ML13135A241
| ML13135A241 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 10/31/2012 |
| From: | ABS Consulting |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML131350549 | List:
|
| References | |
| L-13-118, TAC MF0092, TAC MF0093, TAC MF0116, TAC MF0159 | |
| Download: ML13135A241 (215) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:APPENDIX C: AREAWALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCS) pOe Paul C. lti:zo Ass'ciates, I'c.AreaRooml:\(;ll'lt:IRS ti CONSI 'l:lA\ ItWalk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 710Floor El.Status:@710Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CHS-FCVl I4ANYNYNYNYXXXX Itaul C. Rizzo Associates. [nc.AreaRoom Floorli\tllNFLRl r\ C{lN!1.:t:l,{}* fSWalk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 710Evaluated by:7r0_/Brian A. LucarelliEl.Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identi/ied regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Eddie M. GuerraDate:Date:Status:N/At0lr0l2012l0ll0l20r2XXXX Status:@Sheet 3 of 2L2UNArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 7IORoomFloor El.710Bldg.N XLBOther supporting or rclcvant docuttrcnts and photos (if any):Filc Nanrc: l-59-6-3-01 .jpcgDcscription: Arca gcltcral vicwFilc Nanrc: l-(10-6-3-0 L.ipcgDcscriptiott: Arca gcttcral vicw pOe Paul c' Ilizzu Associates, l'c.f \*CINFhRs.\ (:(lN5l,:l.ll.tN lSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 710 Boron Tank@Sheet 4 of 2L2N/AN/ARoomFloor El.710Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?No degraded conditions identified in the area3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2SIS-MOV867AXXXX pCe Paul C. ltizz* Associates, l'c.l' \{;lNSl:RS \' e(}N\tll I {}.. fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.AXLB 710 Boron Tank710Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identdied regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 5 of 2L2NiAt0lr0l20r2r0n0l20l2XXXXEvaluated bv:, .1-,-' / .,/ , /i. l,r, /i .i ; I--.1., :i,_--L.\-JBrian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date: Paul C. Riszo Associatesr Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSULTANITArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room AXLB 7l0 Boron TankStatus: @Sheet 6 of 2L2UFloor El.7l0 Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-5-3-01 jpegDescription: General view of valves in the areaFile Name: I -60-5-3-01 jpegDescription: Overall view of boron tank pCa- Ilaul C. llizzt) Associates, l.c.AreaRoomIj\{llN[t:R$ At C()N:l:l 1',{}..'lSWalk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 7IO HXFloor El.YSheet 7 of ZLZN/AN/AAXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Most of 20- 1" diam.flange nuts at outlet nozzle.fbr HX2CCP-82 I C were identifiedwith surface coruosion. CR-2012-14459 was issued to address this /inding.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Surface rust at base plate of small diameter tubing in the area was identi/ied. Judgednot to be a concern.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Wall mounted speaker located over 2SWS-PII02Cl identified to be properlysupported. Judged not a concernJbr potential inleraction.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-E21A7r0Bldg.XXXX pOe lraul C. [{izzo Assr'rciates, l*c.I X(;lNliI.:RS Ai CONSLjII ASISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room AXLB 710 HXFloor El. 710Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e. 9., scaffolding, lead shiel ding) ?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 8 of 2L2N/AN/Ar0n0l20r2 t0lr0l2012XXXXEvaluated bv:., -rr,--. - i ,/ ,, l,, l,-: lY.i' ,i IL? --' '* i.Brian A. t-ucarelli-;&Itl";,J'rEddie M. GuerraDate: Date: Paul C. Itizzo Associates, Inc.t. NGINEBRS & CONSLII-T AI\"I$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Sheet 9 of 2L2URoomFloor El.AXLB 7IO HX7t0Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-4-3-01 jpegDescription: Drums in the area identified to be properly restrainedFile Name: I -60-4-3-01 jpegDescription: Scaffold identified in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.IINGINEERS & CONST rL:I:4N fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-65-4-3-01 jpegDescription: Pulley in the area noted to be properly restrainedFile Name: l-66-4-3-01 jpegDescription: General view of Heat ExchangerSheet tO of 2L2URoomFloor El.AXLB 7IO HX7t0l-66-4-3-01 jpeg Sheet LL of 2L2RoomFloor El.AXLB 7IO HXPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &. C'ONSULTANI'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Bldg.AXLBDescription: Mild corrosion identified on nuts of 2CCP-821C outletnozzle7t0File Name: l-67 -4-3-01 jpeg [)aul C. Ililzo Associates. lnc.I'I.-clNf FRS !r t:()NstlII:{}"1SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L2 of 2L2N/ARoomFloor El.AXLB 71 8718Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Scqf/blding located in the area. Judged not to presenl an inleraction concern.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CHS-HCVI86 2CHS-LCVL ] 582CHS-MOVB132AXXXX Sheet t3 of 2L2ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t:S(;lNlil:RS N (:O:tsl il.1A:{fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.AXLB 718718Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources,7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:i.+4. .'.1'Eddie M. GuerraDate:Date:Status:N/AN/Ar0n0l20r2t0lt0l20l2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associate$r Inc,ENG TNEERS Sr CONSULI'ANI $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L4 of z1,zURoomFloor El.AXLB 718718Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-3-3-02.1pegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: I -60-3-3-02jpegDescription: General view of area ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Irtc.t N(;lN[].RS Ai C()t{Sl_:[-l"AN TliArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 718Status: @NSheet L5 of 2L2URoomFloor El.718Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l -65-3 -3-02jpegDescription: View of scaffold in the areaSEIP-"-File Name : l -66-3-3-02jpegDescription: Tag for seismic requirements for nearby scaffold pce lraul c. ltizzo Ass.ciate+ l'c.I \(;lNIitRS & C()Nst.'1.1Al--l':Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room755AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping ond conduits in the area werefound to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CHS-SOV2O62CHS-TK2IASheet LG of 2t2Status:@Bldg.XXYYN/AYN/AXx []aul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.t NclNlf,RS {r C()NSI:ll'rlSlsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room755Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse selsmlcinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliStatus:@t0lr0l20l2Sheet L7 of 2L2UUN/AUN/AUN/ANBldg. AXLBNYNYNYUNY. .lI1t ./'--l T*q, /.1Date:Date:t0n0l2012XX XX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t'n-G INE ERS & L-ONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 18 of 2t2URoomFloor El.755AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK RoomBldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Description: General view of Boric Acid Tank RoomFile Name: I -60-4-3-04jpegDescription: View of Boric Acid Tank and attached linesFile Name: l-59-4-3-04jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,FNG INEERS & CONSUUTA}NTArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK RoomFloor El.755Status: @Bldg.AXLBDescription: Piping in the area identified to be rigidly supported.Sheet 19 of 2L2UFile Name: l-65-4-3-04jpeg t N(;lNltRS & (:0r-SL:1:I'.{Nl SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.AXLB 755-MCC Room755Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Duct andJ'an located in the room identified to be rigidly supported.Sheet 2O of 2L2N/ANiA4. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions with other equipmentlightingfof potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVP-CLC265AMCC-2-EO3XXXX pCe Iraul c. llizzo Asstrciatcs, l'c.t:li(llNtitlRS Ar {:t}NSI-;IIA}- fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.AXLB 755-MCC Room755Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporury installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra2L of 2L2N/AN/At0/10/2012tDll0l20l2SheetXXXXDate:Date: Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.En*G INEE RS & CONSULTAIIT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @AXLB 755-MCC RoomBldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-3-3-04 jpegDescription: Genral view of MCC RoomSheet 22 of 212URoomFloor El.755File Name: l -60-3-3-04 jpegDescription: Nearby AC unit identified to be properly supported. pOe Paul C. Itizzo Associates, I'c.Iti(ilNfF_Rs e. t-()Nst tTA)l-l'sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.AXLB 773 Suree Tank773Bldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Steel platform identified in the area to be in good condition. Wall mounted pipingsupports ond transmitters identified to be rigidly supported.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-TK21ANYNYNYNXXXX Paul C. Riezo Associatcs, [nc.AreaRoomFloortrNClNtrfiRS {i C(}s"$l;t:Il{r-'f SWalk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB 773 Surge Tank773Bldg.AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identdied regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraEl.Date:Date:Sheet 24 of 2L2N/AN/A10110/2012r0lt0l2012X X XX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,r:NGTNEERS & CONSUUTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 25 of 2L2URoomFloor El.773Status: @AXLB 773 Surge TankBldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3-05jpegDescription: View of several small pipes with adequate wall supportsFile Name: l-60-2-3-05 jpegDescription: General view of steel box sections used for pipe support and bracing Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Ei.*G INE E RS &. CONSU TTANITArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 26 of 2L2URoomFloor El.AXLB 773 Surge Tank773Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-65-2-3-05 jpegDescription: General view of Surge Tank PCe llaul C. ltiez' Ass*ciates, [nc.I N(;lN[f R5 Lt CONSI.:l:1",{N15Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB-CP-735@Sheet 27 of 2L2N/ANiAN/ARoomFloor El,Bldg.735AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items' Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping in the area was.found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions with other equipmentlighting)?of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area:2CHS-P2]AXXXX Faul C. Itizzo Associatcs. Inc.I S(;lti[liRs G Lt()Ntt'I:lA:.-'f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding/ire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by:AXLB-CP-735735Bldg.*;--' -- / / ., '.,L' '-t l.at'- ,,{ !" ,rt' i...*- "* . \!Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:28 of 2L2N/At0tr0l2012t0lr0l20l2YXYXYXYx Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCTNEERS & CONSI*II;TA]VITArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AXLB-CP-735Status:@Sheet 29 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.735Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-4-3-03 jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-4-3-03 jpegDescription: View of ceiling and lighting fixtures PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I'c.f: :.-(; lh\[ t_ RS & CO NS I ; l]',\:i'ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Batterv Room 2-lFloor El. 730Bldg. SRVBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet 3O of 2L2Status: @ N Ul. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Small AC unit identified to be tightly strapped to wall and judged not a potential.forinteraction.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Lighting.fixtures in the room judged ok.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:BAT-2-IYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AX 3t of 2L2Iraul C. Rizzlr Associatcs, lnc.AreaRoomFloorts{ilNttRs & rti)Nst:t:t:{: tsWalk-By Checklist (AWC)Battery Room 2-lBldg.SRVBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a ftre in the area?No c oncerns identdied re garding -fire s our c es.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)730El.Evaluated by:,-i-:..: ,/- r/ )"r _ .'.,;t'rt4jr{-" ," iBrian A. Lucarelli" l't ./-.f -\:-1- ,-fu*-+J tEddie M. GuerraXXN/AN/At0ll0l20r2r0lr0l2012XX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,ENC INEERS &. CONSUUTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 32 of 2L2URoomFloor El.730Battery Room 2-1Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-l-3-30jpgDescription: General view of area lraul C, Ilizzo Associates, lnc.IIljcINEtRS {i t\lNSt jtll:.1}i'l'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.CNTB 707707CNTBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Several cabinets opened and found in acceptable condition. Floor tiles were liftedand no missing anchors were identi.fied.for cabinet's base configuration.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays identified to be rigidly supported.@Sheet 33 of 2L2N/ANiAN/AN/ABldg.4. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions with other equipmentlighting)?of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area: PNL-2RPU-A RK-2AUX-REL-C RK-2PRI-PROC-] RK-2PRI-PROC-2 RK-2SEC-PROC-AXXX X SheetIraul C. Rizzo Asstrciates. lnc.t NCINITURS (A (:ONstil1.1\lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identi/ied regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by:CNTB 707707Bldg./i,)+r.'.- / /.. I',. _ -='r_/f,I,""i (Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraStatus:N/AN/AtOlr0l20r2r0tI0l20r2XXXX Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,F NC TNEERS &" C0NSL;lT.*ri-'l :iArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NSheet 35 of 2L2URoomFloor El.CNTB 707707Bldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-5-3-06 jpegDescription: View of cabinet arrangement in the area and lighting fixturesFile Name: l-60-5-3-06jpegDescription: Tag ID for cabinet opened for inside inspectionI -59-5-3-06 jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG TNEERS &. LX)NSTiUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 36 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.CNTB 707707Bldg.CNTBFile Name: l-65-5-3-06jpegDescription: General view of opened cabinetI -65-5-3-06 jpeg pce lraul c. ltizzo Associatss' I*c.t' S{llNhERS \\ (loNtt:t1.,\}- I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTB 707 SW Corner@Sheet 37 of 2L2N/AN/AN/ARoomFloor El.707Bldg.CNTBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and f,rndings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Wall and.floor mounted panels in the area were identi/ied to be in good condition.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and conduits in the areo were /bund to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:PNL-VITBS2-]AXXXX pce lraul c. ltizz' Associatcs, l'c.t ti{;lN[tRs {t coNst't:ri}iltArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTB 707 SW CornerRoomFloor El.707Bldg.CNTBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identiJied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No c onc erns ident ifi ed regarding .fir e s ourc es.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Cart near cabinets was identified to be securelv restrained.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraM"-frDate:Date:Sheet 38 of 2L2Status:N/AN/AN/At0lr0l2012 r0lr0l20r2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'G INEE RS &. CI)NSUIjTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 39 of 2L2URoomFloor El.707Status:oCNTB 707 SW CornerBldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Description: South-west area with wall mounted panelsFile Name: l-60-4-3-06jpegDescription: View of maintenance equipment properly tight to center columnFile Name: l-59-4-3-06jpeg Paul C. Rizao Associatesr Inc,ENG INEERS & CONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room CNTB 707 SW CornerStatus: @Bldg.CNTBFile Name: l-65-4-3-06jpegDescription: View of cart with locked wheels located near cabinetsSheet 4O of 212UFloor El.707 Paul C. Ilizzo Associates, lnc.t r.-{.;tNFf:RS ti (l()NSt:lT.{\ ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.CNTB 735-AC Room735Bldg.CNTBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Wall mounted instruments were identified to be in good condition and adequatelyanchored.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?All piping and conduits are well supported in this area.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVC-ACU2O ] A@Sheet 4L of 2L2N/AN/AN/AYXXXX pc'\e Ilaul c. Ilizz. Ass.ciates, l'c.I lictNF [Rs s (:{)Nlt.:tll'.{N[sWalk-By Checklist (AWC)CNTB 735-AC RoomAreaRoomFloor73sBldg.CNTBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a frre in the arca?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraEl.Date:Date:Sheet 42of2L2N/AN/AN/At0lt0l2012r0lr0l20r2XXXX Paul C. Rizro Associatesr Lnc.f,T$G INEER$ &. CONSULTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@File Name: l-60-2-3-07 jpegDescription: General view of component 2HVC-ACU201ANSheet 43 of 2L2URoomFloor El.73sCNTB 735-AC RoomBldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l -59-2-3-07 jpegDescription: View of attached lines on HVAC unitr-59-2-3-07 jpeg Itaul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc.INGINEE RS 6[ CONSL; I.:tAi{I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NBldg.CNTBFile Name: l -65-2-3-07 jpegDescription: View of small diameter piping rigidly supported from wallSheet 44 of 2LZURoomFloor El.CNTB 735-AC Room735r-65-2-3-07 jpee PCe Faul c. ltizzo Associates, l'c.t r-illNfliltS r\ C()NS[:[1-.{\'ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.Control BLDG MCC707Bldg.CNTBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Control panel identified with protective glass to cover.from potential .falling objects.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and conduits in the area were./bund lo be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Lightingfixtures above control panel were identi/ied to be properly restrained.Judged not to present a potential interaction concern.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:MCC-2-E09XSheet 45 of 2L2N/AN/AXXX PCe lraul C. llirz. Asstrciates, ['c.f 5( ;INFERS .\ t\,rNlt'tI -{\1tArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Control BLDG MCCFloor El.707Bldg.CNTBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 46 of 212Evaluated bv:.,.-o1?*: .- / ,/ ,: i- ---., r--i -t"l\_ ."'. 1.,,t./-. I,_.,..{Brian A. LucarelliStatus:t0tr0l2012_F6.Date:Date:Eddie M. Guerrat0n0l2012YXYXYXY X'tt ) ,;,, t,-4-4 -::-1-,th,"-<J .t Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F,N'GINEERS &. CONSUTTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)\Status:@Sheet 47 of 2L2URoomFloor El.707Control BLDG MCCBldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: 1-59-3-3-06jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: I -60-3-3-06jpegDescription: View of control panel Itaul C. Rizzo Associatesr Lnc.t' N(;INEERS {i COn*Sl- ;l-TA}lf .tArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 48 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.Control BLDG MCC707Bldg.CNTBFile Name: I -65-3-3-06 jpegDescription: View of cabinet arrangement in the area pC? Paul Cl. Ilirz' As;ociates' Inc.tlN(;lNEtiRS {s C{lNSl ltf4N fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Control Room735Bldg.CNTBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Control room ceiling main runners are supported Jrom concrele ceiling by wires at-4'spacing. Each ceiling tile (i.e., egg grating) is tied to the main runners at each o.fits Jbur corners and judged not to be a potential.falling hazard. Potential ceilinginteraction with back panels judged not a concern as there are no sensitive relays inthese panels and the interaction is judged to be unlikely.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVR-TI2282HVR-T[228-12RSS-TI] 5OAPNL-2BLG-^gER PNL-VITBS2-2CRK-2UNC-INSX@Sheet 49of2L2N/AN/AYYYYXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I]i{ctNFttRs s ai)Nstil :I.{N rsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Control Room735Bldg.CNTBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the arca?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporcry installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Step ladder adjacent to radiation monitor instrumentation panel. Judged not aconcern as the panel is marked non-seismically related.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?One of the doors./br panel PNL-2FAL-REC can not positively be latched. Judged nota concern as there are no relays in this 3- panel line up.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Brian A. LucarelliDate:Eddie M. GuerraDate:Sheet 5O of 2L2Status:r0n0l20r2t0ll0l20r2X XXX Paul C. Rizeo Associatesr l,nc.E}$GINEERS & CONSuuTAIil$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NSheet 5L of 2L2URoomFloor El.Control Room73sBldg.CNTBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: Control_Rm( I )jpgDescription: View of panel PNL-2FAL-REC was not positively latched. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F;T\'G IN EF.RS & CONSI IITANI'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Control RoomStatus:@Sheet 52 of 2t2URoomFloor El.735Bldg.CNTBFile Name: Control_Rm(3fpgDescription: Step ladder located next to cabinetFile Name: Control_Rm(4fpgDescription: View of cabinet in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS (t T]ONSU UTAXTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NBldg.CNTBFile Name: Control_Rm(sfpgDescription: View of control room ceiling and the back panelsFile Name: Control_Rm(6XpgDescription: General view of ceiling grates.Sheet 53 of 2L2URoomFloor El.Control Room735 pce Iraul C. llizz' Associates, I'c.Is(llNf ERS & rlt)Ntl.llafirN"!.SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR755Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC ducts and cable trays in the area were.fbund to be rigidly supported.YSheet 54 of 2L2NiAN/AYYY4. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions with other equipmentlighting)?of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area:52_IBYA52 RTAXXXX pce- Paul C. Iliseo Assnciates, l'c.t \{llNFLRS r\ CONst-: uI.tN'rSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR755Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding Jire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 55 of 2L2XXXN/Ar0lt0l20r2r0n0l20l2XEvaluated bv:,-.'j.' ' / ..t",'tl -...r?' ,'?-'t' i I.',,.L \Brian A. LuclreliGuerra Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS 6r LX)NSLI LTAh-TSArea Walk-By Checklist (A\ryC)Sheet 55 of 2L2URoomFloor El.755Status: @CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGRBldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3- I 5 jpegDescription: General view of cabinets in the area and lighting fixturesFile Name: l-60-2-3-15 jpegDescription: View of conduits and cable trays in the area. pce lraul c. Itizzo Asrtrciates, l'c.l: \-$ lN f f R5 & (:( )NSt ; lif-.ts"lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.EDG 2-I732Bldg.DGBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?(moderate rust at yoke to bonnet of valve 2SWS-MOVI 13A. Re./br to SeismicWalkdown Checklists, Sheet 336 o.f 513 .for this component SWC and thecorresponding CR).3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and ducts in the area are rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2EGF-LIS2O3A2EGF-P21A 2EGF-TK22A2EGS-EG2-] 2STI/S-MOVI l3AMCC-2-EO7PNL-2DIGEN-]XSheet 57 of 2L2N/AXXX Paul C. Rizzo As:ociates. [nc.[ :\'{',lNf IRS & ()(lN\l : t]t n]..'f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.EDG 2-1'732DGBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No.flooding concern identiJied in this ares.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Bldg.Evaluated by:,,'i=: .: ,/1/,, ,/-( - .r'-'r/ r,,.*-- i (Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:YXYXYXYXr0n0t2012t0lt0l20r2 Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc.ENGTNEERS 6{ C$TNSLiLTANI SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.DGBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Description: General view of area showing pipe bracing membersSheet 59 of 2L2URoomFloor El.EDG 2-I 732File Name: EDG2-l(lXpgFile Name: EDG2-l(2XpgDescription: General view of cabinets in the area and lighting fixtures Paul C. Rizzo Ausociates, Inc,ENGTNEERS & (.-ONSTIUI ANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 5O of 2L2URoomFloor El.EDG 2-I732Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2-I(3XpgDescription: View of fire extinguisher in the areaFile Name: EDG2-l(4XpgDescription: View of nearby restrained cabinet RArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NBldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2-l (5) jpgDescription: Properly restrained ladder identified in the areaFile Name: EDG2- I (6)jpeDescription: View of scaffold located next to Diesel GeneratorSheet 6L of 2L2URoomFloor El.EDG 2-I732 R Paul c. Rizzo Ass*ciates, l'c.INGINF ERS t\, C()NSI :tl A]i t 5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)EDG 2-IStatus:@Sheet 62 of 2t2UNRoomFloor El.732Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2- I (7) jpgDescription: View of restrained ladder in the areaFile Name: EDG2- I (8) jpgDescription: View of restrained ladder in the areaEDG2- I (7) jpe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc'ENGTNEERS &. CONSULTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)EDG 2-1Status: @Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2-l(9XpgDescription: View of lighting fixture with missing fluorescent tube.Sheet 63 of 2L2URoomFloor El.732EDG2-l(e[pe Ilaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I,]((]INI IRS {i (.-ON*S[.:I:lA}-. fiArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.EDG 2-l Upstairs759Bldg.DGBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?DG mffier wqs identified to be rigidly supported. Emergency DG ground resistoridentified to be mounted on 4 porcelain supports. Since this equipment is only usedfor periodic testing and is not CAT l, it is judged to be adequate and not to present aseismic concern.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g,, ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVD-DMP20lA2HVD-DMP22A2HVD-FN27OAYSheet 64 of 2t2N/AN/AN/AYXXXX Sheet 65 of 2L2['aul C. ltizzo Associates, Inc.t'NtltN tl ERS {i CLrr*51 : t:I A-\1-SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.EDG 2-l Upstairs7s9Bldg.DGBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:, -] - /./ i'II _ -...rrr"-.fi,/^-- i_ (-{Brian A. Lucarelli-=__=,,:v/ {L,l'*_/,---- *ffi6/,, ./r, h.haj: . aEddie M. GuerraDate:XXXN/Ar0lr0l20r2t0lr0l2012X Itatrl C, ll'i;;o r\ssrrci.rtcs, Ittr.l\{'lNlll{1 ,\ ( (t\\l ll\\l\Status: @Sheet 66 of 2L2UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)NRoomFloor El.759EDG 2-l UpstairsBldg.DGBXOther supporting or rclcvant documcnts and photos (if any):Filc Nanre: EDG2-l_Up( I ).jpgDescription: Vicw of clcctrical equipment properly braced in the areaFilc Nanrc: EDG2- IDescription: Gcncral_ up(z).jpevicw of DG exhaust muffler PCe l'aul C. lliri* Ass'ti.tcs, l.r:.I \(,lNII ll'!,\ ( (\N\t ll'\}-'l\Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoornFloor El.Status:@Sheet 67 of 2L2UNEDG 2-l Upstairs7s9Bldg.DGBXFile Name:Description:EDG2- l_up(3).jpeGeneral vicw of areaFilc Name:Description:EDG2- l_Up(a) jpeGeneral vicw of area Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc.T. NGINETRS 6i C0N$LIL:TA,NT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)EDG 2-I UpstairsStatus' @NSheet 68 of 2L2URoomFloor El.7s9Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2- I _Up(5[pgDescription: Properly restrained ladder identified in the areaFile Name: EDG2-l_Up(6XpgDescription: View of DG ground resistorEDG2-l_Up(s[pe Paul C. Rigzo Associates. Inc.ENGINEERS {K CONSL:ITANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Sheet 69 of 2L2URoomFloor El.EDG 2-l Upstairs7s9Bldg.DGBXFile Name: EDG2- l_Up(7).SpeDescription: DG resistor tag ID Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.I.I:..CINEIRS & CONST :tll tN't SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)YSheet 7O of 2L2N/AN/AN/ARoomFloor El.Emerg SWGR AESRVBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduits, ducts and cable trays are identi/ied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Fluorescent light Jixtures are hung from chains to ceiling and their swing in a seismicevent could potentially hit top o/'the I7 panel line-up. CR-201 2-14463 was issued toaddress this situation.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:4BOVUS-2-84KVS-2AEBAT-CHG2-1BAT-CHG2-3DC-SWBD2-]PNL DC2-07PNL DC2-19PNL-SEQ-244TRF-2-8NUPS-VITB52-1UPS-VITB52- ] -REG730Bldg.YYYYXXXX pOa Paul C. ltiezo Associates, ['c.Fri(;lNF tr RS & LlOr-St :l:f AliISWalk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR AEAreaRoomFloorStatus:El.730Bldg.SRVBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverseinteractions that could cause a fire in the arca?No concerns identi/ied regarding Jire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporury installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)selsmlcEvaluated by:,F - .//,)r :lfi,i r+./_"r, (-{Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:X XN/AN/A101r012012t0lt0l2012XX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,ENC INEERS dc. C0NSLiLTTINTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet 72 of 2L2URoomFloor El.730Status:Emerg SWGR AEBldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: SWGR AE(lXpgDescription: General view of areaFile Name: SWGR AE(2)jpgDescription: General view of lighting fixtures and top cabinet conduitsSWGR AE(2)jpg PCe l'a rrt c. ltizie, Assot-ir,.,::--b-...:I \t;lNI'lrlls S. ( ()Nsl ll.\\lSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Status:YSheet 73 of 2L2U@Emerg SWGR AE730Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR AE(3).jpgDescription: Fire extinguisher located in the areaFilc Namc: SWGR AE(4).jpgDescription: Storagc box located in the area.SWGR AE(3).jpe Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.I' N(';INEIRS Ai CONSI-ILTAN"I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR AEStatus: Y@Sheet 74 of 2L2URoomFloor El.730Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR AE(s)jpgDescription: Properly restrained ladder identified in the areaFile Name: SWGR AE(6)jpgDescription: View of ceiling conduits and lighting fixtures Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,ENTi INEERS & CONSUUTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR AEStatus:Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR AE(7)jpgDescription: Hanging light located close to cabinet.Interaction addressed in CR-20 12-14463@Sheet 75 of 2L2URoomFloor El.730 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I\I;INEERS {r tl(}Nstilll Sl-!Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet 76 ot 2L2N/AN/AN/AN/ARoomFloor El.Emerg SWGR DF730SRVBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and ducts in the area were identiJied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:4BOVUS-2-94KVS-2DFBldg.XXXX Sheet 77 of 2L2Paul C. Rizzo Asstrciates. Inc.rN{;lNFlF.Rs $ l.oNslj I I'..riqrtArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Emerg SWGR DFBldg.SRVBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffoldrng, lead shielding)?I.5" diameter loops oJ'cable is mounted on the side of'BAT-CHG2-9 and may interactwith panel. This is judged not a concern since the charger is for maintenancepurposes only.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliDate:Eddie M. GuerraDate:730r0n0Darzt0n0l20l2YXN/AN/AY XYXYX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.T NGINEERS {\ CONSUITA}i-TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 78 of 2t2URoomFloor El.730Status' @NEmerg SWGR DFBldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: SWGR_DF(I )jpgDescription: General view of electrical equipment in the areaFile Name: SWGR_DF(2XpgDescription: General view of cabinets and lighting fixtures ltaul C. Rizzo Associatesr lnc.t.li( llNt ERS A( 1'11l\;\t:l:l ..