AEP-NRC-2016-78, Unit 2 - Supplement to the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490, Revision 0, Deletion of E Bar Definition and Revision to Reactor Coolant System Specific Activity Technical Specification and ..

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Unit 2 - Supplement to the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490, Revision 0, Deletion of E Bar Definition and Revision to Reactor Coolant System Specific Activity Technical Specification and ..
ML16260A401
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 09/15/2016
From: Lies Q
American Electric Power, Indiana Michigan Power Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
AEP-NRC-2016-78
Download: ML16260A401 (7)


Text

m INDIANA Indiana Michigan Power MICHIGAN Cook Nuclear Plant POWER One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106 A unit ofAmerican Electric Power lndianaMichiganPm.yer.com September 15, 2016 AEP-NRC-2016-78 10 CFR 50.90 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and Unit 2 Supplement to the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490, Revision 0, "Deletion of E Bar Definition and Revision to Reactor Coolant System Specific Activity Technical Specification" and Implement Full-Scope Alternative Source Term

References:

1. Letter from J. P. Gebbie, Indiana Michigan Power Company (l&M), to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Document Control Desk, "Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490, Revision 0, "Deietion of E Bar Definition and Revision to Reactor Coolant System Specific Activity Technical Specification" and Implement Full-Scope Alternative Source Term, dated November 14, 2014, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession Number ML14324A209.

By Reference 1, Indiana Michigan Power Company (l&M), the licensee for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and Unit 2, requested a license amendment to adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF)-490 and implement full-scope alternative source term. As a result of discussion between l&M and U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff, it was determined that a supplement to Reference 1 was needed to clarify the definition of Dose Equivalent Xenon (Xe)-133, as described in TSTF-490.

This letter provides the supplemental information. Enclosure 1 to this letter provides an affirmation statement pertaining to the information contained herein. Enclosure 2 contains the revised mark-up for the Unit 1 Technical Specifications (TS) 1.1 definition of Dose Equivalent Xe-133 and contains the revised mark-up for the Unit 2 TS 1.1 definition of Dose Equivalent Xe-133.

The conclusions reached in the original determination that this License Amendment Request contains No Significant Hazards Considerations and the basis for the categorical exclusion from performing an Environmental Impact Statement have not changed as a result of this supplement.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP-NRC-2016-78 Page 2 There are no new regulatory commitments made in this letter. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Manager, at (269) 466-2649.

Sincerely, Q.t~lU Site Vice President

.TLC/mll

Enclosures:

1. Affirmation
2. Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Technical Specification Page Marked to Show Proposed Changes
3. Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Technical Specification Page Marked to Show Proposed Changes c: R. J. Ancona, MPSC A. W. Dietrich, NRG Washington DC MDEQ - RMD/RPS NRG Resident Inspector C. D. Pederson, NRG Region Ill A. J. Williamson - AEP Ft. Wayne, w/o enclosures

Enclosure 1 to AEP-NRC-2016-78 AFFIRMATION I, Q. Shane Lies, being duly sworn, state that I am Site Vice President of Indiana Michigan Power Company (l&M), that I am authorized to sign and file this request with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on behalf of l&M, and that the statements made and the matters set forth herein pertaining to l&M are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

Indiana Michigan Power Company Q.Z~). ~

Site Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS l51'\... DAY OF &plernber 2016

~.n~ NotaryPU ~

My Commission Expires 0\ / ~ l JC) or"?.

- . ... -~

Enclosure 2 to AEP-NRC-2016-78 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Technical Specification Page Marked to Show Proposed Changes

Definitions 1.1 1.1 Definitions DOSE EQUIVALENT XE-133 DOSE EQUIVALENT XE-133 shall be that concentration of Xe-133 (microcuries per gram) that alone would produce the same acute dose to the whole body as the combined activities of noble gas nuclides Kr-85m, Kr-85, Kr-87, Kr-88.

Xe-131m. Xe-133m, Xe-133, Xe-135m. Xe-135, and Xe-138 actually present. If a specific noble gas nuclide is not detected. it should be assumed to be present at the minimum detectable activity. The determination of DOSE EQUIVALENT XE-133 shall be performed using effective dose conversion factors for air submersion listed in Table 111.1 of EPA Federal Guidance Report No. 12, 1993, "External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air. Water. and Soil."

E AVERAGE E shall be the average ('.veighted in proportion to the DISINTEGRATION ENERGY concentration of each radionuclide in the reactor coolant at the time of sampling) of the sum of the average beta and gamma energies per disintegration (in MeV) for isotopes, other than iodines, 'Nith half lives > 15 minutes, making up at least 95% of the total noniodine activity in the coolant.

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 1.1-2 Amendment No. 2g+

Enclosure 3 to AEP-NRC-:2016-78 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Technical Specification Page Marked to Show Proposed Changes

Definitions 1.1 1.1 Definitions DOSE EQUIVALENT XE-133 DOSE EQUIVALENT XE-133 shall be that concentration of Xe-133 (microcurfes per-gram) that alone would produce the same acute dose to the whole body as the combined activities of noble gas nuclides Kr-85m, Kr-85, Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-131m. Xe-133m. Xe-133, Xe-135m. Xe-135, and Xe-138 actually present. If a specific noble gas nuclide is not detected. it should be assumed to be present at the minimum detectable activity. The determination of DOSE

. EQUIVALENT XE-133 shall be performed using effective dose conversion factors for air submersion listed in Table 111.1 of EPA FederalGuidanceReport No. 12, 1993, "External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air. Water. and Soil."

E AVERAGE E shall be the average pNeighted in proportion to the DISINTEGRATION ENERGY concentration_ of each radionuclide in the reactor coolant at the time of sampling) of the sum of the average beta and gamma energies per disintegration (in MeV) for isotopes, other than iodines, with half lives > 15 minutes, making up at least 95% of the total noniodine activity in the coolant.

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 1.1-2 Amendment No. 209