|
---|
Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000461/19990191999-10-15015 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-19 on 990913-17.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000461/19990141999-10-0101 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-461/99-14 & 50-461/98-12 on 990729-0908.Two Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-13 on 990611-0728.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990101999-07-16016 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-10 on 990422-0610.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990171999-07-0909 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-17 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Access Authorization Program,Communications,Protected Areas Access Control of Personnel,Packages,Matl & Vehicles & Testing & Maint IR 05000461/19990121999-07-0707 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-12 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Chemistry & Radiation Protection Programs Including Quality Control of Lab & Inline Instrumentation IR 05000461/19990041999-05-0505 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-04 on 990301-0407.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Operators to Safely Operate Facility IR 05000461/19990011999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-01 on 990208-0325.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990111999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-11 on 990408-21.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990031999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-03 on 990208-0318.Eight Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering Organization Effectiveness & Readiness for Restart Through in-depth Review of Calculations IR 05000461/19990061999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-06 on 990217-0407.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000461/19990081999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-08 on 990309-12.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19990071999-04-0101 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-07 on 990301-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Alarm Stations,Protected Area Detection & Assessment Aids IR 05000461/19980291999-03-24024 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-29 on 981214-990217.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Circumstances Surrounding High Number of Licensed Operator Failures That Occurred as Result of 1998 Annual Operator Requalification Exam IR 05000461/19990021999-03-18018 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-02 on 990107-0216.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering, & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990051999-03-10010 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-05 on 990208-12.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program IR 05000461/19980281999-02-0101 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-28 on 981214-18.No Violations Noted. Major Areas inspected:follow-up Review of Licensee Program for Implementating 10CFR50.65,maint,quality Assurance Program & Engineering IR 05000461/19980201999-01-22022 January 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-20 on 981118-990106.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980271998-12-31031 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-27 on 981117-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19980181998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-18 on 981002-1117.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980261998-12-13013 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-26 on 981013-30.Violations Were Identified,But No Notice Was Issued.Major Areas Inspected: Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980191998-11-25025 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-19 on 980914-1009.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000461/19980171998-10-30030 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-17 on 980819-1001.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980241998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-24 on 980921-1001.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Radiological Planning for ECC Suction Strainer Mod IR 05000461/19980251998-10-28028 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-25 on 981005-09.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Portion of EP Program,Review of Documentation,Tours & Observations of Emergency Response Facilities & Equipment & Follow Up on Previous Findings IR 05000461/19980141998-09-17017 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-14 on 980707-0818.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980111998-08-0707 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-11 on 980527-0710.Enforcement Discretion Being Exercised for Six Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980131998-07-0808 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-13 on 980622-25.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program ML20236L3171998-07-0707 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-09 on 980504-08.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Documentation Re Actual EP Activation,Evaluation of Quality of EP Program Related Audits & Reviews & Effectiveness of Mgt Controls IR 05000461/19980081998-06-25025 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-08 on 980414-0528.Enforcement Discretion Has Been Authorized for Listed Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980101998-06-0303 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-10 on 980511-15.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980061998-05-11011 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-06 on 980304-0414.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20217F4611998-04-22022 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-07 on 980323-27.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980031998-03-27027 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-03 on 980123-0303.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980041998-03-20020 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-04 on 980213-16.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Maint ML20202H7541998-02-13013 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/97-25 on 971125-980122.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980021998-02-0202 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-02 on 980105-09.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000461/19970241998-01-0202 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/97-24 on 971201-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Activities.Selective Elements of Access Authorization Program,Security Communication Sys & Testing Were Reviewed & Evaluated IR 05000461/19970231997-12-23023 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-23 on 971103-07.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Findings & Conclusions from Insp of Licensed RO & SRO Requalification Training Programs ML20199A3941997-12-22022 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-22 on 971007-1124.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20198L2741997-12-22022 December 1997 Insp Rept for Clinton Power Station on 970923-1003 & 1020-31.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970181997-11-24024 November 1997 AIT Insp Rept 50-461/97-18 on 970805-18.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Circumstances Surrounding 970805 & 970722 RHR Pump a Circuit Breaker Failures at CPS IR 05000461/19970151997-11-12012 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-15 on 970707-0825.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199A8771997-11-12012 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-19 on 970826-1006.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engneering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970141997-10-14014 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-14 on 970524-0707.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970201997-10-11011 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-20 on 970707-0829.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering & Maint IR 05000461/19970071997-09-29029 September 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-07 on 970313-0522.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations & Surveillance Testing IR 05000461/19970171997-08-25025 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-17 on 970714-18 & 27-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Gaseous & Liquid Radwaste Programs Including Effluent Releases & Monitoring ML20151K0191997-07-25025 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-11 on 970407-0523.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20149J5211997-07-15015 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-12 on 961209-970703.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Specific Commitments Licensee Made in Response to Confirmatory Action Ltrs Associated w/960905 Reactor Recirculation Pump Seal Failure 1999-08-19
[Table view] Category:NRC-GENERATED
MONTHYEARIR 05000461/19990191999-10-15015 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-19 on 990913-17.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000461/19990141999-10-0101 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-461/99-14 & 50-461/98-12 on 990729-0908.Two Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-13 on 990611-0728.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990101999-07-16016 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-10 on 990422-0610.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990171999-07-0909 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-17 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Access Authorization Program,Communications,Protected Areas Access Control of Personnel,Packages,Matl & Vehicles & Testing & Maint IR 05000461/19990121999-07-0707 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-12 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Chemistry & Radiation Protection Programs Including Quality Control of Lab & Inline Instrumentation IR 05000461/19990041999-05-0505 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-04 on 990301-0407.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Operators to Safely Operate Facility IR 05000461/19990011999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-01 on 990208-0325.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990111999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-11 on 990408-21.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990031999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-03 on 990208-0318.Eight Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering Organization Effectiveness & Readiness for Restart Through in-depth Review of Calculations IR 05000461/19990061999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-06 on 990217-0407.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000461/19990081999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-08 on 990309-12.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19990071999-04-0101 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-07 on 990301-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Alarm Stations,Protected Area Detection & Assessment Aids IR 05000461/19980291999-03-24024 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-29 on 981214-990217.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Circumstances Surrounding High Number of Licensed Operator Failures That Occurred as Result of 1998 Annual Operator Requalification Exam IR 05000461/19990021999-03-18018 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-02 on 990107-0216.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering, & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990051999-03-10010 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-05 on 990208-12.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program IR 05000461/19980281999-02-0101 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-28 on 981214-18.No Violations Noted. Major Areas inspected:follow-up Review of Licensee Program for Implementating 10CFR50.65,maint,quality Assurance Program & Engineering IR 05000461/19980201999-01-22022 January 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-20 on 981118-990106.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980271998-12-31031 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-27 on 981117-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19980181998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-18 on 981002-1117.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980261998-12-13013 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-26 on 981013-30.Violations Were Identified,But No Notice Was Issued.Major Areas Inspected: Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980191998-11-25025 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-19 on 980914-1009.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000461/19980171998-10-30030 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-17 on 980819-1001.