IR 05000302/1988004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-302/88-04 on 880111-14.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Inservice Insp
ML20149H586
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/04/1988
From: Blake J, Economos N
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149H583 List:
References
50-302-88-04, 50-302-88-4, NUDOCS 8802220010
Download: ML20149H586 (6)


Text

~

>S Kic ' UNITED STATES O'

/ k' '

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 18

'"

3 -

101 MARIETTA STREET, * *'- 2 ATL ANTA, GEORGI A 30323

%, ...../

Report No.: 50-302/88-04 Licensee: Florida Power Corporation 320134th Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Docket No.: 50-302 License No.: DPR-72

'

Facility Name: Crystal River 3 Inspection 'ct January 11-14, 1988

,

,j !.

Inspecto . '

e W //%

4 44 s Date Signed Approved t$y:\ # '/ '

J/. Blake, Section Chief Date Signed gineering Branch

/ vision of Reactor Safety .

SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection was in the areas of Inservice Inspection (ISI) of pump and valves including administrative control procedures, surveillance procedures and data analysi ,

Results: In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identifie f l

l l

l l

l

u kr

- ~. ,

.-

8802220010 880205

.

' PDR ADOCK 05000302 40 DCD g - . , _ _ _ .

-

..

T

,

REPORT DETAILS

, Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • F. R. Bailey, Projects Superintendent
  • D. H. Beach, Site Nuclear Engineering
  • P. D. Breedlove, Records Management Supervisor W. R. Candy, Nuclear ISI Specialist
  • J. Cooper, Jr., Nuclear Technical Support Superintendent '
  • P. G. Haines, Nuclear Licensing Specialist
  • P. F. McKee, Director Nuclear Plant Operations W. G. Neuman, Supervisor ISI Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, and office personne NRC Resident Inspectors

'

"J. E. Tedrow i t

  • Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 14, 1988, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 abov The inspector ;

described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection

findings. Dissenting comments were not received from the license Proprietary information is not contained in this repor . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspectio l Inservice Testing of Pumps and Valves (73756)

i The inspector selectively interviewed responsible personnel, reviewed procedures, and reviewed records related to inservice testing of pumps and valves to evaluate the licensee's compliance with commitments and regulatory requirements - including the requirements of ASME Section XI (74575), the inservice testing code specified by 'iechnical Specification 4.0.5 and 10 CFR 50.55a(g). Details of the interviews, reviews and observations are described belo ,

__

.

.

'

m A -

.- 2 The inspector interviewed Licensee / Contractor personnel and reviewed the below listed documents to verify that responsibilities have been assigned to persons and organizations for: preparation, review, and approval of IST procedures; _ scheduling of IST for normal and increased frequency -testing; performance of testing per approved procedures; performance of post-maintenance - and post modification IST; proper certification and calibration of IST instruments; and training for those personnel- responsible for implementing IST procedures.

J Documents Reviewed CP-102, Rev. 15- Inservice Inspection Pump and Valve Data Review and Corrective Action PM-200, Rev. 0 Instrument Calibration Recall Program SP-409, Rev. 11 Annual Bearing Temperature Acquisition for Section XI Pumps SP-410, Rev. 20 Valve Testing During Refueling Outages

.

SP-435, Rev. 21 Valve Testing Ducing Cold Shutdown SP-443 Crystal River Master Surveillance Plan SP-448, Rev. 5 Master Surveillance Schedule for Preventive *

Maintenance Testing of ISI Pumps SP-449, Rev. 9 Master Surveillance Schedule for Preventive Maintenance Testing of ISI Containment Isolation Valves SP-602, Rev. 14 ASME Section XI Relief Valve Testing SP-620, Rev. O Mechanical Exercising of BSV-26 and BSV-27 SP-650, Rev. 15 ASME Code Safety Valves Test Inservico Test Procedure Content ,

The inspector reviewed a sample of the licensee's Inservice Testing procedures (IST), to verify that the following attributes were specified:

(1) valid test criteria for the components being tested l (2) evaluations of imposing and removing increased frequency testing requirements

$

e

, ..

'

.

-i

.. 3

'

(3) pump vibre. ion test data analysis and acceptance criteria justification, including location of vibration measurement

'

(4) requirements that pump tests be conducted at reference conditions, including reference speed -

,.

