IR 05000320/1973001
| ML19220B346 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 04/17/1973 |
| From: | Tillou J, Varela A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19220B343 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-320-73-01, 50-320-73-1, NUDOCS 7904250656 | |
| Download: ML19220B346 (6) | |
Text
,
i
.
.
- '
.
.
i;
.--
{
.
,
'..
-
.
-
U. S. ATO:!IC E!;ERCY CLT:11SS10!;
.t
,
!
g
.
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIO :S i.:
..
,
REC 10:; I
.
.
RO Inspection Report !!o.:
i.
_ 50-320/73-0I Licensee:
Docket 1;o. : 30-3rr
- .
Metrcpolitan Edisen Ccepcny
}
-
License !!o. :CPPR-6 P.O. box 542
-
f Priority.-
Reading, Pennsylvania
-
r i
Category:___ A-2 L
'
_
-y Location:
Middleto.m, Pennsylvania i
_
.
Type of Licensee:
F'n'R 831 L'e (B&")
_
_
Type of Inspection:
_
Routine, Unannounced
-
l Dates of Inspection:
Ma rch 14-16, 19 73
-
j Dates of Previous inspection:_
December 28, 1972 & January 3-5, 1973
.-
_
___
,
'%-
Reporting Inspector:
/.
,(
cd A. M.\\Va'ela, Reactbr Inspector f /[ 73
,
r-p.
,
Oate 1' -
..
Acco=panying Inspectors:
.
.
None
!
..
l
..
.
Date ~'
.
!'
-
-
Date __
.
..
Other Accompanying Personnel:
_
--.
n Reviewed by:
-
.
( N S // / e' N c ~-
l
.
J. H. Tillou, Acting Senior Reactor Inspector
-/7-7)
__
_
Date
.
.
.
183
.
.
<o
,
--
.
7904J' 50620
-
'
--
.
...,.. _.
-..
.
.
.
.
~
I
SN".ARY OF FI?,T~NGS i
!
o
.
..
"
l
.
'
Enforcement Action
None
,
Licensee Action en Previcus1'; Identified Enforcement Action
.
.
.
!
Not. applicable Desien Changes
.
f None
,.
.
,
i U nusual Occurrences
_
Ecne
,I
.I Other Sicnificant Findines s
1 A.
Current Findines
.
.
1, T
.
~j 1.
Classification of condensate storage tanks, is an unresolved j
ite=.
(Report Details, Paragraph 2)
.:
-
i 2.
Borated water storage tank procure =ent docunents.
(Report De-j tails, Paragraph 3)
Y 3.
Verification of answers to violations cited in previous report.
j (Report Details, Paragraph 4)
-
4.
Field inspection and record review of construction of post ten-
,
sion elements.
(Report Details, Paragraph 5)
I j
B.
Status of Previousiv Recorted Unresolved Items Not inspected
,
Management Interview The managecent interview was held at the site on March 16, 1973 with licensee and contractor personnel.
-
.
- <a
-
-
..a
,
_
G
s d
.
'
,
..
.
.
a
.
,
-2-
H s
b
,
.
$
Tersonnel Attendinc
,
l GPUSC j
Mr. M. J. Strceberg, Site QA Auditor i
Mr. W.
S. Shepherd, Proj ect Engineer i
.
'
t UE5C l
Mr. V. E. Cichocki, Construction QA/QC Coordinator i
Mr. J. C. Spinak, Lead QA Engineer
)
The following ite=s were discussed:
'
A.
Condensate Storace Tanks Classified as Class I in PSAR Found Delisted
]
in the Burns & Roe (B&R) Site Ecuirrent Classification.
(Recort De-
_
tails, Paracraoh 2)
.
The licensee was unprepared to explain the delisting of the Condensate j
Storage Tanks but agreed to investigate and provide answer.
The inspector stated that this would be carried as an unresc1ved tics.
g
,
}
B.
Procurement Documents for Borated Water Storace Tank Were Found With-
)
out Accarent De ficiency (Recort Details, Paracraoh 3)
-
J The licensee acknowledged this state =ent.
C.
