ML20212F199

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:39, 21 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs Revising Proposed SRs to Remove Allowable Humidity & Temperature Testing Ranges for Charcoal Adsorber
ML20212F199
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/28/1997
From:
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20212F175 List:
References
NUDOCS 9711040208
Download: ML20212F199 (6)
v • d • e


Text

._ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . - _ _ .__ _ _ _ _ . . . _ - . _ _ . ._ _

ENCLOSURE 1 HRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS.1 AND 2 i DOCKET NOS. 50 325 AND 50 324 LICENSE NOS. DPR 71 AND DPR 62 '

SUPPLEMENT TO REQUEST FOR LICENSE AMENDMENTS CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM i CilARCOAL TESTING REQUIREMENTS i (NRC TAC NOS. M99232 AND M99233) {

i i

i c

i I

I 1

REVISED TECilNICAI, SPECIFICATION PAGES - BSEP, UNIT NO.1  :

I i

t

, + , - , . - , - , + , -,-,--v-- ,,w - , e- ,,, - ,-v,- - - - , , - , - ,- ,e -- .. -

-- ---r

plARTSYSTEMS

- *J/_f,7.2 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTilATf0N SYSTEM l SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

2. Verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976,'%cet: the ! hntor-y.

te:tinperiteri: Of Regel:tery "0: ! tier, C.S.: ef ":gul:t ey

- Cuide 1.52, ":.j :ien 1, My-ISXjr

3. Verifying a system flow rate of 2000 cfm It: 10". during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1975.

I c. After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation by verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysis of a representat.ive carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, the l ahnrit nry__t o et 4 rg cr < t:r t : :( aegy;;;;9 T July 4:! t t 1976),maatel.6.2 e.a ef hgel:tery Cuide 1.52, n vi:ica 1, My 1975.

d. At least once per 18 months by:
1. Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is 15.25 inches Water l Gauge while operating the filter train at a flow rate of 2000 cfm
  • 10"..
2. Verifying that on a smoke detector or control room ventilation system high radiation test signal, the control building ventilation system automatically diverts its inlet flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks of the emergency filtration system.
3. Veri?ying that on a chlorine detector test signal, the control building ventilation system automatically isolates and the control room emergency filtration system cannot be started by a smoke detector or control room ventilation system high radiation test signal.
4. Verifying that the system maintains the control room at a positive pressure relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation.

u and tested in accordance with the methodology provided by ASTM D3803-1989, meets the acceptance criteria of < 5.0% penetration of methyliodide.

BRUNSWICK - UNIT 1 3/4 7 4 Amendment No. 261

' PLANT SYSTEMS -

3/4 7.2 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENIllATION SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE RE0'J1REMENTS (Continued)

2. Verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory ,

analysis of a re)resentative carbon sample obtained in accordance with legulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52. Revision 1 July 1916, and tested in accordance w:th the methodology provided by ASTM 03803 1989. meets the acceptance criteria of < 5.0% penetration of methyl iodide.

3. Verifying ,a system flow rate of 2000 cfm 10% during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI M310 1975.
c. After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation by verifying within 31 days af+er removal that a laboratory analysis of a re resentative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Re ulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52. Revision 1.

Ju y 1976, and tested in accordance with the methodology provided by ASTM D3803-1989. meets the acceptance criteria of < 5.0%

penetration of methyl iodide.

d. At least once per 18 months by:
1. Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is 5 5.25 inches Water Gauge while operating the filter train at a flow rate of 2000 cfm i 10%.
2. Verifying that on a smoke detector or control room ventilation system high radiation test signal. the control building ventilation system automatically diverts its inlet flow through the HEPA filters ano charcoal odsorber banks of the emergency filtration system.
3. Verifying that on a chlorine detector test signal, the control building ventilation system automatically isolates '

and the control room emergency filtration system cannot be started by a smoke detector or control room ventilation system high radiatinn test signal.

4 Verifying that the system maintains the control room at a positive pressure relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation.

