IR 05000361/1979018
| ML13309A742 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1979 |
| From: | Dodds R, Eckhardt J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13309A741 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-79-18, 50-362-79-18, NUDOCS 7909200049 | |
| Download: ML13309A742 (3) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION V
50-361/79-18 Report N /79-18 50-361 CPPR-97 Docket N License N CPPR-98 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company P. 0. Box 800, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Facility Name:
San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Inspection at:
Construction Site, San Diego County, California Inspection conducted: June 26-29, 1979 Inspectors:
ILI J. H. Eckhardt, Reactr) Inspector Dat Signed Date Signed Date Signed Approved By:
2
/.- Dodds, Chief, Engineering Support Section, Reactor DatA Signed Construction and Engineering Support Branch Summary:
Inspection on June 26-29, 1979 (Report Nos. 50-361/79-18 and 50-362/79-18)
Areas Inspected:
Routine unannounced inspection by regional based inspector of construction activities involving licensee's actions on previous inspection findings, containment post tensioning system, and pipe installation and weldin The inspection involved 25 inspector hours onsite by one NRC inspecto Results: Of the three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identifie RV Form 219 (2)
11920
DETAILS 1. Individual Contacted a. Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
- H. B. Ray, Project Manager
- D. E. Nunn, Manager, Quality Assurance
- P. A. Croy, Site Quality Assurance/Quality Control Supervisor
- R. R. Hart, Construction Superintendent
- P. R. King, Quality Assurance Engineer D. Schone, Engineering Site Representative -
Civil J. J. Panteleo, Quality Assurance Engineer M. Rodin, Quality Assurance Engineer b. Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel)
- C. A. Blum, Quality Control Manager
- W. D. Nichols, Assistant Project Field Engineer
- L. W. Hurst
- A. L. Erickson, Project Field Quality Control Engineer c. VSL C. A. Grosvenor, Field Inspector J. V. Bond, Superintendent
- Denotes those attending exit intervie. Containment Post-Tensioning System (Unit 3)
Tensioning of Unit 3 horizontal tendon number 75 from buttress 2 to 3 was observed. The VSL tensioning procedure was being properly followed and appropriate tensioning data recorded. In addition, material records for two batches of sheathing filler material (grease) were reviewe This material was Visconorust 2090-P4 Casing Filler Material and was used in previously tensioned Unit 3 vertical tendon The records included chemical and physical test results and agreed with the requirements of the appropriate ASTM Standard No deviations or items of noncompliance were identifie.
Pipe Installation and Welding Piping installation and field welding activities were examined for eight pipe spools and seven welds to ascertain compliance with the appropriate ASME and AWS code requirements. The piping installation and welding was in various stages of completion as listed below:
-2 Unit 3 Field Weld Pipe Number Pipe dia., i Weld Status Spool S3-SI-045-4 F
Complete Spool S3-SI-045-3 E
Complete Spool S3-SI-087-6 BB
Complete Spool S3-CC-287-2 E
Complet Spool S3-CC-287-3 Unit 2 Field Weld Pipe Number Pipe dia., in. Weld Status Spool S2-RC-017-38 EE
Complete Line S2-1201-ML-072 K
Fitup in Progress Line S2-1201-ML-060 B
Tack Welded The inprogress work appeared satisfactory, appropriate records were being kept, and inspections being performed. Also, the field welding check lists, filler metal withdrawal records and NDE examination reports for weld F of line S3-1204-ML-045 and weld B of line S3-1204-ML-087 were reviewe The quality records for the five Unit 3 pipe spools listed above were reviewed. These records included Bechtel receipt inspections, Pullman Power Products material certifications and the records for 24 shop welds, including rod withdrawal, welding checklist, and NDE. The radiographs required for four of the welds were examine No deviations or items of noncompliance were identifie. Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)
at the conclusion of the inspection on June 29,. 1979, and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection as stated in-this report. This exit interview was held in conjunction with the NRC Resident Inspector's regularly scheduled weekly meeting.