IR 05000255/1990016
| ML20055F231 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 07/06/1990 |
| From: | Creed J, Kniceley J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055F228 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-255-90-16, NUDOCS 9007160115 | |
| Download: ML20055F231 (4) | |
Text
f5
,
( f
,
p
-
,
,
.-
s F
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
- -_
REGION III
Reports No. 50-255/90016(DRSS)
!
h Licenses No. DPR-20 Licensee: Consumers Power Company b
Inspection At:
Palisades Site Covert, Michigan I
Inspection Dates: June 18-22 and 25, 1990 Inspectors:
70[f0 L
'J. R. Kniceley Date L
ysical Security Inspector
'
Approved By:
D f
9.es R. Creed, Chief Date i -
{
<eguards Section n
Inspection Summary
Inspection on June 18-22 and 25, 1990 (Report No. 50-255/90016(DRSS))
"4
-
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced, security inspection involving:
Management Support; Protected and Vital Area Barriers, Detection and assessment aids; Protected and Vital area access Central-Personnel, Package, and Vehicles; Compensatory measurers and training and qualifications-General
>
requirements.
In addition, the inspector reviewed the progress made on the
- <
Security Building modifications and the preparation made for the licensee's SteamGeneratorReplacementProgram(SGRP).
,
Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements withing the areas examined. We have concluded that the licensee's performance meets regulatory requirements and the security program is being well
implemented and managed. Management's involvement in the preparation for the
-
Steam Generator Replacement Project (SGRP) and security program upgrades is evident. Manageinent involvement and support for the security program is
.!
considered a program strength. The experience level and technical competence
.of the security staff is also considered a program strength.
.
.
L
9007160115 900706
PDR ADOCK 05000255
+
'
?
l n
,
t :r
..
m
[m.6.yc97 I
,
r r
'
i.,
a 4
- gs t
.
,
REPORT DETAILS
,
b'm
-
e'
{$.
,
1.-
Key Persons' contacted
'
,
h In addition to the key members of.the licensee's staff listed below,
'
-
W,.
- the inspectors interviewed other licensee employees and members of the ;
'
i:
security' organization. The asterisk (*) denotes those present at the-
-
,,
Exit. Interview conducted on June 22, 1990.
'
ff
.
.
.
.
. *T. Palmisano, Administration and Planning Manager, Consumers Power Co.
k@
.(CPCO.)
!
'
- R. McCaleb, Quality Assurance, CPCO.
- C. Kozup, Licensing Engineer, CPCO.
'
- S~. Cote, Property Protection Superintendent, CPCO.
.
>
,
bc
- G. Balcom, Property Protection Operations Supervisor, CPCO.
t Qbli
- M. Nock, Property Protection Nuclear Security Coordinator, CPC0.
W
- J. Warner, Senior Property. Protection Operator Supervisor, CPC0.
t
'
'
- R. Philips, Fire Protection CPC0.
g
- K. Wallace, Property Protection, Nuclear Security Coordinate, CPC0.
!
- S. Palmucci.. Supervisor. Instrument and Controls, CPCO.
'
V
- D. Zastrow, District Manager, Burns International Security Services Inc'. '
(BISSI)
' t
'
- R. Rank, Site. Manager, BISSI
- J. Silcock, Security Officer, RISSI
- M.. Kempski, Security Of ficer,.RISSI
-
J., Heller, Resident Inspector, NRC
.
2.
Entrance and Exit Interviews (IP 30703)
.
a.
At the-beginning of the inspection, Mr. S. Cote, Property Protection
.
Superintendent was informed of the purpose and scope of this visit and~the functional areas to be examined.
>
b.
The inspectors met with the licensee representatives denoted in
)
Section 1 at the conclusion of the onsite inspection on June'22, i
1990.. A general description of the scope of the inspection wan-
.
provided. Briefly listed below are the findings discussed during the
exit interview. The details of these findings are referenced, as
!
noted, in this report.
included below is a statement provided by or i
describing licensee management's response to each finding.