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980241998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-24 on 980921-1001.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Radiological Planning for ECC Suction Strainer Mod IR 05000461/19980251998-10-28028 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-25 on 981005-09.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Portion of EP Program,Review of Documentation,Tours & Observations of Emergency Response Facilities & Equipment & Follow Up on Previous Findings IR 05000461/19980141998-09-17017 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-14 on 980707-0818.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980111998-08-0707 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-11 on 980527-0710.Enforcement Discretion Being Exercised for Six Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980131998-07-0808 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-13 on 980622-25.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program ML20236L3171998-07-0707 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-09 on 980504-08.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Documentation Re Actual EP Activation,Evaluation of Quality of EP Program Related Audits & Reviews & Effectiveness of Mgt Controls IR 05000461/19980081998-06-25025 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-08 on 980414-0528.Enforcement Discretion Has Been Authorized for Listed Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980101998-06-0303 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-10 on 980511-15.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980061998-05-11011 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-06 on 980304-0414.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20217F4611998-04-22022 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-07 on 980323-27.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980031998-03-27027 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-03 on 980123-0303.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980041998-03-20020 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-04 on 980213-16.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Maint ML20202H7541998-02-13013 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/97-25 on 971125-980122.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980021998-02-0202 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-02 on 980105-09.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000461/19970241998-01-0202 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/97-24 on 971201-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Activities.Selective Elements of Access Authorization Program,Security Communication Sys & Testing Were Reviewed & Evaluated IR 05000461/19970231997-12-23023 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-23 on 971103-07.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Findings & Conclusions from Insp of Licensed RO & SRO Requalification Training Programs ML20199A3941997-12-22022 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-22 on 971007-1124.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20198L2741997-12-22022 December 1997 Insp Rept for Clinton Power Station on 970923-1003 & 1020-31.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970181997-11-24024 November 1997 AIT Insp Rept 50-461/97-18 on 970805-18.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Circumstances Surrounding 970805 & 970722 RHR Pump a Circuit Breaker Failures at CPS IR 05000461/19970151997-11-12012 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-15 on 970707-0825.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199A8771997-11-12012 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-19 on 970826-1006.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engneering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970141997-10-14014 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-14 on 970524-0707.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970201997-10-11011 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-20 on 970707-0829.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering & Maint IR 05000461/19970071997-09-29029 September 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-07 on 970313-0522.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations & Surveillance Testing IR 05000461/19970171997-08-25025 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-17 on 970714-18 & 27-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Gaseous & Liquid Radwaste Programs Including Effluent Releases & Monitoring ML20151K0191997-07-25025 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-11 on 970407-0523.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20149J5211997-07-15015 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-12 on 961209-970703.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Specific Commitments Licensee Made in Response to Confirmatory Action Ltrs Associated w/960905 Reactor Recirculation Pump Seal Failure 1999-08-19
[Table view] Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000461/19990191999-10-15015 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-19 on 990913-17.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000461/19990141999-10-0101 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-461/99-14 & 50-461/98-12 on 990729-0908.Two Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-13 on 990611-0728.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990101999-07-16016 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-10 on 990422-0610.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990171999-07-0909 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-17 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Access Authorization Program,Communications,Protected Areas Access Control of Personnel,Packages,Matl & Vehicles & Testing & Maint IR 05000461/19990121999-07-0707 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-12 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Chemistry & Radiation Protection Programs Including Quality Control of Lab & Inline Instrumentation IR 05000461/19990041999-05-0505 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-04 on 990301-0407.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Operators to Safely Operate Facility IR 05000461/19990011999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-01 on 990208-0325.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990111999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-11 on 990408-21.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990031999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-03 on 990208-0318.Eight Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering Organization Effectiveness & Readiness for Restart Through in-depth Review of Calculations IR 05000461/19990061999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-06 on 990217-0407.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000461/19990081999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-08 on 990309-12.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19990071999-04-0101 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-07 on 990301-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Alarm Stations,Protected Area Detection & Assessment Aids IR 05000461/19980291999-03-24024 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-29 on 981214-990217.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Circumstances Surrounding High Number of Licensed Operator Failures That Occurred as Result of 1998 Annual Operator Requalification Exam IR 05000461/19990021999-03-18018 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-02 on 990107-0216.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering, & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990051999-03-10010 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-05 on 990208-12.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program IR 05000461/19980281999-02-0101 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-28 on 981214-18.No Violations Noted. Major Areas inspected:follow-up Review of Licensee Program for Implementating 10CFR50.65,maint,quality Assurance Program & Engineering IR 05000461/19980201999-01-22022 January 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-20 on 981118-990106.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980271998-12-31031 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-27 on 981117-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19980181998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-18 on 981002-1117.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980261998-12-13013 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-26 on 981013-30.Violations Were Identified,But No Notice Was Issued.Major Areas Inspected: Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980191998-11-25025 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-19 on 980914-1009.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000461/19980171998-10-30030 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-17 on 980819-1001.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980241998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-24 on 980921-1001.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Radiological Planning for ECC Suction Strainer Mod IR 05000461/19980251998-10-28028 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-25 on 981005-09.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Portion of EP Program,Review of Documentation,Tours & Observations of Emergency Response Facilities & Equipment & Follow Up on Previous Findings IR 05000461/19980141998-09-17017 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-14 on 980707-0818.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980111998-08-0707 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-11 on 980527-0710.Enforcement Discretion Being Exercised for Six Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980131998-07-0808 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-13 on 980622-25.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program ML20236L3171998-07-0707 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-09 on 980504-08.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Documentation Re Actual EP Activation,Evaluation of Quality of EP Program Related Audits & Reviews & Effectiveness of Mgt Controls IR 05000461/19980081998-06-25025 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-08 on 980414-0528.Enforcement Discretion Has Been Authorized for Listed Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980101998-06-0303 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-10 on 980511-15.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980061998-05-11011 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-06 on 980304-0414.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20217F4611998-04-22022 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-07 on 980323-27.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980031998-03-27027 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-03 on 980123-0303.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980041998-03-20020 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-04 on 980213-16.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Maint ML20202H7541998-02-13013 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/97-25 on 971125-980122.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980021998-02-0202 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-02 on 980105-09.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000461/19970241998-01-0202 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/97-24 on 971201-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Activities.Selective Elements of Access Authorization Program,Security Communication Sys & Testing Were Reviewed & Evaluated IR 05000461/19970231997-12-23023 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-23 on 971103-07.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Findings & Conclusions from Insp of Licensed RO & SRO Requalification Training Programs ML20199A3941997-12-22022 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-22 on 971007-1124.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20198L2741997-12-22022 December 1997 Insp Rept for Clinton Power Station on 970923-1003 & 1020-31.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970181997-11-24024 November 1997 AIT Insp Rept 50-461/97-18 on 970805-18.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Circumstances Surrounding 970805 & 970722 RHR Pump a Circuit Breaker Failures at CPS IR 05000461/19970151997-11-12012 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-15 on 970707-0825.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199A8771997-11-12012 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-19 on 970826-1006.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engneering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970141997-10-14014 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-14 on 970524-0707.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19970201997-10-11011 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-20 on 970707-0829.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering & Maint IR 05000461/19970071997-09-29029 September 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-07 on 970313-0522.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations & Surveillance Testing IR 05000461/19970171997-08-25025 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-17 on 970714-18 & 27-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Gaseous & Liquid Radwaste Programs Including Effluent Releases & Monitoring ML20151K0191997-07-25025 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-11 on 970407-0523.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20149J5211997-07-15015 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-461/97-12 on 961209-970703.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Specific Commitments Licensee Made in Response to Confirmatory Action Ltrs Associated w/960905 Reactor Recirculation Pump Seal Failure 1999-08-19
