JAFP-97-0325, Forwards Response to Recent Request for Addl Info Pertaining to Proposed TS Amend to Delete Requirements for Plant PORC to Review Fire Protection Program & Implementing Procedures

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to Recent Request for Addl Info Pertaining to Proposed TS Amend to Delete Requirements for Plant PORC to Review Fire Protection Program & Implementing Procedures
ML20198H206
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1997
From: Michael Colomb
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
JAFP-97-0325, JAFP-97-325, NUDOCS 9709160197
Download: ML20198H206 (23)
v • d • e


Text

e.

  • J:mes A. Fn Patrick

% Nuclear Eower Ptrit 268 Lats Rotd 6 p o go 41 Lycoming New York 13093 l

315 342 3840

  1. > NewYo.rkPower uien,eu. coio,n3

& Authonty s.1. e eevi,v. omc.,

1 September 9, 1997 JAFP-97-0325 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

! Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station P1 137 l

Washington, D.C. 20555 i

SUBJECT:

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant l Docket No. 50 333 I Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Proposed Technical Specification change to Section 6.5.1.6

References:

1. USNRC letter, Karen R. Cotton to James Knubel, dated June 25, 1997

Dear Sir:

This 16tter transmits the Authority's response to a recent request for additional information pertaining to a proposed Technical Specification Amendment to delete the requirements for the Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC) to review the fire protection program and implementing procedures.

Attachment 1 provides a response to the requests for information regarding the screening process used for the determination that a safety evaluation or an environmental impact evaluation is required, how procedure changes are documented, reviewed, approved, and implemented, and the administrative burden that would be eliminated from the PORC.

Attachment 2 is a table listing the fire protection program changes that were reviewed by PORC for the previous 2 years.

There are no commitments contained in this response if you have any questions, please contact Mr. Robert Steigerwald at (315) 349 6209.

Very truly yours;

%& Michael J. Colomb 7)

MJC:RS:las cc: next page

,,,, ,m ;.n n, Ill.l!Wi.lOl.l]I.ll!I.llM. ll.ll!!I.ll

@709 Ho olqq

R:gional Administrator U. S. Nuct;;r R:gul: tory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 i

Office of the Resident inspector U. S. Nucles. Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 136 Lycoming, NY 13093 ,

i

- Ms. K. Cotton, Acting Project Manager Project Directorate 11

. Division of Reactor Projects l/Il U. S. Nuclear Reguicory Comrr.ission Mail Stop 14 B2 Washington, DC 20555 Mr. F. William Valentino, President New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension Albany, NY 12203 6399

.7 - . - -

j Attxhm:nt 1

!* Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Snecification Change to Smetion 6.5.1.8 l

Request 1:

j Provide a ':::-!pt . of the screening process for the fire protection program and l ,

procedures and of the criteria used to determine whether or not a safety evaluation j and/or an environmental impact evaluation is needed.

Response

' AP-02.04, Revision 8 " Control of Procedures", requires Technical Specification j related procedures to have nuclear safety and environmental impact screens j completed, por MCW4, " Nuclear Safety and Environmental impact Screens and

Nuclear Safety Evaluations", during the revision process.

f .

l Technical Specifications section 6.8.(A).3 establishes procedures which implement j the Fire Protection Program as Technical Specification related procedures, j Administrative procedure AP-14.01, " Fire Protection Program", section 8.1.4 j invokes the MCM 4 process for Fire Protection Plan revisions. The MCM 4 process j generically described below applies to procedures which implemant the Fine L Protection Program.

i i The requirements of 10CFR50.59 are implemented via a Modification Control

! Manual (MCM) procedure, MCM-4, revision 4, " Nuclear Safety and Environmental l Impact Screens and Nuclear Safety Evaluations." MCM-4 is used in conjunction j with other procedures to control a variety of activities such as Modificatic.1s and

Procedure Changes (Operating, Maintenance, Surveillance, Administrative, etc.), to achieve compliance with 10CFR50.59.

MCM-4 uses a two step process. The first step is a screen to determine if a i Nuclear Safety Evaluation (NSE) is required. The second step, if required, is to perform the detailed safety evaluation, j Nuclear Safety and Environmental Impact Screens (NSEIS) are used to determine if a proposed activity requires a 10CFR50.59L Nuclear Safety Evaluation, a Technical l

Specification Amendment, or an Environmental impact review. NSEIS consist of I five questions which are broken into multiple parts. The answers are prepared by a j qualified individual following the requirements and guidance in the MCM-4.

