Information Notice 2007-38, Ensuring Complete and Accurate Information in the Documentation of Training and Experience for Individuals Seeking Medical Authorization Under the Alternate Pathway

From kanterella
(Redirected from Information Notice 2007-38)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ensuring Complete and Accurate Information in the Documentation of Training and Experience for Individuals Seeking Medical Authorization Under the Alternate Pathway
ML072270127
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/14/2007
From: Schlueter J
NRC/FSME/DMSSA
To:
References
IN-07-038
Download: ML072270127 (6)


ML072270127

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF FEDERAL AND STATE MATERIALS

AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001

December 14, 2007

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2007-38:

ENSURING COMPLETE AND ACCURATE

INFORMATION IN THE DOCUMENTATION OF

TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE FOR INDIVIDUALS

SEEKING APPROVAL AS MEDICAL

AUTHORIZED USERS

ADDRESSEES

All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) medical use licensees and NRC master

materials licensees. All Agreement State Radiation Control Program Directors and State Liaison

Officers.

PURPOSE

The NRC is issuing this information notice (IN) to inform addressees of the importance of

verifying the completeness and accuracy of information provided by individuals seeking

authorization for medical use from the NRC under the alternate pathway. Approval under the

alternate pathway is based on an evaluation of an individual=s training and experience against

the requirements specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 35, Medical Use

of Byproduct Material, (10 CFR Part 35) for the particular authorization being sought.

Recipients should review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the information provided in support

of individuals seeking authorization under the alternate pathway. However, suggestions

contained in this IN are not new NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written

response is required. The NRC is providing this IN to the Agreement States for their information

and for distribution to their medical licensees as appropriate.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

Recently, NRC has identified several instances where licensees have provided documentation

of training and experience for proposed authorized individuals (i.e., physician authorized users

(AUs) or authorized medical physicists (AMPs)) that contained false or inaccurate information.

In each case, the proposed authorized individuals sought authorization by the alternate pathway.

In the first case, a licensee submitted an amendment request to add a number of medical

physicists to its license as AMPs and included a preceptor statement for a Junior Medical

Physicist who was seeking authorization under the alternate pathway. An AMP who was listed

on the licensee=s license completed the Junior Physicist=s preceptor statement. Based on an

investigation by the NRC Office of Investigations (OI), the NRC determined that the preceptor

statement was inaccurate in that it documented dates of clinical training that exceeded the dates

of actual training received by the Junior Medical Physicist. The NRC concluded that the actions

of the preceptor AMP were deliberate, in that he knew that the preceptor statement was

inaccurate at the time it was submitted to the licensee and then subsequently to the NRC. The

IN-2007-38 licensee is responsible for the acts and omissions of its employees and contractors and their

employees, and thus the agency determined that the submission of the inaccurate information

by the licensee to the NRC was a deliberate violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a). This section of the

regulations requires, in part, that information provided to the Commission by a licensee or an

applicant for a license shall be complete and accurate in all material respects. As a result, the

NRC cited the licensee for a Severity Level III violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a) and levied a civil

penalty of $3,250.00. Severity Level III violations are causes for significant regulatory concern.

Furthermore, the NRC determined that the AMP, who was a contractor or employee of the

licensee, deliberately provided inaccurate information to the licensee that caused the licensee to

violate NRC regulations. Therefore, the agency issued the AMP a Severity Level III Notice of

Violation for violation of 10 CFR 30.10, ADeliberate misconduct.@ This regulation requires, in

part, that an employee, contractor (including a consultant or supplier), or subcontractor of a

licensee or applicant for a license may not engage in deliberate misconduct that causes a

licensee or applicant for a license to violate any requirement, and may not deliberately submit to

the NRC, the licensee, or the license applicant, information that the person submitting the

information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC.

