IR 05000320/1973004
| ML19220B168 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1973 |
| From: | Folsom S, Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19220B160 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-320-73-04, 50-320-73-4, NUDOCS 7904250491 | |
| Download: ML19220B168 (6) | |
Text
.
.
U,s, t.*iCMIC E :ERGY CC:'".ISSIO:t
-
.
'
.
DIPICTO2 ATE OF REGUIATOnY OF RATIC::S
'
FIGIO:t I
.
Docket !:o.: 50-32n 50-320/73-00 eno..
RO In pectica Repor+m Cvv=-Ft License 1:o.:
--'
w trepolitan Edisca Company
. Li ce r-c
- Merity:
Sox 542
..
19603
. Category:
Eeading Pennsv1vania
~
.
"iddlete. n, Tennsv1vania (Tnree "ile Island 2)
_
Location:
.
-
PNR 831 Irie (BE.'O
-
Type of Licensec:
-
Routine, Unanncunced
-
,
e O,. InspcC.4on.
.
o
.
Septe+er 27-28, October 1-2, 1973
.
.
Dates of Inspection:
'
July 23-25, 1973
_
Dates of Previous inspection:
.
I orting Inspector:
>
- % ate eo-D Seth /m Folsca, Reactor Insp ctor
.
.
.
.
Acc:=panying In:pectorc:
.
Date
.
-
.
,
.
.
.Date
.
-
.
.
-
Date
.
.
.
.
-_
Date
.
Other Accompanying P.ersonnel:_.
Date
._
.
[
dC' 6
'
Date Revicued by-Heishman, Acting Chief, Facility Constructicn
-
'
k.
and Engineering Support Branch
..
Date
.
.
.
_
.
.
.\\
{
\\
.
-
.
7904upN,49g yg yy
.
_
)
-
,
,
-
_
.----..n.
.
..
_...
_. _ _.
.
.
.
..
em
-
.
Sit'riARY OF Fl!;DII:GS Enfnrc -ent Action None Licensee Action en Previous 1v ldentified F.nf orcement Matters
?:o t Inspected Unusual occurrences Sone Identified Des f on Chances Sone Identified Other Sicnificant Findincs
.
A.
Current Findines The licensee's Quality Assurance Manual was exacined by the 1.
inspector. No deficiencies were identified. (Details, Paragrcph 4)
2.
The estinated construction ccepletion was reported as 35% as of October 1, 1973. (De tails, Paragraph 2)
3.
'Ihe, FS AR is scheduled for cocpletion in October,1973. (Details, Paragraph 3)
4.
Tae work in progress on the construction of the containment structure was examined by the inspector. No deficiencies were identified. (Details, Paragraph 5)
3.
Status of Previorsiv Recorted Unresolved Itens
-
1. ' The water which had leaked into the reactor vessel was analyzed and found harmless, and the vessel was cleared. This item is resolved. (Details, Paragraph 6)
Manacement Interview interview was held at the site on October 2,1973.
A managenent 1etsonnel Attending
General Public Utilities Service Corporation (CPUSC)
Mr. B. G. Avers, Manager, Quality Assurance
Mr. W. T. Gunn, Site Project Manager Mr. R. W. Heward, Jr., Proj ect Manager n <j ofQ
-
i l
(se u
'
.
s
- ' *
N N
- -
e ae y
eg
- me
ge em
.
_;_
Mr. G. L. Fosby, Quality Assurance Engineer fir. U. S. Shepherd, Proj ect Engineer, Unit 2 Mr. M. 1 Stronberg, Site Quality Assurance Auditor J. E. W ri gh t, Quali ty Assurance Site Manager
.
"r.
J. H. W ri gh *., R e s i d e n t Engineer United Entineers and Cons tructors (UELC)
Mr. V. E. Cich ecki, Quality As s urance /Quali ty Centrol Coordinator Mr. N. A. Vitale, As s is t ant Quality Centrol Supervisor Burns and Roe Mr. D. L. McAfee, Quality Assurance Engineer, Mechanical Gilbert Auociates (CAI)
_
.
Mr. R. H. Fleming, Site Coordinator The f ollowing subj ects were discussed:
A.
The inspector stated that the reported in-leakage of water in the re actor vessel had been resolved during the inspection. The licensee acknculedged this information. (Details, Paragraph 6)
B.
The licensee stated that construction was considered to be 35% corolete, and that fuel loading was scheduled for April,1976. (Details, Paragraph 2)
.
-
C.
The licensee stated that the FSAR was scheduled for completion in Octob er, 1973.
D.
