HL-0477, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR21 Re Procurement of Commercial Grade Items by NPP Licensees

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR21 Re Procurement of Commercial Grade Items by NPP Licensees
ML20080G840
Person / Time
Site: Hatch, Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/1995
From: Mccoy C
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To: Hoyle J
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-59FR53372, FRN-60FR48369, RULE-PR-21 59FR53372-00018, 59FR53372-18, AF01-2-019, AF1-2-19, HL-04774, HL-4774, LCV-0556, LCV-556, NUDOCS 9502090140
Download: ML20080G840 (2)


Text

T - , ,

, GeorDia Power Company .- -

40 inverness Center Parkway DOCKETNUMBERg w

^,

Post Oftce Box 1295

\g C*o"n*'"#s'"#0*4!!' ' PROPOSEDRul.EJn M 00cKETED ggg@1CL) USNRC C. K. McCoy Pr dc t. Nuclear February 1, 1995

~hQfh bWCf

~

OFFICL mv Docket Nos. 50-321 0-424 DOCXE?n.a ONI774 50-366  :,?-425 @ E LCV-0556 John C. Hoyle, Acting Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Comments on Procurement of Commercial Grade Items by Nuclear Power Plant Licensees (59 Federal Register 53372 of October 24.1994)

Dear Sir:

Georgia Power Company has reviewed the proposed rule, " Procurement of Commercial Grade Items by Nuclear Power Plant Licensees," published in the Federal Register on October 24,1994. In accordance with the request for comments, Georgia Power Company is in total agreement with the NEI comments that are to be provided to the NRC. Additionally, Georgia Power would like to offer the following comment: The NRC j indicates that the new definitions of Basic Component, Commercial Grade Item, Critical Characteristic, Dedication and Dedicating Entity would apply only to Part 50 licensees while the current definitions of the Basic Component, Commercial Grade Item and Dedication would continue to be applicable to Part 30,40,60,61,71 and 72 licensees. Furthermore, the definitions of Critical Characteristics and Dedicating Entity woulJ not be applicable to licensees except those under Part 50. It will be confusing and costly for nuclear plant operators to procure and dedicate equipment under different regulatory ) requirements due to the fact that many Part 50 licensees have additional licenses. The  : current wording of the regulations indicate that a Part 50 licensee that holds additional l licenses would be working under differing definitions. The evaluation and reporting of I potential defects would also be more difficult. It is recommended that the new definitions be applicable and consistent to licensees who hold other licenses as well as a Part 50 license. ) Should you have any questions, please advise. Respectfully submitted, N C. K. McCoy CKM/JMG 9502090140 950201 PDR ADOCK 05000321 9 PDR ytD

. \ GeorgiaPbwerd U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 cc: Georgia Power Company Mr. J. T. Beckham, Jr., Vice President, Plant Hatch Mr. J. B. Beasley, General Manager - Plant Vogtle i Mr. H. L. Sumner, Jr., General Manager - Plant Hatch U. S. Nuclear Renulatory Commission. Washington. DC Mr. K. N. Jabbour, Licensing Project Manager - Hatch Mr. D. S. Hood, Licensing Project Manager - Vogtle U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Region II Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator l Mr. B. L. Holbrook, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch Mr. B. R. Bonser, Senior Resident Inspector - Vogtle l HL-4774 LCV-0556 File G.02.07

                                                                           .}}