ML17249A717

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:54, 29 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises of Authorization to Use Previously Furnished Affidavits for Current Reload Review Re Cycle 10. Same Proprietary Matl Being Used
ML17249A717
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1980
From: WIESEMANN R A
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To: ZIEMANN D L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17249A716 List:
References
NS-RAW-005, NS-RAW-5, NUDOCS 8002250527
Download: ML17249A717 (12)


Text

Ntestinghouse ElectricCorporation YYaterReactorDivisions iix&rTechnology OivisionBox355PitlsburghPennsylvania 15230February5,1980NS-RAW-005 Mr.DennisZiemann,ChiefOperating ReactorBranchS2DivisionofOperating ReactorsOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, 0.C.20555

SUBJECT:

DocketNo.50-244,R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlantREF:Rochester GasandElectricCompanyApplication forWithholding, WhitetoZiemann,February1980

DearHr.Ziemann:

Theproprietary materialforwhichwithholding isbeingrequested byRochester GasandElectricCompany(RGE)isofthesametechnical typeasthatproprietary materialpreviously submitted inconnection withanNRC.Staffreloadreview.Thepreviousapplication forwithholding, AH-76-31, wasaccompanied byanon-proprietary affidavit signedbytheowneroftheproprietary information, Westinghouse

'Electric Corporation.

Thesubject.proprietary materialisbeingsubmitted insupportofthereloadreviewmsociated withRGE'sR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant,Cycle10.OnMarch2,1977,Westinghouse submitted aproprietary affidavit tosupple-mentthenon-proprietary affidavit accompanying application forwithholding AW-76-31.

Becausethereloadreviewmaterialassociated withCycle10isofthesametechnical typeasthatassociated withWCAP-9272, theproprietary affidavit submitted tosupplement thepreviousjustification isequallyapplicable tothismaterial.

Accordingly, thisletterauthorizes theutilization ofthepreviously fur-nishedaffidavits insupportofthereloadreviewassociated withRGE'.sR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant,Cycle10.

~P;Mr.D.Ziemann0PwFebruary5,1980NS-RAW-005 Correspondence withrespecttotheproprietary aspectsoftheapp1ica-tionforwithho1ding ortheWestinghouse affidavits shou1dreference CAW-80-08, andshouldbeaddressed totheundersigned.Very'tru1y yours,~>&6M.a.KJ RobertA.Hiesemann, ManagerRegulatory ELegislative Affairs/bek.cc:J.A.Cooke,Esq.(NRC)L.D.White(RGE)

Attachment BResponsetoQuestion6onMixedOxideFuel(Proprietary)

~.

~g41WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS26.ThestaffSERonMixedOxideFuelstatesthatuseofU02densification modelsforHOXshouldbeverified.(l)

Sinceitappearsthatthisassumption wasusedfortheVOXfuelforGinna,pleaseverifythisassumption.

Doesthepredicted amountofdensification satisfyReg.Guide1.126.ThecurrentWestinghouse U02fueldensification modelwasusedtopredictthedensification performance ofthetIOxfuelsfabricated forGinna.Thisempirical model,whichwasderivedusingonlyU02performance data,usesfuelsintering temperature andsintereddensitytopredicttheextentofdensification.-

Theapplication ofthemodeltolIOfuelisjustified onXtwobases;thesimilarity inprocedure usedinfabrication ofNOfueltoXUO>procedures andtheabilitytoconservatively predicttheperformance ofpreviously irradiated t~i0fuels.XWhile,studyingthedensification ofpureU02,therelativedimensional

,stability offuelwasfoundtobestronglydependent onthepelletizing

.processemployedandthevaluesofkeyprocessing parameters.

Theprocesses usedinpelletfabrication forGinnaareessentially identical v(iththoseused.inpreparing MOfuelpreviously irradiated byWestinghouse whoseXperformance isconservatively predicted bytheU02model.Further,thepelletizing processes usedforpreparing theGinnaIl0fuelisverysimilarXtothatusedbyWestinghouse toproduceU02fuel.Thelimitingprocessing

parameters, sintering temperature andfinalpelletdensity,werecontrolled toarangewhichproducesU02fuelwithpredicted performance withindesignrequirements.

TheWestinghouse experience withIIOdensification performance duringirradiation hasbeenreportedandcomparedwithmodelpredictions inWCAP-8349-P.

Theoretically, MOdensification wouldbeexpectedtoXproceedatalowerratethaninUOsinceporeremovalisdirectlyrelatedtolocalfissionevents.Densification orporeremovalisabu1kprocessandinU02fuelthefissioneventsarefairlyuniformly distributed inthematerialandtheproductdensifies uniformly.

.However,inMOthefissioneventsareconcentrated inorveryneartoPu02particles whicharefreetodensifyindependently oftheU02matrix.Thelowenrichment U02matrixexperiences alowerfrequency oTfissioneventsthannormalenrichedU02fuelatsimilarburnupandshouldshowaloweramountofdensification.

TheWestinghouse urSTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS2'2experience withdensification ofMOfueloperatedinacorrmercial powerXreactoriscomparedwithpredicted valuesinFigure1whichistaken'fromMCAP-8349-P.