(5) compliance of test instruments to 10 CFR 50 and ASME ' Code

<

requirements

'

(6) requirements that testing of Category B, C, and D valves 1-

.

include: >

-

performance of positive testing of Category C check valves whose safety function is to open and close (i.e., full stroke verification in both' directions and individual

quantitative' leak rate testing where applicable)

-

observation of remote position indicators, at least once every two years to veri fy that valve operation -is accurately indicated ,

-

ir;dication that valve stroke times are commensurate with i the capabilities of the valve tested The procedures reviewed by the inspector for the above attributes were as follows:

procedure N Revision Title I SP-340B B Train ECCS Pump and Valve Operability Check  ;

SP-344B 4 Nuclear Services Closed Cycle Cooling B-Train Quarterly Operability Surveillance

SP-344C 3 Nuclear Services Containment Cooling System Supply -

,

Operability Surveillance

,

Emergency Feedwater Operability

'

SP-349A 2 -

l Check i

SP-349B 2 Emergency Feedwater Post Maintenance c. IST Records  !

l The inspector reviewed documentation of previously performed pump / valve Performance Tests (pts) to verify conformance with applicable procedure requirements and evaluation in accordance vtth '

requirements of ASME Section XI: ,

,

I

. - - - - - , , - , -

,_. - . , , , , - . . - .

_ . _. _ -

. ,-

,

,s

.

..

. 4-

,

ASME Size Ac <

Component Ca (Inches) Type Date Tested

,

DHV-12 Decay Heat B 4 MO 9/26/86, 6/27/87, Removal 12/30/87 SWV-35 Nuclear B 8 A 5/27/87, 8/26/87, Services Closed 12/24/87 Cycle Cooling

SWV-41 Nuclear B 8 A 8/26/87, 5/27/87,

, Services Closed 12/24/87-

,

Cycle Cooling i CAV-1 Liquid A 3/8 A 4/17/87, 4/18/37, Sampling 1/10/88 ASV-5 Aux. Steam B 4 MO 1/22/87 ASV-204 Aux. Steam B 4 MO 1/22/87 j

~

ASV-196 Aux. Steam B 4 SO 1/11/87, 3/20/87,. !

7/19/P'

l MSV-33 liain Steam C 6 SA 1/7/ ,

Code Safety i

~

MSV-37 Main Steam 'C 6 SA 1/7/88

, Code Safety

!'

MSV-42 Main Steam C 6 SA 1/7/88 Code Safety  ;

i MSV-46 Main Steam C 6 SA 1/7/88  !

i Code Safety l

!

Pumps  !

Component Surveillance Procedure Surveillance Dates

.

RWP-2B Emergency SP-334B, Rev. 4 7/28/87, 9/16/87, 1 Nuclear Service 12/26/87  :

Seawater l SWP-1B Nuclear SP-344C, Rev. 3 8/12/87, 9/8/87, >

Services Closed 12/24/87 '

!

Cycle Cooling I

I

- . __ . _ , _ . _ . _ .

.

. . c

- 5 "

,

s 5,  ;

(cont'd) Pump Component Surveillance Procedure' Surveillance Dates DCP-1B' Decay Heat -SP-340B 9/26/86, 9/26/87, l'

Closed Cycle 12/30/8 C?oling EFP-1 Emergency SP-349A, Rev. 2 7/13/87, 8/11/87, Feedwater 9/11/87, 1/1/88 EFP-1 Emergency SP-349B, Rev. 2 7/28/87, 8/31/87, >

Feedwater 9/1/87, 1/1/88

< Within these areas the inspector noted that the licensee's records storage system utilizes ~ microfilm which is suitable for -retrieving

} one or several completed surveillance test procedures for revie However, this system is' not conducive to capturing, updating, and ,

'

presenting test dcta in . terms of graphics or tabular form for analysis and/or review of -previous test value The inspector discussed this matter with the licensee who agreed, and stated that computer equipment has been purchased and a program ' is being established to capture and store test. parameters of interes Within the areas inspected, no deviations or violations were identified, a  !

l -

! I i ,

?

i s

,

!

i  !

) i i

i l

l

. ,,-,___ ,, . _

. _ _ _ - . - . .