IR 05000341/1985051

Insp Rept 50-341/85-51 on 851204-06.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Work on Environ Qualification Requirements of 10CFR50.49

ML20138N626
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	12/18/1985
From:	Smeenge R, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138N604	List: IR 05000341/1985051 ML20138N601
References
50-341-85-51, NUDOCS 8512240091
Download: ML20138N626 (3)

Text

p i n .

- ; .-

.

'

-

.

..

,_ ,

_, . ,

,

.

.

.. .' -_-f+c

_ . - .-

_")

- e )

y '

,

, >

- -

, s

-

,

w r  % ,

}. , ~ 4 .

'

.

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION

.n .- , ,

,

'

t

. .-

l REGION III-

%  :

'

- [ReportNo.E50-341/85051(DRS).

, u:y . , ,

.

.

'

?

iDochetNo.'f50-341 License No..NPF-33

,y . -

~

^ : Licensee:L.DetroitEdisonl Company; .

' '

52000~Second Avenue-

.

-

Detroit,' MId 48224 Fadility Name: 'Enrico_ Fermi Nuclear Power _. Plant, Unit 2

',' ,

'

l Inspection-At: -Enrico FermiJ2LSite,= Monroe,-MI

,

m - . . . . . . o . .

' ;Inspection Conducted: .:De ember 4-6,71985-

- ,

,

• - > Inspector: .Ro . Smeenge-

'

/2.///'/J'C-Date' '

"

. :&.c 9 w (A ,. 7 w (tpeen

,

-

. . . ..

? Approved By; . . C.- Williams,. Chie .

-

' '

-

Plant Systems Section Dat s .

,

f- ,3

' '? "- . Inspection' Summary--

~

'

I:-Inspection on December.4-6,11985-(Report No.'50-341/85'051(DRS))

m iAreas Inspected: . Special' unannounced inspection.of. licensee actions on work

'.' -;being. performed:in:regards to the environmental qualification 4 requirements.of f 210 CFR'50.49.' ._ The inspection involved a total _ of-23 inspector-hours onsit'e by ,

~

_

S LoneWegional-inspector..~ _ . . .

, .

f %, 2: Results: .Of-the areas-Kinspected,Lno' violations or deviations.were identifie m e

y- *

s

'

.o

. - .

'

>

-

M.g2240091 =

ADOCK 05000341- 851218 ", i

-

. - pop

_ ,

, .

.

e _

,s ;c -

N .- ,,

+ ~ w 4 '

I

.

s

e y E g3 -

,. .. .

. , :; '

,

,

g N; ,

'

,

-

,

.

, Q -

M> ,

-

' ~

? -

DETAILS'

,.,.

--x

,[ 1 JPersons" Contacted ,

'

e ,

'

Detroith Edison'- Company; M _

• LJ Simpkin',: General Suhervisor',:Q/E

$

-

*Qi Duong,f Supervisor, EQ

,

, g J.iConen,)

• Licensing Engineer

, ~ cP.7Pierron,'EQ: Engineer L. Raisanes,!EQ Engineer

, _

-C.yEmanuele,: Materials Engineering Group;

-

7J.fHanka;-Materials Engineering Grou ' ~

<

_ nac _

~

,

iPTByron,' Senior (ResidentfInspector-

.*M.; Parker,: Resident Inspecto ' '

. *identifiesithbse'persohs who atitendedithe.exitimeeting onL eEdsb'er 6,

^

- '<

, ?1985 1 <

_ , ,

g . J2 7 Inspection =De' tails:

- .

.

, , " a .' Documents"ReViewedi

m ~~

The~in'pector s . reviewed the following documents lwhich currentlyL:.

~

'

implement the:11censee's program forLreview and approval of-work -

<

performed and procurement:of Environmentally _ Qualified (EQ)

-equipment:

' ' ~

- ~(1):,NE-1.1621,;"The-Engineering Evaluation of. Stock an'd'Non-Stock '

l Items and Services," Revision 0, dated April!26,' 1985

'

< -

.

^ '

.

. : .. .

~

. .

