ML17317B246
| ML17317B246 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1979 |
| From: | LEVIN C SENATE |
| To: | HENDRIE J M NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17317B245 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906070290 | |
| Download: ML17317B246 (108) | |
Text
CARLLEVINt$fCHIOAN)Rl.'nHeb Wf~feeWenrdeWASHINGTON, D.C.20510May9,1979Mr.JosephM.HendrieNuclearRegulatory Corrnission Washington, D.C.20555
DearMr.Hendrie:
Iwanttoencourage theNuclearRegulatoxy Comnission toholdapublichearingonIndianaandMichiganPowerCo~y'sapplication toincreasenuclearwastestoragecapacityatitsCookplantinwesternMichigan.
OurnationisinaperiodinwhichmanypeoplehavelostfaithintheirgovexnIrent's resolvetodotherightthing,particularly regarding nuclearpower.Andweshoulddoanyt1~gwecantohelprestorepublicconfidence ingovernment andgivepeopletheopportunity tovoicetheiropinions.
Becausepersonswithobjections totheCookplansinadvertently werenotnotifiedbytheNRC,theydidnothavetheopportunity tocallfor.ahearingatanearlierstage.Iamtold,however,thatpersonswithspecificobjections canaskforapublichearingwithin45daysaftertheplansarereviewedandapprovedbytheNRC.Ithinkyoushouldextendtheopportunity thatwasmissedearlierandmakeevexyefforttohearandconsiderallsidesinthisdecision.
Nooneshouldbeabletofairlysaythattheregulatory processwasashaminthiscase.Asyoumayknur,Ihavecalledforaoratorium onnuclearpowerplantconstruction notalreadyunderway.
Iamconcerned aboutnuclearpowerplantaccidents, lmr-level radiation andwaste.Ihaveseriousdoubtaboutourlong-term abilitytodealwiththedangerous wastegenerated bythenuclearpowerplants.ButIhavenotca1ledforashutdownofoperating nuclearpower-plants orplantsunderconstruction, andIrealizewehavetostorethewastebeinggenerated bytheseplants.Iunderstand theneedtoexpandwastefacilities.
Theonlyalternative wouldseemtobetransportation ofthewastetoanotherstoragesite,andthatwouldbedangerous foranumberofreasons.Itdoesseemtomethatrequestsformarestoragespaceoonfixmmydoubtsaboutthenuclearpcmerplantindustxy's abilitytosolvethewasteproblem.Consumers Power,forexample,isaskingformrewastestoragespaceforitsMidland,Michigan, pcwerplantthatisstillunderconstruction.
Mydoubtsaside,IthinktheCooksituation callsforanextraeffort,bythegovernment toberesponsive toitscitizens.
Sincerely, Ogp~CarlLevinU.S.Senator IP4Qo~f IC'ARLLEVINMICNIOAN~JPnifebWfnfee&enableWASHINGTON.
D.C.205I0May9,1979Mr.JosephM.HendrieNI.uclearRegulatory Comission Washington, D.C.20555C9qcP~+V0ggoepo"0.
DearMr.Hendrie:
Iwanttoencourage theNuclearRegulatory Coamissian toholdapublichearingonIndianaandMichiganPoorerCoIopany's application toincreasenuclearwastestoragecapacityatitsCookplantinwesternMichigan.
Ournationisinaperiodinwhichmanypeoplehavelostfaithintheirgovernment's resolvetodotherightthing,p-Irticularly regarding nuclearpower.Andweshoulddoanytt~gwecantohelprestorepublicconfidence ingovernment andgivepeopletheopportunity tovoicetheiropinions.
Becausepersonswithobjections totheCookplansinadvertently werenotnotifiedbytheNRC,theydidnothavetheopportIzu.ty tocallforahearingatanearlierstage.Iamtold,however,thatpersonswith.specificobjections canMkforapublichearingwithin45daysaftertheplansarereviewedandapprovedbytheNRC.Ithinkyoushouldextendtheopportunity thatwasmissedearlierandmakeeveryefforttohearandconsiderallsidesinthisdecision.
Nooneshouldbeabletofairlysaythattheregulatory processwasashaminthiscase+Asyoumayknow,.IhavecalledforaIInratorium onnuclearpcarer'lantconstruction notalreadyunderway.
Iamconcerned aboutnuclearpcs~plantaccidents, lmr-level radiation andwaste.Ihaveseriousdoubtaboutourlong-term abilitytodealwiththedangerous wastegenerated bythenuclearpowerplants.ButIhavenotcalledforashutdownof'perating nuclearpowerplantsorplantsunderconstruction, andI~zewehavetostorethewastebeinggenerated bytheseplants.Iunderstand theneedtoexpandwastefacilities.
Theonlyalternative wouldseemtobetransportation ofthewastetoanotherstoragesite,andthatwouldbedangerous foranumLmrofreasons.Itdoesseemtoaethatrequestsformrestoragespaceconfirmnpdoubtsaboutthenuclearpowerplantindustry's abilitytosolvethewasteproblem..
Consumers Pmer~forexample,isaskingfora+rewastestoragespaceforitsMidland,Michigan, powerplantthatisstillunderconstruction.
Mydoubtsaside,IthinktheCooksituation callsforanextraeffort,bythegovernment toberesponsive toitscitizens.
Sincerely, CarlLevinU.S.Senator OCT041S78TheHonorable RobertP.GriffinUnitedStatesSenateWashington, D.C.20510
DearSenatorGriffin:
Asrequested byyourreferralofSeptember 15,1978,enclosedisacopyofalettertoMr.JamesC.HcGaheyresponding tohisletterofSeptember 8.1978toDr.CliffordY.Smith,DirectoroftheOfficeofNuclearMaterialSafetyandSafeguards att(RC.Sincerely, (signed)iVilliamS.DirclNDctIV!,l.xccutivc Director(o011"rn!inns
Enclosure:
AsstatedDISTRIBUTION EDO-04555 EDOR/FMMalschRFonnerDSSS.-OCA~OELDOELDR/FSECY-781353 CentralFile(3)OPPIC2WSVRNAMSWOATS'gRr:ph....t..a.3.s.ch---.
9/28/78ELH.KSjlpp.C,r..........,
gg.F/78EDOJLYGossick 0/V/78IQ/g/78NRCFORM318(9-76)NRCM0240AV;SoOOVSRNMSNT PRINTINOOPPICS<ISTSS2S024
~~~f'Q1)~]'"yOcr)p)g'(j,f"r)ffc)l OCT3)978th'.JamesC.McGahey,President UnitedPlantGuardMorkersofAmerica25510KellyRoadRoseville, Michigan48066
Dearter.HcGahey:
InyourletterofSeptember 8,1978toDr.CliffordV.Smith,DirectoroftheOfficeofNuclearMaterialSafetyandSafeguards, youraisedseveralquestions abouttheemployment ofsec'urity guardsattheDonaldC.CooknuclearpowerplantinBridgman, tlichigan.
Ofparticular concerntoyouisthefactthattheutilityisobtaining anewsecurityforcecontractor bybidding.YousuggestNRCcanthroughsomeapplica-tionof"federalpolicynpreventthechange.Iknowthisanswerwilldisappoint you,butthetruthisthatasageneralmatterNRChasnoauthoritytointervene inthehiringpractices ofautilityforguards.NRChasrecently.
throughrulemaking, estab-lishedsomeguardqualification,
- training, andequipment requirements buttheserequirements maybemetbyeitherproprietary orcontractguardforce.(Thenet]regulation waspublished intheFederalRegisteronAugust23,1978andwillbeeffective onOctober23,1978-acopyisenclosed).
Accordingly, NRCisinnopositiontoinstitute "remedial action"asrequested inyourletter.Mewouldbehappytodiscussthissubjectwithyoufurther,ifyouthinkthiswouldbeuseful.Mecertainly wouldbeconcerned if,f'rexample,itappearedthataswitchfromaproprietary toacontractguardforcedid,contrarytoourexpectations, impactsignificantly ontheeffec-tivenessoftheguardforce.Sincerely, (StgncIi) qVnttamJ.birchgcputyi,Tccutiv
~cDjTccto'c fpTOpcTationa
Enclosure:
FederalRegisterNoticeSeepreviousyellowforconcurrences orrIcs~DISTRIBUTIONM.MalschR.FormerOELDOELDR/FG.McCorkleSURNAMEWOATS'O/+/7S EDO~--E4O-RIf F-CentralFilNRCFOR1If31S(9-76)NRCM02404UoS,OOVSRNMSNT PRINTINOOrrICSIIDTdd244d2d
~~IhJl~itt'hFI~WI'JlhI~aIII)8hIh~I-~~~'JI4I,IJ~I1~kI1IIJ~IhCv'4~JtII~I,'"IIg'~'CPJ~III.ht1~=h~I'tI~I~IIII~~41i'lIFFIF'I'IJJ4t~hh Mr.James'C.McGahey,President UnitedPlantGuardllorkersofAmerica25510KellyRoadRoseville, Michigan48066
DearMr.McGahey:
InyouletterofSeptember 8,1978tDr.CliffordV.Smith,DirectoroftheOfficeofNuclearMaterialSafeandSafeguards, youraisedseveralquestions abouttheemploentofsecurityguardsattheDonaldC.Cook'nuclearpowerplainBridgman, Michigan.
Ofparticular concerntoyouisthefactthatheutilityisobtaining anewsecurityforcecontractor bybidding.usuggestNRCcanthroughsomeapplica-tionof"federalpolicy"prevtthechange.Iknowthisanswerwilldisppointyou,-butthetruthisthatNRChasnoauthority tointervene nthehiringpractices ofautilityforguards.NRChasrecently.
througrulemaking, established someguardqualification,
- training, andequipment equirements buttheserequirements maybemetbyeitherproprietary contractguardforce.(Thenewregulation waspublished intheFede1RegisteronAugust23,1978andwillbeeffective onOctober23,1978acopyisenclosed).,
Ourattorneys adviseme,however,thatwhileIRCmayundertheAtomicEnergyActof1954,asamended.prescribe guardqualification,
- training, andequipment forthephysicalproctionofalicensedfacility.
theActgivesNRCnoauthority inthareaofutility-unionrelationships.
Accordingly, NRCisinnopsitiontoinstitute "remedial action"asrequested inyourletter.Sincerely yours,EnosureDISTRIBUTION M.MalschR.FormerOELDOELDReadingC.SmithG.McCorkleLgQOrEICE~SIIIINAMEW IIATE~ELD~IPIII-------Form6:h9/78EDONRCPOR1If318(9-76)NRCM02406UeSoOOVEIINMENT PRIN?INOOSEICEII074424424
<<Vltl,l<<rh.4ll~~I.r<<I4C'It4CtF~4IFhI~lI4.rI','Ur"l'I4l<<lrr.444\I4l444'hItiI~~4h4III44~<<,cr'Iht'I44P44hrtfn<<'4fFV4r44.r'4,llI'l4t4~,4*44<<l.f4'n4ll",cII'"~"$4I44HIS<<IC t4:14+jt~iI~%tfULATIONSRULESANDREG3V421Iitself.ThesamereasoabaronsuchfiUngswsionalsosupportaprfiUngswiththesubortorybodiesintheCCommission hasdecidregulations accordingl EFFECTIVE DATE:AFORFURTHERICONTACT:StephenS.Ostrach,theGeneralCounsRegulatory Commton,D.C.20555.202-SUPPLEMENTARY IBecausethisamendmattersoffnternalgeneralnoticeof.propfsunnecessary.
PursuanttosecttoAtomicEnergyActof2201andto5U.S.C.U.S.C.553,thenextto10CFR9.103lsamendthatsupportththeCommis-ltbtttonagainstinateadjudica-mmission.
Thedtoamendits)gust23,1978.FORMATION Esq..Officeof,U.S.Nuclearion,Washing-34-3224.FORMATION:
entrelatestoencypractice, sedrulemakfng 161ofthe1954,42U.S.C.552b(g)and5lastsentenceofdtoread:$9.103iGeneralprovisiouchstatemepleaded,cited,orreUtheCommtssfon orinunderpart2oftheseCFRpart2)exceptasmaydirect.DatedatWashing17thdayofAugust19rFortheCommfssion.
SAbrSccrctar71 ofth(FRoc.'18-23588 FiledS.tsmaynotbeduponbeforeanyproceeding regulations (10heCommission n,D.C.,thts81.J.CHIu(,Commission. 78:8:45am]'P50-01jPART35-HUMAIIYPRODUCT MUSESOFTERIALApplication FormPLicense-MdrMaterials icalarRegulatory endingitsreg-ofanewformonsforMatcri-Thenewformntheoneitre-asfs,hasresult-dencebotwcentsregarding de-catfons.November6,"ulatoryCommis.ulctothcComp.ccvicwasrllaybceralReportsAct,512.Thedrltconcordkecpfng) re.lccomcseffective, AGENCY:U.S.Nuc)Commission (NRC).ACTION:Finalrule.SUMMARY:NRCfsulatfonstorequireusNRC-313M, "AppUcatalsLfccnse-Medical"fseasiertoffftoutthplaces,and,onatrialedfnreducedcorrespNRCandtheapplicficfcncfes intheirapplEFFECTIVE DATE:1978.NoTr.-Thc Nuc)csrRsionhassubmitted thistrollerGeneralforsuchappropriate undertheFasamended,44V.S.C.whichthereporting (qulrcmcnt otthisruleunless'hdviscd tothecoreflectsinclusion ofthc4thatstatuteallowsforVD.C.3512(cX2)).
FORFURTHERtrary.accordingly
~dayperiodwhichsuchreview(44FORMATION CONTACT:EdwardPodolak,ardsDevelopment, ulatoryCommissio D.C.20555,phone30SUPPLEMENTARY IficeofStand-S.NuclearReg-Washington,
-443-5946.
0RMATION:
forthemedicalialarefiledonPresently, applicatio useofbyproduct matthegeneralappUcatfo withtheaidofaguide(NUREG-0338, questsinformation nspecifictothemedFormAEC-313doesspaceanddoesnotspmuchofthefnformatthemedicalUcensinformNRC-313Mhasspecifically forthetion.FormNRC-3changethesubstanti thatmustbcmetbmedicallicenses.
Thequiredonthenewfothatcurrently identffcalUcensingguide.thenewformNRC-31themedicallicensing forthelicenseetousbasis,hasresultedindencebetweenNRCcantsregarding defiapplications.
FormNRC-313ManformAEC-313edicalUcensingev.1)whichre-essaryforandalappUcation.
othaveenough(tiffealtyaddressonrequested inguide.Anewbeendeveloped edicalappUca-3Mdoesnot0requirements applicants forinformation re-isthesameasedInthemedi-wever,because)MfstaUoredtouide,itiseasierand,onatriallesscorrespon-andtheappU-enciesfntheirthemedicalU-fablefromthegBranch,Divi-andMaterialclearMaterial,U.S.Nuclearn,Washington, censingguideareavRadfotsotopes LfcensirsionofFuelCycleSafety,OfQceofNLISafetyandSafeguard Regulatory CommtssfD.C.20555.'ecause thisnoticetersofagencymanagdure,generalnoticeomakingandpublicprareunnecessary andcanbeeffective 75darelatestomatentandproce-proposedrufe-cedurethereonheamendment safterpublica-tfon.PursuanttotheAof1954,asamended,t1gamfzatton Actof19)tIcEnergyActeEnergyRcor-4,asamended53oftitle5ofe,thefoUowfng10,ChapterI,iations,Part35mentsubjecttoandsections552andtheUnitedStatesCoamendmcnts toTitleCodeofFederalRearepublished asadocreadsasfollows:g33.4Application forrlccnscs.AppUcations forspehumanuscunderH35.13shallbefiled313M,"AppUcatton fcense-Medical."
forspecificli-ificlicensesfor5.11,35.12,andnformNRC-rMaterials Li-codification.
Anewsectionf35.Isaddedwhich(Secs.81.161b,Pub.L.868Stat.035,948(42U.S.201,Pub.L93-438,as.1242(42U.S.C.5841).)DatedatBethesda, ofAugust1978.FortheNuclearRmission.=LzgExecu[oc.78-23340Filed703.asamended..2111,2201);sec.ncnded.88Stat.d.,this8thdaygulatoryCom-Gosslct(,
iveDirectorrOperations.-22-78:8:45am)590-01]ART73-PHYSICALPROTECTION OFPLANTSAND'ATERIALS SecurityPersonnel Qualification TrainingandEquipmont Requirements AGENCY:U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission.
ACTION:Finalrule.SUMMARY:OnJuly5,1977,theCommission published forpubliccom-mentproposedamendments totheCommission's regulations toimposeupgradedguardquattffcatton,
- training, andequipping requirements forsccuri-typersonnel protecting againsttheftofspecialnuclearmaterials andindus-trialsabotageofnuclearfaciUties ornuclearshipments InresponsetopubUccomments, thetrainingandquaUficatlons sectionofthcproposedamendments hasbeenextensively revisedtospecifyperform-anceorientedrequirements insteadofthedetailedtrainingrequirements asoriginally proposedonJuly5,1977.Theperformance orientedrequire-mentsgivelicensees flexlbiUty fnse-lectinganddeveloping thcmostcost-effective trainingprogramstomeetsitespecificneeds.TheNuclearRegu-latoryCommission nowfspublishing theserevisedamendments infinalform.Concurrent withpublication oftheseamendments, theNRCisissuingforpubUccommentguidancedocuments toassistthelicenseeinthedevelop-mentofsecuritypersonnel trainingandquaUffcations plansrequiredbytheamendments.
Theeffective dateoftherevisedrequirements hasbeensettopermitpubUccommentontheguid-anceanditsissuanceinfinalformatthetimetherequirements becomeef-fective..
EFFECTIVE DATE:October23;1978.'Rom.-The NuclearRggu)atory'ommis-sionhassubmitted thisruletotheComp.(rogerGeneralforreviewofitsreporting rcquircmcnts undertheFcdcraiReportsAct.asamended.44U.S.C.3512.Thedateonwhichthcreporting requfrcmcrlt oftherulebccomcsc(fcctivc.
untcssadvisedIothecontrary.
includesa45*dayperiodwhichFEDERALREGISTER, VOL43,t(O.154-WKDt(ESDAY, AUGUST23,)978e
~~/3V422thatstatuteallov:storComptro)lcr Generalreview<44U.S.C.3512(c)(2)).
FORFURTHERINFORMATION CONTACT:Mr.R.J.Jones,ChiefMaterials Pro-tectionStandards Branch,DivisionofSiting,HealthandSafeguards Standards, OfficeofStandards De-velopment, U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.20555,301-443-5907.
SUPPLZMENTARY INFORMATION:
In1975;thesecurityagencystudy(NUREG-0015, ES)concluded thai,"Creation ofaFederalguardforceformaintaining securftyinthenuclearin-dustrywouldnotresultinahigherdegreeofguardforceeffectiveness thancanbeachievedbytheuseofpri-vateguardsproperlyqualified, trainedandcertified (bytheNRC)."In19V6.aJointERDA-NRCtaskforcewasformedtoproposeaplanofactionforimproving thecontrolsandprotection ofnuclearIflaterfafs atNRClfcensedfuelcyclefacilftfes.
Thetaskforcead.dressedthecurrentstatusandfuturedirection ofphysicalsecurityprotec-tionatNRClicensedfuelcyclefacilf-tfesnowfnpossession ofcertainquan-'titiesofspecialnuclearmaterials.
ThetaskforcereportissuedinJuly1976includedconclusions andrccommenda-tlonswhichprovideabasisforrule-.making.TheNuclearRegulatory Com-missionhasdetermined, asaresultofthesecurityagencystudyconclusions, thcJointtaskforcefindingsandothersubsequent dellberatlons, thatsecuritypersonnel qualification andtrainingrequfrements shouldbeupgradedthroughpublicrulemaking.
OnJuly5,1977,theNuclearRegulatory Commis-*sionpublished intheFRDLslaLRsors-xRR(42FR34321)proposedamend-mentsto10CFRpartV3ofitsregula-tions.Interested'persons wereinvitedtosubmitwrittencommentsandsug-gestionsontheproposedamendments within45daysafterpublication fntheFEDERALRFAISTFR.
Thecommentperiodwassubsequently extended30days.Basedonthepubliccommentsandotherconsiderations, theCommis-sionhasadoptedtheproposedamend-ments,withmodifications assetforthbelow.'Inadoptingtheseamendments theCommfssion decidedthatthercqulre-mcntsshouldnotbemade.effective untilgufdancchadbeen'published toassistthe)fcensccs Indeveloping theirsecuritypersonnel trainingandquail.fications plans.Concurrent withthepublication oftheseamendments,
'hreeguidancedocuments arebeingpublished forpubliccomment.Theseare:1.NUREG-0464
~"SILeSccurltyPcr.sonnclTrainingManual,"IIULBSANI)REGULATiONS
't2.NUREG-0465, "Transportation SecurityPersonnel TrainingManual,"arid3.Regulatory Gufde5.52,"Standard FormatandContentforthePhysicalProtectfon SectionofaIfcenseAppli-cation<ForFacilities OtherThanNu-clearPowerPlants),"
RevisedChapter4."Security Organization,"
andChap-ter18,"Security Personnel."
