Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Resolution of Insp Issues from Insp Rept 50-309/84-11.Items Closed,Pending Region I ConfirmationML20133G298 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Maine Yankee |
---|
Issue date: |
07/31/1985 |
---|
From: |
NRC |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20133G286 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 8508080628 |
Download: ML20133G298 (4) |
|
Similar Documents at Maine Yankee |
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20196K4821999-07-0606 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Because of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Status of Myaps Facility,Confirmatory Orders No Longer Necessary for Safe Operation or Maint of Plant ML20206H1611999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 164 to License DPR-36 ML20206G5731999-05-0303 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License DPR-36 ML20205D5261999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program for Maine Yankee.Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program Consistent with Current Licensing Practice for Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning ML20204C4631999-03-16016 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 162 to License DPR-36 ML20197C8231998-09-0303 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & (C) & App E to 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning ML20236U8451998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Operational QA Program ML20217H5241998-03-30030 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 161 to License DPR-36 ML20202D3181997-11-26026 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-36 ML20216F1511997-08-0808 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-36 ML20141G6511997-05-19019 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-36 ML20138G3541997-05-0202 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-36 ML20058E2641993-11-0505 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 143 to License DPR-36 ML20056F7831993-08-23023 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 142 to License DPR-36 ML20127D5061993-01-11011 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 136 to License DPR-36 ML20126H6211992-12-29029 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 135 to License DPR-36 ML20059K9991990-09-20020 September 1990 SER Accepting Methodology Re Statistical Combination of Uncertainties for RPS Setpoints ML20059H5901990-09-12012 September 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Facility Response to Station Blackout Rule.Issue of Conformance to Station Blackout Rule Will Remain Open at Facility Until Identified Nonconformances Resolved ML20059D0501990-08-30030 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 117 to License DPR-36 ML20055C2911990-02-20020 February 1990 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Assessment of Asymmetric LOCA Loads Problem ML20246F6281989-07-10010 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 113 to License DPR-36 ML20245J0571989-04-25025 April 1989 SER Re Accepting Facility Emergency Response Capability in Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97,Rev 3,w/exception of Instrumentation Re Variables Accumulator Tank Level & Pressure & Containment Sump Water Temp ML20245D4481989-04-24024 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 111 to License DPR-36 ML20245D4351989-04-24024 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 112 to License DPR-36 ML20155B4631988-09-27027 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 107 to License DPR-36 ML20154A1411988-09-0707 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 106 to License DPR-36 ML20150D7681988-07-0707 July 1988 Safety Evaluation Approving Util Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation Sys Contingent on Completion of Emergency Procedures & Operator Training & Submittal of Applicable Tech Specs ML20153A9641988-06-28028 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Proposed Reflood Steam Cooling Model ML20196G6871988-06-23023 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 105 to License DPR-36 ML20151W5861988-04-26026 April 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 104 to License DPR-36 ML20153B3381988-03-16016 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831110,840216,0412,1214, 850618 & 0820 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2.2, Based on Stated Util Commitments,Insp Rept 50-309/86-07 & Actions Described in Procedure for Vendor Interface ML20149H2831988-02-17017 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 103 to License DPR-36 ML20196C4301988-02-0909 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 102 to License DPR-36 ML20235M4661987-09-29029 September 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 101 to License DPR-36 ML20236F6441987-07-29029 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Response to Item 2.1 of Generic