IR 05000220/1989029
| ML17056A372 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1989 |
| From: | Carrasco J, Strosnider J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17056A371 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-220-89-29-MM, NUDOCS 8910310008 | |
| Download: ML17056A372 (62) | |
Text
Meeting No.
M89-29 Docket No.
50-220 License No.
DPR-63 U. S
~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Licensee:
Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration 301 Plainfield Road S racuse New York 13212 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point Unit
Meeting At:
U.S. Nuclear Re ulator Commission
.Re ion I Kin of Prussia Penns lvania Meeting Conducted:
Se tember
1989 Prepared by:
arrasco, Reactor Engineer, MPS, EB, DRS
/o /3/gg date Approved by:
J trosnider; Chief, MPS, EB, DRS date t
A i
h R
i I
fthm September 28, 1989, to discuss Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's Nine Mile Point Unit 1 engineering program integration.
Significant issues discussed as part of this program included design basis reconstitution and configuration management.
The status of the structural integrity program for safety related, large bore piping also was discussed.
89103i0009 8/1037 P DR ADOCK 05000i~20
PNU
DETAILS Nine Mile Point Unit
En ineerin Pro ram Inte ration and Structural Inte rit of Safet Related Lar e Bore Pi in and Su orts On September 28, licensee representatives met with NRC management and staff at the NRC Region I office to provide an.update on ongoing activities in their engineeting program integration (EPI) initiative.
The status of the licensee's structural integrity program for safety related, large bore piping and pipe supports was included in the discussion.
A list of meeting attendees and a
copy of the licensee's presentation are attache'd.
r The licensee's engineering program integration effort is intended to integrate numerous engineering activities that are the result of regulatory requirements and industry and licensee initiatives.
The licensee has categorized these activities into four major groups:
(1) Design Basis Recovery and Configuration Management Upgrades; (2) Evaluation, Monitoring, and Maintenance of Plant Conditions; (3) Plant Reevaluations and Upgrades, and (4) Engineering Resources and Training Methodologies.
The licensee described their overall plans and schedules in these areas'he program for reconstituting the design basis will extend approx'.mately six years with systems being addressed based on safety priority and operational considerations.
The licensee indicated.that this effort will include a safety system functional inspection type approach.
As a result of a significant number of pipe support deficiencies identified during inservice inspections, the licensee initiated a program to reconstitute the design basis and configuration and to reevaluate the structural integrity of safety related, large bore pipe supports.
The'rogram included inspection of 1072 supports on 10 safety related piping systems in the ISI program.
Out of this population 6% rev'ealed structural concern's and all deficiencies were addressed through NCRs.
An additional 1916 non-ISI, safety-related large bore pipe. supports and small bore pipe supports were inspected and analyzed to demonstrate their compliance with the FSAR,structural commitmepts.
The results of this effort showed that all supports and systems inspected and analyzed satisfy FSAR allowables in their as-found condition, Conclusion The NRC stated that the licensee's program to integrate and coordinate engineer-ing activities appears to be a good initiative and encouraged continuing manage-ment support in this area.
With regard to large bore pipe, supports, the licensee concluded that all supports inspected satisfy FSAR commitments and that all identified deficiencies will be corrected prior to plant restar MEETING ATTENDEES Ni a ara Mohawk Power Cor oration NMPC C. Terry, Vice President Nuclear Engineering 5 Licensing R. Oleck, Manager of Engineering Program Integration (EPI)
P. Francisco, Licensing Engineer G. Gresock, Manager of Nuclear Engineering U.S. Nuclear Re ulator Commission W. Hodges, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (ORS)
M. Slosson, Technical Assistant (NRR)
R. Martin, Project Manager (NRR)
G. Meyer, Project Section Chief, 1B (DRP)
J. Strosnider, Section Chief, MPS,(DRS)
J.
Carrasco, Reactor Engineer, MPS (DRS)
R. Capra, Director, Project Directorate I-1 (NRR)
Conner 8 Wetterhahn M. Wetterhahn
V NlAGAPA ilMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MlLE POINT UNIT ENGINEERING PROGRAM INTEGRATION DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY/CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION TO NRC SEPTEMBER 28, 1989
hl V NlAeAAA H u MOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT
ENGINEERING PROGRAM INTEGRATION (EPI)
T hllASARA u MOHAWK INTRODUCTION TO EPI II.,
EPI APPROACH DESIGN BASIS RfCOVERY/CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS HISTORY OF DESIGN BASIS ACTIVITIES AT NMPC PROGRAM PLAN DESCRIPTION DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS IV.
