IR 05000275/1981024
| ML16340C057 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1981 |
| From: | Carlson J, Mendonca M, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16340C056 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-81-24, NUDOCS 8111020470 | |
| Download: ML16340C057 (8) | |
Text
!
Report Ho.
E
.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSI,i OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION V
Docket Ho.
Licensee:
License No.
Safeguards Group Facility Name:
Inspection at; Inspection conducted:
Inspectors:
J n D.
arl Marvin Mendo n,
Sr R
ca, Res de g)-rg-g'/
dent e ctor Inspector Date Signed io -/3- ~l Date Signed React r Inspector pproved By:
Tolbert Young Reactor Proje r
~,
C ief, s
Sec ion
'2 Date Signed Id-~3-P/
Date Signed Ins ection of Au ust
1981 to October 2,
1981 (Re ort No.
50-275/8'1'-24)
Areas Ins ected:
Routine inspection including plant tours, preoperational testing, implementation controls, comparison.
of as-built plant to FSAR description, preoperational test witnessing, outstanding items review, testing of pipe support and restraint systems, emergencey planning preoperational tests and training;'adiation protection preoperational testing, task action plan requirements, radioactive waste systems preoperational tests, and plant procedure reviews.
This inspection involved 115 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC resident inspectors.
This report completes the require-ments for preoperational testing inspection per MC 2593.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
RV Form 219 (2)
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- R. Thornberry, Plant Manager
+R. Patterson, Plant Superintendent J
~
S.
Diamonon, Quality.,Control Supervisor
+J.
M. Gisc1on, Power Pla'ht Engineer
'D.
Q. Backens, Supervisor-,of Maintenance
>J.
A. Sexton Supevisor of Opexations
- J. U.. Boots, Supervisor 'of Chemistry'and Radiat'ion Protection
~C.
M. Seward, Acting Supervi'soi,of<Quality Assurance (QA)
- M. B. Kaefer, Technical Ass'ist'ant.to the'~ Plant Manager
- L. G. Lunsford, Securi'ty"Superv'isor
'r The inspectors also 'talked 'withand"',i'n'tervyewed a number of other licensee employees including,me'mber's'of'eneral construc-tion, the operationssta'ff, and 'QA'personnel.
'I
<<Denotes those attending the exit interview.
J'
2.
Plant Tour
The inspectors walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly basis to observe activities in progress; to inspect the general state of cleanliness, housekeeping, and adherence to fire protection rules; to check the p'roper approval of
"man on the line, caution and clearance" tags on equipment, and to review with operations personnel the status of various systems in the plant.
/
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Procedur'es Procedures reviewed:
OP-0 OP-1 OP-2 OP-3A CAP A-6 NPAP E-4 Reactor Trip with Safety Injection Loss of Coolant Accident Loss of Secondary Coolant Steam Generator Tube Rupture Gasous-Radwaste Discharge Management Procedures 4.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Prep erati'o'n Test'm lementation 'Controls The inspectors verified by record review and/ox observation that:
(a) jurisdictional controls were being observed for
C r
I t
t I
,t I'
b v
W 7,',
\\k r
b b
bI tl l
Cl II system turnover, (b)
t'a'g'ging 'wa's 'acco'mplished consistent with jurisdictiopal controls of the administrative procedures,,
and (c) controls were being observed prior to and subsequent to testing.
A'schedule is being, maintained for preoperational testing and updated when necessary.,
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Com arison of As-Built Plant to FSAR "Descri tion This report completes this topic.
The containment spray and containment fan cooler systems were walked-down and found to be in agreement with drawings under quality control per FSAR design and commitments.
Further, the instrumentation and controls drawings for these systems and the systems previously walked-down, i.e., high, intermediate, and low head safety injection and the accumulator systems, were verified to be in conformance with the FSAR.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were'dentified.
Preo erational Tes't'itnessin Based on past observation of preoperational tests this inspection is complete.
b No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Outstandin Items Review Conservatism of EP OP44 Appendix A Venting Time Period (81-22-01; closed).
An acceptable response to the calulational conservatism question was received from Westinghouse via PG6E.
This item is closed.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Prep erational Testin of Pi e
Su ort and Restraint S stems A group of saf ety related pipe support and restraint systems were observed under cold conditions.
The inspection showed all observed systems to be functional.
These observations will be used as baseline data for comparison with data taken after heatup and transient testing.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
b.
b b
f J
I b
1"
'f g)
lf
'
r>>
J I
II I
~ l
~
l
k I
I ilf II
~
'v J
l l
II
~
1f
~
~
i3 9.
Emer enc Plannin Tests and Trainin Observations and participation in emergency drills and emergency planning training have shown the licensee's emergency organization and procedures to be acceptable.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
10.
Radiation Protection Prep erational Observation and participation in xadiation protection training has shown the licensee's program to be acceptable.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
ll.
TAP item II.F.2 Inade uate Core Coolin Instruments The required prerequisites for fuel load have been completed.
The remaining requirements will be addressed per the January 1,
1982 implementation date.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
Evaluation of Test Results The inspectors reviewed testing results for the fuel transfer system functional test and the radiation monitoring system preoperational test.
The results were compared to the accep-tance criteria and were found to be within the tolerance specified.
Additionally, the inspector verified the results were reviewed and accepted by the plant staff review committee.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
13.
Exit Interview An inspector met with senior licensee representatives on a
weekly basis and with the representatives (denoted in Para-graph 1) at the exit interview on September 2S, 1981.
The scope and findings of the inspection.=were summarized by the inspectors.
The inspectors informed~the licensee that the NRC program for preoperational testing was complete for Unit No.
1 and the startup/power ascension testing 'program, along with the operational phas,e program, would be im'plemented.
In addition, the licensee, w'as.,informed tha't'lL~NRC items on the fuel load punch list,.were co'mplete.,'
I tl
)
-o
. ~
)'
1i J
W y
~
"
W W
I W
W P
W