In the second case, involving the same AMP and Junior Medical Physicist and the same

inaccurate preceptor statement, a different licensee submitted an amendment request to add the

Junior Medical Physicist to its license. However, in this case, before submitting the amendment

request to the NRC, the licensee=s Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) conducted interviews with the

AMP and the Junior Medical Physicist in an attempt to verify the accuracy of the information

contained in the preceptor statement. Both the AMP and the Junior Medical Physicist informed

the RSO that the information in the preceptor statement was accurate. The licensee

subsequently submitted the amendment request with the inaccurate preceptor statement. As in

the first case, the NRC concluded that the actions of the AMP and the Junior Medical Physicist

were deliberate. However, because the licensee=s RSO did attempt to verify the accuracy of the

information contained in the preceptor statement by interviewing both individuals, before

submitting it to the NRC, the agency classified the violation of 10 CFR 30.9(a) as a Severity

Level IV violation and did not propose a civil penalty. Severity Level IV violations are less

significant than Severity Level III violations. The NRC determined that the AMP and the Junior

Medical Physicist, who were both contractors or employees of a licensee, deliberately provided

materially inaccurate information to the licensee and caused the licensee to violate 10 CFR

30.9(a). The AMP and the Junior Physicist both received Severity Level III Notices of Violation

for violation of 10 CFR 30.10.

In the third case, a diagnostic nuclear medicine licensee provided a proposed AU with a copy of

a sample preceptor letter that contained blank spaces to be completed by the proposed AU and

a preceptor AU. The blank spaces were for the documentation of the number of hours of

supervised clinical and work experience in diagnostic nuclear medicine received by the

proposed AU and for the signature of the supervising preceptor AU. The blank spaces of the

preceptor letter were filled in, the letter was signed by the preceptor AU and the proposed AU,

and the letter was returned to the licensee. The licensee did not question the authenticity or

accuracy of the number of hours of supervised clinical and work experience identified in the

preceptor letter. The licensee submitted a license amendment application to add the proposed

AU to its license and included the preceptor letter as supporting documentation. The NRC

approved the amendment and added the physician to the license as an AU. However, based on

an OI investigation, the NRC determined that the preceptor letter was materially inaccurate.

Specifically, the preceptor admitted to signing the letter without reading the details and

acknowledged that the number of hours of supervised clinical work experience was inaccurate.

As a result, the AU was subsequently removed from the license. The NRC issued separate

IN-2007-38 Severity Level III Notices of Violation to the licensee and proposed AU for having violated 10

CFR 30.9(a).

DISCUSSION

In the first and third cases described above, the licensees did not fulfill their responsibility to take

reasonable steps to verify that the proposed AU or AMP had actually received the training and

experience claimed before submitting their license amendment applications to the NRC. NRC

regulations in 10 CFR 30.9(a) require, in part, that information provided to the Commission by a

licensee or applicant for a license shall be complete and accurate in all material respects. It is

the licensee=s and applicant=s responsibility to ensure the completeness and accuracy of all

information it provides to the NRC. Licensees and applicants for a license should consider

contacting preceptors as well as training program directors and continuing medical education

providers to verify that the training and experience submitted by proposed individuals (i.e., AUs, AMPs, authorized nuclear pharmacists and radiation safety officers) is accurate and

commensurate with the training and experience required by the applicable sections of 10 CFR

Part 35.

Whether or not a licensee is aware of the incompleteness or inaccuracy of the information it

submits to the NRC, a violation of 10 CFR 30.9, ACompleteness and accuracy of information,@

occurs when inaccurate or incomplete information is submitted because licensees are

responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the information they submit to the NRC. In

addition, if the licensee willfully submits inaccurate or incomplete information to the NRC, or if

inaccurate or incomplete information submitted to the NRC is determined to have been willfully

supplied to the licensee by an employee, contractor, consultant, supplier, or subcontractor of the

licensee, the licensee=s violation of 10 CFR 30.9 may also be considered willful as the licensee

is responsible for the conduct of its agents. Such violations will result in the consideration of

escalated enforcement action against the licensee, including possible civil penalties. In addition, individuals who deliberately provide materially incomplete or inaccurate information to licensees

or applicants for a license in connection with a submission to the NRC may be subject to NRC

enforcement action under 10 CFR 30.10 and to criminal prosecution.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions about the

information in this notice, please contact the technical contact below, or the appropriate regional

office.

/RA/

Janet R. Schlueter, Director

Division of Materials Safety

and State Agreements

Office of Federal and State Materials

and Environmental Management Programs

Technical Contact:

Tara Weidner, RI

(610) 337-5272 E-mail: tlw@nrc.gov

Enclosure:

ARecently Issued FSME/NMSS Generic Communications@

IN-2007-38 Severity Level III Notices of Violation to the licensee and proposed AU for having violated 10 CFR 30.9(a).

