IR 05000344/1987045
| ML20234F328 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1987 |
| From: | Mendonca M, Pereira D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20234F288 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-344-87-45-MM, NUDOCS 8801110427 | |
| Download: ML20234F328 (26) | |
Text
4
'
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[
REGION V
Report Na. 50-344/87-45
<
Docket No. 50-344 License No. NPF-1 Licensee:
Portland General Electric Company
,
121 S. W. Salmon Street
.
Portland, Oregon 97204 I
Facility Name:
Trojan Nuclear Plant Inspection at:
Re d n V, Walnut Creek, California Report Prepared by:
/bv _
/2 7 ff D.
ereira, Reactor Inspector Date Signed
.
Approved by:
T h N u cte, ~ <~
/ c/w/f7 M. M. hendonca, Chief Date Signed Reactor Projects Section 1 Meeting Summary:
Meeting on December 1, 1987_(Meeting Report No. _50-344/87-45)
Scope: A licensee management meeting to review the Design Basis Documentation and System Engineer programs.
Results: A summary of the licensee's programs un Design Basis Documentation and System Engineer programs was pretanted.
!
0801110427 871223 DR ADOCK 050
.
a DETAILS 1.
Meeting Attendees a.
Licensee Attendees D. W. Cockfield, Vice President, Nuclear T. D. Walt, Manager, Nuclear Safety and Regulation A. N. Roller, Manager, Nuclear Plant Engineering D. W. Swan, Manager, Technical Services b.
NRC Attendees J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator A. E. Chaffee, Deputy Director, Reactor Safety and Projects R. P. Zimmerman, Chief, Reactor Project Branch M. M. Mendonca, Chief, Reactor ProjectsSection I J. L. Crews, Senior Reactor Engineer D. B. Pereira, Project Inspector R. C. Barr, Senior Resident Inspector c.
Oregon Department of Energy H. Moomey, Oregon Resident Inspector 2.
Details of Management Meeting Mr. Martin presented the opening remarks to the licensee management with the premise that the System Engineering Program and the Design Basis Documentation Program are two important facets of any nuclear power plant.
A number of plants across the nation, are finding it difficult to reconstruct the design after the fact.
The design bases are important factors for the operation, maintenance and testing of any nuclear power plant.
Another important consideration, though secondary, is that a large number of plants plan extending the plant operations beyond the design life.
These considerations are being looked at in more detail and j
with greater attention by NRC staff.
l Mr. Martin commendea the licensea for their efforts in what appears to be viable Design Basis Documentation and System Engineer Programs.
At this point, Mr. Cockfield introduced the licensee participants who would present the licensee s pr.ograms.
Mr. T. Walt presented the d
introduction for the roeeting objectives and presentations.
The licensee's handout for this presentation is preser,ted in Enclosure 1.
Mr. A. Roller, Manager, Nuciear Plant Engineering, presented the engineering improverient programs concerning the design basis documents, technical manuals, safety-rc'ated drawings, and demonstrated performance-outage issues.
He stated that thirteen Design Basis Documents were completed in 1987, with a similar number scheduled for completion each year over the next four yisars, i
L
. -
- -
--
I
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _
a
a Mr. D. Swan, Manager, Technical Services, presented the Sy. stem Engineering Program and its objective, history, and its present status'
.
During the presentations, Mr. Martin and members of the Reglen V staff commented on the licensee's generic problems with procedural compliance and analyses of root cause of events.
For example, Mr. R. Barr, Trojan senior resident, reiterated where similar problems are reoccurring, and
'
the generic causes are not being corrected.
Mr. Barr mentioned that during this review of event reports, only two had a MORT analysis conducted out of 130 events.
Also, Mr. Martin pointed out that there were a number of technical open items associated with the Design Basis Documents and the resolution of these open items is an important part toward the success of this program.
A discussion was then held concerning the number of engineering personnel both on and off-site.
Of the 125 total engineers, 50 were contract engineers.
Mr. Cockfield mentioned that approximately 40 engineers were l
planned to be added in 1987, and approximately another 45 engineers in l
1988.
Eventually, the licensee plans to minimize the use of contract
'
engineers.
In closing, Mr. Martin commended the licensee for their development of
.
the Syster. Engineer Program and Design Basis Documentation.
The licensee's general attitude of commitment to improving engineering work was well received by the staff, and the momentum commenced by these programs should continue.
It was felt that continued attention to the System Engineer Program and Design Basis Documentation would greatly benefit the licensee in the years ahead..The staff realizes that a lot of hard work and resources still need to be expended in these areas.
