ML20215E300

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:01, 19 April 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 860924 Meeting W/Util & C-E in Bethesda,Md Re Scope & Schedule for Reload Licensing Activities.Viewgraphs Encl
ML20215E300
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 10/06/1986
From: Marlone Davis
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8610150208
Download: ML20215E300 (17)


Text

- __ _________-________ . _ - . . ..

6 8 'o

  • UNITED STATES 8" Ego NUCLEAR REGULATO3Y COMMISSION

$ 1 ,E WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555

%,,,,, October 6, 1986 Docket No.: 50-528 LICENSEE: Arizona Public Service Company FACILITY: Palo Verde Unit 1

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING TO DISCUSS PALO VERDE UNIT 1 CORE RELOAD ANALYSIS A meeting was held on September 24, 1986 in Bethesda, Maryland with representatives of the licensee, CE, and the NRC staff. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the scope and schedule for the Palo Verde Unit 1 first reload licensing activities. Attendees for the meeting are listed in Enclosure 1 and the meeting is summerized below.

Meetino Summary The licensee made a presentation on the information provided as Enclosure 2.

The points made during the presentation included the following:

1. The first refueling of Palo Verde Unit 1 is currently scheduled for fall of 1987. CE will provide the first reload core. Refueling contracts for subsequent refuelings are currently being renegotiated.
2. Special features of the reload submittal will include the following:
a. CPC improvement program including reload data block
b. Modification to Statistical Combination of Uncertainties (SCU)
c. Large break LOCA evaluation me'.hodology
d. Westinghouse fuel assembly defronstration program where up to 4 Westinghouse fuel assemblies may be included in the Cycle 2 reload to demonstrate fuel compatibility
e. Technical Specifications changes required to support the fuel reload design
f. Additional Technical Specifications changes for implementation during reload
3. The schedule and scope of submittals to the NRC was discussed, including the reload analysis report, the modification to the SCU methodology, and Technical Specifications changes.

The staff suggested that early submission of certain reports such as methodology and topical reports prior to submittal of the reload analysis report would help expedite the review process. The reload analysis is needed 120 days prior to restart. This assumes that all referenced topical reports and any significant revisions in previously accepted methodology have been reviewed and approved by NRC prior to receipt of reload analysis. The staff also requested a more specific list of required Technical Specifications changes at the next meeting.

Technical Specifications changes not in support of reload should be prioritized in order of need to assure effective resource utilization.

8610150208 861006 PDR ADOCK 05000528 P PDR

a o ,

e A followup meeting will be scheduled in January 1987 to finalize schedules for licensee submittals.

/s/

Michael Davis, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate No. 7 Division of PWR Licensing-B

Enclosures:

1. Meeting Attendees
2. Licensee's Presentation cc: See next page d (\

! /

L "U VfD7 VD7 MDavis/yt{ PD7ff{

EAlicit a r'iighton 9//r/86 9/25/86 10/J/86

. kr. E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

Arizona Nuclear Power Project Palo Verde cc:

Arthur C. Gehr, Esq. Kenneth Berlin, Esq.

Snell & Wilmer Winston & Strawn-3100 Valley Center Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85073 2550 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Mr. James M. Flenner, Chief Counsel Arizona Corporation Commission Ms. Lynne Bernabei 1200 West Washington Government Accountability Project Phoenix, Arizona 85007 of the Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street, NW Charles R. Kocher, Esq. Assistant Washington, DC 20009 Council James A. Boeletto, Esq.

Southern California Edison Company Ms. Jill Morrison P. O. Box 800 522 E. Colgate Rosemead, California 91770 Tempi, Arizona 85238 Mr. Mark Ginsberg Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Energy Director Washington Nuclear Operations Office of Eccnomic Planning Combustion Engineering, Inc.

and Development 7910 Woodmont Avenue Suite 1310 1700 West Washington - 5th Floor Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Mr. Wayne Shirley . Mr. Ron Rayner Assistant Attorney General P. O. Box 1509 Bataan Memorial Building Goodyear, AZ 85338 Santa Fe, New Mexico - 87503 Mr. Roy Zimmerman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 239 Arlington, Arizona 85322 Ms. Patrici,1 Lee Hourihan 6413 S. 26th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Regional Administrator, Region V U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596

Enclosure I

. September 24, 1986 Palo Verde Reload Meeting Name Affiliation E. A. Licitra NRC/NRR/PBD7 Cecil Thomas NRC/NRR/PBRS Lariy Kopp NRC/NRR/PBRS Mike Davis NRC/NRR/PBD7 James Raleigh NRC/NRR/PBD7 Jim Church CE Mike Book CE Bruce Miller ANPP/Nuc. Fuel Mgmt.

