Letter Sequence Request |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20329A2922020-11-16016 November 2020 Application for Subsequent Renewed Facility Operating Licenses Project stage: Request ML20321A1872020-11-16016 November 2020 Single Positive Test Form Collected on 02/11/2020 Project stage: Request ML20329A2482020-11-16016 November 2020 Enclosure 3, Attachment 2, Appendix E Applicant'S Environmental Report Subsequent Operating License Renewal Point Beach Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Other ML21033A4022021-01-22022 January 2021 NextEra Energy Point Beach - Point Beach Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 Subsequent License Renewal Project stage: Other ML20351A3922021-01-26026 January 2021 Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process (EPID No. L-2020-SLE-0002) (Docket No. 50 266 and 50-301) - Letter Project stage: Other PMNS20210090, Environmental Scoping Meeting Related to the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Point Beach), Subsequent License Renewal Application2021-02-0303 February 2021 Environmental Scoping Meeting Related to the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Point Beach), Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Meeting ML21042B9452021-02-17017 February 2021 Scoping and Process Meeting - February 17, 2021 Project stage: Meeting ML21075A3432021-02-17017 February 2021 Meeting Summary: Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Review of the Subsequent License Renewal Application for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (EPID No.: L-2020-SLE-0002) - Summary Project stage: Meeting ML21062A1922021-02-17017 February 2021 Transcript from Point Beach Nuclear Plant Subsequent License Renewal Scoping Meeting Project stage: Meeting ML21070A2072021-03-15015 March 2021 License Renewal Regulatory Audit Regarding the Environmental Review of the Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Approval ML21075A3422021-03-17017 March 2021 Meeting Summary: Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Review of the Subsequent License Renewal Application for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (EPID No.: L-2020-SLE-0002) - Memo Project stage: Meeting ML21077A1972021-03-18018 March 2021 SLR - FW: Distribution: Meeting Summary: Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Review of the Subsequent License Renewal Application for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Project stage: Meeting ML21084A2582021-03-25025 March 2021 Public Comment Period Extension Request for Point Beach Subsequent License Renewal Scoping Project stage: Other ML21124A0312021-05-11011 May 2021 Summary of the Environmental Site Audit Related to the Review of the Subsequent License Renewal Application (EPID Number: L-2020-SLE-0002) Project stage: Approval ML21134A0582021-05-14014 May 2021 Final Request for Additional Information and Requests for Confirmation of Information - Point Beach SLRA Environmental Review (EPID No. L-2020-SLE-0002) - Email Project stage: RAI ML21134A0612021-05-14014 May 2021 Final Request for Additional Information and Requests for Confirmation of Information - Point Beach SLRA Environmental Review (EPID No. L-2020-SLE-0002) - Enclosure Project stage: RAI ML21138A8242021-05-18018 May 2021 SLR - FW: Final Request for Additional Information and Requests for Confirmation of Information Point Beach SLRA Environmental Review Project stage: RAI ML21138A8232021-05-18018 May 2021 SLR - FW: Final Request for Additional Information and Requests for Confirmation of Information Point Beach SLRA Environmental Review Project stage: RAI ML21194A1792021-08-16016 August 2021 Environmental Scoping Report Associated with the NRC Review of the Point Beach Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Approval ML21194A1752021-08-16016 August 2021 Letter - Issuance of Environmental Scoping Report Associated with the NRC Review of the Point Beach Subsequent License Renewal Application Project stage: Approval ML21319A2842021-11-15015 November 2021 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Meeting Related to the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Point Beach), Subsequent License Renewal Application ML22004A0282021-12-0808 December 2021 Transcript from Point Beach Nuclear Plant Subsequent License Renewal Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement - Public Comment Meeting - Evening Session ML22004A0232021-12-0808 December 2021 Transcript from Point Beach Nuclear Plant Subsequent License Renewal Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement - Public Comment Meeting - Afternoon Session ML22004A0772022-01-0606 January 2022 Summaries of December 8, 2021 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Subsequent License Renewal Application Public Meetings 2021-03-15
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML22010A0502022-01-0707 January 2022 Comment (274) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22010A0462022-01-0606 January 2022 Comment (271) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22010A0492022-01-0606 January 2022 Comment (273) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22010A0452022-01-0606 January 2022 Comment (270) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22010A0482022-01-0606 January 2022 Comment (272) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2442022-01-0505 January 2022 Comment (227) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2452022-01-0505 January 2022 Comment (228) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2462022-01-0505 January 2022 Comment (229) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2472022-01-0505 January 2022 Comment (230) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2582022-01-0404 January 2022 Comment (233) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2532022-01-0404 January 2022 Comment (231) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2552022-01-0404 January 2022 Comment (232) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A3372022-01-0404 January 2022 Comment (266) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A3392022-01-0404 January 2022 Comment (267) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A1932022-01-0404 January 2022 Comment (201) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22018A0812022-01-0404 January 2022 Comment (276) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A1102022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (164) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2032022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (204) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3732022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (42) of Jorge De Cecco on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22004A3772022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (45) of Ann Behrmann on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement Nexteraenergy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22004A3782022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (46) of Kevin Kamps on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22006A1022022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (159) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A3362022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (265) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3752022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (43) of Mary Able on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22006A0902022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (154) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3702022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (40) of Kelsey Saari on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22006A0882022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (152) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22018A0802022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (275) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3712022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (41) on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22006A0892022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (153) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A1042022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (161) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A0962022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (157) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2052022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (206) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A0912022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (155) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A1082022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (163) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A1012022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (158) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2002022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (203) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3592022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (30) of Henry Berkowitz on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22006A1032022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (160) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A1072022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (162) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A0932022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (156) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3762022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (44) of Wendy Fast on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement Nexteraenergy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22006A2042022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (205) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A1962022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (202) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2062022-01-0303 January 2022 Comment (207) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3692022-01-0202 January 2022 Comment (39) of Christopher Lish on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement Nexteraenergy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ML22006A1112022-01-0202 January 2022 Comment (165) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A0862022-01-0202 January 2022 Comment (151) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22006A2072022-01-0202 January 2022 Comment (208) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS ML22004A3682022-01-0202 January 2022 Comment (38) of Bonita Staas on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 2022-01-07
[Table view] |
Text
3/9/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/119887b2-a69f-422b-bf33-fe21c54a6ecd SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 As of: 3/9/21 3:37 PM E-RIDS=ADM-03 Received: March 03, 2021 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ADD: Phyllis Clark, Bill Rogers, Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. klu-bqjv-h9hb Kevin Folk, Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comments Due: March 03, 2021 Comment (180) Submission Type: Web Publication Date:2/1/2021 Citation: 86 FR 7747 Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0001 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0185 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-02001 Submitter Information Email: kevin@beyondnuclear.org Organization: Beyond Nuclear and Don't Waste Michigan General Comment (Beyond Nuclear, comment #11, Part 2)
For more information on "routine" radioactivity releases from nuclear power plants, please see the linked Beyond Nuclear pamphlet at:
<http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/356082/26605366/1444852853757/BN_RoutineRadioactiveReleases_Oct2015.pdf?
