IR 05000275/1981007
| ML17083A876 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 04/09/1981 |
| From: | Bagaglio M, Mendonca M, Sternberg D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17083A875 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-81-07, 50-275-81-7, 50-323-81-07, 50-323-81-7, NUDOCS 8105200418 | |
| Download: ML17083A876 (8) | |
Text
50-275/81.-'07 50-323/81-07 U, S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEHENT
REGION V
Peport No.
License No.
Licensee:
50-275>>
50-323 Priority CPPR39, CPPR69 Category Pacific Gas and Electric Company Facility Name:
Inspection at:
Inspection conduct d:
P.
O.
Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94106 Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2 Diablo Canyon Site, San Luis Obispo County, California Harch 1-31, 1981 Inspectors:
Tolbert Young Jr.,
Se r Resid i t ctor Inspector D te igned Hario agagl Jr.,
'ent eactor Inspector H
in Hen
~ ca, Resident Reactor Inspector Approved by:
.'l'4
~
D. H. Sternberg, Chic, Reactor Pro)ects Section
Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch D te Signed dl Date Signed Dat Signed Summary:
Inspection of Harch 1-31 1981 Re ort Nos. 50-275/81-07
& 50-323/81-07)
Areas Ins ected:
Routine inspection of.preoperational testing nuality assurance, plant tours, fuel storage and security, procedure reviews, preoperational test program - implementation controls, fuel loading prerecuisites>>
and followup of outstanding items.
This inspection involved 110 inspector-hours onsite by three NRC resident inspectors.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
IE:>> Form 219 (1)
,3
DETAILS Persons Contacted
<<R. Thornberry, Plant Manager
<<R. Patterson, Plant Superintendent
<<J.
S. Diamonon, QC Supervisor
<<J. H. Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer
<<R. N, Nanninga, Power Production Engineer
<<J.
A. Sexton, Supervisor of Operations
<<C.
>I. Seward, QA Engineer
<<J.
V. Boots, Supervisor of Chemistry and Radiation Protection
<<L. G. Lunsford, Security Supervisor The inspectors also talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including members of general construction, the operations staff and QA personnel.
<<Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Plant Tour The inspectors walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly basis to observe activities in progress; to inspect the general state of cleanli-ness, housekeeping and adherence to fire protection rules; to check the proper approval of "man of the line, caution and clearance" tags on enuipment, and to review with operation personnel the status of various systems in the plant.
The inspectors noted that the status of the systems and the housekeeping appeared consistent with construction activities.
The reactor cavity is still being maintained as a clean area.
Cleanliness and housekeeping of the plant is still improving.
No items of noncom'pliance.or deviations were identified.
Preooeration Test Pro ram Controls The inspectors verified by record review and/or observation that (a) juris-diction controls were being observed for system turnover, (b) tagging was being accomplished consistent with jurisdictional controls of the adminis-trative procedures and (c) controls were being observed prior to and subset,uent to testing.
A schedule is being maintained for preoperational testing and updated when necessary.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
A for Preo erational Testin The inspectors examined all QA audit reports of preoperational testing audits conducted within the last three months.
The inspectors verified that the audits were conducted in accordance with approved procedures and that cor-rective actions for all identified discrepancies had been taken.
System
turnover from construction to the startup test group and to the operations division was conducted in accordance with established procedures and administrative controls.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
New Fuel Stora e
Units 1 & 2 The new fuel storage and security was inspected.
The inspector verified that the integrity of the security controls were being maintained and adequate'rocedures were available and enforced; Environmental protection to control dust and debris, and to prevent fuel damage was being maintained.
The inspection ascertained that the recuirements of both special nuclear materials licenses were being met.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Procedure Review An inspector reviewed the following new or revised surveillance test procedures:
STP I-77B Calibration of Steam Generator Blowdown Tank Discharge Flow, Loop 4-61 SP-315C(G)
Battery Terminal Resistance Measurement and Inspection SP-315A(G)
Measurement of Station Security System Battery Pilot Cell Voltage SP-315B(G)
Measurement of Station Security System Battery Voltage and Specific Gravity No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Fuel Loadin Prerequisite TAP II.B.4. - Training for Mitigating Core Damage Summary:
Licensees are recuired to develop a training program to teach the use of installed equipment and systems to control or mitigate'accidents in which the core is severely damaged.
Shift tecnical advisors and operating personnel from the plant manager through the operations chain to the licensed operators shall receive all the training indicated in Enclosure 3 to H. R.
Denton's March 28, 1980 letter.
Managers and technicians in the Instru-mentation and control (X&C), health physics, and chemistry departments shall receive training commensurate with their responsibilities.
Applicants for operating licenses should develop a training program prior to'uel loading.
Findings and Conclusions:
The applicant has contracted with Westinghouse to teach the Mitigating Core Damage Training Course.'his training will be conducted the meek of July 20, 1981, and satisfies the renuirement to develop a training program prior to fuel load for operators.
During discussions
t>>
I with the Chemistry/Radiation Protection Supervisor and Power Plant Engineer the inspector determined that the subject training program for technicians in the Instrument and Control (HC), and Chemistry and Radiation Protection (CHIRP) departments has not yet been developed.
Pending development of the aforementioned training program for the I&C and CHIRP departments this TAP will remain open.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Followu of Outstandin Item Boric Acid BA Transfer Pum s (80-09-01, Closed)
The combined flowrate for both BA Transfer Pumps operating in fast speed was measurably less than that stated in t'e FSAR.
The applicant has requested and received from the NSSS documentation which clarifies the minimum acceptable flowrate (20 gpm) for the above pump configuration.
Preoperational test data obtained (92 8 gpm) exceeds the minimum acceptable flowrate stated above.
Accordingly, this open item is considered resolved.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
Exit Interview
~
~
~
The inspectors met with a senior licensee representative on a weekly basis and with the representatives denoted in Paragraph 1 on Harch 27, 1981.
The scope and findings of the inspection were summarized by the inspectors.