IR 05000346/2025010

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Report 05000346/2025010
ML25163A132
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse 
Issue date: 06/16/2025
From: Sanchez-Santiago E
NRC/RGN-III/DORS/RPB2
To: Tony Brown
Vistra Operations Company
References
IR 2025010
Download: ML25163A132 (1)


Text

SUBJECT:

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - BIENNIAL PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORT 05000346/2025010

Dear Terry Brown:

On May 8, 2025, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a problem identification and resolution inspection at your Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station and discussed the results of this inspection with you and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.

The NRC inspection team reviewed the stations problem identification and resolution program to confirm that the station was complying with NRC regulations and licensee standards. Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that your program complies with NRC regulations and applicable industry standards such that the Reactor Oversight process can continue to be implemented.

The team also evaluated the stations effectiveness in identifying, prioritizing, evaluating, and correcting problems, reviewed licensee audits and self-assessments, and its use of industry and NRC operating experience information. The results of these evaluations are in the enclosure.

Finally, the team reviewed the stations programs to establish and maintain a safety-conscious work environment and interviewed station personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs. Based on the teams observations and the results of these interviews, the team found no evidence of challenges to your organizations safety-conscious work environment. Your employees appeared willing to raise nuclear safety concerns through at least one of the several means available.

One finding of very low safety significance (Green) is documented in this report. This finding did not involve a violation of NRC requirements.

If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment or a finding not associated with a regulatory requirement in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the June 16, 2025 Regional Administrator, Region III; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.

This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely, Elba M. Sanchez Santiago, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Operating Reactor Safety Docket No. 05000346 License No. NPF-3

Enclosure:

As stated

Inspection Report

Docket Number:

05000346

License Number:

NPF-3

Report Number:

05000346/2025010

Enterprise Identifier:

I-2025-010-0000

Licensee:

Vistra Operations Company, LLC

Facility:

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

Location:

Oak Harbor, OH

Inspection Dates:

April 21, 2025 to May 08, 2025

Inspectors:

R. Cassara, Senior Resident Inspector

R. Ng, Senior Project Engineer

J. Robb, Operations Engineer

Approved By:

Elba M. Sanchez Santiago, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 2

Division of Operating Reactor Safety

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring the licensees performance by conducting a biennial problem identification and resolution inspection at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information.

List of Findings and Violations

Failure to Perform an Operability Evaluation Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Aspect Report Section Barrier Integrity Green FIN 05000346/2025010-01 Open/Closed

[P.2] -

Evaluation 71152B The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance (green) for the licensees failure to perform an operability evaluation in accordance with procedure NORM-OP-1009,

SRO Review of Condition Reports. Specifically, the licensee incorrectly determined that exceeding the core lift criteria did not have a functional impact on the SSC because they believed that the suspected cause of the flow calculation changes was due to temperature inputs to the calculations drifting. The licensee did not perform an operability determination to evaluate the impact of the temperature drift to the calculation methodology for both the core lift and the departure of nucleate boiling (DNB) safety analysis.

Additional Tracking Items

None.

INSPECTION SCOPES

Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.

OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE

71152B - Problem Identification and Resolution Biennial Team Inspection (IP Section 03.04)

(1) The inspectors performed a biennial assessment of the effectiveness of the licensees Problem Identification and Resolution program, use of operating experience, self-assessments and audits, and safety conscious work environment.
  • Problem Identification and Resolution Effectiveness: The inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the licensees Problem Identification and Resolution program in identifying, prioritizing, evaluating, and correcting problems. The inspectors also conducted a five-year review of the reactor coolant pump issues. The inspectors also reviewed the corrective actions for selected NRC non-cited violations and findings.
  • Operating Experience: The inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the licensees processes for use of operating experience.
  • Self-Assessments and Audits: The inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the licensees identification and correction of problems identified through audits and self-assessments.
  • Safety Conscious Work Environment: The inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the stations programs to establish and maintain a safety-conscious work environment.

INSPECTION RESULTS

Assessment 71152B Assessment of the Corrective Action Program Based on the samples reviewed, the inspectors concluded the licensee's implementation of the Corrective Action Program (CAP) was generally effective and supported nuclear safety.

Effectiveness of Problem Identification:

Based on the samples reviewed, the inspectors determined that the licensee continued to identify issues at a low threshold and appropriately entered these issues into the CAP. The inspectors also determined the licensee usually entered problems into the CAP, timely, completely and accurately. The inspectors observed that issues were being identified by all levels of organization and with varying degrees of safety, security, or radiological significance.