SCHEDULE V.
VI.
STATUS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
~ NlASARA
<) MOHAWK
DEFINITION OF EPI ENGINEERING PROGRAM INTEGRATION o
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES INTEGRATION OF
"ISSUE"-TYPE PROGRAMS INTO THE ORGANIZATION RECONSTITUTION OF THE DESIGN BASES OF NINE MILE UPGRADE THE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENTSYSTEM FOR NINE MILE 1
+ T N1ASAQA 5% Ll MOHAWK I.
INT p
o EPI BEGINNlNGS -
LATE 1987 THRU 1988:
r f
o MANAGEMENT CONCERNED WITH OVERLAPPING EFFORTS, NEED TO IMPROVE COORDINATlON OF DESIGN BASIS EFFORTS o
RESULTS OF REVIEW CONFIRMED NEED FOR INTEGRATION, AND ADDITIONAL EFFORT ON DESIGN BASIS ACTIVITIES o
CONCEPTUAL PLAN DEVELOPED 'OR INTEGRATION, WITH EMPHASIS ON.
DESIGN BASIS
I.
INTRODUCTIONTO EPI (CONT'D)
ENGINEERING P ROGRAMS INCLUDED IN EP I 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
. 16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Material Condition Study Electrical System Documentation Seismic Upgrade Piogram Seismic Qualification of Equipment Individual Plant Evaluation
.
As-Builts-Electrical As-Builts-Mechanical As-Builts-Structural Vendor Manual Configuration Management FSAR Verification Erosion/Corrosion In-Service Inspection/ln-ServiceTest Materials Engineering Equipment Qualification Appendix R - Fire Protection Human Factors Problem Reports Root Cause Prob. Risk Assess (PRA)
System Assessment Engineering Excellence ln-Service Inspection/In-ServiceTest Plant Productivity 25.
Design Basis Reconstitution 26.
Q-List 27.
Engineering Procedures 28.
Computer Systems 29.
Advanced Methodology
N V NIAGARA u MOHAWK DEVELOPMENT PHILOSOPHY o
MAKE THE NMPC UNE ORGANIZATION PART OF THE TEAM o
EVALUATE RESULTS OF EXISTING PROGRAINS AND UPGRADE AS NECESSARY o
DIVIDE INTO MANAGEABLE SUBTASKS o
MAKE PRODUCTS OF DESIGN BASIS PROGRAMS
"USER FRIENDLY" o
PROCEED ONE STEP AT A
TIME:
TEST.
PLAN ON PROTOTYPE SYSTEMS o
MODIFY PLAN AS NEEDED AND IMPLEMENT FULL SCOPE o
INTEGRATE INTO EXISTING NMPC ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION AND MAKE PART OF THE WAY NMPC DOES WORK
ENGINEERING PROGRAM INTEGRATION N
V HlAGAPA ki MOHAWK STRATEGY EKlSIIHRJROQtbtS OEF. a c(Nm)OL of pLANT co+:Ic. a oasla Conf Igurat Ion Hanageaent Systea Vendor Hanual Prograa As-But Its - Electrical As-Bullts - Hechanlcal As-Bullts - Structural FSAR Veri f 1 cat Ion O-Ltst Upgrade Hatls. Eng'g. (Parts Data Base)
~AIIS Electrical Sys.
Docuaentatlon Selsalc Upgrade Prog (Oes Crlterla/Hodels)
Design Basis Reconstltutlon
> co% Ic. INWIT/c(NmN)L MoaAH Oocuaent/Equip.
IO 1 Ver If)cation
'ys/Equip.
Oocuaentat)on, HodlfIcation Data Base
'ocent Revlslon Control Iapleaentatlon In Design Process
> ON-GOING
> OESIQI BASIS RI)tISTITIITI(NI Sys/Equip Design Basis Oocuaents'es.
Crlterla Doc. (Structures, Plp)ng. Etc.)
Structures/Plplng Hodels C Data Base IN)t)IF (GATI (Nl PROCESS
> INTECRATE/CHS/DBR NITH ON-COING DESIGN ACTIVITIES AHD PLT.
SYSTEH CONF IG.
CONTROL PROCEDURES ONGOING PROCRAH NANAGEHENT Appendtr R
EVAL/HONITON INC/NAINT Of PL'T CXNR)/NEOIN)B Plt. Cond. Assess/Plt.
Life Ext.
