ML18044A094

2017 Byron Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4

ML18044A094
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	12/14/2017
From:	Jesse Seymour, Bielby M NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Seymour J
Shared Package
ML17152A386	List: BYRON 2017-0088, 2017 Byron Station Initial License Examination Letter Submitting Examination ML18043A097 ML18043A102 ML18043A104 ML18044A090 ML18044A094 ML18044A101
References
50-454/OL-17, 50-455/OL-17
Download: ML18044A094 (1)

Text

ES,30l Simulator Scenario Qua litv Checklist Form ES-301-4 Date of Exam: ScenarioNumbers: I l2l I Test No.: ?ol I

lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* co The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. /7 tvl ftqq

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. u1 A tlr¿

3. Each event description consists of the following o the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated o

the the the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew expected operator actions (by shift position) w4 tø

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. r// 14 ttd"

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

rø t1 [p,

6. lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

N 4 Operators have suffcient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given. ftcr

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. fict 11 'lc¿

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

hlt n ilrØ

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 tl.ul t1 il,ffi

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

wl /4 tPr The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 11 rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) l,lbl 4 rlçø

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified f\øil 11 on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). iltâl

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

tx n '4{r,

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. till 4 llpû Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3t2tt/z nlpt tu tlø

2. Abnormal events (2-4) Ll t 3 t 2lLl hIbil nA lld%

3. Major transients (l-2) t t tttll r1 /, tlm

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2tt tttl ltal lr il/t2 5 Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions set) 1 per scenario

^,I,ttI il\bl 4 ûp

6. Preidentifed critical tasks (¿ 2) 2t2.tzl2 iltvl n l(çrz

. The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required