Gautam Sen ANPP/ Lead Lic. Engineer George W. Knighton NRC/NRR/PBD7 Lonrie Marker ANPP/Nuc. Lic. Engineer Norm Lauben NRC/NRR/PBRS

. . -. __ ~ _ . _ . .- . -

Enclosura 2 5

1 OVERVIEW OF PVNGS UNIT 1 CYCLE 2 RELOAD PLANS AND SPECIAL FEATURES /NEW METHODOLOGY i ,

e 4

PRESENTED TO NRC SEPTEMBER 1986 '

BY 4

' ARIZONA NUCLEAR POWER PROJECT

- COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, 1NC.

i i

f i

I i

1

, MEETING ON PVNGS UNIT 1. CYCLE 2 RELOAD SEPTEMBER 1986 AGENDA

-1. INTRODUCTION OF PERSONNEL - (NLIC)

2. OVERVIEW OF PVNGS UNIT 1 CYCLE 2 PROGRAM - (NFM)
3. SPECIAL FEATURES OF PVNGS UNIT 1. CYCLE 2 RELOAD -

(NFM/NLIC)

CPC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INCLUDING RELOAD DATA BLOCK

~

MODIFICATION TO STATISTICAL COMBINATION OF UNCERTAINTIES (SCU)

LARGE BREAK LOCA EVALUATION METHODOLOGY (EM)

WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM e

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES

4. SCHEDULE / SCOPE FOR'SUBMITTALS TO NRC - (NFM/NLIC)

MODIFICATION TO SCU METHODOLOGY RELOAD ANALYSIS REPORT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES

5. QUESTIONS / COMMENTS - (NLIC)
6. REQUEST FEEDBACK FROM THE NRC - !NLIC)
7. ADJOURNMENT

' NFM INDICATES NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT WILL LEAD TOPIC DISCUSSION.

NLIC INDICATES NUCLEAR LICENSING WILL LEAD TOPIC DISCUSSION.

p. y - -

pm . - m--e e

_ , -- . -- _ _ .- _ _ _ _ ~ . . _ __ _ ._. . . . _ -

PVNGS UNIT 1. CYCLE 2 RELOAD SCHEDULE t

, TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR FALL REFUELING OUTAGE:

4 PVNGS UNIT 1 -

END OF CYCLE 1: 9/15/87

, PVNGS UNIT 1 - STARTUP 0F CYCLE 2: 11/4/87 q

f h

I '

J i

1 h

i t

1 I

t

)

i 4

+

l b

t me- e ve - i*---- * +e- +- me -

-~v

SPEClAL FEATURES'0F PVNGS UNIT 1. CYCLE 2 RELOAD CPC lMPROVEMENT PROGRAM lNCLUDING. RELOAD DATA BLOCK

~*

-MODIFICATION TO STATISTICAL COMBINATION OF UNCERTAINTIES

'(SCU)-

WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM e

i L

l i

CPC TMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

? PROGRAM G0ALS o

AVOID FUTURE CPC SOFTWARE CHANGES FOR RELOAD REDUCERELOADANALYSISEFhbRT REDUCE RELOAD ANALYSIS CALENDAR TIME REDUCE NEED FOR NRC REVIEWS OF RELOAD AN o

REDUCE UNNECESSARY PLANT TRIPS <

e AVOID-TRANSIENTS CAUSED BY UNNECESSARY IMPROVE PLANT AVAILABILITY

~

o SIMPLIFY RELOAD ANALYSES REDUCE RELOAD EFFORT REDUCE RELOAD CALENDAR TIME o

MAINTAIN MARGINS TO SAFETY Y

s

CPC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM A.

OPTIMlZATION OF CPC/CEAC SOFTWARE FOR RELOADS INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION IN EARLY 1986 LEAD PLANTS: SONGS-2 CYCLE 3 (6/86)

ANO-2 DURING CYCLE 6 (9/86)

B. CEAC DESENSITIZATION TO SPURIOUS SIGNALS INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION IN EARLY 1986 LEAD PLANTS:' SONGS-2 CYCLE 3 (6/86)

ANO-2 DURING CYCLE 6 (9/86)

C. RELOAD DATA BLOCK '

INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION IN EARLY 1987 LEAD PLANT: WATERFORD-3 CYCLE 2 (1/87)

CPC IMPROVEMENT P70 GRAM REFERENCES PRE-PROGRAM FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTIONS CEN-304-P REV. O. CEAC CEN-305-P. REV. O. CPC PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS (EXCEPT RDB)

CEN-308-P-A, SOFTWARE MODIFICATION CEN-310-P-A, METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTIONS INCORPORATED INTO CEN-304-P, REV. 1 AND CEN-305-P, REV. 1 PROGRAM MODIFICATI,0NS (INCLUDING RDB)

