IR 05000346/1978021
| ML19319B736 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1978 |
| From: | Little W, Masse R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319B627 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-78-21, NUDOCS 8001270192 | |
| Download: ML19319B736 (3) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
,__
. ___
_ _ _ _ _
fG O
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-346/78-21
,
Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 i
Licensee: Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 46352 l
Facility Name: Davis-Besse Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1 Inspection At: Davis-Besse Site, Oak Harbor, OH Inspection Conducted: August 7-9, 1978 8//7!78
.' E M
Inspector:
Approved By:
L hief
/[ 78
.
Nuclear Support Se tion 2
/
Inspection Summary Inspection on August 7-9, 1978 (Report No. 50-346/78-21)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of facility operations for conformance with regulatory requirements. The inspection involved 20 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
)
.
\\
8001270 f f2
-
.
.
-
-
-
-.
-
-. -__
OU DETAILS 1.
persons Contacted
- T. Murray, Station Superintendent
- W. Green, Administrative Coordinator M. Derivan, Operations Supervisor
- B. Geddes, Health Physics Supervisor
- T. Hart, Quality Assurance Engineer R. Flood, Shif t Supervisor The inspector also interviewed several operators during the course of the inspection.
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
Logs and Operating Records
?
.
The inspector reviewed the following logs and records for the period
!
of time since the last operations inspection:
a.
Reactor Operator's Log O
b.
Shift Supervisor's Log (Unit Log)
]
c.
Tagout Log d.
Jumper / Lifted Lead Log e.
Standing Orders f.
Special Orders g.
Administrative Memoranda h.
Rad Waste Operator's Log i
1.
Primary Plant / Equipment Status Board The inspector verified that logs and records were being maintained in accordance with Technical Specifications and applicable Admin-istrative Directives; that logs contained proper detail and were signed or initialed; that logs provided sufficient detail to communicate equipment or plant status, including correction or restoration status; that equipment or operations relating to Technical Specification lLaitations or surveillance requirements were identified; and that log reviews were being conducted by cognizant plant staff. The inspector verified that Orders and Jumper / Lifted Lead Logs did not conflict with Technical Specifi-Cations.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
O v-2-
_ O 3.
Deviation Reports (DVR's)
The inspector reviewed recent DVR's submitted by the Davis-Besse staff. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Plant Tours The inspector made a tour of various areas and buildings upon arrival at the site. Later, he accompanied the Operations Supervisor on a detailed tour of the Auxiliary and Fuel Building areas and had the following comments:
Proper radiation control is lacking in various areas including a.
wrong postings, misuse of Anti-C's in and around contaminated areas, misuse of step-off pads, lack of contamination control, etc. An earlier inspection identified problems in these same areas and at that time the licensee asked that they be given until September to clear up matters and establish and maintain a good program of radiation and contamination control. The inspector noted that so far an effort in this direction was not apparent and reminded the licensee of this commitment. This area will be reviewed at a later date.
b.
Local instrumentation functioned properly, Housekeeping was generally good; no obvious fire hazards c.
existed.
d.
No leaks were in evidence; no unusual vibrations or noise areas existed for the plant conditions.
(40% power).
Selected switch and valve positions were in accordance with e.
plant operational requirements.
f.
Tags on equipment were visible and in accordance with
,
AD 1803.00, tagging procedure.
The inspector verified that tours were conducted on a regular basis by cognizant management personnel and that these tours were logged by the Shif t Supervisor in the Unit Log.
,
'
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Para-
.
graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on August 9, 1978.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
m G-3-