DISCUSSION

In the first and third cases described above, the licensees did not fulfill their responsibility to take

reasonable steps to verify that the proposed AU or AMP had actually received the training and experience

claimed before submitting their license amendment applications to the NRC. NRC regulations in 10 CFR

30.9(a) require, in part, that information provided to the Commission by a licensee or applicant for a

license shall be complete and accurate in all material respects. It is the licensee=s and applicant=s

responsibility to ensure the completeness and accuracy of all information it provides to the NRC.

Licensees and applicants for a license should consider contacting preceptors as well as training program

directors and continuing medical education providers to verify that the training and experience submitted

by proposed individuals (i.e., AUs, AMPs, authorized nuclear pharmacists and radiation safety officers) is

accurate and commensurate with the training and experience required by the applicable sections of 10

CFR Part 35.

Whether or not a licensee is aware of the incompleteness or inaccuracy of the information it submits to the

NRC, a violation of 10 CFR 30.9, ACompleteness and accuracy of information,@ occurs when inaccurate or

incomplete information is submitted because licensees are responsible for the completeness and

accuracy of the information they submit to the NRC. In addition, if the licensee willfully submits inaccurate

or incomplete information to the NRC, or if inaccurate or incomplete information submitted to the NRC is

determined to have been willfully supplied to the licensee by an employee, contractor, consultant, supplier, or subcontractor of the licensee, the licensee=s violation of 10 CFR 30.9 may also be considered willful as

the licensee is responsible for the conduct of its agents. Such violations will result in the consideration of

escalated enforcement action against the licensee, including possible civil penalties. In addition, individuals who deliberately provide materially incomplete or inaccurate information to licensees or

applicants for a license in connection with a submission to the NRC may be subject to NRC enforcement

action under 10 CFR 30.10 and to criminal prosecution.

CONTACT

This IN requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions about the information in

this notice, please contact the technical contact below, or the appropriate regional office.

Janet R. Schlueter, Director

Division of Materials Safety

and State Agreements

Office of Federal and State Materials

and Environmental Management Programs

Technical Contact:

Tara Weidner, RI

(610) 337-5272 E-mail: tlw@nrc.gov

Enclosure:

ARecently Issued FSME/NMSS Generic Communications@

ML072270127

OFFICE

DNMS

DNMS

DNMS

RI/ORA

RI/OI

NAME

TWeidner

PHenderson

BHolian

DHolody

EWilson

DATE

OFFICE

RI/RC

FSME/DMSSA

FSME/DMSSA

OE

OGC

FSME/DMSSA

NAME

KFarrar

CFlannery

SWastler

NHiltion for

C.CarpenterB

concurrence with

FCameron

JSchlueter

DATE

8/13/07

08/14/07

10/26/07

12/11/07

12/14/07

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Enclosure

IN-2007-38 Recently Issued FSME/NMSS Generic Communications

Date

GC No.

Subject

Addressees

02/02/07

IN-07-03

Reportable Medical Events

Involving Patients Receiving

Dosages of Sodium

Iodide Iodine-131 Less Than the

Prescribed Dosage Because of

Capsules Remaining in Vials after

Administration

All NRC medical use licensees and NRC

master materials licensees. All

Agreement State Radiation Control

Program Directors and State Liaison

Officers.

02/28/07

IN-07-08

Potential Vulnerabilities of Time- Reliant Computer-Based Systems

Due to Change in Daylight Saving

Time Dates

All NRC licensees and all Agreement

State Radiation Control Program

Directors and State Liaison Officers.

03/13/07

IN-07-10

Yttrium-90 Theraspheres and

Sirspheres Impurities

All NRC medical licensees and NRC

master materials licensees. All

Agreement State Radiation Control

Program Directors and State Liaison

Officers.

04/04/07

IN-07-13

Use of As-Found Conditions To

Evaluate Criticality-Related

Process Upsets at Fuel Cycle

Facilities

All licensees authorized to possess a

critical mass of special nuclear material.