Some deficiencies were identified by external organizations, including the NRC, and they were subsequently entered into the CAP for resolution. The licensee also utilized a number of CAP support processes to identify problems, including the self-assessment and audit processes and the Operating Experience (OE) Program. For example, the inspectors noted that the licensee periodically performed departmental self-assessments and Nuclear Oversight audits to identify issues in station programs and processes. The identified deficiencies and improvement opportunities were entered into the CAP for resolution.

Similarly, the licensee screened issues from both the NRC and from industry OE programs and entered them into the CAP for evaluation when they were applicable to the station. The inspectors determined the licensee was generally effective at trending low-level issues and taking appropriate corrective actions to prevent more significant problems from developing. In addition, the licensee had conducted effectiveness reviews and used the CAP to document instances in which previous corrective actions were ineffective or were inappropriately closed.

The Inspectors performed a review of the reactor coolant pump issues over the last 5 years. The inspectors focused on any potential recurring or age-related issues that were not identified by the licensee. As part of this review, the inspectors reviewed selected corrective action program documents, and interviewed the system engineer. The inspectors concluded that deficiencies and concerns were identified and entered into the CAP at a low threshold.

Issues with the pumps were characterized and addressed appropriately. The inspectors did not identify any programmatic deficiencies in this area.

Effectiveness of Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues:

Based on the samples reviewed, the inspectors determined that licensee performance was generally effective at prioritizing and evaluating issues commensurate with the safety, security or radiological significance of the identified problem. The licensee utilized a multi-discipline team consisting of department directors and managers to review the condition report categorization, evaluation method selection, and other actions would adequately address the causes and extent of condition when applicable. Upon completion of the evaluation or actions, the Corrective Action Review Board reviewed those products to ensure they met the CAP requirements. During the Management Review Board and Corrective Action Review Board meetings the inspectors observed, licensee staff were generally thorough and intrusive in reviewing issues. The inspectors also observed healthy dialogues and good interactions among the members of the respective groups. Licensee staff were prepared and challenged each other on disposition of the identified conditions. Actions were prioritized based on the safety, security or radiological significance of the issues. In general, once a degraded or non-conforming issue was identified, the CAP process was effective in directing equipment operability or functionality reviews. The inspectors did identify an issue related to an operability review, which was documented in the Results Section of this report.

Effectiveness of Corrective Actions:

Based on the samples reviewed, the inspectors determined the licensee was generally effective in corrective action implementation. In general, corrective actions for deficiencies that were safety, security or radiological significant were tracked to completion in a timely manner. Problems requiring the performance of a causal evaluation were resolved in accordance with CAP requirements. The inspectors sampled assignments associated with violations that were identified by the NRC previously and those associated with various significances. The inspectors determined that the corrective actions sampled were generally effective and timely and addressed the adverse conditions.

Assessment 71152B The Use of Operating Experience Based on the samples reviewed, the team determined that the licensees performance in the use of operating experience (OE) was generally effective. The licensee screened industry and NRC OE information for applicability to the station. When applicable, condition reports were written, and actions were developed and implemented to prevent similar issues from occurring. Operating experience lessons learned were communicated and incorporated into plant operations. The inspectors observed OE information being used in daily activities, such as pre-job briefs, as well as issue reviews and investigations. The licensee is also cognizant on generating OE lesson learned from issues encountered in the plant. The inspectors did not identify any issue of significance in this area.

Assessment 71152B Self-Assessments and Audits Based on the samples reviewed, the inspectors determined that the licensees performance of self-assessments and audits was generally effective. The licensee performed department self-assessments and Quality Assurance audits throughout the organization on a periodic basis. These self-assessments and audits were generally effective at identifying issues and enhancement opportunities at an appropriate threshold. The self-assessments and audits reviewed by the inspectors identified issues that were not previously known, including issues regarding the CAP itself. Those issues were generally captured, and actions were generally taken by the licensee through the CAP for resolution. The inspectors did not identify any issue of significance in this area.

Assessment 71152B Safety Conscious Work Environment The inspectors reviewed the results of the Davis-Besse safety culture survey that was conducted in November 2024. The inspectors noted the survey documented negative staff responses regarding the Employee Concerns Program (ECP). The inspectors also noted that there was a high number of negative responses in several departments regarding confidence in the CAP to prioritize, investigate, and resolve issues. As a result, the inspectors reviewed licensee actions to address the negative survey trends. The inspectors also performed individual interviews of a representative cross-section of licensee personnel, including individual contributors, supervisors and contractors from various departments. The inspectors also interviewed the ECP manager and reviewed selected ECP case files. A total of 23 licensee personnel were interviewed during this inspection.

