IR 05000237/1985003
| ML17195A721 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Byron, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1985 |
| From: | Hawkins F, Sutphin R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17195A720 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-237-85-03, 50-237-85-3, 50-249-85-03, 50-249-85-3, 50-254-85-05, 50-254-85-5, 50-265-85-05, 50-265-85-5, 50-295-85-07, 50-295-85-7, 50-304-85-08, 50-304-85-8, 50-373-85-05, 50-373-85-5, 50-374-85-05, 50-374-85-5, 50-454-85-04, 50-454-85-4, NUDOCS 8503040312 | |
| Download: ML17195A721 (4) | |
Text
J
-*
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I I I Report No. 50-237/85-03; 50-249/85-03; 50-254/85-05; 50-265/85-05; 50-295/85-07; 50-304/85-08; 50-373/85-05; 50-374/85-05; 50-454/85-04(DRS)
Docket No. 50-237; 50-249; 50:-254; 50-265 50-295; 50-304 50-373; 50-374 50-454 Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name:
Dresden Power Station, Units 2 & 3 License N DPR-19; DPR-25 DPR-29; DPR-30 DPR-39; DPR-48 NPF-11; NPF-18 NPF-23 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2 Zion Power Station, Units 1 & 2 LaSalle County Power Station, Units 1 & 2 Byron, Unit 1 Inspection At:
Chicago, Illinois Inspection Conducted:
January 30, February 5-6, and 13, 198 Inspector:
N. Sutphi 1µ_,_,Q_
Approved By:
F. C. Hawkins, Chief Quality Assurance Programs Section J__/3.S/85 Date L-/Z~/ 85:"
Dafe I
Inspection Summary Inspection on January 30, February 5-6, and 13, 1985 (Report Nos. 50-237/85-03, 50-249/85-03, 50-254/85-05, 50-265/85-05, 50-295/85-07, 50-304/85-08, 50-373/85-05, 50-374/85-05, and 50-454/85-04(DRS))
Areas Inspected:
Routine announced inspection by one regional inspector of the offsite review and investigative functions and otfsite support staff. The inspection involved a total of 19 inspector-hours at the Commonwealth Edison Corporate Headquarter Results:
Of the three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie PDR ADOCK 05000237
J,o
- .
DETAILS Persons Contacted F. A. Palmer, Manager of Nuclear Safety W. M. Kiefer, Supervisor, Offsite Review and Investigative Function
- J. P. Leider, Supervisor, Safety Engineering T. S. Abel, Manager, Station Nuclear Engineering W. Shewski, Manager, Quality Assurance J. S. Bitel, Director of Quality Assurance, Operations D. A. Hamilton, Nuclear Fuel Inspector P. G. Holland, Staff Assistant, Nuclear Safety C. B. Zitek, Senior Participant, Dresden Station E. Budzichowski, Senior Participant, Quad Cities Station W. M. Benjamin, Senior Participant, Byron Station The inspector contacted other licensee personnel as a matter of routine during the inspectio *Denotes the person in attendance at the exit meeting held at the conclusion of the inspection on February 13, 198 Inspection of Quality Assurance Program The inspector reviewed the Quality Assurance Program to verify conformance with regulatory requirements, commitments, and industry guides and standards.
The following items were considered during this review:
QA program changes and the implementation of the QA program in the areas of offsite review and investigative function and offsite support staf Offsite Review and Investigative Function The inspector reviewed the offsite review and investigative functions to verify that they were conducted in accordance with Technical Specifi-cations and other regulatory requirement (1)
Documents Reviewed (a)
Dresden Technical Specification Section 6.0.G. (b)
Quad Cities Technical Specification Section 6.1.G. (c)
Zion Technical Specification Section 6.1.G. (d)
LaSalle Technical Specification Section 6. (e)
Byron Technical Specification Section 6. (f) Office of Nuclear Safety Organization and Administrative Manual, January 30, 198 (g)
Audits of Offsite Safety Review Committee:
TC No. 3-0FSR, Operating Experience Assessment Review (OPEX)-July 26-28, 1983 TC No. 4-0FSR, OPEX-July 14-15, 1981 TC No. 5-0FSR, OPEX-August 17-19, 1982 NE-84-802, July 17-19, 1984 (h)
Auditor Qualification Files (i) Q.P. No. 18-51, 11Audits for Operations - QA Program Audits
2
(j) Senior Participants - Qualifications Files (k)
Deviation Report (DVR) Packages (l) Modification Packages (m)
Proposed Technical Specification Change Packages (n)
Procedures/Tests and Experiments Packages with 10 CFR 50.59 Reviews (o)
Operating Experience Assessments (p)
Emergency Plans (q)
Licensee Event Reports (2)
Results of Inspection The inspector verified from the review of records and by interviews with Senior Participants for Offsite Reviews that the items specified in the Technical Specifications were being reviewed as require The licensee 1s Office of Nuclear Safety Organization and Administration Manual contains a provision which requires offsite review of reportable occurrences requiring 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> notice to the NRC. This requirement is consistent with the Dresden~ Quad Cities, Zion, and LaSalle Technical Specification Conversely, the Manual 1s provisions are*not consistent with the Byron Technical Specification; that is, the Byron Technical Specification requires that all reportable events be reviewed by the Offsite Review and Inve~tigative Functio The licensee advised that they normally perform an offsite review of all reportable events and will change their manual to recognize this as a requirement, thus meeting the Byron Technical Specifica-tion The inspector has no further questions regarding this matter at this tim No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie Offsite Support St~ff The inspector reviewed the licensee 1s offsite support staff program to ascertain whether this function was performed by qualified personnel in accordance with approved administrative control (1)
Documents Reviewed (a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Office of Nuclear Safety Organization and Administrative Manual, January 30, 198 Commonwealth Edison Corporate Quality Assurance Manua Audits of Offsite Safety Reviews and Operating Experience Assessment Reviews (OPEX).
Personnel Experience Qualification Forms for Engineering Personne Deviation Reports (DVR).
Station Nuclear Engineering Department Procedures.
Procurement Policies and Procedure QA Memoranda and Directive *
(2)
Results of Inspection The inspector verified that qualified personnel were used whenever offsite support was required for the operating plan This was in accordance with established procedures relative to modifications, design, construction, procurement, quality assurance, technical support, and safety review No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.
Exit Interview The inspector met with a licensee representative (denoted in the Persons Contacted Paragraph) at the corporate office on February 13, 198 The purpose, scope and findings of the inspection were summarize The inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the inspector during the inspectio The licensee did not identify any such documents or processes as proprietar