In-Service Inspection Erosion/Corrosion Root Cause Problea Reports Plant Productlvlty Haterlals fnglneerlng (Eng'g.
Requests)
~LANT RE-EVALIIAT1(NIS a naADE5 Systea Assessaents Setsalc Upgrade Prog. (Sels.
Upgrade)
Selsalc Qua)If. Utllltles Crp.
(SQUG)
J
~LANT OOOI TIOI ASSESS. /INNIITMIINI Haterlal Condltlon Assess.
'alntenance Assessaent Capital laproveaent/Hod.
Assessaent
'lex prograa plan
~LANT awerr eNllrtelINI/Iamm WEEPING-GOING ON-GOING SUPPORT NEAR TERH SSFI ON-GOING ON-GOING SEISHIC UPGRADES PLT. CON). ASSESS/IN)N ITON ING ON-GOING PLT COND N)NI TOR INC, ASSESS..
5 RECORD KEEPING PLEX ACTIVITIES:
EVALS.
LICENSING STRATEGY CONFIGURATION CONTROL HAINT. I CAPITAL BUDGET CYCLE PLT RE-EVALS/INGIIAI)ES REGULATORY IPE/PRA
'EISHIC
'THER REG.
EVALS; (SSFI$,
ETC.)
'ESIGN BASIS UPCRADES Otl-GOING DEFER IE)IGINEERING RESOURCES L
Tralnlng Coaputer/Softvare Support Adv. Nethodo)
Developaent DEFER REVIE)t S REVISE ENGINEERING RESOURCES/TRAINIHG/TOOLS (ngtneei tng Fxcettence (;imPutei Systems Advanced ttethodotogy
'HA I n.t terri Inc)
P> oi rdo> vs Huaan Factors lndlvtdua I Plant fval.
( IPE) -----"--------~
ENGIHEERtHG RESOURCES
)RAIHIHC. HfTHODOLOCY DEVELOPHEHT. f I + H!AGAMA L4 IUHAM/K
.
o LONG-TERM, INTEGRATE PLANNED AND ON-GOING PROGRAMS UNDER FOUR MAJOR GROUPS:
DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY/CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT UPGRADE EVALUATION,MONITORING, MAINTENANCE OF PLANT CONDITION PLANT REEVALUATIONS AND UPGRADES ENGINEERING RESOURCES/TRAINING/
METHODOLOGIES
% NIAGARA, o MOHAWK'-
sVoe/ia
~
L
~
~ l
~
~
~
~ax ~~~
~ wee'~XCS t%XMae CN04PSl NIAOANA QONAWN FOWRh COhtOhAlÃN ENGINEKhlNO PhOOhAAA INtKOhAQO~
OROANIZAHOlWLINYRhFACRO FIOUhE 2-I
V NlAGAQA Li MOHAWK I II.
DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY/ CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
{EPI GROUP I) - PRESENTATION OUTLINE o
HISTORY OF DESIGN BASIS ACTIVITIES o
MOTIVATIONS FOR D.B.R o
PROGRAM PLAN DESCRIPTION PHASE I:
PHASE II:
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE III:
FULL SCALE IMPLEMENTATION o
PROGRAM APPROACH o
PROGRAM SCOPE SYSTEMS INCLUDED o
DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS SYSTEM-TOPICAL o
WORK TASK FUNCTIONAL PLAN
IVI T
N FOR DESIGN BASIS RECONSTITUTION/ CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT UPGRADE o
MORE EFFICIENT SAFETY EYALUATIONS CODE
- RECONCILIATION I
MOD.
DESIGN /ANALYSIS PROCESS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANT OPERATION o
TRAIN ENGINEERS e
PLANT LIFE EXTENSION
7 NtAGAPA k4 lNOHAWK (CONT'D.)
T RY F DE I
N BA I
A TIYITIE AT MP DEVELOPED IN-HOUSE SEP AND 'SAP
'THER INDUSTRY DESIGN BASIS/UPGRADE PROGRAMS (SQUG PILOT PLANT, * BWR MARK I,
APPENDIX R
PROGRAMS)
VOLUNTARILY INITIATED NMPC DESIGN BASIS IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES (ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROGRAM STARTED 1984)
~ DEVELOPED SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS
'REPARED ENGINEERING GUIDELINES PERFORMED AS-BUILT.CHECKS DEVELOPED SYSTEM LEVEL CONFIGURATIONMANAGEMENT SYSTEM
N 7 NlAGAPA Li MOHAWK (CONT'D.)