Based on the interviews and a review of licensee actions, the inspectors determined licensee personnel believed that they could raise nuclear safety, security or radiological issues through multiple channels including ECP without fear of retaliation. Licensee staff also believe that the CAP effectively addresses issues important to nuclear safety. However, some licensee staff have expressed frustration with the CAP process on resolving low-level issues partly because they are not aware of all the considerations and constrains going into the decisions. Similarly, several licensee staff members were not fully aware of the ECP or how they could utilize the program. The inspectors determined that the ongoing licensee efforts to improve communications should address these negative responses. The inspectors found no evidence of challenges to the safety conscious work environment at Davis-Besse.

Failure to Perform an Operability Evaluation Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Aspect Report Section Barrier Integrity Green FIN 05000346/2025010-01 Open/Closed

[P.2] -

Evaluation 71152B The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance (green) for the licensee's failure to perform an operability evaluation in accordance with procedure NORM-OP-1009, SRO Review of Condition Reports. Specifically, the licensee incorrectly determined that exceeding the core lift criteria did not have a functional impact on the SSC because they believed that the suspected cause of the flow calculation changes was due to temperature inputs to the calculations drifting. The licensee did not perform an operability determination to evaluate the impact of the temperature drift to the calculation methodology for both the core lift and the departure of nucleate boiling (DNB) safety analysis.

Description:

In May 2022, the licensee identified an increasing trend in RCS flow rate calculated per DB-SP-03358, RCS Flow Rate Test. This reactor coolant system (RCS) flow rate test is a Technical Specification (TS) surveillance that is required to be performed every 18 months.

The purpose of the surveillance was to verify the TS minimum RCS flow limit rate limit.

Additionally, it serves to verify the core lift analysis maximum RCS flow rate limit, which is not a TS controlled parameter. The method used is to perform a secondary side heat balance to calculate the RCS flow rate. The surveillance is also used to verify that plant RCS flow instruments are within acceptable tolerance for other TS surveillances. The TS minimum flow rate limit is to ensure that the initial condition assumed in the safety analysis for DNB is maintained. Although the core lift criteria is not a TS limit, it precludes the fuel assembly liftoff during postulated Condition I and Condition II events. Conditional I events are normal operations such as startup, shutdown or refueling. Condition II events are plant transients such as loss of feedwater or control rod drop. These flow limits protect the fuel rod fission product barrier. At the time the trend was identified, both acceptance criteria were satisfied but the licensee implemented a number of actions to investigate the increasing trend.

In April 2024, during the next surveillance, the RCS flow rate calculated from one of the two channels exceeded the core lift analysis maximum RCS flow limit. The licensee initiated condition report CR-2024-2942 for this condition. Per procedure NORM-OP-1009, SRO Review of Condition Reports, states that Entry into the Operability Determination (OD)process is contingent upon the Deficient Condition satisfying the Three Required Entry Criteria (TRC). The licensee at the time determined that Criterion 1, Does the deficient condition affect a TS SSC installed in an operating unit? was met. The licensee determined that Criteria 2, Does the deficient condition have a functional impact on the SSC? This includes the ability to perform required functions under postulated, off-normal design conditions was not met because the licensee believed there was reasonable assurance that the core lift analysis was met and therefore, the RCS and fuel would continue to perform their functions. This was based on the RCS radiochemistry and no indications of fuel defects or fuel failure and diverse indication of acceptable flow. As such, Criterion 3, Is the functional impact of the deficient condition substantive? did not need to be answered. Therefore, the licensee did not perform an operability determination.

In May 2025, the inspectors reviewed the condition report associated with this issue. Based on the review, the inspectors determined that exceeding the core lift criteria had a functional impact on the fuel assembly during postulated, off-normal design conditions. Specifically, given that the licensee believed at the time that the suspected cause of the flow calculation changes was due to temperature inputs to the calculations drifting, the inspectors determined that the impact to the calculation methodology was not evaluated and could impact both the core lift and the DNB safety analyses. The inspectors concluded that both Criterion 2 and 3 should have been answered yes and an operability determination be performed.

Corrective Actions: The licensee entered this issue into the CAP and plans to revise the core lift analysis to address the issue.

Corrective Action References: CR-2025-03538, Inadequate Detail in CR-2024-04075 to Capture Basis for Meeting Technical Specification Requirements

Performance Assessment:

Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that the failure to perform an operability evaluation in accordance with NORM-OP-1009 was a performance deficiency that was reasonably within the licensees ability to foresee and correct and should have been prevented. Specifically, the licensee incorrectly determined that exceeding the core lift criteria did not have a functional impact on the SSC because they believed that the suspected cause of the flow calculation changes was due to temperature inputs to the calculations drifting.