-

• . [(2)'LNE-3.9,?" Preparation, Review and Approval of Engineering' Design

.

l Packages (EDPs),"'Revisien 4, dated August 30, 1985-

'

. , ,

^

M(3)eNOP-103,("NuclearSafetyReviewProgram," Revision 0,. dated

~ .

November 19,-1985-

_

,

,

(4) Procedure 7.2,'"Q-List," Revision'1,! dated August 6,.1985

~

, ,

-

- (5) Procedure :7.7, " Overview of!the Environmental Qual'ification-

• Program'," Revision 0,-dated: June 6, 1985'

'

-

-(6) 3 Policy' Letter.EF2-68,607, " Equipment Qualification Requirements

,

_

, R for QA-1 Electrical : Spare / Replacement- Parts," dated January ,11,

' ~

,

,

1985-

'

~(7)1" Environmental Qualification'of Safety Related Electric

'

-Equipment'forl Harsh' Environments"-(specific equipment

'

.

" *

~ qualification summaries)

.

,

a E

'

, - 2

_-

U ..

w, , .

+

-

. -

.m

_ __

.

'

-

,

<

.e,.. ,j A _ _ . .

p*

, .

'

Of ' i .

~

? . ,. , ,

_ ,

Engineerina Design Packages'

'

,

-  : b.- ,

'

ktitiheltime ofithi J inspection,1the. licensee was performingJs. review-

of 273 Engineering Design Packages'.(EDPs) which were~ associated with *

-

lthe' plant 21: safety-related.-systems:that'contain EQ equipment. -Thi , - review wasjinitiated by th'e licensee'EQ group;to' ensure:thatialliEDPs,.

'

'

-

issued 'to 'datei regarding EQ equipment had received the ~ require'd '

y- . -reviews. ?The NRC.uinspector c monitored this licensee review and was

>

appraised'of, progress throughcutLthe' course'of this inspectio ' Prior to the'. exit ~ meeting on December 6, 1985, the licensee.had-completed

their review. 10f the 273 EDPs reviewed by the licensee,.

- ' * l180fwere: identified as not requiring:EQ review due to the:following:

.

20 were cancelled,'106 were-nonsafety-related applications,;53 were .

3 :for equipme'nt that was'not. required to. operate in an' accident:

'

-

,

environment,'and l'was combined with another EDP. .0f the 93fremaining, 48 were completed EDPs with evidence 'of t'.e required EQ review and 45

~

were 'not'yet-issued or required beyond'a Potential l Design Change (PCD).

"

.

~

-

ThelinspectorLreviewed>seven completed EDPs for EQ equipmen One-EDP, reviewed,' relocated a transmitter.from a. harsh to mild environment

,and the'other six replaced unqualified equipme_nt, located in a harsh

'

W

~

, 1 environment, with qualified. equipment. The~seven packages hadl idocumented reviews by the QE group and sign off by Quality Assurance ((QA) forl hold points and completed wor ,

r ;s -

-

'; Purchase Requisitions Reviewed .

- ~

TheLNRC inspector, reviewed. ten purchase requisitions for equipmen '

identified on the Q-List'(identifies plant safety-related equipment).

+ -

4 iThe nineLwhich required EQ had-been' reviewed by the licensee and the

EQ

requirements identified on the associated equipment:q'ualification

.. ' '

- < ~ summaries ~ sheets were-included.in the purchase requisition ,~ " _. Replacement' equipment which had initially been qualified to

_

'

NUREG-0588, Category II'was upgraded to Category I as' required b ' '

D

'

310 CFR-50.4 ' .

.- i ' Inspection Results'  ;

_ EIn this'limitediscope EQ inspection no' violations or deviations were-

-

Lidentified. /A more detailed EQ inspection is-scheduled for mid-198 ,

J iExit Interview

'

LThe; inspector met with the licensee representatives-(denoted in Persons

' Contacted);at.the conclusions'of-the inspection on December 6, 1985. The

'

,f - f inspector summarized the purpose and. findings of the inspection, which

were acknowledged by the licensee. The inspector also discussed the

_

Liikely.informationalscontent of the inspection report with regard to '

-

idocuments or processes revie'wed by the inspector during the inspectio = The-licensee did not' identify any.such documents / processes.as proprietar i

,d '

-

't t '

~

.

.

w .

.M'.-

'

- - - , .