ML20210D675
| ML20210D675 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 07/03/1984 |
| From: | Bishop T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210D653 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-197 NUDOCS 8609190297 | |
| Download: ML20210D675 (16) | |
Text
o
- r L ,
, . - ~ ~ . . , - -
,. G:c's v
- I
- i- .
/ -
JUL 3 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, NRR FROM: T. W. Bishop, Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects, Region V
REFERENCE:
Covernment Accountability Project Letter to Mr. Hans Schierling Dated May 31, 1984
SUBJECT:
TRANSFER OF LEAD RESPONSIBILITY FOR RESOLUTION OF ALLEGATIONS; DIABLO CANYON UNITS 1 and 2; DN 50-275 and 50-323 The Diablo Canyon Allegation Review Panel met on July 2, 1984, and determined that certain allegations contained in the referenced letter are appropriate' for transfer to'NRR for resolution. NRR had verbally accepted responsibility for resolution of these allegations. The purpose of this letter is to document that understanding. These allegations are numbered in the Diablo Canyon Allegation Management System from 1120 thru 1129, inclusive.
NRR is requested to assume lead responsibility for the resolution of these allegations including a determination of whether or not any of these allegations require resolution prior to full power operations at Diablo Canyon.
NRR is requested to provide itten documentation of closecut of these allegations to Region V at s. time as determined appropriate.
i.wdip T. W. Bishop, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects
Attachment:
List of Allegations Assigned to NRR as of July 3, 1984 cc/ attachment Hans Schierling George Knighton f
.l 8609190297 860716 PDR FOIA HOLMES86-197 PDR
~
FAGF NO. (9 m I 4
A ? /. . '. /0 4 .
DI ADLO C/iN(ON AL. FGATInti F T L F 'DCAFi AL LEG 8t i Ev rithAnli FFFJ ON O TAR A( TFF1.'AT10N AtLI'GFR ORIG DortsMENT Al.IFRNATF IJOC 11 IMING lift Wu t 7 SIGIP Nf:R SFISMir CATFqiORY I/CATFGOR( IT 21 ItlTERF ACE
+ > a4f1 DIFSEL INTAFE NRR SEISMIC DESIGN OF DIESEL GFNERATOR INIAVE AND E1DIAUST oill 2 HELB ASSESSMENT NRR THE HIGH ENERGY LINE PREAE 21 04 ELD) ASSESSMENT DID NOT MEET THE FSAR OR R.G. 1.46 not3 SISIP NRR INADFellATE SE!SMIC SYSTEMS 21/S7.
<H O ANNta.US STRt fCTt>RE NRR ANNULUS STRUCTURE 21 REVERIFICATI REVERIFICATION eVGI STRUCT13hAL ANAtTSIS NRR DA FROCEDURES FOR STRUCTURAL Og ANALYSIS o< G2 , SEISMIC ANALYSIS NRR SEISMIC ANALYSIS FOR 21 CONTAINMENT 0034 INCOMPLETE AS-DillLTS NRR INCOMPLETE AS-DUILT DRAWINGS 21/5%
Os C6 SISIP NRR RESOLUT!ON OF FLUORESCENT O1/St LIGHT FIXTtlRC IN1ERACTION/COFFLE1E SEISMIC INTERACTION PROGRAM FTilDR TO EXCEEDING 5% POWCG eXi45 RitR VA4.WS NRR DESIGN INCONSISTENCY IN FSAG 21/57.
RHR VALVES 0055 GMALL DORE Plff; NRR DFCHTEL APPRGVED ANAL YSIS OF 21 ANAtYSIS SMALL DORE PIPE DY ALTFRlMG FAILED ANALYSIS i n:a79 STRES3 CAtCS/ VARTETY NCR ENGINEERS ARE CALCI A. AT ING 21 OF WAYS STRCSST13 IN P! PING IN A VARIFIY Or WAYS AN33 DOrtlMENT CONTROL tilm STNSITIVC/ SITE DESIGN ENGINFER n HA'/C NO T DFEN RT OtJIRED TO WOM; I til flG CONT Rt M t F D DOCi 'MF.N I S. ,
T C Sitt TI NG Its fitr ilSC OF Dif FIletflT lif S IGti AG ".1 MF'i! DitS AtJD l'ilII U I'Iq Md 1 MS inwh 11 l'OL 1 IC*ill tl t ri:ff 1i f .f it t t)f'11f.N ?!
- +1 s 7 t il 4 t <t i Al ii* Ie tt i li . T - ( Al e 8 4 A 1 !I M t': ' -t i A t t in 11a
- 4 f t!4 I lf1 At " s' ;tIJi li . , ' t e s , t le
m
~
[
l.
x.
=
_. PAGE NO. tVwXt2
^
- 07/07/84 ,
. DI AIt.O CANYON ALLEGATIGN FIL F (DCAF) l .
l f.fLEG4 VEYPHFASE RfCPON CilARACTERIZATION ALLEN R ORIO DOCllMFI8T At .1 F F NA IE DOC I.LOS f tse fiF .
~
i 0608- .CDDE f(<EAK DFSIGN NRR UNDUCItMMENTED NODIF ICATIONS OI WERE MACC FFME OF CODE i .
