ML20236B536

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Requirements Memo Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote Approving Order to Dismiss Suffolk County,State of Ny & Town of Southampton as Parties in Proceeding Due to Intervenors Conduct
ML20236B536
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 03/13/1989
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Parler W
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 M890303, OL-5, NUDOCS 8903210140
Download: ML20236B536 (2)


Text

.w

?k

A.y g%

UNITED STATES -

t

' f.

INLRESPONSE,JPLEASE.

~.f[

y NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM. MISSION.

= REFER;TO:

M890303-

g-I WASHINGTON; D.C. 20565

' March:13, 1989 4

. OFFICE OF THE -

i

' SECRETARY l

l

. MEMORANDUM FOR:

William C.~Parler, General Counsel" FROM:

M el J. Chilk,1 Secretary

.r

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS-. AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION =

AND: VOTE,.4:00 P.M.,

FRIDAY, MARCH'.3,t1989,..

COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE. WHITE; FLINT NORTH,JROCKVILLE,.MARYLANDt(OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) 3 L

SECY-89 Cmagission Decision - Shoreham S'anction Issue-I.

The commission, by'a 4-0 vote, approved,an'. ' order. which L deta3.ls the' Commission's deci' ion on the imposition of sanctions in the s

Shoreham proceeding.

1 The order conclude'd that thel interveners' conduct! Lin' this.

proceeding not only. permitted the' imposition'of.a heavy q

sanction but compelled-it.. Accordingly,Ethe order dismissed'

?-

q Suffolk_ County,_the. State of New York-and the Town'of:

Southampton as; parties'from'all proceedings'pending_before'the Commission or.'any of its' subordinate adjudicatory Boards..'All s

l contested proceedings were-ended;bthe proceeding on thel1988 emergency planningi exercise before the: OL-5 ' Licensing Board was I

terminated.

As this decision constituted the final-adjudicatory' decision in this matter the commission also

'I directed;the following actions'to. assure'that no~ safety-issues remain unexamined before issuance of an operating license lfor the'Shoreham facility.

The' Director of. Nuclear-Reactor?

"~

Regulation shall evaluate each contention'which remains i

outstanding asia result of this decision and' explain to the.

Commission-in-a~public meeting lwhether,.and if!so,.how each has.

been' resolved.. Only?after the. conclusion 1of suchla-briefing, y

after the:necessary findings of 10 CFR Sec. 50.57. have,been mi' made, Land'.after an'. affirmative Commission. vote to authorize issuance,.Lwill'any license above'5-percent power be issued.for

~

the Shoreham~ facility..

~

.d 8903210140 890313

'i PDR 10CFR 1

PT9,7 PNU.

./h l

l

9 l -

,Coinmissioner Curtiss did not participate in this matter.'

(Subsequently, on March 3, 1989, the' Secretary signed the Order.)

cc:

Chairman Zech Commissioner Roberts Colemissioner Carr Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Curtiss' EDO.

GPA PDR - Advance DCS - P1-124 i

i y

l l

1

?

L...

-.