BRUNSWICK - UNIT 1. 3/4 7-4 Amendment No.

[

ENCLOSURE 2 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS.1 AND 2 -

DOCKET NOS. 50-325 AND 50 324  !

LICENSE NOS. DPR 71 AND DPR-62

SUPPLEMENT TO REQUEST FOR LICENSE AMENDMENTS '

CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM CilARCOhL TESTING REQUIREMENTS (NRC TAC NOS. M99232 AND M99233) j t

1 i

5 REVISFP TECllNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES - BSEP, UNIT NO. 2 F

a l

. . . . - _ _ . . . . . . . . . - . . . - . . ~ . . , . . u. .. - . . ~ . . . . .m. . . _ . . - , -

' PLANT SYSTEMS h4.7.2 CONTROL RQQM EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM l SURVEILLANCEREQUIREMENTS(Continued)

2. Verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratcry analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in  !

accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory ,

Guide 1.52, Revision 1, July 1976,%m" +ka 1a b it:ry  ;

te:tir; crit:rt: Of %;uhtery % ef 9:gul m ry l Cu ! de ! .-54, o ^"' ' - 1, Aly 1^7)qi tion C .S . :

( 3. Verifying a system flow rate of 2000 cfm i 10% during l

system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI H510-197a. l I

f c. After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber oper: tion by verifying within 31 days after removal .that a laboratory analysis of a l' representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 1, '

July 1976,'f-a" na '^^"+"" + "+ '" "' t:-h c f o.:geh t:ry '

4e:itter c ,s. e r %;uhtery Guide !.M, R:;iWr, I, Ai,7 leM .

At least once per 18 months by: [

d.

1. Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is 15.25 inches Water [ ,

Gaugs while operating the filter train at a flow rate of 2000 cfm i 10%.

2. Verifying that on a. smoke detector or control room ventilation system high radiation test signal, the control
  • building ventilation system automatically diverts its inlet flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks of the emergency filtration system.
3. Verifying that on a chlorine detector test signal, the ,

control building ventilation system automatically isolates and the control room emergency filtration system cannot be started by a smoke detector or control rocm ventilation system high radiation test signal.

[

4. Verifying that the system maintains the control room at a positive pressure relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation.  ;

r' '

and tested in accordance with the methodology provided by ASTM D3803-1989, meets the

  • acceptance criteria of < 5.0% penetration of methyl iodide.

L BRUNSWICK UNIT 2 3/4 7 4 Amendment No. 192

.- .-. . . _ -. - -. - = .- . . . _ . - . _ . .. .

ePLANT' SYSTEMS 3/4.7.2 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

2. Verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysts of a re)resentative carbon sample obtained in acccrdance with legulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.S2. Revision 1. July 1976. and tested in accordance with the methodology provided by ASTM D3803 1989. meets the acceptance criteria of < 5.0% penetration of methyl iodide.
3. Verifying a system flow rate of 2000 cfm 10% during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510 1975. ,
c. After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation by verifying within 31 days after removal that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52. Revision 1.

July 1976. and tested in accordance with the methodology provided by ASTM D3803 1989, meets the acceptance criteria of < 5.0%

penetration of methyl iodide.

d. At least once per 18 month by:
1. Verifying that thL essure drop across the combined HEPA ,

filters and charcoal adsorber banks is 5 5.25 inches Water Gauge while operating the filter train at a flow rate of 2000 cfm i 10%.

2. Verifying that on a smoke detector or control room .

ventilation system high radiation test signal, the control building ventilation system automatically diverts its inlet flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks of the emergency filtration system.

3. Verifying that on a chlorine detector test signal, the control building ventilation system automatically isolates and the control room emergency filtration system cannot be started by a smoke detector or control room ventilation system high radiation test signal.
4. Verifying that the system maintains the control room at a positive pressure relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation.

BRUNSWICK - UNIT 2 3/4 7-4 Amendment No.

-. . . -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20212F199&oldid=3100517"