I T RY F DE I NB I
ATNMP NT'D.
EPRI/NMPC STRUCTURE/FOUNDATION INTERACTION RESEARCH PROJECT "SIMQUAKE III" EPRI REPORT.¹
-72 UPGRADED DESIGN BASIS FOR SEISMIC LOADS (SUP PROGRAM)
UPGRADED DESIGN BASIS AND CONFIGURATION CONTROL OF PIPING SUPPORTS
+ NlAGAPA si MOHAWK STRUCTURAL INTRGRIT%
N 7 NlAQAPA 0 MOHAWK III.
(CONT'D.)
NINE MILE POINT UNIT
1988
&
1989 P IPING
&
SUPPORT INVESTIGATIONS o
ISI, SAFETY-RELATED PIP ING SYSTEMS 1072 SUPPORTS SUPPORT INTEGRITY SYSTEM INTEGRITY ALL SUPPORTS/SYSTEMS MEET FSAR
o NON-ISI, SAFETY-RELATED LARGE-BORE SYSTEMS 1916 SUPPORTS SUPPORT/SYSTEM INTEGRITY ALL SUPPORTS/SYSTEMS MEET FSAR o
SMALL-BORE PIPING SYSTEMS REACTOR INSTR.,
LIQ.
&
DRAIN SUPPORT/SYSTEM INTEGRITY FSAR COMPLIANCE
N V NIAGARA is MOHAWK (CONT'D)
IVI P N
o INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE SURVEYED SCOPE, APPROACHES, LESSONS LEARNED o
EVALUATE PROGRAMS ALREADY UNDERWAY PURPOSE, SCOPE, STATUS, AND RESULTS o
IDENTIFY AREAS NEEDING INCREASED EFFORT DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT UPGRADE o
PARTICIPATE IN NUMARC EFFORT
{CONT'D.)
PHA E II:
TYPE IMPLEM A
o SELECT THREE SYSTEMS o
IMPLEMENT CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT UPGRADE
'o INITIATE DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY ACTIVITIES j',METHODOLOGY, WALKDOWNS, RECORDS RETRIEVAL, SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT)
o REVIEW DESIGN BASIS (SSFI TYPE APPROACH)
o MODIFY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
4
V NIAGARA L) MOHAWK T
P o
PROGRAM APPROACH COORDINATE ACTIVITIES OF ALL UNIT
NMPC, DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY AND CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES (I.E.,
INTEGRATE)
DEVELOP
"SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS" FOR EACH MAJOR SYSTEM OF THE PLANT DEVELOP
"TOPICAL DESIGN CRITERIA DOCUMENTS" FOR THE PLANT VERIFY THE AS-BUILT. CONFIGURATION OF THE PLANT RECOVER, EVALUATE AND RECONCILE DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS
arro a)sar)r la ~
~ -oo oa ol oar)orro T NIAGARA ss MOHAWK
~ ENGINEERING PROGRAMS I
COuPllT0)
I I
I I
I I
I s O~
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
s I
~rrrlar I
I I
I s
I I
I I
I I
I I
L.
~roars
~rers aal a~)
NEW I
I I
I I
I I *I I
I I
Il~l I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
L PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT IJH s ENwcc/saarl 0 sfcfso)
~osaaoD)o
~
aarorar oaro oor oo ~ soar rr geo roa raoO area
~
.I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I~I I
I I
I I
I I
oaaaoaao I ros sar)roars aol I
I I
L
I
~rorno I
J PROGRAM'MPLEMENTATION I
aoraraUI aol lars asar
~
I I
I I
I EHO PRODUCTS DEQCH I
I I
s
~
~
I I
I l~l I
I I
I I
I
~ ~ oa I
llA)IAGGIEHT I-I I
I I
I
~ace oasoa I
I I
aaaoo area oaaosa I
L J
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION ENGINEERING PROGRAM INTEGRATION FUNCTIONAL PLAN PART
DESIGN OASIS RECOVERY AHO COHFIQURATION MANAGEMEHT SYSTEM FIGURE 8-1
~ NlAt-A@A 0 MOHAWK III.