[Table view] Category:UTILITY
MONTHYEARIR 05000461/19900221990-11-0202 November 1990 Insp Rept 50-461/90-22 on 901015-19.Violation Noted But Not Cited.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program During Refueling/Maint Outage ML20058A7541990-10-18018 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-461/90-20 on 900924-28.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Chemistry Program,Including Procedures,Organization & Training,Reactor Sys Water QC Programs & QA & QC Programs in Labs IR 05000461/19900151990-08-0303 August 1990 Insp Rept 50-461/90-15 on 900723-27.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise Involving Followup on Licensee Actions on Previously Identified Items IR 05000461/19900111990-07-25025 July 1990 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/90-11 on 900512-0703.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Operational Safety,Event Followup,Radiological Controls,Maint/Surveillance,Lers,Tmi Items & Meetings IR 05000461/19890281989-10-0404 October 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-28 on 890911-15.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection Program,Including Review of Fire Protection Organization,Administrative Controls & Fire Protection Sys Surveillance Test Program IR 05000461/19890251989-08-18018 August 1989 Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp & Allegation Review Rept 50-461/89-25 on 890717-0802 (Ref 10CFR 73.21). Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Program Mgt Effectiveness & Review of Allegations IR 05000461/19890241989-08-17017 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-461/89-24 on 890801-04.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protecction,Radwaste & Transportation Programs Including,Aspects of Licensee Operational Radiation Protection IR 05000461/19890221989-07-27027 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-22 on 890619-0721.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Startup Testing Activities Subsequent to Initial Refueling Outage,Areas of Core Performance & Nuclear Engineering IR 05000461/19890181989-07-18018 July 1989 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/89-18 on 890512-0707.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previous Insp Findings,Onsite Followup of Written Repts,Allegation Followup,Operational Safety Verification & Monthly Maint Observation IR 05000461/19890211989-07-14014 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-21 on 890601-23.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Failure of Reactor Recirculation Pump B Seals & Subsequent Equipment Problems Which Occurred on 890601.Several Weaknesses Identified IR 05000461/19890201989-07-12012 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-20 on 890627-29.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise & Evaluation of 890601 Emergency Plan Activation IR 05000461/19890191989-06-23023 June 1989 Partially Withheld Safeguards Insp Rept 50-461/89-19 on 890206 & 0522-0607 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Protected & Vital Area Barriers, Access Control - Personnel,Packages & Vehicles & Testing IR 05000461/19890231989-06-21021 June 1989 Enforcement Conference Rept 50-461/89-23 on 890614.Matters Discussed:Apparent Violation of 10CFR50.49,Paragraphs (F) & (G) Re Hydrogen Igniter Field Connections,Instrument Circuits Landed on Terminal Blocks in GE Instrument Racks IR 05000461/19890161989-06-14014 June 1989 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/89-16 on 890227-0303 & 890316-17.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup on Allegation RIII-87-A-0027,involving Containment Integrity & Inservice Testing Program IR 05000461/19890141989-06-0808 June 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-14 on 890316-0530.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings, Regional Request,Nrc Compliance Bulletin & Generic Ltr Followup & Monthly Maint Observation IR 05000461/19890171989-05-19019 May 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-17 on 890403-27.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Field Alterations & Plant Mods & Dedication of commercial-grade Equipment for safety-related Applications IR 05000461/19890031989-05-10010 May 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-03 on 890123-26,0227-28 & 0313-0407. Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint,Support of Maint & Related Mgt Activities IR 05000461/19890121989-04-14014 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-12 on 890301-03 & 31.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Verification That SSER6 Required Remote Shutdown Sys Mods Installed Prior to Startup from First Refueling IR 05000461/19890081989-04-0505 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-08 on 890127-0316.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings, Followup of Info Notices & Regional Requests,Refueling Activities & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000461/19890131989-04-0404 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-13 on 890308-21.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Allegation & Associated Issue Re Staffing Provisions for Emergency Response Organization at Plant IR 05000461/19890051989-04-0303 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-05 on 890119-0323.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Programs,Procedures, Observation of Work Activities,Data Review,Mod Activities & Licensee Action on Info Notice 88-003 IR 05000461/19890151989-03-28028 March 1989 Enforcement Conference Rept 50-461/89-15 on 890321.Matters Discussed:Apparent Violation Re Inadequate Licensee Action to Correct & Prevent Recurrence of Previously Identified Environ Qualification Deficiencies ML20236D6511989-03-16016 March 1989 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/89-06 on 890206-0303.Violation Noted:Failure to Perform Adquate Corrective Action on Kynar Butt Splices & Junction Boxes.Major Areas Inspected:Lers,Reg Guide 1.97 Commitments & Torque Switches IR 05000461/19890041989-03-10010 March 1989 Insp Rept 50-461/89-04 on 890103-06,10-20 & 0224.No Violations Noted.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Issue Involving Senior Manager,Including Adherence W/Licensee Procedures in Determining If Employee Fit IR 05000461/19880301989-02-15015 February 1989 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/88-30 on 881206-890127.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Review of Info Notices & Preparation for Refueling & Refueling Activities IR 05000461/19880251988-10-21021 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-25 on 880926-1014.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Weaknesses Noted Re Training for non-operating Personnel Performing safety-related Activities.Major Areas Inspected:Generic Ltr 83-28 IR 05000461/19880261988-10-19019 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-26 on 880926-30.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protection & Radwaste Mgt Programs,Including Organization & Mgt Controls,Internal Exposure Controls & Control of Radioactive Matls IR 05000461/19880201988-10-18018 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-20 on 880727-28 & 1018.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Followup on Allegation RIII-87-A-0027 IR 05000461/19880241988-10-0606 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-24 on 880114-16 & 19-20.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Chemistry & Environ Radiological Monitoring Programs,Qa Program,Audits & Appraisals & Changes in Organization IR 05000461/19880211988-09-16016 September 1988 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/88-21 on 880810-0906.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Onsite Followup of Written Repts of Nonroutine Events,Operational Safety Verification,Monthly Maint & Surveillance Observation & Training Effectiveness IR 05000461/19880181988-08-30030 August 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-18 on 880707-28 & 0810-17.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Allegations Made by Former Employees of Util Contractor,Employed During Const of Plant, Indicating That Certain Requirements of ASME Code Violated IR 05000461/19880171988-08-11011 August 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-17 on 880712-15.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protection Program & Related Allegations,Including Organization,Mgt Controls & Staffing & External Exposure Controls IR 05000461/19880191988-08-11011 August 1988 Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-461/88-19 on 880725-29 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Effectiveness Security Organization,Records & Repts,Testing & Maint,Keys & Combination & Safeguards Contingency Plan IR 05000461/19880141988-07-29029 July 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-14 on 880518-0706.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Action on Previous findings,10CFR21 Rept Followup,Info Notice Followup,Compliance Bulletin Followup & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000461/19880081988-06-17017 June 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-08 on 880424-28.No Violations, Deficiencies or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Emergency Response Facility Appraisal,Reviews of Radioactive Release Assessment & Meteorological Info IR 05000461/19880091988-06-0808 June 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-09 on 880404-0518.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings & Onsite Followup of Written Repts of Nonroutine Events at Power Reactor Facilities IR 05000461/19880131988-05-31031 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-13 on 880427-29 & 0511-13.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:To Determine Compliance W/Atws Rule,10CFR50.62,per Temporary Instruction 2500/20 (Module 25020) IR 05000461/19870271988-05-27027 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/87-27 on 870810-880429.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup on Allegation RIII-87-A-027 & Licensee Followup Actions to Violations & Unresolved Item Noted in Previous Insps IR 05000461/19880121988-05-18018 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-12 on 880425-27.No Violations, Deficiencies,Deviations,Exercise Weaknesses or Open Items Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Preparedness Exercise of Key Functions & Locations During Exercise IR 05000461/19880071988-05-17017 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-07 on 880321-0415.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Quality Verification Activities,Qc,Operations Surveillance & Conduct of Control Operations IR 05000461/19880041988-04-28028 April 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-04 on 880217-0404.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Nrc Compliance Bulletin Followup,Operational Safety Verification & Training Effectiveness ML20151S9901988-04-21021 April 1988 Partially Withheld Annual Reactive Insp 50-461/88-11 on 880405-08 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violation Noted.Apparent Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Reported Security Event on 880404 IR 05000461/19880061988-04-21021 April 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-06 on 880314-18,28-31 & 0406.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mod Process & Associated Quality Verification Process & Followup of Previous Inspector Identified Problems IR 05000461/19880021988-04-13013 April 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/88-02 on 880115-0406.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Actions on Previously Identified Item & Review of Startup Test Results IR 05000461/19880051988-03-31031 March 1988 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/88-05 on 880224-26.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Solid Radwaste Program Including,Organization & Mgt Controls,Qualifications & Training,Solid Radwaste & Transportation Activities IR 05000461/19880031988-02-26026 February 1988 Safety Insp Rept 50-461/88-03 on 880111-0217.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Info Notice & Generic Ltr Followup,Onsite Followup of Written Repts of Nonroutine Events at Power Reactor Facilities & Operational Safety IR 05000461/19870391988-01-24024 January 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/87-39 on 871125-880111.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Ie Bulletin Followup,Operational Safety Verification,Monthly Maint & Surveillance Observations IR 05000461/19870401988-01-0505 January 1988 Insp Rept 50-461/87-40 on 871208-09 & 16.No Violations, Deficiencies or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Available Facility Space & Layout,Communication & NRC Computer Compatibility IR 05000461/19870351987-12-29029 December 1987 Insp Rept 50-461/87-35 on 871005-1120.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Qa Program Verification,Maint & Followup of Inspector Identified Problems IR 05000461/19870381987-12-22022 December 1987 Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-461/87-38 on 871130-1204 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan/Implementing Procedures, Security Organization & Program Audit & Physical Barriers 1990-08-03
