IR 05000425/1988034
| ML20151H350 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 07/14/1988 |
| From: | Belisle G, Wright R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151H347 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-425-88-34, NUDOCS 8808010250 | |
| Download: ML20151H350 (9) | |
Text
I
.
.
NITED STAVES
[pQ Otog o NUCLEAR Rt.
ILATORY COMMISSION
.7 s,
,
/
i 101000 ll h
,1
- e ATL ANTA. GE0HGf A 30323
' ' '
.
101 MARIETTA STHE ET, N.W.
%, +..../
Report No.:
50-425/88-34
' orgia Power Company License
-
O. Box 4545
".ta, GA 30302 Docks
.-425 License No.-
CPPR-109 Facili
.:
Vogtle 2 Inspection Cenducted: June 13-16, 1988 Inspector:
Lh. d b M 7//y[80 R.
. Wright f
Da'te Signed jf////[C I d n hMPMf//
Approved by:
/
G. A. Belisle',/ Chief
,/
(DateCSigned QualityAssuranceProgr[amsSection Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the area of onsite design activities.
Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
One unresolved item was identifitd involving missing Project Engineering Organization training documentation, paragraph 2.c.(1).
G000010250 000715 PDR ADOCK 05000425
PNU I
.
'
.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
.
Licensee Employees J. Boddie, Document Control Supervisor
- A. Gallant, Project Compliance Coordinator
- S. Haltom, QA Engineering Support Supervisor
- C, Hayes, Vogtle QA Manager
- W. Ramsey, Project Engineering Manager
- D. Smith, Construction Engineer Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included engineers, designers, technicians, and document control and administrative personnel.
Other Organizations i
Westinghouse - VSAMU
- M. Beer, Technical Assistant
G. Golshir, Support Reconciliation Manager B. Roy, Mechanicai Construction Support Manager
- D. Shaw, Project QA Engineer
,
'
Southern Company Services W. Edmundson, Project QA Engineer Bechtel
>
!
P. Chang, Civil / Structural Engineer, DE
)
S. Khan, Civil / Structural Engineer, DE F. Ling, Mechanical Engineering Group Leader, DE
'
- T. Richardson, Bechtel Project Engineering Manager
- J. Schuh, Mechanical Engineering Group Supervisor
'
- D. Strohman, Project QA Engineer
!
S. Thomas, Civil Engineering Building Group Leader, DE J. Valdez, Quality Engineer, DE
'
R. Wunderlich, Civil Engineering Group Leader, DE l
NRC Resident Inspector 8!
R. Schepens, tenior Resident Inspector-Censtruction I
j
- Attended exit interview
!
l 2.
Onsite Design Activities (37055)
This inspection was conducted to determine whether the licensee's, architect engineer's and contractor's onsite design activities, including controls for engineering and construction initiated field changes, are
.
_
._.
.
.
.
.
.
conducted in compliance with the technical and QA requirements described in the SAR.
a.
Onsite Design Organization and Responsib111 ties GPC has the ultimate desig: responsibility for VEGP and has delegated t. hat design work to BWPC, W (the NSSS), and SCS in accordance with the Vogtle Polices and Procedures Manual, Section 2.
Currently, almost all remaining design activity is performed onsite by the PEO. The onsite design capability for Unit 2 was greatly enhanced in January 1987, when the BWPC Vogtle Engineering organization (previously kn)wn as HOE - Norwalk, California and PFE - Vogtle site)
'
centralized their engineering effort by transferring H0E personnel to
,
the Vogtle site, keeping only a mimimum support staff at Norwalk.
The PE0 is comprised of a conglomerate of engineering personnel from
.
BWPC, W-VSAMU, and SCS, with BWPC having overall design responsibility.
The BWPC design control program is based on ANSI N45.2-1971
,
requirements, and is responsive to the intent of ANSI N45.2.11, Draft 2, Revision 2.