The first three questions of the NSEIS pertain to the Safety Analysis Report (SAR).

4 The FSAR sections that were reviewed in answering the NSEl questions are required i to be listed. The first part of each of these three questions determines if the activity being performed is: (1) described in the SAR, or (2) affects SSCs described j in the SAR, or (3) involves a test. Written guidance is provided to the preparer to 4 determine what needs to be considered when deciding if the information is i

described in the SAR. A "YES" answer to any of these three questions requires i that the remaining parts of the question be answered. The remaining parts

} determine if the activity being performed is consistent with the requirements of the

! SAR. Written guidance is provided to the preparer in answering these questions.

The questions are posed such that a "YES" answer requires en NSE to be Page 1 of 4

i Attachm:nt 1 i- Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Snecification Chance to Section 8.5.1.8 performed. "NO" answers do not require an NSE but do require written justification 4- as to why the activity la consistent with the requirements of the SAR.

2

The fourth question pertains to the facility Technical Specification. The first part of
this question determines if tbg activity involves items described in the facility l Technical Specification.- The lechnical Specification sections that were reviewed in I

! answering the questions are required to be listed. A "YES" answer to this part of

the' question requires that the remaining parts be answc. red. The remaining parts of l I the question determine if the activity is consistent with the Technical Specification.

I "YES" answers require that a Technical Specification Amendment be processed in l accordance with Licensing procedures. "NO" answers require written justification

as to why the activity is consistent with the requirements of the Technical 1 Specification, i

) The fifth question determines if the task has radiological or a non radiological environmental impact. A "YES" answer requires notification of the Radiological

! Environmental Services Manager for the preparation of an Environmental impact

review, i

i

- NSEIS are completed and approved by qualified safety reviewers per MCM-4 l

revision 4. The approver checks for completeness, procedure compliance, and sound logic of the written justifications and conclusions.

l j' Request 2:

j For fire protection program and procedure changes that do not require a safety

evaluadon or environmental impact evaluation, describe how the changes are documented, reviewed, approved, and implemented. Identify whether or not the l
process is procedurainted and identify the organizational responsibilities for following
  • the process, whether proceduralized or not.

Response

AP-02.04, revision 8, " Control of Procedures," govern the process for controlling the properation, review, approval, issuance, and revision of procedures. AP 02.01, j " Procedure Writing Manual," describes the standard format for site procedures and supplementa AP 02.04.

i i

1 Page 2 of 4

. o Attachment 1 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Snacification change to Baction 8.5.1.8 The Site Executive Officer assigns a Responsible Procedure Owner (RPO) for each procedure. The RPO is the management individual having overall responsibility for the adequacy and accwacy of the procedure controlling the specified activities. The RPO is responsible for preparation of procedures and assigns procedure writers knowledgeable in the area being addressed by the procedure and in the requirements of AP-02.01, revision 6. The RPO is also responsible for ensuring that new procedures, revisions, and withdrawals are properly reviewed (including cross-disciplinary), approved r.nd implemented in accordance with AP-02.04, " Control of Procedures."

Procedure chsngn may be accomplished as temporary or permanent changes.

Temporary changes are limited to non-intent changes. The review requirements for both permanent and temporary changes are the same. The review requirements require two Qualified Technical Reviewers (OTMs) knowledgeable in the affected functional areas and additional cross disciplinary reviewers as identified by the QTRs, AP-02.04, or the Responsible Procedure Owner (RPO).- Approval of permanent changea are made by the responsible procedure owner, and since Fire Protection implementing procedures are Technical Specification related, the RPO's General Manager or the Site Executive Officer,in accordance with AP 02.04 The JAF Fire Protection Program'(FPP) is described in administrative procedure AP-14.01, " Fire Protection, Program", along with the change controls for the various documents included in the FPP. The FPP is divided in to " bases" documents and

" supporting" documents. The FPP " bases" documents include the Fire Protection Plan, FSAR sections containing fire protection related information, fire protection related portions of AP-01.04, " Technical Specification Related Requirements, Lists, and Tables," and AP 14.01; changes to these " bases" documents require a full Nuclear Safety Evaluation per MCM-4, which require PORC review, The FPP