token=zwsUExAyfOttAa88dOgh7qJ3NkE%3D>.
Of course, as Beyond Nuclear has commented, the risk of a catastrophic radioactivity release at Point Beach is already significantly high, and increases with time. 80 years of operations at Point Beach, with its worst embrittled RPV (Reactor Pressure Vessel) in the U.S., represents sailing ever deeper into uncharted PTS (Pressurized Thermal Shock) risk territory. A catastrophic radioactivity release at Point Beach would have LARGE impacts on Indigenous Nations' interests on and near the site, and very likely far from the site, depending on wind direction, water flow, and food chain distribution networks. EXTRA LARGE, in fact, to borrow a phrase from Susan Schuurman with the Nuclear Issues Study Group in Albuquerque, NM, Beyond Nuclear's colleague in the fight against Consolidated Interim Storage Facilities for irradiated nuclear fuel in s.e. NM, also on lands significant to many Indigenous Nations, as well as the Latinx communities who live there now.
The basic form letter goes on, "Although construction of the existing PBN facility itself may have impacted any archaeological resources that may have been located within its footprint, much of the surrounding area remains largely undisturbed."
That description of past destruction due to lack of caring, concern, law, and regulation is very heartbreaking, and enraging. It can never be repeated again in the future, now that the United States supposedly recognizes that cultural genocide is not acceptable (a dubious proposition, given how Indigenous cultural resources and properties are still abused and even destroyed in this country -- take the Dakota Access Pipeline bulldozing Lakota sacred sites in the Dakotas in 2016, as but one example). But again, "routine" hazardous radiation releases, and the potential for catastrophic, large-scale hazardous radiation releases, also represent an EXTRA LARGE impact. This has gone on for 50 years already, and would go on for another 30 years, if NRC rubber-stamps Point Beach's license extension application.
blob:https://www.fdms.gov/119887b2-a69f-422b-bf33-fe21c54a6ecd 1/2
3/9/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/119887b2-a69f-422b-bf33-fe21c54a6ecd The basic form letter goes on:
"A cultural resources survey of the property was not required prior to the construction of PBN, but five recorded surveys were conducted at various stages of expansion and licensing between 1993 through 2018. These surveys have covered approximately 972 acres of the of the 1,260-acre PBN property. There are no National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible cultural resources confirmed within the 1,260-acre PBN property. The June 2004 survey identified findings, which included 15 isolates and one prehistoric archaeological site. PBN has committed to avoiding previously identified sites within the 1,260-acre property."
It is sad and angering that "A cultural resources survey of the property was not required prior to the construction of PBN". This means that Indigenous Nations' cultural resources and properties, including burial sites and sacred sites, could well have been damaged or destroyed simply through the physical construction of the facility, let alone radioactive contamination since.
And what about Point Beach Nuclear committing to avoiding damage or destruction to unidentified sites on the property, in addition to identified sites?
Such damage or destruction can never be allowed to happen again, including on "much of the surrounding area
[that] remains largely undisturbed." Of course, "routine"hazardous radioactivity release contamination is itself a significant disturbance, which Point Beach Nuclear entirely downplays and ignores in its basic form letter.
Again, re: the basic form letter's claim that:
"A cultural resources survey of the property was not required prior to the construction of PBN, but five recorded surveys were conducted at various stages of expansion and licensing between 1993 through 2018.These surveys have covered approximately 972 acres of the of the 1,260-acre PBN property. There are no National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible cultural resources confirmed within the 1,260-acre PBN property. The June 2004 survey identified findings, which included 15 isolates and one prehistoric archaeological site. PBN has committed to avoiding previously identified sites within the 1,260-acre property."
It is hard to understand how Point Beach Nuclear can state that "There are no National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible cultural resources confirmed within the 1,260-acre PBN property."
(To be continued) blob:https://www.fdms.gov/119887b2-a69f-422b-bf33-fe21c54a6ecd 2/2