Copiesofthesethreeguidancedocu-mentsarebeingsenttopersonswhohaveexpressed aninterestInthismatter.Commentsarebeingrequested bySeptember 22,1978sothatfinalguidancecanbepublished bythetimetherulcbecomeseffective October23,19V8.Afourthdocumentspecificfornu-dearpowerplants,"NuclearSecurityPersonelforPowerPlants,NUREG-0219,Draft2,"waspublished forcom-mentfnApril1978.Thisdocumenthasbeenrevisedandpublished infinalform.Copiesofthesedoucmcnts alsowillbeplacedintheCommission's PublicDocumentRoomat,1717HStreetNW.,Washfngton, D.C.Singlecopiesofthesefourguidancedocu-mentsmaybeobtainedbywritingtotheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commis-sion.Attention:
Bernadine Scharf.Dis-tribution ServicesBranch,Washing-ton.D.C.20555.Significant dffferenccs fromthepro-posedrulepublished forcomment;onJuly5,19VVare:(1)titlesanddeffnf-tionsusedfnappendixBhavebeenclarfffed andmovedto10CFRV3;2tobeconsolidated withotherdefinitions applicable to10CFRpart73;(2)em-ploymentsuitablity criteriahavebeenrevisedLobelessrestrictive onthehiringofunarmedsecuritypersonnel, andmorespecificonthehiringofarmedsecuritypersonnel; (3)physicalqualification criteriahavebeenrevisedtorequirephysicalexaminations forcentralalarmstationoperators and-armedsecuritypersonnel; (4)thecrite-riaforvisionandhearingcapability havebeenrevisedforclarification pur-poses,andtopermittheuseofhear-ingaidstoqualiftytothehearingcri-.teria;(5)mentalqualffications criteriahavebeenrevisedtodeletethere-quirement forpsychological testingofunarmedsecuritypersonnel, except,forcentralalarmstationoperators, andtoallowforsomeflexfbflfty inthelicenseepsychological evaluation pro-gram;(6)physicalfitnessqualificat-.
ionsscriteriahavebeenrevisedtopermiteachIfcenscetodevelopphysi-calfitnessrequirements tomeetsitespecificneeds;(7)contractsecuritypersonnel criterion hasbeenrevisedtobejobrelated;(8)trainingandqualifi-cationscrfte@ahavebeencompletely revisedtodeletespecified trainingcoursesandInsteadrewritten tore-quirethelicenseetodevelopaplanthathewilluscLDmeettheproposed0fEDERALREGISTER, VOL43,NO.164-WEDNESDAY, AUGUcriteria, inordertoassurethat,securi-typersonnel possesstherequiredskill,knowledge andabilitytoperformas-signedsecurityJobduties;(9)thccri-teriawhichspecifycertainrequire-mentsforsecuritymanagement.
andsecuritysupervisors havebeendeleted;(10)thecriteriaforweaponstraining)lavebeenrevisedandthenumberoftraininghourshasbeendeleted;(11)weaponsqualification criteriahavebeensimplified andclarified; (12)thephrases"otlimitedto",and"sappropriate
"havebeendeleted;(13)theperiodoftime'llottedforsubmittal ofalicenseeplantoimplement theseproposedre.quirements hasbeenlengthened from30to120daysforfuelcyclefacilities andtranportation and300daysfor:powerreactors; and(14)fuelcyclefa-~cilityandtransportation licensees planswouldbefollowedby180daysaftertheeffective dateoftheruleor60daysafterNRCapprovaloftheplan,whichever fs)ater,andpowerre-actorlicensees planswouldbefollowed, by500daysaftertheeffective dateoftheruleor60daysaftertheapprovaloftheplan,whichever fslater.Thefollowing discussion pertainstoItems(1)through(14)above.(1)Titlesanddef(nitions.
Com-,mentersstatedthattitlesanddefini-tionscontained fnappendixBshouldbeIlmitedandclarified andsuggested
.thatalldcfinilfons appHcable to10CFRpart73andappendixBshouldbelocatedin10CFR73.2.InresponsetothesecommentstheCommission hasdecidedtolimit,thenumberoftitlesused,toclarifysuchtitles.andtoremovetitlesanddefinf.tionsfromappendixB.Accordingly, titlesanddefinitions offobdutfes,es.sentfaltotheeffective operation ofalicenseesecuritysystem,havebeenclarified, theterm"armedescort"hasbeenaddedanddefined,andtitlesanddefinitions havebeenincludedin10CFR73.2.(2)SuitabQity critcri<L Somecom-mentersrccommendeg that,criteriaforsuitability andphysicalqualifica-tionbedeleted.Somecommenters statedthatinviewofthefactthatLheageofma]orityforvoting.Joiningthearmedservicesandenteringintolegaltransactions is18years,aminimumageof21years'for hiringsecurityper-sonnelwouldpresentlegalproblelns ifchallenged underequalemployment, laws.Othercommenters statedthatthecriteriaforahighschooldiploma.orequiva)ent andthe~prohibition agafnstfelonyconvictions shouldbeclarified toavoidanycomplications thatmightarisebecauseofemploy-mentopportunity laws.Inresponsetothesecomme)Its LheCommission hasdecided:<a)Lopermitlicensees toemployunarmedsecuritvpersonnel under21yearsofage;(b)toST23,1978 relaborate onthemeaningofhighschoolequivalent:
and(c)tobemoreexplicitregarding typesoffelonycon-victionstobcconsidered.
Therulehasbeenchangedtrrclarifythemeaning.ofhighschoolequivalent, fntermsofJobconnection, andinrequiring nofelonyconvictions toshowadirectre-latfonship betweenafelonyconviction andthespecificJobassignment beingsought.However,theCommission be-lievesthatbecauseofthehighlevelofresponsibility assocfated withtheJobdutiesofarmedpersonnel, suitability crfteriaarenecessary.
Accordfngfy, theminimumagerequirement of21yearshasbeenretainedforarmedsecuritypersonnel.
(3)Physfcalqualificatfons crfterfa.
Somecommenters statedthattheri-gidityofphysicalqualifications wouldseverelylimitthenumberofcandi-datesavailable tofillsecurityjobfunctions andthatthe.criteriaspeci-fiedwouldresultinaviolation ofFed-eralageandsexdiscrimination laws.InresponsetothesecommentstheCommission hasdecidedtodeletethecriteriarequiring aphysicalexamina-tionforunarmedsecuritypersonnel exceptforcentralalarmstationopera-torsandinsteadwillrequiresuchper-sonneltobephysically capableofper-formfngassignedsecurityjobduties.Thecriteriaspecifying therequire-mentforphysicalexaminations havebeenrevisedtoapplyonlytoarmedse-curitypersonnel andcentralalarmsta-tionoperators.
(4)Visforrandhearfngcrfterfa.
Commenters madethefollowing state-mentsabouttheproposedvisionandhearingcriteria; (a)theyareoverlyre-strictive; (b)unarmedsecurityperson-nelshouldnotberequiredtomeetthecriteria; (c)therequirement forrecog-nizingbasiccolorsshouldbeclarified; (d)theuseofahearingaidshouldbeallowedtocorrecthearingimpairm-entt;(e)thatadditional clarification oftheserequirements Isessential; and(f)thatftwouldbepreferable to.speci-fyminimumrequirements Intermsofthebetterear.InresponsetothesecommentstheCommfsslon hasdecidedthat:(a)un.armedsecuritypersonnel shouldbeexemptfromvisionandhearingre-quirements unlessrequiredbyas-signedsecurityrelatedtaskidentified In.thelicensee's plan;(b)thecriterianeedtobcclarified; and(c)ahearingaidtocorrecthearingimpairment shouldbcpermitted..Accordingly, thecriteriawhichspecifyvisionandhear-ingrequirements havebeenrevisedto:(a)Applyexplfcitiy toarmedperson-nel;(b)clarifythercquirernents; and(c)permit,theuseofahearingaidtomeet.hearingrequirements.
(6)Mentalqualifications criteri.Somecommenters statedthatthere-qulremcnt foreachsecurityforceRULESANDREGULATIONS membertobcexaminedbyalicensedclinicalpsychologist orpsychiatrist isunnecessary andoverlyrestrictive.
andthatadequatepsychological screening iswithinthecapabilities ofagcncralphysfcian whohasexperience Insuchmatters.Othercommenters statedthatanoptiontothementalcxamlna-tionshouldbcavailable, andsuggestthatIndividuals employedbythesamefirmformorethan2yearswithnosignofemotional instability shouldbeexcusedfromtakingthcmentalexam-ination.InresponsetothesecommentstheCommission hasdetermined that:(a)psychological evaluations shouldbeadministered byalicensedpsycholo-gist,orpsychiatrist, orphysician orotherpersonprofessionally trainedtoidentifyemotional instability; (b)per-sonsotherthanarmedpersonnel andcentralalarmstationoperators neednotundergopsychological evaluation; and(c)thegrantingogexemptions orexceptions toNRCrequirements, properlysupported anddocume'nted, willcontinuetobealicensing respon-sibility.
Accordingly, mentalqualifica-tionscriteriahavebeenrevisedtore-quireonlyarmedpersonnel andcen.tralstationoperators toundergopsy-chological examination, andtopermitsubsequent identification ofpossibleemotional instability fortheseandallothersecuritypersonelbynormalsu-pervisory personnel, subjecttoveriff-cationbyan'ppropriately lfcensedandtrainedperson.(6)ContractsecuritypersonneL Commenters statedthatrequirements forcontractsecuritypersonnel shouldbe'obdutyrelated.InresponsetothesecommentstheCommission agrccdthatcontractsecu-ritypersonnel shouldberequiredtomeetthesamecriteriaforspecificse-curityjobtasksanddutiesthatwouldberequiredforalicenseeproprietary guardfor'ce.Accordingly, contractse-curitypersonnel criteriahavebeenre-visedtobeJobrelated,Justasforin-housesccurltypersonnel.
(7)Trafnfngandqualfficatfons.
Somecommenters statedthatthepro-posedtrainingandqualifications crite-riaattempttobetoobroadandallIn-clusiveinscopewhilesacrificing qual-ity,indeptheducatfon andtraining.
Mostcommenters statedthattheover-allconceptofspecifying infinedetaileachcourseofinstruction, thenumberofhoursofinstruction foreachcourse,theindividuals whowouldberequiredtoattendeachcourse,thedo.cumenting ofnamesofinstructors andplacesofinstruction foreachcourse,specifictrainingrequirements forli-censeemanagement andsecurity'su-pervisory personnel, etc.,wouldnotneccessarily achievethedesiredobJcc-tiveofuniformly upgrading thequal-It,vofsecuritypersonnel atlicensedfa-37423cilitiesandintransportation becausetraininginitselfwouldnotmeasureanindividual's capability toperformas-signedsecurityjobduties.Inaddition, commenters statedthatthereap-pearedtobemuchduplication amongtheproposedtrainingprograms, andthattrainingprogramsandfacilities wouldmoreproperlybedesignedandfmplemented onasitespecificbasis.InresponsetothesecommentstheCommission hasdecidedthat,becauseofsitespecificrequirements astheyrelatetosecurityhardware, physicalbarriers, materialaccessandvitalareas,alarmsystems,andprocedures requiredtoimplement alicensee's physicalsecurityandcontingency plans,thetrainingandqualifications criteriashouldberevisedtogivetheli-censeegreaterlatitudetodesignanddevelopsitespecifictrainingrequire-mentsandprogramstomeetsitespe-cificneeds.Inordertoaccomplish this,thetrainingandqualifications criteriahavebeenrevisedtorequireeach1!censeetosubmit.atrainingandqualifications planwhichoutlinestheprocesses bywhichguards,watchmen, armedresponsepersons,armedescortsandothermembersofthesecurityor-ganization willbeselected, trained,equipped, tested,andqualified toassuretheseindividuals meetthere-quirements.
(8)Securitymanagement.
Com.mentersstatedthatthecriterion whichspecifies atrainingprogramandhoursofInstruction formanagersdoesnotclearlydefoeuptowhatlevelofmanagement wouldberequiredtore-ceive,such trainfng.
Onecommenter statedtBatratherthanrequiring spe-cifictrainingformanagement, theNRCshouldspecifyminimumqualifi-cationsforthevariousfunctions withinmanagement andthattheNRCshouldprovideanyadditional securitytrainingthattheNRCdeemsneces-sary.InresponsetothesecommentstheCommission hasdecidedtodeletetherequirement forsecuritymanagement training.
Therevisedcriteriafortrain-ingandqualifications described in(7)abovewillassuretheCommission thattheproperlevelofmanagement willbeInvolvedinthedecisionmakingandImplementation processfnthequalifi-cationandtrainingofguards.(9)1Veaponstraining.
Mostcom-me>>tersstatedthatweaponstrainingrequirements:
(a)wereexcessive withrespecttonumberofhoursofinstruc-tionrequired; (b)werenotclearastowhoshouldundergothetraining:
(c)specified unnecessary trainingtime,sinceperformance requirements arelaterspecified insectionIVofappen-dix13;and(d)didnot,takeintoac.countindividuals wit,hpreviousweap-onsexperience.
FEDERAL'EGISTER, VOL43,NO.164-WEDNESDAY, AUGUSZ23,1970 IIn,responsetothesecommentstheCommission hasdecidedthattheweaponstrainingcriteriashouldbestatedintermsthatwouldpermitflexibility withrespecttohoursofin-struction requiredbasedonanindivid;ual'sexperience andtopermit'the li-censeetoidentifybysecurityrelatedjobtasksorduties,whichindividuals
~wouldberequiredtoqualifywithweaponsandtheweaponwithwhich~theywouldqualify.Toeffectthischangetheweaponstrainingcriteriahavebeenrevisedtodeletethenumberofhoursoftrainingrequiredtogivethelicenseetherequisite.flexi-bilityindetermining byjon.assign-mentwhowillreceivetrainingandtheextentoftrainingrequiredtoqualifywiththeassignedweapon.(10)Weaponsqualijication.
Com-mentersstatedthat:(a)It,wouldbedifficult toestablish andoperatethefiringrangesneededforweaponsqualification becauseoftrainingfacili-tylimitations; (b)therequirements forbothdayandnightrangefiringisnotnecessary toachieveandmaintainffrfngproficiency; (c)lightingpresent-lyrequiredatnuclearfacilities wouldpreemptanyneedfornightfiring;and(d)firingrangesarenotequippedtoduplicate lightingatnuclearfacilities.
Thiscanonlybedoneusingmilitarytypebattlefield illumination sourceswhicharebeyondthescopeofprivatelicensees.
InresponsetothesecommentstheCommission hasdecided:(a)Thatweaponsqualification requirements shouldberelaxedtogivethelicensees
~flexibility indesigning theirweaponsqualifications programsandtopermitlicenseearmedpersonnel toeitherfirethecoursespecified ortoselectanequivalent courseoffire;and(b)thatitfsnecessary to'requirearmedindi-avidualstoperformnighttime orsimu-latednighttime firingforfamiliariza-tiononly,becauseofthevaryingpsy-chological effectson'personsnotac-customedtonightfiring.Accordingly, weaponsqualification criteriahavebeenrevisedtopermitthelicenseetoeitherselectthecourseoffirespeci-fiedortochooseanequivalent courseoffiretoqualify.armedpersonnel.
Inaddition, thecriteriarequiresindivid-ualstoqualifyonlywithassignedweaponsasidentified inthelicensee's plan.(1'1)Suggestive phrases.Commeriters notedthat,phrasessuchas"'.'butnotlimitedto',"and"sap.propriate
,"weresuggestive, notdefinitive, andimplicitly requiremore.tobedone.Thccriteriain,appendix" Bhavebeenchangedtocliminatc thesephrases.Asrevised,therequirements arestatedbroadlyintermsofcapabili-tyandperformance topermitflexibil-
,ityinthedesignoftrainingandquall-RULESANORMGULATIOMS fications programs.
TheCommission believesthattherevisedrulewillassuretheupgradedqualityoflicens-eesecuritypersonnel sothatopcn-cnded,suggestive wordingisunneces-sary.(12)and(13)Licenseeplansubinit-talandimplementation.
Commenters statedthattheCommission didnotprovideforadequatetimetodevelopaplaninresponsetotheproposedre.quirements, orprovidesufficient timetoimplement theplanafterithasbeenapproved.
TheCommission agreesthatade;'quatetimemustbeallowedforproperplanningandimplementation toassureeffective programs.
Therulehasbeenchangedtoallowmoretimeforplanningandimplementation.
Inadditiontothecommentsthatre-sultedinchanges,intheproposedamendments, anumberofotherissueswerecommented onwhichdidnotresultinchangestotheproposedamendments, butwhichwarrantdis-cussionandexplanation.
'1)Securitypersonnel trainingmanuaLOnecommenter statedthatthetrainingmanualshouldnotbepublished asaNUREGdocumentifthemanualisintendedtodemonstrate oneacceptable approachtosatisfying therequirements oftheproposedreg-ulation.TheCommission hadintended~forthetrainingmanualtorepresent ageneralcourseoutlinefortrainingse-curitypersonnel andnottoprovidespecificparallelguidancetomeeteachoftherequirements ofappendixB.Itwasnotintendedasaregulatory guide.Thcutility~ofthetrainingmanualwillboenhanced, asageneraldocument, inlightoftherevisedamendments.
(2)Environmental impactstate-ment.Afewcommenters statedthatasapractical matterthedrasticin-creaseinsecuritypersonnel trainingrequirements proposedbytheamend-mentswouldundoubtedly requiread-ditionalsecurity, administrative, andrecordkeeping staff,therefore affectingotherpersonsratherthandealingonlywithf,hetrainingofexistingsecu-ritypersonnel; involvethepotential employment rightsandopportunities ofnumerousexistingandfuturesecu-ritypersonnel; andfnvolvethepoten-tialLssuanceofadvancedweaponrytoprivatesecurityforces.TheybelievedthattheCommission hastoonarrowlyconstrued theterm"environment" contrarytoCommiss'ion policyasstatedin10CFR51.1(a),concluding thatanenvironmental impactstate-mentisrequiredtosatisfyNRC'sobli-gationsunderNEPAandCEQguide-lines.TheCommission hasreviewedthecriteriaprovidedin10CFRPart,51,theCouncilonE>>vironmcntal Quality(CEQ)andNationalEn'vironmental PolicyAct(NEPA)guidelines inlight.of.thecommentsrcceivcdandcontin-uestobelievethatanenvironmental impactstatement fortheproposedamendments to10CFRPart'l3isnotrequired.
Them'aineffectoftheruleistorequiretrainingandqualification ofsecuritypersonnel andisbasically procedural, withnoenvironmental effeetworthnoting.(3)Guardupgrading.
Onecom-menterstatedthattheentireupgrad.ingofguardqualification, trainingandequipping wasunwarranted be-causehisfacilitymaintains liaisonwithlocallawenforcement authorities andthatthelocalauthorities havesu-periormanpower, trainingandequip.mentt,odealwithsecuritycontingen-ciesbeyondthecontrol.ofthesitese-curityorganization.
BasedontheJointERDA-NRCTaskForceon.Safeguards andtheSe-curityAgencyStudy(SAS)reports,theCommission decidedthattheup-gradingoflfcenseeguardqualitywasnecessary.
Insupportofthisdecision, theCommission alsocomparedthecontentandscopeoftrainingpro-gramssubmitted byeachlicenseetomeetthepresentrequirements withtheguidancetheNRCprovidedthroughregulatory guide5.20.There-sultsofthiscomparison revealedthatpresenttrainingprogramsfornelvguardswouldnotproducethequalityneededtoassuretheeffective protec-tionofspecialnuclearmaterials, facili-ties,orshipments.~The fact,thatli-censeesmaintainliaisonwithlocallawenforcement authorities wasconsid-eredinthedecisiontorequireup-gradedguardquality,accepting thatproximity to,responsetimeby,andthenumberofresponding localau-thorities couldbearonthedegreeofupgrading thatwouldberequiredinonsiteresponseforcenumbersandtac-ticaltrainingrequirements.
(4)Teargasormace.Numerouscom-mentsweremadethatthe,useoftear,,gasormacewouldviolatecertainStatelawswhichprohibitthcuseofsuclisubstances byprivatecitizens.
Teargasorothernonlethal gaseswillcontinuetoberequired, andwhereState,law prohibits suchpossession and.usebyprivatecitizens, adequately supported requestsforexemption maybegrantedor*equivalent alternative profectfonmeasures'may beproposed.Inconjunctfon witharequestforex-ceptionfromthespecificrequirement.
(5)Costs.Therewercafewcom-mentsmade"relative tocoststoimple-menttheproposedrcqulrements.
Onecommenter didprovide.acostestimatefortraininghisexistingguardforceplusannualcostfor'rafningnewhires.Nobasiswasgiventosupport,theseortheotherestlmatcs.
ThccostefSect,ivenessofalternative trainingFKDSMAtffCGISTN, VOL43,NO.Id4-V/EDHESDAY, AUGUST23,197S gN~I IIRULESANDREGULATIONS
.3'7425Ipr(Igrams wlIIbeinvestigated aspart.ofthelogist,ical managcmcnt st,udyIdentified Inparagraph 1.Staffhaspreparedavalue.impactassessment whichhasbccnplacedinthepublicdocumentroomwhichprovidesabreakdown ofthecostestimates in-cludingstatements ofbenefitwhen-everpossible.
TheImportant aspectoftheproposedregulation, asnowwritten,Isthatthejobrelatedperform-anceorientation willgivethelicenseegreaterfiexlbIIIty Indeveloping themostcost-effective trainingprogramforhisplantandtransport system.(6)AfewcommentswerereceivedinresponsetotheCommission's requestforcomments, recommendations, andcosttradeoffs onthealternate ap-proachesavailable fortrainingperson-nel,andthealternative ofcertifying trainingprogramsvs.certifying ofin-dividuals, toassisttheCommission inarrivingataconsensus astothemostcost-effective approachforconducting securitypersonnel training.
Thesecommentscanbecategorized generally asfollows:(I)Centralandregionaltrainingversuslocaltraining.
(Ii)Certification oftrainingpro-gramsversuscertification ofindivid-uals.(lii)Trainingcosts.'he following discussion pertainstoitems(I)through(Ili)above.(I)Commentsreceivedwerebothinfavorofandopposedtotheneedforestablishing centralorregionaltrain-ingfacIIItics.
Personsfavoringthees-tablishment ofcentralorregionaltrainingfacilities statedthatsuchfa-cilitiescouldbeestablished byorundercontracttotheNRC,possiblyusingexistingFederalinstallations.