" supporting" documents include the Fire Hazards Analysis and the 10CFR50, Appendix R Reassessment which require a 10CFR50.59 Safety impact Screen per MCM-4 for all changes. AP-14.01 classifies FPP working procedures as Technical Specification Related (TSR) thereby ensuring each revision will receive a 10CFR50.59 Safety impact Screen. FPP Pre-Fire Plans are controlled per AP 14.01 which establishes the Fire Protection Supervisor as the RPO and require two qualified technical reviewers per AP-02.04. Per AP-14.01, one of the OTR's shall be an Operations department SRO for changes to Pre-Fire Plans containing safety related equipment. In addition, AP-02.04 requires that fire protection related procedures require an additional screening process to determine if the proposed changes could effect 10 CFR 50.48, Appendix R requirements or Branch Technical Position (BTP) 9-5.1, Appendix A guidelines.

The James A. FitzPatrick plant has procedurally controlled programs in place which define the fire protection program and the process for controlling changes to the fire protection program and procedures. The strength of these processes is based upon the multiple level of qualified reviews fu new and revised procedures. An additional PORC review does not provide any additional safety benefit and is an administrative burden to PORC.

Page 3 of 4

Att:-:hm:nt 1 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed

. Technical Snecification Change to Section 6.5.1.6 i-i Request 3:

I For the previous 2 years, provide an itemised summary of the fire protection i program changee' that were reviewed by the PORC. In addition, for each item, indcate 11 whether er riot it would have required a safety and/or environmental i impact evaluation and therefore, PORC review, if the proposed TS amendment had  !

been in place durhg that period, enj 1 if the PORC approved the change as proposed or required a change in the proposal which provided a safety benefit, in

! . the context of the information provided, be more specific regarding the j administrative burden that would be eliminated from the PORC.

Response

l Attachment 2 provides a table which lists the fire protection program changes from July 1995 through June 1997. The table also shows whether a safety and/or onvironmental impact evaluation would have been required if the amendment was in place,if the PORC approved the change as proposed, or required a change in the l

j proposal which provided a safety benefit. As the table in attachment 2 indicates i

there were a large number of changes presented to the PORC. The majority of these changes were administrative in nature and did not require a safety evaluation l~ and/or environmental impact evaluation. Also, the PORC review did not make any l

changes to the proposals that added any safety benefit. The determination that PORC did not add any safety benefit was based on a review of the PORC minutes -

l e

and did not include a review of pre-PORC member review comments. It is important l

to note that regardless if the proposed TS amendment was in place or not the same process would have been used to determine if a safety evaluation and/or environmental impact evaluation was required, as described above. The PORC I- would be alleviated from the administrative burden of reviewing all changes to the fire protection program by allowing the current process, described above, to control

[

' the program changes. Any changes to the licensing bases would require a PORC I review of the change via the safety evaluation and/or environmental impact i evaluation. 4 l

k l

1 I

i Page 4 of 4 f

i Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Soscification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6

! PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY 3 PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (YlN) BENEFIT (Y/N) .

AP-01.04 10 Tech Spec Related Requirements, Lists, and Y N Tables * (JAF-SE-95-096, R1) i (JAF-SE-94-108, RO)  !

AP-14.01 O Fire Protection Program

AP-14.02 4 Combustibles and Flammable Material N N Control' ,

AP-14.02 5 Combustibles and Flammable Material N N Control' .

ARP-FPP-A 2 CO2 System Hose Reel Actuated Alarms Red N N Light

  • ARP-FPP-B 3 Water Spray Valve 'Open Alarms Red Light
  • N N ARP-FPP-C 4 CO2 System High Temperature Alarms N N l ARP-FPP-D 3 Water Spray Systems High Temperature N N t Alarms Yellow Light
  • ARP-FPP-E 3 Water Spray Systein Supervisory Alarm Green N N Light
  • ARP-FPP-F 3 CO2 System Supervisory Alarms Green Light' N N ,[

Page 1 of 17 i

Attachment 2 Response to 3Al Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chanoe .o Section 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