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000461/19990191999-10-15015 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-19 on 990913-17.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000461/19990141999-10-0101 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-461/99-14 & 50-461/98-12 on 990729-0908.Two Violations Occurred & Being Treated as Ncvs.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20217J1361999-09-30030 September 1999 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 971028-980921. Violation Noted:During Jan 1997,QV Dept Discriminated Against Qv Inspector,For Having Engaged in Protected Activities ML20217J1481999-09-30030 September 1999 Notice of Violation from Investigation Conducted from 991028-980921.In Jan 1997,CH Tewksbury Engaged in Deliberate Misconduct That Caused Util to Be in Violation of 10CFR50.7 IR 05000461/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-13 on 990611-0728.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990101999-07-16016 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-10 on 990422-0610.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990171999-07-0909 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-17 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Access Authorization Program,Communications,Protected Areas Access Control of Personnel,Packages,Matl & Vehicles & Testing & Maint IR 05000461/19990121999-07-0707 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-12 on 990607-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of Chemistry & Radiation Protection Programs Including Quality Control of Lab & Inline Instrumentation PNO-III-99-028, on 990506,reactor Achieved Criticality Starting Up from Sept 1995 Outage.Region III Maintained Continuous Insp Coverage Throughout Restart Period.Info in Preliminary Notification Reviewed1999-05-28028 May 1999 PNO-III-99-028:on 990506,reactor Achieved Criticality Starting Up from Sept 1995 Outage.Region III Maintained Continuous Insp Coverage Throughout Restart Period.Info in Preliminary Notification Reviewed IR 05000461/19990041999-05-0505 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-04 on 990301-0407.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Operators to Safely Operate Facility IR 05000461/19990011999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-01 on 990208-0325.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19990111999-04-30030 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-11 on 990408-21.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20206G9821999-04-30030 April 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp on 990408-21.Violation Noted:Licensee,Despite Having Considered Issue Closed in Corrective Action Program,Failed to Correct Condition Adverse to Quality IR 05000461/19990031999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-03 on 990208-0318.Eight Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering Organization Effectiveness & Readiness for Restart Through in-depth Review of Calculations IR 05000461/19990061999-04-21021 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-06 on 990217-0407.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000461/19990081999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-08 on 990309-12.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19990071999-04-0101 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-07 on 990301-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Alarm Stations,Protected Area Detection & Assessment Aids IR 05000461/19980291999-03-24024 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-29 on 981214-990217.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Circumstances Surrounding High Number of Licensed Operator Failures That Occurred as Result of 1998 Annual Operator Requalification Exam IR 05000461/19990021999-03-18018 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-02 on 990107-0216.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering, & Plant Support ML20204E6931999-03-10010 March 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp on 990208-12.Violtion Noted: Licensee Did Not Make Adequate Surveys to Assure Compliance with 10CFR20.1902(b) Requiring Posting of Each High Radiation Area with Signs Displaying Listed Words IR 05000461/19990051999-03-10010 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/99-05 on 990208-12.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program IR 05000461/19980281999-02-0101 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-28 on 981214-18.No Violations Noted. Major Areas inspected:follow-up Review of Licensee Program for Implementating 10CFR50.65,maint,quality Assurance Program & Engineering IR 05000461/19980201999-01-22022 January 1999 Insp Rept 50-461/98-20 on 981118-990106.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support PNO-III-99-002, on 990106,partial Loss of Offsite Power Occurred.Power Lost to Rhrs,Normal Shutdown Cooling Sys & in Svc at Time of Event.Plant Three EDGs Started Automatically & Provided Power to Safety Sys.Power Restored to Rhrs Pump1999-01-0808 January 1999 PNO-III-99-002:on 990106,partial Loss of Offsite Power Occurred.Power Lost to Rhrs,Normal Shutdown Cooling Sys & in Svc at Time of Event.Plant Three EDGs Started Automatically & Provided Power to Safety Sys.Power Restored to Rhrs Pump IR 05000461/19980271998-12-31031 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-27 on 981117-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000461/19980181998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-18 on 981002-1117.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980261998-12-13013 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-26 on 981013-30.Violations Were Identified,But No Notice Was Issued.Major Areas Inspected: Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980191998-11-25025 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-19 on 980914-1009.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20155E7131998-10-30030 October 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980819-1001.Violation Noted:On 980909,operator Responding to Alarming Annunciator on Area Radiation Monitoring Sys Did Not Announce Annunciator to Control Room Supervisor IR 05000461/19980171998-10-30030 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-17 on 980819-1001.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980241998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-24 on 980921-1001.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Radiological Planning for ECC Suction Strainer Mod IR 05000461/19980251998-10-28028 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-25 on 981005-09.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Portion of EP Program,Review of Documentation,Tours & Observations of Emergency Response Facilities & Equipment & Follow Up on Previous Findings IR 05000461/19983011998-10-0909 October 1998 NRC Operator Licensing Retake Exam Rept 50-461/98-301(OL) Administered to One Applicant Requesting SRO License on 980831-0904.Applicant Passed Operating Retake Exam But Not Issued SRO License to Operate Plant IR 05000461/19980141998-09-17017 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-14 on 980707-0818.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support ML20237B1531998-08-11011 August 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980521.Violation Noted:On 980119,individual Exited RCA Utilizing Point Other than Designated Areas W/O Obtaining Approval from Radiological Operations Supervisor IR 05000461/19980111998-08-0707 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-11 on 980527-0710.Enforcement Discretion Being Exercised for Six Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000461/19980131998-07-0808 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-13 on 980622-25.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Aspects of RP Program ML20236L3071998-07-0707 July 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980504-08.Violation Noted: on 980213,ERDS Not Initiated within 1 H of Declaration of Alert & Only One Electrical Maint Personnel on Shift Trained & Assigned as Member of Emergency Response Organization ML20236L3171998-07-0707 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-09 on 980504-08.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Documentation Re Actual EP Activation,Evaluation of Quality of EP Program Related Audits & Reviews & Effectiveness of Mgt Controls IR 05000461/19980081998-06-25025 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-08 on 980414-0528.Enforcement Discretion Has Been Authorized for Listed Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20237E6641998-06-0505 June 1998 EN-98-044:informs Commission That NRC Intends to Exercise Enforcement Discretion & Not Issue Citation or Propose Civil Penalty for Four Violations of Maint Rule.Ltr Describing Action Will Be Issued on or About 980612 ML20248J8641998-06-0303 June 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980511-15.Violation Noted: Between 980429 & 980513,control Rod Drive Filter Area on 712 Elevation of Turbine Building,Radiation Area W/Radiation Dose of 8 Mrem Per Hour,Was Not Posted W/Warning Sign IR 05000461/19980101998-06-0303 June 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-10 on 980511-15.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980061998-05-11011 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-06 on 980304-0414.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20217F4431998-04-22022 April 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980323-27.Violation Noted: Description of Facility in USAR Not Accurate in All Matl Respects ML20217F4611998-04-22022 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-07 on 980323-27.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000461/19980031998-03-27027 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-03 on 980123-0303.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000461/19973131998-03-24024 March 1998 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-461/97-313OL Conducted on 980126-0205.Exam Results:Exam Was Administered to Two RO & Seven SRO Applicants.Five SRO & Two RO Applicants Passed All Portions of Exam & Two SRO Applicants Failed ML20217D8511998-03-20020 March 1998 EN-98-014:informs Commission That NRC Will Exercise Enforcement Discretion Per Section VII.B.2 of Enforcement Policy & Not Issue NOV to Il Power Co for Several Violations Associated W/Loss of Shutdown Cooling Event on 980213 IR 05000461/19980041998-03-20020 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-461/98-04 on 980213-16.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Maint 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Inspection Report - Clinton - 1987003 |
---|
|
|
Text
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-461/87003(DRSS)
Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-55 Licensee: Illinois Power Company 500 South 27th Street Decatur, IL 62525 Facility Name: Clinton Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection At: Clinton Site, Clinton, Illinois Inspection Conducted: January 12-15,1987 Inspectors: es Foster 22 7 eam Leader Dage' /
ff Ted Allen 2-Date f$
Approved By j: William Snell, Chief
~
,8 87 Emergency Preparedness Section Date g/7 Inspection Summary Inspection on January 12-15, 1987 (Report No. 50-461/87003(DRSS))
Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the Clinton Power Station emergency preparedness exercise involving observations by five NRC representatives of key functions and locations during the exercis The inspection involved three NRC inspectors and two consultant Results: Two violations were identified relative to inadequate corrective action on two previous Exercise Weaknesse These two repeat exercise weaknesses are summarized in the Appendi PDR ADOCK 05000461 Q PDR
._ .- _ -
._ ..
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
-
.
