IR 05000361/1979031
| ML19296B164 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1980 |
| From: | Faulkenberry B, Andrea Johnson, Miller L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19296B161 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-79-31, NUDOCS 8002200195 | |
| Download: ML19296B164 (3) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMEhT
REGION V
Report No.
50-361 CPPR-97 Safeguards croup Docket No.
ticens, 30, Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company P. O. Box 800, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Facility Narre:
San Onofre Unit 2 San Diego County, California Inspection at:
October 29-30 and flovember 27, 1979 Inspection conducted:
//'
- db e., /
/ !? /0 r-Inspectors:
-
A. D. Johnson, Reactor Inspector Date Signed
/E/ l$b w fCv
) f7 /d L. Miller, Reactor Inspector Date Signed t
Date Signed
/
.
7_f __
/
b Approved By:
'
-
-
B. Faulkenberry, Chief, Reactor Project Section 2 Date Signed s
Reactor Operations a{.d fluclear Support Branch Surma ry :
Inspection on October 29-30 and riovember 27,1979 (Report flo.
50-361/79-31)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee's pre-operational test program and procedures and independent inspection effort. The inspection involved 20 inspector-hours onsite by two ilRC inspectors.
Resul ts: flo items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
RV Forrn 719 (?)
'
800gggg
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted a.
Southern California Edison Company
- H. Ray, Project Manager
- G. Chavez, Project Startup Manager P. Portanova, Startup Test Operations Supervisor G. Morgan, Operations Superintendent
- D. Nunn, Quality Assurance Manager
- P. Croy, Site Project QA Supervisor
- P. Belhumeur, Startup QA Supervisor
- R. Horton, QA Engineer K. Johnson, Startup Engineer b.
Bechtel Corporation
- K. Hess, Startup Project Engineering Supervisor R. Whitworth, Assistant Startup Project Engineering Supervisor
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Preoperational Test Program and Procedures The inspector examined the status of the preoperational test program and the procedures to be used to perform the scheduled preoperational tests.
To date none of the draft procedures had received final approval.
The first preoperational tests were expected to be performed during February 1980.
The inspector examined draf t procedure 2-PE-44d01,125 VDC Power System and called licensee representatives' attention to repre-sentations in the FSAR that appeared to be inadequately addressed in the test procedure. The licensee representatives acknowledged the inspectors' comments on the draft procedure and indicated that resolution of the items would be made in the final procedur.
3.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives identified in Paragraph 1 to discuss the scope and findings of the inspection and to inform the licensee of the IE Region V position with respect to NRC requirements for management control (QA) during preoperation testing of plant systems. The NRC representative stated that for the IE Region V inspection staff to be able to confirm that the nuclear olant had been substantially constructed in accordance with the description provided in the application for an operating license, as a minimum, all identified safety-related systems and components, and all systems and components that have an effect on the safety of plant operations, will be expected to be tested pursuant to a management control program (QA) designed to assure proper performance dur-ing plant operations. The inspectors indicated that the systems and com-ponents mentioned in Regulatory Guides 1.68 and 1.33 would clearly fall within the requirements as understood by the IE Region V staff.
The project manager indicated that his interpretation of the requirements differed from that of the NRC representatives, but that SCE would adjust the management control program to comply with the inspectors' interpretations.