ARP-FPP-G 3 fonizatio1 Detectors - Smoke Detected Yellow N N Light

  • ARP-FPP-H 2 fonization Detectors - Supervisory Alarm N N Green Light *

, ARP-FPP-l 2 Fire Door Alarm - Open Red Light' N N l

l ARP-FPP-J 2 Multiplexer Trouble Green Light

  • N N l ARP-FPP-K 2 CO210-Ton Tank Pressure High/Lov or Level N N Low Green Light' ARP-FPP-L 2 CO2 3-Ton Tank Pressure High/ Low or Level N N-Low Green Light
  • ARP-FPP-N 2 Diesel Fire Pump Trouble Green Light
  • N N ARP-FPP-O 2 Electric Fire Pump - Loss of Power Gre ,n N N Light' ARP-FPP-Q 3 Foam System Not Reset Alarm Green Light
  • N N ARP-FPP-R 3 Wetpipe Sprinkler System Actuation Alarms N N Red Light
  • ARP-FPP-S 2 Header Valve Position Alarms Green Light
  • N N e!

ARP-FPP-T 4 CO2 System Valve Open Alarms Red Light' N N Page 2 of 17

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chanoe to Section 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY  :

PROCEDURE NO. NG. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (YlN)

ARP-FPP-V 3 HPCI Foam System Flow Alarm Red Light" N N ARP-FPP-W 2 A(B) Standby Gas Treatment Train - High N N Temperature Yellow Light

  • ARP-FPP-Y 1 EPIC Halon System Detection System Ye!!ow N N Light" 1 ARP-FPP-Z 1 EPIC Halon System Activation Red Light' N N FO-AD-OO3-41802 O Nuclear Plant Services Quality Assurance N N  ?

Records for FitzPatrick* t FO-OP-032-41802 2 Setup and Operating Procedure for RDS-1000 N N  :

Unit #9 at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear

  • FPP-1.0 11 Fire Protection and Prevention Program
  • N N FPP-1.15 0 Out Buildings Emergency Action and Fire N N i Protection Plan
  • i i

FPP-1.16 0 Fire Panel Alarm Response-Non-Power Block' N N )

l FPP-2.21 Withdrawn Training Center North Region Monthly Check

  • N N *f l

Page 3 of 17

_. ._..m_ . _ . . . _ _ .._..._.. ._ _ _ _ _. - . .._ . . _ _ _ _ _ _.

Attachrnent 2 Response to RAI RegardinD Proposed Technical Specification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6 I I

j PORC

, RECOMMENDED ,

CHANGES TO DOCURIENT  ;

REVISION W/ SAFETY -[

PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEF9T (Y/N) '

j t FPP-3.12 2 Fire inspection Power Block

  • N N FPP-3.13 2 Fire inspection Non-Power Block
  • N N FPP-3.13 3 Fire inspection /Non-Power Block
  • N N  !

FPP-3.14 2 Warehouse #2 Sprinkler Test

  • N N FPP-3.14 3 Warehouse #2 Sprinkler Test
  • N N FPP-3.2 3 Monthly Fire Equipment Check
  • N- N FPP-3.24 1 Fire Protection Manifold #6 Sprinkler System N N Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test

Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test

  • FPP-3.25 1 Fire Protection Manifold #5 Sprinkler System N N Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test
  • FPP-3.25 2 Fire Protection Manifold #5 Sprinkler System N N Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test
  • Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test
  • Pagei 17 ,

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chanoe to Section 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT

~

REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. . TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

FPP-3.27 1 Fire Protection Manifold #3 Sprinkler System N N Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test

  • FPP-3.28 1 Sprinkler Nozzle Air Flow Test
  • N N FPP-3.29 1 Fire Protection Manifold #2 Sprinkler System N N Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test
  • FPP-3.3 4 Monthly Hose House Checks * ' N N FPP-3.30 1 Fire Protection Manifold #7 Sprinkler System N N Main Drain and Water Flow Alarm Test
  • FPP-3.38 O Annual Portable Ventilation Fan and N N Equipment Check
  • FPP-3.8 5 Monthly Fire Extinguisher inspection /Non- -1 N Power Block' ..