\N I5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR DFStatus: @NSheet 79 of 2L2URoomFloor El.730Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR_DF(3)jpgDescription: View of cable trays above electrical cabinetsFile Name: SWGR_DF(4)jpgDescription: Storage carts and ladders locatedidentified to be properly secured.in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & CONSU I.TANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 8O of 2L2URoomFloor El.Emerg SWGR DF730Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR_DF(5XpgDescription: Fire hose located in the areaFile Name: SWGR_DF(6)jpgDescription: Fire extinguisher located in the atea Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI\$INEERS &. CON$t-r' LTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Emerg SWGR DFStatus:@Sheet 8L of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.730Bldg.SRVBFile Name: SWGR_DF(7).ipeDescription: View of I .5" diameter loops of cablemounted on the side of BAT -CHG2-9 Faul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.FS{ lll,iFERS A; {:C}NSI'ITA\-I-SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.FULB 729 PMP Room729Bldg.FULBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FNC-1082FNC-EJM23OA2FNC-P2]AYSheet 82 of 2L2N/AN/AN/AYXXXX pOe Paul C. Itizao Ass'ciates, I'c.t:rctNEF_RS {i C()NSt jIT.{\1SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.FULB 729 PMP Room729Bldg.FULBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 83 of 2L2XXN/AtDlt0l20l2t011012012XXEvaluated by:,.2'1-: -- ,/ ./ ,-t't 't'-:.-T, ,*'i'- .ri i\ - --i.'t.,-;,1-.-.{Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date: Paul C. Rizzo Associatesp Inc,ENGINEERS & CONSLfuTA}ETSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 84 of 2L2URoomFloor El.729Status: @NFULB 729 PMP RoomBldg.FULBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-3-3-29.1pegDescription: Overall view of pumps in the areaFile Name: I -60-3-3-29.1pe9Description: Ladder in the area identified to be properly restrained. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUITA}ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.FULBFile Name: I -65-3-3-29.1pegDescription: View of pipe lines attached to pumps in the areaSheet 85 of 2L2URoomFloor El.FULB 729 PMP Room729 ltaul C. llizzo A:sociates, Inc.Fr*(;lNE [.RS {i C(}NS l-: I 1 A}'-'! 5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 86 of 212N/AN/AN/AN/ARoomFloor El.FULB 741HX RoomBldg.FULBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment indegraded conditions?the area appear to be free of significant3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and piping in the area.found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FNC-82]A2FNC-RVIOl2FNC-TIIO]A 2FNC-TIIO2A741XXXX Sheet 87 of 2L2ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[\(;lN[ERS & c()Nsl'tT,{\tsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Interaction EffectsFULB 741HX RoomFULB5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:741Bldg.*_::zJ ,,U -=f o-_--* --vffi/,,. /* /d*q,J (Eddie M. GuerraStatus:r0lr0l20l2r0tr0l20r2XX XX Itaul C. Rigzo Associates, Inc.I,NCINEERS & (UNST;LII A\N 5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 88 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.741FULB 741 HX RoomBldg.FULBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name : l -59-2-3-29.1pe9Description: General view of Heat ExchangersFile Name : l -60-2-3-29.jpegDescription: View of cable trays in the areal -60-2-3-29.jpes Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGIN EERS & (X)NSUUTfu\TTlArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.FULBFile Name: l-65-2-3-29.jpegDescription: View of Heat Exchanger mounted on saddle supportsFile Name: l -66-2-3-29.jpegDescription: Nearby floor mounted pipe supports.Sheet 89 of 2t2URoomFloor El.741FULB 741 HX Room pCe Paul c. Rizz' Associates, ['c.I NCtNIitrRS e c0Nst'tTa\'] sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.IAC Room 773Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Wall mounted panels and instrument panels in the area were identified to be in goodcondition. Unit heater and instrument air tank were identdied to be good condition.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping in the area was identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-MOV] ]9XStatus:@Sheet 9O of 212N/AN/AYYYYXXX PC\e l3 Hl n"u:u t*;,',;*t*.'." t "Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 9L of 2L2RoomFloor El.IAC Room773Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?No Jlooding concern identiJied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fre in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraXStatus:N/AN/At0/10/2012t0lt0l20r2XXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,F,NG IN E ERS & C{)NSLI LTAIIITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 92 of 2t2URoomFloor El.IAC Room773Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-5-3- l6 jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: I -60-5-3-l6jpegDescription: Fire extinguisher and floor mounted supports for room pipe lines. Paul C. Ilizzo Associates. Inc.tr}i( ;INEERS {i C(lNSt.rl T..{SI5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 93 of 2L2N/ARoomFloor El.Intake Cubicle C70sBldg.TNTSInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Sur/'ace rust noticed on most oJ'12-7/8" diameter machine bolts attaching pump 2SWS-P21B to base plate. Judged not to present a signi/icant structural concern.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVW-FN257A2SWS-EJM221A 2SWS-PCVl ]8XXXX [raul C. ltizzo Associates. lnc.f \t;llirt_Rs & c(,rl,]tl :t'I '{st rArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)INTS5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)RoomFloor El.Interaction EffectsEvaluated by:Intake Cubicle C705Bldg.{*:*}.,,,,,{#Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:Sheet 94 of 212Status:N/A N/AN/AtOt1012012t0il0t20r2X X XX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,E\rc T NEERS &. CONSLI IJTAI*T$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 95 of 2L2URoomFloor El.705Intake Cubicle CBldg.Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: INTK_CUB_C( I XpgDescription: General view of areaFile Name: INTK_CUB_C(2).Sp9Description: Scaffold identified in the area R Paul c. Riezo Associates' [*c.FNGINE ERS rt CONSL:LTA}i]'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Status: @NSheet 95 of 2L2UIntake Cubicle C70sBldg.INTSFile Name: INTK_CUB_C(3)jpgDescription: General view of areaFile Name : INTK_CUB_C(4XpgDescription: Surface rust identified on small pipe support. Paul C. Riz,zo Associates; Inc.ENG INEERS & COhXSUUTA}ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Intake Cubicle CStatus: @Bldg.INTSFile Name: INTK_CUB_C(5XpgDescription: Surface rust identified on bolts for Pump 2SWS-P2lB.Sheet 97 of 2L2UFloor El.705File Name: INTK CUB _C(6)jpgDescription: Surface rust identified on bolts for Pump 2SWS-P218. Itaul C. Rizzer Associates, lnc.t:{(]lNEtrRS r\. CO:lSt."tT.{}i l SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)oSheet 98 of 2L2N/AN/AN/ARoomFloor El.Intake Cubicle D705Bldg.INTSInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Fuel oil tank identified to be adequately anchored. Unit heaters were identified to berigidly supported. Fire pump in the area identi/ied to be adequately anchored.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVW-MOD2 ]A2SWS-572SWS-P71A2SWS-PT-] I7AMCC-2-EO]YYYYXXXX pCe Paul c. Itizzo Associates, l'c.Ii\clNFf R$ r\ (-0tsl:t:l.{}]'lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet 99 of 2L2Intake Cubicle D705Bldg.INTSInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identiJied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?Fuel oil in the area is considered the ignition source. Fuel oil tank identi/ied to beadequately anchored7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Temporary scaffold in the area was identi/ied to be well braced and judged not topresent an interaction concern with nearby components.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraDate:Date:XNiAN/AN/Ar0n0l20r2 t0lr0l20l2XXX RItaul C. Riu.zo Associates, Inc.IN(;IN TiERS {L CONSI" ; I I,{:\T5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet t0O of 2L2URoomFloor El.705Status: @NIntake Cubicle DBldg.INTSOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: INTK_CUB_D( I XpgDescription: View of expansion joint located on pipe attached toFile Name: INTK_CUB_D(2) jpgDescription: General view of instruments in the areavertical Pump 2SWS-P2 1A. Itaul C. Ris,zo Associatesr Inc.ti:\(;I N E ERS {I. CONST : lTA}i"IsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NBldg.TNTSFile Name: INTK_CUB_D(3XpgDescription: View of PVC pipe connected to vertical pump 2SWS-P2IB.Sheet LOL of 2L2URoomFloor El.Intake Cubicle D705 Paul C. Rizztr Associatcs, lnc.f.r\(;tNrtR5 & coNrtrll.uiTiArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Main Steam Room El778778Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Pipes, ducts and conduits in the oreo were identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FWS-HYV] 5742SVS-HCV]04@Sheet LOZ of 212N/AN/AN/AYYYYXXXx pC? I.,.g!-C, Itizz. Associates, l'c.l, N-(; lN E g R S {i CflNSl. ;llt.{\"ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Main Steam Room F'1778778Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:,i?" - / /'/'( - -:1., f "*', ',Brian A. LucarelliDate:Status:@tOlr0l20l2Sheet 103 of 212N/AN/AN/AEddie M. Guerrat0lt0l2012XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr fnc"EIV; INEERS &. COFTSULTfu\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:oSheet LO4 of 2L2U778Main Steam Room El778Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-6-3- l6 jpegDescription: General view of area PCe Paul C. ltizro Associatss' I'c.frli(llNEtrRS {i C()NSt:tTA\"l SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Main Steam Room EI789Status:@Sheet L05 of 2L2N/ANiARoomFloor El.789Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2MSS-AOVl OlA2MSS-SOVlO5AYYYYX XXX PCe Paul c. Itizzo Associates, I'c.f.St;lNF:ERS & C()NSI :II'ANISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Main Steam Room El789789Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this areo.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the arca'lNo concerns identi/i ed re garding .fire s ourc es.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)XSheet LO6 of 2L2N/AN/AXXXEvaluated bv:{r;:;*,{#Brian A. LucarelliDate:t0lr0l20l2Eddie M. GuerraDate:t0n0t20t2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS & CONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Sheet L07 of 2L2URoomFloor El.789Main Steam Room El 789Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-7 -3- I 6jpegDescription: General view of area PCe Paul c. Rizzs Associates, l*c.f N(;INFF-RS & C()NSU[:I."li-.tSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.Main Steam Room Upper Plat.773Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified,3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Pipes, ducts and conduits in the area were identi/ied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2MSS-SVlO]A2SVS-PCV]O]AXSheet 108 of 212N/AN/AN/AN/AXXX pceArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Main Steam Room Upper Plat.Sheet LO9 of 2L2Floor El.773Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No conc erns identi/i ed re garding .fir e s ourc es.