TheFigurealsocontainsdatafortheperformance ofaVO2fuelwithsimilarfabrication characteristics fordirectcomparison.

Figure1containsdataforbothmechanically mixedand"mastermixed" fuel.Mastermixed fuelispreparedbyco-precipitating V02and'Pu02thenmixingtheCo-precipitated materialwithU02.TheU02modelisabestestimatemodelandhencethereshouldbe'asmanypointswithdensification underpredicted asoverpredicted.

Thisisobviously notthecaseforeithertheU02orMOfuelwiththedensification' beinggenerally overpredicted.

Significantly, theprediction ofthemodelwasnoticeably moreconservative fortheMOfuelthanfortheU02withXsimilarprocessing history.AsshowninFigure1,theprediction formastermixedMOwaslessconservative thanfor'mchanically mixedMO.ThisisasXX~expectedandfurtherillustrates thelowerdensification expectedfromfuel'withinhomogenously distributed fissionevents.Theperformance ofanMOfuelofhigherPu02contentwhichwasoperatedinXtheSaxtontestreactorwasalsoreportedinMCAP-8349-P

.'hisfuel,which.operated athighertemperatures thancommercial powerreactors,'as alsofoundtodensifylessthanpredicted bythemodel.Thepredictive capability oftheU02modelwasfurthertestedbyevaluating theperformance oftheMOfuelintheEPRIMO.densification program.'heseXXfuelswerepreparedbyawidevariation inprocessing variables andhencerepresent arangeofconditions greaterthanwaspresentindataonwhichthemodelwasbased.Theperformance oftheEPRIfuelsasreportedinEPRIHP-637arecomparedwithmodelpredictions inFigure2.ThedatainFigure2indicatethemodelisessentially conservative forallfuelsshown,eventhoseunstablefuelspreparedbyprocedures dissimilar tothoseforfuelonwhoseperformance themodelisbased.Forthestablefuels,thosewhichdensified

<2volumepercent,themodelishighlyconservative inthatitgreatlyoverpredicts thedensification.

TheGinnaMOfuelisprojected tobehavestably;allcurrently manufactured Westinghouse U02fuelsarealsoprojected toshow'stablebehavior.

)YESTlNG'HOUSE PRPPRIU~QYgQSSPsReg.Guide1.126doesnotindicateamaximumamountofdensification allowable but,ratherdefinestheamountofdensification thatmustbeassumedbasedona'thermalresintering test.Designmustaccountfortheamountofdensification assumedfromtheresintertest.Thermalresinterdataisnotavailable fortheGinnat10fuelsoanalternate Xmethodmustbechosentopredictthedensification performance; the'ethodusedwastheWestinghouse U02model.Theaccuracyofthismodelcanbecomparedtothepredictions fromthethermalresintermodelinReg.Guide1.126.Thebasisforestablishing therelativeabilities ofthetwomodelstopredictperformance wasestablished byuseoftheEPRIdata.The.predicted performance usingthethermalresintering modeliscomparedwithactualperformance inFigure3.Examination ofdatainFigure3indicates theresintermodelsignificantly overpredicts theamountofdensification, especially inthe.regionofstablefuels(<2-v6lumepercentdensification) wheretheoverprediction isasmuchas2.5percent.Comparison ofFigures2'Cand3indicates therelativepredictive abilities

'ofthetwomodels.Thecomparison showsthetwomodelsareverysimilar,bothmodelsbeinggenerally conservative.

Thedegreeofconservatism isfoundtobegreaterintheregionofstablefuels.Similarnumbersofdatapointsareslightlyunder-predicted bythetwomodels,however,theWestinghouse modelisbothmoreconsistent andmoreconservative inthelessthan2percentdensification

'angewhichisrepresentative oftheGinnaHOfuel.XThedatapresented demonstrate thattheWestinghouse U02fuel,densification modelyieldspredictions similarto'ndmorereliablyconservative forNOXfuelthantheresintermodelinReg.Guide1.126.'

STIIIGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASSII8198-I9).b,c)~E'1.0OIC3LEGEHO'HIXEOU02-3j,PuO~HASTERAIXEO UO2<<3$Pu02QUO>.0.00.0,0.5'.0MEASUREDSTACKLEHGTHDECREASE, nL/LOR1/3Ap/p(PRESENT)

Figure1.Comparison oFDensification DataforUO-3%PuOwithUOBothFabricated underSimilarConditions toaDensityofApproximately 91%T.D.

)VESTIWGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CI.aSS2Figure2.Westinghouse U02ModelPrediction ofDensification ofEPRIMOFuelsXQzz0>>Qi>QlgQ.Q>>Qp,QQ<<oEU10Qiz@<aO~'gQIIpgrsQ<<~i;Q3<<7(DllQaQ<<QvQMOMechanically MixedSMOMasterMixedQU02DataNumbersindicateEPRI'fueltypes.023ActualChangeinDensity,5

WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CUSS2Figure3.Reg.GuidePrediction ofEPRIMODataXl9)9QIQfwGQcJ32.CLOl~l3Of8~gggg0>~OI~gyOl8'bs\l7(7(ptgIXlkQ0IkOMOMechanically MixedXIMOxMastert1ixedeU02DataNumbersindicateEPRIfueltypes.~1"02'ActualChangeinDensity