IR 05000344/1987023

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-344/87-23 on 870521.No Noncompliances Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Responses to Open Items 86-40-01 & 86-40-02 Ref in Insp Rept 50-344/86-40
ML20214W653
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/28/1987
From: Hamada G, Yuhas G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20214W636 List:
References
50-344-87-23, NUDOCS 8706160122
Download: ML20214W653 (3)


Text

E

'

.

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

Report No. 50-344/87-23 Docket No. 50-344

~ License No. NPF-1 Licensee: Portland General Electric Company 121 S. W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Facility Name: Trojan Nuclear Plant Inspection at:

In-Office Inspection Conducted: May 21, 1987 Inspector:

. Y.

045us

- 5-2 f-P7

.G.

H. Hamada Date Signed Radiation Laboratory Specialist Approved By:

[3 M,1m

-

572f/R7 G. P.

un'es, Chief Date Signed Facilit e4 Radiological Protection Section Summary:

In-Office Inspection of May 21, 1987 (Report No. 50-344/87-23)

This~ inspection ~ involved a review of responses to open items 86-40-01 and 86-40-02 referenced in inspection Report No. 50-344/86-40.

Results: No items of noncompliance were identified in the areas examined.

=

t

..

-

--,

,

,

-

)

'

~

,

_,

'

.

6,

'

a

<,

.

,

',

DETAILS

,

'

1~.1 Discussion

-

.

,,

~

. -

.

In the inspection-report for the previous' independent measurements-

,

11nspection (Report No.- 50-344/86-40),-two items are referenced (items no.

86-40-Ol'and 86-40-02) for future resolution. -These items have been addressed by the licensee and are discussed below.

,

~

LItem.No.:86-40-02 involved the radiochemical analysis of'a spiked

fsolution provided by the NRC.

Trojan Certificate

-

Nuclide; uCi/ml-

-Value

.

.

.

-

..

.

i Sr-89 6.54 E-5. 7.47 E-5'

Sr-90 5.17 E-6. 6.77 E-6 H-3.

4.74 E-5 -5.46 E-5-

'

s Fe-55

. 3.06 E-5 3.34'E-5

.

The above table shows that the agreement is adequate. _ This test thus provides assurance that adequate accuracy is being maintained for the'

analysis-of beta' emitters _and other special nuclides such as Fe-55.

ItemNo.i86-40-O'1:involvedthemeasurementofliquidwastewhereinthe difference between the NRC and the. licensee results was large enough that the-validity of the calibration and/or the sampling procedure.needed to be reevaluated. -Subsequent tests indicated that the: calibration was not at fault as: demonstrated by the fact that the results for a homogeneous solution showed' good agreement'between a calibrated and the geometry in question.' geometry known to be, accurately.

'The investigation also revealed

,

that the mixing time of the samples obtained during the earlier.

'

inspection was not-. sufficient to assure' good mixing of, waste tarik.

.

"

contents.

The plant procedure calls for recirculating tank contents such that at least 2 tank volumes are turned over prior to sampling.

It is known_that.this takes: upwards of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> to accomplish.

The samples--

obtained for the confirmatory measurement comparisons were taken = after ".

'

-

only one hour of mixing.

Other tests;were' conducted'to determine-ifi e

+

settling of suspended material in the interval.between sampling 1.and.

  • a

-

.

analysis could have caused the observe.d differences.

These tests proved-negative and thus it was concluded that the discrepancies were' the result of heterogeneous splits which in turn.resulted from' insufficient mixing.

Asamatterofscientificinterest,thequestionof[whetherornot'N-13

'

l

'

- had been: observed at Trojan was also discussed..Because of the nature of.

.

N-13 decay, its only significant photon _ energy is the 511 Kev annihilation radiation _line.

However, this energy is not normally used to quantify activity because many _different nuclides can and do contribute to this line.

Contribution to the 511: Kev line from N-13 can be estimated by doing-a decay analysis _of this energy.

This was done and

_it was determined that in the sample _that was analyzed, about 70 percent

,

~

+%_ :-

,

i

,

.

2-

-

(,.,

,,. _

,

,,

,,.

,

,.

-, -

,.

'. ^ '. m

.

.

.

.

...

Up to this point, the 511 Kev line

'

.

..

of the 511 Kev.line was due to N-13.

-

. i.

was attributed (conservatively) to~F-18 decay.

'

-Nitti this report'open items no. 86-40-01 and no. 86-40-02 are closed.

'

2.

Exit Interview

'

'

Issuesassociatedwif.htheopenitemsandinparticulartheresultsfor the spiked sample were discussed with Mr. Bill Kernion over the-

'

,

' telephone.

s

/

+

4

$

~

r

?

s.

,

,

,-

., - -

.,, -,. - - - _

.

.,

- - - - -

..,,

,

,.,