IR 05000302/1988022

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-302/88-22 on 880725-29.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Preparedness,Including Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures & Organization & Mgt Control
ML20207G853
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/12/1988
From: Decker T, Testa E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20207G849 List:
References
50-302-88-22, NUDOCS 8808240257
Download: ML20207G853 (7)


Text

e

  1. KfGo UNITED STATES h8 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,

y 'i ' 3, REGION 11 g'

j 101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323 s

\ *****

/

AUG 17 M Report No.: 50-302/88-22 Licensee: Florida Power Corporation 3201 34th Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Docket No.: 50-302 License No.: OPR-72 Facility Name: Crystal River 3 Inspection Conducted: ly 5-29,1988 Inspector:

E. D. Testa dh w 8 88 Date Signed

,

Approved by: [ / AfWh - 8//4[88 T. R. Decker, Section Chief Date Signed 1 Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards i

l SUMMARY l

Scope: This routine, irispection was conducted in the area of emergency preparedness, and included a review of the following programmatic areas (1)

emergency plan and implementing procedures; (2) emergency facilities, equipment, instrumentation, and supplies, (3) organization and management control, (4) training and (5) independent reviews / audit Results: In the areas inspected, no violatiuns or deviations were identifie The findings of this inspection appeared to indicate that the licensee was prepared to respor.d to a radiological emergency involving the Crystal River facility.

8803240257 000817 PDR ADOCK 05000302 G PNV

~

..

.

. .

,

"

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees R. Cardinali, Nuclear Technical Training Supervisor

  • S. Chapin, Radiological Emergency Planning Specialist
  • P. Ellsberry, Nuclear Technical Training Supervisor
  • S. Johson, Manager Site Nuclear Services S. Lashbrook, Health Physics Supervisor
  • Laycock, Radiological Emergency Planning Specialist
  • P. McKee, Director Plant Operations M. Roesch, RN, Site Nurse W. Rossfeld, Manager Nuclear Compliance A. Sanchez, M. D. Site Medical Director ,

K. Spillios, P. A., Physicians Assistant l

  • J. Stephenson, Supervisor Radiological Emergency Planning
  • M. Williams, Nuclear Regulatory Specialist W. Wilson, Shift Supervisor
  • R. Wittman, Operations Superintendent I Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included I engineers, operators, mechanics, security force members, technicians, and administrative personne Other Organizations R. Dugger, Education and Training Specialist, Division of Emergency ,

Management, State of Florida j R. Bri3tol, Radiological Emergency Planning Coordinator, Citrus County

W. Cobb, Director Emergency Management, Levy County

- _ _ .

_- .

7_

  • .

e

. .

,

The inspector reviewed the licensee's system for making changes to the EmergencyPlanandtheEmergencyPlanImplementingProcedures(EPIPs). By a selective review, the inspector verified that the licensee's management approved revisions to the Emergency Plan and the EPIPs issued since September 1, 1987. Controlled copies of the Emergency Plan and EPIPS were examined in the Control Room and found to contain the correct revisio The following revisions to the Emergency- Plan and Procedures were reviewed:

Radiological Emergency Response Plan Rev. 7 2/26/88 Corporate Emergency Support Plan Rev. 32 4/29/88 EM 102 Activation, Operation and Staffing of the Technical Support Center an Operational Support Center, Rev. 18, 5/26/88 EM-202 Duties of the Emergency Coordinator, Rev. 29, 3/10/88 EM 204(A) Release and Off-Site Dose Assessment During Radiological Emergencies at CR-3 (Initial Assessment Method), Rev 7, 4/8/88 EM 204(B) Release and Off-Site Dose Assessment During Radiological Emergencies at CR-3 (Computer Method), Rev. 9 12/01/87

EM 205 Assembly, Evacuation, and Personnel Accountability of Personnel within the CR-3 Frotected Area During Emergencies, Rev. 13,6/2/88 EM 206 Emergency Plan Roster and Notification, Rev. 42, 5/26/88 '

EM 208 Duties of the Radiation Emergency Team, Rev. 13, 4/12/88 ;

i EM 209 Re-Entry Procedure, Rev. 7, 4/12/88 EM 210 Duties of the Environmental Survey Team, Rev. 13, 4/12/88 EM-213 Medical Emergency Procedure, Rev. 13,4/12/88 EM 216 Duties of the Nuclear Plant Fire Brigade, Rev. 14, 6/2/88 EM 217 Duties of the Sampling Team, Rev. 3, 7/22/87 l

!

