ML18044A094

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:59, 29 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2017 Byron Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4
ML18044A094
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/2017
From: Seymour J L, Bielby M E
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Seymour J L
Shared Package
ML17152A386 List:
References
50-454/OL-17, 50-455/OL-17
Download: ML18044A094 (1)


Text

ES,30lSimulator Scenario Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-4Test No.: ?olDate of Exam:ScenarioNumbers:

I l2lIIQUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnitialsab*coThe initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,but it does not cue the operators into expected events./7tvlftqq2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.u1Atlr¿3. Each event description consists of the following o the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crewo the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable) w4tø4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

r//14ttd"5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain completeevaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

røt1[p,6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have suffcient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given.N4ftcr7. The simulator modeling is not altered.fict11'lc¿8. The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d),

any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

hltnilrØ9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301tl.ult1il,ffi10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit theform along with the simulator scenarios).

wl/4tPr11The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors.

(Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

l,lbl4rlçø12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

f\øil11iltâl13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, whenpossible.

txn'4{r,14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

till4llpûTarget Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)Actual Attributes

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)3t2tt/znlpttutlø2. Abnormal events (2-4)Ll t 3 t 2lLlhIbilnAlld%3. Major transients (l-2)t t tttllr1/,tlm4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)2tt tttlltallril/t25Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 1 per scenarioset)^,I,ttIil\bl4ûp6. Preidentifed critical tasks (¿ 2)2t2.tzl2iltvlnl(çrz. The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests.# An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required