However, the impact from the temperature drift to the calculation methodology was not evaluated and could impact both the core lift and the DNB safety analyses.

Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because it was associated with the SSC and Barrier Performance attribute of the Barrier Integrity cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to provide reasonable assurance that physical design barriers protect the public from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. Specifically, since the same calculation is used to verify both the maximum core lift analysis limit and the minimum RCS flow limit, the licensee did not thoroughly evaluate the impact to both safety analysis methodology, which is directly related to the fuel barrier performance.

Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power. The inspectors screened the issue to Green because the inspectors answered all the Fuel Cladding Integrity questions in IMC 0609 Exhibit 3 - Barrier Integrity Screening Questions no.

Cross-Cutting Aspect: P.2 - Evaluation: The organization thoroughly evaluates issues to ensure that resolutions address causes and extent of conditions commensurate with their safety significance. Specifically, the licensee did not thoroughly evaluate the cause of the RCS flow exceeding the core lift limit and therefore, did not consider the full impact to the calculation methodology of both safety analysis limits.

Enforcement:

Inspectors did not identify a violation of regulatory requirements associated with this finding.

EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS

The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.

  • On May 8, 2025, the inspectors presented the biennial problem identification and resolution inspection results to Terry Brown and other members of the licensee staff.

DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

ATA-2023-2857

NRC Cyber Security Inspection IP71130.10 Self-Assessment

2/13/2023

CR-2017-11317

Cyber Security Program: Control Deficiencies

11/17/2017

CR-2017-11807

Cyber Security Program: Control Deficiencies

11/30/2017

CR-2018-10472

Error in the Auxiliary Building Tornado Differential Pressure

Model

11/27/2018

CR-2020-03138

Received L787 RCP 1-1 MTR LWR BRG OIL LVL High

Computer Point

04/12/2020

CR-2020-04242

System Monitoring - Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) 1-2 Seal

