IR 05000285/1980018
| ML19345D368 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 10/22/1980 |
| From: | Hunnicutt D, Yandell L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345D367 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-285-80-18, NUDOCS 8012120570 | |
| Download: ML19345D368 (4) | |
Text
-~
U. S. NUCI. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
Report No. 50-285/80-18 Docket No. 50-285 License No. DPR-40 Licensee:
Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Facility Name: Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 Inspection at: Fort Calhoun Station, Blair, Nebraska and Omaha Public Power District Offices, Omaha, Nebraska Inspection conducted: September 30 - October 3, 1980 Inspectors:
k e. ek
/C/4.2.[fC D. M. Hunnicutt, Chief
' Date Reactor Projects Section No. 2
!
/0 2WSO
<
v L. A. Yandell, Reactor Inspector
'Date'
Reacto-Projects Section Approved by:
kj whY
/c/2.R/fC D. M. Hunnicutt, Chief
'Date'
Reactor Projects Section No. 2 Inspection Summarv Inspection conducted during the period of September 30 - October 3.1980 (Report No. 50-285/80-18)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannot :ced inspection of the document control program and surveillance of pipe support and restraint systems.
The inspection involved thrity-nine (39) inspector-hours on-site by two (2) NRC inspectors.
Results: Within the two areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were noted.
80121205 N
.
.
.
.
- -
-
.
..-
..
-
.
.
.. _.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- R. Andrews, Section Manager, Operations M. Eidem, Manager, Generation Station Engineering, Mechanical J. Fisicaro, Supervisor, Administrative Services J. Flueln, Supervisor, Mechanical Technical Services
- J. Gloshen, QA Engineer
- R. Jaworski, Section Manager, Technical Services L. Kusek, Technical Supervisor R. Livingston, Supervisor, Generation Station Engineering, Administrative Services
- K. Morris, Manager, Administrative Services R. Mueller, Electrical Engineer
.
- T. Patterson, Licensing Administrator G. Peterson, Maintenance Supervisor T. Pirruccello, Manager, Generation Station Engineering, Electrical
- S. Stevens, Manager, Fort Calhoun Station
- F. Thurtel, Division Manager, Environmental and Regulatory Affairs
- D. Wittke, Section Manager, Generation Station Engineering (GSE)
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
Document Control Program The inspector reviewed the administrative procedures established for drawing control, and those procedures established for ensuring that drawings, manuals, technical specifications and the plant operating manual were maintained current. The inspector selectel a representative sample of drawings and procedures to verify that these documents were
,
up to date and consistent with the site master file copy.
!
The inspector noted that standing order C-5, Fort Calhoun Print Files, i
is not current with the manner in which the site files are being handled.
i In particular, form A-9-3 is no longer used to sign off receipt of draw-
'
ings, superseded drawings not returned to GSE but destroyed, and parts of the plant file are now being maintained in other places than the ones
,
l identified in Section 3.1.
A review of selected items indicated that I
the print handling and storage system was being administered properly
!
despite the outdated procedure. This will remain an open item until the revised procedure has been issued.
(0 pen Item 285/8018-01)
GSE procedure A-2, Modification Request Development, step 2.11.1, assigns
.
to that organization the responsibility for revising "all applicable
'
documents (especially the Master File Tracings) to reflect the modifications
~.
__
.
.
,
as installed..
The inspector noted that although a system has
"
..
been developed for handling incoming Modification Completion Reports (MCR),
distributing them to appropriate engineering groups, collecting the revised drawings f,r reproduction and distribution, and storage of the orignal documents, no formal procedure has been issued to contrcl these evolutions.
A representative sample of MCR's and drawings were reviewed for accounta-bility and proper handling, and no discrepancies were identified. The system appears to be working, but any effort pertaining to control of safety related documentation at Fort Calhoun Station should be documented in a procedure. This will remain an open item until these evolutions are
incorporated into a procedure and issued by the licensee.
(0 pen Item
'
285/8018-02)
I
.
The inspector noted that recommended time intervals for MCR sign off and drawing update were not being met.
This was also the subject of a Fort Calhoun Station QA audit (80-ERA /QA-144) in August of-this year.
At present, the system is cumbersome and fails to provide the Fort Calhoun Station with updated documents.in a timely manner. Turn around time at GSE is in the order of several months rather than the suggested six weeks, causing the site to work from drawings that have been updated by hand.
In like manner, MCR's are not being signed off in the recommended two week time frame and this hampers GSE's efforts to provide revised drawings to the site. The licensee is aware of this and is evaluating various methods to improve the situation so that the plant site will be better served with up-to-date information.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in these areas.
3.
Surveillance of Pipe Support and Restraint Systems The inspector reviewed the surveillance program, procedures and schedule pertaining to the pipe supports and restraint systems at Fort Calhoun 8:ation.
The inspector verified that required inspection intervals have been established, and reviewed the inspection results from the 1980 re-fueling outage. The pipe restraints have been cate;orized as " accessible" and " unaccessible" as allowed for in the Technical Specifications, and the ST-HSS surveillance procedures have been burden down in this manner.
The inspector verified that the procedures required a hydraulic fluid level examination. The inspector witnessed the testing of a shock sup-pressor on the test stand and reviewed the PM program established by the licensee for snubbers. The licensee does not test the hydraulic fluid for viscosity or contamination, but purchases only the oil recommended by the manufacturer's technical manual. The inspector performed a visual inspection on a representative sample of shock suppressors and pipe supports, and found them to be satisfactory.
The inspector briefly reviewed the program and procedures established to examine pipe supports and restraints identified in the Inservice Inspection Program.
. _.
,
_ _, __
_
_ _ _ _ _
,
_ _
-_ _
___ _
_
,
. _ -.
_ _ _ _ _.
._.. _. _ _ __..
_.
.
_. _.. _ _ _ ___
_
.
.
,
t
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in these areas.
4.
Exit Interview
!
.
An exit meeting denoted in paragraph 1 of this report was conducted on
'
October 3, 1980 with OPPD personnel to summarize the scope of the in-spection and the findings.
i i
t t
j
}
-
I
1, h
e
.
.
-.. ~. - -., _ _..,., _ _ _,.,,,,
., _,
.__.,,..m.,._,,
,,..,_ _....... _,. _. _,,...., -
..__,...,_.y...,.
,,m,,-,,-
,, _,, _,..... ~ _... _ _,.,
_