DETAILS Persons Contacted NRC Observers and Areas Observed James Foster, Control Room, TSC, OSC, E0F Ted Allen, OSC, In plant Teams, PASS Sample Hironori Peterson, Control Room, Emergency Operations Facility (E0F)
Mike Stein, Control Room Carl Corbit, EOF Illinois Power Company
- J. Perry, Emergency Manager
- F. Spangenberg, Manager, Licensing and Safety
- J. Greenwood, Manager Power Supply
- D. Hillyer, Director Radiation Protection
- J. Wilson, Power Plant Manager
- H. Lane, Manager Scheduling and Outage Maintenance j *R. Wyatt, Director Nuclear Planning
- T. Camilleri, Director Nuclear Projects
- J. Cook, Assistant Power Plant Manager
- R. Campbell, Manager Quality Assurance
- E. Till, Director Nuclear Training
'
C. Graf, Control Room (simulator) Controller J. Hunsicker, Laboratory Controller A. Adams, Public Affairs J. Brownell, Licensing Specialist G. Baker, Supervisor Medical Programs J. Dodson, Emergency Information Coordinator M. Graham, Public Information Coordinator T. Cammelleria, Controller K. Rollofson, Controller Messenger J. Skov, Lead Controller, Operational Support Center (OSC)
R. Derbort, Controller, Injured Person W. Mullins, Controller, Post Accident Sample System (PASS)
P. Sefranek, Controller, PASS Panel T. Roe, OSC Supervisor M. Reandeau, Radiological Control Coordinator, OSC M. McLure, Technical Information Liaison J. Wemlinger, Technical Information Liaison C. Kretz, Stenographer s
_ .. .
-
. Non-Illinois Power Company W. Weaver, FEMA Region V G. Wenger, FEMA Region V E. Field, Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety A. Pepper, Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety N. Corrington, Macon Co. ESDA M. Strain, DeWitt Co./Clinton Co. ESDA
- Denotes those personnel listed above who attended the exit interview on January 14, 198 . Licensee Action on Previously Identified Open Items (Closed) Open Item No. 461/85040-03. The classification of the General Emergency was inappropriately delayed during the 1985 Emergency Exercise. During the next (1987) Exercise, there was once again an inappropriate delay in declaring a General Emergency. This is a repeat of the previous Exercise Weakness and is therefore a violation. The old Open Item No. 461/85040-03 will be closed and the violation will be tracked under a new Open Item No. 461/87003-0 (Closed) Open Item No. 461/85040-05. During the 1985 Emergency Exercise, it was observed that the contamination control practices in the EOF Environmental Laboratory were poor. During the next (1987) exercise, it was observed to be still poor. This is a repeat of the previous Exercise Weakness and is therefore a violation. The old Open Item No. 461/85040-05 will be closed and the violation will be tracked under a new Open Item No. 461/87003-0 (Closed) Open Item No. 461/85039-18. Need to determine the percentage of availability of meteorological data. The licensee provided data packages which indicated that meteorological data availability for three parameters (sixty meter windspeed and direction, ten meter windspeed and direction, and sixty and ten meter temperature, delta temperature and precipitation) had been consistently greater than 90% during a study period of three months. This item is close (Closed) Open Item No. 461/85040-06. During the previous Emergency Exercise, the information flow to the media was at times poor. During the present exercise, information flow to the media was determined to be adequate. This item is close . General '
An exercise of the Clinton Power Plant Emergency Plan was conducted at the Clinton station on January 13, 1987. The exercise tested the applicant's and offsite emergency support organizations' capabilities to respond to a simulated accident scenario resulting in a major release of radioactive effluent. Attachment I describes the Scope and Objectives of the exercise and Attachment 2 describes the exercise scenari ,
.
-
The exercise was integrated with a test of the emergency plans of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (IDNS) and Illinois Emergency Services and Disaster Agency (ESDA). This was a full participation exercise for the State of Illinois and DeWitt Count . General Observations Procedures This exercise was conducted in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E requirements using the Power Station Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures, Coordination The applicant's response was coordinated, orderly and generally timely. If the events had been real, the actions taken by the applicant.would have been sufficient to permit the State and local authorities to take appropriate actions to protect the public's health and safet Observers The applicant's observers monitored and critiqued this exercise along with five NRC observers and a number of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) observer FEMA observations on the response of State and local governments will be provided in a separate repor Exercise Critiques A critique was held with the applicant and NRC representatives on January 14, 1987, the day after the exercise. The NRC discussed the observed strengths and weaknesses during the exit intervie In addition, a public critique was held at the Clinton Station Visitor's Center on January 15, 1987, to present the preliminary onsite and offsite findings of the NRC and FEMA exercise observers, respectivel . Specific Observations Control Room Assignment of responsibilities among the Control Room staff was effective; the Shift Supervisor was able to focus on EAL declarations, communications, and event mitigating strategies, while his crew carried out the detailed actions associated with plant contro Control Room personnel were knowledgeable regarding the proper procedures to use, and used their procedures. The operators continued to search for alternative system lineups to restore reactor vessel level even after it was obvious that their efforts would be unsuccessfu .
Throughout the exercise there was very good communication formality and methodology, e.g. " repeat backs" and use of "This is a drill" statement Notifications to the State and NRC were accurate, transmitted expeditiously, and performed in accordance with procedure. Log keeping by the Shift Supervisor was satisfactory, and the use of a tape recorder to record events in the Control Room appeared worthwhile for accident reconstruction. Operators reacted effectively and promptly, using a commercial telephone connection when the " re phone" to the NRC was inoperabl One of the few weak areas noted in the performance of Control Room Staff, was that they did not quantify the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) leak rate either by thumb rule or calculation after the initial estimate of 20 gpm at 0908 hour0.0105 days <br />0.252 hours <br />0.0015 weeks <br />3.45494e-4 months <br /> Support for the Control Room could also have been better at time For example, projections of time to core uncovery and estimated time remaining before limits were exceeded on suppression pool temperature, containment temperature, and containment pressure were not provided by the TSC or EOF to the Control Roo Following the declaration of a Notice of Unusual Event (NUE) and escalation to the Alert, there were too many calls to the Control Room for press release information. The phone calls would have been even more disruptive if the Shift Supervisor had not made it clear that they were a low priority compared to making required notifications. When the hospital called the Control Room for information on the injured man, it was provided by the Shift Supervisor because he had overheard some of the radio traffic between the scene and the OSC. Since an official report had not been provided to the Control Room, there was little assurance that the Shift Supervisor had the most recent information. The request for information should have been referred to the OS The interface between the Control Room and support personnel was generally good, but several problems were noted. For example, the Control Room did not receive a report confirming the fire after an operator was sent to check out the fire alarm. There was also r
some disagreement between the Control Room operators and Repair Team No. 2 about which valve was to be opened locally to restore a path for RHR flo Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program is acceptabl b. Technical Support Center (TSC)
Technical Support Center (TSC) activation began upon declaration of the Alert, and was fully staffed at within 30 minutes. Upon arrival, TSC personnel immediately went to assigned positions,
_
r
'i .
. s i
prepared supplies, reviewed checklists, and prepared to assume their duties. Status boards were filled out as initial data became available. Command and control of the emergency response were formally transferred to the TSC following a briefing of the Site Emergency Director (SED) by the Control Room Shift Supervisor, Good control was demonstrated by the TSC. manager throughout the exercise, and noise levels in the TSC were acceptable. Briefings and updates of information were periodically ccnducted'in the TSC to good effec ,
I Status boards were very well utilized, including those displaying
' present and forecast weather conditions, major problems, plant 2 parameters and radiological effluent from the Standby Gas Treatment System (SBGTS). Trending of SBGTS effluent noble gas radiation levels and reactor vessel level was performed, and advance estimates were made of fuel uncovery timeframe based on the rate of reactor
'
vessel level decreas '
TSC personnel demonstrated determination, perseverance, and ingenuity in their attempts to find ways to mitigate the accident. Several creative system lineups', and unique ways to get water to the vessel (breaking of condenser tubes by explosives as a way to'obtain circulating water) were explored. The SED did an excellent job of keeping the team directed at principal problem areas'and most i j likely avenues of corrective actio t Checklists, logs, notification forms, and applicable procedures
, were referred to by TSC personnel. Procedures and form,s_were used extensively. Communication, including information flow to on-site response facilities arid notifications to Federal, State and local authorities appeared to be excellen Assembly and accountability of non-essential personnel was successfully demonstrated within the goal of 30 minute Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program is acceptabl #
c. Operational Support Center (OSC) .-
The Operational Support Center (GC; ,*a< _:tivated, manned, and placed in operation within 15 min. w s a n. the declaration of an Alert. The OSC Supervisor formally informed'the Technical Support Center (TSC) that the OSC was activated and that he was in charg inroughout the exercise, the OSC Supervisor provided frequent briefings to the OSC staff, maintained control of the OSC, and otherwise oemonstrated his ability to make appropriate decisions and to satisfactorily direct OSC operation .
.