It was felt that the program's success or failure would be indicative of management's stamina in pursuing and completing the programs.
i l
L ____
- - -
_ _. _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _. _ _.
. _... _ _ _ _ _ _
__
l l
.
-l
- l t
l
!
l l
ENCLOSURE 1
,
!
i l
!
,
D l
i i
l l
!
I i
I ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENTS
I A. N. ROLLER, MANAGER NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING
1
'
l l
i l
l
i i
!
l l
I
1
%
.
.,
l i
ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENTS I
DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS
-
TECHNICAL MANUALS
-
SAFETY-RELATED DRAWINGS
-
DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE - OUTAGE ISSUES
-
l i
l
,
.
.
Y T
I L S MI S B
U E A E
--
_
SRP N
E O
M U
N C
O
--
O I
D ES UI s
-
-
E S V e
-
L S E n
-
R i
I G
lp N.
i I
ct S
"
in s
-
De A
m tt O
nr
-
T ea
-
S N
S mp
._
T t e
.
N E T rD
_
I
_
E N
V N e
-
L E pn OM eot
-
M O
Din I
U T
SM t
e e
C A
EO g
m i
O M
RC nut igr D
R r e a O
e p
R
_
F e
e S
n D
N
"
id I
_
I S
gn e
-
ne A
S E
cr
_
gne
-
B IS tt oe
_
A D )1 n-rn
_
N B
A N(
os g af ui G
l A
PSsn I
N N
T AE S
G O
N rr W
eeym
-
E I
I E
t D
S SE M eeie I I lll t E
VVM cces D
uuuy EEO NNOS
-
_
E
.
_
L
-
B y
_
_
_
M
&
b
._
.
_
E N
S O
d
_
N
-
O e
I S
w
-
T
.
I e
A T
P i
PE N
I v
I CS O
R e
R NN E T
I S
C R
E S C EO L A E
S S
N
)
S O
O DI I
E
E N T Y
B M SC D
(
R T D O A M R MN S
P I
U A
P C E O EA G
P F
S N I
I E UEEI AI RWT CTR.C R AAS N C LSPER SRY E S n
AYDPA PIFDS i
CSCSS GD-J
- -
9 l
R1 Q1 NA
A C
P.ap r
Arp
{l
{~
eda 3
.
- - - - - -. -. - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _. - _ - - -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _. _,
s
.
DBD ROLE IN SYSTEM RELIABILITY REVIEW PROCESS SYSTEM REVIEW DBD's
>
I TECHNICAL MANUALS SYSTEM DESCRIPTION l
SYSTEM DRAWINGS FSAR i
' f SYSTEM WALKDOWN I
'
DUTPUTS DPERATING PROCEDURES
'
MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES TEST PROCEDURES
,
!
!
!
!
'
.
!
a PLOT 11/25/87 PFB
)
'
\\
"'
I i
DBD-1 i
SAFETY-RELATED I
DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS l
PREPARED IN 1987
{
i i
I AUXILIARY FEEDWATFR SYSTEM SERVICE WATER SYSTEM
l COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM l
)
CONTROL BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT AIR COOLERS I
i HYDROGEN MIXING SYSTEM i
CCNT AI A' MENT SPRAY SYSTEM
!
CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS l
EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORS 125-V DC SYSTEM 120-V PREFERRED INSTRUMENT AC SYSTEM EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (INCLUDES SAFETY INJECTION AND RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS)
,
,
l l
l l
l
_ _.
.
_
_
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
..
.
..
EBD-2 DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS PLANNED TO BE PREPARED IN 1988 STRUCiURAl AND SEISMIC DESIGN BASES FLOODING, 10RNA'03, TORNADO MISSILE, INTERNALLY GENERATED
)
MISSILE, HICR4.NEitGY LINE BREAK, AND MODERATE ENERGY LINE
-
BREAK DESIGN BASES FIRE PROTCCTION AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS 4.16-KV AC SYSTEM FEEDWA TiR S'f STEM FET.DWATER PUMPS AND TURBINE DRIVERS ENGINEERED SAFEGUARDS ACTUATING SYSTEM CONTAINMENT FUILDING/ PRIMARY CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE CONTAINMENT VENTILATION SYSTEMS HYDROGEN RECOMBINERS REACTOR NONNUCJ. EAR INSTRUMENTAL 10N NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTAL 10N REACTOR VESSEL / REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM AND PRESSURIZER /0 OVERPRESSURE MITIGATION SYSTEM
_ - _ _ _
.
