IR 05000346/1978011
| ML19319B732 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1978 |
| From: | Little W, Masse R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319B624 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-78-11, NUDOCS 8001270188 | |
| Download: ML19319B732 (4) | |
Text
, - _._ _ _. _ _ _. -. _ _ _ _ _.. _ -.
_.
. _
__
.
_
. _
_ _..
.
.._.
_
O
!
!
!
!
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT i
i
REGION III
i
Report No. 50-346/78-11
Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3
,
l Licensee: Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza
300 Madison Avenue l
Toledo, OH 43652
.
i Facility Name: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1
!
Inspection At: Davis-Besse Site, Oak Harbor, OH Inspection Conducted: May 15-17, 1978
/f hI Inspector:
/*.,
N d M 7h
/U V
Approved By: T. S. Li, le,"Ch ef
'
'
Nuclear Support Section 2
'
]
Inspection Summarv i
j Inspection on Mav 15-17, 1978 (Report No. 50-346/78-11)
i Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of facility operations for conformance with established requirements and procedures. The inspec-tion involved 21 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
'
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4
i
.
I
!
.
8001270 [hg
!
'c,
. -.
- -, -..
,, _ _.
.,
,,........ _.. _,.... _.., _.... -,_,
.,-
i
, _ _
..
--- m
, _ _,,. - -, -. _ _ - -
... _ _ _.
..
..
-
-
- - -.
..-
.
-
_ _
_
- - -
+
\\
J DETAILS i
1.
Persons Contacted
- T. Murray, Plant Superintendent
- W. Green, Administrative Coordinator
- M. Derivan, Operations Supervisor D. Briden, Chemist & Health Physicist
,
'
)
- J. Byrne, Quality Assurance Engineer I
R. Flood, Shift Foreman
D. Snyder, Supervising Operator
)
!
The inspector also interviewed several reactor operators and auxiliary l
operators.
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
i'
2.
Logs and Operating Records
The inspector reviewed the following logs and records:
a.
Control Room Log and Unit Log b.
Standing Orders
>
c.
Special Orders
,
d.
Rad Waste Log i
e.
Secondary Log
!
I f.
Containment Direct Access Log g.
Operations Administrative Memorandums h.
Primary Plant / Equipment Status Board 1.
Jumper and Lifted Lead Log j.
Tagout Log k.
Superintendent's Daily Set-up Sheets
.
!
-2-
. -
..
- -
.
_
_ _ _ _.
__
._, _. _ - - _, _. - _
.. _,
,. _. _ _ _
. _ _. _..__
.
The inspector verified that logs and records were being maintained in accordance with Technical Specifications and applicable Admin-istrative Directives; that logs contained proper detail and were signed or initialed; that Unit and Control Room Logs provided sufficient detail to communicate equipment or plant status, including
'
correction or restoration status; that equipment or plant operations relating to Technical Specification limitations or surveillance requirements were identified; and that log book reviews were being conducted by cognizant plant staff. The inspector verified that Orders and Jumper Logs did not conflict with Technical Specification requirements.
The inspector suggested ways to clarify relative inconsistencies in the Control Room Logs. The licensee agreed to review the recommen-dations. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Deviation Reports (DVR's)
The inspector reviewed recent DVR's submitted by the Davis-Besse staff. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Plant Tour The inspector accompanied an Auxiliary Operator during his rounds of primary plant areas observing operator actions, log taking, knowledge of areas, equipment and general housekeeping. The fol-loving was observed during the tour:
a.
Local instrumentation functioned properly.
b.
Housekeeping was generally good; no obvious fire hazards existed and radiation / contamination areas were adequately posted and controlled.
c.
Leaks were not evident; no unusual vibration or noise areas existed (the plant was in a refueling shutdown condition).
d.
Selected switch and valve positions were in accordance with plant operational requirements.
Tags on various equipment were very visible and in accordance e.
with AD 1803.00, the station procedure for tagging.
The inspector verified that tours were conducted on a regular basis by cognizant management personnel and that these tours are logged by the Shift Supervisor in the Unit Log.
'l J-3-n-w-,
-~r
,r
-
--
_-..
. _
-. _ -
. - -
-
-
.
i N
5.
Control Room Operations At the time of the inspection, Davis-Besse plant was conducting fuel alteration activities with the reactor cavity flooded, etc in an effort to inspect burnable poison rod assemblies, hence, the plant was in a refueling mode. The inspector verified that all Technical Specifications relative to the refueling activities were being
'
observed in the Control Room such as core monitoring, communications,
,
boron concentration, etc.
The inspector selected various alarms in the Control Room and discussed their origin, their applicability to the situation, and knowledge of required responses with various operators. The inspector verified that operator and senior operator manning requirements were in accordance with Technical Specifications.
The inspector discussed general equipment response, panel design, training, plant parameters, etc. to check operator knowledge and capabilities. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on May 17, 1978.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
,
,
,
!
fG-4-
i i
. _.
- - _