The PE0 consists of two engineering groups, Design Engineering and Installation Engineering. DE is comprised of six engineering groups:
Plant Design, C/S/A, Control System, Electrical, Mechanical, and Nuclear which are responsible for Unit 2's primary engineering design, and a Start-up Coordinator. IE performs the engineering work necessary to support construction activities and is primarily responsible for resolving field problems identified by the PCO.
currently consists of six groups: Mechanical Systems / Equipment, ASME Piping and Supports, 831.1 Design, As-Built Reconciliation, Penetra-tion Sealt, and Plant Design. W-VSAMU performs the scope of work assigned to the ASME Piping and Supports and the As-Built Reconcilia-tion IE groups.
SCS is responsible for the plant B31.1 piping and supports design group within IE.
Design participation by SCS and W-VSAMU is performed under the functional direction of Bechtel and
,
i
in accordance with Bechtel VEGP reference manual design control
procedures.
b.
Design Procedure Review
,
Responsible GPC, BWPC, and W-VSAMU site design perst.1nel were interviewed to determine their knowledge of the requirements contained
in the following applicable QA and PE0 manual procedures for control
,
i of the site design process.
The following procedures w4re also l
reviewed by the inspector to verify their adequ4cy and the Nowledge
[
'
of individuals utilizing them during the design process:
!
!
VEGP Project Reference Manual, Part C, Engineering l
Section 3, Project Review - Document Review Notice / Design f
Review l
!
l
'
I L
l
_ _ _ - _ _ _
e
.
'
Section 4, Bechtel Drawings Section 9 Design Calculations Section 17, Field Change Requests Section 18, Deviation / Operational Deficiency Reports l
Section 20, Design Review l
Section 25, NRC Inspection and Enforcement Notification, l
BPC Problem Alerts, and Operational Assessment l
Program Issues VEGP Project Reference Manual, Appendix 2, Engineering Field i.l'
Procedures Section 1, Division of Responsibility Section 14, Processing Authorization to Continue Work Section 15, Piping Systems Scope of Work Plant Vogtle Field Procedure Manual DC-A-01, Drawing Control DC-A-03, Change Requests and Notices
l GD-T-01, Nonconformance Control l
BPC QA Manual - ASME Section III - 1980 Edition Section 3, Design Control i
Section 6, Document Control Secsion 15, Nonconforming Items Section 18, Audits c.
Design Process Review (1) Design / Modifications
,
The inspector conducted discussions with :/S/A, mechanical engineers from DE, and with W-VSAMU engineering personnel from IE to determine whether they understood the applicable design control procedures and to verify proper implementation of the procedures.
The following onsite Bechtel design criteria, which are pertinent documents utilized for the design of Vogtle's HVAC systems, concrete structures, commodity supports, and piping and support analysis, were given a cursory review by the inspector:
,
DC-1000-C, General Design Criteria C/S DC-1000-M, General Design Criteria, Mechanical DC-1005, Seismic - Interdiscipline DC-1007 Environment - Interdiscipline DC-1017, Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Analysis DC-1204, Safety Injection System DC-1531, Control Building Control Room HVAC System
_ _ _ _
-
_-
.
.
.
.
The following design calculttions (two C/S/A, one mechanical W-VSAMU group pipe stress, and W-VSAMU support, respectively)
were selected for examination by the inspector to sample the acceptability of the design process:
Design Calculation No. X2CK4.9.3, Rev. 2, Sheets 63-65, Auxiliary Building Miscellaneous Steel Platforms ^or Va.ve Inspection (Reference DCN #6 and Drawing AXc0086042, Rev. 3)
Design Calculation No. X2CK4.8.15, Rev. 7. Sheets 329-338, Auxiliary Building Analysis and Design of Walls at
"D" Level (Reference IDCN #46 and #47 and Drawings AP080161 Rev. 2, AP080052, Rev. 6)
Design Calculation No. X4C1531517, Sheets 1-27 and Appendix Al-A27, Control Room (HVAC) System 1531, Multiple Train Operation (Reference CCP #B2003M, Rev. 1 and IDCN #14 thru 54 and affected drawings)
Design Calculation No. BJ-02-702, Rev. 1, Sheets 1-15, Pipe Stress Analysis for Safety Injection System (Reference Drawings 2J4-1204-051-03, Revs. O, 1, and 2; 2J4-1204-148-01, Rev. O, 1, and 2; 2J4-1204-153-01, Revs. 0, 1, 2, and 3)
Design Calculation No. V2-12V4-218-H603, Rev. O. Sheets 1-11, Pipe Support Evaluation (SIS) (Reference Drawings V2-1204-218-H603 Sheets 1 to 3 Revs. 0,1, and 2)
The latter two W-VSAMU calculations were performed by using
-
the W PIPSAN and WESTDYN computer programs. The onsite W-VS NJ group can only input data into the above programs to be aneiyzed.
