ML20236B536

Staff Requirements Memo Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote Approving Order to Dismiss Suffolk County,State of Ny & Town of Southampton as Parties in Proceeding Due to Intervenors Conduct

ML20236B536
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	03/13/1989
From:	Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:	Parler W NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 M890303, OL-5, NUDOCS 8903210140
Download: ML20236B536 (2)

Text

.w -

?k-

1. ;A.y g% UNITED STATES - t INLRESPONSE,JPLEASE.

~ .f[ y

' f. <

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM. MISSION . = REFER;TO: M890303-

g-  ; , I WASHINGTON; D.C. 20565 '

4 # ' March:13, 1989

. OFFICE OF THE - i

' SECRETARY l

l

. MEMORANDUM FOR: William C.~Parler, General Counsel" FROM: M.r el J. Chilk,1 Secretary '

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS- . AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION =

AND: VOTE,.4:00 P.M., FRIDAY, MARCH'.3,t1989,..

COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE. WHITE; FLINT NORTH,JROCKVILLE,.MARYLANDt(OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 3 I. SECY-89 Cmagission Decision - Shoreham S'anction Issue-L The commission, by'a 4-0 vote, approved,an'. ' order. which L deta3.ls the' Commission's deci' s ion on the imposition of sanctions in the Shoreham proceeding.

1 The order conclude'd that thel interveners' conduct! Lin' this.

proceeding not only. permitted the' imposition'of.a heavy q sanction but compelled-it.. Accordingly,Ethe order dismissed'

?- q Suffolk_ County,_the. State of New York-and the Town'of:

Southampton as; parties'from'all proceedings'pending_before'the Commission or.'any of its' subordinate adjudicatory Boards..'All s l contested proceedings were-ended;bthe proceeding on thel1988

emergency planningi exercise before the

OL-5 ' Licensing Board was As this decision constituted the final-I terminated. .;

adjudicatory' decision in this matter the commission also 'I directed;the following actions'to. assure'that no~ safety-issues remain unexamined before issuance of an operating license lfor ,

the'Shoreham facility. The' Director of. Nuclear-Reactor?

"~

Regulation shall evaluate each contention'which remains '

i outstanding asia result of this decision and' explain to the.

Commission-in-a~public meeting lwhether,.and if!so,.how each has.

been' resolved.. Only?after the. conclusion 1of suchla-briefing, y after the:necessary findings of 10 CFR Sec. 50.57. have,been mi' made, Land'.after an'. affirmative Commission. vote to authorize issuance,.Lwill'any license above'5-percent power be issued.for

~

~

the Shoreham~ facility..

.d 8903210140 890313 "

PDR

'i PT9,7 10CFR 1

PNU . ./h l l

9 l

,Coinmissioner Curtiss did not participate in this matter.'

(Subsequently, on March 3, 1989, the' Secretary signed the Order.)

cc: Chairman Zech Commissioner Roberts Colemissioner Carr Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Curtiss' EDO. ,

GPA PDR - Advance DCS - P1-124 i

i y

l l

1

?

L. . . . . - . _ _ - - - . _ - - - _ . _ - - - _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - _ - - -.

- - _ - - - _