'. FCFAr PftOF(EMil
- OOH 9 LMISTRUT AS A PIPE NRR INTERFERANCE Ok *IPE , '
21 SUPPORT SUPPORTS (ATTEMPIED USE OF UNISTRUT AS A PIPE SUPPORT 0095 SUPPORT MEMBER ANGLES NRR ANGLCS OF PIPE SUPPORT MEMBEM 21
- ARF OUT OF SPECIFICATION Os *97 DOCUMENT CONTROL NRR SITE DESIGN ENGINEERS HAVE 21 BEEN RECUIRED TO USE LNCONTROLLED DOCUMENTS.
i 0100 OC FOR FnINT NRR NO QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM FOR 73 COATINGS 0I47 COMMON RACEWAY NRR CABLE TRAY AND CONDUITS OF 22 SUPPORTS 1NDEPENDENT AND REDUNDANT TRAINS WERE INSTALLED ON COMMON RACEWAY SUPPORTS
! 0158' UNIT 2 ANNULUS DESIGN NRR SENSITIVE /tmIT 2 ANNULUS 22 l
DESIGN-INADEOUATE SEISNIC LOAD COMBINATIONS 0159 LMIT 2 +.NNI A US DESIGN NRR SENSITIVE / UNIT 2 ANNILUS 22
.. DESIGN-STEEL MEMBERS MAY BE
[ OVER STRESSED DUE TO ADDITIONS l
l- 0160 . 'LNIT 2 ANNIAUS DESIGN NRR SENSITIVE / UNIT 2 ANNULUS . ~22 t' DESIGN-BRACINOS CARRY AXIAL
=
LOADS AND SUPPORTS
- DESIGN-TOO MANY ASSUMPTIONS OF CLASS II AND GMALL BORE LOADS l 6142
- INIT 2 ANNIt IIS DESIGN Nrdt SENSITIVE / UNIT 2 ANNULUS 27 DESIGN-cat CL4. ATIDNS C14ANCED 9(
PEVIEWER WITHOUT CONSULTATION WIIll ORIGIPV,7f:R/CliFCI TR , ,
l a:I t,3 * ' INIT 2 MfNIR 193 DESIfiN F#-R ' SEPISil!W' UNI T '2 ANNt t.Ld ??
l} ITS I GN- I ME fMf R ASSi d1P T IONS I !<r! AlrD Itt THFRMAL EvfWISIf 44 l
. . t hi 4W4I (J k p 4 9 6 > th *ft s 4 4 t1(dt '# f fil i ! W /t. NIT 2 Mirant:q *
?
l f(SIfda 18LAPC NHf CHf Cl ED FCC *
- - ir.wInr. I AII istr is u l
f
_-i t
. , , - +. _ - , ,. . , -. . , , , - -
.. FWlir t40, t wWec s'attre t/fl4
- DIADLO CANYON Al. LEGATION Fil,F (DCAFD AL LI' G# FCYritRASE RESPON CHARACTERIZATION At. LEGER ORIG DOCt MENT ALTF6HATF f)Or' Ct ry; SNG prr 0165' ilNIT 2 ANNiltl3S DFSIfiN NRR SENSITIVE /IINIT 2 ANN 11LtJS DESIGN-COMF1.fTER CODE CifECK DID [
NOT ACCOUNT FOR TORTIONAL STRESSES 0177 RHR VALVES NRR GFNSITIVE/RHR PUMP SICTION LINE VALVE CONTROL. POTENTIAL ]
DAMACE TO RHR PtJMPS DtJE TO LOSS OF SUCTION AS A RESULT OF A SINGLE FAILURE OIR2' BOLT TOROUING NRR STANDARD DESIGN FLANGES WERE
- 22
, USED ON CLASS 2 PIPING. ICLTS ON FLANGES IN THE CVCS, RHR, AND RCS SYSTEM DID NOT MEET ASME CODE FOR TOROUE O222 FLtJD COMPUTER NRR/RI FLUD COMPUTER PROGRAN PRODLErtS ELAWAR R/94A046 AT DIABLO CANYON 0252 NODIFICATIONS/FSAR NRR NANGEMENT INSTRUCTED .!NGINEERS STOt:ES 2/2/04 GAP #A151
~
TO CERTIFY THE NODIFICATIONS DID NOT AFFECT THE FASR, I 3
- WITHOUT VERIFYING TFE CONCLUSION l
1 0205 AS-BUILTS WITHOtJT NRR MANAGEMENT INe.TRUCTED A DESIGN UNLNOWN 3/2/84GAPN216 I ANALYSIS ENGINEER TO APPROVE PIPE SlJPPORT RE/ISIONS PWWED ON .
AS-RJILT DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE BENFFIT OF AN ANALYSIS
~
4'
'. n206 -l : . IXJICK FI X NRR MANAGEMENT KEPT PERSONNEL STOLES. 3/2/04 GAP #217 PARTICIPATING IN THE QUICK FIX lh- . , PROGRAM IGNORANT OF Tile GROtlND j i %JLES (J287 . OllICl! FIX NRR A QUICK FIE MEMO DID NOT STOVES 3/2/04 GAP #218 StlCCEED IN CLEARING UP
, Cfv4 FUSION, IECAUSE IT MISSED I. / NORF'OF THE FROGRAM THAN IT-l . COVERCD
. , +
~ ' ~
'0200
~ DUICK FIV HF< R IN JilHE. 1993 NEMO. MANAGEHF.NT STOLES 3s'2/04 GAP 48219 f
, Dif<ECT ED Tl4AT f5DTC* S "N<t'.10
- 1. DC' 1REATED IN . Tile SAME NANNE R -
.'.5 J.T IIE (it: 1 O I HAl .
- AT'TT:(lVF D F0f(
- CfMISitetK I f D N' r4MW INO"
. ..': e't * - t 't t l e I . I i W 118 f f del ll:f Witill f *e fit l' F ! vf G WEffr 'illit I 'i'
- C /f W if.ftl N ..
C.lif e,1f t' T TH I (.10 P Rf;V IE&f.
11All/.l r rff til I El i I'if.Ilf AT IWS f f W t . 6's ' *il s C I *. . I t tfe r li sr I fit! ' IMP. 1 A l .I
. (.8
- T I I l 1. .~.1 .-
- - - _ ~ ,
. PAGE.NO. ONm4 07/03/04
- DIAft0 CANYON ALLEGATION FILE (DCAF)
Al L EGN l'EYPtiR ASE RESPON CHARACTERIZATION ALLEGER
., ORIG DOCUMENT ALTEf:NAIC DOC El OSING fWF 0290 DUICt: Flx NRR THE UNCONTROLLED OtJICV FIX STOFE9 '~/2/04 gar #?21 AUTHORIlV WAS ABUSED u?91 DUICM FIX NRR THE OUICK FIX PROGRAM STOSE'S 3/2/04GAPN222 IMPROPCRLY CU3STITUTED FOR THE FORMAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OA RCPORTING SYSTEM THROtJGHOUT THE PROGRAM FOR HANGERS O292 OUICK FIX NRR THE OUICK FIX PROGRAM STOVES 3/2/840APN223 SUBSTITUTED INFORMAL REPAIRS FOR CONTROLLED CORRECTIVE ACTION THROUGH THE FORMAL NONCONFORMANCE SYSTEM 0293 OllICK FIX NRR MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS STOVES- 3/2/04GAPN224 ARDITRARILY LIMITED THE SCOPE OF THE OUICK FIX PROGRAM WilEN FREINSPECTION " ENGINEERS TRIED .*
TO USE IT AS A SOLUTION TO OUALITY DEFICIENCIES O296, OUICK FIX NRR THE OUICK FIX PROGRAM WAS USED ANONYMOUS 3/2/04GAPN248 TO THWART OC INSPECTORS WHO
- RAISED PROBLEMS WITH WELD SYMBOLS WHEN THEY REFUSED TO SION FOR WELDS THEY COULD NOT READ SYMBOLS FOR O297 SEIGNIC DFSIGN REVIEW NRR THE RELIABILITY OF THE SEISMIC ANONYMOUS 3/2/04GAPN259
, DESIGN REVIEW IS HAMPERED BY ITS RELIANCE ON DEFICIENT DATA .
FROM APPARENTLY UNOUALIFIED PERSONNEL DURING 01/02 WALVDOWN OF PLANT 0290 : NO ROOM FOR NRR NO ROOM FORMOVEMENT WITH ANONYMOUS Of2/04GAPN263 MOVEMEN T/DAGEPLATE ATTACHMENTS AND BASEPLATES OFtGERVED AS A GENERIC PROT 4EM
, u299 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW flRR SEICt11C DESIGN REVIEW FAILED ANOttYMOUS 3/2/04 GAP #262 TO ACF.OUN T FOR EX TF<A RESIDtIAl.
STREGS TPOM frXR WCl. DING , .
o?.00 . GFI9MIC DESIGN GFVIFW NPR FNGINf rR'i IN Ti4E GFIGNIC STOLES 3!2/04GAPN264 DESIGN REVIEW DID NOT liAVE WRIllEN Pl<0CEDl3RES TO GilIDE Titr If( ItGE OF STRtfDl. COMPtlTER "
f f sof;RArt
- s .- -
PAGE NO. 00605 67/03/n4
- DI ADLO CANYON All.EGATION FILI' (DCAF)
At i EGW VEYPHRAGE RESPON CitARACTERIZATION AI.LEGFR ORIG DOCllMENT At IFFNATF DOC Cl 09 tNG RF F 6301 GEIGNIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR ENGINEE RS IN TtlE STRESS GRntlP GTOiES !/2/04 gat #265 WERE TRANSFERRED AFTER CHALLENOING St'SPECT CHANGFS IN THE MODELS FOR REVIEW CALCtJLATIONS 0302 OUICV FIX NRR OUICK FIX REMOVED WELD SYMBOLS STdt:ES r/22/04JI#20 FROM DRAWINOS 0303'- SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR INADEOUATE RECORDS OF HANGER STOKES I/2/04 GAP #266
' CALCULATIONS REQUIRE EXPANDED SAMPLING BY SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW 0304 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR OUESTIONADLE CONSERVATIVE STOKES 3/2/84 GAP #267
, BASIS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW (DOCtlMENT 049243) 0305 . SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR ANALYSIS ME-IOI FOR SEISMIC STOVES 3/2/04 GAP #26G DESIGN REVIEW DOES NOT REPRESENT CONSERVATIVE ENGINEERING STANDARDS "IN MANY ,
CASES" 0306 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR MANAGEMENT DID NOT FREELY STOVES' 3/2/04GAPW269A DISTRIBUTE PROFESSIONAL CODES
, THAT SUPPOSEDLY PARALLELEDCOMPUTER ANALYSIS RELIED ON BY ENGINEERS IN THE SIESMIC DESIGN REVIEW 0307 M-9 COMPUTER ANALYSIS NRR M-9 COMPUTER ANALYSIS FOR STOI:ES- .!/2/04GAPN269D ANGLES OMITTED AISC PROVISION FOR ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS, CONTRARY 10 LICENSING COMMITMENTS 0300 MANAGEMFNT OVERRuiFD NRR MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS OVERRULED ANONYMOUS 3/2/04GAPW271 ENGINEERS ENGINEERS WHO ATTEMPTED TO
.CALCul. ATE FFFCCTS AND STRESSES OF TORG10NAL 1.OADS CRFATED ON PIPC Gilf t OR TFi DURING IllST At t.Ai ! ON
^ 6'49 GFISMIC DFGIGN RFVIFW Nim - MANAf.FMrNT IMPO9ED GTOF F.1 3/2/04GAf'#272 INCONSISTENT STANDARDS FOR MODIFICATIONS IN THE St.fGHIC DESIi.H PfNIrW s e '. l i t bl.l'. Nil. I rl * . f a .f t 14'.*ll W ( 11 . 1 4 f or rt t il l I GC.l li D t it t i - t il' Dvelf G I O! ! 1 7./2/O 1GAPet 27 Fi!!1rl f Il'l: T.If<lIPI it/.NtlAt 1 IO fillill a! F l .', all Tl!I l i t .M l l'
- 4 r I t.'l I ! '811 le
~. . - . . - ~ _ . ._ . _ _ - . - - - - . ..- . . . - . . .
. PAGE t40. 00006 07/03/04 *
+
DI ADLO CANYON ALLEGATION FILE (DCAF)
ALLEO# l'EYPHRASE f<CSPON CHARACTERIZATION AL, LEGER ~
ORIG DOCUNFNT ALTERNATF DOC Cl.OSING F<f:F 0311 OUT DATED ' SEISMIC. DATA NRR ENGINEERS IN THE STRESS GROUP STot tS 3/2/04 GAP #274
, RELIED ON OUTDATED SEISMIC DATA TitAT WAS NECESSARY FOR
, THEIR CALCtJLATIONS 03I2 BECHTEL'S COMPUTER NRR BECHTEL'S COMPUTER PROGRAM DID STOVES 3/2/04 GAP #275 NOT HAVE AN ADEDUATE " MEMORY" FOR ENGINEERS TO CONDUCT FULL <
t ANALYSES OF COMPLEX HANGER 0313 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR THERE WAS NO CONSISTENT STOVES 3/2/84 GAP #276 PROCEDURE OR CRITERION TO GUIDE ENGINEERG WHO CHECVED CALCULATIONS IN THE SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW 0314 ' SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR MANAGE?1ENT DIRECTED A. PURGE OF STOVES 3/2/04GAPN277 FILES TO REMOVE ANY EVIDENCE OF PREVIOUSLY DESTROYED OR CENSORED WORK FRON ENGINEERS WHO FAILED HANGERS DUT WERE LATER OVERRtJLED 0315 PRELIMINARY CALLS ON NRR WHEN ASSUMPTIONS OR LOADS WERE STONES? 3/2/04GAPw278 PIPE SilPP CHANGED FOR PRELIMINARY CALCUt.ATIONS ON PIPE StlPPORTS THAT PREVIOUSLY HAD FAILED, NO ONE RECEIVED OR CHECKED Tr4E ENTIRE CALCULATION.
0316 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR A BECHTEL OFFICIAL APPROVED STOKES 3/2/04 GAP #279 THE. SEISMIC REVIEW .
-CALCULATIONS EN MASSE DVER -
SEVERAL DAYS WITHOUT SDJDYING
-AND PROPERLY. REVIEWING THE IdORK-0318 . NO DETAILS TO VENDORS NRR MANAGEMENT DID NOT SEND
- STOVE;3 ; 3/2/04GAPit201 DRAWING DETAILS AND SUPPORT CONDITIONS TO VALVE MAtJUFACTtJRERS AND OTHER VENDORS FOR APPROVAL 0319 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR : MANAGENENT'S PRODUCTION STOl'ES 3/2/04GAPM202
- SCifEDUIE FOR SFISMIC DEGIGN REVIEW WAS TOO RIGOROtG 0326 - APPROVED tlAtua l:S littR ENGINFTRS AIPROVf D liANGER'i S10l 1 'i .
'. / 2/ O 1 f ,AP 18 20 ',
l'A!II) 011 0 0llt ' S01 I"I Y !W ' THE IIABID - OF-
- Efill01.ItSIOil9 IN Fil F 04"24'. Ofift
'11 tl il AR f
- t i f SetPli o t';
O
~
, PAGF 'tJO. A ceM 7 n?*n3/04 '
DI ADLO CANYON All EGATION FILE (DCAF)
At L EGN - t EYPHRA'iC PCSPON CHARACTERIZATION ALLEGFR ORIG DOCUMENT Al.TFRNAIF DOC Fi091NG RFF 0321 .DC/SF COMMIINICATION9 NRR DECAllSE SITE FNOINEFRS HAD TO STDIF9 3/2/04GAPN204 BREALDOWN WAIT UP TO A WEEM TO ODTAIN INFORNATION FROM SAN FRAtlCISCO OFFICE. DECISIONS WERE MADE WITHOUT NECFSSARY INFORMATION A322 DC/SF COMMUNICATIONS NRR THERE WAS NO SYSTEN USED TO STOl:ES - 3/2/04GAPp205 DREAVDOWN VERIFY ACCURACY OF INFORMATION ODTAINED FROM SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE ON TELEPilONE 0323 M-9 COMPUTER ANALYSIS NRR STOKES REPORTED ERRORS IN THE STOMEfi 3/2/84 GAPE 207 M-9 COMPUTER ANALYSIS, WHICH INCGARE'CTLY INSTRUCTED ENDINEERS IN MAKING CALCULATIONS
~
0324 NEW CALCS LESS NRR THE CALCULATIONS USED TO STOVES 3/2/84 GAP #200 SOPflISTICATED T OVERRULE THOSE REJECTING PIPE StrPORTS WERE LESS SOPHISTICATED THAN THE ORIGINAL CALCULATIONS 0325 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR ENDINEERS.WERE INSTRUCTED TO STOl:ES 3/2/84 gar #209 INDICATE THAT SEISMIC' DESIGN REVIEW CALT.ULATIONS WOULD NOT AFFECT THE FSAR 0326 - CALCS ALTERED WITHOUT NRR CALCULATIONS THAT CALLED-FOR' STOKES 3/2/04 GAP #290 ORIGINAT FIELD MODIFICATIONS WERE ALTERED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ORIGINATOR .
O S27 ' MANAGEMENT. PICC AND NRR NULTIPLE ENGINEERS STOVES 3/2/84GAPNO91 CllOSE PRE INDEPENDENTLY PRODtlCED PRFLIMINARY CALCULATIONS ON THE SAME HANGERS, ALLOWING MANAGEMENT TO PICM AND CHOOSE 0337', Pt. AN T NRR PLANT DESION DOES NOT- ANONYMOllS 3/2/04GAPit301 DE:S IGN/ IF MT *ERATURE REALIGTICALLY ACCOIINT FOR THE VARIA FULL EFFEC 1 FROM TEMPE RATilRE VAf tI A T I Ott'i ,
- *3S I StOTTED HOLES NRR ' SLOTTED HOLES ON RtiPTilRE ANONYMOUS 4!12/04 GAP rsFSIRAINTS NOT IN ACCORDAfJCE
~ W I TH A". TM A -30.
e1P t ullt.!~ l i y I ff R I At l' ' tF l 'l f f 'I' I f *.1 ' Di(Abil t ri ANottyltoleG ' O.
- 01 rff '
( Ittill 01. I T ISTf D Al IN tt i Mart
( f H t [ '" i t~ I " s m - _. -. --- i_--__- - &
W PGF NO. 0*>O0 07/03/H4 DIADL0 CANYON Alt.EGATION FILE (DCAF)
All.EGil ' VEYPHRASE RESPON CHARACTERIZATION All.EGER ORIG Df1CliMitlT ALIEFNATE DOC Cl OqlHG PrF 44'.3 OUICK FIX NRR DUICl: FIX DECAME THC PLANT ANONYMOUS 3/03/04 GAP DESIGN 0670 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW MAY HAVE ANONYMOUS 3/ 2/04 GAPt006'.
FAILED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE EFFECTS OF THE WEl.D SYMDOL DREAKDOWN
, 0061 .DOLTING NRR DESIGN DRAWINGS DO NOT SPECIFY CONFIDENTIAL 5/3/04 GAP ELONGATED HOLES ITEMR1APO 0862 - DOLTINO NRR HOLE SIZES ARE OUTSIDE OF CODE CONFIDENTIAL 5/3/84GAPITEMD SPECIFICATIONS 1BPB 0064 DOLTING NRR DOLT REUSE CRITERIA IS NOT IN CONFIDENTIAL 5/3/84 ACCORDANCE WITH AISC GAPITEMD1D PD REQUIREMENTS 0071 DO'LTING NRR PROCEDURE (ESD 243) TABLES OF LOCVERT' 5/3/04 GAP ACCEPTABLE WASHERS WERE NOT ITEMI P10 UPDATED IN LATE '83 PER AISC SEC 5 PAGE 191 PARA 2(A) 0073 BOLTINO/ PACKING HOLCS NRR THERE ARE EXAMPLES OF PACKINO CONFIDENTIAL 5/3/84 GAP FOREIGN MATERIAL IN BOLT HOLES ITEMBIEPO CONTR4RY TO AISC RCOUIREMENTS 0805 BOLTING NRR PPP DID NOT HAVE PROPER TOROUE LOCidERT 5/3/84 GAP TADLES IN EFFECT 3 YEARS AFTER EXHI 4 P7 WRITING NCR DC2-80-RM-OO2 0889 STOVES REDUTTAL NRR PG&E STATED THAT ALL SUPPORTS STOKES .T20 4/3/04
, WERE OtlALIFIED WHEN SIX P12-5 SUPPORTS WERE STILL UNDUALIFIED 0090 STOLES REDtlTTAL NRR SAME PERSON WHO ORIGINALLY STOVES'. T2O 4/3/04 P21 PERFORMED A CALCULATION ~23 (DESIGNER) WA", ALSO THE PERSON WHO CHECVED THE CALCULATION
, (CHEC)ER). PG?.,E STATFD OfflERWISE HI191 STOl'ES REDtlT TAI. NRR DESIGN DID NOT HAVC CONIROLLED SIO) ES TOO 4/3/84 POS
- DOrtlMFNIS TilAT IHEY NrrDFD TO **
REDUCC IllE POSSIDIlITY OF CAI f'lli Af f l1H liRf<nR". f OM: ,
SI AllT' Ollli RidlCE a 'li9: % Illi I H I.I til'1 liel f il elt I T.? f ",I n t i G 'lllAl ilifilliffrsS %IIH f . l '. **
- 1 ~* ' N 4 P','6 WI I4 l e el n itt t tirl Il ,I ll'(. f d i' lit f.
Ot t t it l e 14 t ilif N I H lit Illi f f' f 4 tt l'11f i t ! l St 'f ill tI f l' i f f t' l 'f e , a t il ? ' . H. i' l li ' *f I- t l o ffil-
. F' AGE N'O. (HMO9 07/*M3 / OO *
. DI ADLO CANYON ALLEGATION FILE (DCAF)
Al l.FG et >T YPitRASE RESPON CilARACTERI Z ATION ALLEGER ORIO DortlMFNT Al. TERNATE DOC CtOSING REF
- 0093 STOI:ES PEDilTTAL NRR PG&E STATES THCY HAVE A GTOI:FS T20 4/3/04 P26 MONTitLY REVIEW PROGRAM TO - 14 REVIEW WHAT DOCUMENTS ARF INEACH ENGINECR'S POSSESSION IN 11 NONTitS, THEY HEVIR DID THIS 6094 STOVES REDUTTAL NRR PG&E CHANGED THE MONTHLY STOVFS T20 4/3/04 P?6 REVIEW TO A PERIODIC REVIEW - 19 WHICH WAS AFTER THE INSPECTION PERFORMED EtY Tile NRC, THUS MISLEADING THE NRC 0895 STOKES FCDUTTAL NRR PG&E STATED THAT ALL DOCllMENTS STOKES T20 4/3/04 WERE tlP TO DATE AS OF NOV. '02 P27-21 BUT A DOCUMENT ISSUED TO STOKES IN JAN. *02 WAS 3 REVISIONS OUT OF DATE 0896- NRR PG&E STATES THAT THE CAUSE OF STOKES T20 4/3/04 22/PE6-E7 s
SUPERCEDED DOCUMENTS DEING P29-12
^
USED WAS THAT ENGINEERS KEPT THE OLD ONES AFTER BEING ISSUED SUPPLEMENTS. STOKES FEELS IT WAS MANAGEMENT'S FAllLT 0097 STOKES REBtlTTAL NRR PG&E STATES THERE ARE TRAINING STOf:ES T20 4/3/04
, PROGRAMS IN FORCE CONCERNING P56-3 DOCUMENT CONTROL. MR. STOI:ES f3TATEG HE NEVER GOT ANY TRAINING .
0090 NCR/DR/DCN/DP NRR PGLE STATES THAT DIADLO STOKES T20 4/3/04 PRODLENS.(DP) WAS NOT A DA P'6-20 DOCUMENT DECAUSE THitEY WERE A SUDSTITIITE FOR DA FtUT IT ACTUALLY ALLOWED TIIEM TO DYPASS DA PROGRAM 0099 ~ NEW CAL CS L ESS NRR .PGRE STATES THEY USE MORE STOI TS TOO 4/3/04 S11Pillu11CATED SONflSTICATED TECHNIO11Efi FTIR P44-0 MORE DETAllED ANALYSIS TO SHOW ~ '
TitAT PIPE AND SUPPORTS ARE -
ACCEPT Alit.E DUT TIIC SUDSEDilENT CALCljtAIION WHICil PASSED THE Silf f *f 'I';l bW3 f E'IS f.Olit15T ICA1 ovoie S10t r$ lf latil lot tif f P PGtF ';TMFR TilFY UOFD Tilf STDI Fh i 126 4'3/04 '
I Otif S t TClininN Or AHM I DS. P 16 .'O Hilf tt iti i Ar r f t ti: I insli S t I I'N'; l Oi l i S N*< * ! I t'i.
. FAGE NO. 600Iu .
u?/u V04
- DI ADLO CANYON AL LFGATION FIL E (DCAFI At.1FG# lEYPffDAGE RESPON CHARACTERIZATION ALLEGER ORIG DOCllMENT ALTERNATE DOC Ft.09 t rin rfr 0901 STOI:ES REDUTTAL NF<R PGSE STATED THA1 A SAMPLE SIZE S'TOIEG TOO 4/3/84 WAS 5000 FT FOR 25000 FT AND P49-21 ANOTHER PLACE 5000 FT FOR 15000 FT. THEY LATER STATED THE SAMPLE REMAINED THE SAME THROUGH-THE SMALL DORE REVERIFICATION PROGRAM 0902 TUBE STEEL /Ft.ARE NRR PG&E STATES ALL STEEL AT STOVES T20 4/3/04 DEVEL WEtDS DIADLO CANYON COMPLIES WITH P51-24 AMERICAN STANDARDS 27 MINIMUM RADIUS. SOME STEEL WAS FOUND WITH A 1.5T RADIUS 0956', STOl:ES REDUTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STOVES T22 4/27/84 DY PGLE IN MEETING WilH NRC ON P92-2-23 4/21/04 CONCERNING TRAINING OF NEW EMPLOYEES 0957 STOKES REBUTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STOKES T22 4/27/84 BY PG&E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON P93-21 4/21/04 CONCERNING CONSERVATISM OF PIPE SUPPORT CALCULATIONS 0950 STOKES REBUTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATENENTS MADE STOKES T22 4/27/84 BY PG&E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON P94,90 4/21/04 CONCERNING CONTROL OF ENGINEERING MANUALS 0959.' STOKES REBUTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STOKES T22 4/27/04 BY PG&E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON .P122-10 4/21/84 CONCERNING MANAGEMENT
, REVIEW OF EMPLOYEES MANUALS 0960 STOKES REDtJTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STOKES T22 4/27/04 BY PG&E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON P126-15 4/21/B4 CONCERNING RESULT OF
-PG&E DA AUDITS IN AREA OF PIPING AND PIPE SitPPORT ANALYSIS 6961 STottG REDtJTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STO:FS TO? 4/27/04 *
- DY PGtE IN MEETING WITH NRP DN Pl33-10 * -
4/28 /04 CONCFRNING DI AIIL ()
PROPtFMS (DP) PROUPAM an6? GTOI En t>r- Dtll I At f lRP . MATFRIAt. FALSE STATEMENT MADE STO! f U T22 4/27/04' HY P* iM E IN MI ET lHG WI Tl! Nf 4 DN 1 ill ?
- 4*28JP1 I h?!Eff tllfl0 Fil flHi
' ' f f i t H il I id.Hr f*;
4
. PAGE NO, l'at'M a j l 0 7 /M /00
- DIADLO CANYON ALLEGATION FILE'(DCAF)
At.L EGit F.EYPNRASE RI'SPON CifARACTERI2ATION Alt.FGER
- ORIG DOCUMFNT ALTFRNATE DOC Ct OfilNO REF 0963, f3TOVES REPtlTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STOFES' T22'4/27/84 B7 PG&E IN METTING WITil NRC ON P142-24 4/21/04 CONCERNING JUDGCMENTS MADE DY OtlICK FIM ENGINEERS Oi&4 STOKES REDliTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATFMENT MADE STOKES T22 4/27/04 BY PGI.E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON P140-16 4/21/04 CONCERNING CONTENT OF
, AS-BUILT PACVAGES 0965 STOVES REBUTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT NADE STOVES T22 4/27/84 BY PG&E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON P150-6 4/21/G4 CONCERNING PERCENTAGE OF ORIGINAL PIPE SUPPORT CALCULATIONS REOUIRING ADDITIONAL WORK 0966 STOKES REBitTTAL NRR ACCEPTANCE OF PIPE SUPPORTS STOVES T22 4/27/04 BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT P151-13 NOT JUSTIFIED 0967 STOVES REBUTTAL NRR MATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STOl;ES
- T22 4/27/04 DY PG&E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON P156-11 4/21/04 CONCERNING THE USE OF PHONE CALLS TO PROVIDE DESIGN INFORMATION TO SITE A968 FALSE STATEMENT NRR NATERIAL FALSE STATEMENT MADE STOVES T22 4/27/84 ftY PG&E IN MEETING WITH NRC ON' P159-17 4/21/04 CONCERNING CRITERIA .
USED IN ACCEPTANCE OF PIPE SUPPORTS .
1010. SEISMIC nCSIGN REVIEW NRR STOKES PRELIMINARY STOVES T21 4/26/04 CALCULATIONS WERE REDONE TO P20 -10 PASS ITEMS HE HAD PREVIOUSLY FA li.ED 1011 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR CALCut.ATIONS WERE CHANGED AND STOLES T21 4/26/04 INPUT DATA CHANGED TO PAGS A P22-0 FAILED SUPPORT 1 f .7 SEISMIC DFSIGN RFVIEW NRR CALEUI.ATinNS WrRF CllANGFD 10 STO6'ES 121 4/26/04 REDI!CE Tile REPORTED FAILURE P27-14 RATF Of flANiiARS Til 1:ECI' IT ltEl.OH M PEl(CENT tot
- fir i f.N1 t; DIT.1 bil l<f 'I rW Nf(R CAL (111 ATIONS Rf f*ONE TO PAS 3 STDI FS T21 4/06/04 F ail !tIG II.iN8V.PS - 1 VSS Af T tIPATE POD /'
- IIf.IfffII W A'i'.~.t !!ff I !OtiS WI hl' t t ;! l .
. par.F Nfl. 00012 O?/63/00 DIABLO CANYON ALLEGATION FILF (DCAF)
AL L EGil IEYPHRASE RCSPON CHARACTER!?ATION ALLEGER ORIO DOCUMENT ALTERNATE DOC Cl OSING RF:F
- 1020 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR OC FAILED HANGERS IN llNIT 1 STOt FS T21 4/2",/04 AND II ONLY MODIFIED IN UNIT P33-9 II 1030 GIESMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR M-9 SMALL BORE PIPING MANUAL STOVES T23 4/',O/04 ?2/FF6-El FOR DIABLO CANYON IS NOT P263-15 SPECIFIC AND IS THC MOST RIDICULOUS DESIGN DOCUMENT THE ALL EOOR HAS SEEN FRON DCCHTEL i
1031 SIESMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR THE BECHTEL M-9 MANUAL DID NOT STOVES T23 4/30/04 22/FF6-E7 INCLUDE THE AWS WELD PROCEDURE P4-5-15 AND IT'WAS STRESSED THAT AWS DID NOT APPLY TO THE PLANT 1034 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR HANGER DESIGNERS TOLD TO CHECK STOVES T23 4/30/04
. THAT FSAR WAS NOT AFFECTED DY P7-16-24 THE DESIONS WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IT NEANT 1040 DC-SF COMMtfNICATIONS NRRE EARLY PLANT PROBLEMS AND THE STOKES T23 4/30/04 DREAMDOWN MIRROR
- IMAGE PROBLEM ARE NOT P25-1-17 EXPLAINED OR MADE KNOWN TO ENGINEERING OROUP TO PREVENT REPETITIOtt <
1042 SIESMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR BECHTEL HAD PERTINENT DESIGN STOVES T23 4/30/84 22/FE6- E7 INFORMATION THAT WAS NOT USED P32-4 AT DIABLO CANYON 1043 SEISMIC DESIGN NRR OMISSION OF ECCENTRICITIES AND STOllES T23 4/30/04 REVIEWS TORSIONAL STRESSES WERE MADE P37-4-25 DN STRUDEL CALCULATIONS 1044 SEISMIC DESIGN NRR ENGINEERS NOT WORKING ON STOVES T23 4/20/84 REVIEWS CALCULATIONS ARE ASVED TO SIGN P39-5 THEM OFr*
1045 SEISMIC DESIOri NRR A SPECIFIC IIANOER WOULD FAIL STOVES T23 4/30/04 REVIEWS THE WAY IT WAS DESIGNED UNDER P41-17 ANY APPLICADLE ANALYSIS. ONLY
.WAY TO PASS WAS TO ASSUME A WICE FLANGE CONNECTED TO A " '
PLATE-1046' REISMIC DESIGN !!RR STRESS WALKDOWNS DON'T INCLUDC STOVES T23 4/30/04 LI' V l t HS .THE CAPS AT THE SUPPORT P45-4-08 16.47 SF IRill f: l'FU l i .f i IJRR AN O filrti DRAIN t.IME WHIrli c. Tot Fi f27 4e7A/91
- fit N!! LI:1 tloStintlSAI CiY lit L All P WA". P4? ?-oI l'-1 tl i l l l
- l ti i Otif Ar t HiTil r.sitiffns'.
f eilD I PI'/C t ,l tlFG. f r T f il lt ' ,
l'IT. t H I t ril U 14f 'ici ' I r1 f e el t si Ul ti t' I 111t ilt I t il ' fl in t Illi !
' It
- ti s. II f nf ! !! e it a t
- l l - t e .a t
9
. PAGE NO. t'.H;** ) l 3 07/07./04
- DIADLO CANYON ALLEGATION FILE (DCAF)
At.L EO f6 l'EYFHDAGE FESPON CHARACTERI?ATION AlLEFER OP!G DOCtlMENT ALTERNATE DOC l'8OSING FFF IA40 SEISMIC DEUIGN RFVIEW NRR SEISMIC CAL CS ROljNDED OFF ",0 STOFEG T23 4/30/04 MUCH THAT ERRORS COMPOUND P49-6 1049 STOI:ES REfttlTTAL NRR CHECKERS JLIST SION CALC LOAD STOVES T23 4/20/04 SHEETS TO MM E PAPER WORL LOOK F50-13 GOOD 1050 STOVES REBUTTAL NRR OA PERSONNEL ARE RIGHT OUT OF STOKES T23 4/30/04 22/PE6-E7 SCHOOL AND HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE P51-10 OF HOW TO CHECK CALCS 1051 STOVES REBUTTAL NRR THEY DET RID OF STOKES BECAUSE STOKES T23 4/30/04 22/PE6-E7 HE QUESTIONED THE ENTIRE P55-15 '
PROGRAM 1052 OUICK FIX NRR IN QUICK-FIX THE MAIN THING STOKES T23 4/30/04 22/PE6-F7 WAS TO GET THE OUICK FIX FORMS P57-14 SIGNED BY THE RIGHT PEOPLENOT ON HOW TO CORRECT ENGINEERING PRODS 1053 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR MANY IN SNUBBER GROUP DIDN'T STOKES T23 4/30/04 EVEN KNOW HOW TO ACCOUNT FOR P50-23 THE MOVEMENTS THAT SNUBDERS ARE TO ACCOUNT FOR DECAUSE THERE IS NO PROCEDURE ON HOW TO DO THIS ANALYSIS 1056 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR SMALL BORE LINES EXITING THE STOKES T23 4/30/04 CONTAINMENT A LOT OF TIMES DID P67-8 NOT HAVE ENOUGH OFFSET TO FLEX WITHOUT BEING DVERSTRESSED. .
.SIMILAR PROBLEM WITH LARGE DORE LINES 1057 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR ANY PIPE GO.'NG THROUGH STOKES, T23 4/30/04 BLIILDINCS WOdLD SEE NO P22-4 DISPLACEt<NT OR STRESS IS NOT TRUE--ITS UNf'OUNDED ENGINEERING 1050 SEISMIC DESIGN REVIEW NRR MANY MERE ALLEGATIONS OF STOI:ES ' T23 4/30/84 WRONGDOING IN SMALL DORE. P76L74 "
LARGE DORE. DUICK FIX AND DA '
RELATED PRODtEMS. All. THESE ARE GIMil.AR TO PREVIOUS DICE I17. IOtfG l . */.T. '.E I DM II Dr r, ; i ,, g g ,g e ' I f 48 f lT4: filfif t!rfTc0 MAEltlG 3CIStlIC ST f t! re, '/1'n4 .ilf a r1-C(ef C51L AT IDtIS WCRC TUI.D T O MAI E P1 Af.Lif'11 f l Of f9 EOfif PAf r / 14 l'AC1 I' . f . ,~.9' t lMI lif M IFYeltil!; 111. I let!* f:tef I -I!.I
. PAGE tiu. 60914 G ?/03 /fM -'
DIABLO CANYON ALLEGATION fit.E (DCAF)
All EGet LEYPitRASE RESPON CHARACTERI7ATION ALLEGER ORIG DDrilMENT ALTFRNATr. DOC Ct.OSING PFI' 1092 F. MAIL DORE NRR NOT Al.L t.OADS ARE CONSIDERFD DICI: ICE (AN ARF DATFD IN THE CALCULATION OF SMALL 6/7/04 DORC PIPE SilPPORT ANALYSIS 1120 ANCHOR DOLTS NRR DOLTS EMDEDDED A MINIMUM OF ANONYMOUS 5/31/B4 GAP P2 10.5 INCHES INTO CONCRETE THAT WAS ONLY 12 INCHES THICK 1121 ANCHOR DOLTS NRR MANAGEMENT RESPONSE TO ANONYMOUS 5/31/04 GAP PROBLEMS ON THE USE OF P2,3 "THRU-BOLTS" WAS NEVER ADDRESSED
.. _ . . . _ . . 1122. .ANCIIOR DOLTS. NRR- - . CONCRETE. CONES.." POPPED OUT" . ANONYMOUS 5/31/84 GAP P3 DENEATH THREE ANCHOR BOLTS AND AN ENGINEER MISTAKENLY STATED THIS WOULD NOT EFFECT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 1123 ANCHOR BOLTS NRR " DRY PACKING" REPAIR TECHNIOUE ANONYMOUS 5/31/04 GAP P3 FOR VOIDS LEFT WHEN CONCRETE CONES " POPPED OUT" WAS AN INEFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE. DCN ON THIS ISSUE WAS NOT RESOLVED 1124 ANCHOR BOLTS NRR THERE WAS NO DESIGN ANONYMOUS 5/31/04 GAP P4 CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO THE STRUCTURAL EFFECTS WHEN HILTI OUIK-BOLTS ARE EMBEDDED TOO CLOSE TO EACH OTHER FROM OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE CONCRETE 11 5 ANCHOR BOLTS /OUICK NRR SPECOFIC INFORMATION ON ANONYMOUS 5/31/04 GAP P4 FIX MINIMUN EMBEDMENT ON OUICK FIX SHEETS WAS FACTORED OUT OF Tile AS-DUILT REVIEWS 1124 ENVIRONMENTAL. OtlAL NRR RHR RECIRC VALVE 5/O" STUDS PARKS S/31/04 GAP E2 WERE NOT REPLACED AFTER DCN P2 WAS HRITTEN ON THE PRODLEM 1127 ENVIRONMENTAL DUAL NRR EO SAFETY RELATED VALVE PARI:S 5/31/04 GAP E2 NAINTFNANCF WAS PERFORMED P2 , ,
Ul THtlu T Tite USC OF CONTROLLED PRfK.FI'llRFS AND REST!L TED IN VALVF. DAMAGE MID PERSONNEL
'DISCilARfE AtID WA7 HOT RU ttt !I .D 1 I ?ll I tiVIRONMI til t.l I *t v.s lif1r - Pf.'P l045 DID NOI IIICI IlliC A . PAF4 S Se 7 t /'44 GAP f 2 1.IGT!IIG OF "WilA T Di.MAOf- fi lARTS F3 Hf Pt' F:FP(. IEF D Ot t lluH lili .' tfl<E par t Alt I *o"
- I 4 I s !
e N
. q F
E P
m G
N I
e S
~
O L
C f
O D
E T r m A N
m R E
T
~_
L A
T .
N 2
E E
. M U P
.- C A O G D 4 0
G /
I 1
. R 3 O /3
-, 5P *
)
F R
_ A E C G -
D E
( t p
L S m E L
A V R
I A F P H NS O . OS
._ I S I E T T TN
- A NEAK
. G D FVCA E N MAI E L H ANEHDW
. L D IR N A I N I YIN
. T ODUA A
- m. N A IEQMNR O Z TLE AG Y I ALRE O N R LA S ,R A E LTOEDP C I ASEHE .
C TN TTG O A GIF RN L R N OFOI B A IE OPN A H RN EI I C AWORRA D 1 I ENR 4STBUT 6 RAM
_ ELUEA VHONN CTI OF m..
FOVAGO N
O
_ P S
_ E R R R N
L A
~. E Q U
S m A L
. R A H T h N Y E E M
_ K N 5 O 1
R'
_ I N: V m O N
. 4 E' -
OR #
N/T G E
EO L 9 r/ L 2 A '. A 1 PO m_. .
1 e
m.
f f
J l I 'I
' { 4 . ! ' i 4 4 I. i