Sincetherewouldbeonlyafewin-structors available withtheexpcrtisc ncccssary toteachsomeofthecoursesrequired, thestaffingofcentralorre-gionalfacilities wouldnotbedifficult, whildthesimultaneous staffingoflo-calizedtrainingfacilities maynotbeachievable.
Suchcommenters alsostatedthatwithcentralorregionaltrainingfacilities, changesintheCom-mission's regulations couldbeImple-menteddirectly; andthattheskilllevelsofgraduates wouldbeconsistent throughout theindustry.
Nocostfig-ureswercprovidedbycommenters ad'-vocatingthe'establishment ofcentralorregionalfacilitics.
Commenters opposingcentralorre-gionaltrainingfacilltics statedthattheexpensesfortransporting, fccding,andhousingindividuals atacentralorregionalfacilities wouldadd,substan-tiallytothecostfortraining.
Undercltherofthcsctrainingarrangcmcnts, lt;wouldbcdifficult toprovidesitespecifictrainingsufficient tomeettheneedsofeachlicensee.
Additionally, regionalcentersoracentralfacilitywouldnecessitate poolingofsecuritypersonnel fromvariouslicensees foreachclass"ofstudents, whichwouldin-creasetheprobability ofunauthorized.
'disclosure ofsensitive andproprietary licenseephysicalsecuritysystemin-formation.
Nocostcomparison esti-mateswereprovidedtosupportthepositionofcommenters opposedtocentralorregionaltrainingofsecuritypersonnel.
(Ii)Commenters statedthattheal-ternative ofcertifying trainingpro-gramsforaspecifictrainingcenterversuscertification ofsecurityperson-nelwouldonlybeacceptable fromacosteffective standpoint ifeachlicens-eeortheemployerofthepersonnel couldoperateitsowncertified trainingcenters.Onecommenter statedthattherequirements shouldbedefined,methodsforcertification identified, andactualtrainingprogramsbemadeavailable priorto.implementation oftheproposedrule.(ill)Afewcommenters providedgen-eralizedandunsupported costsforim-plementing theproposedamendments.
Theyalsoexpressed concernthattheywerelimitedinattracting youngerper-sonnelwhomightmeettherequire-ments,andhistorically, theyhaveex-perienced ahighturnoverrateinsecu-ritypersonnel whichwoulddrivethecostsfortrainingandretraining evenhigher.TheCommission agreesthatthereareeconomicadvantages anddisad-vantagesandotherproblemsassociat-edwiththealternative meansavaila-blefortraininglicenseesecuritypcr-sonel.Therevisedamendmcnts taheintoconsideration theCommission's objective toassurethatsecurityper-sonnelqualitybeuniformly upgradedatlicenseefacilities andintransporta-tion.Thiscanbeachievedbyeitherclosecoordination withalltrainingprograms, orbyameansforassuringthateach>ersonassignedtoperformsecuritytasksisproperlyequippedandqualified todoso.Therevisedamendments followthelatterap-proachanddonotspecifically addresstraining.details.
Nevertheless, theCommission isstillconcerned thatsomelevelofuniformity ofperform-anceshouldbeestablished forallaf-fectedlicensees.
AsstatedinJuly1977,theCommission willstudyalter-nativeapproaches totrainingperson-nelandthealternative ofcertifying trainingprogramsorindividuals.
Therelsunderwayalogistical manage-mentstudywhichshouldassisttheCommission Indecidingonthemostcost-effective approachavailable forcertification, andwillprovidetheli-censeesinformation onthecosteffec-tivenessofeachofthetrainingaltcr-nativcstomeetNRCrequirements.
Inaddition, theresultsofthestudyshouldprovideinformation ontheavailability ofinstructors withtheex-pertisenecessary totrainsecurityper-sonnel.Theresultsofthisstudyshouldbcavailable aroundNovember-15,1978.Theseresults,alongwiththeexperience gainedfromimplementa-tionoftheeffective rule,willbeusedinthedecisionmakingprocessbythcCommission todetermine whetheramorestructured systemoftrainingofsecuritypersonnel shouldberecom-mendedtolicensees.
TheCommission hasdetermined underCouncilofEnvironmental Qual-ityguidelines andthecriteriain10CFRPart51.5(d)(3),
thatneitheranenvironmental impactstatement norenvironmental impactappraisal tosupportanegativedeclaration fortheproposedamendmcnts to10CFRPart73isrequiredbecausetheamend-mentsdealprimarily withthequalifi-cationandtrainingofexistingsecuritypersonnel anddonotdirectlyorIndi-rectlyaffecttheenvironment.
PursuanttotheAtomicEnergyActof1954,asamended.theEnergyReor-ganization Actof1974,asamended,andsections552and553oftitle5oftheUnitedStatesCode,noticeIsherebygiventhatthefollowing amendments toTitle10,Chapter1,CodeofFederalRegulations, Part73arepublished asadocumentsubjecttocodification.
1.Section73.2of10CFRPart73isam'endedtoadd-paragraphs (t)through(w).g73.2Deiinltlons.
Asusedlnthispart:~~(t)"Armedresponsepersonnel" meanspersons,notnecessarily uni-formed,whoseprimarydutyintheeventofattempted theftofspecialnu-clearmaterialorindustrial sabotageshallbetorespond,armedandequipped, topreventordelaysuchac.tions.(u)"Armedescort"meansanarmedpersonnot necessarily uniformed, whoseprimarydutyIstoaccompany shipments ofspecialnuclearmaterialfor'theprotection ofsuchshipments againsttheftorindustrial sabotage.,
(v)"Security management" meanspersonsresponsible forsccurltyatthepolicyandgeneralmanagement level.(w)"Security supervision" meanspersons,notnecessarily uniformed orarmed.whoseprimaryduties'are su-pervision anddirection ofsecurity.at theday-todayoperating level.2,Paragraphs 73.30(d)and73.30(e)of10CFRPart,73arcrevisedtoreadasfollows:g73.30Generalrequirements.
FEDERALREGISTER, Vol.43,NO.164-WEDNESDAY, AUGUST23,'l918 rI'Ira3'l~i2G(d)Whenarmedescortsareuse.pursuanttoH73.31(c)(1),
73.31(c)(2 73.33,and73.35,thelicensccshallnpermitanindividual toactasaarmedescortunlesssuchindividuhasbeentrained.equipped, andqualfiedtoperformeachassignedsecurityjobdutyinaccordance withAppendixB,"GeneralCriteriaforSecurityPer-sonnel,"ofthispart.Upontherequestofanauthorized representative oftheCommission thelicenseeshalldemon-stratetheabilityofthephysicalsecu-ritypersonnel tocarryouttheiras-signed.dutiesandresponsibilities.
Armedescortsshallrequalify inac-cordancewithappendixBofthispartatleastevery12months.Suchrequali-'icatloII shallbedocumented.
(e)Priortotransporting specialnu-clearmaterialsubjecttothephysicalprotection requirements ofthispart,eachlicenseeshallsubmitaplanout-liningtheprocedures thatwillbeusedtomeettherequirements of073.30through73.36and73.70(g).
By(120:daysaftertherulebecomeseffective) eachlicenseeshallsubmitatrainingandqualifications planoutlining theprocesses bywhicharmedescortswillbeselected, trained,equipped, tested,andqualified toassuretheseindivid-ualsmeet,therequirements ofpara-graph(d)ofthissection.Thetrainingandqualifications planshallincludeascheduletoshowhowallarmedescortswillbequalified by(within2yearsaftertherulebecomeseffective) orwithin2yearsafterthesubmitted planisapproved.
whichever islater.Thetrainingandqualifica-tions.plan shallbefollowedbytheli-censeeafter(180daysaftertherulebecomeseffective) or60daysafterthesubmitted planisapprovedbytheNRC,whichever Islater.(h)By(120daysaftertherulebe-comeseffective) eachlicenseeshallsubmitatrainingandqualifications planoutlining theprocesses bywhichguards,watchmen.
armedresponsepersonsandothermembersofthese-curityorganization willbeselected, trained,equipped, tested,andquali.fiedtoassuretheseMdividuals meettherequirements ofparagraph (a)(4)ofthissection.Thetrainingandquali-fications planshallincludeascheduletoshowhowallsecuritypersonnel willbequalified by(within2yearsaftertherulebecomeseffective) orwithintwoyearsafterthesubmitted planisapproved, whichever islater.Thetrainingandqualifications planshallbefollowedbythelicenseeafter(180daysaftertherulebecomeseffective) or60daysafterthesubmitted planisapprovedbytheNRC,whichever islater.4.Paragraph 73.55(b)(4) of10CFRPartV3lsrevisedtoreadasfollows:'73.65Requirements I'orphysicalprotec-tionoflicensedactivities InnuclearpowerreactorsagztlIIst Industrial snbo.(age.~~'(b)(4)Thclicenseeshallnotpermitanindividual toactasaguard,watch-man.armedresponseperson,orothermemberofthesecurityorganization unlesssuchindividual hasbeentrained,equipped, andqualified toperformeachassignedsecurityjobdutyinaccordance withAppendixB,"GeneralCriteriaforSecurityPerson-3.Paragraph 73.50(a)(4) and'V3.50(h) of10CFRPart73arerevisedtoreadasfollows:$73.60Requirements forphysicalprotec-tIDIIoflicensedactivities.
~~~(a)4)Thelicenseeshallnotpermitanindividual toactasaguard,watchman, armedresponseperson,orothermemberofthesecurityorganiza-tionunlesssuchindividual hasbeen-trained,equipped.
andqualified toperform.each assignedsecurityjobdutyinaccordance withAppendixB,."General CriteriaforSecurityPerson-nel,"ofthispart.Upontherequestofanauthorized representative oftheCommission thelicenseeshalldemon-stratetheabilityofthephysicalsecu-ritypersonnel tocarryouttheiras-signeddutiesandresponsibilities.
Eachguard,watchman, armedrc-nel,"ofthispart.Uponthcrequestofanauthorized representative ofthe.Commission thelicenseeshalldemon-stratetheabilityofthcphysicalsecu-ritypersonnel tocarryouttheiras-signeddutiesandresponsibuities.
Eachguard,watchman, armedre-sponseperson,andothermemberofthesecurityorganization shallrcqua-lifyinaccordance withappendixBof'hispartatleastevery12months.Suchrequalification shallbedocu-mented.By(300daysaftertherulebecomeseffective) eachlicenseeshallsubmitatrainingandqualifications planoutlining theprocesses bywhichguards,watchmen, armedresponsepersons,andothermcmbcrsofthese-curityorganization willbcsclccted, trained,equipped, tested,andquail.fiedtoassuretheseIndividuals mcctRULEShNDREGULATIONS
'"dsponseperson,andothermemberof),thesecurityorganization shallrequa-otlifyinaccordance withappendixBofnthispartatleastevery12months.alSuchrequalification shallbedocu-I-mented.therequirements ofthisparagraph.
Thetrainingandqualifications planshallincludeascheduletoshowhowallsecuritypersonnel willbequalified by(within2yearsaftertherulebe-comeseffective) orwithin2yearsafterthesubmitted planIsapproved, whichever islater.Thetrainingandqualifications planshallbefollowedbythelicenseeafter(500daysaftertherulebecomeseffective) or60daysafterthesubmitted planisapprovedbytheNRC,whichever islater.5.AnewAppendixBentitled-Gen-eralCriteriaforSecurityPersonnel" isaddedto10CFRPart,V3toreadasfollows:APPENDIXBGENERALCRITERIAFORSECURITFPERSONNEL TABLEOFCONTENTSIntroductIDIL Definitions.
Criteria.
LEmployment suitability andqualifica-tion.A.Suitability.
B.Physicalandmentalqualifications.
~C.Physicalfitnessqualifications.
D.Contractsecuritypersonnel.
E.Physicalrequalification.
F.Documentation.
.~-II.TrainingandquallflcatloILs.
A.Trainingrequirements.
B.Qualification requirements.
C.Contractpersonnel.
D.Securityknowledge, skills,andabill.tICB.E.RequallficatioIL III.Weaponstrainingandqualification.
IV.Weaponsqualification andrequalifica.
tionprogram.V.Guard,armedresponsepersonnel
~andarmedescortequipment.
A.FIxedsite.B.TransportatloIL INTRDDUcrIoN Pursuanttotheprovisions of73.50and73.55of10CFRpart73,Requirements forPhysicalProtection ofPlantsandMaterials, eachlicenseewhoIsauthorized toconductcertainactivities withspecI(lcd quMItltles ofspecialnuclearmaterialpursuantto10CFRPart70andeachIlccnsccwhoIsauthorized tooperateaproduction orutlllzatlon facill~typursuantto10CFRpart60,respectively, Isrequiredtoestablish asecurityorganiza.
tion,.Including trainedandequippedguardstophysically protectBPCcialnuclearmateri.alintheirpossess/on BIIdtheirfacilities againsttheftMIdIndustrial sabotage.
Further,pursuanttotheprovisions ofV3.30throughV3:36of10CFRpart73,cer-talIIshipments ofepeclalnuclearmaterialarercqulrcdtobcaccompanied byarmedes-corts.Securitypersonnel whoareresponsible fortheprotection ofspecialnuclearmateri~aloILslleaIIdIntransitandfortheprotec.tlonofthefacilityorshipmentvehicleagainstIndustrial sabotageshould,IlkCotherelementsofthebhyslcBI=
securitysystem.berequiredtomeetminimumcrite.rlatoassurethILttheywIIIeffectively per.formIhe(rasslgIICd securityrelatedjobduties.InordertoassurethatthoseIndivld.uaIsresponsible forsecurityareproperlyequippedandqualified toexecu(ctheIobFEDNAEREOISTEII, Voto43,NO.164VVEDNESDAY, AUGUST23,1978 PUKSANOREGULATJONS 3V42Vdutiesprescribed fofthem,l,heNRChasde.v9)opedgeneralcriteriawhichspecifies se.curitypersonnel qua))fie>Lion rcqulremenl".
Thesegeneralcriteriaestablish require.mentsforthcselection.
training.
equipping, testing,andqualification ofIndividuals whowillbcresponsible forprotecting specialnu.clearrnaterlals, nuclearfacll!ties, andnuclc.arshipments.
DzrINrrloNS TermsdefinedInparts50,70,and')3ofthischapterhavethesamemeaningwhenusedinthisappendix.
CRITERlhI.Emp!oyment su!tab)Bty andqualification.
A.Suitability:
1.Priortoemployment, orassignment tothesecurityorganization, anIndividual shallmeetthefollowing su)tab)I.
Itycriteria:
a.Educational development-Possess ahighschooldiplomaorpassanequivalent performance examination designedtomeas-urebasicJobrelatedmathematical, lan.guagc,andreasoning skills,ability,andknowledge, requiredtoperformsecurityJobduties.b.Felonyconvictions-Have nofelonyconvictions Involving theuseofaweaponandnofelonyconvictions thatreflectontheIndividual's reliability.
2.Priortoemployment orass)gnment tothesecurityorganization lnanarmedcapac..Ity,thcIndividual, Inadditionto(a)and(b)above,mustbe21yearsofageorolder.B.Physicalandmentalqual)Bcations.
1.Physicalqualifications:
a.Individuals whosesecuritytasksandJobdutiesaredirectlyassociated withtheeffec-tiveimplementation ofthelicenseephysicalsccurltyandcont)ngcncy plansshallhavenophysicalweaknesses orabnorma))t)es thaLv:ouldadversely affecttheirperform.anceofassignedsecurityjobduties.b;Inadditiontoa.above,guards,armedresponsepcrsonncl, armedescorts,andccn.tralalarmstationoperators shallsuccessful-lypassaphysicalexamination administered byalicensedphysician.
Thcexamination shallbedesignedtomeasurethelndivld.ual'sphysicalabilitytope'rformassignedse-curityJobdutiesasidentified Inthclicenseephysicalsecurityandcontingency P)ans.Armedpersonnel shallmeetthefollowing additional physicalrequirements:
(I)Vision:(a)Foreach'ndividual.
distant~visualacuityineachcycshallbccorrectable to20/30(Snellcnorequivalent) lnthebettereyeand20/40Intheothercycw'itheycglasscs orcontactlenses.Ifuncorrected distancevisionis'notatleast20/40Jnthcbettereyc,theindividual shallca>ryanextrapairofcorrccL)vc
)cnses.Nearvtsua)acuity,corrected oruncorrected, shallbcat)cast20/40lnthebettereye.Fieldofvision.mustbeat)cast70'orizontal meridianln~eachcyc.Thcabilitytodistinguish red.green,andyellowcolorsIsrequired.
LossofvisionInonceyeIsdisqualifying.
Glaucomashallbedisqualifying, unlesscontrol)cd byacccptablc medicalorsurgicalmeans,pro-videdsuchmedlcatlons asmaybeusedforcontrol)lng glaucomadonotcauseundesira-blesideeffectsvrhlchadversely, affect,thcIndividual's abilitytoperformassignedsu.curltyJobduties,andprovidedthevisualacuityandfieldofvisionrcqulrcmcnts statedabovearemet.On.the-jobevaluation shallbcusedforindividuals v:hocxhlb)Lamildeo)orvisiondcfcct.(b)Wherecorrective eyeglasses arere.quired,theyshallbcofthesafetyglasstype.(c)Theuseofcorrective eyeglasses orcon.tactlensesshallnotIntcrferc withanIndi.vidual'sabilitytoeffectively performes.signedsecurityjobdutiesduringnormalorcmcrgency operations.
(2)Hearing.(a)Individuals shallhavenohcarlru:lossInthcbettercargreaterthan30decibclsaverageat500hz,1.000Hz.and2.000EIz,withnolevelgreaterthan40decl.belsatanyonefrequency (byISO1964orANSI1969audiometry).
(b)Ahearingaidisaccepablc providedsuitabletestingprocedures demonstrate hu.dltoryacuityequivalent totheabovestatedrequirement.
(c)Thcuscofahearingaidshallnotde.creasetheeffective performance oftheIndi-vidual'sassignedsecurityJobdutiesduringnormaloremergency opcratlons.
(3)Diseases-Individuals shallhavenoes-tablished medicalhistoryormedicaldiagno-sisofepilepsyordiabetes, or.wheresuchacondition exists,theIndividual shallprovidemedicalevidencethatthecondition canbccontrolled withpropermedication sothattheIndividual willnotlapseIntoacomaorunconscious statewhileperforming assignedsecurityjobduties.(4)Addiction-Individuals shallhavenoes.tabllshed medicalhistoryormedicaldiagno-'is ofhabitualalcoholism ordrugaddiction, or.wheresuchacondition hasexisted,theindividual shallprovidecertified documen-tationofhavingcompleted arehabilitation programwhichwouldgiveareasonable degreeofconfidence thattheindividual wouldbecapableofperforming assignedse-curityJobduties.(5)Otherphysicalrequirements-An Indi-vidualwhohasbeenincapacitated duetoaseriousillness.injury,disease,oroperation, whichcouldInterfere withtheeffective per-formanceofassignedsecurityJobdutiesshall.priortoresumption ofsuchduties.providemedicalevidenceofrecoveryandabilitytoperformsuchsecurityJobdut)es.2.Ifenta)quaBficatlons:
a.'Individuals whosesecuritytasksandJobdutiesarcdi-rectlyassociated withtheeffective implc-mcntatlon ofthelicenseephysicalsecurityandcontingency plansshalldemonstrate mentalalertness andthecapabi)ILy tocxcr-clsegoodJudgment.
Implement Instructions, assimilate assignedsecuritytasks,andpos.sessthcacuityofscnscsandabilityofex-pressionsufficient topermitaccuratecom-munication byv:ritten.
spoken.audible,visi-ble,orothersignalsrequiredbyassignedJobduties.b.ArmedIndividuals, andcentralalarmstationoperators, inadditiontomeetingthcrequirement statedinparagraph a.above,shall.havenoemotional instability that.wouldInterfere withtheeffective perform.anceofassignedsecurityJobduties.Thede-termination shallbemadebyalicensedpsy-chologisL orpsychiatrist.
orphysician.
orotherpersonprofessionally trainedtoiden.tlfyemotional instability.
c.Thelicenseeshallarrangeforcontinued observai,ion ofsecuritypcrsonne) andforappropriate corrective measuresbyrespon-siblesupervisors forindications ofemotion:alInstabi)ILy ofindividuals inLhecourseofperforming assignedsecurityJobduties.Identification oi"emotional instability byre.sponsible supervisors shallbesubJcct,tover-ification byaliccnscd.
trainedperson.C.Physicalfltncssqualifications-SubJect, toamedicalexamination conducted v:ithlnthepreceding 30daysandtoadetennlna-tlonandwrittencertification byalicensedphysician thattherearenomedicalcontra-indlcaLnstoparticipation bytheIndividu-alasdisclosed bythemedicalexamination.
guards.armedresponsepersonnel andarmedescortsshalldemonstrate physicalfitnessfrassignedsecurityJobdutiesbyperform)ng apractical physicalcxcrcisepro-gramwithinaspecifictimeperiod.Theex-erciseprogramperformance objectives shallbcdescribed Inthelicenseetrainingandqualifications plan,andshallconsidersuchJobrelatedfunctions asstrenuous activity.
physicalexertion, levelsofstress,andexpo-suretotheelementsastneypertaintoeachindividual's assignedsecurityJobdutiesforbothnormalandemergency operations.
Thephysicalfitnessqualification ofeachguard,armedresponseperson~andarmedescortshallbedocumented andattested'y ali-censeesecuritysupervisor.
D.Contractsecuritypersonnel-Contract securitypersonnel shallbcrequiredtomeetthesuitability,
- physical, andmentalrequire.mentsasappropriate totheirassignedsecu.rityJobdutiesinaccordance withsectionIofthisappendix.