'
c.
The licensee was advised that the inspection would continue in i
office on June 25, 1990, and include a more through review of the proposed changes to an alarm system.
[
(1) Personnel were advised that no violations or open items were
'
identified during this inspection.
'
'
.
P P
i
r
-
L
..-
j.
'
i
.
.(2) Personnel were edvised that we reviewed the security building i
modifications and preparation for the Steam Generator F
Replacement Project (SGRP), plans appeared to be progressing i
adequately.
(3) On June 25, 1990, the inspector called the licensee's Property Protection Operations Supervisor to confirm that, after discussions with the Region III Safeguards Plant Protection 1.
Analyst, their proposal security building perimeter alarm system meets NRC criteria and is acceptable.
,
3.
Program Areas Inspected (MC0610)
Listed below are the areas which were examined by the inspector within the
,
!
scope of scope of these inspection activities in which no violations, deviations, unresolved or open items were identified. These areas were reviewed and evaluated as deemed necessary by the inspector to meet the specified " Inspection Requirements" (Section 02) of the applicable NRC Inspection Procedure (IP) and the licensee:s approved to the security plan.
Only those areas in which findings were identified as discussed in subsequent report sections.
Sampling reviews included interviews, observations, testing of equipment, document reviews and at times drills
'
or exercises that provide independent verification of your ability to meet security commitments.
The depth and scope of activities were conducted as deemed appropriate and necessary for the program area and operational status of the security system.
- Number Program Area and Inspection Requirements Reviewed 81700 Physical Security Program for Power Reactors
a.
Management Support:
(Ola):
Degree of Management Support;
{0lb)ChangetoSecurityPlansProperlyReportedanddo not Reduce Security Effectiveness; b.
Protected and Vital Area: Corriers:
(02a) PA and VA Barriers Meet Commitments and Piro'7Ide Required Penetration Resistance; (02b) Isolation Zones A tequately Maintained; (02c) Detection Aids Functionally Effective, Meet Commitments, and no Vulnerabilities to Avoid Detection (02d) Assessment Aids Functional and Effective and Meet Commitments; c.
Access Control-Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles:
103a)PositiveAccessControltoinclude:
Proper Identification; Required Personnel Screening Completed; Compliance with Fitness For Duty Commitments; Adequate
'
Search Upon Entering PA; Badges Displayed; Visitors Escorted: Emergency Access to Vital Equipment; VA Access
is Duty Related; (03b) Packages Searched and Properly Authorized; (03b) Packages Searched and Properly Authorized; (03c) Vehicles Properly Authorized. Searched,
,
'
and Controlled; l
-
..
1: e v ';* :,
t
,
$N
'
tv
-
'
.
E'-
. Number Program Area and Inspection Requirements Reviewed-l
!
->
81052 Physical Barriers Protected Areas:
(01) Adequacy of PA 1(
Barriers; (02) PA Barriers; (03) Separation of Barriers; (04) Isolation Zones; (05) Parking Areas; (07) Barrier i
Maintenance, w
i f
81064 Compensatory Measurers:
(01) Development of Compensatory
Measurers; (02)lmployment of Compensatory Measurers;
'
,.
h (03) Effectiveness of Compensatory Measurers.
,
.
R 81070 Access Control Personnel:
(01) General'AccessControl
"
Requirements; (02) Protected Area Access Control; (03) Vital
?
!,.
Area Access Control; (05) Badging; (06) Searching and Search-j
!;
Equipment; (07) Escorting;'(08) Access Control Facilities;and-
"
c Equipment.
!
.
"
'81501 Trainina and Qualification General Requirements:
(01) General l
P; Requirements; (02) Training and Qualification Program; i
.
(03) General Training; (04) Demonstration of Abilities;
!
<
'
(05) Documentation; Knowledges, Skills, and Abilities;
'
.
+
>
!
!
,
-tI b
'
-
,-
.
i i
-
.
l l
t
'
-
l
!
,
la
'
. ~ ~
_..,.
--
.
.
-