The W (Pittsburgh, PA) computer program group controls all changes and performs benchmarking before new revisions to the programs are released.
The basis for the subject pipe stress and support analyses were explained to the inspector by responsible W -VSAMU engineering personnel.
The above mentioned design calculations were given a project check in accordance with PE0 procedures by personnel having technical capabilities either comparable or better than those of the originating engineer or designer.
The inspector examined the training records of six DE personnel to verify that they had completed QA orientation and that they had reviewed and under-stood required design manual sections, applicable PRM sections, and pertinent instructions including the latest revisions. No objective evidence cf training received (other than QA indoctri-nation) was founo for one engineer.
This engineer was the
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
.
originator of the C/S calculations examined above, and when interviewed by the inspector was found to be knowledgeable and
'
competent in the use of required applicable DC and PRM sections.
The engineer claimed to have read his assigned sections and completed the missing training records.
A second engineer's e
file was also missing documentation to verify training attained in required DC manual sections. The four remaining DE training files examined were complete.
A subsequent sampling review of other DE personnel training files by the Bechtel Quality Engineer did not disclose any further missing documentation. The Bechtel
,
Project QA Engineer stated that his group would perform an unscheduled audit of the PE0 training documentation next week to determine the extent of this problem. Since this appeared to be an administrative problem and not a technical matter, the inspector identified this as URI 425/88-34-01, Missing PE0
'
Training Documentation.
Discussions were conducted with PE0 engineers concerning controls employed in performing the above calculations relative to design inputs, criteria used, review, approval, and home office interface,
,
if applicable.
Based on the above discussions, review of design procedures and criteria utilized, and examination of typical steel platform, concrete wall, HVAC, pipe stress, and support analyses conducted, the inspector concluded that the C/S/A, Mechanical, and W-VSAMU DE groups were performing their onsite degn functions in accordance with their FSAR commitments and NRC requirements.
,
(2) Field Design Changes The inspector examined three FCRs, C-FCRB-23450 (ATCW-CF27-132),
C-FCRB-23452 ( ATCW-CF27-133), and M-FCRB-4070 ( ATCW-MF075-062),
'
that were recently reviewed by the PCO and were granted authoriza-tion for work to continue.
These FCRs were in the process of review by the C/S Building group but had not yet received the Project Engineer's approval. The reason for the subject change, its impact on original design and other disciplines, and potential need for drawing changes were discussed with the C/S Building engineer involved.
The inspector concluded that theso FCRs qualified as ATCW type design changes and that they were being properly handled in accordance with the licensee's procedures, d.
Control of Drawings The inspector conducted discussions with personnel responsible for the control and distribution of drawings, FCRs, and DCNs.
The inspector examined recent DCC internal audit reports for audits conducted on: controlled drawing stick files located in the PE0 (dated May 5, 1088),
Cleveland Consolidated Company (dated February 23, 1988), and GPC Civil Department (dated March 17,1988).
__- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
-
,
A few drawing discrepancies identified by the DCC auditor were subsequently corrected and all drawing locations examined were rated commendable (better than satisfactory).
,
The inspector randomly selected controlled drawings located in the W-VSAMU, C/S, and Mechanical group areas to verify that current revisions were posted.
Drawings, FCRs, and DCNs examined at the above
.
'
control stations included:
Location Drawing No. & Revision Applicable Changes W-VSAMV 2K4-1208-488-03, R6 M-FCRB-18329, 18323
,
2K4-1213-048-01, R2 DCN #2
,
2K4-1208-020-02, R5 None i
'
2X4DB257-1, R2 None
[
2X4DB261-6, R1 DCN #2
!