..
i a:
DBD'-3-i DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS PLANNED TO BE PREPARED IN 1989 i
PIPING SYSTEM DESIGN BASES 12.47-KV AC SYSTEM AND STARTUP TRANSFORMERS j
l DIESEL FUEL OIL SYSTEM CHEMICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL SYSTEM STEAM GENERATORS MAIN STEAM SYSTEM 480-V AC AUXILIARY SYSTEM LOAD CENTERS 480-V AC SYSTEMS (MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS)
)
120-V INSTRUMENTATION AC SYSTEM FUEL BUILDING AND AUXILIARY BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEMS SPENT FUEL COOLING AND DEMINERALIZED SYSTEM / SPENT FUEL POOL j
CONTROL R0D DRIVE SYSTEM RADIATION SHIELDING j
l
!
l l
lo __
s
'
c.
TECHNICAL MANUALS
/
PHASE I
-
ALL TECHNICAL MANUALS (765)
COMPLETED JULY 1987 i
PHASE 11
-
165 SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEM MANUALS VENDOR REVIEW AND VERIFICATION l
REQUEST FOR DESIGN CHANGE REVIEW COMPLETE JANUARY 1, 1988
-
PHASE Ill
-
41 KEY NON-SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEM MANUALS VENDOR REVIEW AND VERIFICATION REQUEST FOR DESIGN CHANGE REVIEW
-
COMPLETE JANUARY 1, 1988
!
CONTINUING PROGRAM FOR TECHNICAL MANUALS
-
i
4 l
!
I J
- _ - _ _ _ - _ _
_ _ _
,
I
'
(
-
!
t i
l i
I l
i
'
SAFETY-RELATED DRAWINGS i
l VERIFICATION AND REDRAFTING 0F SELECTED PLANT j
'
-
DRAWINGS l
PRIMARY EMPHASIS - ELECTRICAL j
-
l 2500 SAFETY-RELATED DESIGN DRAWINGS I
-
l 2000 SAFETY-RELATED VENDOR DRAWINGS COMPLETED JANUARY 1, 1987
-
i WALKDOWNS
-
l WONKlNU/ ONGOING EFFORT CONTINUING PROGRAM
-
,
.
I
'.
)
'-
,
I
/
j i
l
!
]
DEMONSTRATED PERFORMANCE - OUTAGE ISSUES
!
i i
ACCUMULATOR "A" FILL LINE I
FEEDWATER SEISMIC RESTRAINT
!
l MAIN STEAM LINE THICKNESS
STEAM GENERATOR N0ZZLE/ REDUCERS
-
MAIN STEAM LINE SUPPORTS EROSION / CORROSION
-
l
- _
_ _ _. _ _ _ _.___._.__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _. _., _ _ _ _. _., -. _...._
s O
il
1
<
ENCLOSURE 2 i
,
i
j
- i
I I
.
I i
1
1
!
l
-
e
.._
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
\\
'
.
l
\\
l SYSTEM ENGINEER PR0 GRAM
.
)
December 1, 1987
l D. W. Swan Manager Trojan Technical Services l
___ - __ - _ _
__
__
<
..
.
TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT SYSTEM ENGINEER PROGRAM ODJECTIVE Enhance overall. plant performance and reliability-through
individual system improvements attained from the use of i
designated " Responsible System Engineers."
The System Engineers act as focal points for all activItles involving their respective systems.
HISTORY e 1984 - Operational difficulties illustrated a need for System Engineers.
,
a 1985 - Solidified the concept of System Engineer; contracted engineering assistance and budgeted for hiring additional engineers in 1986.
e 1986 - Developed procedures defining System Engineer responsibilities, began hiring additional System Engineers -
performed the first system reliability review.
e 1987 - Company and contracted Plant System Engineers are in development and supporting plant operation and maintenance.
PRESENT STATUS Engineering Resources of thirty-eight engineers e
Engineering Supervisor and three Unit supervisors e
Twenty-three authorized System Engineer positions e
Eleven contracted System Engineers
_ - - - - - - _ _
l
.
OVERVIEW OF PLANT SYSTEM ENGINEER PRIORITIES e
ENGINEER TECHNICAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT e
SUPPORT OF PLANT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE e
MONITOR AND EVALUATE PLANT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE a
ASSIGNED OPERATIONAL EVENT REPORT EVALUATIONS e
SUPPORT OF PLANT DESIGN CHANGES AND MAJOR OUTAGE PROJECTS e
EVALUATE AND ACT UPON REQUESTS FOR EVALUATION (RFE)
e DRAFT DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT (DBD) REVIEWS AND SYSTEM RELIABILITY REVIEWS e
OTHER PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
- TANK VOLUME CALCULATION VERIFICATION
- METER BANDING SUPPORT
- CHECK VALVE PROGRAM
- NPRDS REPORTING
- PARTS PROCUREMENT ASSISTANCE
- TECHNICAL MANUAL REVISION REVIEWS
-
-
-
.