05/02/07

IN-07-16

Common Violations of the

Increased Controls Requirements

and Related Guidance Documents

All licensees who are implementing the

NRC order imposing increased controls

(EA-05-090), issued November 14, 2005, and December 22, 2005.

07/19/07

IN-07-25

Suggestions from the Advisory

Committee on the Medical Use of

Isotopes for Consideration To

Improve Compliance with Sodium

Iodide I-131 Written Directive

Requirements in 10 CFR 35.40

and Supervision Requirements in

10 CFR 35.27

All NRC medical use licensees and NRC

master materials licensees. All

Agreement State Radiation Control

Program Directors and State Liaison

Officers.

10/17/07

IN-07-35

Varian Medical Systems

Varisource HDR Events: Iridium-

192 Source Pulled From Shielded

Position

All NRC medical use licensees and NRC

master materials licensees authorized to

possess or use a Varian Medical

Systems VariSource High Dose Rate

Remote Afterloader. All Agreement State

Radiation Control Program Directors and

State Liaison Officers

03/01/07

RIS-07-03

Ionizing Radiation Warning

Symbol

All NRC licensees and certificate holders.

All Radiation Control Program Directors

and State Liaison Officers.

03/09/07

RIS-07-04

Personally Identifiable Information

Submitted to the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission

All holders of operating licenses for

nuclear power reactors and holders of

and applicants for certificates for reactor

designs. All licensees, certificate

holders, applicants, and other entities

subject to regulation by the NRC for the

use of source, byproduct, and special

nuclear material.

Enclosure

IN-2007-38 Date

GC No.

Subject

Addressees

03/20/07

RIS-07-05

Status and Plans for

Implementation of NRC Regulatory

Authority for Certain Naturally

Occurring and Accelerator- Produced Radioactive Material

All NRC materials licensees, Radiation

Control Program Directors, State Liaison

Officers, and NRC=s Advisory Committee

on the Medical Uses of Isotopes.

04/05/07

RIS-07-07

Clarification of Increased Controls

for Licensees That Possess

Collocated Radioactive Material

During Transportation Activities

All NRC licensees issued the NRC=s

order imposing increased controls and all

Radiation Control Program Directors and

State Liaison Officers.

05/15/07

RIS-07-10

Subscriptions to New List Server

for Automatic Notifications of

Medical-Related Generic

Communications, Federal Register

Notices and Newsletters

All NRC medical-use licensees and NRC

medical use licensees and NRC master

materials licensees. All Radiation Control

Program Directors and State Liaison

Officers.

06/27/07

RIS-06-27, Suppl. 1

Availability of NRC 313A Series of

Forms and Guidance for Their

Completion

All NRC medical use licensees, commercial nuclear pharmacy licensees, and NRC master materials licensees. All

Radiation Control Program Directors and

State Liaison Officers.

08/31/07

RIS-07-13

Verification of the Authenticity of

Materials Possession Licenses

All NRC materials licensees. All

Agreement State Radiation Control

Program Directors and State Liaison

Officers.

06/05/07

RIS-07-14

NRC Regulatory Issue Summary

2007-14 Fingerprinting

Requirements for Licensees

Implementing the Increased

Control Order

All NRC licensees that have received the

Increased Controls (IC) requirements. All

Agreement State Radiation Control

Program Directors and State Liaison

Officers.

06/05/07

RIS-07-15

NRC Regulatory Issue Summary

2007-15 Unescorted Access to

Materials for Non-Manufacturer

and Distributor Service Providers

All NRC licensees that are non- manufacturer and distributor (non-M&D)

service providers. All Agreement State

Radiation Control Program Directors and

State Liaison Officers.

10/04/07

RIS-07-22

Status Update for Implementation

of NRC Regulatory Authority for

Certain naturally-Occurring and

Accelerator-Produced Radioactive

Material

All NRC materials licensees, radiation

control program directors, State liaison

officers, and the NRCs Advisory

Committee on the Medical Uses of

Isotopes.

10/04/07

RIS-07-23

Date for Operation of National

Source Tracking System

All licensees authorized to possess

Category 1 or Category 2 quantities of

radioactive materials. All Radiation

Control Program Directors and State

Liaison Officers.

Note: A full listing of generic communications may be viewed at the NRC public Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-com.