I Review of Chances and Corrections made to Cadweld Solice Procedures to Verify Answers to Violations Cited in Previous Report (Renort De-tails, Paragraph 3)
i The inspector stated that the violations appeared to have been resolved.
_
<
The licensee acknowledged this statement.
D.
Inspection of Contain=ent Buildine Post Tensionine Conduits and Anchoranes Disclosed No Deficiency (Recort Details, Paracraph 5)
The licensee acknowledged this statement.
-
( -
18b-
.
.<,a
}
-
n
-
!
_
a
,
.
..
,
-
.
,
[.*
-3-
.
I
.1
~
DETAILS i
~
i j
1.
Persons Contacted
.
I CPUSC
,
Mr. M. J. Strenberg, Site QA Aud'itor i
Mr. J. H. Wright, Resident Civil Engineer Mr. J. A. Renshaw, QA Specialist j
Mr. J.
- . Wright, QA Manager i
Mr. W. S. Shepherd, Proj ect Engineer j
Mr. T. Hrecruch, Mechanical Engineer
1 UMC
_
,
Mr. V. E. Cichocki, Construction QA/QC Coordinated a
Mr. J. C. Spinak, Lead QA Engineer Mr. D. C. Lambert, QA Supervisor
"
Mr. D. Mason, Job Engineer
Mr. F. Wallick, QC Inspector
-
7-g
-,
d j
MW i
j Mr. J. H. Uhl, Site Manager
~
i
.4 2.
Condensate Storace Tank Classification
)
The PSAR states that the Condensate Storage Tanks are classified
!
as safety related Class I items and are structurally designed in i
accordance with Class I design bases.
However the inspector ob-j served that B&R's Equipnent Classification List, dated March 29,
-
1972 (latest availabla), has the word "No" under the listing of
}
" saf e guard s".
When the inspector inquired of licensee if this j
ites would be controlled by Appendix B,10 CFR 50 the first re-i sponse was that the FSAR for Unit #2, now in preparation, would
place these tanks in the safety related status of Class II.
How-t; ever at management interview the licensee stated that an investi-i gation was underway to clear up an apparent inconsistency between the B&R listing and the PSAR and to update the listing by clari-fication of the safety related status of these tanks.
_
3.
Borated Water Storace Tank The contract specifications issued by E&R and the purchase order i
(_
-i90
-
I c,. tJ w
.
I f
-
-
I
-
{
,
j
-
,
'
}
- '4 -
.
.
,
J,
i.
-s a
- )
to Pittsburgh-Deioines Co. (PDM) for design, furnish of =aterial,
.
f abricate and deliver to site the borated water storage tank were reviewed.
j The procurc=ent docu=ents were found to contain the necessary infor-
)
=ation to obtain the recuired material and subasse=blies including:
{
quantity, na=e of =aterial, grade, class and size a.
i i
b.
allowable stress values to be in accordance with ASTM Section l
VIII
c.
design basis require =ents j
il d.
QA data sheet require =ents
a e.
=aterial chemical and physical mill test reports
_
f.
inspection and code data sheet report forms Tank erection and field welding vill be a separate contract. The 4 nspector was infor=ed that the procurement contract to PDM was
-
f issued in February 1973 therefore the PDM procedures and final draw-
"
ings are not yet available.
-
4.
Cadweld Solice Procedure Chances As a result of violations cited in RO Report 50-320/73-07 on cadweld-ing, the licensee revised procedure QC-1-2 on January 3,1973.
The following changes were found by the inspector to dispose of the violations and, this item is considered closed.
i
~
A contradiction was re=oved in qualification of cadweld operators a.
b.
New and tightened acceptance criteria are provided for cadweld splices where the rebar contacts the inside diameter of the sleeve.
5.
Post Tension Conduits and Acchorages Field inspection of post tension conduit and anchorage location lay-out, in preparation for the containment building concrete lif t nu=ber ten, verified confor=ance to approved field procedures.
Quality con-
,
trol documentation and as built records were reviewed and fourd to be complete and without apparent deficiency.
-
('
.
l.
-
rk -j@
<a i
.
-