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporury installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GuerraDate:Date:N/AN/AN/Ar0n0l20r2r0n0t20r2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG IN EERS & CONSTJUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet tLO of 2L2URoomFloor El.773Main Steam Room Upper Plat.Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-8-3-l6jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-8-3-l6jpegDescription: General view of area Paul C. Ilizzo Associates. Inc.t r*(;lhtF F.RS ti C{l NS l--: tT,{N"l SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet LtIof2l2N/AN/ARoomFloor El.MSCV 718718Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Several valves were identified with moderate surface corrosion: 2SWS-MOVI60,2SWS-MOV I 6 2 and 2 SWS- MOV I 5 2 - I . CR-20 I 2- I 4449, CR-20 I 2 - I 44 5 0 and CR-2012-14452 were issued to address these conditions. Valve 2SWS-MOVI61 is rathera heavy MOV that is attqched to bonnet with 4-3/8" diam bolts. These bolts aremoderately conoded. CR-2012-14455 issued to address tftis condition. Surface ruston valve 2BOC-AOV-I00Al judged not to be a concern.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-MOV150-12CVS-SOVIO22CVS-SOVI5lA2RCS-AOV I O lXXXX Paul C. Itizzo Associates, lnc.t \( ;lNFt_RS & rlClNSt:t:fASISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet t12 of 212N/AN/AN/ARoomFloor El.Evaluated by:MSCV 718718Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)t:E-{,,,,{{{Brian A. Lucarellit0n0l20l2;-.-ifulhI"{{rEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:t0lt0l20l2XXXX R l-aul c. Itizz' Associates, I'c"t N(;lNFlrRS & f()NSl :l:t Alil SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet LL3 of 2L2Status: Y@View of storage cart and waste drums in the area.These were identified to be properly secured.UMSCV 7I8718Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3- I 2.jpeeDescription: General view of areaFile Name:Description:t-60-2-3-t2jpeg Sheet tL4 of 2L2[taul C. Rirzo Associates, lnc.I lit;lNf Ilts &, ("ONSi l1AN"I5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:YU@RoomFloor El.MSCV 7I8718Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-65-2-3- l 2.jpegDescription: View of restrained storage cartFile Name: l-66-2-3- l 2.jpeeDescription: View of restrained container Paul C. Rizzo Amociates, Inc.F"I$GINEERS &. CENSU UTA TTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-67 -2-3-l2SpegDescription: View of large diameter pipesFile Name: l-68-2-3-l2jpegDescription: Surface rust identified for valve 2SWS-MOVI62.CR-2012-14450 issued for this finding.@Sheet tLS of 2L2URoomFloor El.MSCV 7I8718 Paul C. Riezo Associates, lnc.F,!\STNEE.RS & CONSU UTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-69-2-3-l2.1pegDescription: Deficiency tag identified for 2SWS-MOVl60.CR-2012-14449 issued for this situation.File Name: l-70-2-3-l2SpegDescription: Deficiency tag identified for 2SWS-MOVI52-1.CR-2012-14452 issued for this situation.@Sheet tl6 of 2L2URoomFloor El.MSCV 7I8718 Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,I,NGINEE RS & CONSl- : LT,{\T$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: YBldg.MSCVFile Name: l-7 l-z-3-l2SpegDescription: Corrosion identified on base of 2BDG-AOV100B1.Sheet LL7 of 2L2@uRoomFloor El.MSCV 7I8718l-72-2-3-tzjpegFile Name:Description:Corrosion identified on base of 2SWS-MOVl61. Bolts appearedto be undersi zed. CR-20 12-14455 was issued to address this situation. Paul C. RiEzo Associates, Inc.El{cIN F. ERS O q155t :tIA}rr$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-7 4-2-3-l2jpegDescription: 2BDG-AOV-100A identified with mild surface corrosion.File Name: l-7 5-2-3- I 2.jpeeDescription: Scaffold located in the areaSheet tL8 of 2L2URoomFloor El.MSCV 718718Judsed not a seismic concern. Pau[ C. Rizzo Aorociates, Inc,ENGINEERS & C0t ISUUrANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room MSCV 718Status:Bldg.MSCVFile Name: l-7 6-2-3-l2.1pegDescription: Tag and signature for scaffold meeting seismic requirements.Sheet L19 of 2L2UFloor El.718 pceArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.MSCV East 735735MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Fire hose station presents potential interaction with Panel 2PU-47. The panel is not aCAT I panel and the potential interaction was judged acceptable.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2RCS-PT44OBldg.YSheet LZO of 2L2N/AN/AN/AYYYXXXX pCe Paut Lr. Ilizzo Assrrciatcs, [nc.AreaRoom FloorIi5(;INFERS r\ Co*-tt :t:t.drvrsWalk-By Checklist (AWC)MSCV East 735735Bldg.MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet !2L of 2L2N/AN/AN/AEvaluated bv:,-+'" / ../ '/i _ --r:,--l,rr,f .? --l (Brian A. Lucarellit0lr0l20l2Eddie M. GuerraDate:Date:t0tr0l20l2El.X X XX ltaul C. Riz,zo Associatesr Inc.F. NC IN E E R S {! C0 n-SL; LTA:r*TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L22 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.73sMSCV East 735Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3- I 4jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-2-3- I 4jpegDescription: General view of area Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FliClNF ERS {* CONSI:LI..\:ft $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L23 of 2L2NURoomFloor El.MSCV East 735735Status:@Bldg.MSCVFile Name: 1 -65-2-3-1 4 jpegDescription: Fire hose station located near panel 2PU-47. Judged not a seismic concern PCe llaul c. ltizz. Associates, I'c.t.\( ; ln- [ F-RS r\ C0r"tt.' i 1,{NISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.MSCV WestStatus:@Sheet L24 of 2L2N/AN/AN/A735Bldg.MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdeeraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Fluorescent fixture chain could present potential for interaction with instrument rackin the orea. Judged non-damaging.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:MCC-2-EO5YYYYXXXX PCe lraul c. Rizao Associates, I'c.FI( ;ln*F EltS r\ C{)r-\t 1 T.{\'f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.MSCV West735MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)L25 of 2L2Evaluated bv:Status:@t0n0t20t2Bldg.NYNYNYNYEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:t0lt0l20l2XXXX, .]J---f^,rt'-4 /.-4 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS &" MI{iI'iUTAIYTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L26 of 2L2URoomFloor El.MSCV West735Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3- I 3 jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-2-3-13 jpegDescription: View of cable trays in the area pce Paul c. ltiszo Associates, ['c.tNC;tNFERS N C0l{S(r:tTA\ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.N-EAST 2 AXLB 73573sBldg.AXLBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?A north-south support on the discharge piping of the pump 2CCP-1 156 is not in place(2CCP-PSSP-3208) and eliminated per DCP- I 135. Similar support is in place for2CCP-I 157 is in place. Pipe stress calculation Jbr this piping wos reviewed and itwas confirmed that the deleted support is not modeled in the stress analysis.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Monorail identified with locked trolley. Judged not to present an interaction concern.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-2742CCP-42CCP-P2IAX@Sheet 127 of 2L7N/AN/AN/AN/AXXX PCe Paul C. Ili:zo Associates, l'c'I \GiNEI:RS r! C(]XS[ j t:t ASISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.N-EAST 2 AXLB 735735AXLBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identffied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Drums and maintenonce equipmentfound in the area to be properly secured.concernfor seismic interaction was identffied.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraNSheet 128 of 212UBldg.Status:@r0lr0l2012UN/AUN/AUN/ANYNYNYNoUNDate:Date:t0n0t20t2XxXX Paul C. Rizeo Associatesp Inc.ENGTNEERS & MhISUUTA}ITSArea \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L29 of 2L2URoomFloor El.735Status: @NN-EAST 2 AXLB 735Bldg.AXLBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-5-3-03jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-66-5-3-03jpegDescription: Trolley identified in the area to be securely restrainedI -66-5-3-03 jpeg PCa I'".,1 c. nr* 4*r:ll*,,-g::I \(;lNI:iltS & ( ()N\1 l -l AN I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)N.EAST 2 AXLB 735Sheet L3O of 2L2Status:@UNRoomFloor El.73sBldg.AXLBFile Name: l-67 -5-3-03 jpegDescription: General view of insulated pipe lines.File Name: I-68-5-3-03.jpegDescription: Restrained drums located in the area Paul C. Rizro Associates, Inc.E!$GINEERS & CONSULTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:ISheet 131 of 2L2URoomFloor El.N-EAST 2 AXLB 735735Bldg.AXLBFile Name: l-69-5-3-03 jpegDescription: Restrained storage cart located in the areaFile Name: l-7l-5-3-03 jpegDescription: View of fire lines in the area pce llaul C. Ilirz' Associates, Iuc.r I(;tNEERS e rr()\it:l :L1,1..'ItArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.@Sheet t32 of 212N/AN/ANiAN/ARSS CubicleBldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and conduits in the oreq were found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2QSS-MOVl0rA718YYYYXXXX pce Faul c. Itizzo Associates, I'c'[\clNFuRs & f(]Nsr :llnNl sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by:RSS CubicleSheet L33 of 2L2SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a frre in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)718Bldg..'{7:' '- -/./ ,: /( _ ,,l.,;f.ri_1. l,1IBrian A. Lucarellir0n0l20l2Eddie M. GuerraDate:Date:tLtr0l20l2YXY XYXN/AY X ltaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I:N(]INEERS & CONSI- i LTANI $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet t34 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.RSS Cubicle718Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-8 -3-23jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: I -60-8 -3-23jpegDescription: View of Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-PZLA.I -60-8-3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizro Associatecr Inc.ENGINEERS & C()NSUI;TA}*TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RSS CubicleStatus:@Sheet L35 of 2L2UFloor El.718Bldg.SFGBDescription: View of Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-PZlA.File Name: I -66-8-3-23jpegDescription: Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-PZlA plate ID.File Name: l-65-8-3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ET\GIN EERS & CONSLTLTA}ITsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L36 of 2L2URoomFloor El.RSS Cubicle718Bldg.SFGBFile Name: l-67 -8-3-23jpegDescription: Insulated line attached to 2RSS-P2lA. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t \*ctNFt Rs $ cfiNst:t:r,\NTsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)@Sheet L37 of 212N/ARoomFloor El.741SFGB 741 Cubicle ASFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Panels in the area ore well supported.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Ducts in the area identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FWE-FE]OIABldg.YYYN/AYXXXX PCe lranl c. [tirzo Associates, [*c't \-r;lNFtR$ {i c0Nst.:t:f.{N"lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.SFGB 741 Cubicle A741Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the arca?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:,':7::;*#{{Brian A. LucarelliStatus:@t0tr0/2012Sheet L38 of 212N/AN/A' u/'-Y--11-#eJ.(Date:Date:Eddie M. Guerrat0/10/2012X X XX Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc.EI\SINE ERS & C0NSUTTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 741 Cubicle AStatus: @Sheet 139 of zlzUFloor El.741Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -60-3-3-25jpegDescription: Scaffold identified in the area pce llaul C. Ilizzo Associatcs, l'c.tr l-{; lNFt RS & L:ONlit' I TA\-1..iArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomSFGB 741 Cubicle CFloor El. 741Sheet L4O of 2L2Status: @ N UBldg. SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Wall mounted instruments in the area are identified to be in good condition.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Ducts and conduits in the area are identiJied to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FWE-HCVLOODYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AX Ilaul C. Rizzt-r Associates, lnc.tl{;tNrf Rli & ('oNst:rtANISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 741 Cubicle CFloor El. 741Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identi/ied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the arca?Na concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffold in the area is well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:{tr;;-,Ht{Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:Sheetof 2t2Status:N/AN/Ar0lr0l20l2 r0/10t20t2XxXX Paul C. Riszo Associates, Inc.ENG TNEERS Cr COITISULTANTSArea \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 741 Cubicle CStatus:@Sheet L42 of 2t2UFloor El.74rBldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-60-4-3-25jpegDescription: Scaffold identified in the area PCe [)aul c. llizzo Associates, I'c.I )i(;INFtrRli {i C-C)NS[ ;LT.{}a f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet L43 of 2L2@SFGBSFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Surface rust identified at two support rods on suction nozzle to 2QSS-P2lA. Judgednot to present an adverse seismic condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Potential interaction between a light./ixture and 3/8" diam steam line. This is judgednot to be a concern. Fluorescent light tube over 2QSS-FIS-l0lA may potentiallydislodge and interact. This is judged credible but not signi/icant.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FWE-P222FWE-P23A 2SIS- ]2SIS-P2]A718Bldg.XXXX L44 of 2L2Paul C. Riezo Associates, Inc.I \(;INIIERS & rr()NSt:tT.{N tsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by:718SFGBStatus:@r0n0/2012SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?A support rod at discharge nozzle oJ'pump 2QSS-P2lA is not in place. A tag on thepost of this rod states deleted.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Bldg.NYNYNYN,'?l-- //:li' - rr-i', /ri: t,iIBrian A. Lucarellin1 / I'&/'/H"firEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:r0/1^0t2012XXXX Paul C. Riazo Associates, Inc.EIlG IN EERS & CONSULTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.SFGBFile Name: I -59-5-3-23jpegDescription: General view of fire line located in the area.File Name: I -60-5-3-23jpegDescription: General view of room's ceilingSheet 145 of 2L2URoomFloor El.SFGB718Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):I -59-5-3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizso Acsociater, Inc.EI{GINEERS & OS{Su TANTtArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 145 of zLzURoomFloor El.SFGB718Bldg.SFGBFile Name: I -65-5-3-23jpegDescription: Hanging light bearing on top of pipe.File Name: I -66-5-3-23jpegDescription: General view of area Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr lnc.IINGINEERS & CONSLitTA:fTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L47 of 2L2URoomFloor El.SFGB718Bldg.SFGBFile Name : l -67 -5-3-23jpegDescription: Mirror located above 2FWE-P234File Name : l -7 0-5-3-23jpegDescription: Potential falling of lightJudged not a significantStatus: @Nbulb could impact instrument below.interaction.t-67 -5-3-23jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC INEERS & L-ONSUUTI\}$TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.SFGBFile Name: I -68-5-4-23jpegDescription: View of deleted support rod for 2QSS-P?IA discharge nozzle.Sheet L48 of 2L2NURoomFloor El.SFGB718 L49 of 2L2Paul C. Rizzo Associates. lnc.t'NCINFERS r\ L]0NSLtf'AlYrSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.SFGB 718 UPBldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the areafound to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2OSS-MOVl OOA718NYNYNYNYXXXX pce Paul c. Itizzo Associates, [*c"tlSC;tNF ERq & t-0NSl-;LTrlNl5Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 718 UPFloor El. 718Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identffied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet LSO of 2L2N/AN/AEvaluated bv:,4:':: /r/,',:,t -,'r.'u/ )f *r:.{Brian A. Lucarellit0/r0t2012Eddie M. GuerraDate: Date:r0tr0t20t2XXXX pOe I'aul c. llizzo Associates, I.c.[\(]t NE:ERS t\ (_-ONSt rt'L{\1.\Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 718 UPFloor El.718 Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Sheet LSt of 2L2 pce Paul c. Itizzo Associates, I*c.t N$ lN Ff_ R 5 & ULINSI.:LT.{NISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SFGB 718 WestFloor El.@Sheet L52 of 2L2N/ASFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and conduits in the qrea wereJbund to be rigidly supported.718Bldg.N/AN/AN/A4. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions with other equipmentlighting)?of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area:2SIS-MOV\63A2SIS-MOV881]A2SWS-MOVIO4AXXXX PCe Paul c. Rizz' Associates, l'c.I NClNEF_R5 & e()NSt:t.T.{\'t sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet t53 of 2L2SFGB 718 WestStatus:@10tr0t20r2SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?ScalJbld in the area is well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:7r8Bldg.NYNYNYNYEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:t0n0t20t2XX XX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.INC INE,tsRs {\ CONST;LT.{NI.SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L54 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.SFGB 718 West718Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-7 -3-23jpegDescription: View of supports for piping in the areaFile Name: l -60-7 -3-23jpegDescription: General view of area PCe Paul C. Rizz' Associates, I*c.It((ilNF [.R5 r\ L-ONSI : tTAN.rSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.SFGB 737737Bldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:MCC-2-E I 1Sheet L55 of 212Status:YxNYNYNYNXXX pce llaul c. Ilizz' Associates, l*c.AreaRoomt N(;INI]F_R5 & L:ONSIIl:I'Alir$Walk-By Checklist (AWC)SFGB 737Floor El.737Bldg.SFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Noflooding concern identdied in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?A 55 gallon drum and one light weight shelve near MCC-2-E11 were identified to beunrestrained. Plant personnel were notified and the drum and shelving wereimmediately tied off. cR-2012-14420 issued to address this condition.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)XYSheet L56 of 2L2NiAN/AXXXEvaluated by:,-=;1.4/tt(Brian A. Lucarellit0n0t20t21ttlYJ-d'*-A /.4Eddie M. GuerraDate:t0lt0l20r2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUUTA}ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Sheet L57 of 2L2@uRoomFloor El.SFGB 737737Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3-24.1pegDescription: Maintenance equipment and unrestrained drums located in the areanear MCC. CR-2012-14420 issued to address the situation.File Name: l-60-2-3-24.1pegDescription: View of hanging lights in the area.l -60-2-3-24.jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & CC}NSU LTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Bldg.SFGBFile Name: l -65-2-3-24.1pegDescription: Notice label on top of unrestrained drum near MCC.Sheet L58 of 2L2URoomFloor El.SFGB 737737 pOe I'au[ c. Iliazo Associates, I*c.f Nt;lNEERS {l L-ONSIllTrl}'.'lSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet 759 of 2L2Status:@SFGB 741-PLATBldg.SFGBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2HVR-ACU207A741YYYN/AXXXX Faul C. Ilizzo Associatcs, lnc.f ST;II.iEERS N CONIUITANI'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet L6O of 2L2UStatus:@r0lr0l20r2NRoomFloor El.741SFGB 741-PLATSFGBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffold in the area is well braced. Temporary unrestrained step ladder.found in thearea judged not a seismic concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliDate:Eddie M. GuerraDate:Bldg.NYUN/AUNiANYUNYN/AUNYr0n0t20t2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)SFGB 741-PLATStatus: @Sheet LGL of 2L2U741Bldg.SFGBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3-25jpegDescription: Scaffold located in the areaFile Name:Description:Unrestrained ladder identified in the area.Judged not a seismic cqncern for nearby equipment.l-60-2-3-zsjpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t\(;INFI'RS & CONStrlT.dNl SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room SRVB 780Floor El.780Bldg.SRVBInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Blockwall identified in the area. Calculation 57.7 shows blockwall has beenreinforced to adequately sustain seismic effects.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2FWS-FCV47B2FWS-FCV479@Sheet L62 of 2L2N/AN/AXXXX pCe Paul C. ltizz' Associatcs, ['c.I \clN[trRS {i Ct)NsUtTrNfSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.SRVB 780780SRVBInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffolding located in the area was judged not to presenl an inleraction concern withnearby equipment.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)NSheet L63 of 2I2UBldg.Status:@t0tr0t20r2UN/AUN/AUN/ANYNYNYUNYEvaluated by:-.1< - I ,t ,. 7,/'tl=--' -,L-./t. '.,-l't,,/t.,*-{ t";tBrian A. Lucarelli/.