'RE VE Y N
PROGRAM PLAN DESCRIPTION (CONT.D)
DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS
CONTROLLING DOCUMENT FOR DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, MAINTENANCE, QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH SYSTEM AND IMPORTANT COMPONENTS IDENTIFY ENGINEERING RATIONAIE FOR REQUIREMENT IDENTIFY REFERENCE DOCUMENTS (e.g.,
THOSE IMPACTED BY MODIFICATIONS)
SERVE AS PRIMARY CONTROL AND KEY SOURCE OF DESIGN BASIS INFORMATION FOR MODS AND OTHER SYSTEM ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES PROVIDE CONTROLLED, AS-BUILT CONFIRMED, DESIGN BASIS INFORMATION FOR EACH SYSTEM WILL BECOME INTEGRAL PART OF CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CMS)
XZNS XZZsE POINT UNIT 1 STSTEX DESZQX BASIS DOCU)lEHT LIST Or SYSmmS N
V NIAGARA ilMOHAWK PRELIÃIMART-SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT 1.
Core Spray System 2.
Service Water Systems 3-.
125V 4 2iVDC Electrical Distribution Systems 4.
ADS System 5.
Control =Rod Drive f AT%S Systems 6.
Reactor Vessel Instrumentation System 8.
Motor Generator 'Sets
. S 120V AC Elec. Dist. Sys.
9.
Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling System 10.
Turbine Building Closed Loop Cooling Systems 11.
Emergency Cooling System 12.
Remote Shutdown System 13.
Containment Spray System 1i.
Containment Systems 15.
Reactor Recirculation System EPI PROGRAM YEAR ( 1)
~
'
~
~ ~
I II
~
~
~
C
~
I
~
e
~
~
~
II
~
~
~ 0
~ 0
~
0 0
~
~
~
~
~
o o
~
~
~
~
~
~
0 0
~
~\\
~ 0
~
e O
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
C
~
~
~
~
o
~
~
I
~
~ 0
Y NlASARA NINE MILE PClZNT UNIT 1 0 MOHAWK SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT LIST OF SYSTEMS PRELIMINARY SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT 31.
Reactor Pressure Vessel S Internals 32.
Spent Fu'el Pool Filtering f Cooling System 33.
Safety Parameter Display System 34.
Sampling and Post Accident Sampling Systems 35.
Circulating Mater System 36.
3 i5KV Electrical Distribution System EPZ PROGRAM YEAR (1)
NOTE:
1. Additional SDBDs may he written as resources permi N 7 NIAGARA iiINOHAWK DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY/PROGRAM PLAN DESCRIPTION-PRELIMINARY-TOPICAL DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS Ql~nt~ifl r 01.0 02.0 03.0 04.0 05.0 06.0 07.0'8.0 09.0 10.0 11.0 12.0.
13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 Site Characteristics.
Structural Loadings Design of Structures Reactor Design Requirements Engineering Safety System Design Instrumentatlon and Controls Electrical System Auxiliary Systems Steam and Power. Conversion System Radioactive Waste Management Material Design Requirements Installation Design Requirements Environmental Qualification of Instrumentation and Electrical Components Inservlce Inspection and Testing Human Factors Design Requirements Site Unit Services
N ~ NiASAPA iiMOHAWK R
R o
OVERALL 5 TO 6
-
YEAR EFFORT o
TOTAL EXPECTED FUNDING ASOUT
$50 MILLION
I
V.
o ENGINEERING PROGRAM INTEGRATION PLAN WITH S
YEAR FUNDING NEEDS DEFINED COMPLETE o
UTILITY EXPERIENCE SURVEY COMPLETE o
ENGINEERING PROGRAM INTEGRATION REVIEWS VENDOR MANUAL CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
-
=- MOD PROCESS:
OTHERS BEING DEVELOPED COMPLETE IN PROCESS IN PROCESS o
DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY PLAN DESIGN DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL USER NEEDS SURVEY SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS DESIGN
.CRITERIA DOCUMENTS COMPLETE o
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT UPGRADE PLAN INTEGRATED WALKDOWN COMPLETE PROTOTYPE
V NIAGARA u INOHAWK o
NMPC UNDERTAKING A SIGNIFICANT INITIATIVE TO RECOVER/RECONSTITUTE THE DESIGN BASIS OF NMP-1 o
PROGRAM BEING DEVELOPED AS A
DIVISION AND, PLANT-WIDE ACTIVITY BUILDING ON RESULTS OF PRIOR PROGRAMS o
SIGNIFICANT RESOURCES HAVE BEEN BUDGETED AND PLANS ARE IN PLACE o
NMPC WILL KEEP NRC APPR!SED OF DEVELOPMENTS AND PROGRESS o
SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT OBTAINED FROM INTEGRATION OF EFFORTS FROM EXISTING PROGRAMS