ISP-76 11 Fire Protection Carbon Dioxide Instrument N N Calibration

  • N N OP-33 27 Fire Protection
  • N N OP-33 28 Fire Protection
  • N N OP-33 29 Fire Protection
  • N N Page 5 of 17

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6 I

PORC RECOMMENDED  ;

CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

OP-33 30 Fire Protection

  • N N OP-33 31 Fire Protection
  • N N RAP-7.1.05D 0 Transfer of Fuel to Alternative Storar,e N N Locations in the Spent Ft,el Foo -

ST-16J1 3 Control Room and Relay Room Emergency N N Lighting Test

  • ST-76A 11 Fire Protection System Weekly Checks
  • N N ST-76AC 3 East Diesel Fire Pump 76P-4 Operational N N i Check *  :

ST-76AG 1 Fire Protection Battery Room Corridor Main N N Drain Test * -

ST-76C 14 West Diesel Fire Pump 76P-1 Operational N N Check

  • ST-76D 17 High Pressure Water and Cardox Fire N N Protection System Valve Position Check
  • ST-76D 18 High Pressure Water and Cardox Fire N N Protection System Valve Position Check' Page 6 of 17

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regarding Preposed Technical Specification Chance to Sec; ion 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (YlN)

ST-76E 9 Monthly and Annual Fire Hose Station N N inspections

  • ST-76E 10 Monthly and Annual Firo Hose Station N N Inspections
  • ST-76E 11 Monthly Fire Hose Station inspections
  • N N ST-76F 0 Fire Hose Station Casket inspection and Hose N N Rerack Test
  • ST-761 16 Monthly Portable Fire Extinguisher inspection N N Procedure
  • ST-761 16 Monthly Portable Fire Extinguisher inspection N N Procedure
  • ST-761 17 Monthly Portable Fire Extinguisher Inspection N N Procedure
  • ST-76J1 7 Heat Detector Functional Test - EDG Building N N Zone 1 (A and C)*  ;

ST-76J1 8 Heat Detector Functional Test - EDG e tilding N N Zone 1 (A and C)*

ST-76J10 13 Heat Detector Functional Tests - HPCI Pump N N ,;

Area

  • Page 7 of 17

.. .~ . ..

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chance to Section C-5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

ST-76J10 14 Heat Detector Functional Tests - HPCI Pump N N Area

  • ST-76J10 15 Heat Detector Functional Tests - HPCI Pump N N Area
  • ST-76J11 12 Heat Detector Functional Tests - RCIC Pump N N Area
  • ST-76J11 13 Heat Detector Functional Tests - RCIC Pump N N Area
  • ST-76J11 14 Heat Detector Functional Tests - RCIC Pump N N Area
  • ST-76J12 9 Heat Detector Functional Test - SGT Filter A* N N

~

ST-76J12 10 Heat Detector Functional Test - SGT Filter A* N N ST-76J13 12 Heat Detector Functional Test - SGT Filter B* N N ST-76J13 13 Heat Detector Functional Test - SGT Filter B* N N ST-76J14 14 Smoke / Heat Detector Functional and CO2 N N Simulated Automatic / Manual Initiation Tests -

North Cable Tunnel

  • e Page 8 of 17

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regardng Proposed Technical Specification Channe to Section 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOmanangDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/NI BENEFIT (Y/N)

ST-76J15 17 Smoke / Heat Detector Functional and CO2 N N.

Simulated Automatic / Manual Initiation Tests -

South Cable Tunnel

  • ST-76J16 15 Smoke / Heat Detector Functional and CO2 N N Simulated Automatic / Manual initiation Tests -

Cable Spreading Room

  • ST-76J17 15 Smoke and Heat Detector Functional Tests N N West Electric Bay
  • ST-76J17 16 Smoke / Heat Detector Functional and CO2 N N Simulated Automatic / Manual Initiation Tests -

West Electric Bay

  • ST-76J18 16 Smoke and Heat Detector Functional Tests - N N East Electric Bay
  • 1 ST-76J18 17 Smoke / Heat Detector Functional and CO2 N N Simulated Automatic / Manual Initiation Tests -

East Electric Bay

  • ST-76J19 14 Smoke / Heat Detector Functional and CO2 N N Simulated Automatic / Manual initiation Tests -

South Emergency Switchgear Room

  • e Page 9 of 17

- - . . . ._ .. - . . - - . ~ _ - . . ..