-/"<---t'/t+-qJfDate:Date:Eddie M. Guerrar0n0t20t2XXXX R Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I*c.IINCINEERS Ar C()NSL,'LTANI $Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Status:@Sheet L54 of 2L2UNSRVB 780780Bldg.SRVBOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3-27 .1pegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-2-3-27 jpegDescription: General view of area Sheet L55 of 2L2ltaul C]. ltizzo Associatcs, lnc.[ \( ;lNF I:RS & (]t)ltsl ;l TA,\*l sArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NBldg.SRVBFile Name: l-65-2-3-27 jpegDescription: Scaffold identified in the ateaFile Name : l -66-2-3-27jpegDescription: Tag for seismic requirements for nearby scaffoldURoomFloor El.SRVB 780780 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI\G INEERS &" OONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet t66 of 2L2URoomFloor El.SRVB 780780Bldg.SRVBFile Name: l-67 -2-3-27 .1pegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-68-2-3-27 .1pegDescription: Block wall identified in the area PCe Paul c. Rizz' Associated, l'c.I i{{IINFERS & (-ONSI :lf _{}*TiArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomSWGR Vent Room 773Floor El. 773Blde. MSCVInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet t67 of 2L2Status: @ N U1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Fans and ducts in the area were.found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:7HVZ-DMP215A2HVZ-FN261A2HVZ-FN261BYNUN/A XYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.L:tClNEERs {! CONSTrlTAt*TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomSWGR Vent Room 773Floor El. 773Bldg. MSCVInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this areo.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Temporary housekeeping equipment identified in the area. Judged not to present aninteraction concern with nearby components.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet 168 of 2L2Status: @ N UYNUN/AXYNUNiA XYNUN/AXYNUXDate: l0ll0l20l2Date:l0n0t20L2Eddie M. Guerra Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN'GTNEERS 6c C0NSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L69 of 2L2URoomFloor El.773SWGR Vent Room 773Bldg.MSCVOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: 1-59-9-3- l6 jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-9-3-16jpegDescription: Equipment found in the area. Itaul C. Rizz,o Associatesr Inc.ENCINEERS & CONSTi LT.{N-TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L7O of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.SWGR Vent Room 773773Bldg.MSCVFile Name : l-66-9-3- I 6jpegDescription: General view of area PC\e Paul c. Rizz' Associates, I.c.h ]..C lN EE RS
- CoNiUtT,{\1-SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet !7L of 212Status:YValve Pit A7t8Bldg.VLVPInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in thedegraded conditions?area appear to be free of significantTag No. 63005 on valve 2SWS-MOV562 indicates that the valve has rust and needs tobe cleaned and painted. CR-2012-14412 issued to address this condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?All piping in the area is well supported. Unit heater identi/ied to be well supported.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2SWS-MOVl06A2SWS-PT-] ] 3ANYNYNYNXXXX Paul C. ltizzo Associates, Inc.1,r*{;lNFtRS & (-()Nit',lTA.}iTsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Valve Pit ABldg.VLVPInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the areaTComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Sheet L72 of 2L2UStatus:Yt0/1^0t20r2@718UNYUNYN/ANYN/AUN/AUNYEvaluated by:,'?=i,/,{+(Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:t0tr0t20t2X X
XX R Paul c. Rizro Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & COTTISUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Valve Pit AStatus:@Sheet L73 of 2L2UFloor El.7 r8 Bldg.VLVPOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: VLV_PT_A( I XpgDescription: General view of areaFile Name: VLV_PT_A(2)jpgDescription: General view of area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS &. C-ONSULTANISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y@Sheet L74 of 2t2URoomFloor El.Valve Pit A718Bldg.VLVPFile Name: VLV_PT_A(3)jpgDescription: Surface rust identified on severalMOVs in the area.File Name: VLV_PT_A(4)jpgDescription: Deficiency tag requesting cleanup and painting.CR-2012-14412 issued to address this finding. PC\e []aul C. Rizzo Associates, I'c.f \(;l N FERS & L'ONSI. I l_1.{i-TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.YardBldg.YARDInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Mild surface corrosion identified on several locations oround tank 2QSS-TK21. Thisis mostly due to humidity in the area. CR-2012-14744 and CR-2012-14749 wereissued to address moderate corrosion identified on valves.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and conduits in the areq were found to be rigidly supported.NYStatus:YSheet L75 of 2tZN/AN/ANYNNY4. Does it appear that the area is freeinteractions with other equipmentlighting)?of potentially adverse seismic spatialin the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andRelated equipment on SWEL for this area:2QSS-2e72oSS-LT104A 2QSS-TK2I730XXXX pce Paul c. [tizz. Associates, Inc.l: )ir;tN I S RS & CClNit i i T,{r*ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Yard730YARDInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?Noflooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffolding identified to be well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Bldg.@Sheet L76 of 2L2UNYNNYStafus:Yr0/10t2012UN/AUN/AUN/AUNYEvaluated by:ff:;#,,{,!1Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:r0n0t20t2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associateu, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSLILTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L77 of 2L2URoomFloor El.Yard730Bldg.YARDOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-65-4-3-29.1pe9Description: View of Tank 2QSS-TK2I.File Name: I -60-4 -3-29.;pegDescription: Scaffold located in the area. Itaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F NGTNF E RS S. C'ONSL: tTAr*fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:YSheet L78 of 2L2U@RoomFloor El.Yard730Bldg.YARDFile Name: l-66-4-3-29.1pegDescription: General view of areaFile Name : l-67 -4-3-29.jpegDescription: Scaffold located in the area.I-67 -4-3-29.jpeg Paul C. Riz,zo Associates, Inc.EhIGTNEERS & CONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Sheet L79 of 2L2URoomFloor El.Yard730Bldg.YARDFile Name: I -68-4-3-29.1pegDescription: General view of area pCe Ilaul c. Rizzo Associates, h'rc.RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle72rE\:Cl NFDRS (\ eONSl : I ]'As.-"l'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.Bldg.RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?No degraded conditions were identified.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and cable trays in the area were.fbund to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-AOVI OTANSheet L8O of 2L2UUNN/AN/AN/AUNYUNYNiAUNYXXXX PCe lraul c. Riszo Associates, I'c.I \."{ ;l Nf E RS {i {'0NSt : ]:I'.{i-'ISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Sheet t8L of 2L2UStatus:@t0lt0l20l2NRCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle721Bldg.RCBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?NoJlooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffolding located in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:NUNYNYUNiAN/AUN/AUNYEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:rutr0t20r2XXXX Paul C. Riszo Associateo, Inc,ENCINEERS E. CONSULTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet L82 of 2LzURoomFloor El.721RCBX 721-4 RCP Pump CubicleBldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-6-3-l9jpegDescription: View of scaffold in the areaFile Name: l-60-6-3-l9jpegDescription: View of pipe supports and cables hanging in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associatesr Inc,ENGINEER5 & CONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet t83 of 2L2URoomFloor El.721RCBX 721-A RCP Pump CubicleBldg.RCBXFile Name: l-65-6-3-19jpegDescription: View of scaffold in the areaI -6s-6-3- l9 jpeg PCe Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I'c.I li(; lNIl h RS (. !:ONSL: tll A*-"t SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@RoomFloor El.RCBX 718Bldg.RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the area werefound to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-FTIOTA2CCP-PT]O7ASheet L84 of 2L2U718NN/AUN/AUN/AUN/AUNYNNNYXXXX Itaul C'. Rizzo Associates, Inc.h :r-"c I n! F I R 5 & (.ONS[ i t:l'A]iISArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718Floor El. 718Bldg.RCBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Maintenance equipmentfound in the area to be properly restrained.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraNSheet L85 of 2L2UUNYNNYStatus:@r0lr0l2012N/AUN/AUN/AUNYDate:Date:r0lr0l2012XXXX Paul C. Riszo Associatesr Inc.ri.ruG INEERS &. CONSLiI.TANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet L86 of 2L2URoomFloor El.RCBX 718718 Bldg.RCBXother supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-3- l gjpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l-60-2-3- I gjpegDescription: View of maintenance equipment in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGTNEERS &. CONSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Bldg.RCBXFile Name: l-65-2-3- 19 jpegDescription: View of cable trays in the area.File Name: l-66-2-3- I 9jpegDescription: View of vertical cable trays properly supportedSheet L87 of 2L2URoomFloor El.RCBX 718718 PCe llaul c. Itizzo Associates, I'c.Sheet L88 of 2L2Status: @ N UIlli(ilN F:E RS &. CO NSLiI :1".*{f SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 7l8-AnnulusFloor El. 718Bldg. RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?lV'all mounted supports and instruments were.found in good condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CCP-MOV] 12A2FWS-LT477FYNUNiAXYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AX pce llaul c. Rizz' Ass'ciates, I'c.t\1; lNIt I RS & CONSl_; LTA]il:Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.Evaluated by:RCBX 718-AnnulusL89 of 2L2718 Bldg.RCBXStatus:@t0lr0l2012Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Maintenance carts in the area identified to be securelv locked.