IR 05000456/1986012

Insp Repts 50-456/86-12 & 50-457/86-10 on 860317-21,0418 & 24.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings

ML20197C350
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	05/07/1986
From:	Danielson D, Kaufman P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20197C331	List: IR 05000456/1986012 ML20197C328
References
50-456-86-12, 50-457-86-10, NUDOCS 8605130329
Download: ML20197C350 (4)

Text

r

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Reports No. 50-456/86012(DRS); 50-457/86010(DRS)

Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457 Construction Permits No. CPPR-132; CPPR-133 Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company Post Office Box 767 Chicago, IL 60590 Facility Name: Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Braidwood Site, Braidwood, IL Inspection Conducted: March 17-21 and April 18, 24, 1986 Inspector:

hW E/7/l lIb

[4<P.D.Kaufman Oate M %l k / /

Approved By: D. H. Danielson, Chief f /7/bD Materials and Processes Date Section Inspection Summary Inspection on March 17-21 and April 18, 24, 1986 (Reports No. 50-456/86012(DRS);

50-457/86010(DRS))

Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection of licensee action on previous inspection finding Results: No violations or deviations were identifie >

hok51 0329 860507 G DOCK 05000456 PDR

-

.

-

DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO)

M. J. Wallace, Project Manager

• D. Shamblin, Project Construction Superintendent E. Wendorff, Project Field Engineerin; M. Lohmann, Assistant Construction Manager

• P. Barnes, Project Licensing and Compliance C. W. Schroeder, Superintendent Licensing D. Cecchett, Project Licensing and Compliance M. Inserra, Start-Up Test Engineer B. Wazing, Station QC Inspector

• D. Boone, Construction Engineer

• G. E. Groth, Assistant Construction Superintendent

• N. Kaushal, Project Field Engineering Manager Sarcent and Lundy Engineers (S&L)

K. Fus, Mechanical Project Engineer D. A. Gallagher, Field Project Manager Phillips-Getschow Company (PG)

M. Galloway, Assistant Project Engineer T. Johnson, Group Supervisor / Hanger Engineering K. Kranz, QA Manager W. Berg, QC Supervisor The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employee * Denotes those attending the final exit interview at the Braidwood Station on April 24, 198 . Licensee Action on Previous Inspection' Findings (Closed) Violation (456/84044-05; 457/84040-05): QA inspectors failed to identify areas where Phillips-Getschow Seismic Category I and other pipe support restraints have not been constructed in accordance with design requirement The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's response to this violation dated May 16, 1985, and verified the licensee's corrective actions taken to prevent recurrenc The NRC inspector reviewed the current procedure for this activity wnich is Phillips-Getschow Company Procedure QCP-B23, " Installation and Inspection of Component Supports," Revision 14. The procedure was in conformance with ANSI N45.2.8," Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants."

e

-

.

In addition, the NRC inspector reviewed documentation traveler packages produced under the QCP-823 procedure associated with 15 randomly chosen pipe supports which were recently QC inspected and accepted. The pipe support packages reviewed were as follows:

Pipe Support Packaces ISD01006R 1RYF59002G 1AB76010G 1CV06001V 1RC32001V 1SD25056V ISIO6035S 2RY09067S 2RH02006R 2FWO4008V 20027002R 2RY090705 2CS06040R 2FWO3012S 2FP48040G All of these packages reviewed conformed to the requirements of QCP-B23. Also, the hanger installation and adjustment checklists utilized to document in-process QC inspections were examined in the traveler packages. Attributes verified by the QC pipe support inspectors included:

location per sketch

locking devices installed and secure

welding complete

prcper material

support configuration

installation clearance guidelines

plumb or cold position

angle of strut / snubber

travel stops in place for spring hangers

clamp and U-bolt condition Subsequently, the NRC inspector conducted field walkdowns of these 15, recently CC verified and accepted, pipe supports. Attributes examined included; location, dimensicnal tolerances, welding, and configuratio The pipe supports were installed in compliance with Sargent and Lundy Specification F/L-2739, M-999 Tolerance drawings, and Phillips-Getschow Company Procedure, QCP-82 (0 pen) Violation (456/84044-07; 457/84040-07): Inspection activities affecting cuality were not effectively implemented in that weld sizes in pipe support / restraints were not identified to te of proper weld

-

O configurations. To '.arify the licensee's corrective actions the NRC inspector visually inspected 15 pipe supports which had been recently QC verified and accepted. Inspection of the following supports revealed no QC weld inspection deficiencies:

Pipe Supports ISD01006R 1RYF59002G 1A876010G 1CV06001V 1RC92001V 15025056V 151060355 2RYO90675 2RH02006R 2FWO4008V 20027002R 2RYO90705 2CS06040R 2FWO30125 2FP48040G ..

This item will remain open pending the NRC's review of Sargent and Lundy's engineering evaluations of 60 randomly selected pipe supports involving skewed T-fillet weld connections and Phillips-Getschow Company's supplemental weld qualification procedure for skewed fillet welds with skewed angles of 20 and 160 .

3. Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)

on April 24, 1986, and summarized the scope and findings of this inspectio The inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the inspector during the inspection. The licensee did not identify any r,uch documents or processes as proprietar