Ltr 83-28 ML20234B1781987-06-25025 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 100 to License DPR-36 ML20216J0371987-06-25025 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 99 to License DPR-36 ML20215E9301987-06-15015 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 98 to License DPR-36 ML20214W3841987-06-0404 June 1987 SER Supporting Util 831110 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 2.2 (Part 1) Re Requirement for Program Description to Ensure All Components of safety-related Sys Identified as safety-related on Informational Matls ML20214M1491987-05-21021 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 2) Re Established Interface W/Nsss or Vendors of Each Component of Reactor Trip Sys ML20214J6001987-05-20020 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 97 to License DPR-36 ML20210C6631987-04-23023 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Adequacy of Offsite Power Sys.Further Evaluation Cannot Continue Until All Requested Info Received.Surowiec Line Not Acceptable Substitute for Mason Line During Startup or Normal Operations ML20206U9231987-04-0909 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 96 to License DPR-36 ML20197D4421987-04-0707 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting 850807 Request for Relief from ASME Code,Section XI Inservice Testing Requirements for Pump & Valves ML20197D4241987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 94 to License DPR-36 ML20205M6391987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Accepting Upgraded Seismic Design Program Contingent on Licensee Commitment to Upgrade Items in Table 3 ML20212N7091987-03-0404 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 93 to License DPR-36 ML20211G4361987-02-14014 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831110 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2 Re on-line Testing for Reactor Trip Sys Reliability ML20210V1831987-02-0909 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 92 to License DPR-36 ML20207N2181987-01-12012 January 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Response to NRC 860721 Request for Addl Info Re Reactor Coolant Pump Shaft Integrity,Per IE Info Notice 86-019 1999-07-06
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20211M4841999-08-31031 August 1999 Replacement Pages 2-48,2-49 & 2-50 to Rev 14 of Defueled Sar ML20211D7111999-08-0909 August 1999 Rev 17 to Maine Yankee Defueled Safety Analysis Rept (Dsar) ML20196K4821999-07-0606 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Because of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Status of Myaps Facility,Confirmatory Orders No Longer Necessary for Safe Operation or Maint of Plant ML20206H1611999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 164 to License DPR-36 ML20206G5731999-05-0303 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License DPR-36 ML20205D5261999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Util Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program for Maine Yankee.Rev 1 to CFH Training & Retraining Program Consistent with Current Licensing Practice for Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning ML20204C4631999-03-16016 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 162 to License DPR-36 ML20206D7491998-12-31031 December 1998 Co Annual Financial Rept for 1998. with ML20155G9591998-11-0303 November 1998 Rev 1 to Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20155D8651998-10-28028 October 1998 Public Version of, Maine Yankee Emergency Preparedness Exercise ML20197C8231998-09-0303 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q),10CFR50.47(b) & (C) & App E to 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning ML18066A2771998-08-13013 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Deficiency in CE Current Screening Methodology for Determining Limiting Fuel Assembly for Detailed PWR thermal-hydraulic Sa.Evaluations Were Performed for Affected Plants to Determine Effect of Deficiency ML20236X1751998-08-0303 August 1998 Rev 16 to Defueled Sar ML20236U8451998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co Operational QA Program ML20248D3011998-05-26026 May 1998 Rev 14,page 16 of 17,Section II of QA Program ML20247J0211998-05-11011 May 1998 Revised Page 16 of 17 of Section II of QA Program,Rev 14 ML20247D3451998-05-0606 May 1998 Rev 15 to Defueled SAR, Replacing List of Effective Pages ML20217J9811998-04-28028 April 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Incorrect Description of Drift Specification for Model 1154,gauge Pressure Transmitters,Range Code 0 in Manual Man 4514,Dec 1992.Cause Indeterminate.Will Issue & Include Errata Sheets in All Future Shipments to Users ML20217H5241998-03-30030 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 161 to License DPR-36 ML20217D9691998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Maine Yankee.W/ ML20216D7681998-02-25025 February 1998 Rept to Duke Engineering & Services,Inc,On