The inspector stated that he had reviewed the Quality Assurance Manual during the inspection, and no deficiencies had been identified. The licensee acknowledged this information. (Details, Paragrap' 4)
E.
The inspector stated that during the inspection he had examined the work in progress on the cons truction of the containment s tructure.
No deficiencies were identified. The licensee acknowledged this information. (Details, Paragraph 5)
_
i
.
[
_
r m.) 919 g
v.s
.
_
... _.
..
,..,
.
-. ~ _.
_... _ _
.
DETAILS 1.
Personn Centacted meral Public Utilities Service Corocration (CPUSC)
Mr. L. r.. Avers, Manager, Quality Assurance Mr. W. T. Gunn, Site Project Manager
'ir. R. W Hew rd, Jr., Project "anater Mr. r..
L. Kepp, Quali ty Assurance Ececialist Mr. S. Levin, Project Engineer, Unit 1 Mr. P. Levine, Quality Assurance Engineer Mr. C. L. Ros'ry, Qualti - Assurance Engineer Mr. W. S. Shepherd, Project Engineer, Unit 2 Mr. M. J. Strc6 erg, Site Quality Assurance Auditor Mr. J. E. Wright, Quality Assurance Site Manager Mr. J. H. Nright, Resident Engineer
.
United Entinects and Cons tructors
'
-
Mr. V. E. Cichocki, Quality Assurance / Quality Control Coordinator
"r. J. Flening, Startup Engineer, Electrical Mr. U. A. Vitale, Assis tant Quali ty Control Supervisoi'
Eurns and Roe
-
Mr. D. L. McAfee, Ouality Assurance Engineer, Mechanical Gilbert Associates (GAI)
Mr. R. H. Fleming, Site Coordinator Mr. D. D. Krause, Structural Engineer Mr. K. E. Modland, Project Engineer, Civil
-
2.
Cons truction Schedule
-
The licensee estimated construction as 35" co=plete, as of October,
1973.
The expected date of fuel loading remains unchanged, April, 1976.
3.
Final Safety Analysis Report The licensee expects to have the FSAR conpleted in October,1973,
- this schedule may be delayed 1-2 months.
.
_
m I
-
.
g - s.'e O v.c 9T
_.
%
w.
- - -
.-
-
--_-g--
_
.
-4-4.
1.i cene,ee 's nuali ty tzsurnnte "anual The licensce's Quality assurance Manual, Unit 2, was reviewed during this inspection.
The manual was originally issued in Septenber,
'*69.
The current issue was Revision 5, Augus t, 1973. The 10 CFR 50,
..ppendix 3 recuirenents were f ound to be included in the nanual.
^
The licensee stated that current 1v there was no major revision to the ca,ual in preparatien, altho 1:h some changes would be rade in order to provide concurrenco aith the FSAR ahich is scheduled f or distribution in Octcber, 1973.
The inspecter noted considerable complexity in the categorization of the OA pregran into Levels 1, II, and III; the rategories 1, 2, 3,
and 4 in the QC program; the Cases A and B depencing upon UELC's function as Cons truction Manager or Construction Contractor.
The licensee stated that this sys tem had proven ef fective in controlling quality, and was thoroughly understood by the QC and QA personnel who used the sys ten.
,
_
The inspector stated that he had not examined the implementation of the OA Manual at this inspection but that this would be done at a subsequent ins p e c tion.
5.
Centainment structure The inspector examined the' fol.'.owing areas involved in the construction of the containment structure:
a.
Concrete pumping, tes ting and placement b.
Tendon sheathing s torage and ins tal' ation c.
Containment liner welding and weld repair d.
Concrete QC records e.
Reinforcirg steel placement
_
f.
Cadwelding of reinforcing steel No deficiencies were identified.
.
6.
Water in Reactor Pressure Vessel The licensee had notified the inspector on May 14, 1973 that 18" to 24" of water was discovered in the reactor pressure vessel during the construction phase. It was deter =ined that the water had accumulated from in-leakage of rain water through two uncovered monitor tubing enetrations.
-
.
_
t., esti I ##
_
,
,.
p
_.
p ee, eee e
en
ge er e = = =
=w
. -. - -
.
.
F-5-The inspector examined the vessel penetrations, which since been covered. Tne analysis of the accunulated water was:
Cnlorides 14 parts per nillion Sulfates 8.6 parts per rillion Conductivity 1550 nhos This iten is resolved.
O
_
e
.
.
.
0 /w.M r.,,
g,j L.
.
v
..
-
.
.
. _, _ -
- -...
,..