IR 05000370/1981007
| ML19350E859 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1981 |
| From: | Conlon T, Gibbons T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350E855 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-370-81-07, 50-370-81-7, NUDOCS 8106230592 | |
| Download: ML19350E859 (4) | |
Text
~
_..
. -,,._
,
.
9 "eQ
~
jo, UNITE 3 STATES
,
',
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.
.h
}
REGION 11
%,
j*[
' o, 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., sulTE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
.....
,
Ll Report No. 50-370/81-07 Licensee: Duke oower Company
<
422 S. Church Street Charlotte, NC 23242 Facility Name: McGuire Occket No. 50-370 License No. CPPR-84 Inspection at Mc irs site near Charlotte, NC
,
2.5!8 /
Inspector:
,u/
T. D. Giboons Cate 5'igned Approved by: LM b tW fo7 C/14/F/
T(/E. Conlon, lection Chief 70 ate Signed E,ngineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspected on April 28 - May 1,1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 27 inspector-hours onsite in the i
areas of independent inspection, electrical cable and termination records review, instrumentation cable and terminations quality records review, instrumentation components and systems work and work activitie;, and electrical components and
'
systems work and work activities.
Results Of the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
%
$106230
- - -
m9
,
,
,
.
.
-
,
k[
REPORT DETAILS
- 1.
Persons Contacted LicenseeEmdloyees s
- J. C. Regers, f roject Manager:
"J. W. Willis, Project QA Engineer -
- E. B. Miller, Senior QA Engineer
.
NRC Resident Inspector
- M. J. Graham
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 1,1981 with those persons -indicated in paragraph 1 above.
' 3.~
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
-
.,
'4 Unresolved Items
.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent-Inspection Effort The inspector examined the construction work in the control room, cable spreading room, and the auxiliary building.
The inspector identified an Inspector Followup Item (370/81-07-01) Control of smoking materials and polyurethane cads in the control _ room.
The licensee has no procedures -
controlling these i tems.
The inspector found cigarette butts in four instrumentation panels and in the main control board.
A polyurethane pad was found in the main control panel. The licensee shif t supervisor was informed of the inspector's concern over the possible fi e hazard.
This iten -is.not a safety-related concern. The licensee has agreed verbally to evaluate this item.
i
~ The-inspector. observed several cases of instruments that were removed without protecting the sensing lines.and instruments used as material
' suoports. The licensee took immediate corrective action.
The cefective
- cadweld on a ground bus was identified. These items are being handled by
'
the licensee on corrective action notice R2As, I45, E190, and E191.
Within the areas examined there were no viotations identified.
+
"r
-
we r
v--
r use v we er i'w=vw-i er -v'
--w'
v w
~ver=Tu g
w-+-
wvTc-
5 m-f-'*~r
-
- _
_
..
-
g.
6, Instrumentation (Components and Systems) - Observation of Work and Work Activities
'The inspector selected three pressure. switches: 2LTPS5560,-2LTPS5570, and 2LTPS5580 for examination. The switches were examined to ' assure that ' the -
SAR and QAM requirements were complied with in the areas of identification, support, protection, inspection and nonconformance control.
Within the areas examined there were no' violations identified.
7.
Inspector Followup Item The inspector identified three cables which had damage to the outer jacket.
The licensee has identified the item on a R2A form E191.
The licensee stated that the item would be corrected but since no credit is taken for the jacket they are not required to reoair any jacket damage. The licensee has written no-procedure for the jacket repairs. This is an Inspector Followup l
Item 370/81-07-02 " Procedure for Cable Jacket repairs," This item will remain open until an evaluation of this issue is made.
!
.8.
Electrical (Cables and Terminations) - Review of Quality Records-The inspector selected thirteen cables for a quality records review.
The-cables selected are listed as follows: 2*RN665, 2*RN666, 2*RN667, 2*RN658-2*RN669, 2*RN670, 2*RN671, 2*RN672, 2*NI521, 2*NI522, 2*EPL507, 2*EPL508, and 2*EPL509.
The records were examined to assure that the SAR and QAM.
requirements were complied with_in the areas of receipt inspection, material certification, installation, size, type of cable, location, routing, l
identification, cable pulling records, terminations, and raceway supports.
The irspector examined 10 nonconformance reports to. assure they were prnperly reviewed and retrievable. The corrective actions included present status and nonrecurrence actions.
l~
Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.
9.
Instrumentation (Cables and Terminations) - Review of Quality Records The inspector selected twenty-six safety related instrument cables as
.follows:
2*EIA517, 2*EIA518, 2*EIA519, 2*EIA520, 2*EIA521, 2*EIA522, 2*FW542, 2*Pd543, 2*FW544, 2*RN565, 2*RN567, 2*EN572, 2*RN574, 2*RN573, l
2*RN584, 2*RN596, 2*SM576,. 2*SM578, 2%M580, 2*SM581, 2*NV541, 2*CA658, i
2*CA697, 2*CA699, 2*CA700, and 2*KC574
,
!.
The-records were examined to assure that the SAR and CAM recuirements were complied with in the areas of recei,ing inspection, material ertification, size'and type of cable, location, routing, identification, cable pulling, terminat'ons, and nonconformance control.
,
Within the areas examined no viciations were identifie.
,
,O
10.
Electrical (Components and Systems II) - Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector selected containment ventilation fan 2VX532 for examination to assure that the 3AR and QAM requirements were complied with in the areas of receipt inspection, identi fication, installation procedure inspection, protection, cleanliness, location separation, redundancy, procedure revision control and nonconformance control.
Within the areas examined, there were no violations identified.
.
.
i