The OSC was very well equipped and staffed. The OSC staff worked well together and used emergency procedure checklists to complete equipment checks in a timely manner. Emergency and operating procedures, technical manuals, plant maps and plans, and repair and damage control equipment were readily available. Personnel dosimetry, radiological protection clothing, and instruments were available and properly used. Muster logs for various skills and trade specialities were maintained and adequate numbers of personnel were present to support the many teams dispatched during the exercis Communications between the OSC and in plant teams and TSC were generally good, and the communications equipment proved to be reliable. Designated communicators and recorders maintained adequate communication logs and assisted with status board Status boards were effectively utilized to keep track of plant conditions, in plant teams, in plant radiation levels, and for briefing Habitability at the OSC was confirmed promptly and periodically assessed throughout the exercise. Radiological control practices at the OSC were adequately demonstrated during the exercis Personnel were either frisked for contamination or passed tnrough portal radiation monitors to enter the OSC. Radiation Protection (RP)
personnel checked material brought into the OSC, maintained contaminated waste control, properly directed the use of anti-contamination clothing, and issued and collected dosimetry devices. Each in plant team included at least one RP Technicia Assignment of personnel to in plant teams to perform tasks requested by the Control Room, TSC, or OSC Supervisor was done in a timely manner. Clear instructions and briefings were provided to the teams, including anticipated hazards, radiation exposure restrictions, and travel routes. " Emergency Team Data Sheets" were used to document team composition, tasks, restrictions, and individual exposure Teams were dispatched in a timely manner except for the fire brigade team which took about 20 minutes to organize and dispatch. Part of the delay was because some fire brigade members had previously
" suited up" in anti-contamination clothing in case they were needed for other assignments. Consequently, they did not have time to check out their fire brigade equipment and had to remove their anti-contamination clothing before donning their fire fighting gea An adequate number of fire brigade personnel should be available to .
initially check out the fire brigade gear and be held for fire -
brigade team duties unless they are urgently needed elsewher Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program is acceptabl . ___ _ _ .
- .. .. - - - .- - - - - .- -~
M d
-
b >
d. -Injured Person Drill
~
, A search and rescue team was promptly formed and dispatched from the
- OSC in_ response to a report that one worker had not been accounted for during personnel accountability procedures. The team, including
- a station nurse and RP technician, was well briefed on the use of the stretcher, the last known location of the missing worker, the search
- pathway, and how frequently to report back to the OSC. The team l worked well together, and displayed good attitudes and role playing
- during the entire drill.
'
The missing worker was located near the lowest level of the Auxiliary Building and was simulated as being unconscious and suffering from a
'
i compound fracture of the right leg, a large laceration to the left leg, and a contusion to the right cheek. Colored fluid, make-up,
[. and a leg fracture moulage were used to simulate the injuries, j Vital signs and physical responses were provided by a controller.
l" The worker's clothes were simulated as being heavily contaminated, while body contamination levels were simulated as being about ten j times control level The injured person's location and apparent condition were promptly communicated to the OSC. His status was first determined by the
- nurse and prompt treatment was administered to the fractured leg
'
and then the laceration. The team worked well together and the RP technician conducted general area radiation surveys, collected an-air sample, and monitored the injured person. One team member could have ingested internal radioactivity (had .the simulated conditions been real) from blowing up the air splint applied to the victim's
'
. leg. A blow tube cover or air bulb hand pump could be used to
'
eliminate the chance of personnel internal contamination from blowing on a tube that may become contaminated, j The clothing was cut and removed from the injured person and he ,
j was carefully placed on the stretcher for transport to an ambulance.
l The team started up the first flight of stairs with the stretcher l positioned so the injured person's feet went first. A controller properly stopped the team and had them turn so the injured person's
- head was first up the stairs. An injured person should not be carried upstairs feet first due to the difficulty in maintaining the person's head even with or slightly elevated in respect to his fee A radiological controlled area had been established at an exit door when the team arrived with the injured person. However, the ambulance I did not arrive for about 30 minutes, or until about an hour after the -
injured person's condition was reported to the OSC. A faster response by the ambulance should be possible. The injured person was properly transferred to the ambulance with a minimal chance of contamination of the ambulance or crew and a RP technician accompanied the injured i person in the ambulance.
{
8 L
-
.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program is acceptable, e. Post Accident Sampling System Drill (PASS)
The Post Accident Sampling System (PASS) team was dispatched from the OSC. Actual sampling operations including the collection and analyses of a containment atmosphere and containment water sample were executed. Panel operators and laboratory chemists followed the procedures step-by-step, as expected. The PASS team members worked well together and demonstrated their familiarity with PASS operations. Samples were collected, packaged, transported to the laboratory, and analyzed in a controlled and timely manner and with minimum handling. The syringe used to withdraw a liquid sample from the PASS panel had been modified by adding a locking plate to hold the syringe handle at the desired position. The locking plate is an improvement over the previously used rubber spacers and simplified syringe us Radiation monitoring and exposure control for the PASS team was generally good. The RP technician conducted periodic habitability surveys, directed radiological control steps, and monitored the PASS panel at required and appropriate times. Pocket dosirr.eters were frequently checked for accumulated exposures. The RP technician recognized the need for and requested exposure extensions for himself and the panel operators. The extensions were granted and properly recorded on exposure control records. An exception to the good radiological control practices was when the RP technician was approximately five minutes slow in having the PASS team relocate to a lower radiation exposure area to wait for a lengthy sample purg Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program is acceptabl .
f. Emergency Operations Facil'ity (EOF)
The EOF was activated in a timely manner, and personnel began ,
their tasks in a professional manner. Status boards were filled in as data became available. The human factors engineering and frequent updating of the status boards were excellent. The EOF was provided with habitability surveys, dosimeters and had electronic surveillance activated in a timely manner. Observed personnel and equipment / facility surveys were appropriately implemente The EOF Emergency Manager was clearly in charge of the facility and periodically provided the entire E0F staff with updates on the emergency status. The EOF Emergency Manager also held periodic meetings with his immediate staff. Good information flow was observed during these meeting . - - _ _ _ _ -
.
The noise level in the EOF was low, and only required two reminders by the Emergency Manager for maintenance of the low noise leve The Emergency Manager used a microphone / speaker to make all announcements which were clearly heard by all EOF staf All exercise staff conducted their assignments in a professional and business-like manner. Good engineering ingenuity was displayed in the attempts to find alternate methods to inject water into the reactor vesse The Emergency Information staff appeared to maintain good communications with the Joint Public Information Center (JPIC).
The EOF log and recordkeeping was very good, and would have allowed reconstruction of EOF actions during the acciden The Emergency Exercise Controllers implemented their roles in an effective manner and no prompting was observe The location for field team access and egress within the EOF were zoned, covered with plastic and had plastic-lined barrels for contaminated clothing. The laboratory and Field Team supplies appeared to be adequat All field team members were observed conducting inventory and equipment function checks, using check-off procedures in a business-like manne The Field Team Coordinator maintained good communications with the field teams in a crisp and decisive manne The Dose Assessment Supervisor, although under considerable pressure from time-to-time, was very good at ensuring that precise communications were provided before definitive statements were mad The General Emergency was not declared when required by plant conditions. At 1000, the plant had experienced a loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA) with failure of the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS), a potential core melt situation that warranted an EAL '
escalation in accordance with Emergency Classification Procedure EC-02. Pertinent sections of Procedure EC-02 would be
" fuel cladding," " fuel cladding failure and actual or potential failure of both reactor coolant boundary and primary containment,"
or "other" which references BWR accident Sequences in Table 4.4 of the Emergency Pla At approximately 20 minutes into the Site Area Emergan:y (1017 hours0.0118 days <br />0.283 hours <br />0.00168 weeks <br />3.869685e-4 months <br />),
the Emergency Manager announced that one fission barrier was breached, the second was in jeopardy, and the third was still intact. Although
___ ._
. -, _ . _ - _ -
. - - - . -
.