E.Physicalrequallflcatlon-At leastevery12months,centralalarmstationoperators shallberequiredtomeetthephysicalre-quirements ofB.l.bofthissectionandguards,armedresponsepersonnel andarmedescorts,shallbcrequiredtomeetthephysicalrequirements ofparagraphs B.l.b(1)and(2),andCofthissection.F.Documentation-The resultsofsuitabll)Ly,physical, andmentalqualifications dataandtestresultsshallbedocumented bythclicenseeorhisagent.G.Nothinghereinauthorizes orrequiresallcenscctoinvestigate IntoorJudgethereadinghabits,poll),ical orreligious beliefs.orattitudes onsocial.economic, orpolitica)
Issuesofanyperson.ILTrainingandqualifications.
A.Train)ngrequirements-Each lndlvldu.
alwhorequirestrainingtoperformassignedsecurityrelatedJobtasksorJobdutiesasIdentlflcdInthelicenseephysicalsecurityorcontingency plans,shallpriortoassign-ment,bctrainedtoperformsuchtasksanddutiesInaccordance withthelicenseeorh)sagent'sdocumented trainingandqualificat-ionssplan.'.Qua))flcatlon requ)rements-Each personwhoperformssecurityrelatedJobtasksorJobduL)csrequiredtoImp)ement thclicenseephysicalsecurityorcontlngen.
cyplanshall.priortobeingassignedtosuchtasksorduties,bcqualified inaccordance wiLhthclicensee's NRCapprovedtrainingandqualifications plan.Thequalifications ofeachIndividual shallbcdocumented andattestedbyalicenseesecuritysupervisor.
C.Contract, personnel-Contract pcrsnn-nclshallbctrained,equipped, andqualified asappropriate totheirassignedsecurityre-latedJobtasksorJobduties,Inaccordance tvithsectionsII,III,IV.andVofthisap.pcndlx.Thequalifications ofeachIndividu.
alshallbcdocumented andattestedbyali-censeesecuritysupervisor.
D.Securityknowledge, skills.andabili-ties-Each Individual assignedtoperformthesecurityrelatedteakIdentified Intheli-cense(physicalsecurityorcontingency plansiva)idemonstrate thcrequiredknowledge.
skill.RndabilityInaccordance v;iththespecified standards foreachtaskasstatedFEDERALREGISTER, VOI43,NO.)64-WEDNESDAY, AUGUST23,1978 37498RULESANDREGUULTIONS lnthcNRCapprovedlicenseetrainingandqualitications plan.Theareasofknowledge, skills,andabilities thatshallbeconsidered Inthellccnsec's training'nnd qualifications planarcasfollows:1.Protection ofnuclearfacilities.
trans.portvehicles, andspecialnuclearmaterial.
2.NRCrequirements andguidanceforphysicalsecurityatnuclearfacilities andfortrallsportatlon.
3.Theprivatesecurityguard'sroleinpro-vidingphysicalprotection forthenuclearindustry.
4.Theauthority ofprivateguards.5.Theuseofnonlethal weapons.B.Theuseofdeadlyforce.'I.Powerotarrestandauthority todetainindividuals.
8.Authority tosearchIndividuals andseizeproperty.
9.Adversary groupoperations.
10.Motlvatlon andobjectives ofadversary groups.11.Tacticsandforcethatmightbeusedbyadversary groupstoachievetheirobjec-tives.12.Recognltlon ofsabotagerelatedde-vlccsandequipment thatmightbeusedagahlstthelicensee's facilityorshipmentvehicle.13.Facilitysecurityorganization andop-eration.14.Typesofphysicalbarriers.
15.Weapons,lockandkeycontrolsystemoperation.
16.LocattonofSNMand/orvitalareaswithtnafacility.
17.Protcctcd aressecurityandvulnerabil.
Ity.18.Typesofalarmsystemsused.19.Responsenndassessment toalarman-nunclations andotherIndications ofIntru-sion.20.Familiarization withtypesofspecialnuclearmaterialprocessed.
21.Generalconceptsofflxcdsitesecuritysystem".22.Vulnerabllltles nndconsequences oftheftofspecialnuclearmaterialorindustri-
.al'sabotage ofafacility.
23.Protection.
ofsecuritysystemInfonna-tlon.24.Personalequipment uscandoperation fornormalandcontingency operations.
25:Surveillance andasscssmcnt systemsandtechniques.
26.Communications systemsoperation, fixedsite.27.Accesscontrolsystemsandoperation forindividuals, packages.
nndvehicles.
- 28.Contraband detection systemsandtechniques.
29.Barriersandother'elay systemsaroundmaterialaccessorvitalareas.30.Fxtcriorandinterioralarmsystcnlsoperation.
~31.Duressalarmoperation.
32.Alarmstationsoperation.
33.Responseforceorganization.
34.Responseforcemission35.Responseforceoperation.
30.Responseforcecngngcmcnt.
37.Securitycommandnndcontrolsystem'uringnornntoperation.
38.Securitycomnlandnndcontrolsystemduringcontingency operation.
35.Transportation systenlSseCurityorgn.nizatlonnndoperation.
40.TypesofSNMtrnnsporC vehicles.
41.'I'ypcsofSNMcscorLvehicles.
42.ModesoftrnnsportnLion forSNM.43.Roadtransport securitysystemccm-mindandcontrolstructure.
44.Uscofweapons.45.Communications systemsoperation fortransportation, shtpmenCtocontrolcenterandlntraconvoy.
46.Vulnerabllitles andconsequences oftheftofspecialnuclearmaterialorIndustrl.
nlsabotageofatransport vehicle.47.Protection oftransport systemsecuri.tyinformation.
48.Controlofareaaroundtransport vehi-cle.49.Normalconvoytechniques andoper-,ations.50.Familiarization withtypesofspecialnuclearmaterials shipped.51.Fixedpost,stationoperations.
52.Accesscontrolsystemoperation.
53.Searchtechniques andsystemsforIn-dividuals, packagesandvehicles.
54.Escortandpatrolresponsibilities andoperation.
55.Contengency rcsponsctoconfirmed in-trusionorattempted Intrusion.
56.Securitysystemoperation aftercom-ponentfailure.57.FixedsitesecurityInformation protec-tion.58.Securitycoordination withlocallawenforcement agencies.
59.Securityandsituation reporting, docu.mentation andrcportwriting.60.Contingency duties.61.Seltdefense.82.UseofanddefensesagainstIncapaci-tatingagents.63.Securityequipment testing.84.Contingency procedures.
65.Nightvtstondevicesandsystems.66.Mechanics ofdetention.
67.Basicarmedandunarmeddefensive tactics.68.Responseforcedeployment.
69.Securityalertprocedures.
'10.Securii,y brieflngprocedures.
'll.Responseforcetacticalmovement.
-72.Responseforcewithdrawal.
73.Rcponseforceuseofsupportfire.74.Responsetobombandattackthreats.75..Response.
tocivildisturbances (e.g.,strikes,demonstrators).
'lB.Responsetoconfirmed attempted thefCotspecialnuclearmaterialand/orIn-dustrialsabotageoftacilltles.
77.Responsetohostagesituations.
78.Sitespecificarmedtacticalprocedures andoperation.
79.Securityresponsetoemergency situa.tionsotherthansecurityincidents.
80.Basictransportation
.dctcnslve re-sponsetactics.81.Armedescortdcploymcnt.
82.Armedescortadversary engagement.
83.Armedescortformations.
84.Armedescortuseofweaponsfire(tac-t!catandcombat).85.Armedescortandshipmentmovementunderfire.86.Tacticalconvoying techniques andop.crations.
87,ArmedescorttacticalexcrcLses.
88.Armedescortresponsetobombnndattackthreats.89.Verification ofshipmentdocumcnta.
tionandcontents.
90.Continuous surveillance ofshtpmcntvehicle.91.Normalandcontingency operation forshtpmenLmodetransfer.
52.Armedpersonnel procedures andoper.ationduringtemporary storage.betweenmodetransfers ofshipments.
93.Armedescortthreatassessment andresponse.
94.Systemforandoperation ofshipmentvehiclelockandkeycontrol.95.Tcchnlques andprocedures forIsola-tlonofshipmentvehicleduringacontlngen.
eysituation.
96.Transportation coordination withlocallawenforccmcnt agencies.
97.Procedures forverification ofship.mentlocksandseals.98.Transportation securityandsituation rcportlng, documentation, andreport,writ-ing.99.Procedures forshipmentdeliverynndpickup.100.Transportation securitysystemforescortbyroad,rail,atrandsca.E.Requallfication-Security personnel shallberequalified atleastevery12monthstoperformassignedsecurityrelatedjobtasksanddutiesforbothnormalandcon-tingencyoperations.
Requallfication shallbctnaccordance withtheNRCapprovedli-censeetrainingandqualifications plan.Theresultsofrcqualificationshallbedocument-edandattestedbyalicenseesecuritysuper-visor.III.Weaponstraining.
A.Guards,armedresponsepersonnel and.armedescortsrequiring weaponstrainingtoperformassignedsecurityrelatedjobtasks'orjobdutiesshallbetrainedInaccordance withthclicensees'ocumented weaponstralnlngprograms.
EachIndividual shallbeproficient intheuseofhisassignedweapon(s) andshallmeetprescribed stand.ardsInthefollowing areas:I~Mechanical
- assembly, dissasembly, rangepenetration capnbllltity ofweapon,'nd bullseyefiring.2.Weaponscleaningandstorage.3.Combatfiring.dayandnight.4.Safeweaponshandling.
5.Clearing, loading,unloading, andre-loading.6.Whentodrawandpointaweapon.7.Rapidfiretechniques.
8.Closequarterfiring.10.Zeroingassignedwenpon(s).
IV.Weaponsqualification nndrequalifica.
tlonprogram.Qualification firingforthehandgunandthcrNcshallbefordayltghtfiring,andeachIndividual shall.perform nightfiringforfamiliarization withassignedweapons(s).
Theresultsofweaponsquallfi.cationandrequallficationshallbcdocu-mcntcdbythelicenseeorhisagent.A.Handgun-Guards, armedescortsandarmedresponsepersonnel shallqualifyv:I(h,arevolverorsdmlautomatic pistolfiringthenationalpolicecourse.oranequivalent nn.ttonnllyrecognized course.Qualifying scoreshallbeariaccumulated Lotnlof'l0llcrcentofthemaximumobtainable score.B.Scmtautomatic Rifle-Guards.
armedescortsandarmedresponsepcrsollnel.
as-signedtousethcsemiautomatic riflebytheIlccnseetrainingandqualifications plan,shallqualifywithascmLautomatlc riflebyfiringthc100-yardcourseoffirespecified insection17.5(1)otthcNationalRifleAssoci.,nLlon,HighPowerItltlcRulesbook(effcc.tiveMarch15,1970).'ranationally rccog.'Copiesofthe"NRAHighPowerRifleRules"maybeexaminedat,orobtainedfrom,thcNationalRifleAssociation, 1600RhodeIslandAvenueNXV.,Washington.
D.C.20036.TEDERALREGISTER/
VOL43NOI54llVEDNESDAYi AUGUST23'978 RULESANDREGULATIOtlS 3V429n7zedequivalent courseo!fire.TargetsusedshallbeasstatedInsection17.5forthe100.,yardcourse.TimelimitsforIndividuals shallbeasspeci(led Insection8.2ofthcNRArulcbook,regardless ofthecoursefired.Qualifying scoreshallbcanaccurnu-latedtotalof80percentofthemaximumobtainable score.C.Shotgun-Guards.
armedescorts.andarmedresponsepersonnel assignedtousethe12gaugeshotgunbythelicenseetrain.Ingandqualifications planshallqualifywithafullchokeorimprovedmodifiedchoke12gaugeshotgunfiringthefollowing course:RangePosiuonNo.Rounds'arsct'5 yds..HipCirepoint.ZSyds.Shoulder..~The4roundsshallbefiredat4separateiarseiswithinIOsecondsusinsm)gauze(9pellet)shotgunshells.~AsscL(orthbytheNationalRl(icAssociation (NRA)InIisoflicialrulesandrerrulanorrs.
-NRATargetManufacturers Index,"December197$.~To.qualify thcIndividual shallberequiredtoplace50percentofallpellets(36pellets)withintheblacksilhouette.
D.Rcquallflcatlon-Individuals shallbcweaponsrequalified atleastevery12monthsInaccordance withtheNRCap-provedliccnsectrainingandqualifications plan,andInaccordance withtherequire-mentsstatedInA,B,andCofthissection.V.Guard,armedresponsepersonnel, andarmedescortequipment.
A.FixedSite-Fixed siteguardsandarmedresponsepersonnel shalleitherbeequippedwithorhateavailable thcfollow-Ingsecurityequipment appropriate totheIndividual's assignedcontingency securityrclatcdtasksorjobdutiesasdescribed Inthclicensccphysicalsecurityandcontin.gencyplans:1.Semiautomatic rifleswithfollowing
.nominalmlnlmumspecifications:
(a).223caliber.(b)Muzzlevelocity, 1980ft/sec.(c)Mruzieenergy,955footpounds.(d)Magazineorcliploadof10rounds.(c)Magazinereload,010seconds.(f)operableInanyenvironment InwhichItwDIbemused.2.12gaugeshotgunswiththefollowing capabilities:
(a)4roundpumporsemiautomatic.
(b)OperableInanyenvironment InwhichItwillbcused..(c)Fullormodifiedchoke.3.Semiautomatic pistolsorrevolvcrs withthefollowing nominalminimumspec!flea.
(fons:(a).354caliber.(b)Muzzleenergy.250foot-pounds.
(c)Fullmagazineorcylinderreloadcapa-bility06seconds.(d)Muzzlevelocity, 850ft/sec.(c)Fullcylinderormagazinecapacity, 6rourlds.(f)OperableInanyenvironment InwhichItwillbeused.4.Ammunition:
(a)Foreachassignedweaponasappropri~atctothcIndividual's assignedcontingency securityJobdutiesandasreadilyavailable asthcweapon:(I)18roundsperhandgun.(2)100roundspcrsemiautomatic rifle.(3)12roundseachpershotgun(00gaugeandslur).(b)Ammunition available onsite-two(2)timestheamountstatedIn(a)aboveforeachweapon.5.Personalequipment tobereadilyavaila-bleforIndividuals whoseassignedcontin.gencysecurityjobduties.asdescribed Inthelicenseephysicalsecurityandcontingency plans,warrantsuchequipment:
(a)Helmet,combat.(b)Gasmask,fullface.~(c)Bodyarmor(bullet.resistant vest).(d)Flashlights andbatteries.
(e)Baton.(f)Handcuffs.
(g)Ai(lmunltlon/equipment belt.6.Binocula..
7.Nightvisionaids,I.e.,handfiredllluml.nationflaresorequivalent.
8.Teargasorothernonlethal gas.9.Duressalarms.10.Two.wayportableradios(handltallde)2channelsminimum,1operating and1emergency.
B.Transportation-Armed escortsshalleitherbeequippedwithorhavercadllyavailable thefollowing securityequipment appropriate totheIndividual's assignedcon.tlngencysecurityrelatedtasksorJobduties,asdescribed inthelicenseephysicalsecurityandcontingency plans:1.Semiautomatic rifleswiththefollowing nominalminimumspecifications:
(a).223caliber.(b)Muzzlevelocity, 1.980ft/sec.(c)Muzzleenergy,955Cootpounds.(d)Magazineorclipof10rounds.(e)Reloadcapability10 seconds.(f)OperableInanyenvironment lnwhichItwillbeused.2.12gaugeshotguns.
(a)4roundpumporsemiautomatic.
(b)OperableInanyenvironment InwhichItwillbeused.(c)Fullormodifiedchoke.3..Semiautomatic phtolsorrevolvers withthefollowing nominalminimumspec!flea.
Lions:(a).354caliber.(b)Muzzleenergy,250foot-pounds.
(c)Fullmagazineorcylinderreloadcapa-bilitys6seconds.(d)Muzzlevelocity, 850ft/sec.(e)Fullcylinderormagazinecapacity, 6rounds.(f)Operablelnanyenvironment Inwhichitwillbeused.4.Ammunition foreachshipment.
(a)Foreachassignedweaponasappropri-atetothcIndividual's assignedcontingency securityJobdutiesandasreadilyavailable astheweapon:(1)36roundsperhandgun.(2)120roundspcrsemiautomatic rifie.(3)12roundseachpcrshotgun(00gaugeandslug).5.Escortvehicles, bulletresisting, equippedwithcommunications systems,rcdflares,firstaidkit,emcrgcncy toolkit,Lirechangingequipment, batterychargcrs, forradios(whereappropriate, forrccharglng portableradiobattcrlcs).
6.Personalcqulpmcnt tobereadilyavalla.bleforIndividuals whoseassignedcont(n.gcncysecurityJobduties,asdescribed lnthclicenseephysicalsecurityandcontingency plans.warrantsuchequipment:
(a)Hehnet.combat(b)Gasmask,fullface.(c)Bodyarmor(bulletresistant vesL).(d)Flaslillghts andbatteries.
[6750-01]
Titlo16-CommorCHAPTER1-FEDCOMMIS[Docket8ialPractices RALTRADEON20]PART13-PROHIBITETICES,ANDAfFITIVEACTIONSRotaiiCrAGENCY:FederalTrACTION:Finalorder.SUMMARY:'Thisorthings,reqtiires anAttorandseilcrofconsmationtodivestIwithinIyear,oftheSaiein,Oreg.(CBWesCreditBureauofWsubjecttoCommissio providepurchaser, fcopiesofitscurrentthatwillpermitacqandsellcreditreportstionallybarsthefifromenteringintotractswithdivestedcfromacquiring, withosionsanction, anycolthebusinessofcolicingconsumercreditIDATES:Complaint 1973.FinalorderissuFORFURTHERCONTACl".
AlfredF.DougherBureauofComTradeCommission, Pennsylvania Avenuton,D.C.20580,202SUPPLEMENTARY IInthematterofretaiTRADEPRAC-TIVECORREC-tCo.deCommission.
r,amongothernta,Ga.collec-ercreditIrrfor-elfcompletely.
reditBureauofCoast),andthehington,D.C.,)approval; and3years,with.filesinaform'rertoprepareTheorderaddi-;for10years,nagementcon-rporations.
andtpriorContmis-ernengagediningandreport-ormation.
ucdMarch9.July7,1978'FORMATION
,Jr.,Director, tition,Federal6thStteetandNW.~Wosbing-23-3601.ORMATION:
creditcompany,'CopiesofthccomplaiopinionandfinalorderInaldocument.
it.Initialdecision, ledwithLheorigl-(e)Baton.(f)Ammunition/equipment belt.(g)Pager/duress alarms.7.Binoculars.
8.Nightvisionaids,I.e.,"handfiredllluml.nationflaresorequivalent.
9.Teargasorothernonlethal gas.Effective date:October23,1978.(Sec.161I,Pub.183-703,68Stat.948.Pub.L93-377,88Stat.475:Sec.201~Pub.L93-438,88Stat.1242-1243.
Pub.L94-79.89Stat.413(42US.C.2201,5841).)DatedatWashington, D.C.,this16thdayofAugust1978.FortheNuclearRegulatory Com-mission.SAMUELJ.CHILK,Secrcfar)/of fhgCommission.
[FRDoc.78-23605Flied8-22-'78; 8:45am1FEDERALREGISTERr VOI4'O'54IYEDNESDAYe AUGUST23'910 qqikUNITED~ESNUCLEARREGULARLY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.20555September 29,1978NOTETO:MartyMalschMarty:McGaheysaidIinhis,'l,etter
'thatheknewweweregoingtosaythatwedidnothaveauthority tostepintothisproblemarea;buthealsowentonthesaythatweshouldbeconcerned abouttheissue.Shouldn't weleavethedooropenabitforMcGaheytofeelfreetocomeinanddiscusstheproblemfurtherwithus?NiliamJ.DircksIII,II:gpypg+4Pjy+SVV4aft+octneo~clat<>)'0¹:tQyQIItY~~3 FROM:<<JII'1FM4+l)IIVIIJTO;ACTIONCONTROLCOMPLDEADLINEACKNOWLEDGMENT INTERIMREPLYFINALREPLYFILELOCATIONDATESO4555DATEOFDOCUMENTPREPAREFOSIGNATURE OF:QCHAIRMANPEXECUTIVE DIRECTOROTHER:DESCRIPTION QLETTERQMEMOQREPORTQOTHERE',!'iZ'7'"":."SC,id'.~'IQ~~
"(...;,;~7 I'=~<HIIV'i!V<"'.'<<J-g..Ifh.'>14<<MiMCl.,'<<IFk'>yg'~~Br) 4A44igP<<<<)w 5'a".><<lII4 4~~SPECIALINSTRUCTIONS ORREMARKSDOCUMENT/COPY NO.CLASSIFIED DATACLASSIFIGATI0NNUMBEROFPAGESPOSTALREGISTRYNO.ASSIGNEDTO:DATECATEGORYQNSIQRDQFRDINFORMATION ROUTINGLEGALREVIEWQFINALQCOPYg~gI'SSIGNED TO:DATENOLEGALOBJECTIONS NOTIFY:QEDOADMIN&CORRESBREXT.COMMENTS, NOTIFY:EXT.JCAENOTIFICATION RECOMMENDED:
GYES0NONRCFORM232I11-75IEXECUTIVE DIRECTORFOROPERATIONS "DONO7RE/IfOI/E 7HISCOPYPRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL J8-1353NRCSECRETARIATTO:CICommissioner XEtExec.Dir(OperCICong.LiaisonOPublicAffairsCILoggingDateDateCIGen.CounselCISolicitor QSecretary Incoming:
From:e0.GriffinUSSTQSubject...~5-7ldC.CooknuclearowerlantXK3Preparereplyforsign'ature of:CIChairmanCICommissioner X&EDO,GC,CL,SOL,PA,SECYCjSignature blockomittedDatedueSept.,29CIReturnoriginalofincomingwithresponseCjFordirectreplyClForappropriate actionCIForinformation CIForrecommendation Remarks:CsCo:D&SSOCACoAcknowled eNRC$2FortheCommission:
'Sendthree(3)copiesofreplytoSecyMailFacilityACTIONSLIP Respectfully referredtoCongressional LiaisonNuclearRegulatory Com.Pleasesendmeacopyofthereplytotheattachedletter.Thanks,RobertP.GriffinU.S.SenatorRPG:nfEormNo.3 0r~w~0~1v~4Ftl'(IIhCC7" JAMESC.McCAHEYIIICIIOINT FRANCISE.FITZPATRICK
~RCIIEYANV 71CAIUIIM TELEPHONE (3)3)772-7250~l'rSeptember 8,l978+...'-UIITEIjPIjIlTBURHDWOHKEHSOtHmEHIlH(UPBWH)International HeadquarIeis:
25510KellyRood,Roseville, Michigan48066k~c~,c.+~ISOT1+~Dr.Clifford'V.