Attachment 2 '

Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

ST-76J2 5 Heat Detec*or Functional Test - EDG Building N N Zone 2 (B and D)

ST-76J2 6 Heat Detector Functional Test - EDG Building N N i Zone 2 (B and D)*

ST-76J20 13 Smoke-Heat Detector Functional and CO2 N N Simu!cted Automatic / Manual Initiation Tests -

North Emergency Switchgear Room

  • ST-76J21 17 Smoke and Heat Detector Functional Tests - N N Relay Room
  • ST-76J21 18 Smoke and Heat Detector Functional Tests - N N Relay Room' ST-76J22 7 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Diesel Fire N N Pumo Room and Radwaste Sample Sink Area
  • ST-76J25 5 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N 326' - Southwest
  • ST-76J26 8 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N 300' - North
  • ST-76J27 5 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N 326' - North'
  • Page 10 of 17

- - _ . - - - - . . - . .-. - ~ . . . . . . .__- .. - - . . . . .

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6 PORC' RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

ST-76J28 8 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Bu:Iding N N 300' - South

  • ST-76J28 9 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N 300' - South
  • ST-76J29 6 Smoke Detecte c unctional Test - Rx Building N N 272'
  • South
  • ST-76J3 11 Ultra Violet Flame and Heat Detector N N Functional Tests - Recirculation System MG Room
  • ST-76J30 S Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N g

272' - East

  • ST-76J31 7 ~ Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N 272' - West
  • ST-76J32 5 Smoke Detector Functional Test - East N N Crescent
  • ST-76J33 5 Smoke Detector Functional Test - West N N Crescent
  • ST-76J33 6 Smoke Detector Functional. Test - West N N

, Crescent *

  • Page 11 of 17

Attachment 2 Response to RAI Regardireg Pemosed Technical Specification Channe to Section 6.S.1.6 I

PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY  ;

PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

ST-76J34 5 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N ST-76J34 6 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N 344' - Southwest

  • ST-76J35 5 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Rx Building N N 344' - North
  • ST-76J36 2 Smoke Detector Functional Test - LPCI Battery N N Rooms
  • ST-76J36 3 Smoke Detector Functioned Test - LPCI Battery N N  ;

Rooms

  • ST-76J4 13 West Cable Tunnel Smoke Detector and N N Sprinkler Test
  • ST-76J4 14 West Cable Tunnel Smoke Detector and N N Sprinkler Test
  • l ST-76J40 5 Smoke Datector Functional Test - Station N N Battery Rooms
  • ST-76J40 6 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Station N N Battery Rooms * ,

ST-76J41 3 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Safety N N ,

Pump Rooms t

Page 12 of 17

. _ _ . _ _ _ . ~ . _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ ___ __ ._

Attachment 2 -

Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Channe to Section 6.5.1.6 l

1 1

pg RECOmanerafDED CHANGES TO ,

DOCUMENT REVISION - W/ SAFETY

^

PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

ST-76J41 4 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Safety N N Pump Rooms

  • ST-76J42 3 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Control N N Room Ventilation Rooms
  • ST-76J44 2 Smoke Detector Functional Test - Control N N Room Vent Exhaust Ducts
  • ST-76J45 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N N Curtain Coundary Number 1
  • ST-76J45 6 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N ,

N Curtain Boundary Number 1

  • ST-76J46 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N N .!

Curtain Boundary Number 2*

ST-76J46 6 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N N Curtain Boundary Number 2*

ST-76J47 4 Heat Detector functional Test - Water Spray N N Curtain Boundary Number 3' ST-76J47 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N N Curtain Boundary Number 3*

Page 13 of 17 9

l Attachment 2 l Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N) A ST-76J48 4 Heat Detector functional Test - Water Spray N N Curtain Boundary Number 4' ,

ST-76J48 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N N Curtain Boundary Number 4' ,

ST-76J49 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N N '

Curtain Boundary Number 5*

ST-76J49 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Stairwell N N  !

Water Spray Boundary Number 5' i

ST-76J5 11 East Cable Tunnel Smoke Detector and N N Sprinkler Test

  • ST-76J5 12 East Cable Tunnel Smoke Detector and N N Sprinkler Test * -

ST-76J50 4 Heat Detector Functional Test - Water Spray N N Curtain Boundary Number 6 and 8' ST-76J50 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Stairwell N N Water Spray Boundaries Numbers 6 and 8*

ST-76JS1 4 Heat De*ector Functional Test - Water Spray N N

  • Curtain Boundary Number 7*
  • i Page 14 of 17 d

Attachment 2 Response to RAI'tegarding Proposed Technical Specification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6 l

l l .

