charging pump inoperable. This

progression continues with the two safety injection pumps, potentially rendering them

inoperable, also, and could ultimately result in a significant loss of ECCS capability.

Related Generic Communications

ÿ

GL 98-02, "Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory and Associated Potential for Loss of

Emergency Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition," May 28, 1998.

ÿ

Information Notice 95-03, "Loss of Coolant Inventory and Potential Loss of Emergency

Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition," January 18, 1995.

ÿ

Supplement to Information Notice 95-03, March 25, 1996.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. However, recipients are

reminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC

information notices), where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations

under Section 50.65, "Requirements for monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance at nuclear

power plants," of Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If you have any

questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact listed below

or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA/

Ledyard B. Marsh, Chief

Events Assessment, Generic Communications

and Non-Power Reactors Branch

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contact:

Eric J. Benner, NRR

301-415-1171 E-mail: ejb1@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

IN 95-03, Supp. 2 closure of the RHR hot-leg isolation valves are not explicitly directed early in the procedure, and, as such, the LOCA is not terminated. The procedure subsequently directs alignment of

the suction of the operating centrifugal charging pump to the common suction header, potentially exposing it to hot reactor coolant and rendering it inoperable. If that centrifugal

charging pump is rendered inoperable, the operator is expected to evaluate aligning the suction

of the second centrifugal charging pump to the common suction header, exposing it to the

same conditions which rendered the first centrifugal charging pump inoperable. This

progression continues with the two safety injection pumps, potentially rendering them

inoperable, also, and could ultimately result in a significant loss of ECCS capability.

Related Generic Communications

ÿ

GL 98-02, "Loss of Reactor Coolant Inventory and Associated Potential for Loss of

Emergency Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition," May 28, 1998.

ÿ

Information Notice 95-03, "Loss of Coolant Inventory and Potential Loss of Emergency

Mitigation Functions While in a Shutdown Condition," January 18, 1995.

ÿ

Supplement to Information Notice 95-03, March 25, 1996.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. However, recipients are

reminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC

information notices), where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations

under Section 50.65, "Requirements for monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance at nuclear

power plants," of Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If you have any

questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact listed below

or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA/

Ledyard B. Marsh, Chief

Events Assessment, Generic Communications

and Non-Power Reactors Branch

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical contact:

Eric J. Benner, NRR

301-415-1171 E-mail: ejb1@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

Accession Number #ML003727420

  • see previous concurrence

Document name: G:\\REXB\\EJB1\\IN9503S2.WPD

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy

OFFICE

REXB

TECH ED

RII

RII

SRXB

NAME

E Benner*

B Calure*

R Gibbs*

P Frederickson*

M Razzaque*

DATE

6/9/2000

6/8/2000

6/16/2000

6/21/2000

6/23/2000

OFFICE

SRXB

REXB

NAME

J Wermiel*

L Marsh

DATE

6/27/2000

07/03/2000

/

/2000

/

/2000

/

/2000

[OFFICIAL RECORD COPY]

___________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

Attachment

IN 9503 - Supp. 2 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issuance

Issued to

________________________________________________________________________________

2000-09

Steam Generator Tube Failure

Indian Point Unit 2

06/28/2000

All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors except

those who have ceased

operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel

2000-08

Inadequate Assessment of the

Effect of Differential

Temperatures on Safety-

Related Pumps

5/15/2000

All holders of operating licensees

for nuclear power reactors

2000-07

National Institute for

Occupational Safety and

Health Respirator User Notice:

Special Precaustions for Using

Certain Self-Contained

Breathing Apparatus Air

Cylinders

4/10/2000

All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors, non- power reactors, and all fuel cycle

and material licensees required to

have an NRC-approved

emergency plan

2000-06

Offsite Power Voltage

Inadequacies

3/22/2000

All holders of operating licenses

for nuclear power reactors, except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor

2000-05

Recent Medical

Misadministrations Resulting

from Inattention to Detail

3/06/2000

All medical licensees

2000-04

1999 Enforcement Sanctions

for Deliberate Violations of

NRC Employee Protection

Requirements

2/25/2000

All NRC licensees

2000-03 High-Efficiency Particulate Air

Filter Exceeds Mass Limit

Before Reaching Expected

Differential Pressure

2/22/2000

All NRC licensed fuel-cycled

conversion, enrichment, and

fabrication facilities