SmithU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
DearDr.Smith:
Iwishtodirectyourattention toadeveloping situation attheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantinBridgman, Michigan.
ThedetailsoftheproblemaresetforthinaletterdatedAugust24,l978,totheU.S.Department ofEnergy,acopyofwhichisenclosed.
IntheeventthatR.R.S.Security, Inc.and/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanydonotretainthecurrentsecurityforceofcompetent andexperi-encedemployees, theconsequences setforthinmylettertotheDepart-mentofEnergywillberealized.
Itisinconceivable thatafederalregulatory agencyshoulddirectlyorindirectly foster,supportorcondoneanyactionwhichiscontraryto"federalpolicy"generally.
Iwouldliketoassumethatgovernment policiesintheareasoflaborrelations, fullemployment, equalrightsandothersarecoordinated amongthefederalagencies.
Itbegsthequestionforanyfederalagencytoassertthattheyhavenoauthority tocorrectapendingproblemand/ortoreferthatproblemtoanotheragency.Whetherornotafederalagencyhasspecificstatutory authority orjurisdiction inagivenarea,itisnonetheless inaposition'o institute remedialactionbythesheerapplication of"federalpolicy".Thetimehascome,andtheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantillustrates theproblem,forthefederalgovernment tobebothconcerned andinvolvedwhereprivatecompanies contravene variousfederalpolicieswhileoperating underfederalcontrolandapproval.
Unchecked biddingonfederally regulated projectshasnumerousadverseconsequences.
First,thereisunnecessary costtothetaxpayerintermsofnewsecurityclearances, recruitment andtrainingofemployees, unem-ploymentandwelfarecosts,andoverallfinancial losstoacommunity intaxandconsumerdollars.Second,thereisperiltothesecurityofafacilityinthatcontinuity ofoperations isbrokenandformeremployees whohaveanintimateknowledge ofthefacilitytendtoremaininthecommunity.
Third,thesituation isproductive oflaborunrestcontrarytothemandateoftheNationalLaborRelations Acttopromoteandpreserveindustrial stability.
And,finally,thelossandhardshipsufferedbyemployees andtheirfamiliesisincalculable.
~~~o/
r~C.~v=~~g
(~~,Dr.~CliffordV.Smith(NRC)Page-2-9-8-78TheproblemIhavedescribed isnotlimitedto'theCookNuclearPlantatBridgman, Michigan.
Itismushrooming throughout theCountry.Securityguardswhohavegivenmanyyearsofdedicated andcompetent servicetoafederally ownedand/orprivately ownedbutfederally regulated facilityaresuddenlyadvisedthattheiremployment isterminated.
Theyneitherinfluence norcontrolthatdecisionandarepowerless toreverseit.Theyaresimplyvictimsofabiddingsystemwhichvariousfederalagencieshave"failedtoregulateinthebestinterestofasecurityperformance, employeejobsecurityandtaxpayerwelfare.Onlythecontractor andsub-contractor benefitbysystemwhichabrogates collective bargaining agreements andemployeejob'security, andperpetuates sub-standard wagesandbenefits.
Itisnowonderthatguardagencyoperations aremarkedbyhighemployeeturnoverandreducedsecurityperformance.
Yetwhenemployees throughcollective actionraisetheirwages',benefits, andjobsecuritytoadecentlevel,theprincipal contractor reletsthebidtoanunorganized guardagency.Unfortunately, theServiceContractActandotherlegislation isnotadequatetocorrectthesituation.
Thereisbothacompelling needforspecificlegislation and,mostparticularly, foranewattitudeandmeansofcommunication andcooperation amongfederalregulatory agencies.
FormanyyearsourUnionhadsimilarproblemsatNASAfacilities throughout theCountry.InlargemeasuretheseproblemsweresolvedbytheServiceContractActandthecooperation ofNASAadministrators.
Suchaprogramandattitudeisnowurgentlyneededatbothfederally ownedandprivately owned,butfederally regulated, nuclearpowerplants.Thefutureofonehundredsecurityguardsandtheirfamiliesandthefortunesofasmallcommunity inWesternMichiganareatstakeinthismatter.Thesituation demandscorrective actionwhichcanbeoffutureapplication toemergingsituations atnuclearplantsthroughout theCountry.SOnbehalfoftheInternational Union(UPGWA),anditsmembersthroughOut theCountry,Iurgentlyrequestthatyougivethismatteryourimmediate attention.
Itisimperative thateveryconcerned legislator andagencyofficialcoordinate theireffortsandbecomeinvolvedtotheextentpossibletocorrecttheeverrecurring problemthathasnowarisenattheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.Verytrulyyours,SC.McHEY,Prstudentnternational Union-UPGWAJCM/gfopeiu42Encl.'c:President JimmyCarterSecretary ofLabor,F.RayMarshallSenatorHarrisonA.WilliamsCongressman FrankThompson, Jr.StuartBroad,Department ofEnergySEG-IRrTACh'~ptiStot-HL7DITZod+L-
~)IJIC UNITEDSTATESNUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.20555OFFICEOFNUCLEARMATERIALSAFETYANDSAFEGUARDS JAMESC.McGAHEYPR44IOCNTFRANCISE.FITZPATRICK 44CRCTART TRCA4URKR
'=-'...,..'='ll TEDPLHllTGUHHDWORHEHSOfHmEHGH(UPGWH)International Headquarters:
25510KellyRoad,Roseville, Michigan48066+0%>A>Ce~s0Fis~'ELEPHONE (313)772-7250~lTSeptember 8,l978Dr.CliffordV.Smith.U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
DearDr.Smith:
Iwishtodirectyourattention toadev'eloping situation atthe'onaldC.CookNuclearPlantinBridgman, Mich';gan.
Thedetailsoftheproblemareset.'orth inaletterdatedAugust24,l978,totheU.S.Department ofEnergy,acopyofwhi'ch'isenclosed.
IntheeventthatR.R.S.Sec'urity.,
Inc.and/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanydonotretainthe'urrent securityforceofcompetent andexperi-encedemployees, the'consequences'et forth'inmyletter'othe'Depart-ment,ofEnergywillbe'ea'lized.
It'isinconcei'vable
'thatafederalregulatory agencyshoulddirectlyorindirectly foster,support,orcondoneanyactionwhi'ch'iscontraryto"federalpolicy"gen'er'ally.
Iwouldliketoassumethat,government policies'n the'areasoflaborrelations, fullemploymen't, equalrightsandothersarecoordinated amongthefederalagencies.
Itbegsthequestionforanyfederalagencytoassertthattheyhavenoauthority tocortapendingprobl'emand/ortoreferthatproblemtoanotheragency.Whether'r notafederalagencyhasspecificstatutory authority orjurz.sictioninagivenarea,itisnonetheless inapositiontoinstitute remedialactionby'heshh'er'pplication of"federalpolicy".'he'ime hascome,andtheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantillustrates theproblem,,for'the
'federalgovernment toPeboth'cpncer'ned andinvolvedwhereprivate,companies contravene
'various'feder'al policieswhi'leoperating underfederalcontrolandapproval.
Unchecked biddingonfederally regulated projectshasnumerousadverseconsequences.
First,ther'e'isunnec'es'sary costtothe'taxpayer intermsofnewsecurityclea'rances',
recruitment andtrainingofemployees, unem-ploymentandwel'farecosts,andoverallfinancial losstoacommunity intaxandconsumerdollars.'econd, there'isperiltothesecurityofafacilityinthat.continuity ofoperations isbroken'nd former'mployees whohaveanintimatekn'owledge ofthefacilitytendtoremaininthecommunity.
Thi'rd,thesituation isproductive oflaborunrestcontrarytothemandateoftheNationalLaborRel'ations Acttopromoteandpreserveindustrial stability.
And,finally,the'lossandhardshipsufferedbyemployees andtheirfamiliesisincalculable.
~~~o/
'~~~~444Jkteg'4")Vf e~P'0I~~:Dr.CliffordV.Smith(NRC)Page-2;l9-8-7ghTheproblemIhavedesciibed isnotlimitedtotheCookNuclearPlantatBridgman, Michigan.
Itismushr'ooming thr'oughout theCountry.Securityguardswhohavegivenmanyyearsofdedicated andcompetent servicetoafederally ownedand/orprivately owned.but federally regulated facilityaresuddenlyadvisedthattheiremployment isterminated.
Theyneitherinfluence norcontrolthatdecisionandarepowerless toreverseit.They'aresimplyvictimsofabiddingsystemwh'ichvariousfederalagencieshavefailedtoregulateinthebestinterestof,asecurityperformance, employeejobsecurityandtaxpayerwelfare.Onlythecontractor andsub-contractor benefitbysystemwhi'chabrogates'ollec'tive bargaining agreements andemployeejobsecurity, andperpetuates sub-standard wagesandbenefits.
Itisnowonder'thatguardagencyoperations aremarkedbyhighemployeeturnoverandreduced.securityperformance.
Yetwhenemployees throughcollective actionraisetheirwages,benefits, andjobsecuritytoadecentlevel,theprincipal contractor reletsthebidtoanunorganized guardagency.Unfortunately, theServiceContractActandotherlegislation isnotadequatetocorrect,the'situation.
Ther'eisboth'acompelling needforspecificlegislation and,mostparticularly, foranew,attitudeandmeansofcommunication andcooperation amongfederalregulatory agencies.
FormanyyearsourUnion'adsimilarproblemsatNASAfacilities throughout theCountry.'InlargemeasuretheseproblemsweresolvedbytheServiceContractActandthecooperation ofNASAadministrators.
Suchaprogramandattitudeisnowurgentlyneededatboth'federally ownedandprivately owned,butfederally regulated, nuclearpowerplants.Thefutureofonehundredsecurityguardsandtheirfamiliesandthefortunesofasmallcommunity inWesternMichiganareatstakeinthismatter.Thesituation demandscorrective actionwhichcanbeoffutureapplication toemergingsituations atnuclearplantsthroughout theCountry.OnbehalfoftheInternational Union(UPGWA),andits.membersthrough5ut theCountry,Iurgentlyrecjuestthatyougivethismatteryourimmediate attention.
Itisimperative thateveryconcerned legislator andagencyofficialcoordinate theireffortsandbecomeinvolvedtotheextentpossibletocorrecttheeverrecurring problemthathas'nowarisenattheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.Verytrulyyours,SC.McHEY,Prstudentnternational Union-UPGWAJCM/gfopeiu42Encl.cc:President JimmyCarterSecretary ofLabor,'.RayMarshallSenatorHarrisonA.WilliamsCongressman FrankThompson, Jr.StuartBroad,Department ofEner'gy
~.~~I'II
'~gttUf/Pg~4ROANICR4 QoRSQOFOOR~O~+0+I>MI4+~Ispr%4~TELEPHONE (313)772-7250~l7International Headquarters:
25510KellyRoad,Roseville, Michigan480660JAMESC.McGAHEYIRCSIOCRTFRANCISE.FITZPATRICK SCCRCTART TRCASURCR August24,l978UllTEDPLHElTGUHRDWOHIItHSOfHmfflGH(UPGWH)Mr.StewartBroad,DirectorOfficeofContractor's Industrial Relations U.S.Department ofEnergyMailStationAl-4025washington, D.C.20545
DearMr.BroadsREtDONALDCDCOOKNUCLEARPLANTSRIDGMAN,
MICHIGANSinoetheinception oftheOonaldC.CookNuolearplantinBridgman,
- Michigan, securityservioeshavebeenprovidedbytheNaokenhut Corporation underaontraotwiththeIndianaMiohiganPowerCompany.XnJanuary1972,theXnternational Union,UnitedPlantGuardWorkersofAmerica(UPGWA)wascertified astheexclusive bargaining representative ofallguardsandsecurityofficers.
OurUnionhasenteredintosuccessive collective bax'gaining agreements withNackenhut, thelastofwhichwillnotexpixountilHay18,1979.Recently, theXndianaMichiganPowerCompanyletbidsforsecurityservices.
Itissignificant tonotethatthebidwasletapproximately sixweeksaftertheUP%%hadnegotiated increased wagesandbenefitsforsecurityoHVXcersunderawagereopenex.
ThebidwasawardedtoR.R.S.,Xncorpoxated ofSouthSend>Indiana,anon-union guardagency.'odatehasbeensetforR.R.S.totake-over securityservicesfromHackenhut.
OnAugust23,1978,Isentacertified lettextoR.R.S.requesting thatitretaintheseourityfox'ceandhonortheexistentcollective bargaining agreement.
Aoopyofthatlettex'senclosed.
Xamwritingtoenlistyoursupportinpreventing asituation atDonaldC.Cookwhichaouldbedetrimental toemployees andtheirfamilies, contrary-tofederallaborpolicy,inconsistent withnuclectrpowerplantsecurity, andcostlytothetaxpayer.
Whatrules,rogulahions andpoliciesdoestheDepartment ofEnergyhavetoregulatethetransferofsubaontracts andtopreventtheunfairanddiscriminatory dislocation ofemployees7 Itmustbepxesumedthatindividual employees ofMackenhut haveperfonnad effioiently andwell.Otherwise theywouldhavebeensub)ected topx'iordischarge ordiscipline.
Thustheentployoes shouldnotbepawnsinacontracting gameoverwhichtheyhavenovoiceorcontrol.~~~~I/
~~-'~p~~~g~~
f,hlr.StewartBroadU.S.Department ofEnergyPage-2-.8/24/78ShouldR.R.S.attempttoavoiditsobligation toincumbent employees andtheirchosenbargaining representative, severaladverseresultswilloccurasfollows:l.TheUPGWAwill,ofcourse,takeappropriate actionunderfederallaborlawtoprotecttheemployees andthecollec"tivebargaining agreement.
2.Displaced employees wouldjointheswellingranksoftheunemployed andtherefore increaseunemployment andwelfarecosts.'.Anynewemployees wouldhavetobesecurityclearedtrainedandotherwise processed atgreatandunnecessary expensetothetaxpayer.
4.Displaced employees wouldremaininthesmallcommunity ofBridgmanandtherefore poseanadditional andunnecessary problemtositesecurity.
Iunderstand thatthereisacurrentconcernwithnighemployeeturnoverandthethreatitposestosecurity.
5.Xtisimpossible tomeasurethehumanmiseryandhardshipcausedtoincumbent employees, theirfamilies, andthecommunity.
Thisisanurgent.problemwhichItrustwillreceivetheimmediate atten-tionoftheDepartment ofEnergy.Xtisinconceivable thattheU.S.Government wouldstandidlybywhilefederalpolicyisviolatedatafederally regulated nuclearsite.By"federalpolicy"Ihavereference tofullemployment, savingcosts,encouraging stability inlaborrelations, preventing age,sex,raceandhandicapdiscrimination, andahostofotQers.'he problematDonaldC.Cookepitomizes theoftenadverseconsequences ofunregulated biddingforfederalservices.
NayIpleasehearfromyouimmediately.
Sincerely yours,JCH/gfopeiu42Encl.cc:Indianal~lichigan PowerCompanyThettlackenhut Corporation henryE.ApplenCharlesE.LambGordonGregoryJAMESC.McGAHEY,President International UnionU.P.G.N.A.
1t~aI'
.,'R60TIIb PdtlPTRANSMITTAL RLTO:(me,'office symbol,roomnumber,building, ilgency/Post) 1.InitialsDate,lonrovalRequested ircuiateommantCoordination FileForClearance ForCorrection ForYourInformation Investigate dustlNoteandReturnPerConversation PrepareReplySeeMeSignature REMARKSyy"E(5'gygl~J<<t<<~8>i/Z~~~ri~4-~
~~~rs~~H~~5'~~r~~
~pepep+gwP9c~iui(j/~~p~/~/Jun$DOPVOFust35orm4RECORDofapprovals, concurrences, disposals, clearances, andsimilaractionsFROM:(Name,org.symbolcst)RoomNo.-Bldg.PhoneNo.5041-102*GpoIlOTT0233330(3450)OPnONAI.FORM41(Rev.7-76)Preecrlbed bvGSAFPMR(41CFR)101-11.206 ROUTINGARD'RANSMITTAL SUPDateTO:(Name,oNcesymbol,roomnumber,building, Agency/Post)
InitialsDateReuestedircuiatemmentCoordination FileForClearance ForCorrection ForYourinformation Investigate NoteandReturnPerConversation PrepareRepSeeMeSignature pl-&p~~DONOTusethisformasaRECORDofapprovals, cncurrences, disposals, clearances, andsimilaractionsFROM:(Name,org.symbol,Agency/Post)
RoomNo.-Bldg.PhoneNo.SOll-1024U.S.ON:10774-241 590/2228OPTIONALFORM41(Rev.7-76)Prescribed bvGSAFPMR(hlCFRI101-11.206 4I~SORTINGANDTRANSMITTAL SUP"~,~TO:(Name,oflicesymbol,roomnumber>building, Agency/Post) 1.'<//71///d'/'nitialsDateonrovalReuestedircuiatemmentCoordination FileForClearance ForCorrection ForYourInformation investigate JustlNoteandReturnPerConversation PrepareReSeeMeSgnature+~~JiZy~c~Z<~g,~/~He,q~8DONOTusethisformasaRECORDofapprovals, concurrences, dlsposals, clearances, andsimilaractionsFROM:Ne,org.symI,ency/Post)
.Roe~No-Bldg.$8Phoneo.g72-5041-1020U.S"G.P.O.1977-241-530/3090 OPTiONALFORM41(Rev.7-76)Prescribed byGSAFPMR(41CFR)101<<11~
~4'NFMOROUTESLIPFormERDh-93(1-75)ERDhM0240Seemeaboutthis.Noteandreturn.Forconcurronc Forsfanature.
ForactionForInlormatlon.
.$0(Nemoandunit)"Dr.CliffordV.SmitDirector, Ofc.ofNuclearMaterials Safety8Safeguard TO(Nemoandunit)IHITIALS,NRCIRITIALSRESIARKSTO(Nameandunit)IKITIALSFRONameanItuaro,DsOfc.ofContractor
.Industrial RelatioDOEPHONEHO..DATE353-50848/30/78USEOTHERSIDEFORADDITIONAL RES)ARKSAAU~6.6~P~0~I9777E6666174ERENARKSIamforwardin theattachedsinceyourofficemighthaveaninterestinthesecurityaspectsofthiscomplaint.
Attachment:
Ltrto,BroadfmMcGahey,UPGMA,dt88,wnc
~Vi~'4~~r'iDepartment ofEnergyWashington, D.C.20545g,UGgo3978Mr.JamesC.McGahey,President UnitedPlantGuardWorkersofAmerica(UPGWA)25510KellyRoadRoseville, Michigan48066
DearMr.McGahey:
Iamresponding toyourletterofAugust24,1978,regarding certainguardunionproblemsattheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantinBridgman, Michigan.
Regretably, thisofficeisunabletorespondtoyourrequestsincetheDepartment ofEnergydoesnothaveindustrial relations responsibility atcommercial nuclearpowerplants.Inote,however,thatyouhaveindicated concernsregarding securityatthisplant.Accordingly, Ihaveforwarded yourlettertotheNuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC).IamsurethatNRCwillreviewthesecurityconcernsoutlinedinyourletter.Sincerely, gg(Stuart8~~4StuartBroadDirector, OfficeofContractor ndustrial Relations
'c:Dr.CliffordY.Smith,NRC
'~~I,PNllgi)f~ORDANIZRa o1$4$$e~doliMIDc~+fItgPPgL~+TELEPHONE (313)772-7250~ITinternational Headquarters:
25510KellyRoad,Roseville, Michigan48066JAMESC,McGAHEYPRESIDENT FRANC(SE.FIT?PATRtCK SCCRCTARY TRCARURCR August24,1978URTEDPLHRTGUHRDWOHHEHSOfHNEHCH(UPGWH)Mr.StewartBroad,DirectorOfficeofContractor's Industrial Relations U.S.Department ofEnergyMailStationAl-4025Washington, D.C.20545
DearMr.Broad:
RE:DONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTBRIDGMAN, MICHIGANSincetheinception oftheDonaldC.CookNuclearplantinBridgman,
- Michigan, securityserviceshavebeenprovidedbytheWackenhut.
Corporation undercontractwiththeIndianaMichiganPowerCompany.InJanuary1972,theInternational Union,UnitedPlantGuardWorkersofAmerica{UPGWA)wascertified astheexclusive bargaining representative ofall-guards andsecurityofficers.
OurUnionhasenteredintosuccessive collective bargaining agreements withWackenhut, thelast.ofwhich'willnotexpireuntilMay18,1979.Recently, theIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyletbidsforsecurityservices.
Itissignificant tonotethatthebidwasletapproximately sixweeksafterthe'UPGWAhadnegotiated increa'sed wagesandbenefitsforsecurityofficersunderawagereopener.
ThebidwasawardedtoR.R.S.,Incorporated ofSouthBend,Indiana,anon-union guardagency.NodatehasbeensetforR.R.S.totake-over securityservicesfromWackenhut.
OnAugust23,1978,Isentacertified lettertoR.R.S.requesting thatitretainthesecurityforceandhonortheexistentcollective bargaining agreement.
Acopyofthatletterisenclosed.