PORC RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DOCUMENT j REVISION W/ SAFETY PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

ST-76J51 5 Heat Detector Functional Test - Stairwell N N Water Spray Boundary Number 7*

ST-76M 4 Nozzle Air Flow Test for Standby Gas N N Treatment System

  • N N

( ST-76TD 10 Transformer 71T-3 Deluge Operability Test

  • N N l

ST-76TE 9 Transformer 71T-4 Deluge Operability Test

  • N N ST-76U 6 Fire System Flow Test
  • N N ST-76Y 13 Fire Door inspection and Operability Test N N ST-76Z 11 Fire Barrier Penetration Inspection and Damper N N Operability Surveillance Test
  • i TOP-149 Withdrawal East Loop High Pressure Water Fire Protection N N System Flush
  • WACP-10.1.33 5 Hot Work Permits
  • N N e

JAF-RAS-96-OO2 O Fire Suppression Effects Analysis Deficiencies N/A N Page 15 of 17

_ . _ . _ _ . . _ _ , . . . _ . _ . _ . . . . . - _ _ . _ ~ _ _ . __ __ ._ . . _ . _ .._._..._...__.__.._.___._.m.,__ . _ _ _ _ _ . ._ ..

Attachment 2 ,

Response to RAI Regarding Proposed Technical Specif;cE;esi Channe to Section 6.5.1.6 i

i PORC RECORGAENDED CHANGES TO -

N I REVISION W/ SAFETY ,

PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (YM BENEFIT (Y/N) [

JAF-RAS-96-OO2 1 Fire Suppression Effects Analysis Deficiencies N/A N l

JAF-RPT-FPS-02367 1 Fire Protection Plan N/A N i JAF-RPT-FPS-02367 2 Fire Protection Plan N/A N  !

i JAF-SE-94-071 1 FSAR Change Request for Storage of QA .N/A N j

! Records  !

JAF-SE-94-108 1 Fire Barrier Penetration Seals, Fire Dampers, N/A N and Fire Doors, AP-01.04 Changes JAF-SE-94-108 2 Fire Barrier Penetration Sesis, Fire Dampers, N/A N  ;

and Fire Doors JAF-SE-94-132 1 Restoration of the Relay Room System to N/A N .

Normal Mode i JAF-SE-95-045 0 UFSAR Change, Section 9.8.3.9, Drains and N/A N! j Curbs for Fire Protection Water Systems JAF-SE-95-046 1 AP-01.04, Attachment 2 Fire Protection N/A N

  • Changes  !

l JAF-SE-95-046 2 AP-01.04, Attachment 2, Fire Protection N/A N j Changes  :

i

  • i Page 16 of 17

.. o l

l Attachment 2 ~

l Response to RAI Regarding Proposed '

Technical Specification Chance to Section 6.5.1.6 PORC RECOMMENDED ,

CHANGES TO DOCUMENT REVISION W/ SAFETY j PROCEDURE NO. NO. TITLE NSE REQUIRED (Y/N) BENEFIT (Y/N)

JAF-SE-95-067 O Revise Inventory and Extend inspection -N/A N  ;

intervals for Exterior Hose Houses and Curb i Valves JAF-SE-96-049 O AP-14.01 and Fire Protection Plan N/A N JAF-SE-96-049 1 AP-14.01 Revision of FSAR Section 9.8.5 & N/A N ,

13.2.1 and Revision to the Fire Protection Plan  !

^

JAF-SE-96-049 2 AP-14.01 Revision to FSAR Section 9.8.5 & N/A N 13.2.1 and Revision to the Fire Protection Plan -

l t

P b

o;

+

Page 17 of 17 i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=JAFP-97-0325,_Forwards_Response_to_Recent_Request_for_Addl_Info_Pertaining_to_Proposed_TS_Amend_to_Delete_Requirements_for_Plant_PORC_to_Review_Fire_Protection_Program_%26_Implementing_Procedures&oldid=3339377"