IR 05000482/1982021

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Mgt Meeting Rept 50-482/82-21 on 811019.No Noncompliance Noted.Comments on Evaluation Should Be Submitted within 20 Days of Ltr Date
ML20058B201
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/10/1982
From: Seidle W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Koester G
KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20058B195 List:
References
NUDOCS 8207230187
Download: ML20058B201 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ - __ _ _ _.

em . , May 10, 1982 Docket: STN 50-482/81-21 . Kansas Gas and Electric Company ATTN: Mr. Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear . Post Office Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 .- . , Gentlemen: This refers to the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Board Report of the Wolf Creek facility, Unit 1. Construction Permit CPPR-147. The SALP Board met on September 18,1981, to evaluate the performance of the subject facility for the period July 1,1980, through June 30, 1981. The per-formance analyses and resulting evaluation are documented in the enclosed SALP Board Report. These analyses and the evaluation were discussed with you at your offices in Wichita Kansas, on October 19, 1981.

The performance of your facility was evaluated in the following functional areas: Containment and other Safety-Related Structures; Piping Systems and Supports; Safety-Related Components; Support Systems; Electrical Power Supply and Distribution; and Licensirg Activities.

The SALP Board evaluation process consists of categorizing perfomance in each functional area. The categories which we have used to evaluate the performance of your facility are defined in Section II of the enclosed SALP Board Report.

As you are aware, the NRC has changed the policy for the conduct of the SALP program based on our experiences and the recently implemented reorganization which emphasized the regionalization of the NRC staff. This report is con-sistent with the revised policy.

Any connents which you may have concerning our evaluation of the perfomance of your facility should be submitted to this office within 20 days of the date of this letter. Your comments, if any, and the SALP Board Report will both appear as enclosures to the Region IV Administrator's letter which issues the SALP Report as an NRC Report. In addition to the issuance of the report, this letter will, if appropriate, state the NRC position on matters relating to the status of your safety programs.

8207230187 820625 PDR ADOCK 05000482 G PDR E ,. vt w

  • "a d....RPS..C.......

.... RPS.-fff[[..I.RPS-B.. ...RPB.1 N T... .RPB 2....., .DRRP&EP 1- - l TEVAndel/ h REHall WAcrossman GLMa sen WCSeidla JEGagli o 'J~ ' " 7p782 .f,.... 58782 - "STf 782- " ""57 /82 " " '571 782- - 57/d ~ llins , ,,,,, p ... gj 3j g... .....

  • * * *

............. ............... .-...~. ~.... - -...- -. - - '"- -' .. une ronu 24 i#se ecu ono (BDMCMLEECORD COPY __

. Kansas Gas and Electric Cosapany-2-May 10,1982 Comments which you may submit at your option are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. PL %-511.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with you.

,

Sincerely . . " Original Sisned h w.c. scour W. C. Seidle, Chief Reactor Project Branch 2 Enclosure: Appendix - NRC Report STN 50-482/81-21 no DMB distribution made at this time .

  • " ' ' ' >

.................. .............. .............. ....... . ............. ......... . .. '"*"'"'> .............. .......... .................. ... ... ....... ... ... .... DATEk l .......... .. .. .............. ................ .................. ................. ............. " " * ' " " ' ' ' " * ' " " * " " OFFICIAL RECORD COPY _ }}