Iamwritingtoenlistyoursupportinpreventing asituation atDonaldC.Cookwhich'couldbedetrimental toemployees andtheirfamilies,-
contrarytofederallaborpolicy,inconsistent with'nuclearpowerplantsecurity, andcostlytothetaxpayer.
Whatrules,regulations andpoliciesdoestheDepartment ofEnergyhavetoregulatethe'ransfer ofsubcontracts andtopreventtheunfairanddiscriminatory dislocation ofemployees?
Itmustbepresumedthatindividual employees ofWackenhut have.per'formed efficiently andwell.Othe'rwise
'theywouldhavebeensubjected topriordischarge ordiscipline.
Thustheemployees shouldnotbepawnsinacontracting gameoverwhichtheyhavenovoiceorcontrol.6129~~~~o/
Mr.StewartBroadU.S.Department ofEnergyPage'-2-.8/24/78-Sho'uldR.R.S.attempttoavoiditsobligation toincunbent employee's andtheirchosenbargaining representative, severaladverseresultswilloccurasfollows:.
1.TheUPGNAwill,ofcourse,takeappropriate actionunderfederallaborlawtoprotect,theemployees'nd the'ollec-tivebargaining agreement.
2..Displaced employees wouldjointheswellingranksofthe.unemployed andtherefore
'increase
'unemployment andwel'farecosts'~'.Anynew.employees wouldhave'tobe'security clearedtrainedandotherwise proces'sed at.'great andunn'eces'sary expen'se'tothetaxpayer.
4.Displaced employees wouldremaininthesmallcommunity ofBridgman'and therefore "pose-'an additional andunnec'essary problemtosite'security.
Iunder'stand thatthere'isacurrentconcernwith'highemployee'turnover andthethreatitposes'osec'urity.
S.Itis-impossible tomea'surethehumanmiseryandhardshipcausedtoincumbent employees,'heir families',
andthecommunity.
Thisisanurgentproblemwhich.I'trustwill.receivethe'mmediate
'atten-tionoftheDepartment, ofEnergy..Itisinconceivable that,the'U.S.Government wouldstandidlybywhilefederalpolicyisviolatedatafederally regulated nuclearsite.By"federalpolicy"Ihave'referen'ce tofullemployment, savingcosts,*encouraging stability inlaborrel'ations,.
preventing age,sex,'ace'andnandicapdisciimination, andaheistofothers.TheproblematDonaldC.Cookepitomizes theoften adverseconsequences ofunregulated biddingforfederalser'vices.'ay Ipleasehea'rfromyouimmediatel'y.
Si:ncerely yours,JCM/gfopeiu42.Encl.cc:IndianaMichi:gan PowerCompanyTheElackenhut Corporation HenryE.Applen'harles E.LambGordonGregoryKSC.NcGAHEY,,
Prsidentnternational Union'.PE G.NA.
(14+)'I~(~bo4IIIINcOFOANCEDPS%.1'7p114~4C700Og'>M~gC~a+~Isorla~FELEPHON6 (313)772-7250~<vJAMESC.McGAHEYIIACOIDCNZ CERTIFIED MAILFRANCISE.FITZPATRICK RETURNRECEIPTREQUESTED IKCIIKTAIIY TACAIUAKII August23,1978rQ.gP)j7%URTtDPLHRTBUHHDWOHtIfHSOfHIMCH(UPBWH)0'nternational KeodquorIers:
25510KellyRoad,Roseville, Michigan48066Mr.DonaldQuad,AreaManagerR.R.S.,Incorporated 403DixieWayNorthSouthBend,Indiana46637
DearMr.Quad:
lthasbeenbroughttotheattention ofthisInternational UnionthatyourCompanyisthesuccessful biddertoprovidesecurityservicesattheDonaldC.CookNuclearPowerSiteinBridgman, Michigan.
ThisInternational, anditsAmalgamated LocalNo.37,hasbeentheexclusive bargaining agentforallPatrolmen andSergeants atthatsitesince1972.Currently, thereisaLaborAgreement ineffectbetweentheWackenhut Corporation andtheInternational Union,UnitedPlantGuardWorkersofAmerica(UPGWA)anditsAmalgamated LocalNo.37.ThatAgreement expiresat0700hoursonMay1S,1979.PleaseacceptthisletterasourrequestforameetingwithyourCompanyforthepurposeofworkingoutasmoothtransition where-inyourCompanyacceptstheemployees andtheContractnowineffect.TheUnioniswillingtomakemodifications suchasthechangeintheCompany's nameandinotherareasifnot-applicable toyourCompany.Werequestyourimmediate replybecausewefeelthatthistransi-tionisofaseriousnature;anditisimportant thatwegetitresolvedasearlyaspossible.
Verytrulyyours,JAMEC.McGAHEYPresident International UnionU.P.G.W.A.
JCM/esbopeiu42cc:JamesSix,R.R.S.,Inc.WilliamStewart,President, Local37-UPGWACharlesE.Lamb,Director, Region2-UPGWA 04hC.r~t/
)ffzp~~~o<
DQSetember15~J978Respectfully referredtoCongressional LiaisonNuclearRegulatory Com..Pleasesendmeacopyofthereplytotheattachedletter.Thanks,RobertP.GriffinU.S.SenatorRPG:nfFOtZZ1ilOo3 f"i')IIrrrjffPgass1Vp1StdfC7~P~lesOFTEi.EF'.ONE(313)772-7250~l7lntornarional Headciuorrvra:
25510lc:allyRoad,Roseville, Michigan48065JAMESC.McGAHEYI'IICIIOINr September 8,1978FRANCISE.FITZPATRICK ICCIIC'rANV.VIICAIVIISA UllTELflllTBUflHDNOHHEOtflftlEHGfl CUPBNH)Dr.Clifford'.SmithU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Nashington, D.C.20555cr.ggoc~gzao~y$0~0
DearDr.Smith:
4$Iwishtodirectyourattention toadeveloping situation attheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantinBridgman, Michigan.
Thedetailsofthe~problemaresetforthinaletterdatedAugust24,1978,totheU.S.Department ofEnergy,acopyofwhichisenclosed.
IntheeventthatR.R.S.Security, Inc.and/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanydonot,retainthecurrentsecurityforceofcompetent andexperi-encedemployees, theconsequences setforthinmylettertotheDepart-mentofEnergywillberealized.
Xtisinconceivable thatafederalregulatory agencyshoulddirectlyorindirectly foster,supportorcondoneanyactionwhichiscontraryto"federalpolicy"generally.
Iwouldliketoassumethatgovernment policiesintheareasoflaborrelations, fullemployment, equalrightsandothersarecoordinated amongthefederalagencies.
Itbegsthequestionforanyfederalagencytoassertthattheyhavenoauthority tocorrectapendingproblemand/ortoreferthatproblemtoanotheragency.whetherornotafederalagencyhasspecificstatutory authority orjurisdiction inagivenarea,itisnonetheless inapositiontoinstitute remedialactionbythesheerapplication of"federalpolicy".Thetimehascome,andtheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantillustrates theproblem,forthefederalgovernment tobebothconcerned andinvolvedwhereprivatecompanies contravene variousfederalpolicieswhileoperatinunderfederalcontrolandapproval.
Unchecked biddingonfederally regulated projectshasnumerousadverseconsequences.
First,thereisunnecessary costtothetaxpayerintermsofnewsecurityclearances, recruitment andtrainingofemployees, unem-ploymentandwelfarecosts,andoverallfinancial losstoacommunity intaxandconsumerdollars.Second,thereisperiltothesecurityofafacilityinthatcontinuity ofoperations isbrokenandformeremployees whohaveanintimateknowledge ofthefacilitytendtoremaininthecommunity.
Third,thesituation isproductive oflaborunrestcontrarytothemandateoftheNationalLaborRelations Acttopromoteandpreservindustrial stability.
And,finally,thelossandhardshipsufferedbyemployees andtheirfamiliesisincalculable.
Dr.CliffordV.SmithNRC)Page-2-9-&-7&TheproblemIhavedescribed isnotlimitedtotheCookNuclearPlantatBridgman, Michigan.
Itismushrooming throughout theCountry.Securityguardswhohavegivenmanyyearsofdedicated andcompetent servicetoafederally ownedand/orprivately ownedbutfederally regulated facilityaresuddenlyadvisedthattheiremployment isterminated.
Theyneitherinfluence norcontrolthatdecisionandarepowerless toreverseit.Theyaresimplyvictimsofabiddingsystemwhichvariousfederalagencieshave"failedtoregulateinthebestinterestofasecurityperformance, employeejobsecurityandtaxpayerwelfare.Onlythecontractor andsub-contractor benefitbysystemwhichabrogates collective bargaining agreements andempl,oyee job'security, andperpetuates sub-standard wagesandbenefits.
Itisnowonderthatguardagencyoperations aremarkedbyhighemployeeturnoverandreducedsecurityperformance.
Yetwhenemployees throughcollective actionraisetheirwages,benefits, andjobsecuritytoadecentlevel,theprincipal contractor reletsthebidtoanunorganized guardagency.Unfortunately, theServiceContractActandotherlegislation isnotadequatetocorrectthesituation.
Thereisbothacompelling needforspecificlegislation and,mostparticularly, foranewattitudeandmeansofcommunication andcooperation amongfederalregulatory agencies.
Fox'anyyearsourUnionhadsimilarproblemsatNASAfacilities throughout theCountry.InlargemeasuretheseproblemsweresolvedbytheServiceContractActandthecooperation ofNASAadministrators.
Suchaprogramandattitudeisnowurgentlyneededatbothfederally ownedandprivately owned,butfederally regulated, nuclearpowerplants.Thefutureofonehundredsecurityguaxdsandtheirfamiliesandthefortunesofasmallcommunity inWesternMichiganareatstakeinthismatter.Thesituation demandscorrective actionwhichcanbeoffutureapplication toemergingsituations atnuclearplantsthroughout theCountry.OnbehalfoftheInternational Union(UPGWA),anditsmembersthroughdut theCountry,Iurgentlyrequestthatyougivethismatteryourimmediate attention.
Itisimperative thatevery"concerned legislator andagencyofficialcoordinate theireffortsandbecomeinvolvedtotheextentpossibletocorrecttheeverrecurring problemthathasnowarisenattheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.Verytrulyyours,SC.McHEY,Prstudentntexnational Union-UPGWAJCM/gfopeiu42Encl.cc:President JimmyCarterSecretary ofLabor,F.RayMarshallSenatorHarrisonA.WilliamsCongressman FrankThompson, Jr.StuartBroad,Department ofEnergySEE-RT~aeHapLis(gt-]qgg)yTyada(-
~o(+~+>*
June14,1976TheHonorable EdwardHutchinson UnitedStatesHouseofRepresentatives Washington, D.C.20515DearCongressman Hutchinson:
ThisisinresponsetoyourletterofMay21,1976totheNRCOfficeofCongressional Affairsrequesting areplytovariousconcernsofyourconstituent, MissMitziJohnston.
MissJohnstonraisesseveralquestions relatedtothesafeoperation ofnuclearpowerplants,andthesewillbediscussed below.Someofherquestions are,asyouknow,addressed directlytoyou,andwewilltrytoprovidesomebackground onthesubjectsinvolved, whereappropriate.
ThoughitisnotMissJohnston's firstquestion, itseemsbesttobeginbyidentifying NRC.TheNuclearRegulatory Conmission cameintobeingbyenactment of-theEnergyReorganization Actof1974andbeganofficialoperation onJanuary19,1975.Priortothattime,theAtomicEnergyCommission wasresponsible forbothdevelopmental andregulatory activities associated withnuclearenergy,including powerplants,underthe-Atomic EnergyActof1954.TheAECwasdissolved bytheEnergyReorganization Actof1974whichplaceditsregulatory functions undertheNRCanditsdevelopmental functions undertheEnergyResearchandDevelopment Administration.
TheNRCisalsogovernedbyprovisions oftheNationalEnvironmental PolicyActof1969.Assetforthinthesestatutes, theprimarymissionoftheNRCistoassurethatciviliannuclearactivities areconducted inamannerwhichwillprotect-public healthandsafety,nationalsecurityandenvironmental quality.Thisisdonethroughasystemoflicensing andregulation whichinvolvesstandards setting,safetyreviewsandstudies,inspection oflicensedoperation andenforcement ofNRCrules,andconfirmatory researchtoverifytheadequacyofregulations andrevealanyneedtoaugment,replaceorimprovethem.Iamenclosing forMissJohnston's information acopyofNRC's1975AnnualReportwhichcontainsacomprehensive presentation ofthisagency'sfunctions andcurrentactivities inregulating nuclearenergyuses,.including nuclearpowerplants,onbehalfofthepublic..OFFICE~SURNAME~DATA~POnahEC.318(RST.9.$3)AECM02400U,1,OOVERHMENT RRINTIHO01PIPICEI IOTAS21I11 4~"7~Ir'4I4444,v4gsgsl'I4Cf~'1ICP'I7Il4~4'c(1('CIPEtl~444If)[44441-g44=44474IsEtIvI4CllII'4ffttl\444I'fs14E-444II74~,II4tllEgg*47-~4O'EE~st~~'44~7I~IP4IPIIPWII4~-4'I4~4414l~~*~Cv.pCf4~14Ir4t4ICI'4'l4'I4Il44.44I4-IIvIffIC4~I~Igvtf'4'4<<74~=~7I4I7r.>>4 TheKonorable EdwardKutchinson Theparticular incidenttowhichtlissJohnstonreferswasaminoreventthatoccurredattheDonaldC.CooknuclearfacilityinBerrienCounty,Michigan.
Thefacilityconsistsoftwoseparatereactorunits,oneinoperation andtheotherunderconstruction.
Onthy10,1976.aslightincreaseabovevt;he verylowlevelofradioactivity normallypresentintheairwasdetectedintheauxiliary buildingforthefacility.
'hisbuildingisseparatefromthereactorcontainment buildings andhousessuchapparatus aswater-treatment systems,electrical systems,andthe"Emergency CoreCoolingSystem"(aback-upsystemtosupplycoolingwaterintheeventoflossofthenormalreactorcoolant).
Thecauseoftheriseinradioactivity wasleakagefromavalvewhichhadnotbeencompletely closedfollowing ascheduled shutdownofthereactorforroutineinspection andmaintenance.
Theofficials atthe,plantthoughtitprudenttoevacuatetheauxiliary buildingatonce,duetotlieincreaseinthelevelofairborneradioactivity.
Construction workersfnthereactorbuildingunderconstruction heardthepublic-address announcement intendedtoapplyonlytothoseintheauxiliary building.
Theworkersevacuated thereactorbuilding, someofthemleavingthegobsiteentirely.
Itwasthataction,apparently.
thatattracted mediaattention andledtothenewspaper itemcitedbyMissJohnston.
Plantpersonnel wereabletoentertheauxiliary buildingrightaway,withprotective
- clothing, andthesituation wasresolvedinamatterofafewhours.Nopersonnel exposureinexcessofregulatory limitsresultedfromtheincreaseinairborneradioactivity, andnooff-sitereleaseofradioactivity inexcessofregulatory limitsoccurred.
Thus,theincidentwasnotofthetypethatmustbereportedtotheNRC.Nevertheless, becauseofpublicinterestevokedbythemediacoverage, NRCwasnotified.
OnHay11,thenextday,an-NRCinspector andan5RCradiation protection specialist visitedtheauxiliary buildingandconfirmed thatconditions werenormalandthattherehadbeennodangertothepublic.Plantofficials havetakenstepstoassurethatallvalveswillbesecuredandcheckedaftermaintenance andtoimprovecommunication withtheconstruction crewsatworkonthenewunit.Yourconstituent askswhatistopreventanoccurrence ofgreaterconsequence, ifthesekindsofincidents areallowedtooccur.Itis-anunderstandable andvalidquestion, ofcourse,thoughIwouldpointoutagainthat%hisparticular occurrence wasactuallyofnoconsequence tosafetyandthelicenseewouldhavelikedtopreventitonthebasisofeconomicoperation alone.TheNRC'sprimaryconcernisprotection ofpublichealthandsafetyagainstseriousaccidents, anda"defnse-in-depth" coceptisrequiredandemployedintheOFFICE~4URHAM49P'ATEN'orm ABC-518(ReT.9.55)hZCM0240QU,4,oovL'RHMCNT PRINTINPSPTIc2IIPTA424144WwJ~'a
'ha TheHonorable EdwardHutchinson design,construction andoperation ofeachnuclearplant.Thisinvolvesthreesuccessive andmutuallyreinforcing echelonsofdefense.Thefirstemphasizes accidentprevention byrequiring soundandconservative designinaccordwithstringent qualitystandards andengineering practices, withahighdegreeoffreedomfromfaultsanderrors.Thesecondechelonofdefense-andthisisperhapsmostpe~tinent toMissJohnston's concern--assumesthatfailuresoroperating errorsthatpotentially couldleadtosafetyproblemswilloccurduringtheservicelifeofanuclearpowerplantdespiteallthecaretakentopreventthem.Accordingly, NRCrequirestheprovision ofredundant safetysystemstodetectoff-normal conditions andpreventescalation ofminorincidents intomajorones.Thethirdechelonofdefensesupplements thefirsttwothroughfeaturesthatprovideadditional marginsofsafetytoprotectthepublicagainstunlikelyaccidents.
Yourconstituent willfinddetaileddescriptions oftheNRC'ssafetymeasuresconcerning powerreactorsinChapter2oftheenclosedAnnualReport.SincetheNRC'sfunctions relateprimarily toprotection ofpublichealthandsafety,nationalsecurityandenvironmental quality,wecanofferonlygeneralcommentconcerning HissJohnston's questions aboutthefutureofnuclearpowerandthecostofnuclearplants.TheEnergyResearchandDevelopment Administration, whibIIischargedwithdeveloping allpromising modesofenergytomeetnationalneeds.hasidentified coalandnuclearenergyasthemostrealistic alternatives tooilamongenergysourcespresently available andtechnically usable.Nuclearenergyalsoisprominent inrecentforecasts oftheFederalEnergyAdministration forthenexttwodecades.Detailsastotheexpenditure ofpublicfundsondevelopment ofnuclearplantsandfore-castsforallformsofenergycanbeobtainedfromthesetwoagencies.
Construction ofnuclearpowerplantshas,ofcourse,requiredbillionsofdollarsofinvestment byelectricutilities.
Nevertheless, theirchoicesofgenerating sourceshavebeendictatedbyeconomics, andtheyhaveindicated thathighcapitalcostshavebeenoffsetbysavingsinnuclearfuelcosts.Noreinformation onfactorsinfluencing thisprivateinvestment maybeobtainedfromtheEdisonElectricInstitute, 90ParkAvenue,NewYork,NewYork10016.Inconclusion, IwouldnotethattheNRCneitherpromotesnoropposesnuclearpowerperse,andthatwesharetheconcernoftheCongress, otherFederalagenciesandthevastmajorityofscientists andengineers OhhICEWSUhHAMSWDATE&PdrfdAPA:-318(RST.'955)hECM02404U.S,OOVSSHMSNT PhlNTINCOFTICSIIS74~S2d1dd IR'IJII~RIa~*k.>>>>V'(~IIIRt1I'I~k-3IHI'IR'(>'I1VV-3tH\IPkill'RQ)tRkILI~~R'<<e-I'V~>~IIRf=-~'3~4<<IVk~IJ-V'ilk.>>>ARIRg~-I~'!IC~~~'V(likVEII>>.>~ke>VV'"~k'c~'>>CI>lhk~I>1ljIVIR4~I>>3II-~IYgky<<VCRIll>'vI'IeC>~'RilIk>IIIk<~'I>>-',~,'I3(4.'evt141ARI~I~~~>P"IIIRAHll-$t,'k~I*~II,hR4IPRRRfk>>"S,'RRlRI3IRe>>a>'I%>TQIRt<<EVRI1~~
TheHonorable EdwardHutchinson thatmembersofthepublic,suchasMissJohnston, begiventhemostcomprehensive andaccurateinformation available astheymaketheirjudgments concerning thefutureofnuclearenergy.Sincerely.
Willi"rnJ,Dircksesistant;:ncutivo Direcfcgf forGpeLations
Enclosure:
NRC's1975AnnualReportDISTRIBUTION W.J,Naher,EDO:SPBl<lG.Dooly,EDO:SPBJ.H.Cook,EDO:SPBEDOReadingFile(00428)E.Volgenau, IEB.Marnjck,IECA(3)EdwardL.Jordan,IE,RegionIII799Roosevelt RoadGlenEllyn,Illinois60137DocketFiles(50-315and50-316)PDR',"':(50:315"and 50-316)LocalPDR,,'('50-315.'an'd 50-316$OPPICC9P'IIIINAMC9P'A'rc9P'DQSPELD~)...MGD...............
-~..6//76EDO:SPB'NMaher.'..:.Pmk 6/7/766Pi/76FormAEC-91$(Rex.9.55)hXCM02404V,4,OOVCIINMCNC PAINTINOOPPICCII474424l44 IIILLA'a gp,RAEONSc"ai.C)In(O~tp0Q~viice+yqP++*++UNITEDSTATESCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.20555JUN141976TheHonorable EdwardHutchinson UnitedStatesHouseofRepresentatives Mashington, D.C.20515Dear'ongressman Hutchinson; ThisisinresponsetoyourletterofMay21,1976totheNRCOfficeofCongressional Affairsrequesting areplytovariousconcernsofyourconstituent, MissMitziJohnston.
Miss'ohnston raisesseveralquestions relatedtothesafeoperation ofnuclearpowerplants,andthesewillbediscussed below.Someofherquestions are,asyouknow,addressed directlytoyou,andwewilltrytoprovidesomebackground onthesubjectsinvolved, whereappropriate.