.
.
.
SYSTEM ENGINEER TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT e PLANT ENGINEERING PROCEDURE (PEP) 10-6
>
e PHASE A - SYSTEM FAMILIARIZATION AND CHECKOUT a PHASE B - DESIGN BASIS REVIEW e PHASE C - DETAILED RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT REVIEW e TECHNICAL STAFF TRAINING PROGRAM
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _
.
.
.
E E
3E M7 IE F sl
!!
)
!
!Ih
~
~
~
~
~
~~
-
i n
.
l l_E E
E E
E IE
.f 1l El1!l5 hl ifl
'
-
-
-
-
-
.
.
.
-
,
I
.I
!)l.)l _ll
_I,
-
-
-
~
-
A
-
.
_.
.. _
"*
e l
"
$
!
E E
E
- E EE l
b
!ll f
!I
$
ll
~
~
-~
~
-
,
II e
n i
o u
l3 EE I
ll 1',sl E E E E ME iT-EEE a
g liriil !allil !Il ijrbi lillii i1
-
~
~
~
~
s gu 1.-__
%_I o
_
Q W
!
-
ic.ics.l r!"s fi' =iir.h.r l
~
-
i i
y
=
a n
-
,
g I
_
=
b bbbbbb f*il fg
"g Jg
"i jfj fgp ig
-
-~
~
-
~
~
-
a e
a a
el
a c
__
NWuum
- p ai!
$g h:
-
ugs
-
-
.D u
_
$f
_ _ - - _ - - - - _ - - - _ _ - - - _ - - - - _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - _
,_- _ - -. -
.
,
.
,
i SUPPORT OF PLANT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE e
TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR EVALUATION AND RESOLUTION OF EQUIPMENT / SYSTEM PROBLEMS e
NON-ROUTINE MAINTENANCE TECHNICAL SUPPORT to INSTRUMENT DUT-OF-CALIBRATION INVESTIGATIONS e
TEMPORARY MODIFICATION (TM) EVALUATIONS e
PLANT SETPOINT CHANGE (PSC) REVIEW e
SYSTEM READINESS / READY FOR STARTUP REVIEW
)
,
_ _ _,
-
.
MONITOR AND EVALUATE SYSTEM AND EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE e ROUTINELY OBSERVE SYSTEM OPERATION / CONDITION e REVIEW SURVEILLANCE AND TESTING e IDENTIFY AND TREND IMPORTANT SYSTEM PARAMETERS
,
!
'
!
l..
....
-.
-
-
.. -
. - -..
.
. -.... -... - - -..
.
.
... -. -
.
.
., *
.
.
ASSIGNED OPERATIONAL EVENT EVALUATIONS e OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT REVIEWS (OARS)
e ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE OR EQUIPMENT MALFUNCTION EVENT REPORTS (ERs)
e NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS l
i
_
s
,
,
,
b
'
,
i SUPPORT FOR DESIGN CHANGE AND s
i MA.10R OUTAGE PROJECTS
,
I,
l s REQUEST FOR DESIGN CHANGE (RDC) REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION l
>
l e OUTAGE PROJECT C00RDINATION'AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION c
,
,
'
i a
i l
!
c
s, i
-
i
>
l
{
{
EVALUATE AND ACT UPON REQUESTS FOR EVALUATION (RFEs)
e REVIEW, EVALUATE, TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON ROUTINE RFEs e
INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS (RDC, PCC, TM, SPEER, MR)
l l
j i
____- _ - _ _
.
.
I DRAFT DESIGN BASIS' DOCUMENT (DBD) REVIEWS AND SYSTEM RELIABILITY REVIEWS
e DRAFT DBD REVIEW AND CDMMENT BY SYSTEM ENGINEER e
SYSTEM REVIEW
- SYSTEM WALKDOWN
- FSAR
.
- SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
- TRAINING MATERIALS
<
- PROCEDURES
- TECHNICAL MANUALS
- SYSTEM DRAWINGS e
SYSTEM RELIABILITY REVIEWS
- FAILURE MODE ANALYSIS I
- FAILURE CONSEQUENCES
- PREVENTIVE / PREDICTIVE TASKS
- TASK IMPLEMENTATION
- POST-ANALYSIS INFORMATION I
,
1