Allegations of Willfulness Related to Us NRC 971219 Demand for Info ML20203A3011998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Maine Yankee ML20202F3771998-01-31031 January 1998 Annual Rept of Facility Changes & Relief & Safety Valve Failures & Challenges ML20202E0541998-01-30030 January 1998 Rev 14 to Myaps Defueled Safety Analysis Rept ML20199K3211998-01-27027 January 1998 Rev 13 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co,Qa Program ML20199K3471998-01-22022 January 1998 Rev 14 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co QA Program ML20199C2281997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217R2301997-12-31031 December 1997 Myap Annual Financial Rept for 1997 ML20203F8551997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20202D3181997-11-26026 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-36 ML20198R6371997-11-0606 November 1997 Yankee Mutual Assistance Agreement ML20155G9511997-10-31031 October 1997 Rev 1 to M01-1258-002, Decommissioning Cost Analysis for Myaps ML20198P9431997-10-31031 October 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217K5191997-10-24024 October 1997 Part 21 Rept Re Five Valves That May Have Defect Related to Possible Crack within Forging Wall at Die Flash Line.Caused by Less than Optimal Forging Temperatures.Newer Temperature Monitoring Devices at Forging Area Heating Ovens Procured ML20211N0571997-10-0707 October 1997 Revised Pages to Jul/Aug 1994 SG Insp Summary Rept ML20198K0201997-09-30030 September 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20199H1861997-09-25025 September 1997 Rev 12 to Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co,Qa Program ML20217A9251997-08-31031 August 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20217R1051997-08-27027 August 1997 Myaps Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20216F1511997-08-0808 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-36 ML20210M4451997-07-31031 July 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1997 for Myaps ML20151M1351997-07-21021 July 1997 Rev 0 to Technical Evaluation 172-97, Cable Separation Safety Assessment Rept ML20141H2691997-06-30030 June 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20141B9951997-05-31031 May 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1997 for Maine Yankee.W/ ML20141G6511997-05-19019 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-36 ML20138G3541997-05-0202 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-36 ML20141G2871997-04-30030 April 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1997 for Maine Yankee ML20137Z1971997-04-14014 April 1997 Forwards to Commission Results of Staff Evaluation of Performance of Licensees W/Ownership Structure Similar to Plant ML20137N7541997-03-31031 March 1997 Rev 11 to Operational Quality Assurance Program ML20138B1491997-03-31031 March 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1997 for Maine Yankee 1999-08-09
[Table view] |
Text
_
,
.
..
9 .
- .
Enclosure Resolution of Inspection Issues
-
-
Maine Yank ~ee Power Plant Docket No. 50-309
.
Introduction Between October 22-26, 1984, we assisted Region I in conducting an Appendix R inspection at Maine Yankee. On January 17, 1985, Inspection Report No.'50-309/
84-11 was issued pertaining to that inspection. The following items were
,
left unresolved by the Region pending NRR evaluation of proposed fire protection ir,cdificatiens and/or additional information supplied by the licensee:
Item (84-15-03), Unsealed openings in fire barriers Item (84-15-06), Structural Improvements to fire doors Item (84-11-04), Non-fire-rated seismic gap Item (84-11-07), Oil Collection System for Reactor Coolant Pump "
By letters dated' March 20 and May 15, 1985, the licensee submitted additional infonnation.
,
'
2.0 Item (84-15-03) Unsealed Piping and Ventilation Duct Openings in Walls Identified in the SER and Fire Hazard Survey as Fire Rated We observed that certain walls and ceiling / roofs, which form the perimeter of several fire areas in the plant, contain unsealed pipe penetrations'and
-
unprotected ventilation duct / louver openings. The locations of these features are delineated in a letter from the licensee dated October 11, 1984.. We were concerned that a fire within one are'a would propagate through the openings and damage redundant / alternate shutdown-related equipment on the other sid However, we previously evaluated certain penetrations in the Service Building and Turbine Building and found them acceptable, as detailed in our Safety Evaluation of November'30, 1984. In the remaining areas, the breached boundary construction is separating the areas from the exterior of the plant. The walls and/or roof do not separate shutdown-related equipment inside the plant from redundant / alternate components outsid In addition,'there is no accumulation j ___ _ . __
_
.. . . .-- .
8508080628 B50731 PDR ADOCK 05000309 G PDR
_ _ _ _ ._ ____ _ .. _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ._
.--
,
- .-
e l
.