ThoughitisnotMissJohnstonsfirstquestion, itseemsbesttobeginbyidentifying NRC.TheNuclearRegulatory COIImrission cameintobeingbyenactment oftheEnergyReorganization Actof1974andbeganofficialoperation onJanuary19,1975.Priortothattime,theAtomicEnergyCommission wasresponsible forbothdevelopmental andregulatory activities associated withnuclearenergy,including powerplants,undertheAtomicEnergyActof1954.TheAECwasdissolved bytheEnergyReorganization Actof1974whichplaceditsregulatory functions unde'rtheNRCanditsdevelopmental functions under,theEnergyResearchandDevelopment Administration.
TheNRCisalsogovernedbyprovisions oftheNationalEnvironmental PolicyActof1969.Assetforthinthesestatutes, theprimarymissionoftheNRCistoassurethatcivilian-nuclearactivities areconducted inamannerwhichwillprotectpublichealthandsafety,nationalsecurityandenvironmental quality.Thisisdonethroughasystemoflicensing andregulation whichinvolvesstandards setting,safetyreviewsandstudies,inspection oflicensedoperation and.enforcement ofNRCrules,andconfirmatory researchtoverifytheadequacyofregulations andrevealanyneedtoaugment,replaceorimprovethem.Iamenclosing forMissJohnston's information acopyofNRC's1975AnnualReportwhichcontainsacomprehensive presentation ofthisagency'sfunctions andcurrentactivities inregulating nuclearenergyuses,including nuclearpowerplants,onbehalfofthepublic.
1\TheHonorable EdwardHutchinson e,Theparticular incidenttowhichMiss'Johnston referswasaminoreventthatoccurredattheDonaldC.CooknuclearfacilityinBerrienCounty,Michigan.
Thefacilityconsistsoftwoseparatereactorunits,oneinoperation andtheotherunderconstruction.
OnMay10,1976,aslightincreaseabovetheverylowlevelofradioactivity normallypresentintheairwasdetectedintheauxiliary buildingforthefacility.
Thisbuildingisseparatefromthereactorcontainment buildings andhousessuchapparatus aswater-treatment systems,electrical systems,andthe"Emergency CoreCoolingSystem"(aback-upsystemtosupplycoolingwaterintheeventoflossofthenormalreactorcoolant).
Thecauseoftheriseinradioactivity wasleakagefromavalvewhichhadnotbeencompletely closedfollowing ascheduled shutdownofthereactorforroutinereinspection andmaintenance.
Theofficials attheplantthoughtitprudenttoevacuatetheauxiliary buildingatonce,duetotheincreaseinthelevelofairborneradioactivity..
Construction workersinthereactorbuildingunderconstruction heardthepublic-address announcement intendedtoapplyonlytothoseintheauxiliary building.
Theworkersevacuated thereactorbuilding, someofthemleavingthejobsiteentirely.
Itwasthataction,apparently, thatattracted mediaattention andledto.thenewspaper itemcitedbyMissJohnston.
Plantpersonnel wereabletoentertheauxiliary buildingrightaway,withprotective
- clothing, andthesituation wasresolvedinamatterofa'fewhours.Nopersonnel exposure"inexcessofregulatory limitsresultedfromtheincreaseinairborne.
radioactivity, andnooff-sitereleaseofradioactivity inexcessofregulatory limitsoccurred.
Thus,theincidentwasnotofthetypethatmustbereportedtotheNRC.Nevertheless, becauseofpublicinterestevokedbythemediacoverage, NRCwasnotified.
OnMayll,thenextday,anNRCinspector andanNRCradiation protection specialist visitedtheauxiliary buildingandconfirmed thatconditions werenormalandthattherehadbeennodangertothepublic.Plantofficials havetakenstepstoassurethatallvalveswillbesecuredandcheckedaftermaintenance andtoimprovecommunication withtheconstruction crewsatworkonthenewunit.Yourconstituent askswhatistopreventanoccurrence ofgreaterconsequence, ifthesekindsofincidents areallowedtooccur.Itisanunderstandable andvalidquestion, ofcourse,thoughIwouldpointoutagainthatthisparticular occurrence wasactuallyofnoconsequence tosafetyandthelicenseewouldhavelikedtopreventitonthebasisofeconomicoperation alone.TheNRC'sprimaryconcernisprotection ofpublichealthandsafetyagainstseriousaccidents, anda"defense-in-depth" conceptisrequiredandemployedinthe 0TheHonorable EdwardHutchinson
-3'-design,construction andoperation of"eachnuclearplant.Thisinvolvesthreesuccessive andmutuallyreinforcing echelonsofdefense.Thefirstemphasizes accidentprevention byrequiring soundandconservative designinaccordwithstringent qualitystandards andengineering practices, withahighdegreeoffreedomfromfaultsanderrors.Thesecondechelonofdefense--andthisisperhapsmostpertinent toHissJohnston's concern--assumesthatfailuresoroperating errorsthatpotentially couldleadtosafetyproblemswilloccurduringtheservicelifeofanuclearpowerplantdespiteallthecaretakentopreventthem.Accordingly, NRCrequirestheprovision ofredundant safetysystemstodetectoff-normal conditions andpreventescalation ofminorincidents intomajorones.Thethirdechelonofdefensesupplements thefirsttwothroughfeaturesthatprovideadditional marginsofsafetytoprotectthepublicagainstunlikelyaccidents.
Yourconstituent willfinddetaileddescriptions oftheNRC'ssafetymeasuresconcerning powerreactorsinChapter2oftheenclosedAnnualReport.SincetheNRC'sfunctions relateprimarily toprotection ofpublichealthandsafety,nationalsecurityandenvironmental quality,wecanofferonlygeneralcommentconcerning HissJohnston's questions aboutthefutureofnuclearpowerandthecostofnuclearplants.TheEnergyResearchandDevelopment Administration, whichischargedwithdeveloping allpromising modesofenergytomeetnationalneeds,hasidentified coalandnuclearenergyasthemostrealistic alternatives tooilamongenergysourcespresently available andtechnically usable.Nuclearenergyalsoisprominent inrecentforecasts oftheFederalEnergyAdministration forthenexttwodecades.Detailsastotheexpenditure ofpublicfundsondevelopment ofnuclearplantsandfore-castsforallformsofenergycanbeobtainedfromthesetwoagencies.
Construction ofnuclearpowerplantshas,ofcourse,requiredbillionsofdollarsofinvestment byelectricutilities.Nevertheless, theirchoicesofgenerating sourceshavebeendictatedbyeconomics, andtheyhaveindicated thathighcapitalcostshavebeenoffsetbysavingsinnuclearfuelcosts.Moreinformation onfactorsinfluencing thisprivateinvestment maybeobtainedfromtheEdisonElectricInstitute, 90ParkAvenue,NewYork,NewYork10016.Inconclusion, IwouldnotethattheNRCneitherpromotesnoropposesnuclearpowerperse,andthatwesharetheconcernoftheCongress, otherFederalagenciesandthevastmajorityofscientists andengineers sTheHonorable EdwardHutchinson 4",',thatmembersofthepublic,suchasHissJohnston, begiventhemostcomprehensive andaccurateinformation available astheymaketheirJudgments concerning thefutureofnuclearenergy.Sincerety, WilliamJDircksAssistant ExecUtive Diredot.'or Operations
Enclosure:
NRC's1975AnnualReportDISTRIBUTION:
R.J.N1,EDO:SPBW.G.Dooly,EDO:SPBJ.H.Cook,EDO:SPBEDOReadingFile(00428)E.Volgenau, IEB.Warnick,IECA(3)EdwardL.Jordan,IE,RegionIII799Roosevelt RoadGlenEllyn,Illinois60137DocketFiles(50-315and50-316)PDR'"'50-315and50-316)LocalPDR,(50-315and50-31(i)EDO:SPBEDOSPBELDEDOWJNahee.:.pmk...........MGDoo1y...
6/7/767/j/7/6//764VIIHAMCWDATC~PormAEC-318(RCT.9fS)hXCM02406//766//764V,4,OOVCIIHMCHT PAIHTIHOOPPICCII4TA444I44 fk EDWARDAUTCHlNSON RctRECENTATIYE INCDNOR4444THDI4TRICT, MICNIDAN601(gl'ESS DfffJESHf(EbSt6(CS@nudentSeyt;edentntib~s Kasfjtrtgtott,
%).C.20515COMMIT1EESI RANKINOMINORITYMEMOER,COMMITTEE ONTHCJUDIClhRY 1STANDARDS OFOFFICIAICONDUCTMRS<AeO.SCHUITZADMINI4TRATIVE A44IATANl'336 HOUSEOFFIC&BUILDINGPHONE;(202)225-3761Hay21,1976Congressional LiaisonOfficeNuclearRegulatory Commission 1717HStreet,N.W.Washington, D.C.20555Gentlemen:
Promptedbythereporting ofasmallradioactive le'akattheDonaldC.CooknuclearenergyplantatBridgman,
- Hichigan, IhavereceivedtheattachedletterfromHissHitziJohnstonofStevensville, IKchi-ganraisinganumberofquestions aboutthefutureandsafetyofnuclearplants.Iwouldappreciate asthorougharesponsetothequestions shehasraisedasyoucangiveinaletterImayforwardherinreply.Thankyouforyourcooperation.
Sincerely, Encl.~$1~~>~Sj,Ijr('Q.).iIDISTRICTOCFICESI201FCOCRALDOILOIND175TCRRIVORIAL RO.'l07FcocRALDINLDIN0E~MAUMccANDORDADST, DCNTONHARRORgMICHIGANADRIAN~MICNIOANPIRRICs(616)0257462PINRICa(517)2631630MRS,LLOYDPHILLIPS, SCCRCTARY MRS.FAUNPLATT,SCCRCTARY NitziJohnston...,pp,2236PawneePathStevensvil le,NI49127Nay:"1'4, 1976Honorable EdwardHutchinson HouseofRepresentatives 2336RayburnOfficeBuildingWashington, D.C.20515
DearSir:
Asaconcerned residentof'Michigan, Iamwritingtoyouaboutanissuethathasrecentlybeengivenaconsiderable amountofadversepublicity.
TheissueIamreferring toisthatofnuclearpowerplantsafety.BecauseIamlivinginStevensville, Ihaveaparticular interestintheDonaldC.CookNuclearfacilitynearBridgman.
Anarticlethatappearedinthe"Herald-Palladium" onTuesday,May11thindicated therehadbeenasmallradioactive releaseinapartoftheCookPlant.Ifanincidentsuchasthisisallowedtohappen,whatistopreventanoccurrence ofgreaterconsequence?
Arethereanyorganizations orfederalcommissions setuptomonitorandsafeguard againstanypossiblenuclearaccidents?.
Ifso,dotheystrictlyregulatetheactivities atnuclearplantsinvolving safetyrequirements?
Doyoufavorstricterregulations fornuclearplants?Doyoufeeltheoutcomeofthenuclearinitiative duetogobeforeCalifornia votersonJune8thwillhave,anyeffectonotherstates,inparticular ourstateofMichigan?
Also,hastherebeenanyrecentlegislation beforecongressonnuclearpowerplants;andifso,whathasyourstandbeen?Doyouseeadefinitefutureforatomicpowerascomparedtoconventional typesofpower?Canyouseeanyjustification forthebillionsofdollarsbeingspentonpresentplantsandthedevelopment offutureplants?Anyinformation youcangivemeonthissubjectwouldbegreatlyappreciated.
Sincerely yours,.NitziJohnston II0t'fi',W 4FROM:Rey>>R8mc4gecebQeee TO:ACTIONCONTROLDAESCOMPLDEADLINEACKNOWLEDGMENT INTERIMREPLYFINALREPi//FILELOCATICONTROLNOO0428'ATEOFDOCUMENTPREPAREFORSIGNATURE OF:~QCHAIRMANQEXECUTIVE, DIRECTOROTHERl'GLXCCQI2 DESCRIPTION LETTER.QMEMOQREPORTQOTHEREaeX'XteKa5ittiZehwateecixyxeaafag eencer@ceycxtMialiocetive iaaf'4RceeMC..6~eee~ootoq@eoCioes x'eCMeCeco5Safetyef'eueRentyamjhIateSPECIALINSTRUCTIONS ORREhhARKSDOCUMENT/COPY hlO,NUMBEROFPAGESPOSTALREGISTRYNO.CLASSIFIED DATACLASSIFICATION CATEGORYQNSIQRD.QFRDASSIGNEDTO'ATEINFORMATION ROUTINGLEGALREVIEW0FINAl,'COPYASSIGNEDTO)DATENOLEGALOBJECTIONS NOTIFY:QEDOAOMIN&CORRESBREXT.COMMENTS, NOTIFY:EXT.JCAENOTIFICATION RECOMMENDED:
QYES0NO...NRCFORM232I11751EXECUTIVE DIRECTORFOROPERATIONS DONOTRE>I/IOI/E THISCOPYPRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL COMMITTEESI EDWARD,HUTCHINSONRepReseIITATIYE olCONORess4THDlsTRIET, MIERISAII Co)(geess oftfjeHt(itchStates@nudeofSeyt;edentatibes 8faefjhrgtotf, 5,C.205152336HOUSEOFFICEBUILDINGPHONEI(202)2253761May21,1976RANKINGMINORITYMEMBER,COMMITIEE ONTHEJUDICIARY STANDARDS OFOFFICIAICONDUCTMRS.A.O.SCHULT2ADMIRISTRATIVS ASSISTAlrr Congressional LiaisonOfficeNuclearRegulatory Commission 1717HStreet,N.W.Washington, D.C.20555Gentlement Promptedbythereporting ofasmallradioactive leakattheDonaldC.CooknuclearenergyplantatBridgman,
- Michigan, IhavereceivedtheattachedletterfromMissMitziJohnstonofStevensville, Michi-ganraisinganumberofquestions aboutthefutureandsafetyofnuclearplants.Iwouldappreciate asthorougharesponsetothequestions shehasraisedasyoucangiveinaletterImayforwardherinreply.Thankyouforyourcooperation.
Sincerely, Encl.I'f1wh())I>><<PII,)5~t-7(CC>>,~.DISTRICTOFFICES:201FEOERALBOILOIRO$75TERRITORIAL BO.BEIITORHARSOR>>MICRIOAII PI<<ORE<<(616)9257962MRSLLOYDPHILLIPS>>
SCCRSTARY 107FeoERALBUILDIRCE.MAUMSEANDBRoADST.ADRIAR,MICRICARPIRRIEI(517)26516SOMRS.FAUNPLATT>>SECRETARY 4sy~~4%e>,)cyp'gg,)>>/(f;<,'.'"'~u c:~i=a~pC~~iv>.TB+a'La~%~~pS>('<JMichigan's FourthDistrictincludestheCoun-tiesofBerrien,Branch,Cass,Hi)lydatq
$yxceptt.itchiield CityandTovrnship),
- Lenaviee, rCSIf.Joseph'(e>cepf'keonid'a~s<'favI'rsshipI,"
Vanpg~~~'l)ign)'g'g""'ga'I('sMt.>ton,'e<~(-~s~~i,(g,-Burlap,qrp(fthe(,Tqwpyh~pq of.gqtyndoq)5lnd
~.~lVekat~shb:i~
calhounouhty.~'t~':~<<=~!'.'aJU<I,JVANDUPRN~~llnl')'~llIIPARIANlCASSIl$T.40%L'PHllQA&wnswteIIIIILEHAVPK0<o'w'~I,fN.QHt0ie MitziJohnston2236PawneePathStevensvi1 1e,MI49127May14,1976Honorable EdwardHutchinson HouseofRepresentatives 2336RayburnOfficeBuildingWashington, D.C.20515
DearSir:
Asaconcerned residentofMichigan, Iamwritingtoyouaboutanissuethathasrecentlybeengivenaconsiderable amountofadversepublicity.
Theissue'Iamreferring toisthatofnuclearpowerplantsafety.BecauseIamlivinginStevensville, Ihaveaparticular interestintheDonaldC.CookNuclearfacilitynearBridgman.
Anarticlethatappearedinthe"Herald-Palladium" onTuesday,May11thindicated therehadbeenasmallradioactive releaseinapartoftheCook,Plant.
Ifanincidentsuchasthisisallowedtohappen,whatistopreventanoccurrence ofgreaterconsequence?
Arethereanyorganizations orfederalcommissions setuptomonitorandsafeguard againstanypossiblenuclearaccidents?
Ifso,dotheystrictlyregulatetheactivities atnuclearplantsinvolving safetyrequirements?
Doyoufavorstricterregulations fornuclearplants?Doyoufeeltheoutcomeofthenuclearinitiative duetogobeforeCalifornia votersonJune8thwillhaveanyeffectonotherstates,inparticular ourstateofMichigan?
Also,hastherebeenanyrecentlegislation beforecongressonnuclearpowerplants;andifso,whathasyourstandbeen?Doyouseeadefinitefutureforatomicpowerascomparedtoconventional typesofpower?Canyouseeanyjustification forthebillionsofdollarsbeingspentonpresentplantsandthedevelopment offutureplants?Anyinformation youcangivemeonthissubjectwouldbegreatlyappreciated.
Sincerely yours,MitziJohnston a~~14
~UNITEDSTATESNUCLEAWREGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O.C.20555July1,1976OFFICEOFTHESECRETARY DirectorOfficeoftheFederalRegisterNationalArchivesandRecordsServiceWashington, D.C.20408
DearSir:
Enclosedforpublication intheFederalRegisterareanoriginalandtwocertified copiesofadocumententitled:
INDIANAANDHICHIGANELECTRICCOHPANY,ETALDocketNo.50-3i5NOTICEOFISSUANCEOFAN"NDMENT TOFACILITYOPERATING LICENSEPublication oftheabovedocumentattheearliestpossibledatewouldbeappreciated.
Sincerely, SamuelJ.ChilkSecretary oftheCommission
Enclosures:
Originaland2certified copiesbcc:CentralFilesnoationServicesLegalDirectorOfficeofCongressional AffairsOGCSECYFiles UNITEDSTATESNUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKETNO.50-315INDIANAANDMICHIGANELECTRICCOMPANYNDIANAANDMICHIGANPOWERCOMPANYIDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITINOTICEOFISSUANCEOFAMENDMENT TOCILITYPERATINGLICENSENoticeisherebygiventhattheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission (theCommission) hasissuedAmendment No.16toFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-58issuedtoIndianaandMichiganElectricCompanyandIndianaIOandMichiganPowerCompany.Theamendment revisestheTechnical Specifica-tionsforoperation oftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnit1locatedinBerrienCounty,Michigan, andiseffective asofthedateofitsissuance.
Theamendment changescertainTechnical Specifications toextendthetimeintervalwithinwhichthefirstdemonstration ofdieselgenerator operability following initialcriticality maybeperformed.
Theapplication fortheamendment complieswiththestandards andrequirements oftheAtomicEnergyActof1954,asamended(theAct),andtheCommission's rulesandregulations.
TheCommission hasmadeappropriate findingsrequiredbytheActandtheCoomission's rulesandregulations in10CFRChapterI.Thesefindingsaresetforthinthelicenseamendment.
Priorpublicnoticeofthisamendment isnotrequiredbecausetheamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
TheCommission hasdetermined thattheissuanceofthisamendment willnotresultinanysignificant environmental impactandthat,pursuant
'>>~~~>>~to10CFR551.5(d)(4),
anenvironmental statement, negativedeclaration orenvironmental impactappraisal neednotbepreparedinconnection withissuanceofthisamendment.
Forfurtherdetailswithrespecttothisaction,see(1)theJune11;1976andJune24,1976lettersofapplication foramendment, (2)Amendment No.16toLicense.No.DPR-58,(3)theCommission's lettertothelicenseedatedJune25,1976,and(4)theCommission's relatedsafetyevaluation.
Alloftheseitemsareavailable for.publicinspection attheComoission.'s PublicDocumentRoom,1717HStreet,NW,Washington, D.C.,andattheSt.JosephPublicLibrary,500MarketStreet,St.Joseph,Michigan49085.Acopyofitems(2),(3),and(4)maybeobtaineduponrequestaddressed totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.20555,Attention:
- Director, DivisionofProjectManagement.
DatedatBethesda,
- Maryland, this25thdayofJune1976.FORTHENUCLEARREGULATORY OMMISSION:
KarlKniel,ChiefLight'ater ReactorsBranchNo.2DivisionofProjectManagement,
UNITEDSTATESNUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKETNO.50-315INDIANAANDMICHIGANELECTRICCOMPANYINDIANAANDMICHIGANPOKIERCOMPANYIDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITlNOTICEOFISSUANCEOFAMENDMENT TOCILITYOPERATING LICENSENoticeisherebygiventhattheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commsssion (theCommission) hasissuedAmendment No.16toFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-58issuedtoIndianaandMichigan, ElectricCompanyandIndianaandMichiganPowerCompany.Theamendment revisestheTechnical Specifica-tionsforoperation oftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnit1locatedinBerrienCounty,Michigan, andiseffective asofthedateofitsissuance.
Theamendment changescertainTechnical Specifications toextendthetimeintervalwithinwhichthefirstdemonstration ofdieselgenerator operability following initialcriticality maybeperformed.
Theapplication fortheamendment complieswiththestandards andrequirements oftheAtomicEnergyActof1954,asamended(theAct),andtheCommission's rulesandregulations.
TheCommission hasmadeappropriate findingsrequiredbytheActandtheComnission's rulesandregulations in10CFRChapterI.Thesefindingsaresetforthinthelicenseamendment.
Priorpublicnoticeofthisamendment isnotrequiredbecausetheamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
TheCommission hasdetermined thattheissuanceofthisamendment willC:notresultinanysignificant environmental impactandthat,pursuant
to10CFR551.5(d)(4),
anenvironmental statement, negativedeclaration orenvironmental impactappraisal neednotbepreparedinconnection withissuance, ofthisamendment.
Forfurtherdetailswithrespecttothisaction,see(1)theJune11;1976andJune24,1976lettersofapplication foramendment, (2)Amendment INo.16toLicenseNo.DPR-58,(3)theCommission's lettertothelicenseedatedJune25,1976,and(4)theCommission's relatedsafetyevaluation.