.
during this general time period the reactor vessel level was steadily decreasing due to a LOCA and loss of ECCS, the containment pressure and temperature was increasing, along with the level of radioactivity released via the SBGTS, the Emergency Manager did not declare a General Emergenc At approximately 1130, the Emergency Manager was aware that two fission product barriers were breached. He stated that once indicators of containment integrity loss were present, he would escalate to the General Emergency Classification. During this time, a continuous higher than normal radioactive release was underway from the noble gas effluent of the SBGTS, and the release rate was increasing steadil At 1137 hours0.0132 days <br />0.316 hours <br />0.00188 weeks <br />4.326285e-4 months <br />, the EAL evaluator came to the conclusion via the EAL tables that the plant should be in a General Emergency. This information should have been immediately given to the Emergency Manager and a General Emergency declare However, the recommendation was not provided until a staff meeting held at 1142 hours0.0132 days <br />0.317 hours <br />0.00189 weeks <br />4.34531e-4 months <br />, and the i
General Emergency was declared formally at 1150 hour0.0133 days <br />0.319 hours <br />0.0019 weeks <br />4.37575e-4 months <br /> When the General Emergency was not declared based on a LOCA with
,
failure of ECCS, then the subsequent trends of important plant parameters should have resulted in escalation based on predictable core damage and a recognizable, though gradual, failure of containment. Following failure of ECCS due to the loss of electrical bus 1B1, the trend of reactor vessel level indicated eventual core uncovery, while increasing Standby Gas Treatment System activity indicated the early stages of a radioactive release, and rising suppression pool temperatures (with no prospects for restoring suppression pool cooling or providing containment spray)
assured that containment pressure would continue to increas It was concluded that the General Emergency should have been declared sometime between 1030 and 1130 hours0.0131 days <br />0.314 hours <br />0.00187 weeks <br />4.29965e-4 months <br />, but definitely earlier than 1150 hours0.0133 days <br />0.319 hours <br />0.0019 weeks <br />4.37575e-4 months <br />, per either the LOCA and loss of all ECCS (and heat sink),
j or the existing declining trend of plant parameters. This was considered as an Exercise Weakness, and is similar to a previous Exercise Weakness. This new Weakness will be tracked as Open Item No. 461/87003-0 In addition, the failure to correct this Exercise Weakness is a violatio Two snow samples and one air sample were analyzed in the EOF Environmental Laboratory. These samples were essentially free of radioactive contamination, and were double-bagged to minimize external contamination potential. However, had the samples been contaminated, laboratory and personnel contamination would have been likely for the following reasons:
(1) No contamination detection instrumentation nor "swi a>"
were available to establish contamination status.
l
l
-. _-.
.._ ,__, _ _ _ _ _ , . ._. _ _ . _
.
.
(2) The sample bags were sealed with " duct" type tape that the technician had great difficulty removing. The violent efforts to open the bags would lead both to personnel and laboratory contaminatio (3) The snow samples were removed from two plastic bags by dipping the containers into the bags. Dripping snow water was observed on the outside of the container (4) No contamination surveys appeared to be available, and no forms for survey results appeared to be availabl In summary, the observed methods for contamination control in the EOF environmental laboratory were inadequate and considered an Exercise Weakness. These observations are similar to the observations made in the previous exercise that resulted in an Exercise Weakness. This new Weakness will be tracked as Open Item No. 461/87003-02. The failure to correct this Exercise Weakness is also a violatio The communications on a few radiological conditions led to disagreements between some EOF staff members. A contamination incident occurred inside the entrance to the E0F in the properly-zoned access / egress location. Duri.ng habitability surveys, 700-900 DPM of contamination was found in the hallway outside of the EOF roo Since the level was less than the 1000 DPM limit, the E0F room staff determined (properly) that no limit had been exceeded. The access / egress location, however, was contaminated above the limi The technicians that were surveying then received conflicting instructions that were properly resolved by the EOF Decontamination Coordinator, who promptly stated "I am responsible for this area, and it will be treated as contamination." Cleanup and resurvey
-
efforts were reasonably promp There was confusion on interpretation of the SPING Monitor readings in terms of what they mean. Although simple interpretation was apparently not covered by procedure, the technician was able, after a few minutes, to make a tentative judgemen Field monitoring data and plant release projections appeared to vary by a factor of 50 on one occasion during the exercise. Dose rate projections from the EOF were approximately 200 mR/hr, but the Field -
Team had readings of less than 4 mR/hr. Similarly, the Field Teams -
had instructions (from somewhere) that a two week jump into Recovery had been initiated. After a conference with the Field Team Coordinator, the Dose Assessment Supervisor told them to hold their positions for 10 minutes until verification occurre Although no major problems arose in these few instances of communications problems, attention should be given to them to minimize the chances of recurrenc .
The EOF Status Board with listing of staff members was generally maintained up-to-date as members arrived at the EOF room. However, the security guard who printed the names on the board generally had to stop the team members as they came in and ask them what their name was; each member should be instructed to provide name and position automatically as they arriv In addition, one status board block, lined with red tape (indicating the need to be filled in before declaring the E0F operational) was never completed. This block indicates the readiness of a Field Team for deployment. The Dose assessment Supervisor or his delegate should inform the status board security guard of team readiness if this red-lined block is to be use Two violations were identified in this area, Offsite Radiological Monitoring Teams No NRC observers were assigned to offsite radiological monitoring teams for this exercis Joint Public Information Center (JPIC)
No NRC observers were assigned to this area. A review of information flow documentation indicated that information was adequat . Licensee Critiques The licensee held three levels of critiques, one at the individpal facility immediately following the exercise a second on the day after the exercise, and a formal critique. NRC personnel attended some of these critiques and determined that exercise deficiencies of significance had been identified by the licensee, with minor exception . Exercise Scenario and Control The exercise scenario was challenging, including an injured, contaminated man, multiple equipment failures, Post Accident Sample Team, assembly / accountability, and meteorological changes. The exercise escalated to the General Eraergency classificatio Minor scenario problems were noted. The control room (simulator)
panels were not tagged for equipment noted as out of service in the initial plant conditions, and this was corrected following comments by the operator The simulator operator was observed in conversation with Control Room players after questions had apparently been asked of him. The simulator operator should be identified as a controller or non playe . .. . - .
-
.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program is acceptabl . Exit Interview The inspectors held an exit interview the day after the exercise on January 14, 1987, with the representatives denoted in Section The NRC Team Leader discussed the scope and findings of the inspectio The applicant was also asked if any of the information discussed during the exit was proprietary. The applicant responded that none of the
'
information was proprietar Attachments: Clinton Exercise Scope and Objectives Clinton Exercise Scenario Summary 1,
4
,
l
,
- , _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . - _ . _ _ . _ , _ ____. . _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ . . _ - _ . . _ _ _ .
.
e-me
.
/
U I. INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF PARTICIPATION
~
The Clinton Power Station Emergency Exercise will be conducted during normal working hours to demonstrate the integrated capability of Illinois Power Company, the State of Illinois and local governments to respond to a simulated emergency at Clinton Power Station (CPS). The '
Exercise is designed to test as much of the Clinton Power Station Emergency Plan and the Illinois Plan for Radio-logical Accidents as is reasonably achievable without mandatory public participatio Illinois Power Company (IPC) will participate in the CPS Exercise by activating the Emergency Response Organi-zation and Emergency Response Facilities as appropriate, subject to limitations that may become necessary to provide for safe operations of the Plan In lieu of using the Main Control Room, the CPS '
Simulator Control Room will be used during the Exercis s Hereinafter, any reference to the Main Control Room t implies the Simulator. An off-duty Main Control Room-
\- shift crew will be pre-positioned in the Simulator to receive Exercise Message Illinois Power Company has established specific objectives and ground rules for the Exercise. These objectives and ground rules may be found later in this sectio IPC has also limited its participation in some area The areas which will not be demonstrated during the Exercise are, but not necessarily limited to, the following: Due to low power testino and startup activitfes
.
expected onsite during Ehe Exercise, evacuation of non-essential personnel and accountability will be limited to approximately fif ty (50)
Illinois Power Company personne . This scenario has a perceived fire internal to the plant creating a lot of smoke. The plant fire brigade will respond. However, no fire will be visually detected and assistance from the local volunteer Fire Department will not be required.
'
,
.
Revision 1 8/04/86 CLINTON POWER STATION 1986 EXERCISE OBJECTIVES Primary Objective:
Demonstrate the capability to implement the Clinton Power Station (CPS) Emergency Plan in cooperation with the Illinois Plan for Radiological Accidents (IPRA) to protect public health and safety, and plant personne Supporting Objectives: Demonstrate the capability to quickly and accurately identify and classify accident conditions consistent with implementing procedure . Once the emergency is classified or re-classified, demonstrate timely notification of the Illinois Emergency Services and Disaster Agency (IESDA), the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (IDNS) and the .
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).within the time O
3 required by implementing procedure Demonstrate the capability to properly notify IPC
'
'
Emergency Response Organization personnel in accordance with implementing procedure . Demonstrate the capability to activate the Technical Support Center (TSC), Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), Operations Support Center (OSC), Headquarters Support Center (HSC) and Joint Public Information Center (JPIC) in accordance with implementing procedure . Demonstrate the clear transfer of Command Authority from the Shift Supervisor, to the Station Emergency Director, to the Emergency Manager in accordance with implementing procedure . Demonstrate the capability to assess accident conditions by the collection and analysis of a Post Accident Sampling System (PASS) sample, by performing reactor core damage estimations, and by performing offsite dose assessment . Demonstrate the capability to dispatch and control Field Monitoring Teams during varying meteorological
,
.