CEN-302(S)-P, PRESENTATION OF APRIL 1985 (UPDATED IN NOVEMBER PRESENTATION)

CEN-323-P, RDB CONSTANT INSTALLATION CUIDELINES CEN-330-P, RDB SOFTWARE MODIFICATIONS

WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM A. PROPOSED PROGRAM SCOPE

1. FOUR (4) WESTINGHOUSE MODEL C-80 FUEL ASSEMBLIES IRRADIATED IN PVNGS UNIT 1 CYCLE 2 FUEL ASSEMBLIES EXAMINED AFTER EACH CYCLE i

EXPOSURE (CYCLES 2, 3 AND 4)

RAR WILL ADDRESS COMPATIBILITY OF WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLIES e

i B. PROGRAM OBJECTIVE

1. DEMONSTRATE THAT THE WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLIES PERFORM AS EXPECTED UNDER TYPICAL OPERATING AND TRANSIENT CONDITIONS DURING FUEL HANDLING OPERATIONS
2. DEMONSTRATE WESTINGHOUSE FUEL HAS MECHANICAL, THERMAL-HYDRAULIC AND NUCLEAR COMPATIBILITY WITH CE FUEL DESIGN -

j ..

1 1

,-n. - - - & -- - _ - . a +

-'f S

n WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM C.

CORE LOCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLIES

1. DEMO ASSEMBLY POWER WILL BE LOWER THAN PEAK ASSEMBLY POWER DURING NORMAL OPERATION AND TRANSIENTS 4
2. ONE DEMO IN AN INSTRUMENTED LOCATION e
3. NO DEMOS IN A PART-LENGTH CEA LOCATION
4. DEMOS WILL NOT BE POSITIONED IN LOCATIONS REQUIRING BURNABLE POISON RODS
5. LOADED QUARTER CORE SYMMETRIC I e

, , , , , - .y _,


**"'P-'--**"~T-" "'#' ~ '

~

WESTINGHOUSE FU$L ASS $MBLY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM D. LICENSING BASIS

1. COMPATIBILITY STUDY WILL SE COMPLETED DEMONSTRATE THAT ANALYZED PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF WESTINGH0llSE AND CE FUEL ASSEMBLIES ARE NEARLY IDENTICAL
2. THE SAFETY ANALYSIS PERFORMED BY CE WILL B0UND THE WESTINGHOUSE FUEL DEMONSTRATION l

+

ASSEM3 LIES

3. WESTINGHOUSE FUEL ASSEMBLIES WILL BE PLACED IN NON-LIMITING CORE LOCATIONS l

i

. ,,e -- - - , - - - - . - - .-- , .~.- -.----.- . - - _ _ - . ,.,m , -r -- _- - , -. - - --., - , - , - . - , , - , - - ,,-m,s-e-

IECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGES FUEL ASSEMBLY DESIGN LICENSED MAXIMUM ENRI'CHMENT WILL BE INCREASED TO 4.3 WEIGHT PERCENT U-235 (E.G. 5.3.1, FUEL ASSEMBLY DESIGN)

RELOAD DESIGN RELATED TYPICAL EXPECTED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CilANGES NORMALLY REVIEWED FOR A RELOAD (E.G. 3/4.1.3, MOVABLE CONTROL ASSEMBLIES)

CIP RELATED FORMATTING CHANGES TO BE INCORPORATED FOR

~

. CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER CE PLANTS (E.G. 3/4'.3.1, REACTOR PROTECTIVE INSTRUMENTATION)

SCU RELATED MODIFIED SCU PROGRAM WILL RESULT IN A NUMERICALLY DIFFERENT DNBR LIMIT (E.G. 2.2.1, TRIP SETPOINTS) 6

J

.PVNGS UNIT 1. CYCLE 2 RELOAD SCHEDULE SEPTEMBER 1986 ANPP PRESENTATION TO NRC ON PVNGS-1, CYCLE 2 RELOAD PLANS MAY 15. 1987 ANPP SUBMITTAL OF MODIFICATION TO SCU f1ETHODOLOGY TO NRC JULY 1, 1987 ANPP SUBMITTALS TO THE NRC TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES RELOAD ANALYSIS REPORT SEPTEMBER 15. 1987 END OF PVNGS-1 CYCLE 1 NOVEMBER 4, 1987 STARTUP OF PVNGS-1 CYCLE 2 e

e

e

. OCT 6 1986 MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION No(s): 50-528/52 ,

NRC FDW /

Local PDR PBD-7 Reading JPartlow BGrimes ACRS (10)

EJordan Attorney, OELD GWKnighton E. A. Licitra

  • Project Manager JLee NRC PARTICIPANTS E. A. Licitra J. Ma P. T. Kuo D. Crutchfield L. B. Marsh M. J. Davis H. Rood bcc: Applicent & Service List