IR 05000395/1993031
| ML20058P510 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1993 |
| From: | Baldwin R, Lawyer L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058P496 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-395-93-31, NUDOCS 9312270165 | |
| Download: ML20058P510 (3) | |
Text
p y.
.
UNITED STATES L
fp nacq4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
-
,
p*,)3([4, o
REGloN ll l
-
..
S 101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W., SUITE 2900
,.
-3 49
- 'N E
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323-0199
- s Q % }t
-- g ss4je
I
!
Report No.: 50-395/93-301 Licensee: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
Columbia, S*,
29218
!
Docket No.: 50-395 License No.:
!
Facility Name:
V. C. Summer Nuclear Station
,
Examination Conducted: November 19, 1993
"'
Chief Examiner:
'
Richard S. Baldwin Date Signed
%O l
Approved By:
Y Lawrence L. Lawyer, Chief Date Signed i
Operator Licensing Section 1'
Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
,
SUMMARY
.
Scope:
An NRC examiner conducted regular, announced operator licensing requalification retake examinations on November 19, 1993. The
!
examiner administered examinations under the guidelines of the Examiner Standards (ES), NUREG-1021, Revision 7.
Two Senior
Reactor Operators (SR0s) received a walk-through' examination.
l Results:
Operator Pass / Fail:
SR0 R0 Total Percent Crews Percent
Pass
0
100%
N/A N/A Fail
0
0%
N/A N/A
-
There was no requalification program evaluation made due to the small sample
'
size of operators.
- No violations or deviations were identified.
)
.
9312270165 931203 PDR ADOCK 05000395 i
V pyg I
-
.,
..
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- K. Woodward, Manager, Nuclear Training
- T. Matloz, Supervisor, Operator Training j
R. Quick, Senior Instructor Other licensee employees contacted included instructors, engineers, technicians, operators, and office personnel.
NRC Personnel i
- R. Baldwin, Examiner
- Attended exit interview 2.
Discussion a.
Scope l
An NRC examiner conducted regular, announced operator licensing
requalification retake examinations on November 19, 1993. The-examiners administered examinations under the guidelines of the j
Examiner Standards (ES), NUREG-1021, Revision 7.
Two Senior Reactor
Operators (SR0s) received a walk-through examination.
b.
Results
Both operators passed the examinations. There was no requalification
~
program evaluation made due to the ; mall sample size of operators.
c.
Proposed Examinations The propo:ad examinations met the guidelines of NUREG-1021,
.
'l Revision 7.
The licensee proposed Job Performance Measures (JPMs)
that were vritten at a level consistent with NRC requirements. These JPMs provided valid testing of an operator's ability to demonstrate
'
kruiedge of plant systems and procedures. The NRC revised one JPM in order to accomplish the task using an alternate path. The proposed i
JPMs delineated some steps as critical that had.no measurable
performance standard. These steps required only verification of an
.,
indication without a measurable action. The examination team modified'
'
these steps to noncritical.
j d.
Administration
-]
During the performance of the in-plant JPMs, the plant-experienced a problem in the reactor trip breakers. The NRC modified the examination to delete a reactor trip breaker JPM and to substitute an-
additional simulator JPM for one of the operators.
i
,
, - -. - _. -
,
,.
.
l
.
l-Report Details-
L.
'
3.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site visit, the examiners met with representa-tives of the plant staff listed in paragraph 1 to discuss the results of the examinations. The licensee did not. identify as proprietary any material.provided to, or reviewed by the examiners. Dissenting comments-
were not received from the licensee.
,
.i
+.
.,
,
1l'
i i
..
l I
i l
$
l
..
l l
l
.-