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)NYNYNYNY"-#;;_{{!:{Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:t0n0t20r2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSI.ILTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @RCBX 7l8-Annulus718 Bldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):Description: Temporary outage related maintenance equipmentFile Name: l-60-4-3-19jpegDescription: Temporary outage related maintenance equipmentSheet 190 of 2L2URoomFloor El.File Name: l-59-4-3-l 9jpeg pce Paul C. Rizzo A.ssociates, I*c.FNtl ls-[t RS &. CONSUl:I AN-I SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RCBX 692-Near Inner StairsStatus:@RoomFloor El.692Bldg.RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limitsf4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2CHS-MOV3I ONNYNYNYSheet L9t of 2L2XxXX I-)aul C. Ilizzo Associates, lnc.f.Nctn\[ERS & l{)Nst-:L:l A\TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs692Bldg.RCBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding.fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Heavy storqge boxes and scaffolding were identi/ied in the area. Judged not aninteraction concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Status:@l0lr0l2012Sheet L92UUN/AN/ANUNYNYUNYUNYEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:r0n0/2012XX XX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I-NGINEERS {i. CONSL]L.TA}.II SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet L93 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.692RCBX 692-Near Inner StairsBldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-4-3-17 .jpegDescription: View of heavy storage boxes in the area.File Name: I -60-4-3-17 .jpegDescription: Fire line located above 2CHS-MOV310 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ET.$GINEERS & CONSUUTANT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:Sheet 194 of zLzURoomFloor El.RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs692Bldg.RCBXFile Name: l-65-4-3-17 jpegDescription: View of scaffold in the area PCEArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9Sheet L95 of 2L2Status: @ N UFloor El. 718Bldg. RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?wall mounted supports and instruments were.found in good condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the area were.found to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2DAS-AOVl OOAYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUNiAX pce Paul C. Ilize. Associates, I'c.f NCINESRS & lONSI:11"tu\.15Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9Bldg.RCBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffold in the area is well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated bv:Brian A. Lucarelli-m41d,Eddie M. Guerra718NSheet L96 of 2L2UUNYNYStatus:@t0ll0l20r2N/AUN/AUN/ANYUNYDate:Date:r0tr0t20r2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EI\'G INE ERS & CONST.ILTA}ITSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9Floor El.718Status:@Sheet t97 of zlzUBldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-66-7 -3-l9jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l -67 -7 -3- I gjpegDescription: View of scaffold in the area pOe I'.g!-c. Ilizzo Asstrciates, I'c.[N.-(; tN E F.RS & r-ONSt i litAN'fSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.RCBX 707707Bldg.RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Mild surface corrosion identiJied on anchorage.for heat exchangers (2RHS-E2lA and2RHS-E2IB) and pump (2RHS-P2IA) in the area. Judged not to present an adversecondition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Rod hung supports found in adequate condition. Cabte trays in the area were Jbund tobe rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2RHS-E2IA2RHS-HCV758A2RHS-P2]A2RHS-RV721ASheet L98 of 212Status:@XNYNYNYNYxXX PCe Paul C. Rizzo Ass*ciates, ['c.ENCINFLRS {! C{)NST:ITAN] SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.RCBX 707707RCBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No./looding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Bldg.Sheet I99 of 2L2UStatus:@t0n0/20t2NUNYUNN/ANiANYUN/AUNYEvaluated by:.f;. '- ,/ -/.. /l - - .1.:,1,u,ri*,1,_-jr,(IBrian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraDate:Date:t0tr0t20t2XXxX Paul C. Riezo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & L-ONSULTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 20O of 2L2URoomFloor El.RCBX 707707Bldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: l-59-2-2-lSjpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: l -60-2-2-lSjpegDescription: View of sheet metal housing on 2RHS-E2lB and sulrounding piping. Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NSheet 2OL of 2L2URoomFloor El.RCBX 707707Bldg.RCBXFile Name: l-65-2-2- I 8 jpegDescription: View of well braced HVAC ducts in the areaFile Name: 2-63-3-2-lSjpegDescription: General view of Heat Exchanger 2RHS-E?IB Paul C. RiEro Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & CON$UITA}i'TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status:@Sheet 202 of 2L2UNRoomFloor El.RCBX 707707Bldg.RCBXFile Name: 2-64-3-2-lSjpegDescription: General view of ceiling rod hung supports PCe Paul C. Rizzo Ass'ciates, ['c.t,f,*t;lNFERs & C{lNSL;l i AN-I'SChecklist (AWC)RCBX 718-A RCP PumpArea Walk-ByRoomFloor El.718Status:Bldg.RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. 'space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays in the area were Jbund to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2RHS-MOV7O2ANYNYNYNY2O3 of 2L2XXXX pCe Iraul C. Itizzo Associatcs, ['c.RCBX 718-4 RCP PumpriNctNf tRs ti c()NsLtlANIsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomFloor El.718Bldg.RCBXInteraction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No Jlooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identffied regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?ScalJblding located in the area. Judged not to present an interqction concern.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliEddie M. GuerraStatus:@t0n0t20t2NYNYNYNYDate:Date:t0n0t20t22O4 of 2L2X XXX R Paul c. Rizzo Associates, I*c.FNG INEERS &. T]ONSTi I.:I A}VITArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RCBX 718-,4' RCP PumpStatus:@Sheet 205 of 2t2UNRoomFloor El.718Bldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-3-3- l9 jpegDescription: General view of areaFile Name: I -60-3-3-l9jpegDescription: View of scaffolding in the areaI -60-3-3-r9jpeg PCa [)aul c. Itizzo Associates, I.c.[ \{-ih- F F. R 5 r\ {-(,rNSU Ll ,\}i.lsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)RoomRCBX 718-Annulus Col 4Floor El. 718 Bldg. RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Sheet ZOG ot 2L2Status: @ N UI . Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Wall mounted supports for piping and cable trays were identified to be in goodcondition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2SIS-67YNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUNiAX PCe Paul c. Ilizzo Ass.ciates, 1*c.I:SGINFERS & (-ONST:LI A}iTSArea Watk-By Checklist (AWC)RCBX 718-Annulus Col4NSheet 2O7 of 2L2URoomFloor El.Interaction Effects718RCBX5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingJire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporury installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Nitrogen bottles and storage boxes were identified to be properly secured in the area.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the arca?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary){=;"4{t{Evaluated by:Brian A. LucarelliDate:Bldg.Status:@r0tr0t20t2UN/AUN/AUN/ANYNYNYUNYEddie M. GuerraDate:t0tt0t20r2XXXX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS & (UNSUUTANTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NSheet 208 of 212URoomFloor El.718RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4Bldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: I -59-5-3- l9 jpegDescription: General view of cable trays and fire line in the areaFile Name:Description:View of nitrogen bottles and storageboxes properly secured in the areaI -60-5-3- l9 jpeg Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & CONSUUTAI*TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @Sheet 209 of 2L2URoomFloor El.718RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4Bldg.RCBXFile Name: l-65-5-3-l9jpegDescription: Temporary outage related maintenance equipmentFile Name: l-66-5-3-l9jpegDescription: View of wall mounted supports for piping and cable trays. Paul C. ltizzo Associates, Inc.h-{lt NF tRs & coNst.:t:rA:-rsArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room RCBX 718-8 RCP PumpSheet ?LO of 2I2Status: @ N UFloor El. 718Bldg. RCBXInstructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Wall mounted supports for piping were identdied to be in good condition.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles andlighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area:2RHS-MOV72OAYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AXYNUN/AX Ilaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[r-C lN Fl E R S & r] O NSLi tl'Ar-I SArea Watk-By Checklist (AWC)NSheet ZtL of 2L2URoomFloor El.Interaction EffectsRCBX 718-8 RCP PumpRCBX5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffold in the area is well braced.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra718Bldg.Status:@t0/r0/2012UNiAN/AUN/ANYUNYNYUNDate:Date:r0/10t2012X XXX Ilaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc,[:NGINEIRS & CONSL]UI"AIVI SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: @NSheet 2L2 of 2L2URoomFloor El.718RCBX 718-8 RCP PumpBldg.RCBXOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):File Name: 2-61-5-2-19 jpegDescription: General view of 2RHS-MOV720AFile Name: 2-62-5-2-19.1pegDescription: View of scaffolding above 2RHS-MOV720A2-6r-5-2-19 jpeg2-62-5-2-t9.jpeg APPENDIX D: COMPONENT LIST FOR ANCHORAGECONFIGURATION CHECKComponent IDReferences2CCP-E2IADrawing 10080-RS-36J2CCP-FTIO7 ADrawins 12241 -BK- 16G-8-2F2CCP-P2IADrawins 12241 -RC-36P-92CCP-PT1O7ADrawing 12241-BK- 1 6G-8-2F}CCP-TK21ACalculation NM(B)-436-IA2CHS-PzIADrawing 10080-RC-36N and Drawine 10080-RC-36P2CHS-TK21ADrawing 2003.470-033-0 I I2EGF-TK22ADrawins 10080-RC-29 A and Drawine 10080-RC-29B2EGS-EGz-IDrawins 10080-RC-2982FNC-EZTADrawins I 0080-RC-0038K2FNC-PZTADrawing 1 0080-RC-0038K2FWE-P22Calculation I 2241-NM(B ) -67 8 -CZC2FWE-P23ADrawins 2002.400 -208 -028 and C alculat ron 2602. 400- 20 8 -03 5 C2HVD-FN2]OACalculation NM(B)-SZ l -CZC2HVZ-FN26IACalculation NM(B)-52 1 -CZC2HVZ-FN261BCalculation NM (B) - 521 -CZC2QSS-LT l04ADrawing 12241-BK- l6G-45-32RHS-E218Drawing 1 0080-ISI-E-2P2RHS-PzIADrawins 10880-RV-0052A2SIS-P21ADrawins 2002.290-00 I -0022SWS-PzIACalculation 73 I -N-00272SWS-PT-1134Drawing 12241 -BK- 1 6G- I7 -3K2SWS-PT-TT7 ADrawins 12241-RK-5J-2BAT-2-1Drawins 2001 .240-841 -034DC-SWBD2-IDrawins 200 1.260-3 50-030FMCC-2-EO1C alculation NM (B) - 468 -CZCMCC-2-E07C alcul at ron 12241 -NM (B ) - 468 -CZCMCC-2-El1Calculation I 224 I-NM(B ) -468-CZCPNL 2DIGEN-lCalculation I 2241-NM(B ) -438-CZCPNL DC2-07Drawin g 200 l .260 -363 -082LPNL DC2-19Drawins 2001 .260-363- l56,{D-l Component IDReferencesPNL.SEQ-244Drawing 10080-RTRF-2-8NDrawing 2001. 180-307- 131CUPS-VITBS2- IDrawing SK-E02-0376-E- I -5UPS-VITB52.1-REGDrawins SK-E02-0376-E- I -5D-2 }}