EM 218 Duties of the Emergency Repair Team, Rev.3, 7/22/87 l

EM 219 Duties of the Dose Assessment Team, Rev. 6, 12/29/87

\

PM-172 Inspection of Plant Safety Equipment, Rev. 1, 6/7/88 SP-188 Technical Support Center Emergency Ventilation System Testing, Rev. O, 2/15/88 l

,

, J

.

. .

,

-

SP-359 TSC Diesel Generator Surveillance Testing, Rev. 1, 2/15/88 HPP 409 Inventory and Availability of Emergency Supplies / Equipment, Rev. 5, 5/26/88 The inspector reviewed the licensee's agreement letters with offsite agencies and found them curren No violations or deviations were identifie . Emergency Facilities, Equipment, Instrumentation, and Supplies (82701) !

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b) (8) and (9), 10 CFR 50.54(q), and Section I of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 60, this area was inspected to determine whether the licensee's emergency response . facilities and other essential !

emergency equipment, instrumentation, and supplies were maintained in a state of operational readiness, and to assess the impact of any change in this area upon the emergency preparedness progra The inspector selectively examined emergency supplies and equipment in the I Control Room, Technical Support Center (TSC), Operational Support Center (0SC), and Emergency Operations Facility (E0F). The inspector, during the inspection of emergency medical supplies, determined that the Trauma Kit I stored in the Control Room was not periodically inventoried or maintaine '

This item was identified as an Inspector Followup Item (IFI).

IFI (50-302/88-22-01): Include the Control Room Trauma Kit on a routine surveillance checklist to ensure its readines The inspector selectively reviewed the surveillance test records of the TSC Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning System and E0F Emergency *

Diesel Generator. The records of the EOF Emergency Diesel Generator weekly test from September 14, 1984 to November 20, 1987 were reviewe The Emergency Diesel Generator was no longer run each week after that dat The Emergency Diesel Generator had not been operateJ using a surveillance procedure nor was there a preventative maintenance program for the uni The operating time clock indicated that the unit had been on approximately 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> since the end of the formal records (11/20/87).

The lack of a surveillance procedure and a preventive maintenance program were identified as an IFI, IFI (50-302/88-22-02): Include the E0F Emergency Diesel Generator in a surveillance procedure and develop a preventative maintenance program for the uni The inspector selectively reviewed the Alert and Notification System test results for Levy and Citrus Counties for the 3rd and 4th Quarter of 1987, and the 1st and 2nd Quarter of 1988. Results from the tests indicated an acceptable level of siren availabilit No violations or deviations were identifie e

.

. .

,

4 Organization and Management Control (82701)

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) and (16) and Section IV.A of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, this area was inspected to determine the effects of changes in the licensee's emergency response organization and/or management control systems on the emergency preparedness program, and to verify that such changes were properly factored into the Emergency Plan implementing procedur The organization and management of the emergency preparedness program were reviewed and discussed with a licensee representativ The licensee ,

stated that there were no significant changes onsite or at the Corporate I Office that directly impacted emergency preparedness. The Citrus County l E0C has been relocated from Inverness to a new facility at Lecanto which !

is about 13 miles from the plant. Discussion with the Director Emergency l Management, Levy County, Radiological Emergency Planning Coordinator l Citrus County and Education and Training Specialist from the Division of l Emergency Management of the State of Florida indicated that a satisfactory I relationship existed between the licensee and Levy and Citrus Counties and !

the Division of Emergency Management of the State of Florid j No violations or deviations were identifie l Training (82701)

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) and (15),Section IV.F of Appendix E to 4 10 CFR Part 50, and Section 19 of the Emergency Plan, this area was .

inspected to determine whether the licensee's key emergency response !

personnel were properly trained and understood their emergency responsibilitie The inspector conducted an interview in the Control Room with the Shift Supervisor on duty. The Shift Supervisor was given several sets of hypothetical emergency conditions and plant data and was asked in each case to talk through the response he would provide as Emergency Coordinator if such an emergency actually existed. The individual exhibited a broad knowledge of the Emergency Plan and EPIPs. No problems were observed in the areas of event classification and protective action decision making. During the walk through the inspector noted that the guidelines for Potassium Iodide distribution as stated in Policy Number 24 of the Florida Power Corporation Company Policy Manual were not made available to the Emergency Coordinator in a timely manner. This was identified as an IF IFI (50-302/88-22-03) Ensure the guidance contained in Florida Power and Company Policy Manual Policy No. 24 titled "Postassium Iodide use for Radiation Emergency Workers," is made available to the Emergency Coordinato The inspector selectively reviewed the lesson plans, examinations and test results for Emergency Coordinator Training and Emergency Sample Team

.-. .

i ,

!

-

i

. .

,

l

Trainin Approximately 46 training records in these areas were reviewed and no problems were foun The inspector reviewed the General Employee Training lesson plans, examination and test results to determine if the material contained in Procedure EM-201 titled "Duties of an Individual who Discovers an Emergency," were covered. No problems were found. The inspector selectively reviewed the training records of 13 licensee personnel defined as Corporate Positions and found no problems. The inspector selectively reviewed 43 training records of Crystal River Units 1 and 2 personnel trained during July 1988, on Emergency Classification and Coal Plant Assembly, Accountability, and Evacuation. The training ,

records of 32 personnel from Units 4 and 5 trained during June 1988, on '

Emergency Classification and Coal Plant Assembly, Accountability, and Evacuation were reviewed and no problems were foun The inspector selectively reviewed the training records and lesson plan used to conduct the Public Information Training in May 1988, for the Division of Emergency Management for the State of Florida and Citrus and Levy Countie No problems were foun No violations or deviations were identifie . Independent Reviews / Audits (82701)

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) and (16) and 10 CFR 50.54(t), this area was inspected to determine whether the licensee had performed an independent review or audit of the emergency preparedness program, and whether the licensee had a corrective action system for deficiencies and weaknesses identifie Records of the emergency preparedness program audit were reviewe An independent audit was conducted by the licensee's Quality Programs Department during March 1988, and was documented in Audit Report 88-03-SSUP dated April 22, 198 Five (5) audit findings and eight (8)

concerns were identified during the audit involving Emergency Preparednes The identified findings in the audit report were being tracked for response and closecut. None of the identified items appear to reduce the effectivenesses of the emergency preparedness progra The inspector selectively reviewed the records associated with the review of the Emergency Action Levels (EAls) by the State of Florida Division of i Emergency Management, State of Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, and Citrus and Levy Counties. No problems were I identifie '

The inspector reviewed the 1988 Critique of Annual Radiological Emergency i Response Plan Exercise Report dated July 20, 1988, and noted that l improvement items were assigned to be tracked by the Nuclear Compliance Department. Projected completion dates had not yet been establishe No violations or deviations were identifie I

,

l

_- ,

,

L

,

s .

6 Action on Previous Inspection Findings (92701) (Closed) IFI 50-302/87-23-01: Verify 24. hour Emergency response personnel augmentation times by periodic announced and unannounced drill A selective review of an October 1987 augmentation drill indicated that acceptable response times could be achieved. Section 5.2.7 of the Emergency Plan, titled Shift Augmentation Drills committed to unannounced drills during off hour . Exit Interview These inspection scope and results were summarized on July 29, 1988, with thase persons indicated in Paragraph 1. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection results listed belo Although reviewed during the inspection, proprietary information is not contained in this repor Dissenting comments were not received from the license Item Number Description and Reference 50-302/88-22-01 Inspector Fol'owup Item - Include the Control Room Tramua Kit on a routine surveillance checklist to ensure its readiness, Paragraph /88-22-02 Inspector Followup Item -

Include the E0F Emergency Diesel Generator in a surveillance ;

procedure and develop a preventative maintenance program for the unit, Paragraph )

,

50-302/88-22-03 Inspector Followup Item - Ensure the guidance i contained in Florida Power Company Policy Manual ]

Policy No. 24 titled Potassium Iodide Use for l Radiation Emergency Workers is made available to the Emergency Coordinator, Paragraph !

Licensee management was informed that one IFI discussed in Paragraph 8 was l considered close i

-- , _ .