Alloftheseitemsareavailable forpublicinspection attheComnission's PublicDocumentRoom,1717HStreet,NW,Washington, D.C.,andattheSt.JosephPublicLibrary,500MarketStreet,St.Joseph,Michigan49085.Acopyofitems(2),(3),and(4)maybeobtaineduponrequestaddressed
~totheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.20555,Attention:
- Director, D-'vision ofProjectManagement.
DatedatBethesda,
- Maryland, this25thdayofJune1976.FORTHENUCLEARREGULATORY OMMISSION:
KarlKniel,ChiefLightWaterReactorsBranchNo.2DivisionofProjectManagement
(
DocketHos.E50-316Honorable BirchEayhUnitedStatesSenate'
DearSenatorBayh:
IntheirletterofE'arch3,l975tothePresident, Coauaission, ThomasDavisandLindaSueJacobshave,ofwhyconstruction workhasstoppedattheDonaldSridgman, Hichigan.
Explanation oftheproblemistotheproblemisnot.whichyouforwarded totheaskedforanexplanation C.CooknuclearPlantnearsimple,butthesolutionTheoperatoroftheD.C.CookPlant,IndianaandHichiganElectricCompany,hastoldusthatthecompanydoesnothaveenoughmoneynowtocontinueconstruction workonthesecondunitatthesite.TheCookplantconsistsoftwonuclearunits.Unit1isnowinthelaterstagesofoperational testingand,ifthetestingcontinues assmoothlyasithassofar,Unit1shouldbefullyoperational laterthisspring.Con-struction ofUnit2wasabout6OXcor1plete when.construction workwasstopped-in late1974.Vedonotknowwhenconstruction villberesumed.Thefinancial problemsqftheCookplantarenotunique.Construction ofseveralothe"nuclearpowerplantshasbeendelayedbyotherelectricutilitycompanies forthesamereason:lackoffunds.Highinterestratesonborrowedmoneyandhigherconstruction costsdueto.inflation aretwoofthemajorfactorsthathaveaffectedutilities'bility toraisethemoneyneededtobuildnewplants.AlthoughtheHuclearPegulatory Commission isawareofthisproblem,itis,asyouknow,notinapositiontofosterasolution.
Thefinancial problemsoftheutilities areentwinedintheeconomicproblemsthatarenationalinscope.IIhopethatthisletterwillbehelpfultoyouinreplying'o Hr.Davis'ndHs.Jacobs'nouiry.Sincerely, OriginalSignedBgA.Giambusso A.Ciambusso, Director(DivisionofReactorLicensing SeepreviousyellowforconcrepceOffi<<of h<<le<<pect<<Li<<nsing OPPICC~SVRNAMRWOATC3P,L'llR,2;2RABenedic
- as4/1/75C0"
- RL~~Aaiai%usso,4//75'CL4//75FormhRC-318(Rev.9.33)hECM0240AV,8,OOYCRNMRNT PRINTINOOPPICKIIOT4644144 I)4hItPl Honorable BirchBayh
Enclosure:
Ltr.toPresident.
fromThomasG.DavisandLindaSueJacobsdtd.3/3/75DISTRIBUTION:
DocketFileNRCPDR4eca4-PBR NRRReadingLWR2-2FileEGCaseELDOCL(3)GErtter(DR-8417)
JCookMGroffEHughesAFerguson RABenedict MServiceVAMooreIE(3)KKnielJStolz'SchwencerOParrWButlerDVassallo P.CotaMSlaterOPPIC4~SURNAME~CATNAPFormhBC.318(RST.9.33)hBCbi02404V4OOVCRNMENT PRINTINOOPPICEI1074400100 0'tIkIl,%4+IL$~irs~,J$(gf'3fi~
,FROÃSea.slm4Ryk,'(xa8
)CONTROLNUMBER8417FILELOCA,TION DATEOFDOCUMENTACTIONCOMPLETION DEADLINEcn8nte6.(cee40/27JM,41%$79TO~I.'RgAACTIONPROCESSING DATESAcknowledged InteriplyF;g5PREPAREFORSIGNATURE OF:ChairmonDirectorofRegulation
~XCtaeboana DESCRIPTION, g4g'Original QCopyDO~her,:,R@B;egXtrfa'iieet8.&VS6f%aASI4la4aeebaeeAe=Pmaidcec; 4eqeLt4ug eeelatedelfWeQcmMC.Coch@lealREMARKSQQ~Q$$$gcewmeaegeeeze withxaplyVaxhemveXoyetoAbaca"Greg@1M~yoaXPMT'EFERRED TODATEISNOTIFICATION TOTHEJCAERECOMMENDED?
CysCateReebokNiaa)M-SiSF55,)$9-N6DIRECTOROFREGULATION COMMUNICATIONS
'CONTROLFormHQ-32(1-73)USAEC Pleasenotetheatt'ached letterfromaconstituent whichIamforwarding foryourconsideration.
It.wouldbegreatlyappreciated ifyou.would checkintothismatter.Uponcompletion ofyourinvestigation, pleaseadvisemeofthestatusofthiscaseinduplicate andreturntheoriginalletterinanenvelopeThsnkyouforyourassistance.
Sincerely, IBirchBayhUnitedStatesnator8417 4'O~lz~C V"~";'Pw.OFC6"'OdiNiSTAATOR 16llWestClintonGoshen,TN,.4652$March3,lj~tjg@R2bNl908ThePresident oftheUnitedStates1600Pennsylvania AvenueWash1ngton, D.C.,Nr.President:
Inordertobecomemoreinformedaboutoneofthe=stepsbe1ngtaken,tobringaboutanationalindependence ofenergy,we'-"wenttodgytothes1te0ftheCooki'uclearPoweiStat1GllGnLakeMichigan.
Whenwearr1vedatthesitewewereinformedthattoursand,information sessionswerenot;beinggivenand.thatallworkontheproJect;wasata'tandstill.
rAsyoucanunderstand, wewereanzalled.
Wehavebeenbombarded fromevervsourcewit)>theassuza-ce thatwehadaproblemwithanenergyshortage, butthateveryoossiblestemwasbeingtakentoinsurethera~idtransition of1nternational sourcestonationalindependence.
Wedo,notknowhowmuchmoneyhasbeenexpendedatthissitetodate,buttodrooitno'~isawaste.Eachmonthourlightbillrisest;.oaccountforincreases inafueladJustment.
Everveveningweread.newstatist;1cs onunemployment.
Itwouldseemthatthis>>astingproJect;couldbeasourceofcureforbothenergyandunemployment problems.
Maywepleasehaveanexolanation astowhyworkhasbeenstoppedonthisoroJectand~hatwemayexpect1ntheoroJect's future.PV,thi,c~'t~Sincerely, Thomasu.DavisEcLindaSueJacob.cc:VanceHartkeBirchHayhMJohnBradamas 4IL~V
'ROM'ea~~ch~find,)CONTROLNUMBERDATEOFDOCUMENTeFILELORATION1IACTIOMPLETION DEADLINEPrTOACTIONPROCESSING DATESAcknowledged3i&f7$'nterimReplyFinalDESCRIPTION
@Original TpMQCopyQOtherBaaleyXte5aThreatC.RaViSIgcHmdaSeaJezebelCO@hePMSiCQQCifLQQiC4QS C'0SCSCCA%-OfWOCC82QMCeCCOk$487?CPREPAREFORSIGNATURE OF:ChairmanDirectarofRegulation XChmbesseREMARKS~%3@5RaLheavoXopeteShe:QxcggBcSKKN$REFERREDTOCSaebasso f&cekcaDATEISNOTIFICATION TOTHEJCAERECOMMENDED?
Case~et.FS.'ee)50-N5SR)59M,6DONOTDETACHTHISCOPYDIRECTOROFREGULATION COMMUNIC+TlONS
.CONTROL.,.~,FormHQ-32lI-73)USAEC
~kIIr~'~IP'q~IIr+~~errr~,yhVr~~I'I~1e>'r=~IL"I~~r~Lp'I~~"'IgrP~~rP~~r CVI~~>'lHttiteu Stated&mateMEMORANDuM Pleasenotetheattachedletterfromaconstituent whichIamforwarding foryourconsidexati'on.
Xt.wouldbegreatlyappxeciated if'ou.vould checkintothisu"tter.Uponcompletion ofyourinvestigation, pleaseadvisemeofthestatusofthiscaseinduplicate andreturntheoriginalletterinanenvelopeThankyouforyourassistance.
Sincerely,
/BirchEayhUnitedStatesnator lgU.S.tN:.RGYPWlwCIIYOFC,OFPiQIll,'ilS'i BATOR1611t1estClintonGoshen,IN,46526%parch3~ltd)g42eAfh9PS~C.*CThePresident oftheUnitedStates1600Pennsylvania AvenueWashington, D.C.,Nr.President:
Inordertobecomemoreinformedaboutoneofthestepsbeingtakentobringaboutanationalindependence ofenergy,weeswenUtodaytoLhesiteoftheCookk~uclearPowerSvvi011oilLakeMichigan.
Nhenwearrived.atthesitewewereinformed.
thattoursand.information sessionswerenotbeinggivenandthatallworkontheprospectwasatastandstill.
Asyoucanunderstand.,
wewereappalled.
Vehavebeenbombarded fromevervsouce<<1ththeassuzat;ce thatwehadaproblemw1thanenergyshortage, butthatevervpossiblestenwasbeingtakentoinsurethera~idtransition ofinternational sourcestonational.independence.
Vedonotknowhowmuchmoneyhasbeenexoendedatthissitetodate,buttodrooitno'sa<<aste.Eachmonthourlightbillrisestoaccountforincreases inafuelad,)ustment.
Everyeveningwereadnewstatist1cs onunemployment.
It.wouldseemthatthisi'astingprospectcouldbeasourceofcureforbothenergvandunemployment problems.
Naywepleasehaveanexplanation astowhvworkhasbeenstoppedonthisoroJectand.'hatwemayexoectinthepro)ect's future.Sincerelv, Thomas~.Davis&LindaSueJacobscc:VanceHartkeBirchBayhMJohnBradamas I\pag~r'ybi DocketNos.50-31550-316MAR251975.Honorable JohnBrademasHouseofRepresentatives
DearMr.'rademas:
IntheirletterofMarch3,1975tothePresident, whichyouforwarded totheCommission, ThamesDavisandLindaSueJacobshaveaskedforanexpla-nat1onofwhyconstruct1on workhasstoppedattheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantnearBridgman, Michigan.
Explanation oftheproblemisa&pie,butthesolutiontotheproblemisnot.TheoperatoroftheD.C.CookPlant,IndianaandMichiganElectricCompany,hastoldusthatthecompanydoesn'thaveenoughmoneynowtocontinueconstruction workanthesecondunitatthesite.TheCookplantconsistsoftwonuclearunits.Unit1isnowinthelaterstagesofoperational testingand,ifthe.testingprogramcontinues assmoothlyasithassofar,Unit1shouldbefullyoperational laterthisspring.Construction ofUnit2wasabout60/completewhenconstruction workwasstoppedinlate1974.Hedonotknowwhenconstruction willberesumed.Thefinancial problemsoftheCookplantare'notunique.Construction ofseveralothernuclearpowerplantshasbeendelayedbyotherelectricut1lityconpanies forthesamereason:lackoffunds.Highinterestratesonborrawedmoneyandh1gherconstruction costsduetoinflation aretwoofthema)orfactorsthathaveaffectedutilities'bility toraisethemoneyneededtobuildnewplants.AlthoughtheNuclearRegulatory Commission isawareofthisproblem;itis,asyouknow,notinapositiontofosterasolution.
Thefinancial problemsoftheutilities areentwined1ntheeconomicproblems'that arenationalinscope.IhopethatthisletterwillbehelpfultoyouinreplyingtoMf.Dilvis'andMs.Jacobs'nqu1ry.
Sincerely, OriginalSjgncdByA.GiRInbuSSO A.Giambusso,,
DirectorDivisionofReactorLicensing OfficeofNucleareactp&Regulatian OPPICR~0URNAMK~OAT0~LMRenedi'ct:as 3/21/75L2-2KKniel-.'3'@;j/7"5""3/jt/75DDRL.Qf3AGiambusso.
3jgP/75POrmhEC-31S(R0T.9.55)hZCM0240AV,8,OOVRRNMRNT PRINTINOOPPICRIIOT4020I00 41~44J'II4)44IF11itI~II4'1-4FF)iitt'II,'g14JFW>'y)IJlIl+..44I',IP')L*'J-4'I/lI4.~,s)pfffgI'I DISTRIBUTION:
D'ocketFileNRCPDRNRRREadingLWR2-2FileEGCaseELDOCLQ)G.Ertter(DR-8343)
J.CookM.GroffE.HughesA.FergusonR.A.BenedictM.ServiceVAMooreIE(3)K.KnielJ.StolzA.Schwencer O.ParrW.ButlerD.VassalloP.CotaM.Slater'arr>cc9>-
e>>>>>>AMC~
DATC9s'onshKC.518(Rev.955)hECM02>0orocse>ee>see.>eso.eei
'erE41IIIIl'P'IIIgI FRCMRep.John3radeiras (Tnd.)ToKRCCONTROLNUMBER8343-DATEOFDOCUMENT3/10/75ACTIONPROCESSING DATESAcknowiedrted 3/1f/75InteriplF;no>FILEOCATIONACTIONCOMPLETION DEADLINE3/24/75PREPAREFORSIGNATURE OF:'hoirmanDirectoroiRegulation Giambusso DFSCRIPTION Ltr@origaiQCopyC3Other<cP"?ITIS">>nclltrfmThomasG.>GLindaSueJacobsinquiring xethestatusoftheDonaldC.CookplantREMARKSitfarkenvelop'e toAttn:LindaHoffmanLPDR?!UCtREFFRREDTOGiembussof/action3/17/75ISHOTIFICATIOII TOTHEJC~A~~gII//RECOMMENDED?~
AJFFir2-8/r~/7~"CaseDocketPiles)50-315PDR50316DONOTDETACHTHISCOPYDIRECTOROFREGULATION COMMUtilCATIONS
'CONTROLFormHQ-32(1-73)USAEC FROMRep.JohnBrademas(l:nd.)0HRCCONTROLNUMSER8343DATEOFDOCUMENT3/10/75ACTIONPROCESSING DATESAcr<now!edged 3/14'/75InteriplFin.~PFILE'CATIONACTIONCOMPLETION DEADLINE~3/m75PREPARF:FORSIGNATURE OF:ChairmanDirectorofRegulation
~XGiambusso DESCRIPTION LtrK)original QCopyQOtherEnclltrfmThomasG<PLindaSueJacobsinquiring rethestatusoftheDonaldC.CookplantREMARKSMarkenvelopetoAttn:LindaHoffmanIIIREFERREDToGiambusso f/actionDATE3/17/75ISNOTIFICATION TTHEJC~-"RECOhNENDEDe~r-~/WIJ"wi-8/>>t7CaseDocketPiles)50>>315PDR50-316DONOTDETACHTHISCOPYDIRECTOROFREGULATION COMMUNICATIONS
'CONTROLFormHQ-32(1-73)USAECI (Congress offfjeRaftsStates%)ouseofScpccs'cntatibes 5Hnsgfngton,
Ã).C./1975NuclearRegulatoryC'o'mIoLsion Sir:Theattached.
communication issentforyourconsideration.
Pleas'einvestigate hestatements contained.
thereinand.forwardmeIthhnecessary information forre--ply,rere-4SPYourstruly,JohnBrademas, MC.3rdD.,Ind.Attn:LindaHoffman
~hIs1611WestClin'tonGoshen,IN46526March3,19'75ThePresident oftheUnitedStates1600Pennsylvania AvenueWashington, D.C.Mr.President:
tInordertobecomemore1nformedaboutoneofthe',,s$eosbe1ngtakentobringaboutanationalindenendence ofenergy,wewenctodaytothesiteoftheCook."nuclear PowerStationonLakeM1chigan.
Whenwearrivedatthes1tewewere'.1nformedthattoursandinformation sessionswerenotbeinggivenand.thatallworkontheproJectwasatastandst111.
Asyoucanunderstand, wewerearvalled.
Wehavebeenbombarded fromevervsourcewiththeassurance thatwehadaproblemwithanenergyshortage, butthatevery'ossible sCenwasbe1ngtakentoinsurethera~idtransition,'of international sourcestonationalindependence.
Wedonotknowhowmuchmoneyhasbeenexpendedatthissitetodate,buttodrovitno"isawaste.Eachmonthourlightbillrisestoaccountforincreases 1nafueladJustment.
Everyeveningwereadnewstatistics onunemployment.
ItwouldseemthatthiswastingproJectcouldbeasourceofcureforbothenergvandunemployment problems.
Maywepleasehaveanexplanation astowhvworkhasbeenstoppedonthisoroJectand~hatwemayexpectintheoroJect's future.VSincerely, Thomas~.DavisEcLindaSueJacobscc:VanceHartkeBirchBayhJohnBradamas~
~)~/~/"~/<~~~ge~gLIt'wcmate~TIIA8~~--
'ItIt1 Congressoftfje'SnitchStateegooseofRepeedentntibes 58asgnotoa, 33.C.,l975NuclearRegulatory CommLaion Sir:Tneattachedcommunication issentforyourconsideration.
Pleaseinvestigate thestatements contained thereinandforward.methenecessary information forre-ply,rere-Yourstruly,~JohnBrademas,
~C.3rdD.,Ind.Attn:LindaHoffman C<<~~V'<<<<<<'<<:
<<<<%'<<<<*4<<,<<<<1611WestClintonGoshen,IN4'526March3,1975.ThePresident oftheUnitedSt;ates1600Pennsylvania AvenueWashington, D.C.Mr.President;:
Inordertobecomemoreinformdaboutoneofthesteasbe1ngtakentobringaboutanationalindependence ofenergy,wewe.~todaytothesiteoftheCoo'-N"cle"-PowerStationonZakeMichigan.
When'earr1vedat;thesit;ewewere1nformedthattoursandinformation sessionswerenotbeinggivenandthatallworkontheproJectwasatastandst111.
Asyoucanunderstand.
wewerea.z.alled.
Wehavebeentombarded fromevervsourcewiththeassu:a"ce thatvehadaproblemwithanenergyshortage, butthatevervoossiolester.was,.being takentoinsurethera"idtransit'.on nfinternational sourcestonationalindeoendence.
Wedo'not;knowhowmuchmoneyhasbeenexoendedatthissitetodate,buttodroeitno'sawaste.>~chmonthourlightbillrisestoaccountforincreases inafueladJustment.
Everyeveningweread.newstatistics onunemployment.
Itwouldseem=that thisrastingproJectcould.beasourceofcureforbothenergvandunem~loyzent rroblems.
Maywepleasehaveanexplanation astovhvworkhasbeenst;oppedonthisaroJectand.~hatwemayexpect1ntheoroJect',s future.Sincerelv,'homas
~.Dav1s&L,indaSueJacobscc:VanceHartkeBirchEayhJohnBradamas~
e,)~s.Al,'AClhI51E('C14-4H'I~'"uP
- FPOM'repk:Jetra szsrtrerrs, (to@.yyCONTROLNUMBER.8343DATEOFDOCUMENTFILELOCATIONTIONCOMPLETION DEADLINE~/~~j'nTOACTIONPROCESSING DATESAcknowledged 0/i4795RCInteiimReplyFinalPREPAREFORSIGNATURE OF:ChairmanDirectorofRegulation ZIfiaCmSOODESCRIPTION LCC'Original QCopyQOtherREMARKSEeetLee5aXhoausG.5LindaSueJacal~stringrcthf:elateseftheQanaidC.CookphmtMarlccavHogetotheAt.tn:Ands1MfeenREFERREDTODATECLambveso SfactLenSfi7)7$ISNOTIFICATION TOTHEJCAERECOMMENDED?
Cye:CgseBoche0les}50-M5PSR59-315t.DONOTDETACHTHISCOPYDIRECTOROFREGULATION COMMUNICATIONS CONTROLFormHQ.32(I73),'SAEC p~~8~%g$~1.r1CII1ptcbV*Iq CongressOftfjeKnits)State5P)ouseofBepeedentatibes 58asfjlnglon, Q.C.,l975NuclearRegulatory CommLBion Theattached.
communication issentforyourconsideration.
Pleaseinvestigate thestatements contained.
thereinandforward.methenecessary information forre-ply,rere-SPg.r.Yourstruly,JohnBrademas, MC.3rdD.,End.Attn:LindaHoMnan~,~
1611WestClintonGoshen,IN46526Narch3,1975ThePresident o.theUnitedStates1600Pennsylvania AvenueWashington, D.C.llr.President:
Xnordertobecomemore1nformedaboutoneofthesteasbeingtakentobringaboutanationalindenendence ofenergy,wewenetodaytothesite'oftheCook"uclePowerSttioxlGl1LakeMichigan.
Whenwearrivedatthesitewewereinformedthattoursandinformat1on sessionswerenotbeinggivenandthatallworkonthepro)ectwasatastandstill.
Asyoucanunderstand, we~cerea.palled.Vehavebeer.Lombarded fromevervsourcewiththeassura",ce thatvehadaproblemw1thanenergyshortage, butthatevervpossiblestenwasbeingtakentoinsurethera"idtransit!on nf1nternational sourcestonationalindeoendence.
Wedonotknowhowmuchmoneyhasbeenexoendedatthiss1tetodate,buttodrooitno'sawaste.Eachmonthour11ghtbillrisestoaccountforincreases inafuelad,]ustment.
Everveven1ngwereadnewstatist1cs onunemployment.
Itwouldseemthat'hisiastingpro)ectcouldbeasourceof.cureforbothenergvandunemoloyvent problems.
Naywepleasehaveanexplanation astovhvworkhasbeenstoppedon'thisoro)ectand.~hatvemavexpect1ntheoroJect's future.Sincerelv, cc:VanceHartkeBirchEayhJohnBradaaas~
Thomas~.Dav1s4L1ndaSueJacobs*~I\