IR 05000275/1981003
| ML17083A846 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1981 |
| From: | Bagaglio M, Mendonca M, Sternberg D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17083A847 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-81-03, 50-275-81-3, 50-323-81-03, 50-323-81-3, NUDOCS 8104160310 | |
| Download: ML17083A846 (6) | |
Text
Report No.
50-275/81-03 50-323/81-03 U. S, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION V
o 50 275 p 50-323 Priority CPPR39>
CPPR 69 Category Licensee:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company P. 0,'ox 7442 San Francisco, California 94106 Facility Name:
Inspection at; Inspection conducted Diablo Canyon Units 1 6 2 Diablo Canyon Site, San Luis Obispo County, California February 1-28, 1981 Inspectors:
Tolbe Young Jr.,
Se
'
Reside e.ctor..Inspector 5/
Da e Si ed Mario B
ag o
I-R i a
r Inspector r
Approved by:
Harvin Hendonca, Resident Reactor Inspector D(A5..
D.
M Sternberg, Chi(e
, Reactor Projects Section
Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch D t Signed W ~~//
Date Signed 3 (3 I Date Signed Summary:
Ins ection of Februar 1-28 1981 Re ort Nos. 50-275/81-03 6 50-323/81-03 Areas Inspected:
Routine inspection of preoperational testing and results, plant tours, operator training, procedure reviews.
This inspection involved 77 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC resident inspectors.
Results:
No items oZ noncompliance or deviations sere identidied.
1~.st t:os~
'719 (] )
8 1 0 41,60 g(,+
DETAILS Persons Contacted
<<R. Thornberry, Plant Manager R. Patterson, Plant Superintendent
<<J.
S. Diamonon, QC Supervisor
- J. H. Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer
<<D. A. Backens, Supervisor of Maintenance
<<J.
A. Sexton, Supervisor of Operations
<<R. T. Twiddy, gA Supervisor
- J. V: Boots, Supervisor of Chemistry and Radiation Protection
<<M. B. ICaefer, Technical Assistant to Plant Manager The inspectors also talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including members of general construction, the operations staff and gA personnel.
2.
<<Denotes those attending the exit interview.
Plant Tour The inspectors walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly basis to observe activities in progress; to inspect the general state of cleanli-ness, housekeeping and adherence to fire protection rules; to check the proper approval of "man on the line, caution and clearance" tags on enuipment, and to reveiw with operation personnel the status of various systems in the plant.
The inspectors noted that the status of the systems and the housekeeping appeared consistent with construction activities.
The reactor cavity is still being maintained as a clean area.
Cleanliness and housekeeping of the plant is still improving.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Prep erational Testin and Results a.
Portions of the folio~ ing tests and operations
<~ere witnessed by the inspector:
19.2.11A2 Reactor Cavity Sump Pumps 23.12 Hydrogen Recombiner Preoperational Test 37.14A1 Energize'ressurizer Iieaters from Backup Power b.
Mille witnessing the above testing (in some tests only parts of the tests were being performed or redone),
the inspector verified that the procedures were technically adequate, the latest revisions were available and approved, the overall crew performance was adequate and, in the case of completed tests, the acceptance criteria were met.
Administrative controls for design change and documentation were folio~ e c.
The following preoperati.onal test results were reviewed for proper performance, satisfactory documentation, and conformance of the test results to prescribed acceptance criteria:
14.2A1 Component Cooling Water Pumps Initial Startup 18.1A7 Firewater System Plush No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
0 erator Trainin S.
The operations division is continuing their intensive retraining program for the operators and technical advisors.
The inspectors have monitored some of these classes and will monitor more classes throughout the training program.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Procedure Review An inspector reviewed the following new or revised operating, administrative, chemical analysis, and surveillance test procedures:
EP GA-2 EP GA-6 EP GA-11 CAP C-2 NPAP E-l Supp
STP If-16H STP P"49 STP I-74 STP V-600 STP N-42 EP OP-5 Notification of 0ff Site Emergency Organi sat ions Portable Emergency Eruipment Release of Information to t'e Public Conductivity Analysis Requirements for Retention and Extended St'orage of Operation Phase Activity Records Operation of Slave Relays K644A, K6448, K645A and K6458 Routine Surveillance of Containment Spray Pumps Calibration of Area Temperature Honitoring Systems General Containment Isolation Valve Leak Tests Load Test-~alanipulator Crane and Auxiliary Hoist Reactor Trip Without Safety Injection No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified, 6.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with a senior licensee representative on a weekly basis and ar ith the representatives denoted in Paragraph 1 on Pebruary 19, 1981.
The scope and findings of the inspection. were summarized by the inspector ~
'-