2F4-1222-051-01, R2 DCN #1
,
j 2F7-1227-025-01, R2 DCN #1
.
!
2F7-2401-077-01, R3 None 2X50Y11741-A, R1 None y
i 2X50Y11830-A, R1 None 2X50Y41321-A, RO Y-FCRB-6917 I
I C/S AX2008C079,R11 C-FCRB-22257, 22733, 22801, 22977,
,
,
23239, 23248, 23277,
,
)
23296, 23395
'
'
AX2008C091, R9 None l
AX2008C110, R4 C-FCRB-22401 j
'
AX2008C080, R11 C-FCRB-10811; M-FCRB-4969 f
I 2X2001C001, R6 C-FCRB-20400 l
Mechanical 2K3-1204-005-03, R5 M-FCRB-7701F,
7590F; DCN #3, 4, 5, and 6
,
_ _. _., _ _. _. _., _ _.. _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _ _. - _ _ _.. _ _.. - -. - _
_
.
.
.
,
2K3-1204-006-01, R19 None 2J3-1204-054-03, R1 DCN #2 2J3-1418-009-02. R1 OCN #1,2 2J5-1418-021-01, R1 OCN #1 2K7-1418-050-01, R7 None
[
2K2-1418-060-02, R9 M-FCRB-15351
,
This review identified one discrepancy concerning Drawing
'
No. 2K4-1208-02-02 located in the W-VSAMU area.
Revision 5 dated
-
January 1988 is the current revision, but the W-VSAMU stick file had Revision 4 with DCN Nos. 5 and 6 attached. There were no hardware or technically related concerns involved with this discrepancy since Revision 5 was issued to incorporate DCNs 5 and 6.
A violation is not appropriate since the matter appears to be an isolated incident of no safety concern.
e.
Design Control Reviews by the Licensee The inspector interviewed BPC and GPC auditors who were responsible for surveillance / audits of on-site design activities to determine the following:
That they were aware of each organization who prepares and/or issues design documents.
That audits /surveillances are being performed on contractors to verify proper control of design documents and records.
Audits were performed on the PEO.
The inspector examined two BPC QA audits of PE0 design activities (PA-4 dated February 15-22, 1988, and PA-6 dated March 21-31, 1988)
and one GPC QA audit of Drawing /Occument Control (CP02-88/02) to verify that:
The audited organization received a copy of the audit report.
Appropriate standards were referenced for measuring performance.
That auditors were selected in accordance with QA Manual procedures.
That adverse findings were examined for significance, received effective corrective action, and reaudits were scheduled as necessary.
With this area, no violations or deviations were identifie r
.
.
..
,
3.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on June 16, 1988, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1.
The inspectors described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection results listed below.
Proprietary information is not contained in this report.
Dissenting comments were not received from the licensee.
Item Number Description and Reference 425/88-34-01 URI-Missing PE0 training documentation, paragraph 2.c.(1).
4.
Acronyms and Initialisms ANSI -
American National Standards Institute ASME -
American Societ.t ^f Mechanical Engineers ATCW -
Authorization t) Continue Work Bechtel Power Corporation BPC
-
BWPC -
Bechtel Western Power Corporation Change Control Package CCP
-
C/S/A-Civil / Structural / Architectural Design Criteria DC
-
Document Control Center DCC
-
Design Change Notice DCN
-
Design Engineering DE
-
Field Change Request FCR
-
Georgia Power Company GPC
-
Home Office Engineering HOE
-
HVAC -
Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning IDCN -
Interim Design Change Notice Installation Engineering IE
-
NSSS -
Nuclear Steam System Supplier Project Construction Organization PC0
-
Project Engineering Organization PE0
-
Project Field Engineering PFE
-
Project Reference Manual PRM
-
Quality Assurance QA
-
Revision Rav
-
Safety Analysis Report SAR
-
Southern Company Service SCS
-
Safety Injection System SIS
-
VEGP -
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unresolved Item URI
-
-
@-VSAMU-Westinghouse-VogtleStructuralAnalysisMobileUnit