O conditions.
I
- .
, -. ~w. -.- --._ ~-y _ , . . , _ , _ , _ . .,,m.,_m.mme, -,,,s .,_._% ,.,,c.-.,-......,m..._m.-,__.,n,., ...,.__..y,-_ -
-
.
Revision 1 8/04/86 ss- l 8.- Demonstrate the capability of Field Monitoring Teams to conduct field radiological surveys, including the collection and analysis of air samples for radioiodine, and to collect, as needed, additional liquid, vegetation and coil sample . Demonstrate the capability of emergency workers to receive, analyze, and store field samples in the EOF Environmental Laboratory while following approved procedures and acceptable radiological control . Demonstrate the capability to perform offsite dose assessments in coordination with governmental authoritie . Demonstrate the capability of the Operations Support Center to control emergency teams including emergency maintenance activitie . Demonstrate implementation of effective health physics controls by the emergency team . Demonstrate the capability to provide dosimetry and monitor radiation exposures to onsite emergency workers .
and Field Monitoring Team ,
1 Demonstrate the capability to effectively communicate reports, information and assessments of the situation among participating principal command and control centers, personnel and emergency team . Demonstrate the capability to make appropriate, timely public protective action recommendations to offsite authorities in accordance with implementing procedure . Demonstrate timely, effective informat on flow from the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) to the Joint Public Information Center (JPIC).
17. Demonstrate the capability to provide accurate, timely information to the news media from the JPIC in
,
cooperation with governmental agencies.
l 18. Demonstrate the ability, through discussion, to i implement appropriate measures for controlled recovery
.
and re-entry.
\
l 1 Demonstrate the capability to critique objectively the emergency response and identify deficiencies. This
! will necessarily require an evaluation of items such as (1) the operation of the Emergency Response Facilities,
'
(2) suitability of individuals in fulfilling emergency
'
- assignments and (3) the adequacy of emergency procedures and equipment availabl .*
I ~ SCENARIO -
Initial Conditions the Day Before the Exercise (January 12, 1987)
Clinton Power Station (CPS) is operating at full powe This is the 95th continuous day at full power. Fuel exposure'
is approximately 3500 Megawatt Days per Ton (MWD /T) int cycle 1. -Reactor coolant chemistry is within normal speci-fication .
The High Pressure. Core Spray (HPCS) system was tagged out earlier this morning. The plant is in a 14-day Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO), Maintenance personnel will begin work to replace several sections of the pump impeller later today. The work is needed to increase the slowly degrading efficiency of the pump. The maintenance work is expected to take five day Initial Conditions on Exercise Day (January 13, 1987) -
O
.
Clinton Power Station (CPS) continues to operate at full power. CPS is in its second day of a 14-day Limiting Condition for operation (LCO) due to the inoperability of the High Pressure Core Spray (HPCS) system. Maintenance work on the pump impeller began yesterday morning following a tag-out of the HPCS syste Time has nearly expired on the quarterly operability surveillance of Low Pressure Core Spray (LPCS) valves. The LPCS system was temporarily placed out of service this morning at 0500 Hours to cycle and record valve stroke time The planned surveillance will place CPS in another LCO action statement to return LPCS to service or be in Hot Shutdown within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The surveillance is expected to last until 1000 Hours today, at which time the LPCS system will be returned to service.
O
,
,
.
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
-
.
Q N.)
NARRATIVE SUMMARY FOR THE 1986 CLINTON POWER STATION EXERCISE SCENARIO Initially, Clinton Power Station will be operating at approximately 100 percent power, near mid-cycle core life. CPS is in its second day of a 14-day Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) due to the inoperability of the High Pressure Core Spray (HPCS) system. The Maintenance Department is replacing several sections of the HPCS pump impeller to increase the slowly de-grading efficiency of the pum Time has nearly expired on the cuarterly operability surviellance of Low Pressure Core Spray (LPCS) valve The LPCS will be placed temporarily out of service in the morning to cycle and record valves stroke time The planned surveillance will place CPS in a Technical Specification action statement to return LPCS to service or be in Hot Shutdown within 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> The tests are expected to take two hours, at which time the LPCS system will be returned to servic .
UNUSUAL EVENT (0800-0900)
i O\_ ,/ While performing Low Pressure Core Spray (LPCS) valve operability tests, the LPCS Suppression Pool Suction Valve 1E21F001 will be timed shut. However, upon given an open signal, the valve fails to open. Problems with mechanigal binding within the valve and motor operator render the valve inoperabl Realizing that the valve cannot be repaired quickly, the Shift Supervisor must declare LPCS inoperable and order a controlled plant shutdow An Unusual Event should be declare ALERT (0900-0950)
While proceeding towards hot shutdown, a feedwater control i
system malfunction will occur causing feedwater pump ramp up and high reactor water level scra The feedwater pumps will
- not trip in time to prevent flooding of the main steam line ; Almost simultaneously, a failure in the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) initiation logic will cause the RCIC system to ,
automatically start. Since the RCIC turbine utilizes steam from
the main steam lines, a water slua will be forced through the RCIC steam supply piping. An unisolatable RCIC steam supply line break will then occur within the Drywell due to water hammer. High pressure and temperature in the Drywell will immediately indicate a breach in the reactor coolant pressure
- boundary and an Alert should be declared.
' O l V
. - - - - , . _ . , - , . . - - , . . - - - - . , _ . . . . _ . . _ - - - - , . . , - . - - , , . , , - , , _
- -
-, ,- - , - - . . - - - - -
..
.
SITE AREA EMERGENCY (0950-1130)
O The RCIC line break will cause the reactor to depressurize allowing the operation of low pressure Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS). Low Pressure Coolant Injection pump A (LPCI A)
fails to start. Low Pressure Coolant Injection pump C (LPCI C)
is used to control reactor water level. Residual Heat Removal pump B (RHR B) will be placed in suppression pool cooling mod *
Later, smoke is indicated on the 781' elevation of the Auxiliary Building followed by the loss of the Division II 125 VDC power. Control power is lost to Division II equipment causing LPCI C and RHR B to trip. No major source of water to the reactor is available. The smoke indicates a fire of some nature occurred in the~ Auxiliary Building causing the loss of Division II 125 VDC, a safe shutdown system. A Site Area Emergency should be declare GENERAL EMERGENCY (1130-1430)
Reactor water level will fall below the top of the active fue The reactor will be depressurized. A General Emergency should be declared due to the loss of 2 of 3 fission product barriers, and the potential loss of the thir '~' Efforts to restore significant cuantities of water to the reactor will prove fruitless. Suppression pool temperature will increase to above design limits. Localized boiling will occur in the suppression pool causing an increase in containment pressur "
,
The increase in Containment pressure will cause Containment -
leak rate to increase dramaticall Due to the onset of fuel damage and the high radioactive concentration airborne in Containment, substantial radiological releases will occur through Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS).
RECOVERY (1430-1630)
Emergency repairs will be completed which will allow a primary injection system to reflood the reactor. Containment spray will be used to quickly reduce Containment pressur Radiological release rates will then decrease and recovery /
reentry plans will be discussed.
,
lo
,
!
i
.*
O Termination g m
O
c$
Ec
' $0 8N 8:86
N
-
hEO oo m t Recovery Discussions Cjg e v .a
{ Primary Reactor System Reflooded Restored
,
CEH
'
> bh LLJ o 8 Wind Shif ts W
" g -EOF Contaminated o ,f Containment Pressure Increases n W , Suppression Pool Bolling
t t:
O- o O
a
N O
Z O
W " g - Core Damage Begins
- g '( -Reactor Level at Top of Fuel O O
<
W E S x L1J
~
[>
' l "
Injured Man i h, l
8 5
-
g y
b e
O LPCI C Trip RHR B Trio L o s s of Div.11 125 VDC w Smoke 781' Ele. Aua. Bld W - LPCI A Fall to Start d N P
4 / l RCIC Steam Line Break RCIC Initiation 2 rj d Reactor High Level Scram Feedwater Ramp
$ ," ,
Z k
o
"***""'
O ! (. 3 - ' ' ' ' " '
L
. -.- - . - _ - - _ _ _ _ _