IR 05000346/1978028
| ML19269C378 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1979 |
| From: | Creed J, Hind J, Howell J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19269C374 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-78-28, NUDOCS 7902020035 | |
| Download: ML19269C378 (2) | |
Text
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
-
Report No. 50-346/78-28 Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 Licensee: Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Facility Name: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection At: Davis-Besse Site, Oak Harbor, OH Inspection Conducted: December 11-15, 1978 hosib%
[m
//22/ 74
,
Inspectors:
T. J. Madeda
/!? 2!7 f
.
.
w...
J. R. Creed.,y
-
9.Y
7 2 !'77 J{ C. Howell
n i
'
k
/
.-,. Hind, Chief
/hd 79 Approved By:
A Safeguards Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on December 11-15, 1978 (Report No. 50-346/78-28)
Areas Inspected: Unannounced physical protection inspection including:
(a) actions taken by the licensee to correct items of noncompliance identified during an inspection conducted June 12-15, 1978; (b) imple-mentation of the procedural aspects of 10 CFR 73.55, which became effective May 25, 1977; (c) implementation of the approved security plan, submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.34(c); (d) 10 CFR 73.70 requirements; (e)
the licensee's progress towards total implementation of 10 CFR 73.55 requirements; and (f) action taken as a result of IE Circular 78-17.
Specifically, the inspection covered areas relative to:
the security plan, security organization, physical barriers, access controls,
'730202 OC3 f
,
.
detection aids, communications controls, response requirements, testing and maintenance of security related equipment and record requirements.
The inspection involved 111 inspection-hours onsite and at the licensee's corporate headquarters by three N1.C inspectors.
Results: Of the nine areas specifically inspected, no items of noncompliance were identified in four areas; five items of noncompliance were identified in four areas:
(Secur ty Organization - Paragraphs 3.a and 3.b: Access Control - Paragraph 4; Detection Aids - Paragraph 5; Comnunications Controls - Paragraph 6).
Three items are considered infractions, two are deficiencies. The licensee completed adequate corrective action for one item, (Paragraph 4 - Access Control) and initiated corrective action on the others. Of the three previously identified items of non-compliance, onc item is closed, one item remains open pending installation of equipment and corrective action on one item did not prevent recurrence.
e ATTACHMI::f C'
'l 10 CFR 2.790 (d) :' ".
' ' "
-
-2-t.