IA-85-213, Comments on BNL Re Proposed Review of Concerns Expressed by Ee Kent.Nrc May Expand on Insp Previously Performed at Plant But Should Not Duplicate Work Already Performed by Region V & NRR

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on BNL Re Proposed Review of Concerns Expressed by Ee Kent.Nrc May Expand on Insp Previously Performed at Plant But Should Not Duplicate Work Already Performed by Region V & NRR
ML20215L758
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 08/28/1984
From: Foster J
NRC
To: Harrison J
NRC
Shared Package
ML20215K202 List:
References
FOIA-85-213 NUDOCS 8706260165
Download: ML20215L758 (2)
v • d • e


Text

re equs t 28. 1084 MEHL- 'E.;M l-OP: J. H6rr2ioh.

F ROM: J. Forte'. Cory ) : enc e- Speciellst 5!.'!.0E.C1: E F X" HA'.'EN PEV] Eli OF E. E. IENT CONCERNS

, h4 . .

rr a c m c: 16 Er col t.even Net 2 onel L&boratcry 1 otter of Augm t 23. J oE : . r egercij ng thei r pr oposed review of the concernt e:p estc-d L: Mr . E.! nio E er 1 Lent.

  • As you - I.nc o. . these conc er r.s re] ate to welding practices at Sen Onoi e. Pt] : seds s , end N;diend. A comprehensive review was
p> &
oss3- p a r i ce n.e d by RV end NRR as to Mr . .. .llent's concernt-rt).tive tc Sen Onofre and generic disagreements.With the ASME and ALG w.r1 d i n g Coden (end other Standarde such ~ as ANSI q.':1i(icetion r c qui r ements . An inspection of specific welde et the I12 dl end pl ant wet conduct ed immediately after receipt-of the' Kent el l ec at i ons . An 01 A r evi ew of RV's handling of the Kent al] eget 2 ont has aleo been per f or med. It'is my understanding that

.DI:RIII sti3) hec an .unc ompl e ted case regarding Kent.

My' 9enerir comment on tho'broolhaven letter'is.that'the present

. e < i cm t h e..1 c' t e 1imited to concerns at Mid)end end Pe J i sades.. '

e n . the e) ) .rget i on iE oothaven t!24)specificel)y referred to R11I in t h e P'.' I + c 2 e l ] r.; pe ct s on Rer>or t Geport- Nos. 50-206/82-31.

t.. -- 3 : 1 C . - T 1.

. 57--36::/'6;-27 ) . Whi1e we may e.: pend 'on- the ihtpect2on pr e v2 c.ur ] y performed at Midi and in r esponte t c. . . Mr .

Kent's s pec 2 f 2 c weld concerns, we s,hould not duplicets wor 1.

elready. edequatel y perf ormed by RV and NRR. My specific comments are at follev:

1. A] ] eg e t i ons. 4: 16 t il l 7 rhould go to DI A orL be d2 tmi ssect.
2. ] c enne.i )ocitc al 1 ege t i on fl26 in the c ei. egor i : et i on .1~2 Et s.
3. Al1oget2ons #25 end tis 3 should be dismiesed.
4. AlIeget2ons $135, tt 38, tf 45 relate to Palisades and should not be closed out-of-hand.
5. rd l eg a t i on r #42 end itS8 are the como, .yet are categori:od di f f er e nt ] *, .
6. T h t. i nt er vi ew trenter2pt of the Augut,t 32, '1992 i ntei vi ev of

. !P . F.ent et hi l l we.s apparentl y. not revi ewed f or.' el l eget i ont .

James E. Foster Comp 1iance Specialist-r 8706260165 870619 FOIA E g PDR PDR

.O CARDE85-213 _q L .:

{

p' u,,. J j-e .4 a4

'9 r -': <,, :s..,, .-;.s,6, b *

(' S /s ' /7 , c 4 ..s'd st. A :x' 2:p 7 a /; 4 ',. f 4

.r,

?< ! L a .x d i -C 7 L-'sa...s/-i.s.A,a;,/c2l4.;w 4d.

  1. t/ 2 t L'S g ! ,,43 , c y p cljl/l....'( g, f , , ,7 . . /

sv.r.e.. J . m:.. A ol,n,vc.A ,x. . u..-/ 4./ . < > s F 2 s~ J A A O x ) , ( / .d. . slu NS3

  1. W ,eA>!/ x.,s, w <

/ue /qu nu;/r.:-r pyH M.

s.'N zs.gz - 2 7sf w/ra si bfL.n. /, c .. ',' #VA

,.E.l+ w k / 2 5 mi l &CW .4v.kfr-)E s.

As2 &^ " "

.2 6 .2 e c x.).

l 1

l 1

4 4

G-1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IA-85-213,_Comments_on_BNL_Re_Proposed_Review_of_Concerns_Expressed_by_Ee_Kent.Nrc_May_Expand_on_Insp_Previously_Performed_at_Plant_But_Should_Not_Duplicate_Work_Already_Performed_by_Region_V_%26_NRR&oldid=3253050"