Cavity Pressure Trends

05/14/2020

CR-2021-02678

21 Cyber Inspection: Untimely Implementation of

CA-2017-11807-001

04/08/2021

CR-2021-04888

Cyber: Implement the New Baseline Configuration Auditing

Requirements of NOBP-SS-1205, Cyber Security

Configuration Control

06/23/2021

CR-2021-05292

RCP 1-2 Third Stage Cavity Pressure Reading Lower than

Normal

07/10/2021

CR-2021-07196

Rising Trend RCP 1-2 Drinking Bird Counts

09/25/2021

CR-2021-08974

Service Water Baseline Test Engineering Review

DB-PF-03216

11/24/2021

CR-2021-09282

NRC TI inspection: DB-OP-06313 Procedure Enhancement

Observation for Open Phase Condition

2/07/2021

CR-2022-00817

HPI Train 1 Pressure Rising Following MU Valve Stroke

2/03/2022

CR-2022-03833

Increasing Trend for Reactor Coolant System Flow Rate

Calculated per DB-SP-03358, RCS Flow Rate Test

05/04/2022

CR-2022-09409

RCP Motor Oil Drain Tank Level High

2/11/2022

CR-2022-09426

22 NRC Radiation Protection Baseline Inspection: NRC

Identified Tritium Sampling Basis Methodology Was Not

Determined

2/12/2022

CR-2022-09681

RCP 1-2 Third Stage Seal Downward Pressure Trend and

Elevated Seal Leakage Rate

2/21/2022

71152B

Corrective Action

Documents

CR-2023-02245

Performance Gap Analysis Requested for Instrument and

Control Maintenance Regarding Nuclear Instrument

03/24/2023

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

Maintenance

CR-2023-02453

23 Security Training Inspection, NRC Finding

03/30/2023

CR-2023-02623

Zip Drive Disk Discovered at PAF Entrance Area

04/04/2023

CR-2023-02948

Conditions outside of Original Design Tolerance Identified

While Mapping the Cooling Tower

04/12/2023

CR-2023-03338

Ground Settling Aggregate Review Enhancements

04/21/2023

CR-2023-03771

MS-C-23-08-20: Prep - Utilization of a Cancelled Documents

by Access Authorization

05/04/2023

CR-2023-04596

SBODG Cylinder 20 Rocker Arm Shaft Cap Broken

06/05/2023

CR-2023-04687

SBODG Extended Unavailability Time due to Low Fuel Oil

Level

06/08/2023

CR-2023-04801

Call Tree Individual Did Not Respond to Unannounced

Call-In Dill

06/14/2023

CR-2023-04944

Insufficient Documentation of Evaluations for Sink

Holes/Areas of Settlement Within 15 feet of Safety-Related

Structures

06/21/2023

CR-2023-05000

Failure to address adverse condition (Fire Protection piping

misalignment) in Corrective Action Program

06/22/2023

CR-2023-05298

Trending for Self Powered Neutron Detectors

07/03/2023

CR-2023-05430

Replacement Door 458 Incorrect Size

07/11/2023

CR-2023-05666

FME: Retaining Pin Stuck Between Fuel Pins of Fuel

Assembly

07/20/2023

CR-2023-05671

SCBA-029 Failed Monthly Performance Test

07/20/2023

CR-2023-05829

RC Loop 2 Hotleg NR Temp (PPCS:T730) Appears High

07/26/2023

CR-2023-05945

Area of Concern (AOC) Issued to Davis-Besse Site

Protection due to Recent Trend of Safety and Human

Performance

07/31/2023

CR-2023-06048

MS-C-23-07-08: FINDING: M&TE Usage Not Tracked in

ATICTS

08/03/2023

CR-2023-06564

23 WANO AFI: NP.1 Workers are Not Consistently

Adhering to Human Performance Standards during Work

Activities.

08/23/2023

71152B

Corrective Action

Documents

CR-2023-06732

  1. 1 Emergency Diesel Generator (#1 EDG) Monthly Water

Jacket Iron Analysis is Trending Higher Than Typical Values.

08/29/2023

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

CR-2023-07574

RCP 1-1 Drinking Bird Counter Stopped Moving

10/07/2023

CR-2023-07667

RC Loop 2 Hot Leg NR Temp Appears High (PPCS:T730)

10/11/2023

CR-2023-07692

Degrading Seal Parameters for RCP 1-2

10/11/2023

CR-2023-07894

AFPT 2 Governor is Hunting Excessively at the HSS.

10/20/2023

CR-2023-09194

RPS Channel 1 RCS Flow Mode Configured to Incorrect

Vendor Specification

2/14/2023

CR-2024-00078

Startup Transformer Bushings are Beyond the Normal Life

Expectancy of 30 Years

01/04/2024

CR-2024-00153

Transfer of CWMT #1 to CWMT #2 during RE1770 A/B

Testing (ACE)

01/08/2024

CR-2024-00232

Individual Accessed Radiological Control Area (RCA) without

a Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD)

01/10/2024

CR-2024-00407

Adverse Trend in Human Performance Events and errors

Since November 2023 at Davis-Besse

01/16/2024

CR-2024-00824

Security Did Not Meet 1 of 2 Objectives from the Area of

Concern

2/01/2024

CR-2024-01034

MS-C-24-02-22: No Condition Report for a 10CFR21

Notification from Velan

2/08/2024

CR-2024-01052

MS-C-24-02-22: Corrective Action Response Does Not

Include Sufficient Objective Evidence for Closure as

Required by CAP

2/09/2024

CR-2024-01054

MS-C-24-02-22: Effectiveness Review ER-2023-01268-1 Is

Not Correct

2/09/2024

CR-2024-01119

Increase in Human Performance Errors Within Security

2/13/2024

CR-2024-01181

MS-C-24-02-09: PMT Leak Check Hold Time Information Not

Properly Documented and Missing Painter Initial

2/15/2024

CR-2024-01182

MS-C-24-02-09: Issues with Order 200867885

Documentation

2/15/2024

CR-2024-01340

Aggregate Review of Ground Settling/Buried Piping Leaks at

Davis-Besse

2/21/2024

CR-2024-01446

Radioactive Material Identified during Baseline Survey.

2/23/2024

CR-2024-01529

CFAM Elevation Notice - Davis-Besse Site Protection

Inconsistent Application of Security Fundamentals

2/27/2024

71152B

Corrective Action

Documents

CR-2024-02076

Unexpected Dose Rates Found during Incore Tank Survey

03/12/2024

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

CR-2024-02170

NRC Identified - Improvement Opportunity with Alpha

Monitoring

03/14/2024

CR-2024-02249

Water Accumulation in Fire Pump Diesel Day Tank

03/16/2024

CR-2024-02254

RCP 1-2 Whip Restraint SE Nuts Loose

03/16/2024

CR-2024-02338

Positive Whole Body Count on Steam Generator Worker

03/19/2024

CR-2024-02488

Integrated SFAS Test Train 1 Required Evaluation of IST

Program Document for Valve Stroke Times - 1R23

03/22/2024

CR-2024-02599

MS Line 2 to AFPT 1 Isolation Valve MS106A Tripping

Closed with SG Pressure >20PSIG

03/26/2024

CR-2024-02942

Calculated RCS Flowrate per DB-SP-03358 Exceeds Core

Tilt Limit

04/04/2024

CR-2024-03162

Fire Piping Rupture Outside the Turbine Building Near the

Tool Crib Entrance

04/11/2024

CR-2024-03180

Station Blackout Diesel Fuel Oil Day Tank Elevated

Micro-Organism

04/12/2024

CR-2024-03400

Trending: Spent Fuel Pool Leakage/SF99-Q, ZONE 2 FUEL

TRANSFER PIT FLOOR LEAK MONITOR DRAIN, Blockage

Impacts

04/18/2024

CR-2024-03413

EPZ Siren 002 Located in Jerusalem Township in Lucas

County Failed the April 17, 2024, Siren Test.

04/18/2024

CR-2024-03734

Irregular Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD) Results From

2nd Half 2023

04/26/2024

CR-2024-04083

Individual Alarms Passive Monitor Upon Issuance of Dose of

Legal Record Dosimeter

05/06/2024

CR-2024-04337

Trending Small Changes in CTRM Indications Following

CTRM Ventilation Swap.

05/14/2024

CR-2024-04787

Main Steam Line Room 1 (Room 601) Temperature

Exceeded 120 Degrees Fahrenheit

05/30/2024

CR-2024-04911

RCS Leakage Trends Not in MAOM at Time of Publishing

06/04/2024

CR-2024-05061

Level 4 Clearance Discrepancy

06/11/2024

CR-2024-05271

Surveillance Testing to Fulfill SR 3.3.1.3 Not Performed on a

Staggered Test Basis

06/20/2024

CR-2024-05297

MS-C-24-05-31: Staged Combustibles Not Addressed in Fire

Loading Calculations

06/20/2024

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

CR-2024-05444

Turbine Building North Slab Trending

06/26/2024

CR-2024-05571

Level 4 Clearance Condition

07/02/2024

CR-2024-05576

Level 4 Clearance Issue for C49 Work

07/02/2024

CR-2024-06093

RCP 1-2 Nuclear Safety Concern

07/25/2024

CR-2024-06186

Discrepancy Between Plant Drawing and Field Wiring

07/30/2024

CR-2024-06323

Level 4 Clearance Issue

08/05/2024

CR-2024-06451

NRC Identified (NRC Inspection 71130.05): CR-2021-05955-

ATA-01 Closed without Supporting Justification.

08/08/2024

CR-2024-06580

EP Drill: 8/13/24: Drill Participant Did Not Respond

08/14/2024

CR-2024-06768

Concern Identified Regarding Concurrent Yellow Risk

Surveillance Testing

08/22/2024

CR-2024-06827

Demin Water Transfer Pump 1 Trip Due to Mispositioning of

Switch

08/26/2024

CR-2024-06857

NRC Identified Fire Barrier Question

08/27/2024

CR-2024-06873

NRC Identified Fire Barrier Penetration Question

08/27/2024

CR-2024-06932

Level 4 Clearance Event - Potential Drawing Discrepancy on

E-666 Sh1

08/29/2024

CR-2024-07102

Preliminary Indications Identified Potential Rotation Issues

with Siren 504 Following Testing.

09/06/2024

CR-2024-07221

NRC Identified Concern (Protected Equipment Postings)

09/11/2024

CR-2024-07227

EPZ Siren 005 Did Not Receive the Test Signal during the

Silent Siren Test on 09/11/2024

09/11/2024

CR-2024-07386

INPO Temporary Modifications (>1 Cycle) Indicator Yellow

for August 2024

09/18/2024

CR-2024-07412

Fleet Assessment Notice of Concern - Negative Trend in

Plant Status Control, Bumping of Components

09/19/2024

CR-2024-07435

License Event Report (LER) 2021-001 Revision 01

09/19/2024

CR-2024-07563

Security Did Not Meet 1 Objective from the Area of Concern

09/25/2024

CR-2024-07800

DB Siren 002 Failure

10/04/2024

CR-2024-07935

EDG Speed Switch Evaluation Concludes an Unanalyzed

Condition Existed.

10/10/2024

CR-2024-08176

Siren 205 in Ottawa County Had a Communications Failure

during 10/18/2024 Testing.

10/18/2024

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

CR-2024-08416

Plant Status Control Event - SW37, CCW HEAT

EXCHANGER 3 OUTLET ISOLATION, Inadvertently Left

Closed During Performance of DB1OP-06262, Attachment

(ACE)

10/26/2024

CR-2024-08554

Several Telephone Lines Were Found Dead During

Walkdown/Communication Test at the Joint Information

Center Emergency Response Facility

10/31/2024

CR-2024-09019

NRC NCV: Inadequate Assessment of Fire Brigade

Performance (ACE)

11/18/2024

CR-2024-09020

NRC NCV: Reactor Protection System Flow Modules Found

Not Conforming to Design

11/18/2024

CR-2024-09356

Meteorological Tower Primary 75M Wind Speed Failed

2/04/2024

CR-2024-09424

Davis-Besse Backup 4-Way Blast Dial Server is Out of

Service

2/09/2024

CR-2024-09449

Error in Historical CCW HX 1 Performance Test

2/10/2024

CR-2024-09582

NRC NCV: Failure to Ensure Adequate Auxiliary Feedwater

Pump Minimum Flow

2/16/2024

CR-2024-09751

Primary 75-Meter Wind Direction Indicating Erratically.

2/25/2024

CR-2025-00041

Siren 103 Current Fail After 1/3/25 Audible Test

01/03/2025

CR-2025-00151

Outside Phones Lines are Out of Service

01/09/2025

CR-2025-00155

75M Wind Direction Drift from Acceptable Direction

01/09/2025

CR-2025-00727

During testing, Lucas County Emergency Operations Center

Could Not be Contacted From the Emergency Operations

Facility 4-Way Phone

2/04/2025

CR-2025-00888

Annunciator 6-1-B Failed to Flash during Annunciator Panel

Testing

2/10/2025

CR-2025-00917

Unsatisfactory Simulator DEP Classification

2/11/2025

CR-2025-00934

Davis-Besse 2024 Safety Conscious Work Environment

Survey Chemistry Red Pillars

2/12/2025

CR-2025-00936

Davis-Besse 2024 Safety Conscious Work Environment

Survey Security Red Pillar

2/12/2025

CR-2025-00939

IIS: As-Found Condition of T86-4 and DA1144 Penetration

2/12/2025

CR-2025-00992

EDG Air Start Tank T86-4 Relief Concern

2/13/2025

71152B

Corrective Action

Documents

CR-2025-01139

Draft Tornado dP Calculation Results

2/20/2025

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

CR-2025-01226

Davis-Besse 2024 Safety Conscious Work Environment

Survey Other Site Matrixed Organization Red Pillar

2/25/2025

CR-2025-01263

EDG Air Receiver Tank Returned to Service with Identified

Condition from Internal Tank Inspection Not Fully Understood

2/26/2025

CR-2025-01586

P465 and Q479 Received during Valve Stroke of HP2A

03/08/2025

CR-2025-02078

Site Protection Did Not Meet the Effectiveness Review

Criteria Listed in ER-2024-01119-1

03/24/2025

CR-2025-02356

Improvement Opportunity - CREVS Testing

04/01/2025

CR-2025-02751

Received Computer Points Q479 HP INJ VLV LEAKING and

P465 HP INJ VLV IN PRES

04/13/2025

CR-2025-03150

25 NRC PI&R Inspection: Backup Call Manager is Out of

Service

04/24/2025

CR-2025-03358

25 NRC PI&R Inspection - Trend - Radiation Protection

Decrease in Condition Report Initiation

05/01/2025

Corrective Action

Documents

Resulting from

Inspection

CR-2025-03602

25 NRC PI&R Inspection: Observation on CR

Documentation

05/12/2025

24-1158-001

TM - AFW Pump Recirculation Rupture Disk

Engineering

Changes

CR-2014-08079

Leakage Indicated on HP57/HP59 and HP56/HP58 Back to

Back Check Valve Test, DB-PF-03969

05/01/2014

Surveillance Test Intervals (STI) List

ATL-2025-0147

24 SCWE Survey: Davis-Besse - Negative Red Questions

and Department/Section Discussions

2/11/2025

OE-2021-0105-6

NRC Information Notice 2020-04: Operating Experience

Related to Failure of Buried Fire Protection Main Yard Piping

04/20/2023

OE-2023-0138-1

OE547830R20230412 Turbine Trip due to Primary Phase

Differential Generator Lockout

05/10/2023

OE-2023-0341-1

IER L1-17-5, Rev.1 Line of Sight to the Reactor Core

08/22/2023

OE-2023-0397-1

OE559877R20230914 Main Generator Transformer Lockout

Caused By Failed Lightning Arrestor

01/04/2024

OE-2023-0482-1

OE563910R20231103 Degraded Service Water Piping

01/03/2024

Miscellaneous

OE-2023-0514-1

IN 2023-06, Emergency Telecommunication Services

Changes, ML23289A249

2/11/2023

71152B

Miscellaneous

OE-2024-0002-2

NRC Information Notice 2023-04: Operating Experience

Related to Fire Events at Decommissioning Nuclear Power

01/02/2024

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

Plants In The United States

OE-2024-0012-2

Information Notice 2021-01, Supplement 1: Lessons Learned

From U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspections of

Design-Basis Capability Of Power-Operated Valves at

Nuclear Power Plants

01/12/2024

OE-2024-0016-1

OE577016R20240114 Loss of Offsite Power Path due to

Cable Pothead Fault to Ground

03/19/2024

OE-2024-0062-1

NRC Information Notice 2024-01: Minimization And Control

of Contamination Involving Discrete Radioactive Particles

at Decommissioning Facilities

2/15/2024

OE-2024-0121-1

NRC Information Notice 2024-02: Impact on Licensee

Emergency Plans From Changes Made by Offsite Response

Organizations to Alert And Notification Systems

04/04/2024

OE-2024-0141-2

OE558315R20240415 Fuel Assembly Misplaced

10/14/2024

OE-2024-0305-1

OE587467R20240830 Main Transformer Fire Resulted in

Loss of One Train of Offsite Power and Reactor Trip

10/22/2024

OE-2024-0341-1

OE581674R20240930 Automatic Plant Runback due to

Integrated Control System

10/14/2024

DB-CH-06900

Operational Chemical Control Limits

DB-OP-06513

Auxiliary Building Non-Radioactive Areas Ventilation

DBRM-EMER-

5003

Equipment Important To Emergency Response

FLT-PI-BP1350

Corrective Action Review Board

NOBP-LP-2003

Employee Concern Program

NOBP-OP-0012

Operator Workarounds, Burdens, Control Room Deficiencies

and Operations Aggregate Assessment

NOP-LP-2001

Corrective Action Program

NOP-LP-2023

Conduct of Quality Assurance Compliance Auditing

NOP-OP-1009

Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments

Procedures

NORM-OP-1009

SRO Review of Condition Reports

ATA-2023-10840

Review and Assess Area Radiation Monitor OE

06/29/2023

ATA-2023-11519

Operations Assessment of Procedural Workarounds in OPS

Procedures

07/11/2023

Self-Assessments

ATA-2023-20106

Emergency Diesel Generator 2 October 2023 Maintenance

11/27/2023

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

Outage Critique

ATA-2023-21847

Davis-Besse Radiation Protection Program Review for 2024

in accordance with NOP-OP-4001 (Radiation Protection

Program)

2/28/2023

ATA-2023-2758

Conduct Rollup Assessment of Department Response to IPA

Gap and Focus Areas Following Training Cycle 23-02

2/09/2023

ATA-2023-2857

NRC Cyber Security Inspection IP71130.10 Self-Assessment

2/13/2023

ATA-2023-2857

NRC Cyber Security Inspection IP71130.10 Self-Assessment

2/13/2023

ATA-2023-4223

PM Feedback Self-Assessment

03/08/2023

ATA-2023-4498

Davis-Besse Emergency Feedwater System Assessment

03/10/2023

ATA-2023-9469

NI Divergences: Trend and Summarize Nuclear

Instrumentation Power Range Divergences

06/07/2023

ATA-2024-1977-

ATA-37

Area 8 Fitness-for-Duty Reviews/Assessments

01/26/2024

ATL-2022-0550-

ATA-16

2nd Quarter 2023 Unannounced Call-in Drill

08/25/2023

ATL-2022-0902-

ATA-05

Assess Actions Taken to Date Regarding Chemistry

Section's Three Red Pillars in the 2022 SCWE Survey

2/12/2022

ATL-2023-0258-

ATA-09

Review Project Schedules Generated to Ensure They Have

Sufficient Granularity

06/26/2024

ATL-2023-0673-

ATA-18

Monitor Quality of Completed CAP Products

01/13/2025

ATL-2024-0448-

ATA-06

Quarterly Unannounced Augmentation Drill - 3rd Quarter

24

10/10/2024

ATL-2025-0221-

ATA-05

25 NRC PI&R Inspection Document Request -

Performance Improvement

04/04/2025

QFO-2023-0008

Fitness-For-Duty Audit

10/30/2023

QFO-2024-0004

Corrective Action Program (CAP) Limited Scope Audit

2/20/2024

QFO-2024-0013

MS-C-24-08-03 Radiation Protection (QA Audit)

08/05/2024

WO 200877259

RCS Flow Rate Test

04/04/2024

Work Orders

WO 200925503

Troubleshoot / Repair / Replace RPS2RC2406

11/30/2023