-2- '
of combustibles or fire hazards outside the plant that would represent a threat to the systems in these locations. Therefore, the unprotected openings have no safety significanc Where unprotected penetrations exist in walls or ceilings between two interior fire areas,.these barriers do not separate redundant shutdown. systems ei.the The areas on either side of the perimeter construction are provided with fire detectors and automatic and manual fire fighting equipment as delineated in the
,
licensee's~ Fire Hazard Analysis. 'The areas also have a limited fire load, with combustible material dispersed throughout. If a fire were to occur, we expect it to be discovered in'-its formative stages before significant flame spread or temperature rise occurred. The fire would then be suppressed by the plant fire brigade using manual fire fighting equipment. Because the perimeter, ,
construction contains unprotected openings, we expect a certain amount of '
smoke and hot gases to filter into adjoining areas. But tnese products of ,
combustion would be so cooled and dissipated as to pose no significant threat
-
i to safety systems in adjoining areas or represent a serious potential for causing
- .second ary fires involving combustible materials in adjoining location Therefore, these penetrat' ions have no safety significanc We, therefore, recomend that this item be considered closed.
i .
'
\
Item (84-15-06) Structural Improvements to Dcors 3401 and 3402 and Installation of a Sprinkler System Accepted as Equal to 3-Hour Rated Door l We observed that doors Nos. 3401 and 3402, Primary Auxiliary Building to Fuel Handling Building, were altered to allow a crane monorail to pass through the doors. At the inspection, we concluded that, because of the limited fire hazards, the existing fire protection and the absence of shutdown-related equipment on either side, the modifications made to
door 3402 were acceptable. However, the existing configuration of door 3401 was unacceptable. The licensee verbally committed to install a partial automatic sprinkler system above the monorail on the truck bay side of this l
,_ _ door 2 We considered this itent unresolved pending the licensee's implementation-of this comitment. By letter dated March 20,1985, the licensee confinned
, _ _ _ _ _-
. _ . ,
_ _ _ _ _ . ._ _ _. '.'
. .
.
-3-that the installation of the sprinkler system at door 3401 was complet Therefore, this item should be considered close .
Item (84-11-04) Non-Fire Rated Seismic Gap Around the Containment We observed that the fire area boundary walls and floor / ceiling assemblies of Fire Areas G, H, I, J and K are formed, in part, by a " shake space" (seismic gap) at the containment boundary interface. This shake space is filled with a non-fire rated sealant and capped on both sides with an angle iron bolted into the wall or floor / ceiling. We were concerned that because the configura-tion was not fire rated, fire would propagate through the shake space and damage redundant shutdown-related systems on either side. At the inspection, we agreed with the licensee that in areas protected by an automatic fire suppression system or where the seismic gap was located in exterior walls and did not separate redundant / alternate shutdown equipment, this concern was adequately
-
mitigate In those locations where the above considerations were not appli-cable, the licensee verbally connitted to either install an automatic fire suppression system or to replace the non-fire-rated sealant with a fire-rated penetration seal. We considered this item unresolved pending faiplementation '
of the licensee's connitments. By letter dated March 20, 1985, the licensee confirmed that the non-fire-rated sealant in the seismic gaps was replaced with a " fire proof" niaterial fiaving a 3-hour fire rating. Therefore, this item should be considered close Item (84-11-07) Oil Collection System for the Reactor Coolant Pumps ,
We observed that an oil collection system had not been installed at the RCPs per the technical requirements of Section III.J of Appendix R to 10 CFR 50. This item was deferred pending our review of an exemption request submitted by the licensee. In our safety evaluation of November 3,1984, we recommended that this exemption request be denied. By letter dated May 15, 1985, the licensee committed to install an oil collection system for each reactor coolant pump and provided design details of the system. We-have evaluated this design and
_ _ _ _ concl_ude that it meets the requirements of Section.II.J of. Appendix R. and therefore, this item should be considered close _ _
. .
~
. .
.
. .
.
,
'
.
'
- 4-Conclusion -
,
Based on the above evaluation, we conclude that the following inspection -
.
items should be considered closed, pending Region I confirmation that modifications have been satisfactorily completed: '
Item (84-15-03), Unsealed openings in fire barriers Item (84-15-06), Structural Improvements to fire doors Item (84-11-04), Non-fire-rated sei:mic gap '
Item (84-11-07),011 Collection System for Reactor Coolant Pumps
-
'
Principal Contributer:
D. J. Kubicki, DE
_
Date: July 31, 1985 .
)
i l
.
l
, - . . . . .. .
,
'
. _ - . . . _ _ . _ _ . . _ __ _. _~ _
. . . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .-